DOCSLIB.ORG

International Science Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Science Project Ground-based experiments – Via ISS – to remote space International science project Stage One: SIRIUS-17 Moscow, 2018 SSC RF – INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL PROBLEMS OF RAS IBMP management of project SIRIUS Orlov Oleg Igorevich IBMP Director, member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD. Co-director of the project, Chair of the Russian steering committee and the Russian program committee. Research and applied efforts are concentrated on advanced projects and clinical and physiological investigations related to the medical monitoring and care of space exploration crews. Belakovsky Mark Samuilovich Head of an IBMP department. Director assistant; chief manager; vice-chair of the Russian steering committee. Experienced in organization and conduction of major international projects in space medicine and biology. Honored worker of the public health care of Russian Federation, laureate of Russian Federation Government prize of science and technique, full member of International Academy of Astronautics, full member of Russian Academy of Cosmonautics named after K. E. Tsiolkovskiy. Demin Evgueni Pavlovich Head of an IBMP department. Technical director. Expert in atmospheric gas generation and supply systems, safety and EVA suits, integrated life support systems testing. Winner of the Russian Federation Governmental prize in science and technology. Suvorov Aleksander Vladimirovich Head of an IBMP department; MD. Principle investigator; vice-chair of the steering committee; vice-chair of the Russian Bioethics committee. Expert in space, underwater and sport medicine. Corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Cosmonautics named after K.E. Tsiolkovsky, honoured space technology tester; has awards of the Russian government and Federation of cosmonautics. Gushin Vadim Igorevich Deputy Head of the Department of IBMP RAS, MD. Co-chairman of the project program committee, head of the psycho-physiological section of the project program. Specialist in the psychology of labor, social psychology and psychophysiology. Winner of the Russian Federation Governmental prize in science and technology. Ponomarev Sergey Alexeevich Head of the Laboratory of IBMP RAS, Candidate of Medical Sciences. Scientific coordinator of the project. Specialist in the field of space immunology. Member of the Russian Academy of Cosmonautics. K.E. Tsiolkovsky. 2 HUMAN RESEARCH PROGRAM NASA HRP NASA management of project SIRIUS William Paloski, Ph.D. Director, NASA HRP. Co-director of the project Leads the efforts on behalf of NASA to develop and deliver research findings, health countermeasures, and human systems technologies to support human spaceflight. Expertise in the study of sensorimotor perforamnce of astronauts. Leticia Vega, Ph.D. Associate Chief Scientist, International Collaborations NASA HRP. Leads all international activities betweeen HRP and the international scientific community Expertise in the study of bacterial biofilms. Lisa Spence HRP US Project Manager, SIRIUS. Responsible for mission planning for HRP science Brandon Vessey, Ph.D. HRP US Science Implementation Manager, SIRIUS. Responsible for complement development of HRP science. Igor Savelev, Ph.D. HRP International Project Manager, SIRIUS. Responsible for planning and implementation of HRP science in NEK during SIRIUS mission. Igor Kofman HRP International Science Manager, SIRIUS. Responsible for integration and implementation of HRP science in NEK during SIRIUS mission. 3 SIRIUS INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE PROJECT About project SIRIUS It is intended that the SIRIUS program will take up to five years. SIRIUS embodies Humanity is standing at the threshold of a new the direction of the national space policy of stage in space exploration – departure from the Russian Federation through 2030 and Earth’s orbit to explore the nearest objects development prospects (approved by President in the solar system, such as the Moon and of the Russian Federation on April 19, 2013, Mars, with the prospect of building decree No. Pr- 906), drafted Russian piloted communities on these planetary bodies. cosmonautics strategy up to 2050 (State The International Space Station (ISS) is the corporation ROSCOSMOS, 2015) and the primary venue to study the impact of NASA strategic plan of sustained remote space spaceflight on human health and performance; exploration (NASA Transition Authorization Act however some human health risks are better of March, 2017). The SIRIUS program will build studied in analog environments which can upon the knowledge gathered during the MARS- mimic one or more aspects of 500 mission, as well as other ICC analogs from spaceflight. It allows investigators to study throughout the world regarding the medical and certain risks associated with spaceflight in a psychological risks humans may encounter controlled manner, develop countermeasures during long duration missions. SIRIUS will seek to that risk, then validate and implement those to find ways for crews to thrive while living and countermeasures on ISS and beyond. working away from Earth for months or years. One type of analog is known as an Isolated, Joint scientific analog studies are essential for