DOCSLIB.ORG

375 Part 129—Operations: Foreign Air Carriers and Foreign Op- Erators of U.S.-Registered Aircraft Engaged in Com- Mon Carriage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
375 Part 129—Operations: Foreign Air Carriers and Foreign Op- Erators of U.S.-Registered Aircraft Engaged in Com- Mon Carriage Federal Aviation Administration, DOT § 129.1 17 For A318/A319/A320/A321 series airplanes, with IAE engines, resolution = 2.58%. 18 For all aircraft manufactured on or after December 6, 2010, the seconds per sampling interval is 0.125. Each input must be recorded at this rate. Alternately sampling inputs (interleaving) to meet this sampling interval is prohibited. 19 For all 737 model airplanes manufactured between August 19, 2000, and April 6, 2010: The seconds per sampling interval is 0.5 per control input; the remarks regarding the sampling rate do not apply; a single control wheel force transducer installed on the left cable control is acceptable provided the left and right control wheel positions also are recorded. [Doc. No. 28109, 62 FR 38390, July 17, 1997; 62 FR 48135, Sept. 12, 1997, as amended by Amdt. 125–32, 64 FR 46121, Aug. 24, 1999; 65 FR 2295, Jan. 14, 2000; Amdt. 125–32, 65 FR 2295, Jan. 14, 2000; Amdt. 125–34, 65 FR 51745, Aug. 24, 2000; 65 FR 81735, Dec. 27, 2000; Amdt. 125–39, 67 FR 54323, Aug. 21, 2002; Amdt. 125–42, 68 FR 42937, July 18, 2003; 68 FR 50069, Aug. 20, 2003; 68 FR 53877, Sept. 15, 2003; Amdt. 125–54, 73 FR 12568, Mar. 7, 2008; Amdt. 125–56, 73 FR 73180, Dec. 2, 2008; Amdt. 125–60, 75 FR 17046, Apr. 5, 2010; Amdt. 125–59, 75 FR 7357, Feb. 19, 2010; Amdt. 125– 62, 78 FR 39971, July 3, 2013] PART 129—OPERATIONS: FOREIGN 129.105 Aging airplane inspections and records reviews for U.S.- registered mul- AIR CARRIERS AND FOREIGN OP- tiengine aircraft. ERATORS OF U.S.-REGISTERED 129.107 Repairs assessment for pressurized AIRCRAFT ENGAGED IN COM- fuselages. MON CARRIAGE 129.109 Supplemental inspections for U.S.- registered aircraft. 129.111 Electrical wiring interconnection Sec. systems (EWIS) maintenance program. SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION NO. 129.113 Fuel tank system maintenance pro- 97 [NOTE] gram. 129.115 Limit of validity. Subpart A—General 129.117 Flammability reduction means. 129.1 Applicability and definitions. 129.5 Operations specifications. Subpart C—Special Federal Aviation 129.7 Application, issuance, or denial of op- Regulations erations specifications. 129.201 SFAR No. 111—Lavatory Oxygen 129.9 Contents of operations specifications. Systems. 129.11 Amendment, suspension and termi- APPENDIX A TO PART 129 [RESERVED] nation of operations specifications. 129.13 Airworthiness and registration cer- AUTHORITY: 49 U.S.C. 1372, 40113, 40119, tificates. 44101, 44701–44702, 44705, 44709–44711, 44713, 129.14 Maintenance program and minimum 44716–44717, 44722, 44901–44904, 44906, 44912, equipment list requirements for U.S.-reg- 46105, Pub. L. 107–71 sec. 104. istered aircraft. SOURCE: Docket No. 1994, 29 FR 1720, Feb. 5, 129.15 Flightcrew member certificates. 1964, unless otherwise noted. 129.17 Aircraft communication and naviga- tion equipment for operations under IFR SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION or over the top. NO. 97 129.18 Collision Avoidance System. 129.19 Air traffic rules and procedures. 129.20 Digital flight data recorders. EDITORIAL NOTE: For the text of SFAR No. 129.21 Control of traffic. 97, see part 91 of this chapter. 129.22 Communication and navigation equipment for rotorcraft operations Subpart A—General under VFR over routes navigated by pi- lotage. § 129.1 Applicability and definitions. 129.23 Transport category cargo service air- planes: Increased zero fuel and landing (a) Foreign air carrier operations in the weights. United States. This part prescribes rules 129.24 Cockpit voice recorders. governing the operation within the 129.25 Airplane security. United States of each foreign air car- 129.28 Flightdeck security. rier holding the following: 129.29 Smoking prohibitions. (1) A permit issued by the U.S. De- partment of Transportation under 49 Subpart B—Continued Airworthiness and U.S.C. 41301 through 41306, or Safety Improvements (2) Other appropriate economic or ex- 129.101 Purpose and definition. emption authority issued by the U.S. 129.103 [Reserved] Department of Transportation. 