DOCSLIB.ORG

Chacoan Tower Kiva Sites of Kin Klizhin and Kin Ya'a

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chacoan Tower Kiva Sites of Kin Klizhin and Kin Ya'a INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand com er and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with with permission permission ofof the the copyrightcopyright owner.owner. Further reproductionreproduction prohibitedprohibited without without permission. permission. THE CHACOAN TOWER KIVA SITES OF KIM KLIZHIN AMD KIM YA'A by Paula Ann Massouh submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Applied Anthropology Chair: v v j/^ c Dr. Charles W. McNett. Jr./ Dr.' John Bodine Dean of, th^pollege of Arts and Sciences Date / ^ 1995 The American University Washington, D.C. 20016 1%5% ZSS AMERICAN UNIVERSITY LIBBAHY Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1381755 UMI Microform 1381755 Copyright 1996, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE CHACOAN TOWER KIVA SITES OF KIN KLIZHIN AND KIN YA'A BY PAULA ANN MASSOUH ABSTRACT Archaeologists continue to question whether to classify circular structures found in the prehistoric Southwest as kivas. This problem has been exacerbated by referring to circular, multistoried structures as tower kivas, thereby implying a ceremonial function. While the so-called tower kiva appears at various sites throughout the Southwest, its function may not necessarily be the same at each site, depending on context of the structure in which it is situated. A multidisciplinary approach can further an understanding of architecture as artifact. Archaeological data, as well as data from other disciplines, accompanied by an understanding of Puebloan cosmology, indicate that the Chacoan structures at two Chacoan outliers, Kin Klizhin and Kin Ya'a, may have functioned primarily as ceremonial centers with additional economic and administrative functions. However, their tower kivas, rather than functioning as kivas in a general sense, may have served as communication towers within a vast, regional network. ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Richard J. Dent, Jr., and the members of my committee, Dr. Charles W. McNett, Jr. and Dr. James Bodine, all of American University, for their constructive criticism of this thesis. I would also like to thank Joyce M. Raab, Archivist of the Chaco Archives, Albuquerque, for providing me with the photographs used in this thesis and for her patience in retrieving various documents pertinent to my research during my visit to the Chaco Archives. Thanks are also due to Dr. Lynne Sebastian, New Mexico Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer, for granting me permission to use some of the figures used in this thesis, and to Thomas C. Windes, archaeologist with the National Park Service, for clarifying some confusing aspects relating to this thesis. I also wish to thank my friend, Kathleen Klare, for helping my prepare the figures in the proper format. Last, but not least, I wish to thank the Educational Foundation of the American Association of University Women (AAUW) for providing me with a Career Development Grant during the 1993-94 academic year that was instrumental in helping me finish my course work, thereby enabling me to begin working on this thesis. iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ......................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................... iii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.............................. v Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE CHACO PHENOMENON ......... 1 2. PHYSIOGRAPHICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS .............................. 11 3. UNDERSTANDING PUEBLO ARCHITECTURE ........... 24 4. THE KIVA AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOUTHWESTERN ARCHAEOLOGY ................................ 37 5. BEYOND THE PECOS CLASSIFICATION............. 51 6. ANALYSIS OF KIN KLIZHIN AND KIN YA'A ......... 61 Architectural Attributes Tower Kivas Archaeological Attributes Physiographical and Environmental Attributes Cosmological Attributes 7. CONCLUSIONS................................ 90 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................... 114 iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. The Chacoan System at the Peak of Development during Early Pueblo III (A.D. 1050-1175) .... 2 2. Structure Map of the San Juan Basin .............. 13 3. Physiographic Areas ............................ 17 4. Analysis of Conflicting Cultures ............... 35 5. Characteristics of Pueblo I-III ................ 40 6. Round Room Features............................. 43 7. Kiva Definitions and Sources .................... 46 8. Definitions of Various Kiva Types and Sources . 