Development of New Tuberculosis Drug Regimens­

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Development of New Tuberculosis Drug Regimens­ TB Workshop July 19, 2017 Page 1 1 FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA) 2 3 4 5 DEVELOPMENT OF NEW TUBERCULOSIS DRUG REGIMENS­ 6 SCIENTIFIC AND CLINICAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 7 PUBLIC WORKSHOP 8 9 10 Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11 12 13 White Oak Campus 14 10903 New Hampshire Avenue 15 Silver Spring, Maryland 20903 16 17 18 19 20 Reported by: Michael Farkas 21 Capital Reporting Company 22 www.CapitalReportingCompany.com 202-857-3376 TB Workshop July 19, 2017 Page 2 Page 4 1 PARTICIPANTS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Cathy Bansbach, PhD, Bill & Melinda Gates 2 AGENDA ITEM Page 3 Foundation, Seattle, WA 3 Introductory Remarks/Panel Introduction - Ed Cox 6 4 Dakshina Chilukuri, PhD, OCP, CDER, FDA 4 LANDSCAPE AND PRECLINICAL APPROACHES TO INFORM 5 Edward Cox, MD, OAP, CDER, FDA 5 CLINICAL CANDIDATES FOR TB COMBINATION REGIMENS 6 John Farley, MD, OAP, CDER, FDA 6 Co-chairs John Farley, Philip LoBue 7 Lawrence Geiter, PhD, Otsuka, Rockville, MD 7 Landscape and Important Challenges 8 Steve Gitterman, MD, PhD, OIR, CDRH, FDA 8 Philip LoBue 16 9 Debra Hanna, PhD, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, 9 Cathy Bansbach 31 10 AZ 10 Need for Accessibility of New TB Drug 43 11 Karen Higgins, Sc.D., OAP, CDER, FDA 11 Regimens: Patient and Community Perspective 12 David Hughes, MD, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, 12 Erica Lessem 13 Switzerland 13 What's New in Preclinical Tools Used for 65 14 Dmitri Iarikov, MD, DAIP, OAP, FDA 14 Evaluation of New Components of TB Regimens 15 Erica Lessem, MPH, Treatment Action Group, New 15 Eric Nuermberger 16 York City, NY 16 Assessing TB Drug Pharmacokinetics in 96 17 Christian Lienhardt, MD, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland 17 Clinical Studies - Charles Peloquin 18 Philip LoBue, MD, CDC, Atlanta, GA 18 TB Biomarkers and Clinical Utility 115 19 Payam Nahid, MD, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 19 Payam Nahid 20 Sumathi Nambiar, MD, DAIP, OAP, FDA 20 New Approaches to TB Diagnostics 139 21 Eric Nuermberger, MD, Johns Hopkins University 21 Marco Schito 22 School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 22 CPTR Role in Facilitating TB Drug 153 Page 3 Page 5 1 Sheral Patel, MD, DAIP, OAP, FDA 1 AGENDA ITEM PAGE 2 Charles Peloquin, PharmD, Emerging Pathogens 2 Development - Debra Hann 3 Institute, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL 3 Public Presentations 168 4 Patrick Phillips, PhD, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 4 Panel Discussion 173 5 Marco Schito, PhD, Critical Path Institute, 5 NEW CLINICAL APPROACHES FOR TB REGIMEN DEVELOPMENT 6 Tucson, AZ 6 Session Co-Chairs - Sumathi Nambiar, Mel Spigelman 7 Mel Spigelman, MD, Global Alliance for TB Drug 7 Regulatory Overview - Karen Higgins 189 8 Development, New York, NY 8 New Approaches to TB Drug Development: 9 Jeffrey Starke, MD, Baylor College of Medicine, 9 Developer and Industry Perspective 10 Houston, TX 10 Mel Spigelman 207 11 Joe Toerner, MD, DAIP, OAP, FDA 11 Charles Wells 224 12 Andrew Vernon, MD, CDC, Atlanta, GA 12 Tuberculosis Trials Consortium: CDC 13 Charles Wells, MD, Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ 13 Experience - Andrew Vernon 244 14 Yuliya Yasinskaya, MD, DAIP, OAP, FDA 14 Trial Design Considerations in Pediatric 260 15 15 Populations - Jeffrey Starke 16 16 Lessons Learned from Completed TB Trials 280 17 17 and Implications for Future Trials ­ 18 18 Christian Lienhardt 19 19 Panel Discussion 304 20 20 Closing Remarks 334 21 21 Adjourn 335 22 22 2 (Pages 2 - 5) www.CapitalReportingCompany.com 202-857-3376 TB Workshop July 19, 2017 Page 6 Page 8 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 1 And lots of credit goes to the TB community, including 2 DR. COX: I wanted to welcome everybody today 2 the drug developers, the philanthropists, scientists 3 to our TB drug development workshop. We will be 3 from all sectors, patient advocacy groups, folks in 4 talking a lot about a regimen development and having 4 government, both here in the US and abroad, and 5 some discussions around all that. I really do 5 nongovernmental organizations that remain dedicated to 6 appreciate everybody making the time to join us here 6 the work of developing new therapies for TB and caring 7 today. 