135-146  1387  2  10  

e $ .C +H  I$Z X9   6 =?  =.0  $D' $

Chilo suppressalis (: Pyralidae)     f ; H u1  $= 6 =  6

** 0XZ !0#  * #\ LA

87/7/24 : $% /01 ()  86/4/20 : $% &' ()

 !

E= Z iQ  +Z  $ 3   e $  78    ( suppressalis) e $ .C+H  I$Z J +  $= 6 =f Q +H   $C8 & ? .@ + 78 & .$9 $ Q  +, - &  N =? 6 a  J +  $= 6 = fQ = + +.'  .    X9   Œ H N(Xanthium pensylvanicum) Œ.' $= fQ + 6 X9   6 =?  $D'     N :H +  (Amaranthus retroflexus) \$CB '  ( halopense) + >=.Z    6 = :H  6? :Z$' &$ d +Z   d e . $   + >=.Z $F    &   a , (P< 0/05) . $F     $ d Œ.' 9 6 =? :Z$' .. &$ Z  .7  E7 (1384 x8 ' $< ) 6$ + . + = 12 1 =?  ..0   6 =   u1  4 a $[ + a . = d x8 $C  8 &$ d  $< 4  =.0  8 &$':Z  Œ.' 9 6  + >=.Z    :H   :Z$' &$ d +Z   d =? =.0  I$Z   $= 6 =f Q &$':< ^X      .. \$CB ' 9 6  :H      E7    1  X9    6 =? +   ' Ne $ J +   .C+H  .. Q 4k7  78  E= Z + $r $  & $= 6 =   N  NX9   6 =? Ne $ .C +H  I$Z N =.0  :6Z  Z

* (E-mail: [email protected]) B!0! - B!0#) 0# ! 7 S2! !J d9!  0@ 728 0 62! - B!0! - B! 9 h J ' w90> ;%%<) A2? 345 7>0 - ** 1387  2  10  

+ a 4 \2 hE!  h  j ;' > B!0! 1863 &2  > L$! w90> !'E \ 2 "0 > f! v!0Z! 04 4 W T   w90> cE 1351 &2  9 B!0!    6E8 9  "0 7 ! B> n0@! .(19  14) 0>7 02 d J z2') B! 9 B62! L>C8) 0#  L!  !  86A4 w90> W 6= "\! w90> !'E \ 2 728 74@ 4 >  ;IJ 720> ! 9 ': KaXZ  w90> 7$'_I  KIJ B!0! ! ' •E ! KIJ L! .(2) 0@ '9   > B4@ 02  (B6A   ) w90> f! KIJ L06# 0q &     7d90I :'@ @ .(19) 47 !! 'E "0 kj'a . >7 B!0! & 7 !'9 ")   79 v'2 yXA) & B4@ (2) B > !! 9 W 6= 7 !'9  w90> !'E \ 2 v'2 yXA) & B4@  (14) "S2! ;' > 86A4 cE  02 4B 6A  cn " & ‚\ 3\ & 0@ 0 79 43 hE!  h  j hC >  ' B!'8T > (19) 8 8@  8C! /! 8> /! .(16) 97 0‡2 T hE!   9\> 7I0a w90> !'E \2 "0 H# 4B > 0> ST Chilo spp. W 6= 4 9'@ !'E \2 "0 B > B4@ L06# . 9!  9 ! cE  "0@ 4 B6A>) 02 4B 6A  Compositae Poaceae 4 !'9E ! w90> L! 897 0‡2 96A>) ' K$ > Sparganiaceae Typhaceae Amarantaceae %0IJ YZ8 V F!  84 ! B'8 ) Kaq Poaceae !'9E  >7 Cyperaceae  ! B9 ;%%<) .(7) K2!   /!@ C. suppressalis !0> B> @ ! a) L06>  34  4; ! 4'>0 B!  3!I! .(8) ! ! H# h !'T ! B> @ gJ  LŒ)0 ! %  7# 3%9 ;IJ B> B4@ B'n 'Z > .(23) 8> 7 4!'E \ 2  ' B!1@ B6A  Ka: %>  79!1@B 6A  7!1F 06A> 9  B> @  gJ 'X 4 B'9 L06# !1$  9! ;IJ 4j  ' Š%$! `T> V28 9 %r8  w90> !'E \2 "0 79!1@B 6A  .'7 Chilo 4 9'@ 02  C. partellus 4BJ 728 Lq )  720> B! 9 9 7r< z!0 0@! 76 K2! 7$  L!  B!1@ B6A  04 4W T &068 !0> K$  KIJ ‚'I z!0   > g' r K0 V$\  KIJ Ka: 34 K#: .(21  3) 47 !! 7@ 9 > ' .(24) '  90> ;IJ 7%G ) &  ! B6A  w90> !'E \ 2 "0

