Oligocene Zeiformes (Teleostei) from the Polish Carpathians
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ecography ECOG-01937 Hattab, T., Leprieur, F., Ben Rais Lasram, F., Gravel, D., Le Loc’H, F
Ecography ECOG-01937 Hattab, T., Leprieur, F., Ben Rais Lasram, F., Gravel, D., Le Loc’h, F. and Albouy, C. 2016. Forecasting fine- scale changes in the food-web structure of coastal marine communities under climate change. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.01937 Supplementary material Forecasting fine-scale changes in the food-web structure of coastal marine communities under climate change by Hattab et al. Appendix 1 List of coastal exploited marine species considered in this study Species Genus Order Family Class Trophic guild Auxis rochei rochei (Risso, 1810) Auxis Perciformes Scombridae Actinopterygii Top predators Balistes capriscus Gmelin, 1789 Balistes Tetraodontiformes Balistidae Actinopterygii Macro-carnivorous Boops boops (Linnaeus, 1758) Boops Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Basal species Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo, 1827) Carcharhinus Carcharhiniformes Carcharhinidae Elasmobranchii Top predators Dasyatis pastinaca (Linnaeus, 1758) Dasyatis Rajiformes Dasyatidae Elasmobranchii Top predators Dentex dentex (Linnaeus, 1758) Dentex Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Macro-carnivorous Dentex maroccanus Valenciennes, 1830 Dentex Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Macro-carnivorous Diplodus annularis (Linnaeus, 1758) Diplodus Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Forage species Diplodus sargus sargus (Linnaeus, 1758) Diplodus Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Macro-carnivorous (Geoffroy Saint- Diplodus vulgaris Hilaire, 1817) Diplodus Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Basal species Engraulis encrasicolus (Linnaeus, 1758) Engraulis -
DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project
DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1. -
Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences. -
Order ZEIFORMES PARAZENIDAE Parazens P.C
click for previous page Zeiformes: Parazenidae 1203 Order ZEIFORMES PARAZENIDAE Parazens P.C. Heemstra, South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, South Africa iagnostic characters: Small to moderate-sized (to 30 cm) oblong fishes, the head and body com- Dpressed; body depth slightly less than head length, contained 2.6 to 2.9 times in standard length; head naked, the bones thin and soft; opercular bones weakly serrate; mouth large, terminal, the upper jaw extremely protrusile; maxilla widely expanded posteriorly, and mostly exposed when mouth is closed; no supramaxilla; jaws with 1 or 2 rows of small, slender, conical teeth; vomer with a few short stout teeth;gill rakers (including rudiments) 2 on upper limb, 8 on lower limb.Eye diameter about 1/3 head length and slightly less than snout length.Branchiostegal rays 7.Dorsal fin divided, with 8 slender spines and 26 to 30 soft rays; anal fin with 1 minute spine and 30 to 32 soft rays; dorsal-, anal-, and pectoral-fin rays un- branched; caudal fin forked, with 11 principal rays and 9 branched rays; pectoral fin with 15 or 16 rays, shorter than eye diameter; pelvic fins with 1 unbranched and 5 or 6 branched soft rays, but no spine, fin origin posterior to a vertical at pectoral-fin base. Scales moderate in size, weakly ctenoid, and deciduous; 2 lateral lines originating on body at upper end of operculum and running posteriorly about 4 scale rows apart, gradually converging to form a single line on caudal peduncle. Caudal peduncle stout, the least depth about equal to its length and slightly less than eye diameter.Vertebrae 34.Colour: body reddish or silvery; large black blotch on anterior margin of dorsal fin. -
Percomorph Phylogeny: a Survey of Acanthomorphs and a New Proposal
BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 52(1): 554-626, 1993 PERCOMORPH PHYLOGENY: A SURVEY OF ACANTHOMORPHS AND A NEW PROPOSAL G. David Johnson and Colin Patterson ABSTRACT The interrelationships of acanthomorph fishes are reviewed. We recognize seven mono- phyletic terminal taxa among acanthomorphs: Lampridiformes, Polymixiiformes, Paracan- thopterygii, Stephanoberyciformes, Beryciformes, Zeiformes, and a new taxon named Smeg- mamorpha. The Percomorpha, as currently constituted, are polyphyletic, and the Perciformes are probably paraphyletic. The smegmamorphs comprise five subgroups: Synbranchiformes (Synbranchoidei and Mastacembeloidei), Mugilomorpha (Mugiloidei), Elassomatidae (Elas- soma), Gasterosteiformes, and Atherinomorpha. Monophyly of Lampridiformes is justified elsewhere; we have found no new characters to substantiate the monophyly of Polymixi- iformes (which is not in doubt) or Paracanthopterygii. Stephanoberyciformes uniquely share a modification of the extrascapular, and Beryciformes a modification of the anterior part of the supraorbital and infraorbital sensory canals, here named Jakubowski's organ. Our Zei- formes excludes the Caproidae, and characters are proposed to justify the monophyly of the group in that restricted sense. The Smegmamorpha are thought to be monophyletic principally because of the configuration of the first vertebra and its intermuscular bone. Within the Smegmamorpha, the Atherinomorpha and Mugilomorpha are shown to be monophyletic elsewhere. Our Gasterosteiformes includes the syngnathoids and the Pegasiformes -
Otolith Atlas for the Western Mediterranean, North and Central Eastern Atlantic
SCIENTIA MARINA 72S1 July 2008, 7-198, Barcelona (Spain) ISSN: 0214-8358 Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic VICTOR M. TUSET 1, ANTONI LOMBARTE 2 and CARLOS A. ASSIS 3 1 Instituto Canario de Ciencias Marinas, Departamento de Biología Pesquera, P.O. Box. 56, E-35200 Telde (Las Palmas), Canary Islands, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Institut de Ciències del Mar-CSIC, Departament de Recursos Marins Renovables, Passeig Marítim 37-49, Barcelona 08003, Catalonia, Spain. 3 Instituto de Oceanografia e Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande 1749-016, Lisboa, Portugal. SUMMARY: The sagittal otolith of 348 species, belonging to 99 families and 22 orders of marine Teleostean fishes from the north and central eastern Atlantic and western Mediterranean were described using morphological and morphometric characters. The morphological descriptions were based on the otolith shape, outline and sulcus acusticus features. The mor- phometric parameters determined were otolith length (OL, mm), height (OH, mm), perimeter (P; mm) and area (A; mm2) and were expressed in terms of shape indices as circularity (P2/A), rectangularity (A/(OL×OH)), aspect ratio (OH/OL; %) and OL/fish size. The present Atlas provides information that complements the characterization of some ichthyologic taxa. In addition, it constitutes an important instrument for species identification using sagittal otoliths collected in fossiliferous layers, in archaeological sites or in feeding remains of bony fish predators. Keywords: otolith, sagitta, morphology, morphometry, western Mediterranean, north eastern Atlantic, central eastern Atlantic. RESUMEN: Otolitos de peces del mediterráneo occidental y del atlántico central y nororiental. -
SCRS/1999/092 Rev. Col.Vol.Sci.Pap
femelles étaient le Lepidopus caudatus, le Scomber japonicus et le Trachurus picturatus, que l’on a détecté dans plus de 50 % des contenus stomacaux de chaque sexe. Toutefois, il semble y avoir une différence notable entre la principale proie préférée par chaque sexe, le L. caudatus chez les femelles et le Capros aper chez les mâles. Pour ce qui est des céphalopodes, l’Ommastrephes bartramii prédominait chez les femelles (22 % des contenus stomacaux), et l’Argonauta argo et l’Histioteutis dofleini (14 %) chez les mâles. Un G-test a servi à comparer la fréquence d’apparition des groupes de proies chez les deux sexes. Aucune différence significative n’a été observée dans l’alimentation entre les mâles et les femelles. Toutefois, la présence plus fréquente de céphalopodes à déplacement rapide, comme l’Ommastrephes bartramii et le Todarodes sagittatus dans l’alimentation des femelles, comme leur absence dans celle des mâles, pourrait indiquer quelque limitation physiologique et quelque différence de comportement entre les sexes. En fait, s’il existe des différences quant au choix de l’habitat des mâles et des femelles, il pourrait également y avoir des différences quant à leur disponibilité à la pêche de palangre. RESUMEN Este documento presenta algunos resultados sobre la dieta del pez espada, Xiphias gladius, en las aguas en torno a Azores. De los 82 estómagos examinados (58 hembras y 24 machos), el 11% estaban vacíos (9 estómagos). En cuanto a los otros 73, se compara entre los sexos la composición por presas y algunas de las peculiaridades biológicas de las especies de presas. -
