Vorstellung Ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vorstellung Ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Karthäusernelke, Dianthus carthusianorum fast immer krautig Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: fast immer krautig – viele Annuelle Frühlings-Spark, Spergula morisonii 1 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: fast immer krautig – viele Annuelle – einige Polsterpflanzen Stängelloses Leimkraut, Silene acaulis Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: fast immer krautig – viele Annuelle – einige Polsterpflanzen – einige Halophyten Salzmiere, Honckenya peploides 2 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Gras-Sternmiere, Stellaria graminea Wichtigste Merkmale: Blätter meist gegenständig Blätter häufig sitzend, Blattgrund häufig verwachsen Stipeln meist fehlend Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Stachelsamiger Spärkling, Spergularia echinosperma Blätter meist gegenständig Blätter häufig sitzend, Blattgrund häufig verwachsen Stipeln meist fehlend (selten klein, häutig = Subfam. Paronychioideae) Blattspreite stets einfach und ganzrandig 3 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Blätter meist gegenständig Blätter häufig sitzend, Blattgrund häufig verwachsen Stipeln meist fehlend (selten klein, häutig = Subfam. Paronychioideae) Blattspreite stets einfach und ganzrandig Blütenstände cymös, meist Dichasien Wasserdarm, Myosoton aquaticum Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) Filziges Hornkraut, Cerastium tomentosum 4 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) – selten 4-zählig Niederliegendes Mastkraut, Sagina procumbens Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Weiße Lichtnelke, Silene latifolia Wichtigste Merkmale: Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) – selten 4-zählig – selten eingeschlechtig 5 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) – häufig Kelch verwachsen = Subfam. Caryophylloideae Taubenkropf, Silene vulgaris Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) – häufig Kelch verwachsen = Subfam. Caryophylloideae – Krone manchmal fehlend Ausdauernder Knäuel,Scleranthus perennis 6 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wasserdarm, Wichtigste Merkmale: Myosoton aquaticum Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) – häufig Kelch verwachsen = Subfam. Caryophylloideae – Krone manchmal fehlend – Kronblätter häufig tief gespalten Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Kuckuckslichtnelke, Lychnis flos-cuculi Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) – häufig Kelch verwachsen = Subfam. Caryophylloideae – Krone manchmal fehlend – Kronblätter häufig tief gespalten 7 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Nebenkrone Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) Platte Nagel – häufig Kelch verwachsen = Subfam. Caryophylloideae – Krone manchmal fehlend – Kronblätter häufig tief gespalten, nicht selten genagelt, manchmal mit Nebenkrone Rote Lichtnelke, Silene dioica Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: Nebenkrone K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) – häufig Kelch verwachsen = Subfam. Caryophylloideae – Krone manchmal fehlend – Kronblätter häufig tief gespalten, nicht selten genagelt, manchmal mit Nebenkrone Kronen-Lichtnelke, Lychnis coronaria 8 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Stachelsamiger Spärkling, Wichtigste Merkmale: Spergularia echinosperma Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) – Stamina manchmal obdiplostemon verschoben Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Vogelmiere, Stellaria media Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) – Stamina manchmal obdiplostemon verschoben – Stamina oft < 10; häufig 5 oder 3 – Karpelle oft < 5; häufig 3 oder 2 9 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) – Stamina manchmal obdiplostemon verschoben – Stamina oft < 10; häufig 5 oder 3 – Karpelle oft < 5; häufig 3 oder 2 stets so viele Griffel wie Karpelle Buschnelke, Dianthus seguieri Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Wichtigste Merkmale: Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) (sekundär) freie Zentralplazenta; Septen anfangs noch angelegt Jupiternelke, Lychnis flos-jovis 10 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Rote