375 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:12 Feb 04, 2016 Jkt 238048 PO 00000 Frm 00385 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\14\14V3.TXT 31 lpowell on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB § 129.5 14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–16 Edition) (b) Operations of U.S.-registered air- States in common carriage without, or craft solely outside the United States. In in violation of, appropriate operations addition to the operations specified specifications. under paragraph (a) of this section, (e) Each foreign air carrier must keep §§ 129.5, 129.7, 129.9, 129.11, 129.14, 129.20 each of its employees and other persons and 129.24, and subpart B of this part used in its operations informed of the also apply to operations of U.S.-reg- provisions of its operations specifica- istered aircraft operated solely outside tions that apply to that employee’s or the United States in common carriage person’s duties and responsibilities. by a foreign person or foreign air car- (f) Operations specifications issued rier. under this part are effective until— (c) Definitions. For the purpose of this (1) The foreign air carrier or foreign part— person surrenders them to the FAA; (1) Foreign person means any person (2) The Administrator suspends or who is not a citizen of the United terminates the operations specifica- States and who operates a U.S.-reg- tions; or istered aircraft in common carriage (3) The operations specifications are solely outside the United States. amended as provided in § 129.11. (2) Years in service means the calendar (g) Within 30 days after a foreign air time elapsed since an aircraft was carrier or foreign person terminates issued its first U.S. or first foreign air- operations under part 129 of this sub- worthiness certificate. chapter, the operations specifications [Doc. No. FAA–1999–5401, 67 FR 72762, Dec. 6, must be surrendered by the foreign air 2002, as amended by Amdt. 129–43, 72 FR carrier or foreign person to the respon- 63413, Nov. 8, 2007; Amdt. 129–45, 73 FR 12570, sible Flight Standards District Office. Mar. 7, 2008; Amdt. 129–45, 74 FR 32801, July (h) No person operating under this 9, 2009; Amdt. 129–49, 76 FR 7489, Feb. 10, 2011] part may operate or list on its oper- ations specifications any airplane list- § 129.5 Operations specifications. ed on operations specifications issued (a) Each foreign air carrier con- under part 125 of this chapter. ducting operations within the United States, and each foreign air carrier or [Doc. No. FAA–2009–0140; 76 FR 7489, Feb. 10, foreign person operating U.S.-reg- 2011] istered aircraft solely outside the § 129.7 Application, issuance, or denial United States in common carriage of operations specifications. must conduct its operations in accord- ance with operations specifications (a) A foreign air carrier or foreign issued by the Administrator under this person applying to the FAA for oper- part. ations specifications under this part (b) Each foreign air carrier con- must submit an application— ducting operations within the United (1) In a form and manner prescribed States must conduct its operations in by the Administrator; and accordance with the Standards con- (2) At least 90 days before the in- tained in Annex 1 (Personnel Licens- tended date of operation. ing), Annex 6 (Operation of Aircraft), (b) An authorized officer or employee Part I (International Commercial Air of the applicant, having knowledge of Transport—Aeroplanes) or Part III the matters stated in the application, (International Operations—Heli- must sign the application and certify copters), as appropriate, and in Annex 8 in writing that the statements in the (Airworthiness of Aircraft) to the Con- application are true. The application vention on International Civil Avia- must include two copies of the appro- tion. priate written authority issued to that (c) No foreign air carrier may operate officer or employee by the applicant. to or from locations within the United (c) A foreign applicant may be issued States without, or in violation of, ap- operations specifications, if after re- propriate operations specifications. view, the Administrator finds the ap- (d) No foreign air carrier or foreign plicant— person shall operate U.S.