DOCSLIB.ORG

The 2019 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation—Land Remote

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 2019 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation—Land Remote 2019 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation— Land Remote Sensing Satellite Compendium Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation NASA • NGA • NOAA • USDA • USGS Circular 1455 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Image of Landsat 8 satellite over North America. Source: AGI’s System Tool Kit. Facing page. In shallow waters surrounding the Tyuleniy Archipelago in the Caspian Sea, chunks of ice were the artists. The 3-meter-deep water makes the dark green vegetation on the sea bottom visible. The lines scratched in that vegetation were caused by ice chunks, pushed upward and downward by wind and currents, scouring the sea floor. 2019 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation—Land Remote Sensing Satellite Compendium By Jon B. Christopherson, Shankar N. Ramaseri Chandra, and Joel Q. Quanbeck Circular 1455 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials JACIE as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Christopherson, J.B., Ramaseri Chandra, S.N., and Quanbeck, J.Q., 2019, 2019 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation—Land remote sensing satellite compendium: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1455, 191 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1455. ISSN 1067-084X (print) ISSN 2330-5703 (online) ISBN 978-1-4113-4322-1 iii Preface The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Land Imaging Program (NLIP) has a responsibility to provide imagery for the Nation in support of science, land management, and other needs. The USGS NLIP operates the Landsat series of satellites, and actively manages 46 years of imagery from diverse sources as a continuous record of our changing planet. To understand the user needs for Earth observation, measurement, and monitoring, the Require- ments, Capabilities, and Analysis for Earth Observation (RCA-EO) Project has been established. One of the missions of the RCA-EO Project is to identify and catalog existing and planned capabilities for measuring and monitoring the Earth. The RCA-EO Project also supports the Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation (JACIE) mission and developed this compendium as one of the USGS contributions to the JACIE effort. This publication was produced by the USGS NLIP RCA-EO Project Team (Gregory Stensaas, Project Manager) under the Observing Systems Branch (Jennifer Lacey, Branch Chief) at the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. Authors: Jon B. Christopherson, KBR, contractor for the USGS. Shankar N. Ramaseri Chandra, KBR, contractor for the USGS. Joel Q. Quanbeck, KBR, contractor for the USGS. JACIE iv Acknowledgments In the 1990s and 2000s, William “Bill” Stoney, after a long and distinguished career at NASA including serving as Director of NASA’s Earth Observation Programs, compiled and maintained a list of land-imaging satellites. He shared this list for general reference and for the general ben- efit of the remote sensing community. Bill realized the beginnings of the rapid growth of Earth observation and, through his list, helped others understand what was happening in the industry. The American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing published the 2008 version of Bill’s ASPRS GUIDE TO LAND IMAGING SATELLITES on the American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing website, where it remains available. In recent years, calls have been made for a new, updated version of the “Bill Stoney list.” We hope that this compendium is an answer to those calls and begins to fill the niche that Mr. Stoney created. Thanks, Bill! JACIE v Contents Preface ...........................................................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................iv Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation ................................................................................1 The Compendium of Land Remote Sensing Satellites ....................................................................1 Changes in Remote Sensing ........................................................................................................................3 Compendium Coverage, Conventions, and Caveats .......................................................................3 History of Land Remote Sensing from Space ...........................................................................................5 First Images of the Earth from Space ................................................................................................5 First Imagery from Orbit ..............................................................................................................5 Early Drivers of Earth Remote Sensing ....................................................................................5 Weather Imaging .........................................................................................................................5 Defense Reconnaissance—Corona .........................................................................................6 Dedicated Civil Land Imaging .............................................................................................................7 1972–99—Slow, Steady Growth ................................................................................................7 2000–Present—Accelerating Rapid Growth ...........................................................................7 Contributing Trends—Space is Cheaper and Easier ....................................................................10 Satellite Costs and Reliability ..................................................................................................10 Launch Services—Availability and Cost ................................................................................10 Supporting Infrastructure .........................................................................................................10 