Lichtnelke, Wichtigste Merkmale: Silene dioica Blüten radiär, vielgestaltig, oft vereinfacht ausgehend von: K 5 C 5 A 5 + 5 G (5) (sekundär) freie Zentralplazenta; Septen anfangs noch angelegt Kapsel, meist Zähnchenkapsel Agrostemma githago Lychnis coronaria Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Umfang und Verbreitung: ca. 90 Gattungen, ca. 2300 Arten weltweit; Schwerpunkt gemäßigte Gebiete der Nordhalbkugel bei uns 28 Gattungen, ca. 130 Arten Pfriemen-Mastkraut, Sagina subulata 11 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Nutzung: Dianthus barbatus viele Zierpflanzen, z.B. – Dianthus spp. Nelken – Cerastium spp. Hornkräuter – Gypsophila paniculata Schleierkraut – Lychnis spp. Lichtnelken Dianthus superbus Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Nutzung: viele Zierpflanzen, z.B. – Dianthus spp. Nelken – Cerastium spp. Hornkräuter – Gypsophila paniculata Schleierkraut – Lychnis spp. Lichtnelken Cerastium tomentosum 12 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Nutzung: viele Zierpflanzen, z.B. – Dianthus spp. Nelken – Cerastium spp. Hornkräuter – Gypsophila paniculata Schleierkraut – Lychnis spp. Lichtnelken Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Nutzung: viele Zierpflanzen, z.B. – Dianthus spp. Nelken – Cerastium spp. Hornkräuter – Gypsophila paniculata Schleierkraut – Lychnis spp. Lichtnelken Lychnis chalcedonica ‘Brennende Liebe‘ 13 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse außerdem viele Unkräuter, z.B. – Agrostemma githago Kornrade – Cerastium spp. Hornkräuter – Spergula spp. Spark – Stellaria media Vogelmiere Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse außerdem viele Unkräuter, z.B. – Agrostemma githago Kornrade – Cerastium spp. Hornkräuter – Spergula spp. Spark – Stellaria media Vogelmiere Cerastium fontanum 14 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse außerdem viele Unkräuter, z.B. – Agrostemma githago Kornrade – Cerastium spp. Hornkräuter – Spergula spp. Spark – Stellaria media Vogelmiere Spergula arvensis Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse außerdem viele Unkräuter, z.B. – Agrostemma githago Kornrade – Cerastium spp. Hornkräuter – Spergula spp. Spark – Stellaria media Vogelmiere 15 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse systematische Einordnung: Asteridae Dicotyle – Kern-Eudicotyle Caryophyllales s.lat. Caryophyllales s.l. Berberidopsidales (= „Caryophyllidae“) Santalales Kern-Eudicotyle Rosidae Gunnerales Vitales Buxales Saxifragales Trochodendrales Dilleniales Proteales Sabiales Ranunculales Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse systematische Einordnung: Dicotyle – Kern-Eudicotyle Caryophyllales s.str. Caryophyllales s.l. Physenaceae (= „Caryophyllidae“) Asteropeiaceae Caryophyllales s.str. Simmondsiaceae (= „Centrospermen“) Rhabdodendraceae Asteridae Polygonaceae Caryophyllales s.lat. Berberidopsidales Plumbaginaceae Santalales Rosidae Frankeniaceae Vitales Saxifragales Tamaricaceae Dilleniales Carnivoren-Gruppe 16 Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse systematische Einordnung: „Centrospermen“ Dicotyle – Kern-Eudicotyle vorherrschende Merkmale: Caryophyllales s.l. oft anomales sekundäres Dickenwachstum (= „Caryophyllidae“) Blätter einfach, ganzrandig, ohne Stipeln Caryophyllales s.str. Siebröhrenplastiden mit Proteinfilamenten (= „Centrospermen“) und zentralem Proteinkristalloid Caryophyllales s.str. Betalaine vorhanden, Ferulasäure in Physenaceae unverholzten Zellwänden Asteropeiaceae Simmondsiaceae Gynoeceum einfächrig, Rhabdodendraceae freie Zentralplazenta Polygonaceae Plumbaginaceae Samenanlagen campylotrop Frankeniaceae Tamaricaceae Perisperm Carnivoren-Gruppe Vorstellung ausgewählter Familien Caryophyllaceae = Nelkengewächse Cactaceae Anacampseros-Gruppe Portulacaceae s.str. systematische Einordnung: Talinaceae Didiereaceae Dicotyle – Kern-Eudicotyle Basellaceae Caryophyllales s.l. Montiaceae (= „Caryophyllidae“) Halophytaceae Molluginaceae Caryophyllales s.str. Nyctaginaceae Sarcobataceae Phytolaccaceae Caryophyllales s.str. Aizoaceae Physenaceae Barbeuiaceae Asteropeiaceae Simmondsiaceae Lophiocarpaceae Rhabdodendraceae Limeaceae Polygonaceae Stegnospermataceae Plumbaginaceae Amaranthaceae s.l. Frankeniaceae Tamaricaceae Achatocarpaceae Carnivoren-Gruppe Caryophyllaceae 17.
