DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Identity and Ornamentation in the Ancestral Puebloan Southwest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Identity and Ornamentation in the Ancestral Puebloan Southwest Social Identity and Ornamentation in the Ancestral Puebloan Southwest: Basketmaker II to Pueblo IV by Zonna Barnes B.A., Fort Lewis College, 2003 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology 2010 This thesis entitled: Social Identity and Ornamentation in the Ancestral Puebloan Southwest: Basketmaker II to Pueblo IV written by Zonna Barnes has been approved for the Department of Anthropology (Catherine M. Cameron, committee chair) (Stephen H. Lekson) Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. Barnes, Zonna (MA, Anthropology) Social Identity and Ornamentation in the Ancestral Puebloan Southwest: Basketmaker II to Pueblo IV Thesis directed by Professor Catherine M. Cameron In the northern Southwest, items of personal adornment were an important component of ceremonial costuming and everyday dress that can provide a wealth of information about the past. People use items of adornment to communicate information about themselves in a non-verbal manner and as a result, these items of adornment are informative of social identity, including age, gender, occupation, social status, ethnicity, social group membership, or ceremonial affiliation. In this thesis, I explore the materialization of social identity as it is communicated or symbolized through personal adornment by examining archaeological evidence from 68 sites in the Ancestral Puebloan Southwest that date between 1200 B.C and 1400 A.D. Multiple lines of evidence are used (ornaments, mortuary data, ethnographic data, and representational media) to attempt to understand and interpret personal adornment practices in the past, and assess how ornaments intersect with these social aspects. The results of this study demonstrate differences in the styles and types of ornaments in relation to age, gender, status and group membership. iii Acknowledgements I would like to extend my gratitude to several people that were integral in the completion of this thesis. First, I would like to thank my advisor, Cathy Cameron for her constant support, patience, understanding and guidance. I would also like to thank my committee members, Steve Lekson and Tammy Stone for their comments and willingness to participate in this endeavor. The research conducted for this thesis at the American Museum of Natural History and the Peabody Museum of Anthropology and Ethnology was funded by grants from the Walker Van Riper grant awarded by the CU Museum of Natural History and the Alice Hamilton Scholarship Fund from the Colorado Historical Society. I would like to thank Susan Haskell at the Peabody Museum of Anthropology and Ethnology and Anibal Rodriguez at the American Museum of Natural History for helping me with my research and allowing me access to the collections. Finally, without the support and encouragement of my family and friends this thesis would not be possible. I am indebted to you all for your unconditional support and it means more to me than words can say. iv Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………….……..……………………….1 The Data Set……………………………………………………………………………….4 Identity…………………………………………………………...………………………..6 Sources of Interpretation………………………………………….……………………...10 Ornamentation……………………………………………….……………………….10 Mortuary Data………………………………………………………………………..12 Imagery……………………………...……………………………………………….13 Ethnography………………………………………………………………………….15 Organization of Thesis….………………………………………………………………..16 Chapter 2: Context and Background………………………………………………….19 Culture History of the Study Area…………………………………………………….....19 Basketmaker II……………………………………………………………………….20 Basketmaker III………………………………………………………………………26 Pueblo I………………………………………………………………………………28 Pueblo II……………………………………………………………………………...30 Pueblo III – A.D. 1150-1300………………………………………………………...33 Pueblo IV – 1300-1540………………………………………………………………36 Overview of Ornament Research in the Ancestral Puebloan Southwest...........................38 Raw Materials and Ornament Manufacture………………………………………….39 Distribution and Trade……………………………………………………………….42 Ornament Styles and Types………………………………………………………….46 Ornament Use………………………………………………………………………..48 Ornaments and Dress………………………………………………………………...51 Chapter 3: Social Identity and Adornment…………………………………………...53 Identity……………………………………………………………………………….53 Identity and Performance..…………………………………………………………...55 Identity and Inscription…..…………………………………………………………..57 Embodiment……..………………………………………………………………...…60 Dress and Identity …………………………………..……………………………….61 Adornment and Aesthetics ………………………………..…………………………63 A Theoretical Approach to Personal Adornment……………………………………...…64 Adornment and Identity in the Southwest……………………………………………….67 Group Membership, Social Role, Status, Sex/Gender and Age and Artifacts of Personal Adornment………………………………………………………………….69 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………..94 Chapter 4: Analytical Methods………………………………………………….