Contributing Trends—Remotely Sensed Data Usage ...................................................................10 Information Technology ............................................................................................................10 Supporting Factors ....................................................................................................................11 Trends in Satellite Land Remote Sensing ..............................................................................11 The Four Resolutions .................................................................................................................11 Synthetic Aperture Radar—The Promise of Radar .............................................................13 JACIE References Cited..........................................................................................................................................13 Orbits of Earth Observation Satellites ......................................................................................................15 Sun-Synchronous Repeat Orbits ......................................................................................................15 Subrecurrent Orbit ..............................................................................................................................15 Geosynchronous Orbit .......................................................................................................................16 Low-Altitude Orbits—International Space Station Orbit .............................................................18 Combined Repeat Cycle of Sentinel-2 and Landsat Satellites ....................................................18 Remote Sensing Law and Policy ...............................................................................................................21 Historic Development—Reconnaissance to Commercial Remote Sensing Policy .................21 Current Remote Sensing Policies of Major Space Remote Sensing Countries .......................22 United States ..............................................................................................................................22 Canada .........................................................................................................................................23 France ..........................................................................................................................................23 Germany ......................................................................................................................................23
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Space Age The
    SPACE SCIENCE THE NEW SPACE AGE 4 TWAS Newsletter, Vol. 26 No. 4, 2014 SPECIAL report: Space SCIENCE India is orbiting Mars. China is on the Moon. Even nations like Turkmenistan, Ecuador and Malaysia are sending satellites aloft. But what do they all hope to accomplish? by Sean Treacy ot long ago, a 41-metre rocket thrust off a space age joined by nations great and small. Nlaunch pad in China and ascended toward At least 35 developing countries now have space. Once it escaped Earth’s atmosphere, their own space agencies, and about the same it released a little cube, only 10-by-10-by-10 number have had a satellite in orbit. In the two centimetres. And then, as the cube slowly years since Pegaso’s launch, Peru, Uruguay and stretched out the solar panels on its sides and Turkmenistan have also reached Earth’s orbit drifted into orbit, a control room in Ecuador for the first time. Other countries, such as Costa burst into applause. Rica, Ethiopia and Tunisia, are planning to finish The box was Ecuador’s first satellite – a their first satellites in coming years. compact, inexpensive device called a CubeSat. Mazlan Othman, Malaysia’s first astrophysicist This one was named Pegaso – Spanish for and the former director of the United Nations Pegasus – and on 26 April 2013 it was the Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), said centre of attention for a huge portion of this drive for developing countries to enter Ecuador’s 15 million people. In the days after space science is partly due to space’s special the launch they toasted to Pegaso across the power to instill optimism.
    [Show full text]
  • EOOS Posters Abstracts
    Posters Submissions – EOOS Conference 21 23 November 2018 1. Sylvie Pouliquen Ifremer [email protected] Authors: "Gille Reverdin CNRS/INSU email: [email protected] , Pierre-Yves Le Traon Ifremer & Mercator-Ocean email: [email protected]) and the Coriolis 2014-2020 steering committee." Theme: From standalone to integrated ocean and coastal observing platforms Title: Coriolis: an integrated in-situ ocean observation infrastructure for operational oceanography and ocean/climate research "The Coriolis (www.coriolis.eu.org) structure gathers efforts of seven French institutes (CNES, CNRS, IFREMER, IPEV, IRD, Météo-France, SHOM, CEREMA) to organize the in-situ component of the French operational oceanography infrastructure. The objective is to organize the data acquisition and real- time/delayed mode data processing of in-situ measurements required for operational oceanography and ocean/climate research. Coriolis is focused on a limited number of physical and biogeochemical parameters that are acquired systematically and in real time or slightly delayed mode. Coriolis follows a fully open data policy. The framework of collaboration for Coriolis was renewed in 2014 and now covers the time period of 2014 up to 2020. By signing this new agreement, the eight directors of French institutes have clearly stated their willingness to sustain and consolidate further the Coriolis in-situ infrastructure. The new framework agreement strengthens the links between research and operational oceanography. The scope is also extended to integrate the main French contributions to the global and regional in-situ observing systems: Argo, gliders, research vessels, ship of opportunities, drifting buoys, marine mammals, tidal networks and high frequency coastal observatories.
