Open Civcom Thesis Final.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open Civcom Thesis Final.Pdf THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE INTERCOLLEGE PROGRAM COMMUNITY MURALS AS PROCESSES OF COLLABORATIVE ENGAGEMENT: CASE STUDIES IN URBAN AND RURAL PENNSYLVANIA ELODY GYEKIS FALL 2009 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Art with honors in Civic and Community Engagement Reviewed and approved* by the following: Rosa A Eberly Associate Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences and English Thesis Supervisor Mary Lou Zimmerman Munn Senior Lecturer in Classics & Ancient Mediterranean Studies Honors Adviser *Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i Elody Gyekis Community Murals as Processes of Collaborative Engagement: Case Studies in Urban and Rural Pennsylvania Schreyer Honors College Senior Thesis Abstract: This thesis uses three community mural projects—two in inner-city Harrisburg and the Valley Roots Community Mural project in Millheim, Centre County—to analyze the impacts of collaborative community art. Contemporary technologies and materials that maximized collaborative community engagement were utilized in the mural-making processes. Local residents provided the visions for the themes and guided the designs, filled in the paint-by-number panels of the murals, helped to install the murals, and celebrated the unveiling. Community meetings, painting sessions, and unveiling ceremonies for these projects became opportunities for intergenerational and cross- cultural dialogue and relationship building. I discuss responses to the projects and analyze of community feedback in relation to an in-depth literature review of public art projects and related topics in the arts, communication, and social sciences. My analysis of formal and informal participant feedback and media coverage reveals three categories in which the mural project was highly successful for those who were engaged in it: the generation of social capital, the creation of amenities, and personal inspiration. The completed murals are lasting public art pieces—visual tributes to a collaborative community vision and each community's pride in the diverse physical and cultural aspects of its location and history. i Table of Contents Abstract …………………………………………………………………….. i Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………….. v Chapter 1 - Public Art and Community Murals ……………………………... 1 I. Introduction ……………………………………………………... 1 a. Defining my Exigency ……………………………………... 1 b. Introduction to Public Art and Community Murals ……………... 3 i. Definition of Public Art ……………………………... 3 ii. Necessity of Public Art ……………………………... 4 iii. History of Murals ……………………………………... 6 iv. The Philadelphia Mural Arts Program and Cloth Murals ...7 II. A Note on Terminology - Defining ―Community‖ and ―Public‖ ……..10 III. Evaluating the Impact of Community Murals ……………………….14 a. Defining Success ……………………………………………. 14 b. Literature Review – What Previous Studies have Shown ……. 15 IV. This Study ……………………………………………………………. 26 a. Maximizing Community Involvement …………………… 26 b. Project Goals …………………………………………………… 27 c. Organization of this Thesis ……………………………………. 29 Chapter 2 - Allison Hill Murals …………………………………………… 30 I. KPB – Summer Internship in Harrisburg ………………………. 30 II. Allison Hill Demographics ……………………………………... 32 III. The Mural Projects in Harrisburg ……………………………….. 34 ii a. Shared Ministries Mural: June-August 2005 ……………. 37 b. Mulberry Street Bridge Mural: May 2005-August 2006 …… 38 c. Derry Street Anti-Violence Mural: June-August 2006 …… 40 IV. Public Discourse …………………………………………… 42 Chapter 3 - Millheim Mural …………………………………………… 43 I. Promoting Civic Health …………………………………… 43 II. How it all Began …………………………………………… 44 III. Introduction to Millheim …………………………………… 47 IV. Valley Roots Community Mural Project …………………… 49 a. Gaining Support …………………………………………… 51 b. Funding the Mural …………………………………… 52 c. Creating a Collaborative Community Design …………… 53 d. Paint-by-number technique …………………………… 56 e. Unveiling the Mural …………………………………… 58 V. Analysis of Community Response to the Mural …………… 59 a. Mural Unveiling Comments …………………………… 59 b. Feedback …………………………………………………… 67 c. Resistance to the Mural …………………………………… 68 Chapter 4 - Reflection and Conclusion …………………………………… 72 I. Reflecting on Millheim and Allison Hill …………………………… 72 II. Critical to Success …………………………………………………… 75 III. Conclusion …………………………………………………………… 76 IV. Suggestions for Further Research …………………………………… 80 iii V. Final Note ………………………………………………………………. 