Confined, and Controlled (ICC) analog. The the preparation of exploration missions in the crewmembers are physically isolated from future. Roscosmos and NASA signed a joint and have limited communication to the outside statement in 2017 reflecting on the common world. This allows the crewmembers to feel as vision for human exploration. NASA plans to if they are in an actual spaceflight expand human presence into the solar system environment. starting in the vicinity of the Moon using its new Risks studied in an ICC analog include: deep space exploration transportation systems. • Changes in cognitive and behavioral health; Exploration beyond low Earth orbit challenges • Adverse team performance; humanity’s current capabilities in human • Adverse physical heath and performance; spaceflight and will benefit from engagement • In mission medical monitoring, and by the international community. diagnostics; • Inadequate food, potable water, and supplies. These and other issues will be studied during the international project known as SIRIUS (Scientific International Research In Unique terrestrial Station) conducted cooperatively by the Russian SSC Institute of Biomedical Problems (RAS) and the NASA Human Research Program. Together, with partner- organizations and a broad participation of investigators from Russia, Germany, Italy, Japan, and other countries, the project will be implemented in a series of isolation campaigns with increasing length at the ground-based experimental complex (NEK) located at the Institute of Biomedical Problems (IBMP) in Moscow, Russia. The NEK is an analog platform with multifunctional segments that can accommodate three to 10 test subjects. 4 GROUND-BASED EXPERIMENTS – VIA ISS – TO REMOTE SPACE SIRIUS Stages of the project: integrated behavior studies was associated with the fact that these investigations were November 2017: 17 days (complete) directed strictly at evaluating the professional 2018: 14 days (dry run) readiness of the crewmember. Moreover, past pursuits of these objectives was complicated by 2018-2019: 4 months an acute shortage of methods and equipment. 2019-2020: 8 months The subsequent SIRIUS missions will focus 2021-2022: 1 year heavily in this area of study. Current hardware and software technologies make possible full- scale analysis of mixed team behavior, physical 2023-2025: Additional one-year missions and mental effects of prolonged exposure to (tentative) confinement, sensory deprivation, monotony, and limited communication with the outside world. This also allows the Stage one. development of countermeasures which can SIRIUS-17 (17-day isolation) be validated in flight. The significance of this SIRIUS-17 was the first mission in the project research cannot be overestimated in light of and served as a test run for the longer duration mixed crew missions and deployment of missions. The objectives for SIRIUS-17 included: planetary outposts planned by the 1) identifying types of investigations most international space community suitable for subsequent missions, 2) lessons learned from the integration of international science process of international participant and science integration, and 3) elaboration of the scientific data sharing protocols SIRIUS -17 began November 7, 2017 and concluded on November 24, 2017. Forty-four (44) studies were completed during the 17- day mission. These included studies on behavioral health, physiology, cellular biology and microbiological investigations; a list of investigations is located at the end of this booklet. After completion of the SIRIUS-17 mission, the Russian and US sides noted, with appraisal the overall success as evidence of its significance for joint Russian-US scientific projects. Lessons from the mission will be used by both sides in the course of preparations for the four-month mission of six crewmembers scheduled to begin in late 2018. Missions with planned durations of 8 and 12 months will follow. Next Stages. Planning for the four-month mission has begun. The long-standing, comprehensive isolation studies of human health and performance completed in the USSR and Russia in preparation for long- duration space flights beyond low Earth orbit were largely focused on testing human operations. However, virtually neglected has been the behavior aspects of humans while in confinement and sensory deprivation, the conditions of which they spend their mission. This
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia's Posture in Space
    Russia’s Posture in Space: Prospects for Europe Executive Summary Prepared by the European Space Policy Institute Marco ALIBERTI Ksenia LISITSYNA May 2018 Table of Contents Background and Research Objectives ........................................................................................ 1 Domestic Developments in Russia’s Space Programme ............................................................ 2 Russia’s International Space Posture ......................................................................................... 4 Prospects for Europe .................................................................................................................. 