-registered (1) Meets the applicable requirements aircraft solely outside the United of this part; 376 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:12 Feb 04, 2016 Jkt 238048 PO 00000 Frm 00386 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\14\14V3.TXT 31 lpowell on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB Federal Aviation Administration, DOT § 129.11 (2) Holds the economic or exemption istered aircraft solely outside the authority required by the Department United States in common carriage in of Transportation, applicable to the op- accordance with § 129.1(b) shall in- erations to be conducted; clude— (3) Complies with the applicable secu- (1) The specific location and mailing rity requirements of 49 CFR chapter address of the principal place of busi- XII; ness in the State of the Operator and, (4) Is properly and adequately if different, the address that will serve equipped to conduct the operations de- as the primary point of contact for cor- scribed in the operations specifica- respondence between the FAA and the tions; and foreign air carrier or foreign person; (5) Holds a valid air operator certifi- (2) Within 1 year after February 10, cate issued by the State of the Oper- 2011, the designation of an agent for ator. service within the United States, in- (d) An application may be denied if cluding the agent’s full name and office the Administrator finds that the appli- address or usual place of residence; cant is not properly or adequately (3) In the case of a foreign air carrier, equipped to conduct the operations to the certificate number and validity of be described in the operations speci- the foreign air carrier’s Air Operator fications.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NTSB-AAR-72-18 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD Title PAGE
    SA-424 FILE NO. 1-0002 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT WESTERN AIR LINES, INC. BOEING 720-047B,N3166 ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA MARCH 31, 1971 ADOPTED: JUNE 7, 1972 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, 0. C. 20591 REPORT NUMBER: NTSB-AAR-72-18 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TiTLE PAGE . Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB-AAR-72-18 I. Title and Subtitle 5.Report Date Aircraft Accident Report - Western Air Lines, InC., Sune 7, 1972 Roeing 720-047B, N3166, Ontario International Airport, 6.Performing Organization Ontario. California, March 31, 1971 Code '. Author(s) 8.Performing Organization Report No. I. Performing Organization Name and Address IO.Work Unit No. Bureau of Aviation Safety 11 .Contract or Grant No. National Transportation Safety Board Washington, D. C. 20591 13.Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Aircraft Accident Report March 31, 1971 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, 0. C. 20591 14.Sponsoring Agency Code 15.Supplementary Notes I6.Abstract Flight 366, a Boeing 720B, on a proficiency check flight, yawed and rolled out of control, and crashed while in the process of executing a 3-engine missed- approach from a simulated engine-out ILS instrument approach. The five crew- members and only occupants died in the crash. The weather conditions at Ontario were 600 feet overcast, with 3/4-mile visibility in fog, haze, and smoke. The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the failure of the aircraft rudder hydraulic actuator support fitting. The failure of the fitting resulted in the inapparent loss Of left rudder control which, under the conditions of this flight, precluded the pilotk ability to maintain directional control during a simlated engine-out missed- approach.
