Ruxandra Cesereanu

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ruxandra Cesereanu Caietele Echinox, vol. 19, 2010: Communism – Negotiation of Boundaries 315 Ruxandra Cesereanu The Romanian Anticommunist Revolution and the “Terrorists” of December 1989 Strange though it may appear – or ABSTRACT perhaps not so strange after all – the first to The so-called terrorist phenomenon marked talk about “terrorist actions” in December the bloodiest anti-communist revolution in 1989, was dictator Nicolae Ceauşescu, in Eastern Europe, i.e. the Romanian Revolu- his rallies against a would-be foreign plot a- tion. This study examines not only the nu- gainst Romania, which the dictator de- ances the phenomenon in question acquired nounced during the last meetings held with during and especially after the events of the members of the Political Executive December 1989, but also its manipulations Committee (Comitetul Politic Executiv) – at the hands of the various factions involved CPEx. The phrase was also employed by his in the events of December 1989, pinpointing brother, General Ilie Ceauşescu upon seve- the implications and consequences of these ral official visits the latter paid to various manipulations. garrisons in Cluj, Arad, Oradea, in De- KEYWORDS cember 1989, during the Timişoara insur- Romania; Nicolae Ceaşescu; Anticommunist rection. In the course of these visits, Ilie Revolution 1989; Securitate; Manipulation; Ceauşescu allegedly briefed the soldiers and Counterrevolution; Terrorists; Diversionists. the commanding officers by selling them stories about the existence of 2000 foreign RUXANDRA CESEREANU terrorists who were to carry out a massive ”Babeş-Bolyai” University, attack against Romania. It is very likely that Cluj-Napoca, Romania those who launched the phrase “terrorists”, [email protected] namely the forces that seized power after Ceauşescu’s flight, drew inspiration from the former dictator. The forces in question were the National Salvation Front (NSF), which became the new political body after the fall of Ceauşescu’s regime. Later on, at the garrison of Târgovişte, when charged with genocide and the murders that the so- called terrorists had committed among the civilians, spreading panic throughout the country, Ceauşescu, who was detained here, Ruxandra Cesereanu 316 suspected the terrorists persons spreading or publishing ru- were members of the mors, as well as confected or ten- Securitate, the notorious dentious information concerning the Political Police of communist Romania, exceptional situation [of the country even while considering himself betrayed by at the time], in order to mislead the the Securitate, despite the fact that, ironi- population and create panic (Siani- cally, the “terrorists” in question, who had Davies 2006: 211). instilled such fear in the population, could in that instance be but some of Ceauşescu’s It is important to mention from the loyalists. outset that the term terrorists was incor- The second person to use the term rectly used with reference to the identity of “terrorist” and the phrase “terrorist phenol- those persons who in December 1989 had menon”, between 22nd and 31st December, murdered both civilians and militaries, and was General Nicolae Militaru, whom NSF spread panic among the population. had appointed as head of the Ministry of Ivan Evseev, in his anthology Timi- National Defense (the acronym of which in şoara, 16-22 decembrie 19891, provides an Romanian is MApN). In an interview given apt definition of the term in circulation in on 23rd December 1989 to BBC, Ion Iliescu, December 1989. In his opinion, a “terrorist” who seized power after the overthrow of was Ceauşescu, thus becoming the new political leader, described terrorists as a word that was not employed in its original sense or with the purpose to certain groups of terrorists specially depict reality; rather, it was used to trained to fight against the people allude to a moral trait. (Evseev 1990: and to protect the dictator… fanatical 35) individuals acting with unpreceden- ted cruelty, firing shots at buildings A “terrorist” is typically defined as and citizens, and making victims a- someone who places bombs at strategic lo- mong militaries… (Siani-Davies cations, e.g. inside political institutions, 2006: 210). takes hostages from among the politicians, and murders politicians or public figures In an official statement that NSF known to have masterminded a social or released to the press on 28th December political movement. However, bombs are 1989, the new authorities defined the so- not always placed in key political in- called terrorists as stitutions. They will occasionally be planted in public locations with a view to kill as persons wearing fire arms and other many civilians as possible. The alleged ter- weapons of attack, ammunition, ex- rorists of December 1989 utterly failed to fit plosives, as well as any other kind of the profile of a terrorist, as defined above, destruction weapons or radio trans- hence the relative nature of the