5 Background and Research Objectives For the 50th anniversary of the launch of Sputnik-1, in 2007, the rebirth of Russian space activities appeared well on its way. After the decade-long crisis of the 1990s, the country’s political leadership guided by President Putin gave new impetus to the development of national space activities and put the sector back among the top priorities of Moscow’s domestic and foreign policy agenda. Supported by the progressive recovery of Russia’s economy, renewed political stability, and an improving external environment, Russia re-asserted strong ambitions and the resolve to regain its original position on the international scene. Towards this, several major space programmes were adopted, including the Federal Space Programme 2006-2015, the Federal Target Programme on the development of Russian cosmodromes, and the Federal Target Programme on the redeployment of GLONASS. This renewed commitment to the development of space activities was duly reflected in a sharp increase in the country’s launch rate and space budget throughout the decade. Thanks to the funds made available by flourishing energy exports, Russia’s space expenditure continued to grow even in the midst of the global financial crisis. Besides new programmes and increased funding, the spectrum of activities was also widened to encompass a new focus on space applications and commercial products.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Exploration Roadmap
    The Global Exploration Roadmap January 2018 What is New in The Global Exploration Roadmap? This new edition of the Global Exploration robotic space exploration. Refinements in important role in sustainable human space Roadmap reaffirms the interest of 14 space this edition include: exploration. Initially, it supports human and agencies to expand human presence into the robotic lunar exploration in a manner which Solar System, with the surface of Mars as • A summary of the benefits stemming from creates opportunities for multiple sectors to a common driving goal. It reflects a coordi- space exploration. Numerous benefits will advance key goals. nated international effort to prepare for space come from this exciting endeavour. It is • The recognition of the growing private exploration missions beginning with the Inter- important that mission objectives reflect this sector interest in space exploration. national Space Station (ISS) and continuing priority when planning exploration missions. Interest from the private sector is already to the lunar vicinity, the lunar surface, then • The important role of science and knowl- transforming the future of low Earth orbit, on to Mars. The expanded group of agencies edge gain. Open interaction with the creating new opportunities as space agen- demonstrates the growing interest in space international science community helped cies look to expand human presence into exploration and the importance of coopera- identify specific scientific opportunities the Solar System. Growing capability and tion to realise individual and common goals created by the presence of humans and interest from the private sector indicate and objectives. their infrastructure as they explore the Solar a future for collaboration not only among System.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL Call for Papers & Registration of Interest
    ORGANIZED BY: HOSTED BY: st 71 INTERNATIONAL ASTRONAUTICAL CONGRESS 12–16 October 2020 | Dubai, United Arab Emirates Call for Papers & Registration of Interest Second Announcement SUPPORTED BY: Inspire, Innovate & Discover for the Benefit of Humankind IAC2020.ORG Contents 1. Message from the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) 2 2. Message from the Local Organizing Committee 2 3. Message from the IPC Co-Chairs 3 4. Messages from the Partner Organizations 4 5. International Astronautical Federation (IAF) 5 6. International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) 10 7. International Institute of Space Law (IISL) 11 8. Message from the IAF Vice President for Technical Activities 12 9. IAC 2020 Technical Sessions Deadlines Calendar 49 10. Preliminary IAC 2020 at a Glance 50 11. Instructions to Authors 51 Connecting @ll Space People 12. Space in the United Arab Emirates 52 www.iafastro.org IAF Alliance Programme Partners 2019 1 71st IAC International Astronautical Congress 12–16 October 2020, Dubai 1. Message from the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) 3. Message from the International Programme Committee (IPC) Greetings! Co-Chairs It is our great pleasure to invite you to the 71st International Astronautical Congress (IAC) to take place in Dubai, United Arab Emirates On behalf of the International Programme Committee, it is a great pleasure to invite you to submit an abstract for the 71st International from 12 – 16 October 2020. Astronautical Congress IAC 2020 that will be held in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The IAC is an initiative to bring scientists, practitioners, engineers and leaders of space industry and agencies together in a single platform to discuss recent research breakthroughs, technical For the very first time, the IAC will open its doors to the global space community in the United Arab Emirates, the first Arab country to advances, existing opportunities and emerging space technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Spaceflight in Social Media: Promoting Space Exploration Through Twitter
