DOCSLIB.ORG

Form C Basic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Form C Basic 1 School of Archaeology & Ancient History AR2032 Foragers to Farmers Academic Year: 2009-2010 Semester: 1 Time and location: Monday 13.00-14.00 BEN LT10 Tuesday 15.00-16.00 PHY LTD Hands-on sessions: Ceramics Lab Seminars 1-3 Library Seminar Room First meeting: 5th October 2009 Module coordinator: Huw Barton e-mail: [email protected] Room: 104 Office hours: To be posted (see office door) Your individual appointments (e.g. tutorials, seminars): …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… document prepared by: Huw Barton, 21st September 2007 2 Foragers to Farmers AR2032 Weighting: 20 credits Coordinator: Huw Barton Other tutors: Lynden Cooper, Nick Cooper, Terry Hopkinson. Module This module addresses key issues in the study of prehistory, including the outline: Palaeolithic, and the transition from foraging to farming. The course explores the themes of settlement and mobility providing a global coverage, and outlining the key debates in each region. The course covers a long period of archaeological time during which ways of life changed radically, but it unifies the study of prehistory through an emphasis on the ways that people solved the problems of resource acquisition, and consideration of adaptation to different climates and environments. Issues covered will include the evolution of hominids and human cognition, concepts of hunter-gatherer mobility, the impact of sedentism and with it the development of different systems of agriculture. In addition, the course will introduce students to the critical evaluation of the archaeological evidence for evaluating different life-ways in prehistory, and of the approaches and methods archaeologists have used to do this. Aims: To build on the chronological/thematic awareness gained in AR1004, by providing students with a developed understanding of the character and development of prehistoric societies. To introduce students to the key issues and theoretical debates informing the archaeological analysis of social, economic and technological change in human prehistory over time as foragers and/or farmers. To examine the range of archaeological sources for prehistoric studies and critically consider their strengths/weaknesses. To enable students to develop independent learning skills. Intended Demonstrate a broad knowledge of the archaeology and cultural learning development of the period (field trip and exam). outcomes: Demonstrate an improved understanding of the interpretative models for the period (field trip, seminar contributions, essay, exam). Show an understanding of the interplay between archaeological evidence, method and theory (essay, exam). Critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the archaeological sources for the period (essay, exam). Method(s) of Two lectures per week; small-group teaching with three large group teaching: Seminars; two ‘hands-on’ sessions to familiarise students with the material culture of the period; a one-day field trip to Cresswell Craggs to visit some Pleistocene sites of the East Midlands. Method of One essay of 2500 words (50%) November 2009 assessment: One two-hour examination (50%) June-July 2010 3 Teaching schedule Teaching wk Week 2 Mon 5 Oct Course Introduction/Landscape mosaics (HB/TH). Tues 6 Oct Oldowan: technology and space (TH). Week 3 Mon 12 Oct Acheulean and the handaxe (TH). Tues 13 Oct Middle Palaeolithic subsistence and mobility (TH). Week 4 Mon 19 Oct Lower-middle Palaeolithic transition: technology and settlement (TH). Tues 20 Oct The emergence of Homo sapiens and modernity (TH). Week 5 Mon 26 Oct Seminar 1 (HB/TH) Tues 27 Oct Big game hunting in North America (HB). Week 6 Mon 2 Nov Laboratory Class: Ceramics. (NC/HB) Tues 3 Nov Defining and identifying mobility in the archaeological record (HB). Week 7 9-13 Nov [Reading week] Week 8 Mon 16 Nov Seminar 2 (HB/TH) Tues 17 Nov Ethno-archaeology (HB). Week 9 Mon 23 Nov The origins of agriculture (HB). Tues 24 Nov The spread of agriculture into Europe (MVL). Week 10 Mon 30 Dec Seminar 3 (HB/TH) Tues 1 Dec Laboratory Class: Lithics. (LC/HB) Week 11 Mon 7 Dec The roots of tropical agriculture (HB). Tues 8 Dec Revision Lecture (TH). 