Kiwirail Holdings Limited 106919

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kiwirail Holdings Limited 106919 BACKGROUND KiwiRail Holdings limited “KiwiRail” is the State Owned Enterprise responsible for the management and operation of the national rail network. This includes managing the national rail infrastructure and land as well as rail freight and passenger logistics within New Zealand. KiwiRail is also the Requiring Authority for land designated for “Railway Purposes” in District Plans throughout New Zealand. There are two rail lines within Hamilton City Council’s jurisdiction; the North Island Main Trunk Line and the East Coast Main Trunk Line. The North Island Main Trunk (NMIT) extends through the city in a north to south direction and is the primary rail spine for the entire North Island. The East Coast Main Trunk (EMCT) branches from the North Island Main Trunk at the Hamilton Railway Station, and heads east out of the city through the suburb of Ruakura. It provides the only rail access from the Bay of Plenty and Port of Tauranga to the North Island Main Trunk. The NIMT provides a rail freight and passenger link between Wellington and Auckland, while the ECMT provides a freight link between Hamilton and the Bay of Plenty, including the Port of Tauranga and the proposed Ruakura logistics hub. These lines are key strategic freight routes and as such are an important part of the KiwiRail network. SUBMISSION KiwiRail supports the development of a Regional and Golden Triangle Inter Modal Terminal (IMP) and the broad strategic direction on land and transport management set out in the Proposed Ruakura Plan Change. 2 We have liaised briefly with NZTA and AT on matters of mutual interest and our submissions also raise and/or addresses similar matters. KiwiRail’s submission on the Proposed Plan Change for the Ruakura Development covers: x Uncertainty regarding the growth of rail traffic to and from the Inland Port x Absence of rail freight modelling x Level crossings x Double tracking the ECMT at Ruakura x Proposed and long-term rail freight projects within the Auckland Metro area x Assumptions for qualitatively assessing the impacts on rail from the development x Qualitative assessment of impacts on rail (by line, for low, medium and high growth) x Relationship with the rail corridor x Plan change provisions. INLAND PORT RAIL GROWTH UNCERTAINTY KiwiRail looks forward to partnering with the Inland Port development to help deliver its success, and bring the benefits of rail to this important venture. KiwiRail is very competitive in this market and once the rail siding is in place, we will actively pursue a high market share. However, KiwiRail cannot at this stage know how successful the Inland Port will be or how much of the contestable freight market it will win. Furthermore, although KiwiRail will pursue a high market share, for the purpose of commenting on the proposed plan change, we only speculate as to how much of the Inland Port’s throughput will be handled by rail. Reinforcing this point, there appears to be no forecasting as to how rail traffic though the Inland Port might grow. Therefore we can only assess the impacts qualitatively. KiwiRail is not aware of any regional transport model that attempts to model rail freight movements (unlike urban passenger rail, which is an integral part of the Auckland and 3 Wellington models). We consider that some analysis would be beneficial to provide an indication of proposed freight growth to assist with certainty of staging the development and foreshadowing rail infrastructure requirements across the region and wider Golden Triangle. We note that NZTA has concerns in respect of the earlier release of land for development prior to the Waikato expressway being built. Decision requested: 1. Analysis and an indicative forecast (time series) of how rail traffic (tonnage or TEUs – 20 foot equivalent units) though the Inland Port is likely to grow. GRADE SEPARATED RAIL CROSSINGS The intensification of land use development/subdivision adjoining the EMCTL creates increased traffic movements that affect rail level crossing safety. The proposal seeks to create a new rail crossing point at Spine Road. KiwiRail would not support any at grade level crossings between Ruakura Lane and Telephone Road (SH 1B) once the Waikato Expressway is in place at Ruakura. That is, Percival Road Level Crossing is removed (as the Inland Port will build over it), and no new level crossings are installed. The cost of the grade separated rail crossing and who will pay has not been addressed as part of the Plan Change application. The matter is critical to the formation of the Spine Road link with the IMT and provision of North/South connectivity, and the staging of the Knowledge Area. Is this to be funded by the Hamilton City Council or by Tainui Group Holdings Limited and Chedworth Properties Limited? 