83 Works Cited …………………………………………………………………… 84 Appendix A – Personal Email from Kent Twitchell ………………………….... 90 Appendix B – How to Paint a Community Mural Document …………………. 92 Appendix C – Photos of Shared Ministries Mural ……………………………. 124 Appendix D – Photos of Mulberry Street Bridge Mural ………………….. 125 Appendix E – Photos of Derry Street Mural ………………………………….. 129 Appendix F – Conference Presentations ……………………………………… 130 Appendix G – Harrisburg Mural Projects in the News ……………………….. 132 Appendix H – Valley Roots Project Proposal Pamphlet ……………………… 134 Appendix I – PSU Publications and Websites Featuring my Mural Projects … 136 Appendix J – Valley Roots Community Mural Budget ………………….. 147 Appendix K – Valley Roots Community Mural, Designs and Final Product … 149 Appendix L – Mural Unveiling Comments ………………………………….. 152 Appendix M – Excel File of Sorted Comments ………………………………. 165 Appendix N – Public Discourse about the Valley Roots Community Mural …. 167 Appendix O – Re: Steve. ……………………………………………………... 184 Academic Vita …………………………………………………………………. 185 iv Acknowledgments: I would like to thank Rosa Eberly, my thesis supervisor, for all of her guidance and support. I would like to thank my friends and family for their endless encouragement and participation in my projects. I also would like to thank the hundreds of people who participated in my mural projects, especially the dozens of people who volunteered many hours helping me to organize, fundraise, create, and install the murals. I also would like to thank Keep Pennsylvania Beautiful, Young People For, The Centre County Community Foundation, the Schreyer Honors College, and all the contributing businesses and individuals for helping to fund the mural projects. v Chapter 1 – Public Art and Community Murals Introduction Defining my Exigency Even before the current economic recession, arts programs and funding for the arts have seen continual decline in my lifetime. Music and art classes are being cut from public high schools as we struggle to prepare our students for standardized tests instead of giving them a well-rounded education. One of the many programs cut from the 2009- 2010 Pennsylvania State budget was a program that had changed the course of my life: the Pennsylvania Governor‘s School for the Arts. Attending the Pennsylvania Governor‘s School for the Arts (PGSA) as a sixteen- year-old art student was the first in many steps that brought art-making and community- building passionately into my life. As a rural high school student who did not have access to a very large or challenging art program, attending PGSA was profound. Not only was I pushed in the arts, but I was also introduced to interdisciplinary collaboration and exposed to a community of passionate, creative, encouraging, and positive teenagers and adults. In this stimulating context, my peers and I began to blossom into the motivated and talented people that we had the potential to be. I went back to PGSA in the summer of 2007 as a Resident Assistant and a Teaching Assistant, four years after attending the program. Watching the program transform hundreds of other teenagers into driven, 1 passionate, and creative contributors to society was an even more enlightening and affirming experience than my first had been. After attending PGSA as a student in 2003, I wanted to be challenged beyond what my small public high school had to offer me, artistically, intellectually, critically, socially and spiritually. I left high school early and entered an early-enrollment program at Penn State, signing up for a full schedule of academic and artistic classes. The summer after my first year at Penn State, uninterested in working a familiar job in my hometown and looking for meaningful employment, I serendipitously stumbled across an internship organizing and designing community murals in inner-city Harrisburg. Shortly after sending an inquiry email, I was interviewed and accepted for the position. I had no way of knowing at the time that this experience would lead me to many years of being involved in community mural projects. After two years of projects in Harrisburg experiencing the profound effects of community mural projects, I was inspired to formally study the impacts of community murals. I decided to continue doing community mural work and to organize another community mural as a research project for my honors thesis in Civic and Community Engagement. This time I chose to work in my own rural hometown of Millheim, Pennsylvania, using what I had learned from my experiences in Allison Hill to maximize community involvement and interaction throughout the project. This thesis uses my community mural projects as case studies for an analysis of the impacts of community murals. The analysis focuses on community feedback gathered from the Millheim mural. The process of creating a community mural physically transforms the community involved with a collaborative work of art that is beautiful and represents a shared vision. 2 With the loss of funding for PGSA and the continual cutting of art programs of all kinds,