4 Seminars Seminar 1 (TH & HB) Why do Stone Tools Vary? A: Binford, L.R. 1973. Interassemblage variability: the Mousterian and the ‚functional‛ argument. In C. Renfrew (Ed) The Explanation of Culture Change pp227-254. London, Duckworth. (Function, Middle Palaeolithic) B: Bordes, F. & de Sonneville-Bordes, D. 1970. The significance of variability in Paleolithic assemblages. World Archaeology 2: 61-73. (Culture, whole Palaeolithic) C: Rolland, N.C. and Dibble, H.L. 1990. A new synthesis of Middle Paleolithic variability. American Antiquity 55: 480-499. (Raw material economy, Middle Palaeolithic) In this tutorial you will consider some ways in which archaeologists have understood stone artefact variability. The reading refers mainly to the Middle Palaeolithic but the arguments put forward can be applied equally to such variability in any other period of the Palaeolithic and even to later periods including the present. Seminar 2 (TH & HB) Megafaunal Extinctions: were humans to blame? Readings to be posted on Blackboard. Seminar 3 (TH & HB) Was agriculture inevitable? Readings to be posted on Blackboard. Creswell Craggs field trip (hotlink to the Creswell website). There will be a one day field trip to Creswell Craggs and the surrounding landscape to directly engage with the Pleistocene archaeology of the East Midlands. Saturday 7th November 2009. Depart University at 9am. 5 Assignments and deadlines All students on this course must submit one essay of up to 2500 words, which counts for 40% of the overall mark for the module. Essays should be word- processed. The essay deadline is 4.30pm on Monday 23rd November 2009. The remainder of the course will be assessed by exam worth 60% in June-July. *You must use Tunitin* You are also required to submit an electronic copy of your essay via the Turnitin facility of the (insert Module code and/or title here) Blackboard site – please make sure that you have read the Turnitin – Personal Data and Intellectual Property section of your Undergraduate Handbook. The electronic copy is to be submitted by the same deadline as the paper copy. Please note that this electronic submission is COMPULSORY. Late submission of either copy will result in the appropriate lateness penalties being applied to the final mark. Students failing to submit both paper and electronic copies by the designated deadline will be deemed to have FAILED the assessment (i.e. a mark of zero will be recorded) Essay titles 1. Oldowan archaeological sites have been interpreted as evidence for hunting and food sharing in the period before 1.5 mya. What are the problems with this viewpoint and what alternatives have been proposed? General Overviews Klein, R.G. 1999. The Human Career (2nd Edition) Chapter 4, ‘The Australopithecines and Homo habilis’. London, University of Chicago Press. Schick, K. and Toth, N. 1993. Making Silent Stones Speak, chapter 6, ‘The Nature and Significance ofEarly Stone Age Sites’. London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson. Toth, N. and Schick, K. 2005. African Origins, especially pp74-83. In Scarre, C. (ed) The Human Past. London, Thames and Hudson. Key Readings Binford, L.R. 1981. Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. New York, Academic Press. Bunn, H.T. and Kroll, E.M. 1986. Systematic butchery by Plio/Pleistocene hominids at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Current Anthropology 27, 431-452. Isaac, G.Ll. 1978. Food Sharing and Human Evolution: Archaeological Evidence from the Plio-Pleistocene of East Africa. Journal of Anthropological Research 34, 311-325. Potts, R.B. 1991. Why the Oldowan? Plio-Pleistocene toolmaking and the transport of resources. Journal of Anthropological Research 47, 153-176. Stern, N. 1993. The Structure of the Lower Pleistocene Archaeological Record: a Case Study from the Koobi Fora Formation. Current Anthropology 34, 201-22. 6 Further Reading Blumenschine, R.J. 1995. Percussion marks, tooth marks and experimental determinations of the timing of hominid and carnivore access to long bones at FLK Zinjanthropus, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Journal of Human Evolution 29, 21-51. *Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. and Pickering, T.R. 2003. Early Hominid Hunting and Scavenging: a Zooarcheological Review. Evolutionary Anthropology 12, 275-82. O’Connell, F. 1997. On Plio-Pleistocene Archaeological Sites and Central Places. Current Anthropology 38, 86-88. Rose, L. and Marshall, F. 1996. Meat Eating, Hominid Sociality, and Home Bases Revisited. Current Anthropology 37, 307-338. Selvaggio, M.M. 1998. The Archaeological Implications of Water-Cached Hyena Kills. Current Anthropology 39, 381-385. 2. Why do some European Lower Palaeolithic stone tool assemblages lack handaxes? Ashton, N.M. et al 1994. Contemporaneity of Clactonian and Acheulian flint industries at Barnham, Suffolk. Antiquity 68, 585-9. Bordes, F. & de Sonneville-Bordes, D. 1970. The significance of variability in Paleolithic assemblages. World Archaeology 2: 61-73. Davidson, I. and Noble, W. 1993. Tools and language in human evolution. In K. R. Gibson and T. Ingold (Eds) Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp63-88. Dibble, H.L. 1989. The Implications of Stone Tool Types for the Presence of Language during the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic. In P. Mellars and C. Stringer (Eds) The Human Revolution. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, pp415-32. Gamble, C.S. 1998. Handaxes and Palaeolithic Individuals. In N.M. Ashton, F. Healy and P. B. Pettitt (Eds) Stone Age Archaeology: Essays in Honour of John Wymer. Oxford, Lithic Studies Society Occasional Paper No. 6. Oxbow Monograph 102, pp105-109. Klein, R. 1999. The Human Career Chapter 5 ‘The Evolution of the Genus Homo’, especially pages 328-41. Chicago, Chicago University Press. McNabb, J. 1996. More from the cutting edge: further discoveries of Clactonian bifaces. Antiquity 70, 428-36. Mithen, S. 1994: Technology and society during the Middle Pleistocene: hominid group size, social learning and industrial variability. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 4, 3-32. Ohel, M.Y.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A CRITICAL EVALUATION of the LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD of the CHALK UPLANDS of NORTHWEST EUROPE Lesley