    [Show full text]
  • B-162897 Aircraft Owned Or Leased By
    Dear Mr, Thompson: Reference is made to your letter of February 10, 1970, requesting that we update information which we furnished to you in a report dated March 4, 1968, relative to aircraft owned or leased by the Federal Avia- 1 tion Administration (FAA). In accordance with this request, we are fur- nishing you the following information. 1. Inventory of active aircraft owned as of June 30, 1967, 1968, 1969, and January 1, 1970 (enclosure I). 2. Installed passenger capacity and cost of aircraft owned as of June 30, 1967, and January 1, 1970 (enclosure II). 3. Aircraft leased or on loan during the period July 1, 1967, through June 30, 1969 (enclosure III). 4. Aircraft mazntenance, maJor overhaul, and modification costs by aircraft type, for fiscal years 1968 and 1969 (enclosure IV). 5. Average cost per flxght hour by aircraft type, fiscal years 1968 and 1969 (enclosure V>. 6. Aircraft utilization by aircraft type and maJor cate- gories, fiscal years 1968 and 1969 (enclosure VI). 7. Utilization and cost of open market rental aircraft, fiscal years 1968 and 1969 (enclosure VII). In addition, you requested that we advise you of the progress that has been made in establishing a uniform maintenance and operating cost re- porting system for all FAA owned and leased aircraft. As shown zn our March 4, 1968, report, FhCl had 101 aircraft which cost approximately $46 mzlllon 1n its inventory of active aircraft as of June 30, 1967. On January 1, 1970, the number of active air craft had decreased Co 98; however, the cost of the aircraft in the inventory was approximately $52 million, This increase was the net result of.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Aviation and Space Museum
    CANADA AVIATION AND SPACE MUSEUM BOEING MODEL 720B PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA FLYING EXPERIMENTAL TEST BED REGISTRATION C-FETB Introduction The practical era of jet-age passenger transport aircraft officially dawned when the British de Havilland Company D.H.106 Comet made its premiere flight to great acclaim from the Hatfield, Hertfordshire aerodrome in England on 27 July 1949. Catering to British and mid to long-range routes to European, Middle Eastern and overseas destinations, the Comet series of airliners carried their passengers aloft in luxurious opulence for more than twenty years. Military and test derivatives followed suit and these continued flying for many decades, including two Comets for the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF). Just 14 days later, across the vast Atlantic Ocean, in the small town of Malton, Ontario, Canada, a new aviation company called Avro Canada successfully accomplished the same task with much less fanfare and accolades. Avro sent its small, medium-range, turbo-jet transport, called the C-102 Jetliner, aloft for its first flight, inaugurating the dreamed potential for such a unique travel experience for the public on the North American continent. United States Air Force personnel found the aircraft favourable when they tried it out on flights at Wright Field, Ohio in March 1951. However, this Canadian dream didn’t last for long. The modestly successful Comet-series didn’t shine as brightly as its popular name when a series of tragic, fatal accidents to production civil aircraft nearly snuffed out its very existence. Following design rectification’s, the Royal Air Force continued to employ Comets in versatile roles, such as modifying the design into the Nimrod.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Consumption Fc (SFC) PERFORMANCE of CIVIL AIRCRAFTS in 1960S
    Inspired by Physics – Just How Big is Disruptive? Design a FlyingJumbo Jet in Just One Hour ESADE Executive Program, Markus Nordberg November 15, 2017 Development & Innovation Unit (CERN) WHY ARE WE DOING THIS EXERCISE? • Like the experiments at CERN, the aerodynamic design of aircraft are also much determined by the was of physics • We wish to give an example of physics-driven experimentation process, requiring cross-disciplinary collaboration • Here, we wish to bring in business management, engineering and design • They all contribute, even if emphasis is here on aerodynamics • Prototyping is a good way to start to learn about the design process (even if incremental) • If I am able to design a stupid jumbo, well, then I can …. • Physics and Design Thinking is Fun PLEASE REMEMBER THAT … • … Modern aircraft designers are not taught like this • (The difference between this intro and designing real airliners is only about 10 000 hours … But make no mistake, our jumbo will fly) • … Modern aircrafts are not designed by beginners • … You will not be a certified aircraft designer after this course • … Folks at CERN can’t do anything • (Alas - but they do know how far the laws of physics will take you) WHO DESIGNED THIS? OR THIS? NATURE SEEMS TO KNOW ITS SHAPES WELL ALL YOU NEED TODAY TO KNOW ABOUT FLYING Finesse F = L/D Aspect Ratio Ar = b²/S b S Shape (F) Performance (engines) codecogs Well, Almost … F = ma or, in terms of pressure (assuming air ~ fluid) W/S ~ 0.3 x σ x v² Where: W = weight of the object (N) S = wing area (m²) σ = density of
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport
    The History of Air Transport KOSTAS IATROU Dedicated to my wife Evgenia and my sons George and Yianni Copyright © 2020: Kostas Iatrou First Edition: July 2020 Published by: Hermes – Air Transport Organisation Graphic Design – Layout: Sophia Darviris Material (either in whole or in part) from this publication may not be published, photocopied, rewritten, transferred through any electronical or other means, without prior permission by the publisher. Preface ommercial aviation recently celebrated its first centennial. Over the more than 100 years since the first Ctake off, aviation has witnessed challenges and changes that have made it a critical component of mod- ern societies. Most importantly, air transport brings humans closer together, promoting peace and harmo- ny through connectivity and social exchange. A key role for Hermes Air Transport Organisation is to contribute to the development, progress and promo- tion of air transport at the global level. This would not be possible without knowing the history and evolu- tion of the industry. Once a luxury service, affordable to only a few, aviation has evolved to become accessible to billions of peo- ple. But how did this evolution occur? This book provides an updated timeline of the key moments of air transport. It is based on the first aviation history book Hermes published in 2014 in partnership with ICAO, ACI, CANSO & IATA. I would like to express my appreciation to Professor Martin Dresner, Chair of the Hermes Report Committee, for his important role in editing the contents of the book. I would also like to thank Hermes members and partners who have helped to make Hermes a key organisa- tion in the air transport field.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Travel, Life-Style, Energy Use and Environmental Impact
    Air travel, life-style, energy use and environmental impact Stefan Kruger Nielsen Ph.D. dissertation September 2001 Financed by the Danish Energy Agency’s Energy Research Programme Department of Civil Engineering Technical University of Denmark Building 118 DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby Denmark http://www.bvg.dtu.dk 2001 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document Report BYG DTU R-021 2001 ISSN 1601-2917 ISBN 87-7877-076-9 Executive summary This summary describes the results of a Ph.D. study that was carried out in the Energy Planning Group, Department for Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, in a three-year period starting in August 1998 and ending in September 2001. The project was funded by a research grant from the Danish Energy Research Programme. The overall aim of this project is to investigate the linkages between energy use, life style and environmental impact. As a case of study, this report investigates the future possibilities for reducing the growth in greenhouse gas emissions from commercial civil air transport, that is passenger air travel and airfreight. The reason for this choice of focus is that we found that commercial civil air transport may become a relatively large energy consumer and greenhouse gas emitter in the future. For example, according to different scenarios presented by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), commercial civil air transport's fuel burn may grow by between 0,8 percent a factor of 1,6 and 16 between 1990 and 2050. The actual growth in fuel consumption will depend on the future growth in airborne passenger travel and freight and the improvement rate for the specific fuel efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Propulsive-Only Flight Control Problem
    NASA-CR-202408 The Propulsive-Only Flight Control Problem by Daniel J. Biezad Cal Poly State University San Luis Oblspo, CA 93407 Abstract aircraft remained controllable in-flightby the skillful application of thrust, but the extreme difficulty of this Attitude control of aircraft using only the task, combined with the stress of the emergency, did throttles is investigated The long time constants of not allow a successful landing. both the engines and of the aJmraft dynamics, The fundamental problem is that an alrcratt together with the coupling between longitudinal and cannot be easily and predictably maneuvered by the lateral aircraft modes, make piloted flightwith failed pilot with the throttles alone. Although the control control surfaces hazardous, especially when power is often sufficient to fly the aircraft, the long time attempting to land. This research documents the constants and couplings between dynamic modes results of in-flight operation using simulated failed make pilot control uncertain and precarious for flight controls and ground simulations of piloted demanding tasks such as landing. Exposure to these propulsive-only control to touchdown. Augmentation situations in training simulations may alleviate the control laws to assist the pilot are described using gross misapplication of throttles, but will not eliminate both optimal contre_ and classical feedback methods. the potential for a serious accident to occur. Piloted simulation using augmentation shows that A complimentary solutionto more training simple and effective augmented control can be would be the addition of a simple, low cost pilot-assist achieved in a wide variety of lailed configurations. mode to be activated by the pilot in the event of complete failure of the high bandwidth pitch and roll Nomenclature controls.