Recommended publications
  • Fy21 Proposed Budget
    CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ORGANIZATION CHART (ALL FUNDS) BY PROGRAM FISCAL 2021 OPERATING BUDGET Department No. Mural Arts Program 50 Managing Directors Office Mural Arts Program Director 12 Jane Golden-Heriza 10 01 SECTION 7 Mural Arts Program 12 10 FY21 PROPOSED BUDGET ORGANIZATION FY20 FY21 FILLED BUDGETED 1 POS. 11/19 POSITIONS 71-53A (Program Based Budgeting Version) CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY FUND FISCAL 2021 OPERATING BUDGET Department No. Mural Arts Program 50 Fiscal 2019 Fiscal 2020 Fiscal 2020 Fiscal 2021 Increase Actual Original Estimated Proposed or No. Fund Class Description Obligations Appropriation Obligations Budget (Decrease) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) 01 100 Employee Compensation a) Personal Services 587,931 638,987 649,569 578,952 (70,617) b) Employee Benefits 200 Purchase of Services 1,779,296 1,860,615 1,895,615 1,425,610 (470,005) General 300 Materials and Supplies 400 Equipment 500 Contributions, etc. 800 Payments to Other Funds Total 2,367,227 2,499,602 2,545,184 2,004,562 (540,622) 100 Employee Compensation a) Personal Services b) Employee Benefits 200 Purchase of Services 300 Materials and Supplies 400 Equipment 500 Contributions, etc. 800 Payments to Other Funds Total 100 Employee Compensation a) Personal Services b) Employee Benefits 200 Purchase of Services 300 Materials and Supplies 400 Equipment 500 Contributions, etc. 800 Payments to Other Funds Total 100 Employee Compensation a) Personal Services b) Employee Benefits 200 Purchase of Services 300 Materials and Supplies 400 Equipment 500 Contributions, etc. 800 Payments to Other Funds Total 100 Employee Compensation a) Personal Services b) Employee Benefits 200 Purchase of Services 300 Materials and Supplies 400 Equipment 500 Contributions, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Exact Change
    Making Exact Change How U.S. arts-based programs have made a significant and sustained impact on their communities A Research Project of the Community Arts Network By William Cleveland, the Center for the Study of Art and Community Published by Art in the Public Interest November 2005 Making Exact Change How U.S. arts-based programs have made a significant and sustained positive impact on their communities © 2005 Art in the Public Interest ART IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST promotes information exchange, research and critical dialogue within the field of community-based arts. Its primary program is the Community Arts Network (CAN). http://www.communityarts.net Art in the Public Interest Linda Frye Burnham & Steven Durland, co-directors P.O. Box 68, Saxapahaw, NC 27340 This report is also available on the Web at: http://www.makingexactchange.org On the cover: Detail of a Village of Arts and Humanities mural project. Photo courtesy the Village of Arts and Humanities 4 Making Exact Change Making Exact Change Table of Contents Part One: Introduction . 6 Part Two: Case Studies . .11 CityKids . .12 GRACE (Grass Roots Art and Community Effort) . .21 Isangmahal Arts Kollective . .29 Manchester Craftsmen’s Guild . .36 Mural Arts Program . .47 Northern Lakes Center for the Arts . .55 Swamp Gravy . .64 Village of Arts and Humanities . .73 Wing Luke Asian Museum . .83 Zuni-Appalachian Exchange and Collaboration . .93 Part Three: Findings . .102 Part Four: Recommendations . .122 End Notes . .132 Appendices Appendix A: Request for Study Subjects . .134 Appendix B: Questions for Study Sites . .136 Project Personnel . .139 Making Exact Change 5 Introduction Part One Introduction In 1976, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Panel Pool 2