    A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD OF THE CHALK UPLANDS OF NORTHWEST EUROPE The Chilterns, Pegsdon, Bedfordshire (photograph L. Blundell) Lesley Blundell UCL Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD September 2019 2 I, Lesley Blundell, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed: 3 4 Abstract Our understanding of early human behaviour has always been and continues to be predicated on an archaeological record unevenly distributed in space and time. More than 80% of British Lower-Middle Palaeolithic findspots were discovered during the late 19th/early 20th centuries, the majority from lowland fluvial contexts. Within the British planning process and some academic research, the resultant findspot distributions are taken at face value, with insufficient consideration of possible bias resulting from variables operating on their creation. This leads to areas of landscape outside the river valleys being considered to have only limited archaeological potential. This thesis was conceived as an attempt to analyse the findspot data of the Lower-Middle Palaeolithic record of the Chalk uplands of southeast Britain and northern France within a framework complex enough to allow bias in the formation of findspot distribution patterns and artefact preservation/discovery opportunities to be identified and scrutinised more closely. Taking a dynamic, landscape = record approach, this research explores the potential influence of geomorphology, 19th/early 20th century industrialisation and antiquarian collecting on the creation of the Lower- Middle Palaeolithic record through the opportunities created for artefact preservation and release.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East: a Guide John J
    Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East: A Guide John J. Shea New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 408 pp. (hardback), $104.99. ISBN-13: 978-1-107-00698-0. Reviewed by DEBORAH I. OLSZEWSKI Department of Anthropology, Penn Museum, 3260 South Street, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; [email protected] n reading the Preface and Introduction to Shea’s book Stone Age Prehistory,” and lists the origins of genus Homo Iwhere he discusses why he wrote this volume on Near in the Lower Paleolithic period, which is incorrect both Eastern stone tools, I had to smile because his experience as temporally and geographically (Homo ergaster appearing ca a graduate student was analogous to mine. Learning about 1.8 Mya in Africa, or Homo habilis ca 2.5 Mya in Africa, if one stone tools in this world region was not easy because no accepts this hominin as sufficiently derived as to belong to single typology had been developed, at least in the sense genus Homo). And the same is true in this table for several of a widely accepted set of terminology that could be ap- other major evolutionary events for which our earliest evi- plied to the Paleolithic and Epipaleolithic there, or even the dence is African rather than Levantine. Neolithic period. In retrospect, it is somewhat surprising For Chapter 2 (Lithics Basics), the reader is immedi- that in the several decades since no one, until this book by ately immersed in how stone fractures (using terminol- Shea, undertook producing a compendium of information ogy from mechanics), is abraded, and is knapped.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Biface Assemblages in Middle Pleistocene Western Europe. A
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF LAW, ART and SOCIAL SCIENCES SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES Non-Biface Assemblages in Middle Pleistocene Western Europe. A comparative study. by Hannah Louise Fluck Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2011 1 2 Abstract This thesis presents the results of an investigation into the Clactonian assemblages of Middle Pleistocene souther Britain. By exploring other non-biface assemblages (NBAs) reported from elsewhere in Europe it seeks to illuminate our understanding of the British assemblages by viewing them in a wider context. It sets out how the historical and geopolitical context of Palaeolithic research has influenced what is investigated and how, as well as interpretations of assemblages without handaxes. A comparative study of the assemblages themselves based upon primary data gathered specifically for that purpose concludes that while there are a number of non-biface assemblages elsewhere in Europe the Clactonian assemblages do appear to be a phenomenon unique to the Thames Valley in early MIS 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Age Essex a Teacher's Guide