50 9. Correlation of Calendrical Dates with Pecos Classification and Phase Systems for the Chaco A r e a ....................................... 53 10. Kiva Types of Bonito Phase Structures............ 56 11. Photograph of Kin Klizhin Tower K i v a ............ 62 12. Photograph of Kin Ya'a Tower K i v a ................ 63 13. Site Plan of Kin Klizhin ....................... 65 14. Site Plan of Kin Ya'a ........................... 66 15. Kin Kilzhin Community........................... 73 16. Kin Ya'a Community ............................. 74 v Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE CHACO PHENOMENON A millennium has almost passed since the Anasazi have dwelled in the American Southwest. This group has "been the subject of more romanticized, as well as scientific, attention than any other ancient Indian group in the United States" (Lister and Lister 1983:29). The unique culture they developed is sometimes referred to as the "Chacoan system" (Figure 1) which is . that wide manifestation of structures, sites, communities, roads, ceramics, and so forth, which are the material remains of a social-religious-economic network that functioned as a highly effective, well- integrated system in the San Juan Basin from about A.D. 900 to the mid 1100s (Judge 1989:210). This extraordinary type of organizational system is more commonly known as the "Chaco Phenomenon" (Irwin- Williams 1972). Whether characterized as "a flash of Anasazi cultural development" (Ferguson and Rohn 1987:279) or as "a period of Anasazi cultural efflorescence" (Morgan 1994:267), this period represents the development of one of the most fascinating cultures that has evolved out of the prehistoric Southwest. Four of the major distinguishable characteristics of the Chaco Phenomenon are: 1 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 ■CMIMNKY COCK PUKStO ALTO / - CMCTRO KCTL c • CC I U R R O W Cj • A . W A T C H A HAS V f °s ^ .■ ^ A L LAN TOW M S"'\ * - 3 V *•' T«yl»r 1. • ST*u<r^«« om »• jO» :m(s C**»0» «r»wC*w** I *»*>>(B t» >>)I I’v e • 0 Ou’wi H CiM<a4* t»v(«v>i i«ar *•«>'ia i« »-r* «*vo*» ffi C«“CB« i>avc’v«< u« •«teci«*ts co'«g«i» n**«« ct«Cbt » oo* •«’» nit’xvt «• «oi.f((t»f«ri ^ fc**vM** >*ea« iravc’tAi m o n m <k i *tt«<i*rt9 co>v«i” «!««■*• ciacit o» oe* mo’noso Qt«K« H O M I t««l - ■ $<-«■• itc i»r(«Mcr**t9*e* mo. nr> i n i >c (» m q n o» * * c Cm m w » *a to »«« r-«m v <m , , , » o ia . tM<«M*tc**tOMS *•« twovte* *a *uru»c ca«wta****i&*tm * ou«» t» am < S«*t»tlv« W**»» IKI.AI »-« ill U’lM. **»<- iMlatl. u« (WVilMfl.KO m I I U K I l«iwO« t« r*(i> >N4vt. «OVM. «0«a*Ci. {Ml* UN. SAC' "U*. )*4MQi«« •««. 0*^*0* *»»». AM’ *»*«•. U« ou’ v’ i x ir N c n A Ham »»«.»n iti. Figure 1. The Chacoan system at the peak of development during early Pueblo III (A.D. 1050-1175). Reprinted,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Student Worksheet (Grades 6–8)
    Name ______________________ Pueblo Indian History for Kids Student Worksheet (Grades 6–8) Overview Pueblo Indian History for Kids is an online timeline that tells the history of the Pueblo Indian people of the American Southwest. The timeline covers more than 15,000 years of history! Use this worksheet to guide your exploration of the timeline. As you move through the timeline, answer the questions below. Keep a list of questions you have as you explore. Go to: www.crowcanyon.org/pueblohistorykids Introduction 1. Who are the Pueblo Indians? 2. What other names are used to describe this group of people? 3. Where is the Mesa Verde region? 4. What does “Mesa Verde” mean, and what is the region’s environment like? 5. How is the environment of the Mesa Verde region similar to the environment where you live? How is it different? 6. What are two ways we can learn about Pueblo history? Can you think of others? 1 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (6–8) Paleoindian 1. What does the term “hunter-gatherer” mean? 2. How would you describe how people in your culture acquire food? Where do you get your food? 3. Identify two similarities and two differences between your life and that of Paleoindian people. Archaic 1. There were several major differences between the Paleoindian and Archaic periods. What were they and what is the evidence for these differences? 2. What important tools were used during the Archaic period? How did they change ways of life for people in the Mesa Verde region? 3. Why do you think there is not as much evidence for how people lived during the Paleoindian and Archaic periods as there is for later time periods? 2 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (6–8) Basketmaker 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Physalis Longifolia in the U.S