term and, mitters, and who fight against the consequently, the reason why it should not National Salvation Front and the vic- be employed with reference to the Roma- tors of free Romania. nian Revolution. This very incongruity prompted several analysts and historians of Furthermore, the label of “terrorists” the Romanian Revolution to use the term was also abusively applied to counter-revolutionaries instead, while others The Romanian Anticommunist Revolution and the “Terrorists” 317 preferred the term diversionists, which we seized power on consider to be the most appropriate. Brought 22nd December before the Commission of Inquiry into the 1989; Events of December 1989, Nicu Ceauşescu, - army officers, or of the Ministry of the dictator’s favourite son, detained after the Interior, USLA troops (the coun- the downfall of the Ceauşescu regime, ter-terrorism units), including offi- sardonically called the so-called terrorists cers of the Securitate or officers be- “aliens.” longing to the factions that supported Whatever their origin and identity, and approved of the Revolution. the so-called terrorists were depicted as Presumably, the officers in question some sort of “angels of death” or nocturnal acted on the orders of the NSF, with creatures who, from a symbolic point of General Nicolae Militaru, the new view, had acquired vampire-like attributes. leader of MApN, in command; They were believed to train in bunkers, to - members of the Army Intelligence move from one place to another by means Directorate (Romanian acronym DIA), of intricate underground passageways, and acting on the orders of the new poli- to possess sophisticated gruesome weapons. tical authorities that assumed power In what concerns the identity of the alleged following the overthrow of the Ceau- terrorists of December 1989, we hereby şescu regime; provide a rundown of the most relevant - the final theory claims that the ter- theories advanced by analysts of the phe- rorists never existed in the first place nomenon. In turn, terrorists may have been: and that the psychosis created around them was purposely fueled in order - members of the Securitate, loyal to to instill fear and psychological Ceauşescu, i.e. representatives of terror in the population. In this line certain nationalist factions; of line of argument, the casualties of - mainly, yet not exclusively, Roma- December 1989 were accounted for nian orphans raised by the Securitate as tactical errors, military negligence, and trained to serve in Ceauşescu’s or ricocheting bullets. Indeed it was personal guard; known by the nick- regrettable, it has to be said, that ma- name of “janissaries”, these orphans ny civilians had been given weapons were supposedly trained to become they did not know how to use, which kamikaze fighters; led to deadly accidents. - terrorists of Arab or Persian origin, e.g. Libians, Palestinians, Iranians, In the accounts of some analysts, etc.; several of the theories outlined above were - foreign agents, mainly Soviets and collapsed, precisely as a result of the am- Hungarians; biguous and elusive identity of the would-be - Soviet militaries recruited from a- terrorists. Constantin Lucescu, for instance, mong the people of Bessarabia, na- Counsel for the Defense in the Ceauşescu’s tive speakers of Romanian; trial, believed that the Securitate officers - independent snipers; and young orphan mercenaries trained to act - petty offenders from Romanian pri- as Ceauşescu’s personal guard formed com- sons, used either by the factions lo- mando units and disguised themselves as yal to Ceauşescu, or, on the contrary, officers of the Ministry of National Defense by the new political forces who in order to create confusion. In an attempt to Ruxandra Cesereanu 318 shed light on the myste- When questioned by the Commission ry surrounding the alle- of Inquiry into the Events of December ged terrorists, Sergiu 1989, General Iulian Vlad, former head of Nicolaescu, president of one of the two the Securitate, argued that the alleged Commissions of Inquiry into the Events of terrorists of the Romanian Revolution “were December 1989, argued that the entire not terrorists in the standard acceptation of terrorist scenario actually started as a the term.” Rather, they were “professional diversion orchestrated by the Securitate, killers” and few in number. According to whose purpose was aimed at maintaining Vlad, most of the people who died after 22nd authority and preventing the bloodshed. December were not killed by the so-called However, since the Army and the revolu- terrorists; rather, they died “by pure acci- tionaries
Recommended publications
  • Multiple Revolutions. Remediating And