    FY18-19 PEER REVIEW PANELS Panel Applicants (November deadline) This list contains potential panelists to be added to the pool for peer review panels. Approved panelists may be called upon to serve on grant panels in FY2018-2019 or FY2019-2020. Click a letter below to view biographies from applicants with corresponding last name. A .............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 B ............................................................................................................................................................................... 9 C ............................................................................................................................................................................. 18 D ............................................................................................................................................................................. 31 E ............................................................................................................................................................................. 40 F ............................................................................................................................................................................. 45 G ............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • School of Art 2016–2017
    BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF YALE BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Periodicals postage paid New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut School of Art 2016–2017 School of Art 2016–2017 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 112 Number 1 May 15, 2016 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 112 Number 1 May 15, 2016 (USPS 078-500) The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, is published seventeen times a year (one time in May and October; three times in June and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and a∞rmatively and September; four times in July; five times in August) by Yale University, 2 Whitney seeks to attract to its faculty, sta≠, and student body qualified persons of diverse back- Avenue, New Haven CT 0651o. Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut. grounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment against Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, PO Box 208227, New Haven CT 06520-8227 status as a protected veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression. Managing Editor: Kimberly M. Go≠-Crews University policy is committed to a∞rmative action under law in employment of Editor: Lesley K. Baier women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, and protected veterans. PO Box 208230, New Haven CT 06520-8230 Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to Valarie Stanley, Director of the O∞ce for Equal Opportunity Programs, 221 Whitney Avenue, 3rd Floor, 203.432.0849.
    [Show full text]
  • Curating Now: Imaginative Practice/Public Responsibility Full Text Edited by Paula Marincola
    QUESTIONS OF PRACTICE Curating Now: Imaginative Practice/Public Responsibility Full Text Edited by Paula Marincola THE PEW CENTER FOR ARTS & HERITAGE / PCAH.US / @PEWCENTER_ARTS CURATING NOW: IMAGINATIVE PRACTICE/PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY OCT 14-15 2000 Paula Marincola Robert Storr Symposium Co-organizers Philadelphia Exhibitions Initiative Funded by The Pew Charitable Trusts Administered by The University of the Arts The Philadelphia Exhibitions Initiative is a granting program funded by The Pew Charitable Trusts and administered by The University of the Arts, Philadelphia, that supports exhibitions and accompanying publications.“Curating Now: Imaginative Practice/Public Responsibility” has been supported in part by the Pew Fellowships in the Arts’Artists and Scholars Program. Philadelphia Exhibitions Initiative 230 South Broad Street, Suite 1003 Philadelphia, PA 19102 215-985-1254 [email protected] www.philexin.org ©2001 Philadelphia Exhibitions Initiative All rights reserved ISBN 0-9708346-0-8 Library of Congress catalog card no. 2001 131118 Book design: Gallini Hemmann, Inc., Philadelphia Copy editing: Gerald Zeigerman Printing: CRW Graphics Photography: Michael O’Reilly Symposium and publication coordination: Alex Baker CONTENTS v Preface Marian Godfrey vii Introduction and Acknowledgments Paula Marincola SATURDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2000 AM 3 How We Do What We Do. And How We Don’t Robert Storr 23 Panel Statements and Discussion Paul Schimmel, Mari-Carmen Ramirez, Hans-Ulrich Obrist,Thelma Golden 47 Audience Question and Answer SATURDAY,