Recommended publications
  • Identification of White Campion (Silene Latifolia) Guaiacol O-Methyltransferase Involved in the Biosynthesis of Veratrole, a Key Volatile for Pollinator Attraction
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 Identification of white campion (Silene latifolia) guaiacol O-methyltransferase involved in the biosynthesis of veratrole, a key volatile for pollinator attraction Gupta, Alok K ; Akhtar, Tariq A ; Widmer, Alex ; Pichersky, Eran ; Schiestl, Florian P Abstract: BACKGROUND: Silene latifolia and its pollinator, the noctuid moth Hadena bicruris, repre- sent an open nursery pollination system wherein floral volatiles, especially veratrole (1, 2-dimethoxybenzene), lilac aldehydes, and phenylacetaldehyde are of key importance for floral signaling. Despite the important role of floral scent in ensuring reproductive success in S. latifolia, the molecular basis of scent biosyn- thesis in this species has not yet been investigated. RESULTS: We isolated two full-length cDNAs from S. latifolia that show similarity to rose orcinol O-methyltransferase. Biochemical analysis showed that both S. latifolia guaiacol O-methyltransferase1 (SlGOMT1) S. latifolia guaiacol O-methyltransferase2 (SlGOMT2) encode proteins that catalyze the methylation of guaiacol to form veratrole. A large Km value difference between SlGOMT1 ( 10 M) and SlGOMT2 ( 501 M) resulted that SlGOMT1 is31-fold more catalytically efficient than SlGOMT2. qRT-PCR expression analysis showed that theSlGOMT genes are specifically expressed in flowers and male S. latifolia flowers had 3- to 4-folds higher levelof GOMT gene transcripts than female flower tissues. Two related cDNAs, S. dioica O-methyltransferase1 (SdOMT1) and S. dioica O-methyltransferase2 (SdOMT2), were also obtained from the sister species Silene dioica, but the proteins they encode did not methylate guaiacol, consistent with the lack of ver- atrole emission in the flowers of this species.
    [Show full text]
  • Section Elisanthe)
    POPULATION GENETICS AND SPECIATION IN THE PLANT GENUS SILENE (SECTION ELISANTHE) by ANDREA LOUISE HARPER A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Biosciences The University of Birmingham 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis is concerned with speciation and population genetics in the plant genus Silene (section Elisanthe). The introductory chapter is a literature review covering characteristics of the species studied, and the current literature on their evolutionary dynamics and population genetics. The second and third chapters cover techniques used in all experiments, such as DNA extraction, sequencing and genotyping protocols, and explain the rationale behind the initial experimental design. The fourth chapter focuses on the multi-locus analysis of autosomal gene sequences from S. latifolia and S. dioica. The relationship between the two species was investigated using various analyses such as isolation modeling and admixture analysis providing estimates of evolutionary distance and extent of historical gene flow. The maintenance of the species despite frequent hybridization at present-day hybrid zones is discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Plant List 1
    2020 issima Introductions Sesleria nitida Artemisia lactiflora ‘Smoke Show’ Succisella inflexa 'Frosted Pearls' Impatiens omeiana ‘Black Ice’ Thalictrum contortum Kniphofia ‘Corn Dog’ Thalictrum rochebrunianum var. grandisepalum Kniphofia ‘Dries’ Tiarella polyphylla (BO) Kniphofia ‘Takis Fingers’ Verbascum roripifolium hybrids Persicaria amplexicaulis ‘Ruby Woo’ Veronica austriaca 'Ionian Skies' Sanguisorba ‘Unicorn Tails’ Sanguisorba obtusa ‘Tickled Pink’ Stock Woody and Herbaceous Perennials, New & Returning for 2020 indexed alphabetically: Alchemilla alpina Acanthus ‘Summer Beauty’ Aletris farinosa Acanthus Hollard’s Gold’ Anemone nemorosa ‘Vestal’ Acanthus syriacus Anemone nemorosa Virescens Actaea pachypoda Anemone ranunculoides Actaea rubra leucocarpa Anemone seemannii Adenophora triphylla Berkheya purpurea Pink Flower Agastache ‘Linda’ Berkheya species (Silver Hill) Agastache ‘Serpentine’ Boehmeria spicata 'Chantilly' Ajuga incisa ‘Blue Enigma’ Callirhoe digitata Amorphophallus konjac Carex plantaginea Anemonella thalictroides ‘Cameo’ Carex scaposa Anemonella thalictroides ‘Oscar Schoaff’ Deinanthe caerulea x bifida Anemonopsis macrophylla – dark stems Dianthus superbus var. speciosus Anemonopsis macrophylla – White Flower Digitalis ferruginea Angelica gigas Disporum sessile ‘Variegatum’ Anthemis ‘Cally Cream’ Echium amoenum Anthericum ramosum Echium russicum Arisaema fargesii Echium vulgare Arisaema ringens Erigeron speciosus (KDN) Arisaema sikokianum Eriogonum annuum (KDN) Artemisia lactiflora ‘Elfenbein’ Geranium psilostemon
