DOCSLIB.ORG

Landing Spacecraft on Mars and Other Planets: an Opportunity to Apply Introductory Physics Paul Withers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landing Spacecraft on Mars and Other Planets: an Opportunity to Apply Introductory Physics Paul Withers Landing spacecraft on Mars and other planets: An opportunity to apply introductory physics Paul Withers Citation: Am. J. Phys. 81, 565 (2013); doi: 10.1119/1.4811215 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4811215 View Table of Contents: http://ajp.aapt.org/resource/1/AJPIAS/v81/i8 Published by the American Association of Physics Teachers Additional information on Am. J. Phys. Journal Homepage: http://ajp.aapt.org/ Journal Information: http://ajp.aapt.org/about/about_the_journal Top downloads: http://ajp.aapt.org/most_downloaded Information for Authors: http://ajp.dickinson.edu/Contributors/contGenInfo.html Downloaded 19 Jul 2013 to 128.197.73.19. Redistribution subject to AAPT license or copyright; see http://ajp.aapt.org/authors/copyright_permission Landing spacecraft on Mars and other planets: An opportunity to apply introductory physics Paul Withersa) Astronomy Department, Boston University, 725 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 (Received 3 January 2012; accepted 31 May 2013) The Curiosity rover safely landed on Mars after “seven minutes of terror” passing through the Martian atmosphere. In order to land safely, Curiosity had to decelerate from speeds of several kilometers per second and reach zero speed exactly upon touching down on the surface. This was accomplished by a combination of atmospheric drag on the enclosed spacecraft during the initial hypersonic entry, deployment of a large parachute, and retrorockets. Here, we use the familiar concepts of introductory physics to explain why all three of these factors were necessary to ensure a safe landing. In particular, we analyze the initial deceleration of a spacecraft at high altitudes, its impact speed if a parachute is not used, its impact speed if a parachute is used, and the duration of its descent on a parachute, using examples from Curiosity and other missions. VC 2013 American Association of Physics Teachers. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4811215] I. INTRODUCTION the spacecraft per unit time, is qAv2. This is the aerodynamic force acting on the spacecraft, a result that is surprisingly The fiery entry of a spacecraft into a planetary atmos- accurate. Even with sophisticated numerical simulations, the phere—whether the return of astronauts to Earth, the landing aerodynamic force on a spacecraft is typically within a few of Curiosity on Mars (Fig. 1), or the descent of Huygens to tens of percent of qAv2. Neglecting the effects of gravity on Titan’s surface—attracts immense public interest. It also the spacecraft (mass m), which is reasonable in the initial offers an opportunity to enliven an introductory physics stages of atmospheric entry, gives the drag equation class, since many fundamental aspects of the behavior of such spacecraft can readily be explained by familiar physical dv m ¼qAv2: (1) principles. dt Here, we analyze the initial deceleration of a spacecraft at high altitudes (Sec. II), its impact speed if a parachute is not Balancing the forces acting vertically on a small parcel of used (Sec. III), its impact speed if a parachute is used (Sec. gas in the background atmosphere leads to IV), and the duration of its descent on a parachute (Sec. V). pðzÞ¼pðz þ DzÞþqgDz, where p is the atmospheric pres- Although the concepts used in this article are commonly dis- sure, z is the altitude, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. cussed in introductory physics classes, we note that the math- This consideration of forces, which is underpinned by the ematics is at a slightly higher level. principle of conservation of momentum, leads to the equa- tion of hydrostatic equilibrium, dp=dz ¼qg. For an iso- II. INITIAL DECELERATION thermal ideal gas in which the pressure is proportional to the density, both pressure and density decrease exponentially Spacecraft enter atmospheres at speeds comparable to with increasing altitude: q ¼ qs expðz=HÞ, where qs is the orbital speeds. In some instances, such as the return of astro- density at the surface and H is the atmospheric scale height; nauts from the space station, this means the speed of a low- this result can be used to eliminate q from Eq. (1). altitude orbit about the planet in question. In other cases, If the spacecraft travels at an angle / from the vertical, such as the Curiosity rover of the