…….96 Burial Data…………………………………………………………………………...…102 Site Data………………………………………………………………………...………102 Ornament Analysis Data……………………………………………………………..…102 v Material Types……………………………………………………………………...108 Manufacture………………………………………………………………………...111 Visual Media and Ethnographic Data ……………………………………………….....113 Limitations of the Data Set…………………………………………………………..…121 Mortuary Data: Interpretative Difficulties and Interpretive Potential……………...122 Ornament Analysis: Interpretive Difficulties……………………………………….131 Ethnographic Analysis: Interpretive Difficulties …………………………………..133 Chapter 5: Sources for Interpretation of Personal Adornment and Identity: Iconography and Ethnography…………………………………………………….....135 Imagery and Adornment………………………………………………………...……135 Rock Art…………………………………………………………………………….136 Kiva Murals………………………………………………………………………...139 Comparison of the Murals: Implications for Ornaments and Identity……………...159 Other Media………………………………………………………..……………….160 Adornment and Ethnography…………………………………………………………161 Chapter 6: Results and Interpretations.......................................................................172 The Burial Population ……………………………………………………………….…172 Ornaments in the Northern Southwest………………………………………………….175 Ornaments and Status…………………………………………………………………..203 Temporal Distribution of Ornaments…………………………………………………...205 Group Membership……………………………………………………………………..222 Summary…………………………………………………….………………………….229 Chapter 7: Conclusions and Future Research ………………………………….......230 Adornment and Adults………………………………………………………………….231 Adornment and Subadults……………………………………………………………....234 Dress and Adornment: Future Research………………………………………………..237 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………..………….239 References Cited.............................................................................................................240 Appendix A. Ornament and Burial Data……………………………………………265 vi List of Tables Table 2.1. Pecos Classification System Phases (adapted from Lipe 2003:Table 1.1)…...20 Table 2.2. Jernigan’s (1978) Bead Types by Period……………………………………..47 Table 2.3. Jernigan’s (1978) Pendant Types by Period………………………………….47 Table 2.4. Jernigan’s (1978) Other Ornament Types by Period…………………………48 Table 5.1. Kuaua Layer H-31…………………………………………………………..144 Table 5.2. Kuaua Layer G-26…………………………………………………………..145 Table 5.3. Kuaua - Other Layers…………………………….…………………….……146 Table 5.4. Pottery Mound Murals………………………………………………………150 Table 5.5. Awatovi and Kawaika-a……………………………………………………..157 Table 6.1: Distribution of Age and Sex for Single and Multiple Burials with Ornaments …………………………………………………………………………………………..173 Table 6.2. Ornament Material Types…………………………………...………………178 Table 6.3. Distribution of Ornament Types by Age and Sex…………………………...179 Table 6.4. Bead Styles………………………………………………………………….180 Table 6.5. Pendant Styles…………………………………………………...…………..181 Table 6.6. Distribution of hair ornaments and combs…………………………………..183 Table 6.7. Distribution of rings…………………………………………………………184 Table 6.8. Distribution of buttons…………………………………………...………….184 Table 6.9. Distribution of shell bilobed beads………………………………………….185 Table 6.10. Distribution of stone bilobed beads…………………………….………….186 Table 6.11. Flat Stone Disc Beads……………………………………………………...187 Table 6.12. Shell Disc Beads………………………………………………………...…188 Table 6.13. Distribution of Glycymeris shell bracelets…………………………………189 Table 6.14. Glycymeris Shell Pendants……………………………………….………..191 Table 6.15. Distribution of shaped shell pendants………………………………..…….192 Table 6.16. Distribution of shell tinklers……………………………………………….194 Table 6.17. Distribution of Olivella shell beads……………………………………......195 Table 6.18. Ornament locations on the body…………………….……………………..198 Table 6.19. Distribution of Olivella shell bead bracelets worn on left wrist……..…….201 Table 6.20. Distribution of Olivella shell bead bracelets worn on right wrist………….202 Table 6.21. Distribution of earrings…………………………………………………….202 Table 6.22. Earrings located near the ear……………………………………………….203 Table 6.23. Number of Ornaments by Gender and Age………………………………..204 Table 6.24. Ornament Types by Time period………………………..…………………207 Table 6.25. Distribution of Ornaments – Basketmaker II………………………………209 Table 6.26. Distribution of Basketmaker II Ornaments by Region………………….....210 Table 6.27. Distribution of Basketmaker III Ornaments……………………………….211 Table 6.28. Distribution of Basketmaker III Ornaments by Region…………………...211 Table 6.29. Distribution
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Jewelry Department