136 1387  2  10  

<  . hE!  …\! 04 4 W T 'u8 L! !0> .   04 4W T K4! > :')> …r\ ! M    …r\ \'Z  9 !  Xanthium ) ‚') h  w90> f! !0\ 7C62S 4 A hE! 7Iq! 4^0 > ‚\ (pensylvanicum; Compositeae h%68 d J > ;_= KXt >  6I0@  (Sorghum halopense; Gramineae) \2 L6IC ! M d J  . 9  Amaranthus retroflexus; ) [0E• ) #9J  ':' 4j ! a) 04 4W T 4 B'9 B!'8T > (Amaranthacea 9@! : 'Z > 4) ! c 04 !0>  / 9  w90> !'E \2 "0 79!1@B 6A  ! h 4 ! B  . 0@ KXt B62! YZ8 V F!  #9J …2 7@ 8 !0 !0> 9 '9 YZ8 h  W 6= 4)  1384 &2   7472 0> B! 9 ! G62! > B> @ f'9  !0> 9'9 () "0 4j Ka: H !0) ;!0O) > r>! h  4e' > }0Z V$\   SAS !I! "09 B!1@B 6A  B> 2  w90> !'E \ 2 9 4L d9 .   J h <)   ) 7I_) 3%9 7>! !0> .(19  14) KI0@ " 9! ‚'I B' J 9  LC9! 8 ! 8n B' J [2!0> 4j Ka: 74'X9! ;92'9  H \! .(20) 9   8> 0@  A% LSD S 2 62) K H \! 2 B!1@B 6A  w90> ;%%<) A2? h J) KB (0#Ho\ i*  e S 0d84J 62) ! ‡4'  (v!0Z! 7 !'9   !0> 9'9 ()  %r8 40O6 0t! ! !0> 9'9 .  6I0@ 0u9  (0#Ho \ j ! a) 0> (04 W T) B!1@B 6A  B>   [0E• )  ‚\ ‚') 04 4W T 4j H !0) ;G) .(P< 0/05) '> !78 a 1384/7/12 () !  7d6G4 'Z > w90> f! H \! 2  w90> !'E \2 "0 B!1@B 6A   .  " 9! ( 6G4 12 ; >) 1384/9/29 7$! (h J w90> A2? ) KB (S 2) K w8 YZ8 ! c 04   !0> 9'9 () 04 .(P< 0/05) '> !7 8a (S 0d84J) ‡4'    (06 7 692 50 × 50) ! 9! K>'9  KB  4 H \!  j H !0) L06>  ‚\ ‚')) 04 4W T  " 9! w90> f! .(1 hC) '> ‡4' !0> 9'9 4 hE!  ':' ([0E• )

137 1387  2  10  

a a 1.32

1.29

� 1.32 � � � �

� 1.29 � � d � e t � 1.26 � c �

e b l l � o e �

c 1.23 1.19 a � f v � o r � a r l �

e 1.2 b � m � � u

� 1.17 n n � a e �

� 1.14 � M � � 1.11 Mid-Land (Amol) Up-Land Low-Land (Sarokola) (Ahangarkola)