Zeidae Rafinesque, 1815 - True Dories [=Zeusidi Rafinesque, 1810, Zedia Rafinesque, 1815, ?Aplodia Rafinesque, 1815] Notes: Zeusidi Rafinesque, 1810B:15 [Ref
FAMILY Zeidae Rafinesque, 1815 - true dories [=Zeusidi Rafinesque, 1810, Zedia Rafinesque, 1815, ?Aplodia Rafinesque, 1815] Notes: Zeusidi Rafinesque, 1810b:15 [ref. 3595] (ordine) Zeus [published not in latinized form before 1900; not available, Article 11.7.2] Zedia Rafinesque, 1815:83 [ref. 3584] (family) Zeus [stem corrected to Ze- by Latreille 1825:131 [ref. 31889], confirmed by Bonaparte 1831:158, 174 [ref. 4978]; stem changed to Zen- by Lowe 1839:82 [ref. 2829], confirmed by Gill 1873:787 [ref. 17631]; stem Ze- confirmed by Nelson 1976:192 [ref. 32838] and by Nelson 2006:307 [ref. 32486]] ?Aplodia Rafinesque, 1815:84 [ref. 3584] (subfamily) ? Zeus [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] GENUS Zenopsis Gill, 1862 - John dories [=Zenopsis Gill [T. N.], 1862:126, Parazenopsis Cligny [A.], 1909:874 [1]] Notes: [ref. 1659]. Fem. Zeus nebulosus Temminck & Schlegel, 1845. Type by original designation (also monotypic). •Valid as Zenopsis Gill, 1862 -- (Wheeler 1973:349 [ref. 7190], Heemstra 1980:11 [ref. 14195], Machida in Masuda et al. 1984:118 [ref. 6441], Quéro in Whitehead et al. 1986:770 [ref. 13676], Heemstra 1986:437 [ref. 5660], Paxton et al. 1989:389 [ref. 12442], Parin 1989 [ref. 14116], Gomon et al. 1994:420 [ref. 22532], Heemstra 1999:2259 [ref. 24791], Tyler et al. 2003:36 [ref. 26742], Heemstra 2003:1209 [ref. 27043], Nakabo et al.2006:91 [ref. 28907], Paxton et al. 2006:800 [ref. 29077], Bray 2008:439 [ref. 30620], Shinohara et al. 2011:41 [ref. 31715]). Current status: Valid as Zenopsis Gill, 1862. Zeidae. (Parazenopsis) [ref. 850]. -
Annual Scientific Committee Report 2016
SOUTH EAST ATLANTIC FISHERIES ORGANISATION (SEAFO) REPORT OF THE 12th SEAFO SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE 6 October – 14 October 2016 Windhoek, NAMIBIA The Secretariat Strand Street no. 1 Swakopmund, Namibia Phone: +264-64-406885 ___________________________ Facsimile: +264-64-406884 Chairperson: Scientific Committee Email: [email protected] Mr. Paulus Kainge Website: www.seafo.org [email protected] 1. Opening and welcome remarks by the Chairperson 1.1 The 12th Annual Meeting of the SEAFO Scientific Committee (SC) was convened on 6 October to 14 October 2016 at the Safari Hotel & Court, Windhoek, Namibia. The Chairperson, Mr. Paulus Kainge, opened the meeting and welcomed delegates. He emphasized that it would be a discussion of scientific issues and that all delegates were expected to freely express their scientific views so that issues can be resolved and the best possible advice forwarded to the Commission. 2. Adoption of agenda and meeting arrangements 2.1. SC adopted the agenda (Appendix I) with the following points added: Point 19.5: Participation in CECAF meeting on VME’s 8-10 November 2016. Point 19.6: (Japan) Scientific survey in closed area and protocol for reopening of closed areas. Members were informed of practical arrangements of the meeting by the Executive Secretary. 3. Appointment of Rapporteur 3.1 After nomination and secondment, Dr Elizabeth Voges was appointed as rapporteur for the Scientific Committee meeting. 4. Introduction of Observers 4.1 An observer from the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) attended part of the 12th SEAFO Scientific Committee (Appendix II). 5. Introduction of Delegates 5.1 A total of 10 Scientific Committee members representing five Contracting Parties, excluding the SEAFO Secretariat, attended the 12th SEAFO Scientific Committee meeting (Appendix II). -
Relatório E Contas, Ano 2020