4 Any new grade separated rail crossings would be expected to meet the current design criteria and envelopes of the rail access provider. The design and formation of the grade separated crossing will need to be provided to KiwiRail for assessment. We note the potential timing issues with staging the construction of the Spine Road, the closure of Percival rail level crossing, and relocation of Ruakura Road. These matters need to be worked through and resolved with KiwiRail and other relevant authorities as part of this Plan Change. Decision requested: 1. The provision of grade separated rail crossings only 2. Confirmation that Spine Road rail crossing access is to be grade separated. 3. Confirmation that the overbridge design has provision for the Inland Port siding 4. Consultation and agreement with KiwiRail on the design and layout of grade separated rail crossings, the staging of this, and closure of Percival Road Level Crossing and reinstatement. RELATIONSHIP WITH THE RAIL CORRIDOR Double Tracking The ECMT at Ruakura The development straddles the ECMT, one of New Zealand’s most strategically important lines. We believe that a condition for any approval should include a requirement for Tainui Group Holdings Limited and Chedworth Properties Limited to work with KiwiRail on all design elements. For example, the design of grade separated rail crossings should be consistent with the corridor provisions used for the Hamilton Ring Road crossing of the ECMT (Bridge 11). 5 KiwiRail wishes to preserve the option to at least double track through all of Hamilton east towards Morrinsville, including through the Ruakura development. Ultimately KiwiRail may need to double track the majority of the ECMT between Hamilton and Tauranga, although sections where it will be extremely expensive to double track are likely to remain single track for the foreseeable future (i.e. the Kaimai Tunnel and the Waikato River Bridge). Decision requested: 1. Confirmation that the rail corridor is wide enough for double tracking 2. Consultation and agreement with KiwiRail on the design and layout of the IMT, rail siding and loop throughout the staged development to integrate with the rail corridor and to ensure the corridor maintains its physical and operational capacity while providing sufficient flexibility for rail line enhancement. PROPOSED RAIL FREIGHT PROJECTS IN AUCKLAND METRO As mentioned above, KiwiRail looks forward to partnering with the Inland Port development to help deliver its success. We are however, mindful of the wider impacts from the development on rail capacity in the Golden Triangle. KiwiRail has substantially increased rail capacity between Hamilton and Tauranga in recent years, and we anticipate that only minor capacity improvements will be required over the medium term. In contrast, additional capacity within the Auckland Metro area is very likely to be needed in the next five years. The top priority to deliver a step change in capacity is to provide triple track between Westfield and Wiri. The timing of that project is set out in the following extract from KiwiRail’s Infrastructure and Engineering Business Plan FY14-16 (Section 7.1.1, Page 88): The business plan assumes that the third main will be built between Westfield and Wiri within 5 years. Timing for that construction will depend on negotiations between AT and KRG on funding contributions and access rights. 6 rather than as the primary use. This provides a level of uncertainty as to the proposed and ultimate use, and consequently impacts on the transport network. While KiwiRail fully supports the IMT, the proposed logistics hub or similar activity is also considered to be an appropriate use adjoining the rail corridor, given the potential sensitivities of other land uses (primarily residential) to 24/7 operation of the rail network, in particular the potential effects of noise and vibration. Zoning Adjoining the Rail Corridor Rail forms a key part of the region’s significant land transport infrastructure. KiwiRail seeks to protect our ability to operate, maintain and enhance the national rail network in the future. To achieve this, we seek to ensure that District Plans encourage adjoining land uses that do not compromise the ability to operate a safe and efficient rail network both day and night. Where sensitive activities are proposed on land adjoining the railway, appropriate controls should be imposed to ensure their long term amenity. Similarly it is appropriate that the District Plan provides controls that promote the safe and efficient operation of the region’s significant land transport networks including the railway. Noise sensitive development located near existing or planned infrastructure, can result in conflicts between land uses and may impact on the operation, maintenance and upgrading of infrastructure necessary to support sustainable growth of the region Decision requested: 1. Provision of appropriate zones and activities that adjoining the rail corridor; and avoidance of residential zones and noise sensitive activities adjoining the rail corridor. 2. Appropriate controls where zones and noise sensitive activities re proposed 10 PLAN CHANGE PROVISIONS Objectives and Policies - 25H.4 Objective 25H.4.16 refers to the importance of network utilities but provides no policy to manage adverse effects of subdivision use and development or noise sensitive activities on the nationally and regionally significant rail network.
Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Overview ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Key Findings – Markets and Visitor Hubs ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Key Findings – Additional Factors to Drive Visitor Growth ............................................................................... 3 1.4. Key Findings – Financial Results ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.5. Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.6. Marketing Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1.7. Project Operational Risks .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.8. Financial Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.9. Summary Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Network Investment Programme
    RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME JUNE 2021 Cover: Renewing aged rail and turnouts is part of maintaining the network. This page: Upgrade work on the commuter networks is an important part of the investment programme. 2 | RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME CONTENTS 1. Foreword 4 2. Introduction and approval 5 • Rail Network Investment Programme at a glance 3. Strategic context 8 4. The national rail network today 12 5. Planning and prioritising investment 18 6. Investment – national freight and tourism network 24 7. Investment – Auckland and Wellington metro 40 8. Other investments 48 9. Delivering on this programme 50 10. Measuring success 52 11. Investment programme schedules 56 RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME | 3 1. FOREWORD KiwiRail is pleased to present this This new investment approach marks a turning point that is crucial to securing the future of rail and unlocking its inaugural Rail Network Investment full potential. Programme. KiwiRail now has certainty about the projected role of rail Rail in New Zealand is on the cusp of in New Zealand’s future, and a commitment to provide an exciting new era. the funding needed to support that role. Rail has an increasingly important role to play in the This Rail Network Investment Programme (RNIP) sets out transport sector, helping commuters and products get the tranches of work to ensure the country has a reliable, where they need to go – in particular, linking workers resilient and safe rail network. with their workplaces in New Zealand’s biggest cities, and KiwiRail is excited about taking the next steps towards connecting the nation’s exporters to the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Network Upgrade
    WELLINGTON NETWORK UPGRADE Better rail services for the region. Around 500,000 Wellingtonians and visitors take over 14 million passenger journeys each year on our Metro Rail Network. KiwiRail, Greater Wellington Regional Council and Metlink are working together to modernise the rail, thanks to investment of almost $300 million from the Government to enable: Train services to be more reliable. More people and freight travelling on rail in the future. The Wellington Metro Upgrade Programme is being delivered on a busy, well-maintained but ageing network where trains run 18 hours a day. The focus of our work is: Renewing existing network infrastructure to improve rail services. Renewing traction power overhead line system and signals power supply, and improving the track across the network including inside the four major tunnels. Adding capacity to the network so more people can travel on trains in the future while still allowing for freight services. This includes: Double tracking between Trentham and Upper Hutt. Improvements to Wellington station approaches. Changes at Plimmerton. More information www.kiwirail.co.nz (Wellington Metro Upgrade) HUTT LINE DOUBLE TRACKING More frequent, reliable trains. The 2.7 kilometres of rail line between Trentham and Upper Hutt is being double tracked so trains can travel in both directions at the same time. This will allow more frequent and reliable services along this section of the busy line from Wellington to Upper Hutt and Wairarapa. Stations are being upgraded and we are making it safer around our tracks. Wairarapa Existing Upper Hutt Future Connecting new second track to the network Level crossing upgrade at Blenheim Street Wallaceville Closing pedestrian crossing just North of Wallaceville New platform with shelters will be built in the style of Ava’s (pictured).
