DOCSLIB.ORG

MSC Final Report and Determination for Alaska Pollock – Bering Sea-Aleutian Islands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MSC Final Report and Determination for Alaska Pollock – Bering Sea-Aleutian Islands MSC Final Report and Determination for Alaska Pollock – Bering Sea-Aleutian Islands MRAG Americas, Inc. Don Bowen, Jake Rice, and Robert J. Trumble December 2015 CLIENT DETAILS: At-Sea Processors Association 4039 21st West, Suite 400 Seattle, WA 98199 USA Document template tracking no.: MRAG-MSC-7a-v3 MSC reference standards: MSC Standards Version 1.1 MSC Certification Requirements Version 1.3 MSC Guidance for Certification Requirements Version 1.3 Contents Glossary ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 2 2. Authorship and Peer Reviewers ......................................................................................... 3 2.1 Assessment Team ...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Peer Reviewers ........................................................................................................... 4 3. Description of the Fishery ................................................................................................... 4 3. 1 Unit(s) of Certification and scope of certification sought ............................................ 4 3.2 Overview of the fishery ................................................................................................ 5 3.3 Principle One: Target Species Background................................................................ 6 3. 3.1 General Considerations ....................................................................................... 6 3.3.2 Assessment Information ...................................................................................... 8 3.3.3 Assessment Methods ........................................................................................ 13 3.3.4 Assessment Results .......................................................................................... 17 3.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background .................................................................... 26 3.4.1 BSAI Ecosystems .............................................................................................. 26 3.4.2 Oceanography and bottom sediments .............................................................. 26 3.4.3 Climate ............................................................................................................... 27 3.4.4 Non-target Interactions ...................................................................................... 28 3.4.5 Marine mammals ............................................................................................... 29 3.4.6 Seabirds ............................................................................................................. 30 3.4.7 Retained ............................................................................................................. 32 3.4.8 Bycatch .............................................................................................................. 33 3.4.9 ETP species ....................................................................................................... 37 3.4.10 Habitat ................................................................................................................ 41 3.4.11 Food web ........................................................................................................... 43 3.4.12 Ecosystem Management ................................................................................... 45 3.5 Principle Three: Management System Background ................................................. 47 3.5.1 Area of operation of the fishery and under which jurisdiction it falls ................. 47 3.5.2 Recognized groups with interests in the fishery ................................................ 52 3.5.3 Consultations leading to the formulation of the management plan................... 53 3.5.4 Arrangements for on-going consultations with interest groups ......................... 56 3.5.5 Non-fishery users or activities, which could affect the fishery, and arrangements for liaison and co-ordination...................................................................... 56 3.5.6 Details of the decision-making process or processes, including the recognized participants ....................................................................................................................... 57 3.5.7 Objectives for the fishery ................................................................................... 61 3.5.8 Outline the fleet types or fishing categories participating in the fishery ............ 64 3.5.9 Individuals or groups granted rights of access to the fishery, and the nature of those rights ....................................................................................................................... 64 BSAI Alaska Pollock – Final Report and Determination page i 3.5.10 Description of the measures agreed upon for the regulation of fishing in order to meet the objectives within a specified period .............................................................. 64 3.5.11 Arrangements and responsibilities for monitoring, control and surveillance and enforcement ...................................................................................................................... 65 3.5.12 Details of any planned education and training for interest groups .................... 67 3.5.13 Date of next review and audit of the management plan ................................... 67 3.5.14 Description of fishery’s research plan ............................................................... 67 4. Evaluation Procedure ....................................................................................................... 69 4.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment ............................................................................. 69 4.2 Previous assessments .............................................................................................. 69 4.3 Assessment Methodologies ...................................................................................... 69 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques .................................................................... 69 4.4.1 Site Visits and Consultations ............................................................................. 69 4.4.2 Evaluation Techniques ...................................................................................... 71 5 Traceability ....................................................................................................................... 