������ ����� ���� �

Sampled regions

+ >=.Z    N :H +  X9   6 =  6 X9   6 =? :Z$' - 1 4 

Fig. 1 . Population density of overwintering larvae on winter host plants in three climates, low-, mid- and up-lands

!0> 9' 9 YZ8 » h>%6 0t! Ld9 A% ‚') @  B!1@ B6A  4j ! a) 4j Ka: 74'X9!  «04 4W T × hC) (P< 0/05) '> 0d B>  ! 06> ! B9 C. suppressalis B!1@B 6A  .(2  K B H \!  04  j H !0) L06> > B!1@ B6A  4j Ka: H !0) j H !0) L0)H  ‚') @  0> ‡4' 'Z > KI 3!I! 7 9! B  K1@ K2 > [0E• ) @   K H \!   (7/12)  0# h!! > N'>0 H !0) L06 .(1 & :) '> !0> 9'9  0E!! > N'>0 H !0) L06> .(3 hC) (P< 0/05) '> (]J 0E!!)

138 1387  2  10  

a 1.34

� 1.34 � � �

� 1.32 � �

� 1.3 � e � b � a f �

v 1.28 o r

� 1.24 r b a � l e �

b 1.26 g

� 1.22 m n � i u r � 1.24 n e t � n n � i a 1.22 e � w � r � M e �

v 1.2 � o � �

� 1.18 � 1.16 Sorghum Amaranthus Xanthium

������

Host

\$CB '  Œ H NŒ.'   + 6 X9   6 =?  :Z$' - 2 4  Fig. 2 . Population density of overwintering larvae on three winter host plants

2.25 a a 2 d a a c bc

� ab �

� 1.75 ab y c t b � a i � s n � 1.5 e � d � l � a � 1.25 v � r a � l 1 � n � a e � 0.75 M 0.5 0.25

0

2 9 6 .3 0 7 4 . 1 .8 5 2 9 .1 .1 .2 8 .1 .1 .2 9 9 .1 . 2 .2 .7 .7 .7 . .8 .8 .8 . . .9 .9 .9 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ���ی� ����� ������

Date of sampling

6$+ . f ; 6 =P  '  :<   + 6 X9   6 =?  $D' - 3 4  Fig. 3 . Population density of overwintering larvae on three winter host plants in different dates samplings

139 1387  2  10  

C. suppressalis 6 =? :Z$' 6 $= 6 =f Q × 6$ + . u1  4 a $[ &F  + a - 1 3 Table 1 - Mean comparison of interaction between sampling regions × weeds on population density of C. suppressalis

* =& F  $= 6 =f Q × :H Means* Weeds × Climate

bc Amaranthus sp. ×   1.264 ± 0.417 Mid-land × Amaranthus sp.

a Xanthium sp. ×   1.389 ± 0.474 Mid-land × Xanthium sp.

bc Sorghum sp. ×   1.255 ± 0.413 Mid-land × Sorghum sp.

ab Amaranthus sp. × + >=.Z 1.300 ± 0.455 Up-land × Amaranthus sp.

a Xanthium sp. × + >=.Z 1.293 ± 0.524 Up-land × Xanthium sp.

bc Sorghum sp. × + >=.Z 1.266 ± 0.458 Up-land × Sorghum sp.

c Amaranthus sp. ×  1.167 ± 0.451 Low-land × Amaranthus sp.

bc Xanthium sp. ×  1.229 ± 0.495 Low-land × Xanthium sp.

bc Sorghum sp. ×  1.182 ± 0.510 Low-land × Sorghum sp. * .(P< 0.01)    + d $ ^$ 6 6 =& F   ' - * - Means with various letters have significant difference (P< 0.01).