7 for patients with TB. 8 And, first, let me just start off with some 8 And, at least in my view, as I reflect on the 9 logistics, just so we can plan ahead a little bit. You 9 area, I think one of the things that has made things so 10 may have noticed as you walked in, there is a window 10 successful in this area is really the attention to 11 just beyond these large rooms and it is where lunch is 11 sound scientific principles and the dedication to work 12 served. And so, if you can order ahead of time, so if 12 in this field. We all recognize that this is an area 13 we can get your orders in, say, by about 10:30 in the 13 where there are unmet needs and that we can exercise 14 morning, that can help a little bit with the lunchtime 14 flexibility and balance benefits and risks. But I 15 crunch, because then they're all prepared for serving 15 think what allows us to do that is that underlying this 16 the individuals. So, it's always important to make 16 foundation of flexibility is the sound science that is 17 sure that everybody gets fed during lunchtime, so just 17 going on in the field, and that's great. 18 check with that window, if you can. Hopefully, we'll 18 If we can think back to TB therapies, the last 19 be able to do that during the break. The folks over 19 new TB drug approval here in the US was bedaquiline for 20 there should be expecting people to come out. 20 MDR-TB that was approved in late 2012. But for those 21 Now, moving on to the topic for today. I 21 that follow the field, there has also been a lot of 22 mean, as folks know here, probably better than I, the 22 other important activity that has been going on out Page 7 Page 9 1 TB issue with global burden of disease really is 1 there reported in journal articles and press releases, 2 phenomenal, a tremendous cause of morbidity and 2 and such. And so, we thought it would be a good 3 mortality with 10.4 million new cases of TB reported 3 opportunity to get the field together to discuss some 4 worldwide by the WHO. With 2.2 million cases in 4 of the important progress that has been made in the 5 patients living with HIV, and estimates of 480,000 5 field and share that more broadly. That's one of the 6 cases of MDR-TB in 2015. So, the burden of disease is 6 reasons, too, why we'll talk some about regimen 7 tremendous. 7 development. 8 We also know, too, folks working this area 8 And we're grateful, too, for the field's 9 know how particularly challenging it is to develop new 9 general willingness to describe ongoing development 10 therapies for TB, and the treatments are long, require 10 programs and have the chance to hear from the groups 11 multiple drug therapy. And it's really not an area 11 that are involved in this work. We'll hear some 12 that is economically attractive for drug development. 12 preliminary results from clinical trials to date, and I 13 While we know the burden of disease is large, the areas 13 think we'll all benefit by hearing and learning from 14 of the world where the burden of disease is largest are 14 their experiences. 15 not ones that have resources. And typically, it's low 15 And then if you'll look at the agenda, too, 16 and middle-income countries where there is limited 16 today, you'll see that we're going to span a range of 17 resources to be able to afford treatment and access to 17 topics over a really fairly packed agenda. We'll start 18 care can oftentimes be challenging. 18 out with hearing some about the current TB landscape 19 But, really, despite these challenges, as I 19 patient needs, and then move on to preclinical and 20 look around the room and think about the 20 clinical development with a focus on TB regimen 21 accomplishments of this group, the folks that have been 21 development. And then to guide our discussion over the 22 involved in TB work, I mean, it really is remarkable. 