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Open Day the Strand Railway Station, Ngaoho Place, Parnell 10Am – 4Pm, Sunday 29 September 2013
    Auckland Open Day The Strand Railway Station, Ngaoho Place, Parnell 10am – 4pm, Sunday 29 September 2013 Media contact: Kimberley Brady (021) 942 519 COME AND SEE: • The Exhibition Express - Jump into the drivers seat of a KiwiRail locomotive and talk with the locomotive engineer (train driver) - Get on board our new KiwiRail Scenic passenger carriages - Discover the amazing achievements of our early rail builders in our Moving through the Times display - Enjoy an experiential journey in our Moving Experience display - Learn more about the way rail Moves the Economy - Find out about the importance of Moving Safely and Responsibly when near rail • Career Opportunities - Talk with our Human Resources team about the many job opportunities that exist in KiwiRail, KiwiRail Scenic, Interislander, and KiwiRail Freight • Safety Awareness - Talk with our Safety Team about keeping safe near the track • Heritage trains on show - Take a look back in time by viewing Mainline Steam’s Ja1275, which will be on display. OTHER ACTIVITIES: Calling all Aucklanders to do ‘The Loco...motion!’ We want to rock Auckland with the largest locomotion dance ever seen! We loved it when Kylie did it – now it’s your turn. Bust out your 80s party moves, put on your dancing shoes and join in the fun! Join the ZM Black Thunders at KiwiRail “Keeping NZ on the Move” Exhibition Express open day at 11:30am and do the Locomotion. Don’t be a-freight! The Exhibition Express Prize Draw The prize of a return journey aboard KiwiRail Scenic’s Northern Explorer service for a family (2 adults and 3 children) will be drawn at the Open Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay of Plenty Region Passenger and Freight Rail FINAL Report May 2019
    1 | P a g e Bay of Plenty Passenger and Freight Rail Phase 1 Investigation Report May 2019 Contents Page Contents Page ......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 Overall Findings and Future Opportunities ................................................................................. 6 2.1 Overall Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Future Opportunities ............................................................................................................ 10 3.0 Bay of Plenty Passenger and Freight Rail Investigation 2019 ................................................... 13 3.1 Phase 1 Investigation ............................................................................................................ 13 3.2 Stakeholders / Partners ........................................................................................................ 13 3.3 New Zealand Transport Agency Business Case Approach .................................................... 14 3.4 Bay of Plenty Rail Strategy 2007 ........................................................................................... 14 4.0 National Strategy and Policy Settings ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hokitika to Westport Tourist Rail Feasibility Study: Stop/Go Report
    Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Overview ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Key Findings – Markets and Visitor Hubs ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Key Findings – Additional Factors to Drive Visitor Growth ............................................................................... 3 1.4. Key Findings – Financial Results ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.5. Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.6. Marketing Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1.7. Project Operational Risks .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.8. Financial Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.9. Summary Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering Rail Decarbonisation to New Zealand
    Delivering rail decarbonisation to New Zealand TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGE AND BOLD DECISIONS REQUIRED TO DELIVER A DECARBONISED RAIL NETWORK IN NEW ZEALAND. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................3 Contents 2 Challenges ............................................................................................................4 3 Opportunity .........................................................................................................7 4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................9 PAGE | 2 WSP | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 01 Introduction Angus Gabara, Principal Rail and Transit Advisory Here, KiwiRail has embarked on a study to understand WSP NZ Rail and Transit discipline, describes the the costs of completing the electrification partos of the transformational change and bold decisions required network including: to deliver a decarbonised rail network in Aotearoa, • the North Island Main Trunk Line between Auckland New Zealand. and Wellington, At the end of 2020, with mounting pressure to affect • the East Coast Main Trunk to Tauranga, change that delivers its carbon reduction goal, the Labour Government declared a climate emergency • the Wairarapa line to Masterton for New Zealand. The transport industry’s response to Electrification will be a huge step towards this emergency is pivotal and the rail industry is no decarbonisation, and provide efficient and safe exception. intercity