    I)1:PARTMEM STORE MERCll'Vs'DlSE TWA-NUALS i-,:i!.iiililliliiil!i:i: Courtesy of International Studio Coml) in Gold and Horn ( Frcncli Design) DEPARTMENT STORE MERCHANDISE MANUALS THE JEWELRY DEPARTMENT BEULAH ELFRETH KENNARD, M.A. Editor of Series; Director of Department Store Courses, New York University; Chairman of Committee on Merchan- dise Courses for New York City Public Schools; Former Educational Director of the Department Store Education Association. ASSISTED BY E. LILLIAN HUTCHINSON, B. A. Secretary Department Store Education Association CONSULTING EDITOR LEE GALLOWAY, Ph.D. Associate Professor Commerce and Industry, New York University; Secretary of National Association of Corpora- tion Schools; Director Educational Courses, National Commercial Gas Association. NEW YORK THE RONALD PRESS COMPANY 1917 40fX>G Copyright, 1917, by The Ronald Press Company ^^ \"\ X Sljia ^tv\SB tfl Sfbtrat^b to Mrs. Henry Ollesheimer, Miss Virginia Potter, Miss Anne Mor- gan, and other organizers of the Department Store Education As- sociation, who desiring to give greater opportunity for advance- ment to commercial employees and believing that all business efficiency must rest upon a solid foundation of training and education gave years of enthusiastic service to the testing of this belief. EDITOR'S PREFACE This series of department store manuals has been pre- pared for the purpose of imparting definite and authen- tic information to that growing army of salespeople who are not satisfied to be mere counter servers — to those who realize that their vocation is one of dignity and opportunity, and that to give satisfactory service to the customer they must possess a thorough knowledge of the goods they sell, as well as a knowledge of how best to P^ f\ sell them.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Worksheet (Grades 6–8)
    Name ______________________ Pueblo Indian History for Kids Student Worksheet (Grades 6–8) Overview Pueblo Indian History for Kids is an online timeline that tells the history of the Pueblo Indian people of the American Southwest. The timeline covers more than 15,000 years of history! Use this worksheet to guide your exploration of the timeline. As you move through the timeline, answer the questions below. Keep a list of questions you have as you explore. Go to: www.crowcanyon.org/pueblohistorykids Introduction 1. Who are the Pueblo Indians? 2. What other names are used to describe this group of people? 3. Where is the Mesa Verde region? 4. What does “Mesa Verde” mean, and what is the region’s environment like? 5. How is the environment of the Mesa Verde region similar to the environment where you live? How is it different? 6. What are two ways we can learn about Pueblo history? Can you think of others? 1 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (6–8) Paleoindian 1. What does the term “hunter-gatherer” mean? 2. How would you describe how people in your culture acquire food? Where do you get your food? 3. Identify two similarities and two differences between your life and that of Paleoindian people. Archaic 1. There were several major differences between the Paleoindian and Archaic periods. What were they and what is the evidence for these differences? 2. What important tools were used during the Archaic period? How did they change ways of life for people in the Mesa Verde region? 3. Why do you think there is not as much evidence for how people lived during the Paleoindian and Archaic periods as there is for later time periods? 2 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (6–8) Basketmaker 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Physalis Longifolia in the U.S
    The Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Wild Tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and Related Physalis Species: A Review1 ,2 3 2 2 KELLY KINDSCHER* ,QUINN LONG ,STEVE CORBETT ,KIRSTEN BOSNAK , 2 4 5 HILLARY LORING ,MARK COHEN , AND BARBARA N. TIMMERMANN 2Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA 3Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO, USA 4Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA 5Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA *Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] The Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Wild Tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and Related Physalis Species: A Review. The wild tomatillo, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and related species have been important wild-harvested foods and medicinal plants. This paper reviews their traditional use as food and medicine; it also discusses taxonomic difficulties and provides information on recent medicinal chemistry discoveries within this and related species. Subtle morphological differences recognized by taxonomists to distinguish this species from closely related taxa can be confusing to botanists and ethnobotanists, and many of these differences are not considered to be important by indigenous people. Therefore, the food and medicinal uses reported here include information for P. longifolia, as well as uses for several related taxa found north of Mexico. The importance of wild Physalis species as food is reported by many tribes, and its long history of use is evidenced by frequent discovery in archaeological sites. These plants may have been cultivated, or “tended,” by Pueblo farmers and other tribes. The importance of this plant as medicine is made evident through its historical ethnobotanical use, information in recent literature on Physalis species pharmacology, and our Native Medicinal Plant Research Program’s recent discovery of 14 new natural products, some of which have potent anti-cancer activity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction and Occupation of Unit 11 at Paquimé, Chihuahua
