DOCSLIB.ORG

Feminist Criticism: a Revolution of Thought, a Study on Showalter’S Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feminist Criticism: a Revolution of Thought, a Study on Showalter’S Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness Feminist Criticism: A Revolution of Thought, A Study on Showalter’s Feminist Criticism in The Wilderness. Hayel Mohammed Ahmed Al-hajj Department of literature, Faculty of Arts Osmania university Hyderabad, India e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: paper will examine what feminist theoretical view in Showalter’s essay “feminist Elaine Showalter’s Feminist Criticism criticism in the wilderness” and it will in the Wilderness is a significant work in the discuss why “feminist criticism in the field of literary criticism. It concerns with wilderness” as a revolution of thought by understanding of women centric mysteries indicating to her new ideas that she has like women’s body, psyche, language and brought to the field of literary feminism as the inter-related dynamics of these concepts. feminist critics and writer as well. Woman is surviving and struggling to make her identity in the society. The writing of the Showalter brings up a new vision to woman reflects her own experience and feminist criticism. She reviews in her essay position in the society where she exists as an lots of feminist critical views which have individual and as a female as well. been brought before her, and she explain the Showalter’s essay is a witness to her problems with such views. struggle to find a concept that can suggest (Keywords): feminism; criticism; the feminine to escape from its stereotypical wilderness; revolution; thought; associations with inferiority. Showalter has Showalter. focused on the concept of Gynocriticism to prove her opinion. INTRIDUCTION: This paper deals with Showalter’s ideas Feminist critical theory and practice is in the essay “feminist criticism in the the product of the Feminist Movement that wilderness” as a revolution of thought. The took place during the 1960s and 1970s. It is a critique of the patriarchal mode of First, the essay highlights the need for thinking and its political approach towards feminist theories to work out a framework literature and literary criticism. The they can share. She shows that by stating patriarchal mode of thinking subordinates "An early obstacle to constructing a women to men in familial, religious, theoretical framework for feminist criticism political, economic, social, legal and artistic was the unwillingness of many women to domains. This patriarchal ideology teaches limit or bound an expressive and dynamic women to internalize these concepts in the enterprise" process of their socialization. Among those eminent feminist critics who brought up To Showalter, the real obstacle of not feminist criticism is Elaine Showalter forming theoretical framework for feminist (January 21, 1941). She is an influential criticism was because many women are American literary critic, feminist, and writer unwilling to establish that and they limited on cultural and social issues. She is one of themselves to the expressive and dynamic the founders of feminist literary criticism in style. United States academia, developing the Then Showalter shows the rejection for concept and practice of gynocritics. both imitation and protest, she advocates Gynocriticism concerned with the specificity approaching feminist criticism from a of women’s experience and women’s cultural perspective in the current female writing. Her well known works are phase, rather than from perspective that Women’s Liberation and Literature; Female traditionally come from an endocentric Studies IV; Women’s Studies; Signs: perspective like psychoanalytic and Journal of Women; Culture and Society and biological theories, for example. feminist in A literature of their own: British Women the past have worked with within these Novelists from Bronte to Lessing (1977) traditions by revising and criticizing female representations, or lack thereof, in the male traditions. “Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness” as a Revolution of Thought in Feminist Showalter says, " A cultural theory Criticism acknowledges that there are important differences between women as writers: class, race, nationality, and history are literary determinants as significant as the same time exist within the male gender. Nonetheless, women's culture forms tradition, but no which it is not dependent a collective experience within the cultural and to which it is not answerable. whole, an experience that binds women Showalter continues to argue that there writers to each other over time and space" are essentially two kinds of feminist She doesn’t advocate replacing theories. The first concerns itself with the psychoanalysis, for example, with cultural women as a reader and may be called anthropology, rather, she suggests that feminist critic. The second concerns itself approaching woman's writing from a with the women as a writer and may be cultural perspective is one among many called Gynocritics. It deals with the women valid