D4 BD> ! 0D) …2 WZ ': BC ! 0 ! H !0D) L06D> 345 L! w69 [2!0> D%r8  C. suppressalis !0D> B!1@B 6A  K2 > ‡4'  K B 4 H \!  j  hDD J YZDD8 DD> DDA%  (S DD2) KDD 'DD KDD HDD \! DDC8! DD> DD:')> . DD J LD! L6I0D@ 0Du9 > . 97 B> ! S 0d84J (S 2 62) 345 L!  !0> 9'9  zD%I YD%<) LD!  !0> 9'9 6C9 D> DA%  0D) f'D86 74D@ 3' !! 02  K2!   " 9! B!1@ B6A  B> 2 L! !1$ K2! '> ‡4'  K B 4 H \!

140 1387  2  10  

D ! D J KD2 D> 4 H \! 02 ! 0)L K  ! 06D> K H \!  #9J f'8) 4 B> BAC  K>t 9 YZ8 ") !0> '> 69 !0DD\ 7DD20> 'DD KDD2! 'DD> 0DDd HDD \!  KD BD D4 HD \! KD2! LC  KA9 D ! 'D: D9 BDC ! LD! !1D$  9! 6I0d9  . 8D> j H !0) L0)L !! ‡4' B!1@ B6A  4j ! ! u S h>\  D4j KDa: 7D9!!0I B'> L & 04 7D9 0Du9) BD> BD4@ 02 K H \!  ; 9 > A> ‡4' YZ8  4!'E \2 ! (0DDF  "SD2! yXDDA) &DD v'DD2 B'D> L ! 79 9!')7 K2!   /!@ LD! 8> 0 g=69! 79!1@ B6A  K#: YDT D>J gJ 02  ‡4' YZ8    D4j ! Da)  ! 7D8a 34D `DT> 0 ! 06 8 ! a) (78 06A>) !$ eE H  D> A%  S 2 K  B!1@ B6A  KD BD HD \! !0D>  4D9 L6D 0  D9 6C9 L! > L8|4 .K2!   0d %r8 "Dd84 KD!0> D89 7 !'DT D> 9!') 7 D4 H \! 4!$ Ka2 '9 ! > H=D  (; X2) " K > !$ h X)  (S 0Dd84J) ! D‡4'  (hD J) KD B .(12  7 3) 0@ N'>0 L  YT 06D> YD%<) LD!  S 2 K > A% ! 06D> ! ‚') @ B!1@ B6A  4j Ka: H !0) B'> 06> 69   K2! '> y:0D) 79!1D@ B6DA  KD#: 0Dd B>  'DD> DD%r8   B!1DD@B 6DDA  DD4j B> c > KIJ 4j 79> y:0) . 9! 06DD> KaDD2 ! 7DD9 DD9!')7 DD kjDD6 ! 7  7CI ;'_E > 9!') 7 †E 7@'DD$J DD 69  ‚'DDI HDD \!  4!$DD •DDD<$ ! .(10) 0DDD@ N'DDD>0 BDDD> DDD@ . DD> 'DD> 7DDT! hDD_I  KDDIJ DD> 06DD>  0D) "0D9 D4 \2 !! ‚') @ cp'$'I0   Da6 D4 !0D> D9'9 [D2!0> L%%<  D> 7D [0E •)  ‚\ @  ! 0)'r\ hD J %r8  h 2  K  ‡4' 4 H \! ;DDX 0) !! kjDD6 ! DD9 7DD •DD<$ ! YZD8  w90D> 4 )'> H !0) 9'9 #b!  0)0t?D D4B' 0 9  0) g' r 7!1F > 7 4H \! 02 ! 06> kj'a ‡4' v0DZ ! .KD2! B!1D@ B6DA  D4j V : D4j KDa: H !0D) 3!I! `T> 0 ! L! KD<) YZD8 VD F!  ‚'D) @ 79!!0I 0d D>  0@ 7 ! ‡4' YZ8  B!1@ B6A  0Dd D@  ! 06D>  ) !0> 9'9 D6X$! .(17) ! KD%>r D9 7D20> L! w69 hD !'T B!'D8T > 89!') 7 ‚'I hj > 7 0D)L 4 KA\ ! w90> 4 \2 …r\ B! D> B!1@ B6A  4j 06> V :  J  0t?D 7 DT D9 ! ‡4' YZ8  4 )'> "D 9! &D 0D4  . D90@ g'DA< ‚'D) @ D4 WD T KD2 D> f! ! 4j ;0:# 7D20> †'_E >  r>! L!  … : ;%%<) LDD  !  DDn0@! . 86DDA9! f!DD DD 0DD4 B!1D@ B6DA  D4 BD> 7 4 7@5 HD \!  B!1D@B 6A  4j H !0) 345