    [Show full text]
  • Dod Space Technology Guide
    Foreword Space-based capabilities are integral to the U.S.’s national security operational doctrines and processes. Such capa- bilities as reliable, real-time high-bandwidth communica- tions can provide an invaluable combat advantage in terms of clarity of command intentions and flexibility in the face of operational changes. Satellite-generated knowledge of enemy dispositions and movements can be and has been exploited by U.S. and allied commanders to achieve deci- sive victories. Precision navigation and weather data from space permit optimal force disposition, maneuver, decision- making, and responsiveness. At the same time, space systems focused on strategic nuclear assets have enabled the National Command Authorities to act with confidence during times of crisis, secure in their understanding of the strategic force postures. Access to space and the advantages deriving from operat- ing in space are being affected by technological progress If our Armed Forces are to be throughout the world. As in other areas of technology, the faster, more lethal, and more precise in 2020 advantages our military derives from its uses of space are than they are today, we must continue to dynamic. Current space capabilities derive from prior invest in and develop new military capabilities. decades of technology development and application. Joint Vision 2020 Future capabilities will depend on space technology programs of today. Thus, continuing investment in space technologies is needed to maintain the “full spectrum dominance” called for by Joint Vision 2010 and 2020, and to protect freedom of access to space by all law-abiding nations. Trends in the availability and directions of technology clearly suggest that the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Dimensions Leader's Guide
    Leader Guide www.capmembers.com/ae Leader Guide for Aerospace Dimensions 2011 Published by National Headquarters Civil Air Patrol Aerospace Education Maxwell AFB, Alabama 3 LEADER GUIDES for AEROSPACE DIMENSIONS INTRODUCTION A Leader Guide has been provided for every lesson in each of the Aerospace Dimensions’ modules. These guides suggest possible ways of presenting the aerospace material and are for the leader’s use. Whether you are a classroom teacher or an Aerospace Education Officer leading the CAP squadron, how you use these guides is up to you. You may know of different and better methods for presenting the Aerospace Dimensions’ lessons, so please don’t hesitate to teach the lesson in a manner that works best for you. However, please consider covering the lesson outcomes since they represent important knowledge we would like the students and cadets to possess after they have finished the lesson. Aerospace Dimensions encourages hands-on participation, and we have included several hands-on activities with each of the modules. We hope you will consider allowing your students or cadets to participate in some of these educational activities. These activities will reinforce your lessons and help you accomplish your lesson out- comes. Additionally, the activities are fun and will encourage teamwork and participation among the students and cadets. Many of the hands-on activities are inexpensive to use and the materials are easy to acquire. The length of time needed to perform the activities varies from 15 minutes to 60 minutes or more. Depending on how much time you have for an activity, you should be able to find an activity that fits your schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Rafael Space Propulsion
    Rafael Space Propulsion CATALOGUE A B C D E F G Proprietary Notice This document includes data proprietary to Rafael Ltd. and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed, in whole or in part, for any purpose without written authorization from Rafael Ltd. Rafael Space Propulsion INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW PART A: HERITAGE PART B: SATELLITE PROPULSION SYSTEMS PART C: PROPELLANT TANKS PART D: PROPULSION THRUSTERS Satellites Launchers PART E: PROPULSION SYSTEM VALVES PART F: SPACE PRODUCTION CAPABILITIES PART G: QUALITY MANAGEMENT CATALOGUE – Version 2 | 2019 Heritage PART A Heritage 0 Heritage PART A Rafael Introduction and Overview Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd. designs, develops, manufactures and supplies a wide range of high-tech systems for air, land, sea and space applications. Rafael was