    Stone Age Essex A Teacher’s Guide Colchester and Ipswich Museums 1 Table of contents Overview of Stone Age Essex 3 Stone Age Timeline 7 Stone Age Glossary 8 Recommended Resources 9 Recommended Additional Learning 10 Stone Age Objects 11 Activity Examples 15 2 Overview of Stone Age Essex The Stone Age had three distinct periods: the Palaeolithic (Old Stone Age), the Mesolithic (Middle Stone Age) and the Neolithic (New Stone Age). The people from each of these periods had different levels of technology and methods of survival. Palaeolithic The Palaeolithic began in Britain around 800,000 years ago when early humans, including Homo antecessor and Homo neanderthalensis, crossed the land bridge that connected Britain to mainland Europe. The cold temperatures of the last Ice Age had left most of Britain covered in ice and snow, rendering it uninhabitable. Interglacial periods, when the ice sheet retreated and the temperature warmed, allowed early humans to cross the land bridge and take advantage of the rich flora and fauna in Britain. Palaeolithic people who crossed the land bridge into Britain were hunter-gatherers. They developed tools made of stone to exploit the environment around them. Evidence of butchery on animal bones shows that they used these tools to hunt species including mammoth, red deer, hare and antelope. PALEOLITHIC SITES (Essex and Suffolk) Marks Tey Why is Marks Tey important? In the last Ice Age, most of Britain was covered by an ice sheet. The area that is now Marks Tey lay at the easternmost edge of the ice sheet. This was the edge of the habitable world for both humans and animals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Art, Abstract Thincking and Social Relations in the Human Evolution
    Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. Studii şi comunicări. Ştiinţele Naturii. Tom. 32, No. 2/2016 ISSN 1454-6914 THE ROLE OF ART, ABSTRACT THINCKING AND SOCIAL RELATIONS IN THE HUMAN EVOLUTION CORNEANU Mihaela, CORNEANU C. Gabriel Abstract. Before the appearance of Homo sapiens sapiens, some pre-human genotypes that lived on the Earth, left material evidence concerning different events of their social, behavioural or artistic manifestations. One of the earliest proofs is the use of objects from the environment as primitive tools to extract bone marrow, action probably achieved by a population of Australanthropus olteniensis in Romania (Tetoiu, Bugiuleşti, Oltenia, about 2,000,000 BC). Current studies show that pre-human species originated in the African Rift Valley, which provided optimum benefits to its evolution and diversity. Proto-oceanic environmental quality and diet (rich source of polyunsaturated long fibres) ensured brain development and human evolution. Several pre-human species (Homo habilis, H. naledi, H. erectus, etc.) emerged and lived in this area prior to their migration to other continents. Fire making and use, both for cooking and protection against weather and wildlife, was the essential factor for human evolution. Benefiting from the cooked food, pre-human beings had access to richer food resources, which led to the increase of the skeleton, and, implicitly, of the skull and encephalus. This made possible the development of practical utilities, followed by abstract utilities, such as thinking and intelligence. Sexual dimorphism, the presence of the gene FOX-P2 and the development of language, social and tribal life led to the arrangement of the living spaces, family.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Histories, Metapopulation Ecology, and Innovation in the Acheulian
    Life Histories, Metapopulation Ecology, and Innovation in the Acheulian TERRY HOPKINSON School of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UNITED KINGDOM; [email protected] APRIL NOWELL Department of Anthropology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3P5, CANADA; [email protected] MARK WHITE Department of Archaeology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UNITED KINGDOM; [email protected] ABSTRACT In the course of the evolution of the genus Homo, the most profound developments in life history parameters seem to have occurred in the Lower Pleistocene. Yet Acheulian industries are widely seen as having remained essential- ly unchanged for some 1.3 million years or more. In reality, however, although the Acheulian did not develop in a cumulative or directional manner over its long history, it nevertheless displayed considerable levels of typological and technological diversity and variability at continental, regional, and local levels. It is at the local level that this variability is at its greatest, with prepared core technologies regarded as characteristic