22 course of the day, following the talks in the morning 3 (Pages 6 - 9) www.CapitalReportingCompany.com 202-857-3376 TB Workshop July 19, 2017 Page 10 Page 12 1 and the talks in the afternoon, we have a series of 1 I'm the deputy director for safety in the Division of 2 questions that we'll try and cover during panel 2 Anti-Infective Products at CDER, FDA. 3 discussions, both in the morning and the afternoon. I 3 DR. NAHID: Good morning. My name is Payam 4 look forward to hearing those discussions, and I hope 4 Nahid. I'm at the University of California-San 5 everybody has a chance to engage in the panel 5 Francisco. I am a TB clinical trialist working with 6 discussions. 6 the CDC TB trials consortium. 7 Today is a workshop, which is different than 7 DR.
Recommended publications
  • Successful Treatment of Rifampicin Resistant Case of Leprosy by WHO Recommended Ofloxacin and Minocycline Regimen
    Lepr Rev (2019) 90, 456–459 CASE REPORT Successful treatment of rifampicin resistant case of leprosy by WHO recommended ofloxacin and minocycline regimen MALLIKA LAVANIAa, JOYDEEPA DARLONGb, ABHISHEK REDDYb, MADHVI AHUJAa, ITU SINGHa, R.P. TURANKARa & U. SENGUPTAa aStanley Browne Laboratory, The Leprosy Mission Community Hospital, Nand Nagri, New Delhi 110093, India bThe Leprosy Mission Hospital, Purulia, West Bengal 723101, India Accepted for publication 15 July 2019 Summary A 25-year-old male treated for leprosy at the age of 15, with MDT, visited TLM Purulia Hospital in July 2017. He was provisionally diagnosed as a lepromatous relapse with ENL reaction. A biopsy was done to test for drug resistance. Drug resistance testing showed resistance to rifampicin. Second line drug regimen recommended by WHO for rifampicin-resistance was started. Within 6 months of taking medication the clinical signs and symptoms improved rapidly and the BI dropped by 1·66 log within 6 months. This case highlights the need for investigations in cases of relapse and the efficacy of WHO recommended second line drug regimen treatment in rifampicin-resistant leprosy cases. Keywords: leprosy, rifampicin-resistance, second-line treatment Introduction Leprosy, also known as Hansen’s disease (HD), is a chronic infectious disease caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae or Mycobacterium lepromatosis.1,2 Leprosy is curable with administration of a rifampicin, clofazimine and dapsone known as multidrug therapy (MDT). Since the introduction of MDT in 1983 the prevalence
    [Show full text]
  • Clofazimine As a Treatment for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: a Review
    Scientia Pharmaceutica Review Clofazimine as a Treatment for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Review Rhea Veda Nugraha 1 , Vycke Yunivita 2 , Prayudi Santoso 3, Rob E. Aarnoutse 4 and Rovina Ruslami 2,* 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40161, Indonesia; [email protected] 2 Division of Pharmacology and Therapy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40161, Indonesia; [email protected] 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran—Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung 40161, Indonesia; [email protected] 4 Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, 6255HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is an infectious disease caused by Mycobac- terium tuberculosis which is resistant to at least isoniazid and rifampicin. This disease is a worldwide threat and complicates the control of tuberculosis (TB). Long treatment duration, a combination of several drugs, and the adverse effects of these drugs are the factors that play a role in the poor outcomes of MDR-TB patients. There have been many studies with repurposed drugs to improve MDR-TB outcomes, including clofazimine. Clofazimine recently moved from group 5 to group B of drugs that are used to treat MDR-TB. This drug belongs to the riminophenazine class, which has lipophilic characteristics and was previously discovered to treat TB and approved for leprosy. This review discusses the role of clofazimine as a treatment component in patients with MDR-TB, and Citation: Nugraha, R.V.; Yunivita, V.; the drug’s properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Mutations