    ACTA UNIV. SAPIENTIAE, FILM AND MEDIA STUDIES, 14 (2017) 95–130 DOI: 10.1515/ausfm-2017-0005 Multiple Revolutions. Remediating and Re-enacting the Romanian Events of 1989 Mónika Dánél Eötvös Loránd University (Budapest, Hungary) E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. This study proposes a twofold analysis: the presumable strategies of the December 1989 events in Romania and their complexity as it appears in later filmic re-enactments. These re-enactments as theatrical “translations” offer a rhetorical reading of past events, and can also be seen as practices of memories inscribed in the body. The events are interpreted in the duality of the archival image and the acoustic/gestural memory, where the latter is understood as an atmospheric (bodily) memory. The disorientation or disinformation caused by the technical conditions, the circulation or lack of images, the alternating silences and chanting on the street make the past events incomprehensible and medially dissonant.1 Keywords: re-enactments of historical events, films about December 1989 in Romania, the experience of space, body and memory. Simulation, Collective Imaginary, Inner Strategies In relation to the Romanian events, there is a consensus regarding three particularities: this was the bloodiest regime change in the Eastern European bloc; the television was a medium that influenced the events – and thus its historicity appears as a media event –, and the events were dispersive. The documents, interviews, hypotheses ever growing in number, the different narrative versions nuance and modify today’s memories. Their contradictory, dissonant nature indirectly also stages the reflexive understanding of the past event. Borrowing Michael Rothberg’s idea, the 1989 Romanian events become comprehensible today as an event that takes shape at the crossing point of the 1 This work was supported by the project entitled Space-ing Otherness.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Orizont
    REVIST~AUNIUNII SCRIITORILORDIN ROMÅNIA SERIENOU~,32PAGINI 29MARTIE2011 NR.3(1542), ANULXXIII 1LEU Editat`\ncolaborarecu333 CentrulpentruDialog Multicultural"Orizont" www.revistaorizont.ro LAUMBRA LAUMBRA DOAMNELOR DOAMNELOR |NFLOARE |NFLOARE LAUMBRA DOAMNELOR |NFLOARE LAUMBRA LAUMBRA DOAMNELOR DOAMNELOR |NFLOARE |NFLOARE SOLDATUNIVERSAL M~CONSIDERO LITERARN-AMS~FIU SCRIITOARE"META-ETNIC~" RUXANDRACESEREANU 5 GISHJEN Soldatliteraruniversalnuamcums`fiu, Amcrescutîngenera]iacareseîndoiade orice,sfidaautoritatea[iseîntrebadac`formele decâtdac`s-arconsiderac`ieslascen`deschis` PROIECTREALIZAT cuobaionet`saucuoarbalet`orim`carcuunsocialemo[teniteerauîntr-adev`rgeneratoare pistoldebuzunarsaucuunbriceag,ceeacenu devia]`.Îngenera]iaanterioar`,maimul]i–nu CUSPRIJINULPRIM~RIEI s-apreaîntâmplat. to]i–semul]umeaucucelised`dea.Dincauza MUNICIPIULUI Vietnamului,ami[c`riipentrudrepturileomului, TIMI{OARA{IAL EUROPA-OFAMILIEDE atitudineanoastr`afostunaderespingereastatus CONSILIULUILOCAL ASEM~N~RI quo-ului.Personal,amprinsdoarultimapartea M~D~LINADIACONU 4 mariiRevolu]iiaanilor'60.Apogeulafostprin TIMI{OARA,|NCADRUL Operspectiv`istoric`mailarg`sau,dac` 1968,iareuamterminatliceulîn1973.Fra]ii[i CONCEPTULUI vrem,oîn]elepciuneheraclitic`nepotvindeca surorilenoastreaufostceicareauie[itînstrad` TIMI{OARA deteroareasfîr[itului:undeclinpoatefiunnou [iauorganizatac]iunideprotestîncl`dirile OPENARTCITY universit`]ilor.Noiamvenitdup`. început.Iaracestaseafl`dejaînmijloculnostru, (TIMI{OARA-ORA{ înc`impur,hibrid,c`utîndu-sepesine. 32 DESCHISALARTELOR) cyanmagentayellowblack
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog Engleza
    Contemporary Romanian Writers MINISTRY OF CULTURE A Mature Literature A few years ago, in Romanian literature there was a clear split – in terms of themes, imagery, and devices – between writing that was firmly grounded in the critical canons, on the one hand, and texts by young writers more in tune with new trends and more receptive to outside influences, on the other. Those who had only recently entered the literary arena had the air of being a group, and this came not only from their shared imagery, disinhibition and rebelliousness, but also from their redefinition of literature and the literary. In time this split has become blurred. Whether young or old, whether esteemed by traditional-minded literary critics or beloved by the online media and literary blogs that nowadays set the publishing trends, active writers, i.e. those who publish a book at least every two to three years, have become more professional. Today's osmosis, the crystallisation of a unitary literature, is undoubtedly a sign of maturity, of the fact that the post-1989 literary transition has been left behind, and (why not?) of intellectual generosity on the part of those literary generations that have already become established. The memoir-dialogue between Paul Cornea and Daniel Cristea-Enache excerpted in this catalogue is a clear illustration of this idea. Therefore, it is pointless to discuss the literature being written in Romania today in terms of different generations. However, the genres currently being tackled might paint a livelier, more dynamic portrait of Romanian letters. The novel, still regarded as the dominant genre and the one with the greatest public impact, wagers on authenticity, parody and irony, and the results could not be more diverse.