perspectives that will uncover female as the producer of the textural meaning. traditions. However, cultural anthropology Showalter bases her theory on four models – and social history are especially fruitful biological criticism, linguistic criticism, because " Cultural anthropology and social psycho-analytical criticism and the theory of history can perhaps offer us a terminology women’s culture. and a diagram of women's cultural Therefore, Showalter suggests situation". But feminist critics must use this gynocritics theories which are centered on concept in relation to what women actually the experience of women as writers. write, not in relation to a theoretical, Gynocriticism is a term coined in the political, metaphoric, or visionary ideal of seventies by Elian Showalter to describe a what women ought to write." new literary project intended to construct "a She is going on to not advocate a framework for the analysis of woman separation of the female tradition. She literature". By expanding the historical study argues that woman must work both inside of woman writers as a distinct literary and outside the male tradition tradition. Gynocritics sought to develop new simultaneously. Showalter says the most models based on the study of flame constrictive approach to future feminist experience to the replace male of literary theory and criticism lies in the focus on criticisms. gynocriticim was designed as a" nurturing a new feminine cultural second phase" in feminist criticism. Turning perspective within a feminist tradition that at to force on, and interrogation of female authorship, images, the feminine experience After her coining the term of and ideology and the history development of gynocriticism she shows the perishing of the female literary tradition. literary critics in the wilderness “Matthew Arnold also thought that literary critics Gynocriticism also examines the female might perish in the wilderness before they struggle for identity and the social construct reached the promised land of of gender. According to Elian Showalter, disinterestedness."(308). She shows how genocritics is the study on not only the Arnold considers that all literary critics female as a gender status but also the might perish in the wilderness in their search internalized consciousness of the female. of the promised land. Arnold seems here to The uncovering of the female subculture and refer to the satisfactory judgment of exposition of the female model is intension criticism. Similarly, Showalter seems to of the genocriticism. Comprising have the view on feminist criticism in recognition of a distinct female canon where particular. a female identity is sought free from the masculine definition and opposition. She continues to show that the critics seem to be still wandering in the wilderness Gynocriticism accordingly challenged a since there is still disinterestedness of the Freudian psychoanalytic perspective theory of criticism. Moreover, the situation whereby the female inherently suffers envy of criticism is still bound exclusively to the of men and feeling of an adequacy and masculine domain. She states that clearly by injustice, combined of feeling of intellectual saying: inferiority. Arguing that male phatic produce itself create a female consciousness that “But if, in the 1980s, feminist demands a critique and the prejudice against literary critics are still wandering in the wilderness, we are in good the female incites a specific noise and gets company; for, as Geoffrey Hartman attributed to the female. Gynocriticism tells us, all criticism is in the stressed that this prejudice has concealed the wilderness. Feminist critics may be startled to find ourselves in this female literary tradition to the point of band of theoretical pioneers, since imitating the masculine. in the American literary tradition the wilderness has been an exclusively masculine domain. Yet between feminist ideology and the liberal ideal of disinterestedness lies basis; it has been an empirical the wilderness of theory, which we orphan in the theoretical storm. In too must make our home.” (308) 1975, I was persuaded that no theoretical manifesto could This quote shows what Showalter aims adequately account for varied at by saying " we too must make our home", methodologies and ideologies which she states here that feminist criticism should called themselves feminist reading or writing.” (308) not continue to be in the wilderness. They should make their own theoretical views of Showalter, then, moves further to show criticism.“Women have no wilderness in real examples of feminist critics by them, they are provident instead, content in commenting on Virginia Woolf who, to the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Literaturverzeichnis