73 5.1 Eligibility Date ............................................................................................................ 73 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery ................................................................................... 73 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ........................................................... 74 5.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practically Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to Enter Further Chains of Custody ................................................................................................................ 74 6 Evaluation Results ............................................................................................................ 75 6.1 Principle Level Scores ............................................................................................... 75 6.2 Summary of Scores ................................................................................................... 75 6.3 Summary of Conditions ............................................................................................. 76 6.4 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement ................................................. 76 References ............................................................................................................................... 77 Appendices .............................................................................................................................. 89 Appendix 1 Scoring and Rationales ........................................................................................ 89 Principle 1 ......................................................................................................................... 89 Principle 2 ....................................................................................................................... 118 Principle 3 ....................................................................................................................... 164 Appendix 1.1 Conditions .................................................................................................... 185 Appendix 2. Peer Review Reports ........................................................................................ 186 Peer Review No. 1 ............................................................................................................. 187 Peer Review No. 2 ............................................................................................................. 201 Appendix 3. Stakeholder submissions .................................................................................. 207 Appendix 3.1 Site Visit Comments .................................................................................... 207 WWF Comments ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Systematics of Gadid Fishes: Implications for the Biogeographic Origins of Pacific Species
    Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen 19 Molecular systematics of gadid fishes: implications for the biogeographic origins of Pacific species Steven M. Carr, David S. Kivlichan, Pierre Pepin, and Dorothy C. Crutcher Abstract: Phylogenetic relationships among 14 species of gadid fishes were investigated with portions of two mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genes, a 401 base pair (bp) segment of the cytochrome b gene, and a 495 bp segment of the cytochrome oxidase I gene. The molecular data indicate that the three species of gadids endemic to the Pacific Basin represent simultaneous invasions by separate phylogenetic lineages. The Alaskan or walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) is about as closely related to the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) as is the Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus), which suggests that T. chalcogramma and G. macrocephalus represent separate invasions of the Pacific Basin. The Pacific tomcod (Microgadus proximus) is more closely related to the Barents Sea navaga (Eleginus navaga) than to the congeneric Atlantic tomcod (Microgadus tomcod), which suggests that the Pacific species is derived from the Eleginus lineage and that Eleginus should be synonymized with Microgadus. Molecular divergences between each of the three endemic Pacific species and their respective closest relatives are similar and consistent with contemporaneous speciation events following the reopening of the Bering Strait ca. 3.0–3.5 million years BP. In contrast, the Greenland cod (Gadus ogac) and the Pacific cod have essentially identical mtDNA sequences; differences between them are less than those found within G. morhua. The Greenland cod appears to represent a contemporary northward and eastward range extension of the Pacific cod, and should be synonymized with it as G.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishmonger Practice Display and Merchandising
    Fishmonger Practice DISPLAY AND MERCHANDISING Draft Materials This is a typescript from the 1989 Training Manual developed by Seafish. The manual will be updated later in 2018, and until then this typescript will be made available to potential users. The contents of this file remain the intellectual property of the Sae Fish Industry Authority. General Objective: On completion of this training programme trainees will be able to apply basic display and merchandising principles in order to create effective displays of fish and fish products. Session Outline Session Title Time Indicator 1. Scope and purpose of display 1.0 hour 2. Display communication 1.0 hour 3. Product display properties 2.0 hours 4. Display equipment and accessories 3.5 hours 5. Product arrangement 5.0 hours 6. Display maintenance 1.5 hours Total Time Indicator 14.0 hours Contents Page TRAINER’S GUIDE Benefits of systematic training 1 Guide to the manual 2 How to design a training session 7 Setting objectives 9 Use of questions in training 10 Correction coaching 12 SESSION OUTLINES 1. Scope and purpose of display 14 Information sheets 23 2. Display communication 41 Information sheets 49 3. Product display properties 68 Information sheets 87 4. Display equipment and accessories 117 Information sheets 186 5. Product arrangement 224 Information sheets 255 6. Display maintenance 304 Information sheets 331 VISUAL AIDS ADDITIONAL TRAINING RESOURCES 338 Benefits of systematic training This instructor’s manual has been designed to assist the on-the-job training of staff employed in fish retail establishments. Below are listed some of the benefits which can be obtained by following a programme of systematic training.