141 1387  2  10  

D 70 ) 60   "'@'2  ;]  VD$: ;DC9 D9!') 7D w90D> !'DE \D2 "0 D%> B! B'> 0)L > r>!  .(9) > 7 . 920> ;Xt! > ! 7#:') BD> 04 4 W T  B!!'E \2 4j D4 BD   BD> @ 9'@ 14 8  LD! KD T D9 %6a LD%%< ;SF > A%   D 7D28 C. partellus !0D> &2 W 6= Bp0D69 jD> 0% ': ! 78a 4 ;G) L! ) K2!   `T> 4 B>  f'8) K2! D D>7 04 4W T > A%  ;SF  D !! 'E '9   > &2 ; ")  KIJ H4!0DDI DD4j !0DD> 0DD) g'D r 7!1DDF …DDX8 D> 6D! &D2  7$!'D6 hA9 L 8n  ! ! BD9 ‚'I L%%< 4 345 .(6) J 7 BD> B4@ ' I  f'8) K2! 7# > .(6) ! D4!'E \D2 hD  ;!0 •0E  ;D'_E 7!'4  gJ z!0 > 4!'E \2 0D4 D4 W T \2 hE!  ':' 4 0G ;D T D9  D%r8 eDE 7  7CI KDG  04 4 W T H !0) h T  > B> KD2! ! B9 ;%%<) .! 7d6A>  D#9J  ':' (Bp069 †'_E >) 7!1F !' D 0D4 D4W D T kj'a C. partellus %>  ‚'I h T  C8! Lq .! 7d6A>  Pennisetum purpereum DDDD89 f!DDDD !1D@0t•) hD ;!0D > 9  4j ;] ! 06D> !1D@H=) K#: ! P. phylum . 86A4 ! BD9 ;%%<) L8|4 .(15) 4 7 y:0) D4j KDa: ;!0DO) ! !0> 9'9 Sesamia calamistis Hampson B!!'E \2 KDDa: H !0DD) DD ! BDD9 B!1DD@ B6DDA  -HDD=) KDD#: Eldana saccharina Walker  D 0# ! B  K1@ > B!1@ B6A  4j Hyparrhenia rufa 0D4 D4WD T > !1@ [DD2!0> . DD >   7DD 3!DDI! 7 DD9! DD ]J DD) Andropogon sp.  Pennisetum polystachion ! Da> w90D> !'DE \2 "0 4j ;%%<) D6C9 .(22) 9'D 7D VD : ;] @ ! 06> KDD2 DD> w90DD> DD43D D ! w90DD> KDD!0> B!!'DE \D2 !1D@H=) y:0) '  V$:  'D9 ;0:D# f!D D 04 4 W T  DC8! ;SDF f!D  04 4 W T  3!DDI! DD4j 7  D) ;0:DD# DD> D:')> ;SDF D> DA%  !1@H=) y:0) HF7 T D 0D4 D4 WD T  D#9J KDa: H !0) ! 0D6 D4 BD> LD!  #9J 4j %> 0Dq 720> w69 > K2! u69! h>\ f! D4j !  70 'Z > . > 7 ;SF BD9 D4 720> L8|4 .(19) ! K%>r 9 9 D h X) 0G > ;]  ;] !'E \2 "0D D4j 7@ 8 !0  ;0:# 9 ! ! 06 B> 04 4W T  0> H\ L!  ! D ]J D)  FJ w90> K!0> ! a> !'E \2 DD4j DD%> LDD8|4 .(6) 'DD> DD    30  D 'Z > ! 'a 02 (' ! hX\)  Baseola fusca !'DE \2  C. partellus /D D9 …D>0 06  j 10 'D> () D !  w8 ! 06 P. purpureum 04 W T