Leading to Para-Aminosalicylic Acid Resistance in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Analysis of mutations leading to para-aminosalicylic acid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Received: 9 April 2019 Bharati Pandey1, Sonam Grover2, Jagdeep Kaur1 & Abhinav Grover3 Accepted: 31 July 2019 Thymidylate synthase A (ThyA) is the key enzyme involved in the folate pathway in Mycobacterium Published: xx xx xxxx tuberculosis. Mutation of key residues of ThyA enzyme which are involved in interaction with substrate 2′-deoxyuridine-5′-monophosphate (dUMP), cofactor 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (MTHF), and catalytic site have caused para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS) resistance in TB patients. Focusing on R127L, L143P, C146R, L172P, A182P, and V261G mutations, including wild-type, we performed long molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in explicit solvent to investigate the molecular principles underlying PAS resistance due to missense mutations. We found that these mutations lead to (i) extensive changes in the dUMP and MTHF binding sites, (ii) weak interaction of ThyA enzyme with dUMP and MTHF by inducing conformational changes in the structure, (iii) loss of the hydrogen bond and other atomic interactions and (iv) enhanced movement of protein atoms indicated by principal component analysis (PCA). In this study, MD simulations framework has provided considerable insight into mutation induced conformational changes in the ThyA enzyme of Mycobacterium. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens the efective treatment of tuberculosis (TB) caused by the bacteria Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and has become a serious threat to global public health1. In 2017, there were reports of 5,58000 new TB cases with resistance to rifampicin (frst line drug), of which 82% have developed multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB)2. AMR has been reported to be one of the top health threats globally, so there is an urgent need to proactively address the problem by identifying new drug targets and understanding the drug resistance mechanism3,4.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Delivery Systems on Leprosy Therapy: Moving Towards Eradication?
    pharmaceutics Review Drug Delivery Systems on Leprosy Therapy: Moving Towards Eradication? Luíse L. Chaves 1,2,*, Yuri Patriota 2, José L. Soares-Sobrinho 2 , Alexandre C. C. Vieira 1,3, Sofia A. Costa Lima 1,4 and Salette Reis 1,* 1 Laboratório Associado para a Química Verde, Rede de Química e Tecnologia, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal; [email protected] (A.C.C.V.); slima@ff.up.pt (S.A.C.L.) 2 Núcleo de Controle de Qualidade de Medicamentos e Correlatos, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50740-521, Brazil; [email protected] (Y.P.); [email protected] (J.L.S.-S.) 3 Laboratório de Tecnologia dos Medicamentos, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50740-521, Brazil 4 Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário, Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected] (L.L.C.); shreis@ff.up.pt (S.R.) Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 4 December 2020; Published: 11 December 2020 Abstract: Leprosy disease remains an important public health issue as it is still endemic in several countries. Mycobacterium leprae, the causative agent of leprosy, presents tropism for cells of the reticuloendothelial and peripheral nervous system. Current multidrug therapy consists of clofazimine, dapsone and rifampicin. Despite significant improvements in leprosy treatment, in most programs, successful completion of the therapy is still sub-optimal. Drug resistance has emerged in some countries. This review discusses the status of leprosy disease worldwide, providing information regarding infectious agents, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, actual treatment and future perspectives and strategies on targets for an efficient targeted delivery therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • PRODUCT MONOGRAPH Prmycobutin