    [Show full text]
  • Scrisoare Deschisă Preşedintelui României, Traian BĂSESCU*
    *Scrisoare deschisă Preşedintelui României, Traian BĂSESCU* 10 decembrie 2008 Domnule Preşedinte, În urmă cu exact patru ani România beneficia de cel mai important moment pentru memoria şi conştiinţa sa colectivă de la evenimentele din 1989 încoace. Atunci, o alianţă în care puţini crezuseră că poate câştiga alegerile parlamentare, reuşea să redea românilor sentimentul libertăţii şi al demnităţii. Timp de patru ani, 2000 - 2004, în care cuvintele cele mai rostite fuseseră „corupţie" „frică", „şantaj", „izolare", românii s-au simţit înşelaţi şi persecutaţi. Intelectualii incomozi erau ridicaţi de pe stradă, justiţia era înfăptuită în sufrageriile baronilor roşii, membrii cabinetului făceau deliciul presei internaţionale prin delapidările de fonduri europene iar programul de la televizor era făcut îndeaproape după agenda lui Adrian Năstase. Domnule Preşedinte, Onoarea unei naţiuni stă şi în liderii pe care îi are. Atât în dezbatreile publice cât şi în discuţii particulare, mulţi dintre noi, cei care semnează acest apel, v-au arătat sprijinul. Condamnarea comunismului din decembrie 2006 a fost o confirmare reală a faptului că aşteptările noastre n-au fost înşelate. Milioanele de victime ale totalitarismului şi ale unei ideologii barbare au fost răzbunate într-unul din cele mai solide documente din istoria Europei cu privire la trecutul recent. Prima ţară de pe glob care a condamnat comunismul nu are voie să se mai abată de la principiile libertăţii, stabilităţii şi prosperităţii! Domnule Preşedinte, *Vă solicităm în mod expres să nu giraţi
    [Show full text]
  • Memoria 54.QXD
    Editatã de FUNDAÞIA CULTURALÃ MEMORIA sub egida Uniunii Scriitorilor din România Fondator BANU RÃDULESCU Calea Victoriei 133 – 010071 – Bucureºti – România Tel./ Fax: (40) 21/212.97.72 http://www.revista.memoria.ro; E-mail: [email protected] Constantin Zgâmbãu Sergiu Grossu nãscut la 9 mai 1956 n Vântul cel potrivnic, p. 4-5 Hunedoara In memoriam Absolvent al Casei de Copii Alexandru Paleologu, p. 6-7 Baia de Criº; 19 Procesul comunismului Vasile Boroneanþ, p. 8-13 Florin Alex. Stãnescu Sã nu uitãm!... ºi dacã cineva spune cã nu ºtie... sã afle!, p. 15-22 Zicu Ionescu Lagãrele de exterminare, p. 23-31 Dorin Dobrincu Rezistenþa armatã anticomunistã din Bucovina, p. 33-48 Nicolae Vlad Garda Tineretului Român, p. 50-72 Cosmin Budeancã Procesul Organizaþiei „T“ din 1945, p. 74-90 Graþian Cormos Imaginea opresorului în memorialistica femininã de detenþie, p. 92-98 Cazurile Plãcinþeanu, p. 99-118 Adrian Hamzea Moartea pe îndelete, p. 119-122 Victoria Rãileanu Amintiri captive, uitãri fondatoare, p. 123-134 Lucien Romier Basarabia, mon amour, p. 136-144 Gheorghe Lãcãtuºu Generalul Victor Siminel, p. 145-148 Maria Marian Satul moare, p. 149-154 Mãsuri absurde, p. 155-157 GEOGRAFIA DETENÞIEI, p. 158-159 Mircea Enãchescu Amintiri din viaþa mea, p. 160-169 Eugenia Greceanu In memoriam Tatiana Pogonat, p. 171-175 Mihai Gãdãlean „Sã nu laºi pe nimeni sã gândeascã în locul tãu“, p. 176-179 Ariel Remos Memorial în amintirea sutelor de mii de victime ale tiranului Fidel Castro, p. 180-181 Claudia Dobre Memorie ºi istorie, p. 182-185 Mircea Popescu „Portretul robot“ al securistului, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commandant's Introduction
    The Commandants Introduction By Michael H. Clemmesen his issue of the Baltic Defence Re- It seems now to have been generally members seem to have realised this fact. view marks a change in the editorial recognized that the Alliance has to be To succeed, the transformation must line that is symbolised by the changed reformed thoroughly to remain relevant take the alliance forward and change it cover. The adjustment is not only caused to the leading member state. The U.S.A., from being a reactive self-defensive alli- by the fact that the three Baltic states have involved as she is in the drawn-out War ance. The outlined new NATO is a po- succeeded in being invited