    Literaturverzeichnis Abel, Elizabeth, ed. (1982): Writing and Sexual Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Adams, Hazard (1988): "Canons: Literary Criteria/Power Criteria". Criticallnquiry 14;4, 748-764. Aiken, Susan (1986): "Women and the Question of Canonicity". College English 48;3, 288-301. Alter, Robert (1988): "The Difference ofLiterature". Poetics Today 9;3, 573-591. Altieri, Charles (1983): "An Idea and Ideal of a Literary Canon". Critica/lnquiry 10, 37-60. Anderegg, Johannes ( 1983): "Das Fiktionale und das Ästhetische". Funktionen des Fiktiven, ed. Dieter Henrich, Wolfgang Iser. München: Fink, 153-172. Andersen, Margret (1975): "Feminism As A Criterion of the Literary Critic." Feminist Criticism. Essays on Theory, Poetry and Prose, ed. Cheryl Brown and Karen Olsen. London et al.: The Scarecrow Press, 1978, 1-10. Amold, Matthew (1865): "The Function of Criticism at the Present Time". Leeruresand Essays in Criticism, ed. R.H. Super and Sister Thomas Marion Hoctor. Ann Arbor: The University ofMichigan Press, 1962,258-285. Amold, Matthew (1880): "The Study of Poetry". English Literature and lrish Politics, ed. R.H. Su­ per. Ann Arbor: The University ofMichigan Press, 1973, 161-188. Atwood, Margaret (1976): "On Being a 'Woman Writer': Paradoxes and Dilemmas". Second Words. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984, 190-204. Bagwell, Timothy (1986): American Formalism and the Problem of Interpretation. Houston, Tx: Rice University Press. Baker, Houston A., Jr. (1980) Afro-American Poetics: Revisions of HarZern and the Black Aesthe­ tic. Madison: University ofWisconsin Press, 1988. Baker, Houston A., Jr. (1981) "Generational Shifts and the Recent Criticism of Afro-American Literature". BlackAmerican Literature Forum 15;1, 3-21.
    [Show full text]
  • APÉNDICE BIBLIOGRÁFICO1 I. Herederas De Simone De Beauvoir A. Michèle Le Doeuff -Fuentes Primarias Le Sexe Du Savoir, Aubier
    APÉNDICE BIBLIOGRÁFICO1 I. Herederas de Simone de Beauvoir A. Michèle Le Doeuff -Fuentes primarias Le sexe du savoir, Aubier, Paris : Aubier, 1998, reedición: Champs Flammarion, Paris, 2000. Traducción inglesa: The Sex of Knowing. Routledge, New-York, 2003. L'Étude et le rouet. Des femmes, de la philosophie, etc. Seueil, Paris, 1989. Tradcción inglesa: Hipparchia's Choice, an essay concerning women, philosophy, etc. Blackwell, Oxford, 1991. Traducción española: El Estudio y la rueca, ed. Catedra, Madrid, 1993. L'Imaginaire Philosophique, Payot, Lausanne, 1980. Traducción inglesa: The Philosophical Imaginary, Athlone, London, 1989. The Philosophical Imaginary ha sido reeditado por Continuum, U. K., 2002. "Women and Philosophy", en Radical Philosophy, Oxford 1977; original francés en Le Doctrinal de Sapience, 1977; texto inglés vuelto a publicar en French Feminist Thought, editado por Toril Moi, Blackwell, Oxford 1987. Ver también L'Imaginaire Philosophique o The Philosophical Imaginary, en una antología dirigida por Mary Evans, Routledge, Londres. "Irons-nous jouer dans l'île?", en Écrit pour Vl. Jankélévitch, Flammarion, Flammarion, 1978. "A woman divided", Ithaca, Cornell Review, 1978. "En torno a la moral de Descartes", en Conocer Descartes 1 Este apéndice bibliográfico incluye las obras de las herederas de Simone de Beauvoir, así como las de Hannah Arendt y Simone Weil, y algunas de las fuentes secundarias más importantes de dichas autoras. Se ha realizado a través de una serie de búsquedas en la Red, por lo que los datos bibliográficos se recogen tal y como, y en el mismo orden con el que se presentan en las diferente páginas visitadas. y su obra, bajo la dirección de Victor Gomez-Pin, Barcelona 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One Towards a Feminist Reading
    Chapter One Towards a Feminist Reading The advent of feminism as a global and revolutionary ideology has brought into the field of literary criticism new critical outlooks and modes of exegesis. The practice of reading of any literary text has become a site in the struggle for change in gender relations that prevail in society. A reading that is feminist aims at asking such rudimentary questions: how the text defines sexual questions, what it says about gender relations and how it represents women. In other words, feminist reading/criticism has come to be recognized as a political discourse: a critical and theoretical practice committed to the struggle against patriarchy and sexism. The influential feminist critic, Elaine Showalter points out that two factors - gender and politics- which are suppressed in the dominant models of reading gain prominence with the advent of a feminist perspective. In every area of critical reflection whether it is literary representations of sexual difference or the molding/shaping of literary genres by masculine values feminist criticism has established gender as a fundamental category of literary analysis. With ,gender as a tool of literary interpretation the issue of silencing of the female voice in the institutions of literature, criticism and theory has also come to the forefront. Appreciating the widespread importance of gender, feminist philosophers resist speaking in gender-neutral voice. They value women's experiences, interest, and seek to shift the position of women from object to one of subject and agent. 1 Moreover, it has been an important function of feminist criticism to redirect attention to personal and everyday experience of alienation and oppression of women (as reflected in literary texts).