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Arts Initiative What We Want Is Here: Neighbor Hood
    WHAT WE WANT IS HERE: WE WANT WHAT WHAT WE WANT IS NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECTS 2012–2018 NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECTS HERE: NEIGHBOR HOOD PROJECTS 2012—2018 ASIAN ARTS INITIATIVE ARTS ASIAN ASIAN ARTS INITIATIVE CONTENTS Timeline PEARL STREET PROJECT 6 61 Introduction Gayle Isa 9 Advice From the Field 68 Towards Synergy and Transformation: Reflections on Arts and Cultural Organizations as Allies in Community Development and Planning Contributor Biographies Maria Rosario Jackson, Ph.D. 12 72 Poetics and Praxis of a City in Relation Roberto Bedoya 15 STAFF & BOARD 77 The Joy We Make: Culture and Relationships in Funders Urban Planning and Design Theresa Hwang 21 78 Social Practice Lab 50 Credits 80 2 Asian Arts Initiative 3 What We Want Is Here: Neighborhood Projects 2012—2018 TIMELINE 2012 AAI launches two new neigh- borhood programs, the Social Practice Lab Artist Residency, 2014 1997 AAI issues the first open call AAI moves out of Painted and the Pearl Street Project. Bride Art Center and into to artists and neighborhood the Gilbert Building at 1315 2005 members for Pearl Street Cherry Street. Our first Chinatown Micro-Projects, which are 2016– In/flux exhibition opens scheduled throughout the with a community block next year. party and walking tours of 2018 Guided by a Working Group 7 contemporary artists’ 2013 of diverse neighborhood projects installed throughout 1993 AAI celebrates the culmina- stakeholders, Asian Arts the neighborhood. Asian Arts Initiative (AAI) 2000 tion of the inaugural cohort Initiative publishes the is created at Painted Bride AAI’s Gallery program is of Social Practice Lab Artist generated by a group of People:Power:Place cultural Art Center in response to Residencies, and throws the plan and prepares to pilot community concerns about volunteers who install track first of many Pearl Street the Shared Spaces 共享空間 racial tension.
    [Show full text]
  • Camille Billops and James V. Hatch Archives at Emory University
    Camille Billops and James V. Hatch archives at Emory University Emory University Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library Atlanta, GA 30322 404-727-6887 [email protected] Digital Material Available in this Collection Descriptive Summary Title: Camille Billops and James V. Hatch archives at Emory University Call Number: Manuscript Collection No. 927 Extent: 47.25 linear feet (95 boxes), 12 oversized papers boxes and 16 oversized papers folders (OP), 6 extra oversized papers (XOP), AV Masters: 9.25 linear feet (9 boxes and LP1-4), and 10 GB born digital material (231 files) Abstract: The Camille Billops and James Hatch Archives at Emory University consists of a variety of materials relating to African American culture and art. Language: Materials entirely in English. Administrative Information Restrictions on Access Special Restrictions: Use copies have not been made for audiovisual material in this collection. Researchers must contact the Rose Library in advance for access to this material. Access to processed born digital materials is only available in the Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library (the Rose Library). Use of the original digital media is restricted. Terms Governing Use and Reproduction All requests subject to limitations noted in departmental policies on reproduction. Please note that some of the items in this collection are copies of materials held in other archival repositories. The Library will not provide researchers with copies of those items. Researchers wishing to obtain copies of these materials should contact the repository that owns the originals. Related Materials in Other Repositories Hatch-Billops Oral History at the City College of New York Emory Libraries provides copies of its finding aids for use only in research and private study.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2013 Art Works Grant Announcement