    [Show full text]
  • Fsd Mar93.Pdf
    During Adverse Conditions, Decelerating to Stop Demands More from Crew and Aircraft Hydroplaning, gusting cross winds and mechanical failures are only a few of the factors that contribute to runway overrun accidents and incidents after landing or rejecting a takeoff. Improvements in tire design, runway construction and aircraft systems reduce risks, but crew training remains the most important tool to stop safely. by Jack L. King Aviation Consultant Decelerating an aircraft to a stop on a runway traction during wet-weather operations and can become significantly more critical in ad- the use of anti-skid braking devices, coupled verse conditions, such as heavy rain in mar- with high-pressure tires, has reduced greatly ginal visibility with gusting cross winds. Add the risk of hydroplaning. Still, accident and the surprise of a malfunction, which requires incident statistics confirm that several major a high-speed rejected takeoff (RTO) or a con- runway overrun accidents each year are caused trolled stop after a touchdown on a slightly by unsuccessful braking involving either a high- flooded runway, and a flight crew is challenged speed landing or an RTO on a wet runway to prevent an off-runway excursion. surface; the factors involved in decelerating to a controlled stop are very similar in these Research findings and technological advances two situations. in recent years have helped alleviate, but not eliminate, the hazards associated with takeoff Overrun Accidents and landing in adverse weather. The U.S. Na- tional Aeronautics and Space Administration Continue to Occur (NASA) and the U.S. Federal Aviation Admin- istration (FAA) conducted specialized tests on A recent Boeing Company study reported that tire spin-up speeds after touchdown rather than during 30 years of jet transport service there spin-down speeds in rollout that confirm that have been 48 runway overrun accidents with hydroplaning occurs at substantially lower more than 400 fatalities resulting from RTOs speeds than noted previously.
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing History Chronology Boeing Red Barn
    Boeing History Chronology Boeing Red Barn PRE-1910 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Boeing History Chronology PRE-1910 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 PRE -1910 1910 Los Angeles International Air Meet Museum of Flight Collection HOME PRE-1910 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1881 Oct. 1 William Edward Boeing is born in Detroit, Michigan. 1892 April 6 Donald Wills Douglas is born in Brooklyn, New York. 1895 May 8 James Howard “Dutch” Kindelberger is born in Wheeling, West Virginia. 1898 Oct. 26 Lloyd Carlton Stearman is born in Wellsford, Kansas. 1899 April 9 James Smith McDonnell is born in Denver, Colorado. 1903 Dec. 17 Wilbur and Orville Wright make the first successful powered, manned flight in Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. 1905 Dec. 24 Howard Robard Hughes Jr. is born in Houston, Texas. 1907 Jan. 28 Elrey Borge Jeppesen is born in Lake Charles, Louisiana. HOME PRE-1910 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1910 s Boeing Model 1 B & W seaplane HOME PRE-1910 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1910 January Timber baron William E. Boeing attends the first Los Angeles International Air Meet and develops a passion for aviation. March 10 William Boeing buys yacht customer Edward Heath’s shipyard on the Duwamish River in Seattle. The facility will later become his first airplane factory. 1914 May Donald W. Douglas obtains his Bachelor of Science degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), finishing the four-year course in only two years.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.546,280 B1 Ershov (45) Date of Patent: *Jun
    USOO754628OB1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.546,280 B1 Ershov (45) Date of Patent: *Jun. 9, 2009 (54) USE OF NEURAL NETWORKS FOR 5,819,245 A * 10/1998 Peterson et al. ............... TO6, 16 KEYWORD GENERATION 6,304.864 B1* 10/2001 Liddy et al. ................... TO6.15 (75) Inventor: Alexander V. Ershov, Sergiev Posad (RU) (Continued) OTHER PUBLICATIONS (73) Assignee: Quintura, Inc., Alexandria, VA (US) "Inhibitory connections in the assembly neural network for texture (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this segmentation'. A. Goltsev, Donald C. Wunsch, Neural Networks, patent is extended or adjusteds under 35 WO 1. 11, No.O. 5, Jul. 1998, pppp. 951-962.