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrMYCOBUTIN® (rifabutin capsules USP) 150 mg Capsules Antibacterial Agent Pfizer Canada ULC Date of Preparation: 17,300 Trans-Canada Highway 24 September 2003 Kirkland, Quebec H9J 2M5 Date of revision: February 11, 2021 Control No. 244143 ® Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC Pfizer Canada ULC, licensee Pfizer Canada ULC, 2021 PRODUCT MONOGRAPH NAME OF DRUG PrMYCOBUTIN® (rifabutin capsules USP) 150 mg Capsules THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION Antibacterial Agent ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY MYCOBUTIN (rifabutin) is a derivative of rifamycin S, belonging to the class of ansamycins. The rifamycins owe their antimycobacterial efficacy to their ability to penetrate the cell wall and to their ability to complex with and to inhibit DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Rifabutin has been found to interact with and to penetrate the outer layers of the mycobacterial envelope. Rifabutin inhibits DNA-dependent RNA polymerase in susceptible strains of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis but not in mammalian cells. In resistant strains of E. coli, rifabutin, like rifampin, did not inhibit this enzyme. It is not known whether rifabutin inhibits DNA-dependent RNA polymerase in Mycobacterium avium or in M. intracellulare which constitutes M. avium complex (MAC). Rifabutin inhibited incorporation of thymidine into DNA of rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis suggesting that rifabutin may also inhibit DNA synthesis which may explain its activity against rifampin-resistant organisms. Following oral administration, at least 53% of MYCOBUTIN dose is rapidly absorbed with rifabutin peak plasma concentrations attained in 2 to 4 hours. High-fat meals slow the rate without influencing the extent of absorption of rifabutin from the capsule dosage form. The mean (± SD) absolute bioavailability assessed in HIV positive patients in a multiple dose study was 20% (±16%, n=5) on day 1 and 12% (± 5%, n=7) on day 28.
    [Show full text]
  • MDR-TB): Evidence and Perspectives
    Editorial Classification of drugs to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB): evidence and perspectives Adrian Rendon1,2*, Simon Tiberi3*, Anna Scardigli4*, Lia D’Ambrosio5,6*, Rosella Centis5, Jose A. Caminero7, Giovanni Battista Migliori5 1Center for Research, Prevention and Treatment of Respiratory Infections, University Hospital Dr José Eleuterio Gonzalez, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico; 2Latin American Thoracic Association (ALAT); 3Division of Infection, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; 4The Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland; 5Maugeri Institute, IRCCS, Tradate, Italy; 6Public Health Consulting Group, Lugano, Switzerland; 7Pneumology Department, University Hospital of Gran Canaria “Dr. Negrin”, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain *These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence to: Giovanni Battista Migliori. Maugeri Institute, IRCCS, Via Roncaccio 16, 21049 Tradate, Italy. Email: [email protected]. Submitted Aug 30, 2016. Accepted for publication Sep 05, 2016. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.14 View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.10.14 Multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) (defined Rationale basis of anti-TB treatment as resistance to at least isoniazid and rifampicin), has a The historical principles, derived from randomized clinical relevant epidemiological impact, with 480, 000 cases and trials (RCTs), are still valid: (I) combining different effective 190,000 deaths notified in 2014; 10% of them meet the drugs to prevent the selection of resistant mutants of M. criteria for extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-TB [MDR- tuberculosis; and (II) prolonging the treatment to sterilise the TB with additional resistance to any fluoroquinolone, infected tissues and, therefore, prevent relapse (1,9,10). and to at least one injectable second-line drugs (SLDs)] At least four drugs likely to be effective compose (capreomycin, kanamycin or amikacin) (1,2).