established as part of the Ministry of Defense more than 70 years ago and was incorporated in 2002. Currently, 7% of its sales are re-invested in R&D. Rafael’s know-how is embedded in almost every operational Israel Defense Forces (IDF) system; the company has a special relationship with the IDF. Rafael has formed partnerships with companies with leading aerospace and defense companies worldwide to develop applications based on its proprietary technologies. Offset activities and industrial co-operations have been set-up with more than 20 countries world-wide. Over the last decade, international business activities have been steadily expanding across the globe, with Rafael acting as either prime-contractor or subcontractor, capitalizing on its strengths at both system and sub-system levels. Rafael’s highly skilled and dedicated workforce tackles complex projects, from initial development phases, through prototype, production and acceptance tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Payload Capabilities for Space Missions
    INDIAN PAYLOAD CAPABILITIES FOR 13, Bangalore - SPACE MISSIONS July 11 A.S. Kiran Kumar Director Space Applications Centre International ASTROD Symposium, Ahmedabad th 5 Application-specific EO payloads IMS-1(2008) RISAT-1 (2012) MX/ HySI-T C-band SAR CARTOSAT-2/2A/2B RESOURCESAT-2 (2011) (2007/2009/2010) LISS 3/ LISS 4/AWiFS PAN RESOURCESAT-1 (2003) LISS 3/ LISS 4 AWiFS CARTOSAT-1 (2005) (Operational) STEREOPAN Megha-Tropiques (2011) TES(2001) MADRAS/SAPHIR/ScARaB/ Step& Stare ROSA PAN OCEANSAT-2 (2009) OCM/ SCAT/ROSA YOUTHSAT(2011) LiV HySI/RaBIT INSAT-3A (2003) KALPANA-1 (2002) VHRR, CCD VHRR Application-specific EO payloads GISAT MXVNIR/SWIR/TIR/HySI RISAT-3 RESOURCESAT-3A/3B/3C L-band SAR CARTOSAT-3 RESOURCESAT-2A LISS 3/LISS 4/AWiFS PAN LISS3/LISS4/AWiFS RESOURCESAT-3 LISS 3/LISS 4/ CARTOSAT-2C/2D AWiFS (Planned) PAN RISAT-1R C-band SAR SARAL Altimeter/ARGOS OCEANSAT-3 OCM , TIR GISAT MXVNIR/SWIR/ INSAT- 3D TIR/HySI Imager/Sounder EARTH OBSERVATION (LAND AND WATER) RESOURCESAT-1 IMS-1 RESOURCESAT-2 RISAT-1 RESOURCESAT-2A RESOURCESAT-3 RESOURCESAT-3A/3B/3C RISAT-3 GISAT RISAT-1R EARTH OBSERVATION (CARTOGRAPHY) TES CARTOSAT-1 CARTOSAT-2/2A/2B RISAT-1 CARTOSAT-2C/2D CARTOSAT-3 RISAT-3 RISAT-1R EARTH OBSERVATION (ATMOSPHERE & OCEAN) KALPANA-1 INSAT- 3A OCEANSAT-1 INSAT-3D OCEANSAT-2 YOUTHSAT GISAT MEGHA–TROPIQUES OCEANSAT-3 SARAL Current observation capabilities : Optical Payload Sensors in Spatial Res. Swath/ Radiometry Spectral bands Repetivity/ operation Coverage (km) revisit CCD 1 1 Km India & 10 bits 3 (B3, B4, B5) 4 times/ day surround.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Systems
    Chapter 18 REST-OF-WORLD (ROW) SATELLITE SYSTEMS For the longest time, space exploration was an exclusive club comprised of only two members, the United States and the Former Soviet Union. That has now changed due to a number of factors, among the more dominant being economics, advanced and improved technologies and national imperatives. Today, the number of nations with space programs has risen to over 40 and will continue to grow as the costs of spacelift and technology continue to decrease. RUSSIAN SATELLITE SYSTEMS The satellite section of the Russian In the post-Soviet era, Russia contin- space program continues to be predomi- ues its efforts to improve both its military nantly government in character, with and commercial space capabilities. most satellites dedicated either to civil/ These enhancements encompass both military applications (such as communi- orbital assets and ground-based space cations and meteorology) or exclusive support facilities. Russia has done some military missions (such as reconnaissance restructuring of its operating principles and targeting). A large portion of the regarding space. While these efforts have Russian space program is kept running by attempted not to detract from space-based launch services, boosters and launch support to military missions, economic sites, paid for by foreign commercial issues and costs have lead to a lowering companies. of Russian space-based capabilities in The most obvious change in Russian both orbital assets and ground station space activity in recent years has been the capabilities. decrease in space launches and corre- The influence of Glasnost on Russia's sponding payloads. Many of these space programs has been significant, but launches are for foreign payloads, not public announcements regarding space Russian.