    Human Spaceflight in Social Media: Promoting Space Exploration Through Twitter Pierre J. Bertrand,1 Savannah L. Niles,2 and Dava J. Newman1,3 turn back now would be to deny our history, our capabilities,’’ said James Michener.1 The aerospace industry has successfully 1 Man-Vehicle Laboratory, Department of Aeronautics and Astro- commercialized Earth applications for space technologies, but nautics; 2Media Lab, Department of Media Arts and Sciences; and 3 human space exploration seems to lack support from both fi- Department of Engineering Systems, Massachusetts Institute of nancial and human public interest perspectives. Space agencies Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. no longer enjoy the political support and public enthusiasm that historically drove the human spaceflight programs. If one uses ABSTRACT constant year dollars, the $16B National Aeronautics and While space-based technologies for Earth applications are flourish- Space Administration (NASA) budget dedicated for human ing, space exploration activities suffer from a lack of public aware- spaceflight in the Apollo era has fallen to $7.9B in 2014, of ness as well as decreasing budgets. However, space exploration which 41% is dedicated to operations covering the Internati- benefits are numerous and include significant science, technological onal Space Station (ISS), the Space Launch System (SLS) and development, socioeconomic benefits, education, and leadership Orion, and commercial crew programs.2 The European Space contributions. Recent robotic exploration missions have
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 6 April-June 2020 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 6 The Crew Dragon mission to the ISS and the Commercial Crew Program ..................................... 6 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 7 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 7 COVID-19 and the European space sector ....................................................................... 7 Space technologies for European defence ...................................................................... 7 ESA Earth Observation Missions ................................................................................... 8 Thales Alenia Space among HLS competitors ................................................................... 8 Advancements for the European Service Module ............................................................... 9 Airbus for the Martian Sample Fetch Rover ..................................................................... 9 New appointments in ESA, GSA and Eurospace ................................................................ 10 Italy introduces Platino, regions launch Mirror Copernicus .................................................. 10 DLR new research observatory ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SOYUZ THROUGH the AGES the R-7 Rocket That Led to the Family of Soyuz Vehicles Launching Today Lifted Off for the First Time Onfeb
    RUSSIAN SPACE SOYUZ THROUGH THE AGES The R-7 rocket that led to the family of Soyuz vehicles launching today lifted off for the first time onFeb. 17, 1959. The last launch, on Dec. 27, 2018, was number 1,898. Irene Klotz and Maxim Pyadushkin Vostochny Cosmodrome anufactured by the Progress Rocket Space Center in Sama- Evolution of Soyuz-Family Launch Vehicles ra, Russia, the medium-lift expendable booster originally was used for Soviet-era human space missions and later became the R-7 Soyuz Soyuz-L workhorse for the country’s civilian and military space programs. M 1957 First launch of the ICBM (SS-6 1966-76 (32 launches, 1970-71 (three launches, Sapwood) that served as a basis for including 30 successful, all successful, The first rocket officially named Soyuz was launched in Soviet/Russian launch vehicles from Baikonur) from Baikonur) 1966 and has since flown 1,050 times, of which 1,023 were including the Soyuz family successful. Production of Soyuz rockets peaked in the early Soyuz 1980s at about 60 vehicles per year. Medium-Class Launch Vehicle Russia began offering Soyuz launch services internationally in the mid-1980s through Glavkosmos, a commercial entity set up to sell Soviet rocket and space technologies. Manufacturer: Progress Rocket Space Soyuz-U/-U2 Soyuz-M Center, Samara, Russia In 1996, Russia created Starsem, a joint venture (35% ArianeGroup, 25% Roscosmos, 25% RKTs Progress, 15% 1991 Breakup of the 1973-2017 1971-76 (eight launches, Soviet Union, (859 launches, including all successful, from Plesetsk) Dimensions Arianespace) that had exclusive rights to provide commercial launch services on Soyuz launch vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Launch Vehicles: Government Activities, Commercial Competition, and Satellite Exports