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Listing of ATC Drugs & Codes
    Alphabetical Listing of ATC drugs & codes. Introduction This file is an alphabetical listing of ATC codes as supplied to us in November 1999. It is supplied free as a service to those who care about good medicine use by mSupply support. To get an overview of the ATC system, use the “ATC categories.pdf” document also alvailable from www.msupply.org.nz Thanks to the WHO collaborating centre for Drug Statistics & Methodology, Norway, for supplying the raw data. I have intentionally supplied these files as PDFs so that they are not quite so easily manipulated and redistributed. I am told there is no copyright on the files, but it still seems polite to ask before using other people’s work, so please contact <[email protected]> for permission before asking us for text files. mSupply support also distributes mSupply software for inventory control, which has an inbuilt system for reporting on medicine usage using the ATC system You can download a full working version from www.msupply.org.nz Craig Drown, mSupply Support <[email protected]> April 2000 A (2-benzhydryloxyethyl)diethyl-methylammonium iodide A03AB16 0.3 g O 2-(4-chlorphenoxy)-ethanol D01AE06 4-dimethylaminophenol V03AB27 Abciximab B01AC13 25 mg P Absorbable gelatin sponge B02BC01 Acadesine C01EB13 Acamprosate V03AA03 2 g O Acarbose A10BF01 0.3 g O Acebutolol C07AB04 0.4 g O,P Acebutolol and thiazides C07BB04 Aceclidine S01EB08 Aceclidine, combinations S01EB58 Aceclofenac M01AB16 0.2 g O Acefylline piperazine R03DA09 Acemetacin M01AB11 Acenocoumarol B01AA07 5 mg O Acepromazine N05AA04
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
    [Show full text]
  • Tuberculosis Drug Information Guide, 2Nd Edition
    Tuberculosis Drug Information Guide 2ND EDITION Edmund G. Brown Jr, Governor STATE OF CALIFORNIA Diana S. Dooley, Secretary CALIFORNIA HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY Ron Chapman, MD, MPH, Director DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Tuberculosis Drug Information Guide 2ND EDITION Edmund G. Brown Jr, Governor STATE OF CALIFORNIA Diana S. Dooley, Secretary CALIFORNIA HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY Ron Chapman, MD, MPH, Director DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DrugInfo_2ndEd_v9.indd 3 12/5/12 3:55 PM Tuberculosis Drug Information Guide, 2nd edition was created through a collaboration of the Curry International Tuberculosis Center (CITC) and the State of California Department of Public Health, Tuberculosis Control Branch (CDPH). CITC is a project of the University of California, San Francisco, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The development of this Guide was funded through CDC Cooperative Agreement U52 CCU 900454. Permission is granted for nonprofit educational use and library duplication and distribution. Suggested citation: Curry International Tuberculosis Center and California Department of Public Health, 2012: Tuberculosis Drug Information Guide, 2nd edition. This publication is available on the CITC website: http://www.currytbcenter.ucsf.edu/ tbdruginfo/ Design: Edi Berton Design DrugInfo_2ndEd_v9.indd 4 12/5/12 3:55 PM Contributors Acknowledgments Ann M. Loeffler, MD John S. Bradley, MD Pediatric Infectious Diseases Attending and Director of Pediatric Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California Hospitalists at Randall Children’s Hospital at Legacy Emanuel, Daniel Deck, Pharm.D. Portland, Oregon Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Pediatric Tuberculosis Consultant, San Francisco General Hospital, California Curry International Tuberculosis Center, San Francisco, California David Forinash, RPh Randall Children’s Hospital at Legacy Emanuel, Portland, Oregon Charles A.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria
    Cent. Eur. J. Med. • 4(2) • 2009 • 141-155 DOI: 10.2478/s11536-008-0088-9 Central European Journal of Medicine Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria Review Article Katrijn Bockstael*, Arthur Van Aerschot** Laboratory for Medicinal Chemistry, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Received 9 July 2008; Accepted 17 November 2008 Abstract: The development of antimicrobial resistance by bacteria is inevitable and is considered as a major problem in the treatment of bacterial infections in the hospital and in the community. Despite efforts to develop new therapeutics that interact with new targets, resistance has been reported even to these agents. In this review, an overview is given of the many therapeutic