to NATO as Against Terror that was forced upon her litically much more demanding, divisive, well as to the EU and now have to adapt by the 11 September 2001 attacks, is not and risky framework for military co-op- to the new situation. It is also based on impressed by the contribution from most eration. Its missions will include opera- the realisation that the two organisations of the European allies. Only a small tions of coercion like the one against will change their character when the inte- progress has been made in the Yugoslavia with regard to Kosovo as well gration of the new members takes place. enhancement of the force structures of as pre-emptive Out-of-NATO area crisis The implementation of the new editorial the European members since the 1999 response operations military activism line will only come gradually.
    [Show full text]
  • „Nu M-Am G`Ndit S\ R\M`N `N America, Pentru C\ Am Cap Românesc“
    ACTUALITATE: Familia Minovici, descoperit\ prin „metoda Majuru“, pag. 2 LECTURI ~NTRERUPTE: „«P\catele tinere]ilor» lui Nicolae Manolescu“ de Doris Mironescu, pag. 7 CRONIC| DE FILM: „Familia Zorro, arivistul [i alte animale“ de Iulia Blaga, pag. 14 Citi]i-ne online la 1.50 lei www.polirom.ro/supliment.html Nr. 70 • 1-77 aprilie 2006 • S|PT|M~NAL REALIZAT DE EDITURA POLIROM {I „ZIARUL DE IA{I“ • APARE S~MB|TA • E-MMAIL: [email protected] Primele filme ale lui Alexandru Solomon, la ICR De ce are South Park „C`inele cu ochi de om un locuitor `n minus `nfrunt\ zilnic omul cu Ultima „isprav\“ a produc\torilor Trey Parker [i Matt Stone a f\cut `nconjurul lumii, aduc`nd z`mbete ochi de c`ine“ chiar [i pe fe]ele celor care nu erau fani South Park. PAGINA 2 „Coolturisme“ de M\d\lina Cocea `n PAGINA 4 Artistul vizual Matei Bejenaru: „Nu m-am g`ndit s\ r\m`n `n America, pentru c\ am cap românesc“ {coala ne inoculeaz\ ideea c\ artistul trebuie s\ fie un ne`n]eles, un retras, even- tual u[or suferind de paranoia, c\ se r\zboie[te cu prezentul [i doar viitorul `i va recunoa[te urmele pe care le las\ prin cetate. Matei Bejenaru contrazice, prin tot ceea ce `ntreprinde, canonul de mai sus. A f\cut, `n ultima decad\, un festival de art\ contemporan\ [i unul de film, a `nceput reabilitarea unui cartier istoric al ora[ului. Matei Bejenaru este un tip ocupat. At`t de ocupat, `nc`t a uitat s\ fug\ `n str\in\tate, al\turi de colegii lui de genera]ie.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence in the Subcultures of Contemporary Romanian Youth
    LINGUACULTURE, 2, 2011 DOI: 10.2478/v10318-012-0014-6 DESCRIPTIONS OF THE BODY: VIOLENCE IN THE SUBCULTURES OF CONTEMPORARY ROMANIAN YOUTH DANIELA DOBOș Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi Abstract: For a long time, with few exceptions, Romanian linguistics took no interest in native slang, but after 1990 this has made a dramatic comeback in more than one way. One of the crudest versions of new slang, with touches of violence and licentiousness, turning the unsayable into sayable, is that currently used by young Romanians. It has been justly argued that such linguistic outlet came as a logical consequence, after the demise of communism, of the former censorship and wooden tongue. The paper sets out to put this oft-deplored linguistic phenomenon into perspective and analyse the main linguistic means employed in shaping it up. Keywords: slang; subculture; violence; licentiousness. While in the case of English and other European languages such as Spanish or German research on youth language has been growing steadily ever since William Labov’s epoch-making 1972 study of Black English Vernacular in New York City, in the case of Romanian such research, with few exceptions, is all but absent, despite the fact that youth speech is becoming ever more ‘visible’, thanks to the media and to what Rodica Zafiu (2010) has termed “the democratization of writing: anyone may now write and be read in the public space”. Generally speaking, interest in youth language may be related to the fact that, as Eckert (52) has noted, “adolescents are the linguistic movers and shakers […] and as such a prime source of information about linguistic change”; other researchers too argue that it is in the language of the young that linguistic innovations first appear (Stenström et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Steaua Nr. 1 Din 2019