of the succeeding Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age appearing sporadically and ephemerally in the Acheulian. It is our contention that this pattern of local, short term variability combined with global long term stasis cannot be accounted for by models asserting that the hominin makers of the Acheulian lacked the cognitive capabilities of their evolutionary successors. Instead, we argue that Acheulian hominins were cognitively capable of innovative technical behavior and often displayed it; but that, despite structural life history parameters that approached those of living Homo sapiens, relatively short childhood, juvenile, and adolescence phases, combined with small local group size, con- strained the social and developmental scope for innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old World Paleolithic and the Development of a National Collection
    /i £\ The Old World Paleolithic and the Development of a National Collection MICHAEL PETRAGLIA and RICHARD POTTS ILLUSTRATIONS BY MARCIA BAKRY SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANTHROPOLOGY • NUMBER 48 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement; "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Lithic Production Systems to the Interpretation Of
    The contribution of lithic production systems to the interpretation of Mousterian industrial variability in south-western France: The example of Combe-Grenal (Dordogne, France) Jean-Philippe Faivre, Emmanuel Discamps, Brad Gravina, Alain Turq, Jean-Luc Guadelli, Michel Lenoir To cite this version: Jean-Philippe Faivre, Emmanuel Discamps, Brad Gravina, Alain Turq, Jean-Luc Guadelli, et al.. The contribution of lithic production systems to the interpretation of Mousterian industrial variability in south-western France: The example of Combe-Grenal (Dordogne, France). Quaternary International, Elsevier, 2014, 350, pp.227-240. 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.05.048. hal-01139414 HAL Id: hal-01139414 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01139414 Submitted on 23 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The contribution of lithic production systems to the interpretation of Mousterian industrial variability in south-western France: The example of Combe-Grenal (Dordogne, France) Jean-Philippe Faivre, Emmanuel Discamps, Brad Gravina, Alain Turq, Jean-Luc Guadelli, Michel Lenoir a b s t r a c t Keywords: Mousterian variability Disentangling the relative contribution of the various factors underlying Middle Palaeolithic industrial Combe-Grenal Primary flaking strategies variability remains one of the foremost problems for researchers interested in Neandertal technological Raw material provisioning strategies and behavioural adaptations.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Lower Palaeolithic – Stones in Contention John Mcnabb Florence, KY: Routledge, 2007, 448 Pp
    The British Lower Palaeolithic – Stones in Contention John McNabb Florence, KY: Routledge, 2007, 448 pp. (paperback), $49.95. ISBN-13: 9780415427289. Reviewed by MARIE SORESSI INRAP, 525, avenue de la Pomme de Pin, F-45590 Saint-Cyr-en-Val, FRANCE; and, AnTET, ArScAn, UMR 7041, 21, allée de l’Université, F-92023 Nanterre Cedex, FRANCE; and, MPI-EVA, Department of Human Evolution, Deutscher Platz 6, D-04103 Leipzig, GERMANY; [email protected] his book is a very rich volume and is actually two or century. Interestingly, the author provides his own analy- Teven three books within a single book—one present- sis of the influence of the academic, social, and historical ing general background, data and interpretations about context on the interpretation of the Clactonian. He con- the Lower Paleolithic; one discussing the specific issue of cludes by stating that “the power of history to influence the the significance of the “Clactonian;” and, one illustrating supposedly more objective interpretations of the twenty- the evolution of scholarly ideas about the Clactonian in first century appears as strong as it ever was” (p. 303). their historical context over more than 100 years. Indeed, The last part of this book (Chapters 12 and 13) is an the book was written not to provide definitive statements essay on the “cultural” nature of the Clactonian and the about the Lower Paleolithic in Great Britain but rather to impossibility of demonstrating it; according to McNabb, help readers think about the issues and “make their own the cultural nature of contemporaneous handaxes indus- minds up, at least about what the most significant questions tries would be easier to demonstrate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mousterian: a Study of a Paleolithic Tool Industry