    The Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Wild Tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and Related Physalis Species: A Review1 ,2 3 2 2 KELLY KINDSCHER* ,QUINN LONG ,STEVE CORBETT ,KIRSTEN BOSNAK , 2 4 5 HILLARY LORING ,MARK COHEN , AND BARBARA N. TIMMERMANN 2Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA 3Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO, USA 4Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA 5Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA *Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] The Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Wild Tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and Related Physalis Species: A Review. The wild tomatillo, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and related species have been important wild-harvested foods and medicinal plants. This paper reviews their traditional use as food and medicine; it also discusses taxonomic difficulties and provides information on recent medicinal chemistry discoveries within this and related species. Subtle morphological differences recognized by taxonomists to distinguish this species from closely related taxa can be confusing to botanists and ethnobotanists, and many of these differences are not considered to be important by indigenous people. Therefore, the food and medicinal uses reported here include information for P. longifolia, as well as uses for several related taxa found north of Mexico. The importance of wild Physalis species as food is reported by many tribes, and its long history of use is evidenced by frequent discovery in archaeological sites. These plants may have been cultivated, or “tended,” by Pueblo farmers and other tribes. The importance of this plant as medicine is made evident through its historical ethnobotanical use, information in recent literature on Physalis species pharmacology, and our Native Medicinal Plant Research Program’s recent discovery of 14 new natural products, some of which have potent anti-cancer activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Pueblo Indian History for Kids Student Worksheet (Grades 4–6)
    Name ______________________ Pueblo Indian History for Kids Student Worksheet (Grades 4–6) Overview Pueblo Indian History for Kids is an online timeline that tells the history of the Pueblo Indian people of the American Southwest. The timeline covers more than 15,000 years of history! Use this worksheet to guide your exploration of the timeline. As you move through the timeline, answer the questions below. Keep a list of questions you have as you explore. Go to: www.crowcanyon.org/pueblohistorykids Introduction 1. Who are the Pueblo Indians? 2. What other names are used to describe this group of people? 3. Where is the Mesa Verde region? What is the environment like there? 4. How is the environment of the Mesa Verde region similar to the environment where you live? How is it different? 5. What are some of the different ways we can learn about the Pueblo past? 1 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (4–6) Paleoindian 1. What does the term “hunter-gatherer” mean? 2. How do you get your food? Where does it come from? Archaic 1. How is the Archaic period different than the Paleoindian period? 2. What two important tools were used during the Archaic time period? How were they used? Basketmaker 1. What made the Basketmaker time period different than the Archaic period? 2. Describe the diet of the Pueblo people during the Basketmaker time period. 3. What important structures were used during the Basketmaker period? How were they used? What structures do people use today with similar purposes? 2 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (4–6) Pueblo I 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Cultural Response in the Prehistoric American Southwest
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey Fall 2009 Climate Change and Cultural Response In The Prehistoric American Southwest Larry Benson U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Michael S. Berry Bureau of Reclamation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Benson, Larry and Berry, Michael S., "Climate Change and Cultural Response In The Prehistoric American Southwest" (2009). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 725. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/725 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CLIMATE CHANGE AND CULTURAL RESPONSE IN THE PREHISTORIC AMERICAN SOUTHWEST Larry V. Benson and Michael S. Berry ABSTRACT Comparison of regional tree-ring cutting-date distributions from the southern Col- orado Plateau and the Rio Grande region with tree-ring-based reconstructions of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) and with the timing of archaeological stage transitions indicates that Southwestern Native American cultures were peri- odically impacted by major climatic oscillations between A.D. 860 and 1600. Site- specifi c information indicates that aggregation, abandonment, and out-migration from many archaeological regions occurred during several widespread mega- droughts, including the well-documented middle-twelfth- and late-thirteenth- century droughts. We suggest that the demographic response of southwestern Native Americans to climate variability primarily refl ects their dependence on an inordinately maize-based subsistence regimen within a region in which agricul- ture was highly sensitive to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Pueblo III Towers in the Northern San Juan. Kiva 75(3)