    [Show full text]
  • (24. APRIL 2019) 1 INNLEDNING 1.1 Bakgrunn Dette Støtteskrivet Er
    STØTTESKRIV (24. APRIL 2019) 1 INNLEDNING 1.1 Bakgrunn Dette støtteskrivet er utarbeidet på vegne av Hav Line Gruppen AS ("Hav Line") som en klargjøring og videre spesifisering av de norske faktiske og rettslige forhold som er gjenstand for Danish Seafood Association ("DSA") sin klage i sak nr. 82637 ("Klagen") . Vårt skriv er overlevert DSA, som har rett til å benytte dette skrivet som grunnlag eller vedlegg i sin videre dialog med ESA i anledning Klagen. Klagen knytter seg til den norske forskriften om kvalitet på fisk og fiskevarer FOR-2013-06-28-844 ("Kvalitetsforskriften") § 17. Bestemmelsen kan spores helt tilbake fra 1984 – altså fra før Norge inngikk EØS-avtalen – og har de siste tiårene vært en "sovende" bestemmelse uten reell betydning for kvalitet eller omdømme til norsk oppdrettslaks. Bestemmelsen legger opp til en menneskelig undersøkelse av fiskens utseende for å vurdere om den er "pen" nok til å selges direkte til utlandet eller om den først må "feilrettes" (i praksis fileteres). Fisken som sorteres ut til "feilretting" (i praksis alminnelig filetering) betegnes i markedet som "produksjonsfisk". Formålet med denne menneskelige undersøkelsen har historisk vært å opprettholde og styrke omdømmet til norsk laks på det utenlandske markedet. Bestemmelsen har altså ingen side til mattrygghet, hygiene, smitterisiko eller liknende – produksjonsfisken er altså fullt ut spiselig som menneskemat – den har kun noen ufarlige skader som uansett skal kuttes bort. I dag selges ikke fisken lenger hel, men i fileter, terninger eller koteletter. Det er dermed ikke lengre en reell risiko for at ytre skader og feil på noe vis kan føre til et omdømmetap.
    [Show full text]
  • [TEMPLATE for SHORT FORM MONOGRAPHS (Jan 1St 2004)]
    COD LIVER OIL This monograph is intended to serve as a guide to industry for the preparation of Product Licence Applications (PLAs) and labels for natural health product market authorization. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review of the medicinal ingredient. It is a referenced document to be used as a labelling standard. Notes: < Text in parentheses is additional optional information which can be included on the PLA and product label at the applicant’s discretion. The solidus (/) indicates that the terms are synonyms or that the statements are synonymous. Either term or statement may be selected by the applicant. < Vitamin E is an optional medicinal ingredient in cod liver oil products. However, no use or purpose statements may be associated with vitamin E. See Appendix 4 for vitamin E proper name, common name, source material, and dose information. < The use(s) or purpose(s) statements in this monograph are based on the efficacy of vitamins A and D, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) that are present in cod liver oil. The references used to support these statements refer to the efficacy of these individual constituents and are not specific to cod liver oil. < See Appendix 1 for Adequate Intake (AI), Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) and Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) definitions for nutrient intake. See also Table 8 in Appendix 2 for RDA and AI values for vitamin A, and Table 9 in Appendix 3 for AI values for vitamin D. Date: February 24, 2010 Proper name(s): Cod liver oil (USP 32; Ph. Eur.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service V.62
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Stewart L. Udall, Secretary FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, Clarence F. Pautzke, Commissioner BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES, Donald L. McKernan, Director BIBLIOGRAPHY ,ON THE BIOLOGY 'OF THE COD Gadus morhua AND RELATED SPECIES By JOHN P. WISE FISHERY BULLETIN 215 From Fishery Bulletin ~f the Fish and Wildlife Service VOLUME 62 Published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service _ Washinl1ton Printed at the U.S. Government PrlntlnQ Office _ WashinQton,1963 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government PrlntlnQ Office, WashlnQton 25, D.C. - Price 40 cents Created in 1849, the Department of the Interior-America's Department of Nattu'nl Resources-is eoncerned with the management, eonservation, and development of the Nation's water, fish, wildlife, mineral, forest, and park and reereational resotu'ces. It also has rililjor responsibilities for Indian and Territorial affairs. As the Nation's principal conservation ageney, the Department works to assure that nonrenewable resow'ces fire developed and used wisely, that park and reCl'eational resources n.re conserved for the future, and that renewable resources mn.ke their full contribution to the progress, prosperity, and security of the United States-now and in the future, II CONTENTS Page Introduction_______________________________________________________________ 483 Bibliography_______________________________________________________________ 484 Index by subjects ~________________________________ 535 Index by geographical areas__ ____ _______ ____ _____________ ____________________ 537 AddClldum __ - ._______ ____ ___ ___ _ 538 III ABSTRACT A bibliography of 1,020 references on the biology of the cod, Gadu8 morhua L., and related species of North American members of the genus Gadu8 whichis reasonably complete through 1959.