    Order Code IB93062 CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Space Launch Vehicles: Government Activities, Commercial Competition, and Satellite Exports Updated March 22, 2002 Marcia S. Smith Resources, Science, and Industry Division Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS U.S. Launch Vehicle Policy From “Shuttle-Only” to “Mixed Fleet” Clinton Administration Policy U.S. Launch Vehicle Programs and Issues NASA’s Space Shuttle Program Future Launch Vehicle Development Programs DOD’s Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Program Government-Led Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) Programs Private Sector RLV Development Efforts U.S. Commercial Launch Services Industry Congressional Interest Foreign Competition (Including Satellite Export Issues) Europe China Russia Ukraine India Japan LEGISLATION IB93062 03-22-02 Space Launch Vehicles: Government Activities, Commercial Competition, and Satellite Exports SUMMARY Launching satellites into orbit, once the Since 1999, projections for launch services exclusive domain of the U.S. and Soviet gov- demand have decreased dramatically, however. ernments, today is an industry in which compa- At the same time, NASA’s main RLV nies in the United States, Europe, China, Rus- program, X-33, suffered delays. NASA termi- sia, Ukraine, Japan, and India compete. In the nated the program in March 2001. Companies United States, the National Aeronautics and developing new launch vehicles are reassessing Space Administration (NASA) continues to be their plans, and NASA has initiated a new responsible for launches of its space shuttle, and “Space Launch Initiative” (SLI) to broaden the the Air Force has responsibility for launches choices from which it can choose a new RLV associated with U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Commercial Programs
    NASA Commercial Programs r rt., 1-1'7 ()A) L ; I - G NASA's Office of Commercial Programs: Providing a Focwfor Action Space has become an economic frontier, a new territory of commercial competition, where the spacefaring nations of the world seek new opportunities for industrial growth and economic benefit. In 1984, the United States Congress amended the 1958 Space Act to assign the National Aeronautics and Space Administration an important new mission: ' . seek and encourage, to the maximum extent possible, the fullest commercial use of space?' President Bush, in his first presidential address to ajoint session of Congress, sounded strong support for this national goal when he called for "more commercial development of space?' NASA?s Office of Commercial Programs is providing a focus for action to stimulate and assist an expanded involvement and investment by the U.S. private sector in civil space activities. Strengthened by a rich tradition of NASA cooperation with industry, the office supports new high-technology commercial space ventures, the commercial application of existing aeronautics and space technology, and greater access by commercial firms to available NASA capabilities and services. This report, prepared by the Public Affairs Office of the Office of Commercial Programs, highlights NASA-sponsored and assisted commercial space activities of the past year. For additional information, write to: BARBARA E. SELBY, Public Affairs Officer Office of Commercial Programs NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546 Contents: Letter 1989: Establishing a Strategic Vision The U.S. Private Sector in Space • Industrial R&D in Space • Centers for the Commercial Development of Space • New Cooperative Agreements Building U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuelling the Future of Mobility: Moon-Produced Space Propellants
    May 2021 Fuelling the future of mobility: Moon-produced space propellants Go Beyond The forthcoming decade is expected to witness a wave of missions to the Moon and Mars, and fuel supply is a major challenge to make these travels economically sustainable. The difference in the required energy to launch from Earth and from the Moon is causing people to reconsider refuelling point positions (e.g. NHRO, Near Halo Rectilinear Orbit) and contemplate using space-produced propellants. A whole production and transport value chain would have to be established on the Moon. Initial investments are sizeable (~$7B) but an economic oportunity for space propellants should exist if launch costs from Earth do not fall too much below current SpaceX standards. Capex optimization and increased scale should further improve the competitiveness of space propellants. Positive outcomes for ’terrestrial‘ applications are also expected to be significant. Fuelling the future of mobility: Moon-produced space propellants The Case for Moon-Produced Propellants The next decade is expected to witness After 2024, NASA expects to set up a a boom in Lunar and Mars exploration. base camp on the moon (’Artemis Base Space-exploration- After the space race of the 60s, there has Camp’) to be a long-term foothold for lunar been an unprecedented resurgence of exploration, as well as a Moon-orbiting driven technologies unmanned Lunar and Mars missions since station (’Gateway’) on the NHRO (Near the end of the 90s, as well as the spread Rectilinear Halo Orbit) being a site for also have very of space programs to various countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Spaceflight Plans of Russia, China and India