    CONNECTING WORLDS: PUEBLO III TOWERS IN THE NORTHERN SAN JUAN Ruth M. Van Dyke and Anthony G. King ABSTRACT The towers of the northern San Juan, including those on Mesa Verde, Hovenweep, and Canyons of the Ancients National Monument, were constructed on mesa tops, in cliff dwellings, along canyon rims, and in canyon bottoms during the Pueblo III period (A.D. 1150–1300)—a time of social and environmental upheaval. Archaeologists have interpreted the towers as defensive strongholds, lookouts, sig- naling stations, astronomical observatories, storehouses, and ceremonial facilities. Explanations that relate to towers’ visibility are most convincing. As highly visible, public buildings, towers had abstract, symbolic meanings as well as concrete, func- tional uses. We ask not just, “What were towers for?” but “What did towers mean?” One possibility is that towers were meant to encourage social cohesiveness by invoking an imagined, shared Chacoan past. The towers reference some of the same ideas found in Chacoan monumental buildings, including McElmo-style masonry, the concept of verticality, and intervisibility with iconic landforms. Another possibility is that towers symbolized a conduit out of the social and envi- ronmental turmoil of the Pueblo III period and into a higher level of the layered universe. We base this interpretation on two lines of evidence. Pueblo oral tradi- tions provide precedent for climbing upwards to higher layers of the world to escape hard times. Towers are always associated with kivas, water, subterranean concavities, or earlier sites—all places that, in Pueblo cosmologies, open to the world below our current plane. RESUMEN Las torres del norte del San Juan, inclusive ésos en Mesa Verde, en Hovenweep, y en el monumento nacional de Canyons of the Ancients, fueron construidos en cimas de mesa, en casas en acantilado, por los bordes de cañones, y en fondos de cañones durante Pueblo III (dC.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Presentación. 2.Fundamentación
    1 UNIVERSIDAD VERACRUZANA INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES HISTORICO-SOCIALES INTRODUCCION A MESOMERICA Y NUEVOS DESCUBRIMIENTOS PROFR. DR. PEDRO JIMENEZ LARA I.I.H-S 1. Presentación. El presente curso pretende ofrecer una visión de los elementos y períodos culturales que identifican al México Antiguo. Las regiones son: oasisamérica, aridoamérica y mesoamérica Los horizontes que la componen son: arqueolítico, cenolítico inferior, cenolítico superior, protoneolítico, oasisamérica, aridoamérica, mesoamérica y los primeros contactos en el s. XVI: Planteamiento que se hace de esta manera para una mejor comprensión del curso y entender la evolución de los grupos asentados en territorio mexicano. 2.Fundamentación. Las área culturales del México Antiguo no solo se reduce a Mesoamérica como el período de máximo florecimiento que le antecedió a la conquista. En otros tiempos, antes de conocerse esta macroárea cultural, llegaron diversos grupos de cazadores-recolectores nómadas. El proceso evolutivo de estos grupos fue largo y lento, permitiendo avanzar e ir tocando diferentes niveles de desarrollo y los conocimientos necesarios para el cultivo y domesticación de las plantas como uno de los descubrimientos mas importantes durante esta fase que cambio el curso de la historia. Otra de las regiones es la llamada Oasisamérica localizada al sw de E.U. y norte de México, compuesta por grupos sedentarios agrícolas pero con una complejidad similar a la Mesoamericana. El área denominada mesoamérica, espacio donde interactuaron y se desarrollaron diversos grupos culturales, fue la “…sede de la mas alta civilización de la América precolombina. (Niederbeger, 11, 1996), se desarrollo en la mayor parte del territorio mexicano. Mesoamérica, definida así por Kirchhoff en 1943, es punto de referencia no solo para estudiosos del período prehispánico, en el convergen diversos especialistas amparados en diferentes corrientes ideológicas y enfoques: antropólogos, geógrafos prehistoriadores, historiadores, sociólogos, arquitectos, biólogos, sociólogos, por mencionar a algunos.