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare in a Fragile World: Military Impact on the Human Environment
    Recent Slprt•• books World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbook 1979 World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbooks 1968-1979, Cumulative Index Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Weapon Proliferation Other related •• 8lprt books Ecological Consequences of the Second Ihdochina War Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Environment Publish~d on behalf of SIPRI by Taylor & Francis Ltd 10-14 Macklin Street London WC2B 5NF Distributed in the USA by Crane, Russak & Company Inc 3 East 44th Street New York NY 10017 USA and in Scandinavia by Almqvist & WikseH International PO Box 62 S-101 20 Stockholm Sweden For a complete list of SIPRI publications write to SIPRI Sveavagen 166 , S-113 46 Stockholm Sweden Stoekholol International Peace Research Institute Warfare in a Fragile World Military Impact onthe Human Environment Stockholm International Peace Research Institute SIPRI is an independent institute for research into problems of peace and conflict, especially those of disarmament and arms regulation. It was established in 1966 to commemorate Sweden's 150 years of unbroken peace. The Institute is financed by the Swedish Parliament. The staff, the Governing Board and the Scientific Council are international. As a consultative body, the Scientific Council is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. Governing Board Dr Rolf Bjornerstedt, Chairman (Sweden) Professor Robert Neild, Vice-Chairman (United Kingdom) Mr Tim Greve (Norway) Academician Ivan M£ilek (Czechoslovakia) Professor Leo Mates (Yugoslavia) Professor
    [Show full text]
  • August 2011 Updates UNSPIDER
    UN-SPIDER November 2011 Updates Please forward this issue of UN-SPIDER Updates to colleagues who might Follow UN-SPIDER on benefit from receiving the information. If you would like to subscribe to this list please visit the following website: http://mail.un-spider.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unspider UN-SPIDER News 1. UN-SPIDER Conference in Beijing UN-SPIDER organised the “United Nations Conference on Space-based Technologies for Disaster Management - Best Practices for Risk Reduction and Rapid Response Mapping” on 22-25 November 2011. The conference brought together 128 participants from 42 countries representing 93 national, regional and international organizations, non-government organizations, the private sector and academia representing all the continents. Participants represented civil protection agencies, emergency management organizations, space agencies, remote sensing agencies, research institutions, ministries of environment and natural resources, science and technology bureaus, and other government and non-government agencies. The conference included 7 plenary sessions that incorporated 36 presentations from the experts and users of the technology, 3 side meetings and 3 breakout discussion sessions. It covered a range of topics including advancements in technology, best practices in disaster risk management, experiences in rapid response mapping, etc. Outcomes and impacts of the recent UN-SPIDER technical advisory missions were discussed. For further information and the Conference Report >> UN-SPIDER 2. Second UN-SPIDER International Expert Meeting: Crowdsource Mapping for Preparedness and Emergency Response which took place in Geneva, Switzerland on 16 November 2011 This one-day Expert Meeting brought together 72 experts and practitioners from 21 countries. This second Expert Meeting was purposely organised back-to-back with the International Conference on Crisis Mapping (ICCM 2011) (http://crisismappers.net/page/iccm-geneva-2011).