    [Show full text]
  • 43 Elaine SHOWALTER: 'TOWARDS a FEMINIST POETICS'
    216 TWENTIETH·CENTURY LITERARY THEORY 43 ElAINE SHOWALTER: 'TOWARDS A FEMINIST POETICS' Feminist criticism can be divided into two distinct varieties. The first type is concerned with woman as reader - with woman as the con­ sumer of male-produced literature, and with the way in which the hypothesis of a female reader changes our apprehension of a given text, awakening us to the significance of its sexual codes. I shall call this kind of analysis the feminist critique, and like other kinds of critique it is a historically grounded inquiry which probes the ideo­ logical assumptions of literary phenomena. Its subjects include the images and stereotypes of women in literature, the omissions and misconceptions about women in criticism, and the fissures in male­ constructed literary history. It is also concerned with the exploita­ tion and manipulation of the female audience, especially in popular culture and film; and with the analysis of woman-as-sign in semiotic systems. The second type of feminist criticism is concerned with woman as writer - with woman as the producer of textual meaning, with the history, themes, genres and structures of literature by women. Its subjects include the psychodynamics of female creativity; linguistics and the problem of a female language; the trajectory of the individual or collective female literary career; literary history; and, of course, studies of particular writers and works. No term exists in English for such a specialised discourse, and so I have adapted the French term la gynocritique: 'gynocritics' (although the significance of the male pseudonym in the history of women's writing also suggested the term 'georgics').
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Androgyny in Virginia Woolf's a Room of One's Own
    THE PROBLEM OF ANDROGYNY IN VIRGINIA WOOLF'S A ROOM OF ONE'S OWN By GLENDA ANN LOCKHART Bachelor of Arts in Arts and Sciences Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1986 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS December, 1993 OKLAHOMA S'rATE UNIVERSITY THE PROBLEM OF ANDROGYNY IN VIRGINIA WOOLF'S A ROOM OF ONE'S OWN Thesis Approved: ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page INTRODUCTION. NARRATIVE FRAMES AS RHETORICAL STRATEGY: THE ARGUMENT AND RELEVANT SCHOLARS·HIP . ...............•..•............•...•... 1 I. MODERN AUTHORITY AND WOMEN'S AUTHORITY: ESSAYS 1918-1925 .......................•..•....•.. 19 II. "A ROOM OF ONE'S OWN" AND "ANDROGYNY": TWO PRESCRIPTIONS FOR AUTHORITY IN A ROOM OF ONE I s OWN ............................... 3 5 III. "ANDROGYNY" AND THE DUPLICITOUS NARRATOR ....•..... 59 CONCLUSION . ..•.•.•......•...•.....•...•..•.••.........•.. 8 3 NOTES ................................ ....................... 8 7 WORKS CITED . ............................................. 100 i i i INTRODUCTION NARRATIVE FRAMES AS RHETORICAL STRATEGY: THE ARGUMENT AND RELEVANT SCHOLARSHIP My project in this thesis is to dispute the widely held belief that in A Room of one's Own, Virginia Woolf advocates the development of an androgynous perspective as necessary for women writers to produce literature. My endeavor is occasioned by the nature of the misreadings following from that premise: on one hand, those that see Woolf's feminism as compromised by her perceived endorsement of "androgyny"; on the other, those that embrace "androgyny" as a viable approach to femal e authority. In particular, I take issue with the obviation of the narrative frames of A Room of One's own required to sustain such readings.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9201665 Tbward a feminist identity: Contemporary Mexican-American women novelists Gonz&lez, Marfa Carmen, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1991 Copyright ©1991 by GonzAlez, Marfa Carmen.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Woolf, the Problem of Language, and Feminist Aesthetics