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects Sociology and Anthropology 1970 The Mousterian: A Study of a Paleolithic Tool Industry Loenoard A. Zalucha Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/socanth_honproj Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Zalucha, Loenoard A., "The Mousterian: A Study of a Paleolithic Tool Industry" (1970). Honors Projects. 34. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/socanth_honproj/34 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by Faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. THE MOUSTERIANz tR==A -:- ,4UDY -- .;:;;.;;.;;;;=..;;�:::;;.:;;.;;;;;:..:;. TOOL INDUSTRY SPECIAL COLLECTIONS Il.linois Der:'},:ct:;;ent of Socto2o{�y-AnthropolocY ho:nors .. Advtsor ,,�L---.." .. -.... TABLE CONTENTS .. " " " .. .. .. ",1 I .. II. Culture .. ..8 ..11 CUlture 15 .. ........ v .. VI .. .. .. .. " " .. A A Artifaots ........ 36 ....42 a man.. It a and styles of flintwork which this .. It will tool , ohipping teohniques, outside influences. It will to whioh Neanderthal man worked in flint forms are mirrored this other It will Mousterian hcw it was influenced earlier contemporary industries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palaeolithic Occupation of Europe As Revealed by Evidence from the Rivers: Data from IGCP 449
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by EPrints Complutense The Palaeolithic occupation of Europe as revealed by evidence from the rivers: data from IGCP 449 DAVID R. BRIDGLAND,h PIERRE ANTOINE/ NICOLE LlMONDIN-LOZOUET/ JUAN I. SANTISTEBAN/ ROB WESTAWAy4t and MARK J. WHITEs 1 Department of Geography, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK 2 UMR CNRS 8591-Laboratoire de Geographie Physique, 1 Place Aristide Briand, 92195 Meudon cedex, France 3 Departamento Estratigraffa, Facultad Ciencias Geol6gicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Calle Jose Antonio Novais 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain 4 Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, The Open University, Eldon House, Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne NE3 3PW, UK 5 Department of Archaeology, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK ABSTRACT: IGCP 449 (2000-2004), seeking to correlate fluvial records globally, has compiled a dataset of archaeological records from Pleistocene fluvial sequences. Many terrace sequences can now be reliably dated and correlated with marine oxygen isotope stages (M IS), allowing potentially useful patterns in artefact distribution to be recognised. This review, based on evidence from northwest European and German sequences (Thames, Somme, Ilm, Neckar and Wipper), makes wider comparisons with rivers further east, particularly the Vltava, and with southern Europe, especially Iberia. The northwest and southern areas have early assemblages dominated by handaxes, in contrast with flake-core industries in Germany and further east. Fluvial sequences can provide frameworks for correlation, based on markers within the Palaeolithic record. In northwest Europe the first appearance of artefacts in terrace staircases, the earliest such marker, dates from the mid-late Cromerian Complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Age Institute Publication Series Series Editors Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth
    stone age institute publication series Series Editors Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth Stone Age Institute Gosport, Indiana and Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana Number 1. THE OLDOWAN: Case Studies into the Earliest Stone Age Nicholas Toth and Kathy Schick, editors Number 2. BREATHING LIFE INTO FOSSILS: Taphonomic Studies in Honor of C.K. (Bob) Brain Travis Rayne Pickering, Kathy Schick, and Nicholas Toth, editors Number 3. THE CUTTING EDGE: New Approaches to the Archaeology of Human Origins Kathy Schick, and Nicholas Toth, editors Number 4. THE HUMAN BRAIN EVOLVING: Paleoneurological Studies in Honor of Ralph L. Holloway Douglas Broadfield, Michael Yuan, Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth, editors STONE AGE INSTITUTE PUBLICATION SERIES NUMBER 1 THE OLDOWAN: Case Studies Into the Earliest Stone Age Edited by Nicholas Toth and Kathy Schick Stone Age Institute Press · www.stoneageinstitute.org 1392 W. Dittemore Road · Gosport, IN 47433 COVER PHOTOS Front, clockwise from upper left: 1) Excavation at Ain Hanech, Algeria (courtesy of Mohamed Sahnouni). 2) Kanzi, a bonobo (‘pygmy chimpanzee’) fl akes a chopper-core by hard-hammer percussion (courtesy Great Ape Trust). 3) Experimental Oldowan fl aking (Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth). 4) Scanning electron micrograph of prehistoric cut-marks from a stone tool on a mammal limb shaft fragment (Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth). 5) Kinesiological data from Oldowan fl aking (courtesy of Jesus Dapena). 6) Positron emission tomography of brain activity during Oldowan fl aking (courtesy of Dietrich Stout). 7) Experimental processing of elephant carcass with Oldowan fl akes (the animal died of natural causes). (Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth). 8) Reconstructed cranium of Australopithecus garhi.
    [Show full text]