Witnessing the Apology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PHOTOGRAPHIC Essay Witnessing the Apology Juno gemes Photographer, Hawkesbury River I drove to Canberra alight with anticipation. ry, the more uncomfortable they became — not The stony-hearted policies of the past 11 years with me and this work I was committed to — but had been hard: seeing Indigenous organisations with themselves. I had long argued that every whose births I had witnessed being knee-capped, nation, including Australia, has a conflict history. taken over, mainstreamed; the painful ‘histori- Knowing can be painful, though not as painful as cal denialism’ (Manne 2008:27). Those gains memory itself. lost at the behest of Howard’s basically assimila- En route to Canberra, I stopped in Berrima tionist agenda. Yet my exhibition Proof: Portraits — since my schooldays, a weathervane of the from the Movement 1978–2003 toured around colonial mind. Here apprehension was evident. the country from the National Portrait Gallery in The woman working in a fine shop said to me, Canberra in 2003 to 11 venues across four States ‘I don’t know about this Apology’. She recounted and two countries, finishing up at the Museum of how her husband’s grandfather had fallen in love Sydney in 2008, and proved to be a rallying point with an Aboriginal woman and been turfed out for those for whom the Reconciliation agenda of his family in disgrace. Pain shadowed so many would never go away. For those growing pockets hearts in how many families across the nation? of resistance that could not be extinguished. ‘You might discover something for you in this’, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s new Labor Gov- I replied. ‘You’re such a nice woman’, she replied ernment prioritised the delivery of the Apology as in the patronising language of artificial courtesy. its first act in office at the beginning of the new She meant no harm, really; it’s just that she had parliament. Rudd and Jenny Macklin (Minister thought this way for so long. Inflicted shame and for Families, Housing, Community Services personal regret create their own scars. and Indigenous Affairs) had began consulting Arriving in Canberra I went straight to Indigenous groups on the precise wording of the Parliament House to sort out the paperwork for Apology immediately they gained office. I thought my press pass. I had received letters of commis- that the nation was now approaching a turning sion to photograph for a swag of fine publications. point. The questions were ‘Would the Apology There were only ten photographers permitted to be adequately expressed?’ and ‘How would it be be present in the parliament when Kevin Rudd received?’ All the power of language and clear delivered the Apology; I was one of them. Later sight were now called into service. I went with my assistant, Robert, to check in with Some years ago I turned to Indigenous friends the Aboriginal Tent Embassy. A neat embank- and asked, ‘Do you think you will ever be able to ment of many tents was assembled, Benny Zabble’s get past the anger and the pain?’ It seemed at that Rainbow Chi Tent supplied free food — accept- time an outrageous question. Their eyes widened: ing donations, as he has done for so many years. ‘I don’t know.’ The more that non-Indigenous A media tent and a meeting tent had been friends discovered about this nation’s real histo- erected. As always, the Sacred Fire was alight and Australian Aboriginal Studies 2008/1 11 Witnessing the Apology Gemes smouldering, now in the late afternoon light. In of the Racial Discrimination Act be accepta- the meeting tent Isabel Coe spoke out in anger. ble to anyone? Speaker after speaker argued the She spoke the same rhetoric I had been hearing same concerns. Would these community work- since Kevin Gilbert committed the embassy to its ers, whose voices were raised here, be heard in central goal 30 years ago, calling for the recog- the parliament — would they be consulted on the nition of Aboriginal sovereignty. Would people way ahead? Buses from all over the country had here be open to what was about to take place? I brought members of the Stolen Generations to be greeted old friends, we swapped news. It became present for this historic event. As always, there immediately clear that I was not the only one were non-Indigenous supporters who had come present holding out hope towards the events of because they felt they had to be there, each with the coming days. Tolerance, as always, prevailed. their desire to support Indigenous peoples and to Everyone always has a right to speak their point be present for this seminal moment in our shared of view at the embassy. histories. For the following day, Rudd and Macklin had On the morning of 13 February we arrived at invited guests to the first Welcome to Country in the parliament early to collect our press passes. the history of the Parliament of Australia, now We carted our camera gear and equipment to the on the eve of its 42nd sitting. In the Great Hall media room. We ten photographers were given Indigenous guests sat with Members of Parliament our final instructions: during the delivery of the (MPs) and their families to hear Matilda House, Apology we could photograph through spaces in adorned in a regal possum-skin cloak, welcome all the back wall of the gallery. When people rose assembled onto Ngunnawal lands. It was a joyous to applaud, two by two we could race forward affair, with dancers from the Torres Straight to photograph from the steps of the front row of Islands and elsewhere, choreographed by Marilyn the galleries. We were under instruction from the Miller. Speeches in reply to Matilda House were Keepers of the Rod. One bad move and you’re delivered by the Prime Minister and the Leader out, we were told. Mervyn Bishop and I winked of the Opposition, Brendan Nelson. Bob Brown at each other from behind our cameras. and Theresa Rein sat with MPs in the front row To a hushed and attentive house, the Prime on one side. Indigenous Elders and guests sat on Minister rose to deliver the Apology. As he read, the other. ‘Why had this respectful and pleasant sadness and regret surrounded all of us. Some event never happened in the parliament before?’ people sobbed quietly in the gallery. Where ever was the unspoken question of that morning. I looked through my lens, familiar faces were At the Tent Embassy over 1000 people had sombre, sad. Eyes were focused inwards through- assembled to march to the parliament. A stage out the galleries and in the House. No one moved had been set up and chairs for the elderly provid- at all, so intense was the attention to every word ed on the grassy embankment. Even the police in now spoken by Kevin Rudd (2008) on behalf of the distance wore friendly faces. These consid- the government to each one of us, to the nation. erate and co-operative accommodations were The nation is demanding of its political lead- new, most welcome and, on reflection, slightly ership to take us forward. Decency, human amusing. How capricious human beings can be? decency, universal human decency, demands On the stage, Barbara Shaw from Alice Springs that the nation now step forward to right an announced that she and her family had raised historical wrong. That is what we are doing $40 000 to bring her countrymen and women in this place today… from the central lands to be present here, person- We, the parliaments of the nation, are ulti- ally to protest the Northern Territory intervention mately responsible, not those who gave effect laws now wrecking havoc in their communities. to our laws. And the problem lay with the Speaker after speaker affirmed that they felt humil- laws themselves. As has been said of settler iated at having their welfare payments indiscrimi- societies elsewhere, we are the bearers of nately quarantined. Back to ‘dog tags and rations’ many blessings from our ancestors; therefore days! They felt that their communities were being we must also be the bearer of their burdens as invaded, once again. How could the suspension well. 116 Australian Aboriginal Studies 2008/1 Gemes Witnessing the Apology Therefore, for our nation, the course of this opportunity to craft a new future for this action is clear…that is, to deal now with what great land: Australia. I commend the motion has become one of the darkest chapters in to the House. Australia’s history. In doing so, we are doing more than contending with the facts, the The House and its guests rose to their feet as evidence and the often rancorous public one. The applause was thunderous. We photogra- debate. In doing so, we are also wrestling phers raced into our positions. Both sides of the with our own soul. House now stood in support of the motion. In the This is not, as some would argue, a galleries arms now rose in applause, tear-stained black-armband view of history; it is just the faces everywhere gradually relaxed into some- truth: the cold, confronting, uncomfortable thing new, one by one, each in their own time. My truth — facing it, dealing with it, moving on eyes were on the gallery and on the people on the from it. Until we fully confront that truth, floor. How to frame the complex emotions of this there will always be a shadow hanging over moment without intrusion? Every second now us and our future as a fully united and fully was crucial.