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1993 A Voice of One's Own: Virginia Woolf, the Problem of Language, and Feminist Aesthetics Lisa Karin Levine College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Levine, Lisa Karin, "A Voice of One's Own: Virginia Woolf, the Problem of Language, and Feminist Aesthetics" (1993). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625831. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-fz2e-0q20 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Voice of One's Own: Virginia Woolf, the Problem of Language, and Feminist Aesthetics A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of English The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Lisa Karin Levine 1993 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Lisa Karin Levine Approved, May 1993 Esther Lanigan, Chair Elsa Nettels Deborah Morse DEDICATION The author wishes to dedicate this text to Drs. Arlene and Joel Levine, without whose love and support none of this would be possible. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express her appreciation to Professor Esther Lanigan for her many hours of reading and invaluable criticism of this text, and also to Professors Deborah Morse and Elsa Nettels for their time and instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Autor(en): Soltysik Monnet, Agnieszka / Austenfeld, Thomas Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: SPELL : Swiss papers in English language and literature Band (Jahr): 23 (2009) PDF erstellt am: 24.09.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-389621 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Introduction The title of this volume, Writing American Women, can be read in at least two different ways. One is a verbal reading, according to which someone "writes" American women; another is adjectival, according to which American women write. The essays collected here take both approaches. Some are about women who write and about the biographical, editorial, historical, and geographical conditions informing that writing; others are about the way that women are represented by themselves and by others.
    [Show full text]
  • RUL Journal 2005.P65
    76 THE JOURNAL OF THE RUTGERS UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES “WHAT WOMEN CAN DO WHEN THEY PUT THEIR MINDS TO IT”:1 ELAINE SHOWALTER AND VIRAGO PRESS BY ELLEN GILBERT, CRYSTAL DECOTIIS, and TERESA SCHARTEL Ellen Gilbert is an adjunct lecturer in the Douglass Scholars Program and a member of the Princeton Research Forum; Crystal DeCotiis (Douglass ’05) and Teresa Schartel (Douglass ’05) are honors students in the Douglass Scholars Program. The Gift The distinguished literary critic Elaine Showalter made a new contribution to the universe of feminist scholarship during the summer of 2003. Showalter’s previous contributions to the field include, of course, the groundbreaking books A Literature of Their Own, Sexual Anarchy, and Inventing Herself, as well as dozens of articles and essays. This particular contribution, however, was in the form of a noteworthy book collection: a nearly complete set of first editions from the London-based, feminist publisher Virago Press. The Virago collection is not Showalter’s first gift to Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; in 2002, she gave Rutgers her collection of nineteenth-century Victorian women’s novels and writings amassed when she was starting out as a young scholar. Speaking at the Fifteenth Annual Louis Faugeres III Bishop Lecture at the time of this earlier gift, Showalter expressed the hope that others would follow her lead: “Indeed, I want to encourage everyone to enjoy the satisfactions of giving away their books while they are still alive.”2 Showalter has published numerous titles with Virago Press and has served on its board of directors; she received the books in this collection during her tenure on the board.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Camille Paglia 251 Appendix Two: Interview with Naomi Wolf 266 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/36104 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. POPULAR / POST-FEMINISM AND POPULAR LITERATURE Barbara Kastelein PhD University of Warwick Department of English and Comparative Literary Studies June 1994 SUMMARY This thesis is concerned with the ambivalence expressed towards feminism by many women in the last decade and identifies post-feminism as a problematic through which to explore this in contemporary women's writing. It focuses on selected fictional and non-fictional texts of the 1980s and 1990s and examines the ways in which they engage with feminist concerns. Until now, post-feminism has not been studied through its articulations in popular literature. To do justice to the wide range of views held by women and avoid a defensive and pessimistic reading of commercialised mainstream culture, I have made use of intertextual readings. The methodology is derived from feminist critical theory and cultural studies in order to address the relation between feminist and non-feminist literary texts and the dynamic interchange between what have been labelled as feminist politics and mainstream or consumer women' s interests. The significance of the research lies in the identification of ways in which such works of fiction and non- fiction provide an outlet for women's voices which could serve as a basis for developing feminist criticism and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMINIST GIANTS: CONTRIBUTIONS to the FEMINIST CANON by FAMOUS SELECTED THEORISTS Majid Mgamis Tafila Technical University, Jordan