142 1387  2  10  

"D 9! D4 7D20> wD69 > :')> .(1 & :) 'D:   02 h_I f0 >  ! .(13) K2!   B'8 ) w90> f!  04 4 W T   02 4j Ka: H !0)  a6  9!> h !'T KD#: HD# D4 B> B!'8T > #9J ! 9'@ 22  j w8D D)  D> w D) >  6! 7$9 7D28 w90D> !'DE \D2 "0D 79!1@ B6A  D D9'9 D#b! LD%%< . 2 7 9 …>0 06 7 D! B'9 f! hE! 4 3 89  9!   B6D2!  (1354-57) $D2 D#n ;%%<) 7Z w90D> !'E \2 "0 B!1@ B6A  4j %> w90> !'E \2 "0 B!1@ B6A  4j BS@ BD9 Da$r L! w69 .(19  14 13) 8> 7 7DD9!') ; 0DDq VDDA 0>  'DD> e0DD<6 ‚'D) WD 6= 0D4 D4 WD T BD  ! ! B6A  h_I 7Z B! BC 0O)  7: >: 79!1DDD@ B6DDDA  !0DDD> 7DDD<:0) B DDD> > kj'a 4 BC 0O) L! 6X$! .(14) 86A4 !! DD 0 B! DD9 DD%r8  C. suppressalis  ' 7 " 9! 0) LŒr 4 d48 L6I 'u8 D  v1D > V)0) L! > ' 7 g'A< DT hE! z!0 7a\!'  ;0:# L!  ! '> 04 W T Ka: 34 h\! L8|4 . > 7 06> ;  0@ 7 TA 9 34 62!  76X€ w69 kj6 ! w90> f! D4 BDC L0D6# D D9'9 /!@ B! "0DD &! hDDA9 DD40DDVD D KDDa: H !0DD) D 8D> 7D 0D4 D4 W T 79!1@ B6A  DC8! D> :')> .0@ 7 h w90> !'E \2 LD!  86A4 "09 KI>  7$E') \2 !! KDD >\ Chilo M8DD: DD4!'E \ DD2 DD4j 7D9 ‚D\ v'D2 yXDA) & B4@ r>! ! 74D)' KIDA D> 7D: D>: D ;0:# ! 0Dd ! Da)  [0DE•) ‚') "S2!  79j'DDZ KIDDA 7DDZ BDDC ! !1DD$  DD9! y:0D) ! D%r8 f'D9 VDA 0> 0D4 4 W T  YZDD8  ‚'DD) BDD4@  79!1DD@B 6DDA  . 8>7 !'E0> 06> B 'D9 " Da VD)0) L! > 9! 9 ! K2 cD LD> ! 7D8a  J 4 ;G) ': KDIJ KDa: &068  f!  4 B> 4H  \!  (Amaranthus sp. 0u9) B> @ v0DZ ! .(1) 'D> D4!'E !1@0t•) 7I > gJ z!0 0t•)  84 B9 !0> 9'9 W 6= D ! `T> V28 4 d48 ': " T 0d DDD4j KDDDa: H !0DDD)  7!'DDD4  7DDaXZ B8DD DD  0DDt! 0DD>  DD ;DDG ) H !0D) . D>7 C. suppressalis B!1@B 6A  "j .(12) 'D 7D W 6= B@ 90 †'_E > 2 04  (Sorghum sp.) ‚\ @  4j KDa: h Da) 0D> SDT D K2! yq') > vS6DDE!  DD> 7DD B!DD L0DD)L DD HDD \! [0DE •) ‚') 0u9) B!1@ B6A  4 B> D9@ D2 D4 H \!  '> @ L> ! 78a D K2! 7# > (04 4 W T 0d 9  ‚\ DA%  ‚\ @ V)0) L! > ! 9 ':  YT H= 89  ; T 02 " 9! !0DD> 0DD6 KDD4! !! 0DDd DD@  DD> D) D9!')7 D D9 B6A     L  g\0F D> 7D w90D> !'DE \D2 "0D 79!1@ B6A 