    [Show full text]
  • BOEM 2017-066 Genomics of Arctic
    OCS Study BOEM 2017 -066 Genomics of Arctic Cod US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2017-066 Genomics of Arctic Cod 30 September 2017 Authors Robert E. Wilson, George K. Sage, Sarah A. Sonsthagen, Meg C. Gravley, Damian M. Menning and Sandra L. Talbot Prepared under BOEM Award M14PG00008 By U. S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center 4210 University Drive Anchorage, AK 99508 USA US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region DISCLAIMER This study was funded, in part, by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, through Agreement Number M14PG00008 with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Bureau of Oceans Energy and Management. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Data and Information Systems webpage (https://marinecadastre.gov/espis/#) and search on 2017-066. CITATION Wilson, R.E, G.K. Sage, S.A. Sonsthagen, M.C. Gravley, D.M. Menning, and S.L. Talbot. 2017. Genomics of Arctic Cod. Anchorage, AK: US Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Alaska OCS Region. OCS Study BOEM 2017-066. 92pp. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the numerous staff at U.S. Geological Survey for providing samples and for laboratory and graphical assistance. The BOEM Alaska OCS Region contributed to this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Cod Versus Shrimp Dominance in West Greenland Waters: Can Climate Change Reverse the Regime Shift from a Cod to a Shrimp Dominated Ecosystem Off West Greenland?
    Not to be cited without prior reference to the author ICES CM 2009/C:03 Cod versus shrimp dominance in West Greenland waters: Can climate change reverse the regime shift from a cod to a shrimp dominated ecosystem off West Greenland? Kai Wieland 1 and Holger Hovgård 2 1 Technical University of Denmark, National Institute of Aquatic Resources 2 Greenland Institute of Natural Resources Abstract Relative warm conditions prevailed at Greenland from the beginning to the mid of the 20 th century and in this period a self-sustaining and very abundant cod stock existed in West Greenland offshore waters. A prolonged period of decline in stock biomass was observed from 1950 to 1975 at intense fishing. The West Greenland cod stock collapsed completely in the beginning of the 1990s when colder conditions prevailed and mean size at age declined drastically. Air and ocean temperature increased again above average in the end of the 1990s but first in 2005 an initial sign for a rebuilding of the stock has been seen. However, a self-sustaining spawning stock has yet not been re-established in Greenland offshore waters. An offshore fishery for Northern shrimp began in the 1970s and a threefold increase in stock biomass at West Greenland occurred from 1997 to 2003 at moderate fishing levels. In the most recent years, shrimp disappeared from Southwest Greenland where relative high temperatures were recorded, and the stock became more concentrated in the northern areas. Further, recruitment and subsequently stock biomass have decreased considerably in the past and this has raised concerns that the current level of exploitation of the shrimp stock may not be maintained in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Cod to Pacific