    [Show full text]
  • THE Mckern “TAXONOMIC” SYSTEM and ARCHAEOLOGICAL CULTURE CLASSIFICATION in the MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES: a HISTORY and EVALUATION
    Published in Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 3-9 (1996). Excepting some very minor revisions and McKern's quote describing the structure and detail of his classification this was the paper read at the IInd Indianapolis Archaeological Conference, Sheraton Meridian Hotel, November 15, 1986, organized by Neal L. Trubowitz. Since the reader of this article does not have the contributions of the other participants that describe the system it was thought advisable that it be included. The proceedings of this event were to be published as a commemorative volume of the first conference, but this never occurred. THE McKERN “TAXONOMIC” SYSTEM AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL CULTURE CLASSIFICATION IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES: A HISTORY AND EVALUATION By B. K. Swartz, Jr. from Selected Writings ABSTRACT In the first half of the 20th century three major archaeological culture unit classifications were formulated in the United States. The most curious one was the Midwestern "Taxonomic" System, a scheme that ignored time and space. Alton K. Fisher suggested to W. C. McKern in the late 1920's that the Linnean model of morphological classification, which was employed in biology at a time of pre-evolutionary thinking, might be adapted to archaeological culture classification (Fisher 1986). On the basis of this idea McKern conceived the Midwestern Taxonomic System and planned to present his concept in a paper at the Central Section of the American Anthropological Association at Ann Arbor, Michigan, in April 1932. Illness prevented him from making the presentation. The first public statement was before a small group of archaeologists at the time of an archaeological symposium, Illinois Academy of Science, May 1932 (Griffin 1943:327).
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    Great kivas as integrative architecture in the Silver Creek community, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Herr, Sarah Alice, 1970- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 02/10/2021 15:30:52 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/278407 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, soms thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SMOKING COMPLEX in the PREHISTORIC SOUTHWEST By
    The smoking complex in the prehistoric Southwest Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Simmons, Ellin A. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 00:29:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552017 THE SMOKING COMPLEX IN THE PREHISTORIC SOUTHWEST by Ellin A* Simmons A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 8 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library• Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: /// A- APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: ^ 7 ' T.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of New Mexico
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES A DATA RECOVERY PLAN FOR LA 9075, ALONG NM 53, CIBOLA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Stephen C. Lentz Submitted by Yvonne R. Oakes Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 270 SANTA FE 2000 NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY The Archaeological Site Stabilization and Preservation Project (ASSAPP), Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico, conducted a site evaluation of LA 9075 (the La Vega site), a large multicomponent site along NM 53 in Cibola County, New Mexico, on private lands and highway right-of-way. The New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department (NMSHTD) proposes to stabilize areas within the boundaries of the site and within the NMSHTD right-of-way that have been or may be affected by erosion. The Office of Archaeological Studies has been working under contract with the NMSHTD to identify endangered archaeological sites within highway rights-of-way. Subsequent to shoulder construction and improvement by the NMSHTD, additional cultural resources were exposed within the Museum’s project area. The OAS/ASSAPP program identified five major areas within the highway right-of-way at LA 9075 where cultural resources are threatened by erosion. These areas have been targeted for stabilization. In conjunction with the NMSHTD, District 6, the OAS proposes to conduct a data recovery program on the affected areas prior to stabilization efforts. NMSHTD Project No. TPE-7700 (14), CN 9163 MNM Project No. 41.596 (Archaeological Site Stabilization and Protection Project) Submitted in fulfillment of Joint Powers Agreement J0089-95 between the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department and the Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Identity in the Northern San Juan (24-3)
    ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST CONTINUE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR YOUR magazineFREE PDF (formerly the Center for Desert Archaeology) is a private 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization that explores and protects the places of our past across the American Southwest and Mexican Northwest. We have developed an integrated, conservation- based approach known as Preservation Archaeology. Although Preservation Archaeology begins with the active protection of archaeological sites, it doesn’t end there. We utilize holistic, low-impact investigation methods in order to pursue big-picture questions about what life was like long ago. As a part of our mission to help foster advocacy and appreciation for the special places of our past, we share our discoveries with the public. This free back issue of Archaeology Southwest Magazine is one of many ways we connect people with the Southwest’s rich past. Enjoy! Not yet a member? Join today! Membership to Archaeology Southwest includes: » A Subscription to our esteemed, quarterly Archaeology Southwest Magazine » Updates from This Month at Archaeology Southwest, our monthly e-newsletter » 25% off purchases of in-print, in-stock publications through our bookstore » Discounted registration fees for Hands-On Archaeology classes and workshops » Free pdf downloads of Archaeology Southwest Magazine, including our current and most recent issues » Access to our on-site research library » Invitations to our annual members’ meeting, as well as other special events and lectures Join us at archaeologysouthwest.org/how-to-help In the meantime, stay informed at our regularly updated Facebook page! 300 N Ash Alley, Tucson AZ, 85701 • (520) 882-6946 • [email protected] • www.archaeologysouthwest.org TM Archaeology Southwest Volume 24, Number 3 Center for Desert Archaeology Summer 2010 Social Identity in the Northern San Juan Paul Reed, Center for Desert Archaeology HE STUDY OF SOCIAL IDENTITY has emerged residents of the area were practicing an Archaic hunt- as an important issue in Southwestern archaeo- ing-and-gathering lifestyle.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Scale of Mesa Verde Anasazi Kivas
    5 Social Scale of Mesa Verde Anasazi Kivas William D. Lipe Pueblo I to III Mesa Verde settlements typically have one protokiva or kiva for each block of six to nine rooms, a pattern indicative ofkiva use by a relatively small and common social segment such as an extended family or minima/lineage. These ordinary small Pueblo I protokivas and Pueblo II and III kivas were probably used for both ritual and domestic activities. Chacoan outliers in the Mesa Verde area have fewer and larger kivas, and a less regular patterning of kivas to room blocks. Kivas at Chacoan sites may have functioned at a larger scale of social integration than at Mesa Verde settlements. At roughly AD.l300, approximately coincident with the abandonment of the Mesa Verde area, most Puebloans shifted from a Mesa Verde-like pattern of many small kivas to one of large plaza-oriented sites with only a few relatively large kivas. Following Steward (1937) and Adams (this volume), this suggests a larger integrative scale for kiva use, and stronger village-level organization. Continuities in kiva architec­ ture and ritual features suggest that aspects of the religious ideology associated with earlier kivas were incorporated into the new organization. Introduction struction of large pueblos around plazas became com­ mon in the Rio Grande through Western Pueblo areas, he model for this paper is Julian Steward's classic although Steward did not discuss this (but see Adams' T 1937 article entitled "Ecological Aspects of South­ comments in Chapter 11, this volume). western Society." In that paper, Steward used the ratio Following Prudden 'sandS teward 's lead, others have of rooms to kivas as a measure of the scale of social pursued similar or related approaches to using architec­ integration in both prehistoric and historic Pueblo com­ tural characteristics and spatial relationships as indica­ munities.
    [Show full text]