* U.S.C. 154(b) by 379 days. (Continued) is- Primary Examiner David R Vincent This patent is Subject to a terminal dis Assistant Examiner Mai T Tran Ca10. (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm Bardmesser Law Group (22) Filed: Sep. 27, 2006 A system for identifying keywords in search results includes Related U.S. Application Data a plurality of neurons connected as a neural network, the (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/468,692. neurons being associated with words and documents . An activity regulator regulates a minimum and/or maximum filed on Aug. 30, 2005, now Pat. No. 7,475,072. number of neurons of the neural network that are excited at (60) Provisional application No. 60/735,858, filed on Nov. any given time. Means for displaying the neurons to a user 14, 2005, provisional application No. 60/722,412, and identifying the neurons that correspond to keywords can filed on Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Lossoflicensebrochureenglish.Pdf
    Unexpected illness or injury can pose many problems for Pilots. GBG’s Loss of License Insurance provides peace of mind with a comprehensive package made to suit your individual needs. • Annual plan that follows pilots worldwide • Maximum benefit amount of USD$500,000 • Covers pilots of commercial airliners and business jets, plus other types of business aircraft including twinjets, corporate helicopters and air taxis • Flexibility of covering both temporary and permanent disabilities • Coverage for For Pilots and First Officers that hold a Commercial Pilots License or an Air Transport License • Sickness and/or Bodily injury Benefits: Eligibility up to age 60 • Upon attainment of age 60, benefits for “accident only” coverage continue up to the sooner of retirement age or age 65. Schedule Of Benefits BENEFIT PLAN BENEFIT MAXIMUM Permanent Total Disablement by A 100% of the Sum Insured Bodily Injury or Sickness Permanent Total Disablement by B 25% of the Sum Insured Classified Illness or Psychological Illness Temporary Total Disablement by C 2% of the Sum Insured per month* Bodily Injury or Sickness Temporary Total Disablement by D 0.5% of the Sum Insured per month* Classified Illness or Psychological Illness *TTD monthly payment not to exceed 75% of monthly salary. Payments made on Temporary Total Disablement will erode the Permanent Total Disablement sum insured. One payment of 100% of the Sum Insured shall exhaust the Sum Insured per Insured Person. In the event the Insured Person holds more than one License, all Licenses must be cancelled for a claim to be considered. Permanent Total Disablement means the Insured Person is totally unable to perform the essential duties of their own previous occupation as a license holder, and which lasts 180 days and at the end of that period is beyond hope of improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • On Time. Every Time. Airbus Thsa Overhaul|Exchange Boeing Hsta Overhaul
    Leading Manufacturer and FAA/Repair Station For Commercial and Military Aircraft Actuation Systems ON TIME. EVERY TIME. AIRBUS THSA OVERHAUL|EXCHANGE BOEING HSTA OVERHAUL|EXCHANGE BOEING HSTA AND AIRBUS THSA OVERHAUL AND FORWARD EXCHANGES AVAILABLE AIRBUSAIRBUS Why pay more from the OEM when you can get quality service at a competitive price? As a leading FAA, EASA, and CAAC certified Repair Station, Skytronics, Inc. provides complete repair and exchange services for Airbus Trimmable Horizontal AIRBUS MODELS Stabilizer Actuators (THSAs). Model P/N EASA and FAA Airworthiness Directives (AD) and Airbus A300 47142 Series Airbus Service Bulletins (SB) require repetitive Airbus A300-600 47142 Series detailed inspections of the THSA for continued Airbus A310 47142 Series airworthiness. You can rely on Skytronics for Airbus A318 47145 Series inspection, test, repair and overhaul requirements Airbus A319 47145 Series with SAME DAY forward exchange service to Airbus A320 47145 Series avoid AOGs. Airbus A321 47145 Series Airbus A330/A340 47147 Series Airbus A330 47172 Series Airbus A340 47175 Series ON TIME. EVERY TIME. SKYTRONICS SPECIALIZES IN THE FOLLOWING: • Test and Repairs • Hydraulic Motor Test, Repairs, • Overhauls & Exchange Units Overhauls and Replacements • Ball Screw Assembly, Screw Shafts, Ballnut Test, • Hydraulic Brake Test, Repairs, Repairs, Overhauls and Replacements. Overhauls and Replacements State-of-the-Art In-House Ball Screw Overhaul and Testing Capabilities Skytronics, established in 1956, is an FAA, EASA and CAAC certified repair station committed to providing superior repair and overhaul services that enhance the safety and operational performance of your fleet. We maintain an extensive inventory and have the fastest turn-time in the business.
    [Show full text]