    Ice Cod 183 Ice Cod to Pacific Cod Ice Cod (Arctogadus glacialis) (Peters, 1872) Family Gadidae Note on taxonomy: Evidence from morphology and molecular genetics demonstrates that Arctogadus borisovi (Dryagin, 1932) is a junior synonym of A. glacialis [1]. Data on fish originally identified as A. borisovi are included here. Commmonly referred to Ice Cod (Arctogadus glacialis) 221 mm, Chukchi Borderland, as Polar Cod in North America. 2009. Photograph by C.W. Mecklenburg, Point Stephens Colloquial Name: None within U.S. Chukchi and Beaufort Seas. Research. Ecological Role: The ecological role of the species in marine ecosystems of the U.S. Chukchi and Beaufort Seas is not as significant as Polar and Saffron Cod. Physical Description/Attributes: An olive brown to bluish gray cod with darker fins and head. For specific diagnostic characteristics, see Fishes of Alaska (Mecklenburg and others, 2002, p. 291–292) [2]. Swim bladder: Present; no otophysic connection [2]. Antifreeze glycoproteins in blood serum: Unknown. Range: U.S. Beaufort [2] and Chukchi Sea [3, 4]. Worldwide, circumpolar, northward to at least 81°41’N; Arctic Canada south to southern tip of Greenland, east through Barents Sea to East Siberian Sea and Chukchi Sea [2–4]. 184 Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog Relative Abundance: Rare in U.S. Beaufort Sea (two specimens captured north of Point Barrow) [2] and Chukchi Sea (one specimen found on beach at Wainwright) [4].Abundant to at least as far eastward to deep waters off Tuktoyaktuk Peninsula and off Capes Bathurst and
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT ROYAL GREENLAND A/S JANUARY 1ST 2018 - DECEMBER 31ST 2018 ANNUAL REPORT Royal Greenland A/S 2018January 1st - December 31st CVR-No. 13645183 The annual report has been prepared and approved by the ordinary Annual General Meeting on April 30th 2019 Peter Schriver Chairman ANNUAL REPORT 4 5 ROYAL GREENLAND A/S - 2018 FISHERY PRODUCTION QUALITY SALES IN THE KITCHEN THE GROUP'S REPORT We fish in large areas of the At our factories and landing The supply of high-quality We have a well-consolidated Our products are used in many North Atlantic and in the Arctic, facilities, local fishermen and products is the core of our sales and distribution network different cultures, with various VALUE CHAIN with our own fleet and in our own fleet land their daily business. We take responsibility to consign products from flavour preferences, and end Statement by the Management on the Annual Report - 6 collaboration with independent catches of fish and shellfish. for our products, from sea to various locations in Greenland, up as healthy, tasty meals in fishermen. The raw materials are table, and hold certifications in Newfoundland, Quebec, homes, canteens and restau- Auditors' report - 6 processed and packed. accordance with Denmark and Germany to rants all over the world. Financial highlights and key ratios for the Group - 8 international standards. customers throughout the world. North Atlantic activities continue to advance – in a challenging world - 11 Financial statements - 12 Strong earnings in a challenged market - 14 New products and
    [Show full text]
  • Avd. I Lover Og Sentrale Forskrifter Mv
    Nr. 11 – 2013 Side 1791–1940 NORSK LOVTIDEND Avd. I Lover og sentrale forskrifter mv. Nr. 11 Utgitt 29. august 2013 Innhold Side Lover og ikrafttredelser. Delegering av myndighet 2013 Juli 3. Deleg. av myndighet til Miljødirektoratet etter naturmangfoldloven § 18 første ledd og § 18 tredje ledd første punktum når det gjelder lakse- og innlandsfisk (Nr. 857) …………… 1848 Juli 2. Deleg. av myndighet til Vegdirektoratet etter lov om merking av forbruksvarer mv. § 3, § 6, § 7 fjerde ledd, § 8 og § 10 fjerde ledd (Nr. 891) .............................................................. 1885 Juli 18. Deleg. av myndighet til Arbeids- og velferdsdirektoratet til å samtykke i at personell i Arbeids- og velferdsetaten avgir vitneforklaring for domstolene uten hinder av lovbestemt taushetsplikt (Nr. 921) ........................................................................................................... 1929 Forskrifter 2013 Juni 27. Forskrift om stønad til dekning av utgifter til undersøkelse og behandling hos lege (Nr. 843) ....................................................................................................................................... 1791 Juni 28. Forskrift om kvalitet på fisk og fiskevarer (Nr. 844)............................................................. 1818 Juli 2. Forskrift om sertifisering av flygeledere (Nr. 851) ............................................................... 1839 Juli 2. Forskrift om gjennomføring av felles sikkerhetsmetode for tilsyn utført av nasjonal sikkerhetsmyndighet etter utstedelse