RELATÓRIO E CONTAS PROJETAR A INVESTIGAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA PARA RESPONDER AO DESAFIO DO SÉCULO XXI - VIVER BEM DENTRO DOS LIMITES DO PLANETA 2020 IPMA, IP - RELATÓRIO DE ATIVIDADES 2020 ÍNDICE 1. NOTA INTRODUTÓRIA ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. ATIVIDADES REALIZADAS ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 GESTÃO ............................................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 GESTÃO FINANCEIRA ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1.2 GESTÃO DE RECURSOS HUMANOS ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 GESTÃO DE CONTRATOS .......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.4 GESTÃO DE INFRAESTRUTURAS GENÉRICAS ............................................................................................................ 9 2.1.5 GESTÃO DE INFRAESTRUTURAS DE IT E SUPERCOMPUTAÇÃO .............................................................................. 10 2.1.6 GESTÃO DE PRODUTOS, SERVIÇOS E -
The Diet of the Blue Shark (Prionace Glauca L.) in Azorean Waters
THE DIET OF THE BLUE SHARK (PRIONACE GLAUCA L.) IN AZOREAN WATERS M.R. CLARKE, D.C. CLARKE, H.R. MARTINS & H.M. DA SILVA CLARKE,M.R., D.C. CLARKE, H.R. MARTINS & H.M. DA SILVA1996. The diet of the blue shark (Prionace gbauca L.) in Azorean waters. Arquipdago. Life and Marine Sciences 14A: 41-56. Ponta Delgada. ISSN 0873-4704. Stomach contents of 195 Prionace glauca caught off the Azores from October 1993 to July 1994 were studied. Eighty three had empty stomachs. Only 23 contained whole or fleshy parts of animals (other than bait) and all belonged to the fish Capros aper, Macrorhamphosus scolopax and Lepidopus caudatus and the squids Histioteuthis bonnellii and Taonius pavo. Seventy five fish otoliths and 207 cephalopod lower beaks were identified to genus or species. Considering all fragments from the stomachs, including otoliths, cephalopod beaks and eye lenses, a minimum of 1411 fish, 4 crustaceans and 261 cephalopods were represented. Approximately 386 of the fish were represented by eye lenses alone. There was a mean of 2.4 species (1.8 cephalopods and 0.6 fish) and 15.2 animals represented in each stomach. Fish rcmains occurred in 83.0% of the stomachs and contributed 84.5% of animals to the diet. Cephalopod remains occurred in 75.7% and contributed 15.5% of animals. Estimates of the weights of fish and cephalopods suggest that cephalopods are probably the most important in the diet and these were almost entirely meso- or bathypelagic, neutrally buoyant cephalopods. Small epipelagic shoaling fish were present with a few much larger near-bottom fish. -
Order Myctophiformes, Lanternfishes
Order Myctophiformes, lanternfishes • 241 species, 35 genera, 2 families • Deep sea pelagic and benthic, numerically dominant in deep sea habitats • Large terminal mouth (reminiscent of anchovy) • Adipose fin present • Compressed head and body (Myctophiformes = nose serpent shape) Lampridiformes • Large eyes Percopsiformes • Photophores Acanthomorpha •Hollow unsegmented spines on dorsal and anal fins •Rostal and premaxilla cartilidge and ligaments allow greater jaw protrusability Order Lampridiformes, opahs and oarfish Order Lampridiformes, opahs and oarfish • Oarfish • 19 species, 12 genera, 7 families – Longest teleost – over 30 feet • no true spines in fins – Only one individual observed • unique upper jaw protrusion – alive, used amiiform maxilla not directly attached to swimming ethmoid or palentine • deep bodied or ribbon-like • pelagic and deep water marine 1 Order Percopsiformes, trout perch, pirate perch, cavefish • 3 families, 7 genera, 9 species • All freshwater • Few with adipose fins – one of the most derived fishes with them • Pirate perch (Aphredoderidae) – One species – Fairly extensive parental care – Anus migration • Cavefish (Amblyopsidae) Zeiformes – Reduction or loss of eyes Gadiformes – Sensory papillae on head, body and tail Acanthomorpha •Hollow unsegmented spines on – Anus migration dorsal and anal fins •Rostal and premaxilla cartilidge – Convergent evolution of cave fish and ligaments allow greater jaw and other cave characins, protrusability catfishes etc. Order Zeiformes Order Gadiiformes • Dories • 555 species,