143 1387  2  10  

D#> z2!!  w90> 9 ! hX\  ! K!0> hD_I  KDIJ KDa: 34D D> D .0@ ;' DC8! D> D:')> D6X$! . 0D@ 0D 8 a> 7T! ! DDa> 'DD &DD B!C$DD VDD F! 0DD !  H  $ d' †_6E! ! K > ! !$ w90> K!0> D ! 7 SD2! !J  dD9! ! 2L >  LD  YT H= ' 7 ') !1$  84 7 B! DD9 w90DD> ;DD%%<) DDA2?   0#DD hDX\  w90D> K!0> ! a> - 1 h  0  .0@7 79! \ ! DDa> - 2  oDD hDD!!  !DD KDD !

References

1 - Berger A (1993) Larval migration in the Nzoia district of Kenya. Environ. Biosafety Res.

stemborer Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: 3: 159-168.

Pyralidae). Dissertation Swedish University of 7 - Kfir R, Overholt WA, Khan Z and Polaszek A

Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. 80 pp. (2002) Biology and management of

2 - Ebert G (1972) Chilo suppressalis Walker the economically important Lepidopteran cereal

new pest in injury pest fauna of Iran, Journal of stem borers in Africa. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:

Iran Plant Pest& Disease Institute 35: 1-13. 701-731.

3 - Harris KM (1990) Keynote address. Bioecology 8 - Khan ZR, Litsinger JA, Barrion AT, Villanueva

of Chilo species. Science Appl. 11(4/5): FFD, Fernandez NJ and Taylor LD (1991)

467-477. World bibliography of stem borers 1974-

4 - Heinrichs EA (1994) Biology and management 1990. International Rice Research Institute and

of rice . Wiley Eastern Ltd., IRRI. 779 International Centre of Insect Physiology and

pp. Ecology, 415 pp. 5 - Kanno H (1990) Initiation mechanism of mating 9 - Khan ZR, Pickett JA, van den Berg J, Wadhams behaviour in the rice stem borer, Chilo LJ and Woodock CM (2000) Exploiting

suppressalis Walker. Insect Science Appl. chemical ecology and species diversity

11(4/5): 579-582. stemborer and Striga control for maize and

6 - Kanya JI, Ngi-Song AJ, Setamou MF, Overholt sorghum in Africa. Pest Manag. 12: 221-224.

W, Ochora J and Osir EO (2004) Diversity of 10 - Magbanua JM, Demayo CG and Angeles AT

alternative hosts of maize stemborers in Trans- (1995) Biology of a local population of the

striped stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker)

144 1387  2  10  

(Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and evaluation of its 16 - Ofomata VC, Overholt WA and Egwuatu RI

responses to different rice types and Bacillus (1999) Diapause termination of Chilo partellus

thuringiensis formulations. Philippines (Swinhoe) and Chilo orichalcociliellus Strand

Entomol. 9(5): 479-522. (Lep.: Pyralidae). Insect Science Appl. 19: 187-

11 - Midega CAO, Ogol CKPO and Overholt WA 91.