    THE CONSTRUCTION AND OCCUPATION OF UNIT 11 AT PAQUIMÉ, CHIHUAHUA DRAFT (February 5, 2009), comments welcomed! David A. Phillips, Jr. Maxwell Museum of Anthropology Department of Anthropology MSC01 1050, 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA Elizabeth Arwen Bagwell Desert Archaeology, Inc. 509 South 48th Street, Suite 104 Tempe, Arizona 85281 USA Abstract Understanding Paquimé’s internal development is important to regional prehistory, but the sheer amount of published data deters attempts to interpret the site’s construction history. The challenge can be reduced to a workable size by examining individual architectural units within the site. By way of illustration, a re-study of Unit 11 (House of the Serpent) indicates that its construction history may differ somewhat from the original published account. The approach used in the re-study is frankly experimental and is offered in the hope that others will be able to improve on it (or else prove its lack of utility). Three decades ago, in the most influential report ever prepared on northwest Mexican prehistory, Charles Di Peso and his colleagues described Paquimé (Di Peso 1974; Di Peso et al. 1974; see also Contreras 1985). Since then, the site’s construction history has received little detailed attention. Instead, recent discussions have focused on dating the site as a whole (End Note) or on the presence or absence of a multistory “east wing” (Lekson 1999a:80; 1999b; Phillips and Bagwell 2001; Wilcox 1999). In recent years, the most detailed studies of Casas Grandes construction have come from other Casas Grandes sites (Bagwell 2004; Kelley et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Pueblo Indian History for Kids Student Worksheet (Grades 4–6)
    Name ______________________ Pueblo Indian History for Kids Student Worksheet (Grades 4–6) Overview Pueblo Indian History for Kids is an online timeline that tells the history of the Pueblo Indian people of the American Southwest. The timeline covers more than 15,000 years of history! Use this worksheet to guide your exploration of the timeline. As you move through the timeline, answer the questions below. Keep a list of questions you have as you explore. Go to: www.crowcanyon.org/pueblohistorykids Introduction 1. Who are the Pueblo Indians? 2. What other names are used to describe this group of people? 3. Where is the Mesa Verde region? What is the environment like there? 4. How is the environment of the Mesa Verde region similar to the environment where you live? How is it different? 5. What are some of the different ways we can learn about the Pueblo past? 1 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (4–6) Paleoindian 1. What does the term “hunter-gatherer” mean? 2. How do you get your food? Where does it come from? Archaic 1. How is the Archaic period different than the Paleoindian period? 2. What two important tools were used during the Archaic time period? How were they used? Basketmaker 1. What made the Basketmaker time period different than the Archaic period? 2. Describe the diet of the Pueblo people during the Basketmaker time period. 3. What important structures were used during the Basketmaker period? How were they used? What structures do people use today with similar purposes? 2 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (4–6) Pueblo I 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Cultural Response in the Prehistoric American Southwest
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey Fall 2009 Climate Change and Cultural Response In The Prehistoric American Southwest Larry Benson U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Michael S. Berry Bureau of Reclamation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Benson, Larry and Berry, Michael S., "Climate Change and Cultural Response In The Prehistoric American Southwest" (2009). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 725. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/725 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CLIMATE CHANGE AND CULTURAL RESPONSE IN THE PREHISTORIC AMERICAN SOUTHWEST Larry V. Benson and Michael S. Berry ABSTRACT Comparison of regional tree-ring cutting-date distributions from the southern Col- orado Plateau and the Rio Grande region with tree-ring-based reconstructions of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) and with the timing of archaeological stage transitions indicates that Southwestern Native American cultures were peri- odically impacted by major climatic oscillations between A.D. 860 and 1600. Site- specifi c information indicates that aggregation, abandonment, and out-migration from many archaeological regions occurred during several widespread mega- droughts, including the well-documented middle-twelfth- and late-thirteenth- century droughts. We suggest that the demographic response of southwestern Native Americans to climate variability primarily refl ects their dependence on an inordinately maize-based subsistence regimen within a region in which agricul- ture was highly sensitive to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JEWELRY of POTTERY MOUND with a Comparison To