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Years of Indian Remote Sensing Satellite (IRS)
    2525 YearsYears ofof IndianIndian RemoteRemote SensingSensing SatelliteSatellite (IRS)(IRS) SeriesSeries Vinay K Dadhwal Director National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), ISRO Hyderabad, INDIA 50 th Session of Scientific & Technical Subcommittee of COPUOS, 11-22 Feb., 2013, Vienna The Beginning • 1962 : Indian National Committee on Space Research (INCOSPAR), at PRL, Ahmedabad • 1963 : First Sounding Rocket launch from Thumba (Nov 21, 1963) • 1967 : Experimental Satellite Communication Earth Station (ESCES) established at Ahmedabad • 1969 : Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) established (15 August) PrePre IRSIRS --1A1A SatellitesSatellites • ARYABHATTA, first Indian satellite launched in April 1975 • Ten satellites before IRS-1A (7 for EO; 2 Met) • 5 Procured & 5 SLV / ASLV launch SAMIR : 3 band MW Radiometer SROSS : Stretched Rohini Series Satellite IndianIndian RemoteRemote SensingSensing SatelliteSatellite (IRS)(IRS) –– 1A1A • First Operational EO Application satellite, built in India, launch USSR • Carried 4-band multispectral camera (3 nos), 72m & 36m resolution Satellite Launch: March 17, 1988 Baikanur Cosmodrome Kazakhstan SinceSince IRSIRS --1A1A • Established of operational EO activities for – EO data acquisition, processing & archival – Applications & institutionalization – Public services in resource & disaster management – PSLV Launch Program to support EO missions – International partnership, cooperation & global data sets EarlyEarly IRSIRS MultispectralMultispectral SensorsSensors • 1st Generation : IRS-1A, IRS-1B •
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Aperture Radar
    Synthetic Aperture Radar Subjects: Information Technology & Data Management Submitted by: Sung Wook Paek Definition SAR constellations Table of Contents [Hide] 1. Introduction Space-based radar observation has growing potentials for monitoring the global biospheric diversity subject to anthropogenic drivers at geological scales [1]. The performance of radar is less affected by weather and sunlight conditions than that of optical sensors. Satellites with onboard sensors can provide comprehensive coverage of remote areas or vast regions that may be too costly for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or ground-based platforms, provided that all platforms provide congruent results via calibrations [2][3][4]. Therefore, it was Seasat, the first satellite dedicated to remote sensing of the Earth’s oceans, that carried the first synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and other radar instruments operable in space. Despite these advantages, miniaturization of radar-carrying satellites was rather slow compared to satellites carrying optical devices due to the lack of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) components as well as challenging design requirements for the satellite platform [5][6]. Representative use cases of space-based radar include altimetry, sounding, scatterometry, and so forth in the studies of land, cryosphere, and oceans. Biospheric monitoring is another useful application because radar has high sensitivity in detecting surface changes in a target area and discriminating mobile targets against a background [7]. This paper will consider mainly SAR because of its three-dimensional mapping capability through interferometry. The heritage of Seasat has influenced many of later SAR missions for decades, as listed in Table 1 [8][9][10][11][12][13]; for instance, Shuttle Image Radar (SIR) missions used spare parts of the previous Seasat mission onboard Space Shuttles to test SAR image applications in land use, geology, hydrology, and forestry [14][15].
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Nano/Microsatellite Market Forecast, 9Th Edition
    2019 NANO/MICROSATELLITE MARKET FORECAST, 9TH EDITION Copyright 2018, SpaceWorks Enterprises, Inc. (SEI) APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. SPACEWORKS ENTERPRISES, INC., COPYRIGHT 2018. 1 Since 2008, SpaceWorks has actively monitored companies and economic activity across both the satellite and launch sectors 0 - 50 kg 50 - 250kg 250 - 1000kg 1000 - 2000kg 2000kg+ Custom market assessments are available for all mass classes NANO/MICROSATELLITE DEFINITION Picosatellite Nanosatellite Microsatellite Small/Medium Satellite (0.1 – 0.99 kg) (1 – 10 kg) (10 – 100 kg) (100 – 1000 kg) 0 kg 1 kg 10 kg 100 kg 1000 kg This report bounds the upper range of interest in microsatellites at 50 kg given the relatively large amount of satellite development activity in the 1 – 50 kg range FORECASTING METHODOLOGY SpaceWorks’ proprietary Launch Demand Database (LDDB) Downstream serves as the data source for all satellite market Demand assessments ▪ Planned The LDDB is a catalogue of over 10,000+ historical and Constellations future satellites containing both public and non-public (LDDB) satellite programs Launch Supply SpaceWorks newly updated Probabilistic Forecast Model (PFM) is used to generate future market potential SpaceWorks PFM Model ▪ The PFM considers down-stream demand, announced/planed satellite constellations, and supply-side dynamics, among other relevant factors Expert Analysis The team of expert industry analysts at SpaceWorks SpaceWorks further interprets and refines the PFM results to create Forecast accurate market forecasts Methodology at a Glance 2018 SpaceWorks forecasted 2018 nano/microsatellite launches with unprecedented accuracy – actual satellites launched amounted to just 5% below our analysts’ predictions. In line with SpaceWorks’ expectations, the industry corrected after a record launch year in 2017, sending 20% less nano/microsatellites to orbit than in 2018.
    [Show full text]