A Critical Analysis of the Policing of Counterfeit Goods in South Africa
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE POLICING OF COUNTERFEIT GOODS IN SOUTH AFRICA by GODFREY THENGA submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the subject CRIMINAL JUSTICE at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: PROF. DT MASILOANE OCTOBER 2018 DECLARATION I declare that the thesis “A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE POLICING OF COUNTERFEIT GOODS IN SOUTH AFRICA” is my own work, that I have acknowledged all the sources used, and quotations included in this thesis by means of a complete reference list. I further declare that I submitted the thesis to originality checking software and that it falls within the acceptable requirements for originality. I further declare that I have not previously submitted this work, or part of it, for examination at Unisa for another qualification or at any other higher education institution. The researcher understands and adhered to the standards on research ethics as proposed by the human Sciences Research Council. Signed __________________ Date: 01 October 2018 (G Thenga) i COPYRIGHT Copyright resides in the University of South Africa (Unisa) and Godfrey Thenga. In terms of Copyright Act 98 of 1978, no part of this material may be produced and stored in any retrieval system, be transmitted in any form or be published, redistributed or screened by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without prior written permission from UNISA and Godfrey Thenga. However, permission to use any material in this work that is derived from other sources must be obtained from original source. For academic and research purposes, original information may be used and referred to so long as it is properly referenced and the source acknowledged as such. © UNISA 2018 ii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ARIPO : African Regional Industrial Property Organisation AU : African Union COPIS : Anti-Counterfeit and Piracy Information System DPCI : Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation DTI : Department of Trade and Industry EU : European Union FATF : Financial Action Task Team GATT : General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade IACP : International Association of Chiefs of Police ILO : International Labour Organisation ILP : Intelligence Led-policing INTERPOL : International Criminal Police Organisation KYC : Know Your Customer NDP : National Development Plan NCCS : National Crime Combatting Strategy NPA : National Prosecuting Authority OAU : Organisation of African Unity OEDC : Organisation for Economic Development and Co-operation SADC : Southern African Development Community SAPS : South African Police Service SARS : South African Revenue Services SARPCO : Southern African Regional Police Chiefs Co-operation Organisation iii TRIPS : Agreement on the Trade-Related Aspects of International Property Rights UK : United Kingdom UNODC : United Nations office on Drugs and Crime USA : United States of America WHO : World Health Organisation WTO : World Trade Organisation iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Papa GOD for His abounding graces and mercies. It is befitting to take this opportunity to express my sincere gratitude to the following persons and organisations for having played a pivotal role in the completion of this thesis: My Promoter, Prof. David Masiloane for his support and guidance. Indeed maturity, experience and dedication count and you have made this journey exciting to me. To my guide and role model in life (Sister Olga), thank you for showing and introducing me to Mudzimu- you were magnificent and I will eternally be indebted to The Light; To my wife and children – John, Esther and niece Precious – you are splendid; To my mother who has been a pillar of support throughout my education; The (SAPS) management; The members of the SAPS in Gauteng, Mpumalanga, Kwa-Zulu Natal and Western Cape provinces; The Department of Trade and Industry’s management and staff; The National Prosecution Authority’s management and staff; To Intellectual Property Firms - Adams & Adams and Spoor & Fisher; To IP Protection Organisations – South African Institute of Intellectual Property Law, The Recording Industry Of South Africa, Southern African Federation Against Copyright Theft and Film and Publication Board; Special thanks to IP Attorneys - Paul Ramara, Godfrey Budeli and Charl Potgieter; To the Professional Language Editor, Jack Chokwe; Finally, I would like to thank all my colleagues at UNISA especially College of law staff. The glittering earth is unable to encompass man perpetually. Obedience is better than sacrifice – by mukomana Olga. v SUMMARY The researcher conducted a critical analysis of the policing of counterfeit crime in South Africa. A pure qualitative research design and approach was adopted. A literature review, interviews and observations were conducted to provide an overview of this problem nationally and internationally. Interview schedules were designed with pre-determined open-ended questions, which allowed participants to explain their perceptions, opinions and viewpoints on the policing of counterfeit in South Africa. Some of the designed questions were mailed to respondents. Questions were posed to members of the Specialised Commercial Crime Unit, members of the South African Police Service’s Crime Prevention Unit, members of the Department of Trade and Industry who deal with counterfeit, prosecutors who normally prosecute counterfeit cases, brand owners/holders/representatives, and attorneys who assist in the policing of counterfeit crime. The findings of this study informed the proposed recommendations for preventative and reactive response mechanisms. These proposed recommendations suggest ways of improving efficiency and effectiveness in policing counterfeit in South Africa. KEY TERMS: Policing of counterfeit and piracy, modus operandi in committing counterfeit, intellectual property crime, organised crime in counterfeit, use of intelligence led policing, private public partnership, misrepresentation to disguise the truth, money laundering to hide proceeds of crime, theories of crime and theories of punishment in counterfeiting and piracy, adjudication of counterfeiting and piracy, counterfeiting investigation process, sanctions in counterfeit and piracy. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE CHAPTER ONE: GENERAL ORIENTATION 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 THE BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY .......................................................................................... 2 1.3 PROBLEM STATEMENT ................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 THE RESEARCH QUESTION ........................................................................................................ 7 1.5 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................. 7 1.6 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY .......................................................................................... 8 1.6.1 Value for academia .................................................................................................................... 9 1.6.2 Value for the business sector ................................................................................................... 9 1.6.3 Value for role players in the criminal justice system ............................................................. 9 1.6.4 Value for the community ......................................................................................................... 10 1.7 DEMARCATION OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................ 10 1.7.1 Population demarcation .......................................................................................................... 11 1.7.1.1 Overview of the Specialised Commercial Crime units ................................................ 11 1.7.2 Time demarcation .................................................................................................................... 12 1.7.3 Paradigm demarcation ............................................................................................................ 12 1.7.4 Geographical demarcation ...................................................................................................... 13 1.8 DEFINITION OF KEY THEORETICAL CONCEPTS ................................................................. 13 1.8.1 Policing ...................................................................................................................................... 13 1.8.2 Counterfeit and piracy ............................................................................................................. 14 1.8.3 Trademark ................................................................................................................................. 14 1.8.4 Intellectual property ................................................................................................................. 14 1.8.5 Brand and brand holder/brand representative ..................................................................... 15 1.8.6 Organised crime ....................................................................................................................... 15 1.8.7 Intelligence led-policing ........................................................................................................... 15 vii 1.8.8 Crime