    THE JEWELRY OF POTTERY MOUND With a Comparison to Tijeras Pueblo By Lucy C. Schuyler Maxwell Museum Technical Series No. 26 Maxwell Museum of Anthropology University of New Mexico 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES......................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES......................................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.............................................................................................................. xi 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 1 Excavations at Pottery Mound............................................................................................. 2 Methods................................................................................................................................3 Overview of the Artifacts.....................................................................................................4 2. JEWELRY AND RELATED ARTIFACTS IN THE COLLECTIONS..................................... 5 Beads.................................................................................................................................... 6 Bone......................................................................................................................... 6 Shell........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pottery Mound, and a Comparison of Jewelry Found at the Two Sites
    THE JEWELRY OF TIJERAS PUEBLO By Lucy C. Schuyler Maxwell Museum Technical Series No. 15 Maxwell Museum of Anthropology MSC01, 1050, 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001 www.unm.edu/~maxwell 2010 (Revised 2011) Note added November 2011 In November, 2011, five turquoise pieces that had been on display at the Albuquerque Museum of Art and History (Figure A.1) were returned to the Maxwell Museum. These pieces were not available for close examination during my study, so the exact identity of certain artifacts was uncertain (see Page 84). Once the five pieces were returned to the Maxwell Museum, the pendant listed in the report as Catalogue No. 78.67.397 was found to correspond to Catalogue No. 78.67.111, listed as “unavailable for examination.” Likewise, the pendant listed as Catalogue No. 78.67.141B was found to correspond to Catalogue No. 78.67.397. The Tijeras jewelry Excel spreadsheet and master artifact spreadsheet have been updated to reflect the new information. As a result of these revisions, the number of artifacts originally reported is overstated by one. The total collection includes 450 specimens, 390 jewelry artifacts, and 92 pendants. L.C.S. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures.................................................................................................................................. v List of Tables...................................................................................................................................vi Foreword......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology of the Funeral Mound, Ocmulgee National Monument, Georgia
    1.2.^5^-3 rK 'rm ' ^ -*m *~ ^-mt\^ -» V-* ^JT T ^T A . ESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE Clemson Universii akCHEOLOGY of the FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE NATIONAL MONUMENT, GEORGIA TIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 3ERAL JCATK5N r -v-^tfS i> &, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary National Park Service Conrad L. Wirth, Director Ihis publication is one of a series of research studies devoted to specialized topics which have been explored in con- nection with the various areas in the National Park System. It is printed at the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price $1 (paper cover) ARCHEOLOGY OF THE FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE National Monument, Georgia By Charles H. Fairbanks with introduction by Frank M. Settler ARCHEOLOGICAL RESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • WASHINGTON 1956 THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM, of which Ocmulgee National Monument is a unit, is dedi- cated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and his- toric heritage of the United States for the benefit and enjoyment of its people. Foreword Ocmulgee National Monument stands as a memorial to a way of life practiced in the Southeast over a span of 10,000 years, beginning with the Paleo-Indian hunters and ending with the modern Creeks of the 19th century. Here modern exhibits in the monument museum will enable you to view the panorama of aboriginal development, and here you can enter the restoration of an actual earth lodge and stand where forgotten ceremonies of a great tribe were held.