(2005) Life tables, key factor analysis and 17 - Oulomi-Sadeghi H, Kharazi-Pakdel A and

density relations of natural populations of the Jafari ME (1980) Ecological investigate and

spotted maize stemborer, Chilo partellus effect of pathogenic micro-organisms on Chilo

(Lepidoptera: ), under different suppressalis Walker in North Iran, College of

cropping systems at the Kenyan coast. Agriculture, Tehran University Publications,

International J. Tropical Insect Science 25(2): 105 pp.

86-95. 18 - Price PW (1997) Insect Ecology. John Wiley &

12 - Minja EM (1990) Management of Chilo spp. Sons. 607 pp.

infesting cereals in Eastern Africa. Insect 19 - Rezvani N and Shahosseini J (1976) Study on

Science Applic. 11: 489-499. ecology of Chilo suppressalis Walker in East

13 - Mostofipour P, Al-Hoseini H, Tavana M. and Mazandaran province. Journal of Iran Plant Pest

Moslemi H (1995) Some biological and & Disease Institute 43: 1-38.

ecological aspects of rice stem borer (Chilo 20 - SAS Institute (2000) SAS/STAT User's Guide,

suppressalis) in Mazandaran province. release version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, North

Proceedings of 12th Iranian Plant Protection Carolina.

Congress, p. 80. 21 - Scheltes P (1978) The condition of the host

14 - Mousavi M (1979) Chilo suppressalis Walker plant during aestivation-diapause of the stalk in Guilan province. Journal of Iran Plant Pest & borers Chilo partellus and Chilo Disease Institute 47: 179-197. orichalcociliella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in

15 - Ndemah RS, Gounou S and Schulthess F (2002) Kenya. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24: 679-688.

The role of wild grasses in the management of 22 - Setamou M, Schulthess F, Bosque-Perez NA

lepidopterous stemborers on maize in the humid and Thomas-Odjo A (1993) Effect of plant

tropics of western Africa. Bull. Entomol. nitrogen and silica on the bionomics of Sesamia

Research 92: 507-519. calamistis Hampson (Lep.: Noctuidae). Bulletin

Entomol. Research 83: 405-11.

145 1387  2  10  

23 - Usua EJ (1973) Induction of diapause in the 24 - Van den Berg J, Nur AF and Polaszek A (1998)

maize stem borer, Busseola fusca. Entomol. Cultural control. In: Polaszek, A. (Ed.). African

Exp. Appl. 16: 322-328. cereal stem borers: Economic importance,

, natural enemies and control.

Wallingford, UK: CABI. 530 pp.

146 Journal of Agriculture, Vol. 10, No. 2, Autumn 2008

Population density of overwintering larvae of Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on host weeds in Mazandaran province

* ** H. Ghahari and M. Tabari

Abstract

Striped rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) is one of the major

pests in north part of Iran which causes serious damage. The last larval instar overwinters in

the stem of weeds around the fields. Regarding the importance of weeds as overwintering

habitat, population density of larvae was studied in three areas; low-, mid-, and up-lands of

Mazandaran province and also on three host weeds: X anthium pensylvanicum, Sorghum

halopense, and Amaranthus retroflexus. The results imply on the highest density of larvae in the

mid- and up-lands areas and its preference to locate in X. pensylvanicum for overwintering.

There was no significant difference between the two other hosts. Results of population

fluctuation showed that it had a low increasing of population from October to December;

therefore the lowest density was observed in early October and the highest in late December.

Results of interaction effect of area × hosts on population density indicated that the highest

density located on X. pensylvanicum in the mid- and up-lands areas, and the lowest density on A.

retroflexus in low-land part. Based on the results, removing the most important weed which are overwintering habitat for larve from around the rice fields will be resulted to increasing the larval mortality through winter, and therefore decreasing pest population density in crop

season.

Key words: Chilo suppressalis, Mazandaran, Overwintering larvae, Population density, Weeds

* - Assistant Professor of Entomology, Department of Agriculture, Shahre-Rey Islamic Azad University,

Tehran - Iran (E-mail: [email protected])

** - Research Instructor, Amol Rice Research Institute, Mazandaran - Iran