    European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies Vol.6, No.2, pp.26-29, March 2018 ___Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) FEMINIST GIANTS: CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FEMINIST CANON BY FAMOUS SELECTED THEORISTS Majid Mgamis Tafila Technical University, Jordan ABSTRACT: The paper explores the pivotal contribution made to the feminist canon by some famous Anglo-American, African-American and French theorists. In particular, the paper discusses the principal feminist arguments made by Virginia Woolf, Alice Walker, Simon De Beauvoir, Helen Cixous, and Elaine Showalter. Each theorist has significantly added to the agenda of the feminist discipline, and thus evidently contributed to the transformation the discipline has witnessed so far. The paper highlights this contribution by investigating the major concepts and ideas proposed by those writers, and attempts to pinpoint similarities and differences among them, when applicable. KEYWORDS: Feminism, Literary Criticism, Anglo-American INTRODUCTION The feminist canon has brought about a number of women writers and theorists who significantly contributed to the establishment and development of the field. These women literary giants gave feminism a new direction, each with her peculiar outlook and methodology. Incidentally, the patriarchal oppression and discrimination that these writers fought contributed to shaping their characters and better equipped them articulate women’s needs. In fact, their writings proved that women indeed possess every endowment that would empower them to be on equal footing with man. Within this context, this paper aims at exploring the contributions of some premier feminist writers who provided the framework for the emergence and development of feminist theory, highlighting their similarities and differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Elaine Showalter, Ed. the New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Wo Men, Literature and Th Eory
    Elaine Showalter, ed. The New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Wo men, Literature and Th eory. (New York: Pantheon Books, 1985) 403 pp., $13.95 paper. Two publications important in the study of women's literature appeared this spring- The No rton Anthology of Literature by Wo men, edited by Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar, and this anthology of previously published essays on feminist literary theory. These vol umes will probably have greatest impact on university courses in women's literature, but one should not overlook their significance for ethnic studies. Like studies in ethnic literatures, feminist criticism has before it the task of defining a tradition outside of the main-stream and establishing a literary canon not previously acknowledged as valid. For this volume Elaine Showalter selected eighteen essays to represent the writing offeminist critics from 1977-1983. All ofthem except Barbara Smith are in academic professions and many of them are well-known­ Sandra Gilbert, Susan Gubar, Carolyn Heilbrun, Annette Kolodny and Lillian Robinson. None of the selections is an excerpt and all are concerned primarily with the theoretical rather than the practical implications of canon formation, feminist aesthetics, female culture, gender defined language or sexual preferences. This is the first anthology to single out as its concern feminist literary theory. Because of the quality and range of the selections it is likely to contribute significantly to the discussion in the next years. As one might expect, the essayists argue with the received standards for literary quality, with establishment literary theorists, with editors of anthologies who have excluded women writers, and with male dominated Departments of English.
    [Show full text]