    Presentation to the Secure World Foundation November 3, 2011 by Marcia S. Smith Space and Technology Policy Group, LLC and SpacePolicyOnline.com “Civil” Space Activities in Russia “Civil” space activities Soviet Union did not distinguish between “civil” and “military” space programs until 1985 Line between the two can be quite blurry For purposes of this presentation, “civil” means Soviet/Russian activities analogous to NASA and NOAA (though no time to discuss metsats today) Roscosmos is Russian civil space agency. Headed by Army General (Ret.) Vladimir Popovkin Recent reports of $3.5 billion budget, but probably does not include money from US and others 11-03-11 2 Key Points to Take Away Space cooperation takes place in the broad context of U.S.-Russian relations Russia may not be a superpower today, but it is a global power and strategically important to the United States Complex US-Russian relationship, as New START and INKSNA demonstrate Russian space program modest by Soviet standards, but Retains key elements Leverages legacy capabilities for current activities and commercial gain Is a global launch service provider from four launch sites from Arctic to equator Proud history of many space “firsts,” but also tragedies and setbacks U.S.-Soviet/Russian civil space relationship has transitioned from primarily competition to primarily cooperation/interdependence today Cooperation not new, dates back to 1963, but much more intensive today U.S. is dependent on Russia for some things, but they also need us Bold dreams endure as Mars 500 demonstrates 11-03-11 3 Today is 54th Anniversary of First Female in Space 11-03-11 4 Just One of Many “Firsts” First satellite (Sputnik, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnographying the Training of Foreign Astronauts in Russia
    Corpus Mundi. 2020. Vol 1. No 2 | ISSN: 2686-9055 Representing Body | htteps://doi.org/10.>65339/cmj.v1i2.12 THE POLITICS OF HEROES’ BODY: ETHNOGRAPHYING THE TRAINING OF FOREIGN ASTRONAUTS IN RUSSIA Julie Patarin-Jossec (a) (a) Saint Petersburg State University / Thee Centre Emile Durkheim. Saint Petersburg, Russia / Bordeaux, France. Email: patarinjossec.julie[at]gmail.com Abstract If the literature in the history of the Soviet space program is extremely prolificc since the 1960s, including regarding cosmonaut embodiment, a lack remains regarding the contemporary reality of human spacefliight in Russia. As this article discusses, based on interviews and a long-term ethnography of the Russian training of astronauts from Western Europe, North America, and Japan, becoming an astronaut is to develop a le- gitimate body fictteing dominant cultural and gendered models. Theree mechanisms serve the manufacture of “heroes” and masculine bodies through the astronaut training: the historical narrative of human spacefliight; the values and virility atteributes embed as part of the training; and the instruments used in the daily activity of astronauts (such as spacesuits). Theis manufacture of a legitimate body, characterized by masculinity and discipline inherited from the past, is a heuristic ficeld for corporality and studies of global politics as it underlines how an interweaving of gender, Soviet heritage, and cultural fantasies frames the bodies of a professional elite. Keywords Astronaut training; discipline; ethnography; legitimate body; hero; human spacefliight; masculinity; star city; soviet heritage; virility Theis work is licensed under a Creative Commons «Atteribution» >.0 International License. 1> Corpus Mundi. 2020. Том 1. No 2 | ISSN: 2686-9055 Представляя тело | htteps://doi.org/10.>65339/cmj.v1i2.12 ПОЛИТИКА ГЕРОИЧЕСКОГО ТЕЛА: ЭТНОГРАФИЯ ПОДГОТОВКИ ИНОСТРАННЫХ КОСМОНАВТОВ В РОССИИ Патарин-Жоссек Жюли (a) (a) ФГБОУ ВО "Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет" / Центр Эмиля Дюркгейма.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Launch Vehicles: Government Activities, Commercial Competition, and Satellite Exports
    Order Code IB93062 CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Space Launch Vehicles: Government Activities, Commercial Competition, and Satellite Exports Updated October 6, 2003 Marcia S. Smith Resources, Science, and Industry Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS U.S. Launch Vehicle Policy From “Shuttle-Only” to “Mixed Fleet” Clinton Administration Policy George W. Bush Administration Activity U.S. Launch Vehicle Programs and Issues NASA’s Space Shuttle Program New U.S. Expendable and Reusable Launch Vehicles NASA’s Efforts to Develop New Reusable Launch Vehicles (RLVs) Private Sector RLV Development Efforts DOD’s Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Program U.S. Commercial Launch Services Industry Congressional Interest Foreign Launch Competition (Including Satellite Export Issues) Europe China Russia Ukraine India Japan Satellite Exports: Agency Jurisdiction and Other Continuing Issues LEGISLATION For more information on the space shuttle program, see: CRS Report RS21408, NASA’s Space Shuttle Columbia: Quick Facts and Issues for Congress CRS Report RS21606, NASA’s Space Shuttle Columbia: Synopsis of the Report of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board CRS Report RS21411, NASA’s Space Shuttle Program: Space Shuttle Appropriations FY1992-FY2002 CRS Report RS21419, NASA’s Space Shuttle Program: Excerpts from Recent Reports and Hearings Regarding Shuttle Safety For information on the Orbital Space Plane, which is not a launch vehicle, but a spacecraft, see CRS Issue Brief IB93017, Space Stations. IB93062 10-06-03 Space Launch Vehicles: Government Activities, Commercial Competition, and Satellite Exports SUMMARY Launching satellites into orbit, once the plans to refocus its latest RLV development exclusive domain of the U.S.
    [Show full text]