    revistă culturală editată de Uniunea Scriitorilor din România finanțată cu sprijinul Ministerului Culturii și Identității Naționale Anul LXX * nr. 1 (843) * ianuarie 2019 EDITORIAL Adrian Popescu DUPĂ 70 DE ANI... 3 Maria Chiorean ILUZIA ROMÂNISMULUI, RECALIBRATĂ 5 GRUPAJ Petru Poantă „REVISTELE AVEAU POLITICA LOR” 7 Steaua 70 Valentin Tașcu STEAUA (fragment) 7 Aurel Rău DINTR-UN JURNAL ANECDOTIC UTOPIC – TREI SECVENȚE 12 Doru Burlacu ALMANAHUL LITERAR (fragment) 12 b „CLUJUL LITERAR AL ANILOR ’60”(interviu cu Vasile Fanache) 15 Mircea Cărtărescu: Ioana Bican LAUDATIO 17 Doctor Honoris Causa Mircea Cărtărescu CÂTEVA GÂNDURI LA DECERNAREA TITLULUI al UBB DE DOCTOR HONORIS CAUSA 21 Emil Brumaru 1938-2019 Adrian Popescu UN ONIRIC DELICAT 24 Ruxandra Cesereanu HOBBITUL ȘI ÎNGERII 24 Emil Brumaru [POEME] (o selecție a redacției) 25 GRUPAJ participă Gabriela Adameșteanu, Doina Jela, Stelian Țurlea, Andra Rotaru, Autorii și cărțile Radu Andriescu, Carmen Firan, Traian Ștef, Liviu Antonesei, Laura T. Ilea, lor din 2018 Robert Șerban, Liliana Corobca, Caius Dobrescu, Andreea Răsuceanu, Radu Vancu, Ionel Ciupureanu, Cosmin Perța, Ioana Pârvulescu, Ovidiu Pecican 26 Autoportret în oglinda convexă (33): Ellen Bass (traducere și prezentare de Alex Văsieș) 31 Aurelia Luca [POEME] 33 CRONICA LITERARĂ Ion Pop UN OM CARE SCRIE 34 Marius Conkan RECVIEM PENTRU URMUZ 36 Victor Cubleșan BRODERII DE STICLĂ 37 Ovidiu Pecican ÎNTRE ISTORIE ȘI MIT 39 Ruxandra Cesereanu 1 DECEMBRIE ȘI 21 DECEMBRIE 2018 41 Laura T. Ilea CU TINE MOARE LUMEA TA 43 Liviu Cangeopol
    [Show full text]
  • Narrating the Communist Prison: an Interpretive Model of Some Romanian Case Studies
    Narrating the Communist Prison: An Interpretive Model of Some Romanian Case Studies Oana Fotache Contents I. Introduction. Critical response to the prison literature in post-communist Romania. II. Brief theoretical remarks. How can one write a prison memoir. III. Case studies. A thematic analysis. IV. Conclusions. Generic status of the prison literature. An ethical and historiographical perspective. Abstract After the fall of the communist regime in Romania (1989) an impressive number of books, diaries, memoirs that recorded the prison experience of the ‘50s and early ‘60s were published. These books were authored by very different individuals, representing almost all the social classes of the time, with a diverse educational background, or intellectual level, not to mention the quality of their writing. Several studies on this literature were published (Ruxandra Cesereanu, Gulagul în conștiința românească. Memorialistica și literatura închisorilor și lagărelor comuniste. Eseu de mentalitate/ The Gulag in the Romanian Conscience. Communist Prison Memoirs and Literature. An Essay of Collective Mentality, 2005; Mihai Rădulescu, Istoria literaturii române de detenție. Mărturisirea colaborării/ History of the Romanian Political Detention Literature. The Confessing of Collaboration, 1998; Ion Bălan, Regimul concentraționar din România. 1945-1964/ The Concentrationary Regime in Romania. 1945- 1964, 2000, to mention only the most significant). Their purpose was generally informative and evocative. Though many typologies and groupings were suggested, a poetics of the genre was not yet elaborated. The present paper attempts at proposing an interpretive model of the ‘prison literature’ genre that situates it at the crossroads of history and autobiographical literature. It also tries to adapt Michel Foucault’s analysis of the prison (in Surveiller et punir, 1975/ Discipline and Punish, 1977) to the context of the communist epoch and to study the narrative devices employed by the writers in order to ‘tame’ this unthinkable – yet also very real – life experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Communist Romania