    [Show full text]
  • PLANT LIST for POLLINATORS Part 1 – a Concise List of Suggested Garden Plants That Are Attractive to Pollinating Insects
    THE ACTION PLAN FOR POLLINATORS SUGGESTED PLANT LIST FOR POLLINATORS Part 1 – A concise list of suggested garden plants that are attractive to pollinating insects This is a list of suggested garden plants. We have only selected flowers which are garden- worthy, easily obtainable, well-known, and widely acknowledged as being attractive to pollinating insects. In some case we have given extra comments about garden- worthiness. This is intended as a clear and concise short list to help gardeners; it is not intended to be comprehensive and we have avoided suggesting plants which are difficult to grow or obtain, or whose benefit to pollinators is still a matter for debate. We have omitted several plants that are considered to have invasive potential, and have qualified some others on the list with comments advising readers how to avoid invasive forms. PLANT ANGELICA (Angelica species). Attractive to a range of insects, especially hoverflies and solitary bees. AUBRETIA (Aubrieta deltoides hybrids). An important early nectar for insects coming out of hibernation. BELLFLOWER (Campanula species and cultivars). Forage for bumblebees and some solitary bees. BETONY (Stachys officinalis). Attractive to bumblebees. Butterfly Conversation’s Awarded the Royal Horticultural Top Butterflys Society’s ‘Award of Garden Nectar Plants. Merit’. PLANT BIRD’S FOOT TREFOIL (Lotus corniculatus). Larval food plant for Common Blue, Dingy Skipper and several moths. Also an important pollen source for bumblebees. Can be grown in gravel or planted in a lawn that is mowed with blades set high during the flowering period. BOWLES’ WALLFLOWER (Erysimum Bowles Mauve). Mauve perennial wallflower, long season nectar for butterflies, moths and many bee species.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Campion Date: October 2017 by Misha Norland, Mani Norland & the School of Homeopathy
    Orchard Leigh · Rodborough Hill · Stroud · Gloucestershire · England · GL5 3SS T: +44 (0)1453 765 956 · E: [email protected] www.homeopathyschool.com Proving: Red Campion Date: October 2017 By Misha Norland, Mani Norland & The School of Homeopathy. Seven provers (six female, one male). Common name: Red campion Scientific name: Silene dioica Family: Caryophyllaceae Habit: attractive medium to tall perennial plant with a downy stem. Leaves: opposite pairs, with hairs on the leaf. Flowers: pink-red in colour with five petals that are fused at their base forming a tube that is surrounded by a purple-brown calyx. Red campion is dioecious, a botanical term, meaning the male and female flowers grow on separate plants, hence the species name dioica. The flowers of red campion are important for various pollinating insects including bees, butterflies and hover flies. Where: native. Look for this species in lightly shaded areas in woodland, along hedgerows, fields, ditches and roadside verges. This species is an ancient woodland indicator, so may give a clue to the history of a wood. When: a perennial or biennial, it flowers from May to September. Medicinal: traditional medicines used red campion seeds to treat snakebites. Folklore and art: a noticeable flower the red campion has been mentioned in various poems, for example ‘Summer Woods’ by the poet Mary Howitt. Red campion’s genus name Silene probably derives from the Greek word sialon, which means saliva in reference to the gummy exudate occurring on the stems. It may also derive from Silenus, teacher, faithful companion, and foster father of Dionysus (Greek god of wine) who was covered with foam, referencing the gummy exudate commonly found on stems.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Reference Collection (331KB)
    Botanical reference collection FAMILY STACE accession SPECIES VERNACULAR NAME 2 Eccremocarpus scaber ? Chilean Glory flower 3 Capparis spinosa Caper 4 Carica papaya Pawpaw 7 Passiflora sp. Passionflower 8 Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm 9 Podophyllum emodi Himalayan May Apple 10 Styrax officinalis Benzoe 1 Asclepias tuberosa Butterfly weed FAMILY STACE ACANTHACEAE accession SPECIES VERNACULAR NAME 1242 Acanthus spinosus Spiny Bear's-breeches FAMILY STACE ACERACEAE accession SPECIES VERNACULAR NAME 293 Acer pseudoplatanus Sycamore 1757 Acer campestre Field maple 1749 Acer campestre Field Maple 297 Acer nepolitanum 296 Acer campestre Field Maple 294 Acer campestre Field Maple 292 Acer monspessulanus Montpelier Maple 295 Acer campestre Field Maple FAMILY STACE AIZOACEAE