possibilities that exist for treatment of bacterial infections and how bacteria become resistant to these therapeutics. Keywords: Antimicrobial agents • Resistance development • Efflux • Alteration of drug target • Antibacterials © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 1. Introduction 2. Different mechanisms of resistance to antimicrobials The history of humankind can be regarded from a medical point of view as a struggle against infectious 2.1. Intrinsic resistance diseases. Infections were the leading cause of death Bacteria may be inherently resistant to an antimicrobial. th worldwide at the beginning of the 20 century. Since This passive resistance is a consequence of general the discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming in adaptive processes that are not necessary linked to a 1929 and the first introduction of the sulpha drugs by given class of antimicrobials. An example of natural Domagk in 1932, the number of new antimicrobials resistance is Pseudomonas aeruginosa, whose low available has increased tremendously between 1940 membrane permeability is likely to be a main reason for and 1960.
    [Show full text]
  • And Second-Line Drugs in a Murine Model of Tuberculosis
    Sterilizing Activities of Novel Combinations Lacking First- and Second-Line Drugs in a Murine Model of Tuberculosis Kathy Williams,a Austin Minkowski,a Opokua Amoabeng,a Charles A. Peloquin,b Dinesh Taylor,a Koen Andries,c Robert S. Wallis,d Khisimuzi E. Mdluli,e and Eric L. Nuermbergera,f Center for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USAa; College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USAb; Tibotec BVBA, Johnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgiumc; Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, USAd; Global Alliance for TB Drug Development, New York, New York, USAe; and Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USAf Novel oral regimens composed of new drugs with potent activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and no cross-resis- tance with existing agents are needed to shorten and simplify treatment for both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant tu- berculosis. As part of a continuing effort to evaluate novel drug combinations for treatment-shortening potential in a mu- rine model, we performed two long-term, relapse-based experiments. In the first experiment, several 3- and 4-drug Downloaded from combinations containing new agents currently in phase 2/3 trials (TMC207 [bedaquiline], PA-824 and PNU-100480 [sut- ezolid], and/or clofazimine) proved superior to the first-line regimen of rifampin, pyrazinamide, and isoniazid. TMC207 plus PNU-100480 was the most effective drug pair. In the second experiment, in which 3- and 4-drug combinations com- posed of TMC207 and pyrazinamide plus rifapentine, clofazimine, PNU-100480, or both rifapentine and clofazimine were evaluated, the rank order of drugs improving the sterilizing activity of TMC207 and pyrazinamide was as follows: rifapen- tine plus clofazimine > clofazimine > rifapentine > PNU-100480.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5 – Analytic Database Studies
    Arrhythmogenic potential of drugs FP7-HEALTH-241679 http://www.aritmo-project.org/ Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5 – Analytic Database Studies V 1.3 Draft Lead beneficiary: EMC Date: 03/01/2010 Nature: Report Dissemination level: D5.2 Report on Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5: Conduct of Additional Observational Security: Studies. Author(s): Gianluca Trifiro’ (EMC), Giampiero Version: v1.1– 2/85 Mazzaglia (F-SIMG) Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT INFOOMATION AND HISTORY ...........................................................................4 DEFINITIONS .................................................... ERRORE. IL SEGNALIBRO NON È DEFINITO. ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................6 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................7 2. STUDY OBJECTIVES................................ ERRORE. IL SEGNALIBRO NON È DEFINITO. 3. METHODS ..........................................................................................................................8 3.1.STUDY DESIGN ....................................................................................................................8 3.2.DATA SOURCES ..................................................................................................................9 3.2.1. IPCI Database .....................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]