    Political Science • Eastern Europe Carey Edited by Henry F. Carey Foreword by Norman Manea “Henry Carey’s collection captures with great precision the complex, contradic- tory reality of contemporary Romania. Bringing together Romanian, West European, and American authors from fields as diverse as anthropology, politi- Romania cal science, economics, law, print and broadcast journalism, social work, and lit- ROMANIA SINCE 1989 erature, the volume covers vast ground, but with striking detail and scholarship and a common core approach. Romania since 1989 provides perhaps the most comprehensive view of the continuing, murky, contested reality that is Romania today and is a must read for any scholar of modern Romania, of East-Central Europe, and of the uncertain, troubled, post-socialist era.” since 1989 —David A. Kideckel, Central Connecticut State University Sorin Antohi “The wealth of detail and quality of insights will make this an excellent source- Wally Bacon book for students of political change after the Cold War. It should be taken seri- Gabriel Ba˘ descu ously by policy practitioners increasingly involved with Romania’s problems.” Zoltan Barany —Tom Gallagher, Professor of Peace Studies, Bradford University, U.K. Politics, Jóhanna Kristín Birnir Larry S. Bush Those who study Romania must confront the theoretical challenges posed by a Economics, Pavel Câmpeanu country that is undergoing a profound transformation from a repressive totali- Henry F. Carey tarian regime to a hazy and as yet unrealized democratic government. The most and Society Daniel Da˘ ianu comprehensive survey of Romanian politics and society ever published abroad, Dennis Deletant this volume represents an effort to collect and analyze data on the complex prob- Christopher Eisterhold lems of Romania’s past and its transition into an uncertain future.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Memory and National Identity in Post-Communist Romania: Representations of the Communist Past in Romanian News Media and Romanian Politics (1990 - 2009)
    COLLECTIVE MEMORY AND NATIONAL IDENTITY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA: REPRESENTATIONS OF THE COMMUNIST PAST IN ROMANIAN NEWS MEDIA AND ROMANIAN POLITICS (1990 - 2009) A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Constanta Alina Hogea May 2014 Examining Committee Members: Carolyn Kitch, Advisory Chair, Journalism Nancy Morris, Media Studies and Production Fabienne Darling-Wolf, Journalism Mihai Coman, External Member, University of Bucharest © Copyright 2014 by Constanta Alina Hogea All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT My dissertation situates at the intersection of communication studies and political sciences under the umbrella of the interdisciplinary field of collective memory. Precisely, it focuses on the use of the communist past by political actors to gain power and legitimacy, and on the interplay between news media and politics in shaping a national identity in post-communist Romania. My research includes the analysis of the media representations of two categories of events: the anniversaries of the Romanian Revolution and the political campaigns for presidential/parliamentary elections. On the one hand, the public understanding of the break with communism plays an important role in how the post-communist society is defined. The revolution as a schism between the communist regime and a newborn society acts like a prism through which Romanians understand their communist past, but also the developments the country has taken after it. On the other hand, political communication is operating on the public imaginary of the past, the present and the future. The analysis of the political discourses unfolded in the news media shows how the collective memory of the communist past is used to serve political interests in the discursive struggle for power and legitimacy.
    [Show full text]