accession SPECIES VERNACULAR NAME 1668 Carpobrotus edulis Hottentot-fig FAMILY STACE ALISMATACEAE accession SPECIES VERNACULAR NAME 1050 Alisma plantago-aquatica Water-plantain 1051 Alisma plantago-aquatica Water-plantain 19 August 2005 Page 1 of 63 FAMILY STACE AMARANTHACEAE accession SPECIES VERNACULAR NAME 1673 Amaranthus albus White Pigweed 1672 Amaranthus hybridus Green Amaranth 227 Amaranthus retroflexus Common Amaranth 226 Amaranthus hybridus Green Amaranth 225 Amaranthus caudatus viridis Love-lies-bleeding FAMILY STACE ANACARDIACEAE accession SPECIES VERNACULAR NAME 1239 Pistacia lentiscus Mastic 1240 Pistacia terebinthus Terebrinth FAMILY STACE APIACEAE accession SPECIES VERNACULAR NAME 1813 Carum Caraways 562 Bupleurum rotundifolium Thorow-wax 561 Conium maculatum
    [Show full text]
  • WLGF Pollinator Planting List
    Suggested Plant List for Pollinators, September 2014 This list has been produced by Jan Miller on behalf of the North Wales Wildlife Trust and Marc Carlton on behalf of the Wildlife Gardening Forum, at the request of the Welsh Government’s Pollinator Task Force. The authors recognise that producing planting lists for pollinators is not a straightforward exercise. There are still many areas where further research is required in order to improve our understanding of the needs of pollinating insects and the best planting schemes to cater for them. One of the Wildlife Gardening Forum’s aims is to promote more evidence-based research to increase our knowledge and understanding of this subject. This list is based on the compilers’ personal experience over many years as gardeners and naturalists, and incorporates Jan’s work investigating plants for butterflies on behalf of Butterfly Conservation and uses their data sent in by members over twenty years. The list includes a selection of forage plants useful for adult butterflies, moths, hoverflies, bumblebees and solitary bees, which together make up the vast majority of pollinators in Wales. Plants recommended as larval food plants for butterflies and some moths have also been included. Specialised lists of flowers that are recommended as forage for honeybees have been published for many years within the beekeeping community and so we have not specifically covered honeybees in our list, although many of the flowers on our list will be used by honeybees. The list is in two parts. The first part is a list of suggested garden plants. We have only selected flowers which are garden-worthy, easily obtainable, well-known, and widely acknowledged as being attractive to pollinating insects.
    [Show full text]
  • When Bees Exploit Plants: Nectar Robbery Nicholas Charlton, University of Bristol, [email protected] ©Nicholas Charlton
    Feedback 50 June 2011 When bees exploit plants: Nectar robbery Nicholas Charlton, University of Bristol, [email protected] ©Nicholas Charlton he amazing variety and beauty of flowers we see wasting energy on producing nectar, but still benefit in our gardens is partly due to the relationship from pollination. Tbetween plants and their pollinators. Through millions of years of evolution, insects have adapted to There is another example of a ‘cheater’ taking advan- use flowers and plants have adapted to use insects. By tage of the situation, but with the roles reversed. Some producing a sugary reward in the form of nectar, plants species of bees have learnt to steal nectar from flowers attract insects to their flowers and use those insects to without pollinating them. To do this, the bee will make carry their pollen. The plants benefit from having their a hole in the flower near to the source of the nectar. This pollen spread over greater distances and with much makes it possible for bees with short tongues to reach more accuracy than if transported by wind. The insects nectar in long flowers which would normally be too benefit by gaining a source of high energy food in the deep to reach. The bee will then use the hole to extract form of nectar. This relationship can then be consid- the sugary reward without going near the stigmas and ered a mutual one, with both groups gaining an advan- stamens. This behaviour is described as nectar robbery. tage from the interaction. You may have seen bumble bees doing this in your gar- den as it has been observed on several different types In every mutualism, however, there may be opportuni- of plants, including red campion (Silene dioica), bleed- ties to take advantage of the situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Silene Sect. Melandrium and Allied Taxa