    [Show full text]
  • Kordia Group Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 2016
    SAFETY OF LIFE BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS KORDIA GROUP ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 BROADCAST AND CYBER SECURITY COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS TABLE of CONTENTS 1 CHAIR’S REPORT 3 CEO’S REPORT 5 KORDIA GROUP BOARD MEMBERS 7 DIRECTORS’ REPORT 8 STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY 9 KORDIA GROUP STORIES 30 INCOME STATEMENT 31 STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 32 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 33 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 34 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 35 STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES 43 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 63 REPORT OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL 65 STATEMENT OF PERFORMANCE 67 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION P.1 CHAIR’S REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 KORDIA GROUP DELIVERS BUMPER $12.3M PROFIT Specialist telecommunications, broadcast and cyber security business Kordia Group has reported a 2016 net profit after tax of $12.3m, exceeding its target by $5.6m (85 per cent) and achieving a 33 per cent increase over the preceding year’s $9.2m. Kordia has also delivered special In the competitive telecommunications space; where Kordia and interim dividends during the differentiates itself through a focus on delivering mission- past year with a final dividend of critical networks for business customers, the company is $7.5m, bringing the total for the growing well. Our telecommunications business has seen year to more than $13m. positive growth in service offerings and customers. It’s the diversity of our services offering – which spans radio, IP Return on equity is 13 per cent (up networks, infrastructure, design and engineering, consulting, 2 per cent), and the company ends and cyber security – that provides resilience and positions the the financial year with no debt and company well for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Mahere Waka Whenua Ā-Rohe Regional Land Transport Plan 2021 - 2031
    Mahere Waka Whenua ā-rohe Regional Land Transport Plan 2021 - 2031 1 Mahere Waka Whenua ā-rohe Regional Land Transport Plan - 2021-2031 AUTHOR SERVICE CENTRES Horizons Regional Transport Committee, Kairanga which includes: Cnr Rongotea and Kairanga -Bunnythorpe Roads, Horizons Regional Council Palmerston North Marton Horowhenua District Council 19 Hammond Street Palmerston North City Council Taumarunui Manawatū District Council 34 Maata Street Whanganui District Council REGIONAL HOUSES Tararua District Council Palmerston North Rangitīkei District Council 11-15 Victoria Avenue Ruapehu District Council Whanganui 181 Guyton Street Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency New Zealand Police (advisory member) DEPOTS KiwiRail (advisory member) Taihape Torere Road, Ohotu Road Transport Association NZ (advisory member) Woodville AA road users (advisory member) 116 Vogel Street Active transport/Public transport representative (advisory member) CONTACT 24 hr freephone 0508 800 800 [email protected] www.horizons.govt.nz Report No: 2021/EXT/1720 POSTAL ADDRESS ISBN 978-1-99-000954-9 Horizons Regional Council, Private Bag 11025, Manawatū Mail Centre, Palmerston North 4442 Rārangi kaupapa i Table of contents He Mihi Nā Te Heamana - Introduction From The Chair 02 Rautaki Whakamua - Strategic Context And Direction 03 1 He kupu whakataki - Introduction 04 1.1 Te whāinga o te Mahere / Purpose of the Plan 05 Te hononga o te Mahere Waka Whenua ā-Rohe ki ētahi atu rautaki - Relationship of the Regional Land Transport Plan to other 1.2 06 strategic documents 2 Horopaki
    [Show full text]
  • IN the MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and in THE
    IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a Board of Inquiry appointed under section 149J of the Resource Management Act 1991 to consider a Plan Change Request by Tainui Group Holdings Limited and Chedworth Properties Limited. STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF DAVID GORDON FOR KIWIRAIL HOLDINGS LIMITED 26 MARCH 2014 STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF DAVID GORDON ON BEHALF OF KIWIRAIL HOLDINGS LIMITED 1. INTRODUCTION Qualifications and experience 1.1 My full name is David Stuart Gordon. 1.2 I am the General Manager Network Performance for KiwiRail Holdings Limited (“KiwiRail”), and am authorised to present this evidence on behalf of KiwiRail. The specific accountabilities within my portfolio relevant to this evidence are: (a) Network Planning and Capital Budgeting; (b) Access Rights and Network Control Services; (c) Asset Management Planning; and (d) Resource Management Act Planning. 1.3 I have been involved in the rail business either as a contractor or employee for 14 years. 1.4 I have a BA and Diploma of Town Planning, although I have never practised as a planner and make no claims to be an expert in that discipline. 1.5 Given my evidence touches on noise it may also be relevant that I have had some exposure to noise issues in my previous employment. I was the Planning and Development Manager for Wellington International Airport Limited in the 1990’s with RMA responsibility when innovations such as the air noise boundary, and Noise Management Plans were introduced. However I make no claims to be an expert in noise matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Occupational Noise Exposure Levels on the Wellington Suburban Tranz Metro Rail Service
    Evaluation of occupational noise exposure levels on the Wellington Suburban Tranz Metro Rail Service 1 Ka’isa Beech and 2 Stuart J McLaren 1 Advanced student at Massey University and Wellington Suburban On-board Staff Member, KiwiRail, Wellington 2 School of Public Health, Massey University, Wellington 2 Email: [email protected] Abstract An occupational noise evaluation study was carried out by Massey University students on locomotive engineers and on-board staff on the two main train sets operating on the Wellington Rail Suburban Network. All measurement results conducted as part of the study show full compliance with the criteria for workplace noise exposure prescribed within the Health and Safety in Employment Regulations 1995. The health and safety noise criterion level permits a maximum dose of 100% which is equivalent to 85 dB LAeq for a normalised 8 hour working day. The highest measured sound exposure was 13% of the total permitted exposure. All occupational noise measurements were observed and written accounts were taken by the three person investigation team. Observations revealed atypical behaviour of one participant which likely compromised one set of readings. This atypical result was removed from the analysis and therefore did not alter the study conclusions. Regardless, such observed behaviour from the study team, reinforces the value of observed real time field monitoring during collection of data. Original peer-reviewed student paper 1. Introduction and purpose of About Ka’isa Beech assessment Age 23, is training to be a The Tranz Metro Rail Passenger Service is operated by Train Traffic Controller KiwiRail and funded by the Greater Wellington Regional with KiwiRail.
    [Show full text]
  • Minister of Transport Four Year Plan for the Transport Sector 2014
    The Treasury Budget 2014 Information Release Release Document July 2014 www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/informationreleases/budget/2014 Key to sections of the Official Information Act 1982 under which information has been withheld. Certain information in this document has been withheld under one or more of the following sections of the Official Information Act, as applicable: [1] 6(a) - to prevent prejudice to the security or defence of New Zealand or the international relations of the government [2] 6(c) - to prevent prejudice to the maintenance of the law, including the prevention, investigation, and detection of offences, and the right to a fair trial [3] 9(2)(a) - to protect the privacy of natural persons, including deceased people [4] 9(2)(b)(ii) - to protect the commercial position of the person who supplied the information or who is the subject of the information [5] 9(2)(ba)(i) - to prevent prejudice to the supply of similar information, or information from the same source, and it is in the public interest that such information should continue to be supplied. [6] 9(2)(d) - to avoid prejudice to the substantial economic interests of New Zealand [7] 9(2)(f)(iv) - to maintain the current constitutional conventions protecting the confidentiality of advice tendered by ministers and officials [8] 9(2)(g)(i) - to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and frank expression of opinions [9] 9(2)(h) - to maintain legal professional privilege [10] 9(2)(i) - to enable the Crown to carry out commercial activities without disadvantage or prejudice [11] 9(2)(j) - to enable the Crown to negotiate without disadvantage or prejudice [12] 9(2)(k) - to prevent the disclosure of official information for improper gain or improper advantage [13] Not in scope [14] 6(e)(iv) - to damage seriously the economy of New Zealand by disclosing prematurely decisions to change or continue government economic or financial policies relating to the entering into of overseas trade agreements.
    [Show full text]