    [Show full text]
  • THE Mckern “TAXONOMIC” SYSTEM and ARCHAEOLOGICAL CULTURE CLASSIFICATION in the MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES: a HISTORY and EVALUATION
    Published in Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 3-9 (1996). Excepting some very minor revisions and McKern's quote describing the structure and detail of his classification this was the paper read at the IInd Indianapolis Archaeological Conference, Sheraton Meridian Hotel, November 15, 1986, organized by Neal L. Trubowitz. Since the reader of this article does not have the contributions of the other participants that describe the system it was thought advisable that it be included. The proceedings of this event were to be published as a commemorative volume of the first conference, but this never occurred. THE McKERN “TAXONOMIC” SYSTEM AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL CULTURE CLASSIFICATION IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES: A HISTORY AND EVALUATION By B. K. Swartz, Jr. from Selected Writings ABSTRACT In the first half of the 20th century three major archaeological culture unit classifications were formulated in the United States. The most curious one was the Midwestern "Taxonomic" System, a scheme that ignored time and space. Alton K. Fisher suggested to W. C. McKern in the late 1920's that the Linnean model of morphological classification, which was employed in biology at a time of pre-evolutionary thinking, might be adapted to archaeological culture classification (Fisher 1986). On the basis of this idea McKern conceived the Midwestern Taxonomic System and planned to present his concept in a paper at the Central Section of the American Anthropological Association at Ann Arbor, Michigan, in April 1932. Illness prevented him from making the presentation. The first public statement was before a small group of archaeologists at the time of an archaeological symposium, Illinois Academy of Science, May 1932 (Griffin 1943:327).
    [Show full text]
  • Pinworm Infection at Salmon Ruins and Aztec Ruins: Relation to Pueblo III Regional Violence
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications Natural Resources, School of 12-2019 Pinworm Infection at Salmon Ruins and Aztec Ruins: Relation to Pueblo III Regional Violence Karl Reinhard Morgana Camacho Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresreinhard Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Environmental Public Health Commons, Other Public Health Commons, and the Parasitology Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Karl Reinhard Papers/ Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. ISSN (Print) 0023-4001 ISSN (Online) 1738-0006 Korean J Parasitol Vol. 57, No. 6: 627-633, December 2019 ▣ BRIEF COMMUNICATION https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2019.57.6.627 Pinworm Infection at Salmon Ruins and Aztec Ruins: Relation to Pueblo III Regional Violence 1 2, Karl J Reinhard , Morgana Camacho * 1School of Natural Resource Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA; 2Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Abstract: The study of coprolites has been a theme of archaeology in the American Southwest. A feature of archaeopar- asitology on the Colorado Plateau is the ubiquity of pinworm infection. As a crowd parasite, this ubiquity signals varying concentrations of populations. Our recent analysis of coprolite deposits from 2 sites revealed the highest prevalence of infection ever recorded for the region. For Salmon Ruins, the deposits date from AD 1140 to 1280.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SMOKING COMPLEX in the PREHISTORIC SOUTHWEST By
    The smoking complex in the prehistoric Southwest Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Simmons, Ellin A. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 00:29:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552017 THE SMOKING COMPLEX IN THE PREHISTORIC SOUTHWEST by Ellin A* Simmons A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 8 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library• Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: /// A- APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: ^ 7 ' T.
    [Show full text]