    ! "#! $ %&'(%)($ *++%,-,./,0 *+)%12.,.--0.1-,,. ! 3 4 3 3!!35.,6626 !" # $%&%&&'&'()&* * * + ,- . , / ",%&&',+ / *, " - 0 1 * $ 2 -," , 3)',4& , ,'5!6' 6774657 63, -* *8 0 1 " 9 * : * , * 8 ," . ; * : * , * * 0 1,- * * ,- " ,- ; : * . , < . ** * =>? . 6 +/ ,- ; , " * , ! , $ 8* " ,@ * * ,* ! * , - . * **, "# $= $ = =-"=- " "/" /+"%/+%/+%=> =? <-= @ %&' ( ) *+,-./# A" 8/ %&&' <== 37 63% 4 <='5!6' 6774657 63 ( ((( 6 &&!&30 (BB ,:,B C D ( ((( 6 &&!&31 Cover illustrations: Barry Breckling, Sara Gold, Kjell Lännerholm, Anja Rautenberg and Wiebke Rautenberg. List of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals. I Rautenberg, A., Filatov, D., Svennblad, B., Heidari, N., Oxel- man, B. (2008) Conflicting phylogenetic signals in the SlX1/Y1 gene in Silene. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8:299 II Rautenberg, A., Hathaway, L., Oxelman, B., Prentice, H. C. Phylogenetic relationships of Silene section Elisanthe (Caryo- phyllaceae) as inferred from chloroplast and nuclear DNA se- quences. Manuscript. III Rautenberg, A., Hathaway, L., Prentice, H. C., Oxelman, B. Phylogenetic relationships
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants
    Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants June 1, 2011 By Scott Mincemoyer Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT This checklist of Montana vascular plants is organized by Division, Class and Family. Species are listed alphabetically within this hierarchy. Synonyms, if any, are listed below each species and are slightly indented from the main species list. The list is generally composed of species which have been documented in the state and are vouchered by a specimen collection deposited at a recognized herbaria. Additionally, some species are included on the list based on their presence in the state being reported in published and unpublished botanical literature or through data submitted to MTNHP. The checklist is made possible by the contributions of numerous botanists, natural resource professionals and plant enthusiasts throughout Montana’s history. Recent work by Peter Lesica on a revised Flora of Montana (Lesica 2011) has been invaluable for compiling this checklist as has Lavin and Seibert’s “Grasses of Montana” (2011). Additionally, published volumes of the Flora of North America (FNA 1993+) have also proved very beneficial during this process. The taxonomy and nomenclature used in this checklist relies heavily on these previously mentioned resources, but does not strictly follow anyone of them. The Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants can be viewed or downloaded from the Montana Natural Heritage Program’s website at: http://mtnhp.org/plants/default.asp This publication will be updated periodically with more frequent revisions anticipated initially due to the need for further review of the taxonomy and nomenclature of particular taxonomic groups (e.g. Arabis s.l ., Crataegus , Physaria ) and the need to clarify the presence or absence in the state of some species.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Habitat Adaptation in Silene Dioica and S. Latifolia (Caryophyllaceae)
    Diss. ETH. No. 19050 Mechanisms of habitat adaptation in Silene dioica and S. latifolia (Caryophyllaceae) A dissertation submitted to the ETH ZURICH for the degree of DOCTOR OF SCIENCES presented by Adrien Favre Master of Sciences in Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution born October 18th, 1980 citizen of Switzerland accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Alex Widmer, examiner Dr. Sophie Karrenberg, co-examiner Prof. Dr. Heinz Müller-Schärer, co-examiner 2010 Table of contents Summary ..........................................................................................5 Résumé ..........................................................................................7 General introduction ………………………………………………………………..11 Thesis Chapter I Genetic and ecological differenciation in the hybridizing campions, Silene dioica and S. latifolia……………………………………………..…….23 Thesis Chapter II Stress tolerance in Silene dioica, S. latifolia (Caryophyllacea) and first-generation hybrids between them………………………………………………51 Thesis chapter III Reproductive barriers between the naturally hybridizing campions Silene dioica and S. latifolia (Caryophyllaceae): habitat adaptation and flowering phenology……………………...……………….73 Thesis chapter IV Mechanisms of habitat adaptation in S. dioica and S. latifolia (Caryophyllaceae)………………………89 General discussion ........................................................................................105 Acknowledgment ........................................................................................109 Curriculum vitae ........................................................................................111
    [Show full text]