    [Show full text]
  • Maturation and Reproductive Cycle of Female Pacific Cod in Waters Adjacent to the Southern Coast of Hokkaido, Japan*1
    Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 58(12), 2245-2252 (1992) Maturation and Reproductive Cycle of Female Pacific Cod in Waters Adjacent to the Southern Coast of Hokkaido, Japan*1 Tsutomu Hattori,*2 Yasunori Sakurai,*2 and Kenji Shimazaki*2 (ReceivedApril 24, 1992) The maturation process and reproductive cycle of female Pacific cod Gadus macrocephalus were examined in the waters adjacent to the southern and southeastern coasts of Hokkaido, Japan, by collecting fish between April 1989 and September 1990. Histological examination was made of the ovaries. During the course of ovarian maturation, a portion of the oocytes became isolated from immature oocytes at the yolk vesicle stage (less than 0.3mm in diameter) and gradually developed into a group of yolky oocytes. When these oocytes reached the migratory nucleus stage (0.5-0.7mm in diameter), they began to change into transparent mature eggs (0.8-0.9mm in diameter) accompanied by hydration and yolk fusion. Following this, all of the mature eggs were simultaneously ovulated into the ovarian cavity. The maturity of female Pacific cod was histologically divided into nine grades from yolkless phase (I) to spent phase (IX). Ovaries gradually developed to the yolk vesicle phase from spring to summer. The onset of yolk formation and the most active yolk formation occurred from August through November. Females with ovaries at the migratory nucleus phase appeared during December and January. From the changes in maturity states and the gonadsomatic index (GSI values), the peak of spwaning in this region was assumed to occur during the period of late December through January. Also, the age of first maturation of female cod was estimated to be four years old.
    [Show full text]
  • Forskrift Om Kvalitet På Fisk Og Fiskevarer - Lovdata
    10/10/2019 Forskrift om kvalitet på fisk og fiskevarer - Lovdata ➦ Gå til opprinnelig kunngjort versjon Forskrift om kvalitet på fisk og fiskevarer FOR-2013-06-28-844 Dato Nærings- og fiskeridepartementet Departement I 2013 hefte 11 Publisert 01.09.2013 Ikrafttredelse FOR-2019-04-24-538 Sist endret FOR-1996-06-14-667, FOR-2009-07-01-967 Endrer Norge Gjelder for LOV-2003-12-19-124-§7, LOV-2003-12-19-124-§9, LOV-2003-12-19-124-§10, LOV-2003-12-19-124-§12, Hjemmel LOV-2003-12-19-124-§13, LOV-2003-12-19-124-§15, LOV-2003-12-19-124-§23, LOV-2003-12-19-124-§30, FOR-2003-12-19-1790, FOR-2004-01-16-93 05.07.2013 kl. 14.20 Kunngjort 24.02.2015 (VIII kapitteloverskrift) Rettet Forskrift om kvalitet på fisk og fiskevarer Korttittel Kapitteloversikt: Kapittel I. Formål, virkeområde og definisjoner (§§ 1 - 3) Kapittel II. Levende fisk (§4) Kapittel III. Om håndtering av fisk (§§ 5 - 9) Kapittel IV. Kvalitetskrav til råstoff (§§ 10 - 14) Kapittel V. Særlige bestemmelser om fisk og fiskevarer til forbruker i Norge (§15) Kapittel VI. Særlige bestemmelser om oppdrettet fisk (§§ 16 - 17) Kapittel VII. Særlige bestemmelser om krepsdyr (§§ 18 - 19) Kapittel VIII. Særlige bestemmelser om salt (§§ 20 - 24) Kapittel IX. Særlige bestemmelser om tørrfisk (§§ 25 - 27) Kapittel X. Krav til emballasje og merking av fisk og fiskevarer (§§ 28 - 35) https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2013-06-28-844 1/16 10/10/2019 Forskrift om kvalitet på fisk og fiskevarer - Lovdata Kapittel XI. Særlige bestemmelser for handel med Brasil (§36) Kapittel XII.
    [Show full text]