    National Endowment for the Arts — 2013 Spring Grant Announcement Art Works Discipline/Field Listings Project details are as of April 23, 2013. For the most up to date project information, please use the NEA's online grant search system. Art Works grants supports the creation of art that meets the highest standards of excellence, public engagement with diverse and excellent art, lifelong learning in the arts, and the strengthening of communities through the arts. Click the discipline/field below to jump to that area of the document. Arts Education Dance Design Folk & Traditional Arts Literature Local Arts Agencies Media Arts Museums Music Opera Presenting Theater & Musical Theater Visual Arts Some details of the projects listed are subject to change, contingent upon prior Endowment approval. Page 1 of 130 Arts Education Number of Grants: 103 Total Dollar Amount: $3,870,000 826 Boston, Inc. $20,000 Roxbury, MA To support Young Authors Book Program, an in-school literary arts program. Underserved high school students will receive one-on-one instruction from trained writers who will help them write, edit, and polish their work, which will be published in a professionally designed book. As many as 60 students, 5 writers, and 3 teachers will participate in the project. 826 Seattle $35,000 Seattle, WA To support Creating a Community of Young Authors, a free writing program. Project activities include writing workshops, field trips, student performances, and publication of student work. Alameda County Office of Education (aka Alliance for Arts Learning Leadership) $25,000 Hayward, CA To support professional development for whole-school arts integration at middle schools in Alameda County, California.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Arts Commission Mural Design Information Form LEAD
    San Francisco Arts Commission Mural Design Information Form LEAD ARTIST Sorell Tsui ADDRESS 3567 Lakeshore Ave. CITY STATE ZIP CODE Oakland, CA 94610 EMAIL [email protected] PHONE 510-565-0121 PROJECT COORDINATOR Erika Gee, Chinatown CCDC ADDRESS 1525 Grant Ave. CITY STATE ZIP CODE San Francisco, CA 94133 EMAIL [email protected] PHONE 415-984-1497 SPONSORING ORGANIZATION Chinatown Community Development Center ADDRESS 1525 Grant Ave. CITY STATE ZIP CODE San Francisco, CA 94133 EMAIL [email protected] PHONE 415-984-1497 FUNDING SOURCES Community Challenge Grant PROPOSED SITE (address, cross street ) 1201 Powell St (at Jackson), San Francisco, CA 941311 DISTRICT 3 MURAL TITLE: Chinese Pattern and Landscape Mural DIMENSIONS Left panel: 45 ft. height x 21 ft. width Right panel: 48 ft. height x 18 ft. 6 inches width. ESTIMATED SCHEDULE (start and completion dates) start June 1, 2021, end July 1, 2021 1. Proposal (describe proposed design, site and theme. Attach a separate document if needed). The mural design includes a California coastal landscape that has a Chinese feel. We have a strip of separation with a cloud design from the stone gate in the park. We believe incorporating design elements from the history of the park will add a cohesive element to the design that honors the past, while envisioning a future. This is an example of the concept in our mural design. We have included floral patterns with a jade background for the majority of the mural. We will use complimentary colors to highlight the landscape. 2. Materials and processes to be used for wall preparation, mural creation and anti-graffiti treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Mural Arts Program Revised Fiscal Year 2021 Budget
    MURAL ARTS PROGRAM MURAL ARTS PROGRAM REVISED FISCAL YEAR 2021 BUDGET TESTIMONY The revised FY21 Budget and FY21-25 Plan focuses on providing core services and targeting reductions to areas with the least impact on vulnerable populations and areas where others can fund or deliver services. DEPARTMENT FUNDING LEVELS General Fund Financial Summary by Class FY21 Original FY21 $ Difference FY20 Original FY20 Estimated Proposed Revised Proposed Original to Appropriations Obligations Appropriations Appropriations Revised Proposed Class 100 - Employee $638,987 $649,569 $597,069 $578,852 ($18,217) Compensation Class 200 - Purchase of $1,860,615 $1,895,615 $1,913,115 $1,425,610 ($487,505) Services $2,499,602 $2,545,184 $2,510,184 $2,004,562 ($505,722) GENERAL FUND FULL-TIME POSITIONS General Fund Full-Time Positions FY21 Difference FY20 Adopted November 2019 FY21 Original Revised Proposed Original to Budget Increment Run Proposed Budget Budget Revised Proposed Full-Time 12 12 11 10 (1) Positions Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Testimony 1 MURAL ARTS PROGRAM MURAL ARTS PROGRAM ORIGINAL FISCAL YEAR 2021 BUDGET TESTIMONY This testimony was prepared by the Mural Arts Program after the onset of COVID-19 and its impact on City government operations. It reflects the revised proposed FY21 budget and the department’s new operational plan. Additional post COVID-19 responses from the Department are listed in the next section. DEPARTMENT MISSION & PLANS Mission: Through participatory public art, Mural Arts Philadelphia inspires change in people, place, and practice, creating opportunity for a more just and equitable Philadelphia. Mural Arts Philadelphia envisions a world where all people have a say in the future of their lives and communities; where art and creative practice are respected as critical to sense of self and place; and where cultural vibrancy reflects and honors all human identities and experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Graffiti Phenomenon: a Study Around Jakarta Indonesia
    International Journal of u- and e- Service, Science and Technology Vol.10, No.8 (2017), pp.183-198 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijunesst.2017.10.8.17 A Review on Graffiti Phenomenon: A Study around Jakarta Indonesia Bambang Winarso Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama) Jl. Hang Lekir I No. 8, Senayan, Jakarta 10270, Indonesia [email protected] Abstract Graffiti is often regarded as a form of social disruption and symbol of disorder in a region. This phenomenon is growing in many urban areas around the world. This paper aims to provide a social overview of graffiti phenomenon occurring in developing countries such as Indonesia, especially in urban areas of Jakarta. Through a qualitative approach, a review is obtained that the graffiti phenomenon in Jakarta is more likely a manifestation of existence of the graffiti actors both by individuals and groups in the social environment where they thrive. On the other hand, the social environment includes the people who tend to neglect and are lack of responsiveness in capturing the symbolic interaction emerged from the graffiti phenomenon. Keywords: Graffiti; Social environment; Symbolic interaction; Urban phenomenon; Vandalism 1. Introduction Historically, graffiti has been used by experts to reconstruct the history of Pompeii and Ancient Greek society [1]. According to Alonso in [1], graffiti is defined as small scratches derived from Italian graffiare which means scratches. For thousands of years ancient cultures have known this kind of literature expression. Therefore, according to Alonso in [1] graffiti can help unlock a unique insight into the society. However, nowadays, graffiti is more precisely defined as an act of vandalism that damages the property of others.
    [Show full text]
  • PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA Mural Arts Program Engages Community Members in Murals That Improve Aesthetics and Transform Neighborhoods
    PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA Mural Arts Program engages community members in murals that improve aesthetics and transform neighborhoods “Murals work on a symbolic level, providing opportunities for communities to express concerns, values, and aspirations: their yearning to be free of violence and fear; their hope to create a better world for themselves and their children; their desire to remember those who were overcome or who overcame...They are our dreams manifest.” —JANE GOLDEN, DIRECTOR MURAL ARTS PROJECT, FOREWORD PHILADELPHIA MURALS AND THE STORIES THEY TELL PHILADELPHIA MURALS AND THE STORIES THEY TELL PHILADELPHIA MURALS AND THE STORIES IN SECRET BOOK, 1999. ervent in the belief that public art has the power support civic pride. MAP is responsible for the creation F to eradicate urban blight and create community of over 2000 murals since the mid 1980’s.1 change, Philadelphia’s Mural Arts Program (MAP) fol- lows a community participatory model to transform THE PLACE graffiti-scarred walls into scenic views in diverse neigh- borhoods citywide. In the process of creating murals MAP operates primarily in low-income neighbor- that feature portraits of community heroes, tell neigh- hoods across Philadelphia, reaching residents of all races borhood stories or display abstract designs, MAP fos- and ethnicities. As the popularity of murals increases ters connections among neighbors and word spreads, murals are now and forges new bonds between res- being created in wealthier neigh- idents (including at-risk youth), borhoods, as well. During the first “People have an intuitive desire professional artists, and mural fun- five years of the program, murals to have art around, and murals ders.
    [Show full text]