Mars Science Laboratory 1 then a pair of first-order differential equations governs mission, this means the speed at aphelion of an elliptical changes in z and v with time: heliocentric orbit that has its perihelion at Earth and its aphe- lion at the planet in question (known as a Hohmann transfer orbit). The two types of entry speeds can be calculated as a demonstration of Kepler’s laws of orbital motion and Newton’s law of gravity.2 Typical values are several kilo- meters per second, much greater than the speed of sound in planetary atmospheres.3 A spacecraft entering a planetary atmosphere at super- sonic speed decelerates due to atmospheric drag.4 Momentum is transferred from the spacecraft to the atmos- phere at a rate that can be estimated from the principle of conservation of momentum. The spacecraft of area A travel- ing at speed v sweeps through a volume AvDt of atmospheric gas in time Dt. The mass of this amount of air is qAvDt, where q is the local atmospheric mass density. Assuming that this amount of air is accelerated to the same speed as the 2 spacecraft, its momentum is qAv Dt. The momentum gained Fig. 1. Artist’s conception of the entry of Curiosity into the atmosphere of by the atmosphere per unit time, equivalent to that lost by Mars. NASA/JPL-Caltech image PIA 14835. 565 Am. J. Phys. 81 (8), August 2013 http://aapt.org/ajp VC 2013 American Association of Physics Teachers 565 Downloaded 19 Jul 2013 to 128.197.73.19. Redistribution subject to AAPT license or copyright; see http://ajp.aapt.org/authors/copyright_permission dv Àq Av2 spacecraft is sufficient to ensure a safe landing speed upon ¼ s expðz=HÞ; (2) dt m reaching the surface. We again neglect gravity. Combining Eqs. (2) and (3), we have dz ¼v cos /: (3) dv q Av dt ¼ s expðz=HÞ; (6) dz m cos / At the very first stages of atmospheric entry, when densities 5 and drag forces are very small, v is effectively constant. In and after integration this becomes such circumstances, the altitude satisfies ½qðzÞquHA v lnðv=vuÞ¼ : (7) z ¼ zu À ðt À tuÞ cos /; (4) m cos / where zu is the altitude at the top of the atmosphere when Here qu is the density at the top of the atmosphere, where the t ¼ tu. Using this result in Eq. (2) then leads to corresponding speed is vu. Because the location of “the top” of the atmosphere is arbitrary we can make q arbitrarily dv Àq Av2 u ¼ s expðz =HÞ exp½vðt À t Þ cos /=H: small, which leads to dt m u u (5) ÀqðzÞHA ÀpðzÞA lnðv=v Þ¼ ¼ : (8) u m cos / mg cos / The term in large square brackets is constant for the present assumptions, so the aerodynamic acceleration measured by Because atmospheric pressures and planetary gravities are an onboard accelerometer increases exponentially with time. more commonly used and tabulated than are densities and Figure 2 illustrates that this result held for the arrival of the scale heights, here we have replaced the atmospheric density 6 Pathfinder spacecraft at Mars during the interval 40–80 s af- by the pressure p using p ¼ qgH. Note that MA qsHA ¼ ter atmospheric entry, while the acceleration changed by psA=g is the mass of a vertical atmospheric column of area 7 more than four orders of magnitude. Determination of the A, and MA=cos / is the total mass of the atmospheric gas characteristic timescale for changes in acceleration, swept up by the spacecraft. 3 2 H=ðv cos /Þ, provides a way to estimate the atmospheric For the Curiosity landing, ps ¼ 10 Pa, g ¼ 3.7 m/s , 2 scale height H. For Pathfinder, the acceleration increases by A ¼ 16 m , m ¼ 2400 kg, and vu ¼ 6km=s. A vertical entry four orders of magnitude over 40 s, equivalent to a character- (/ ¼ 0) implies v ¼ 0:2vu ¼ 1:2km=s, while an angled entry istic timescale of 4 s. For the entry speed of 7.4 km/s and with / ¼ 60 implies a much slower speed, despite cos / / ¼ 75:6, the implied scale height is 8 km, which is consist- only changing from 1 to 0.5. This angled entry implies 8 ent with other observations. The brevity of this characteris- v ¼ 0:03vu ¼ 180 m=s, which is still 400 mph, far in excess tic timescale indicates that conditions during atmospheric of any plausible safe landing speed. Since the planet is entry can change very rapidly, which makes the safe passage round, the entry angle / cannot be increased all the way to of spacecraft through planetary atmospheres a formidable 90; at some point, the descending trajectory will become engineering challenge. merely a grazing trajectory and the spacecraft will skip out of the atmosphere and return to space.9 Thus, it is clear that III. IMPACT SPEED WITHOUT A PARACHUTE additional means of deceleration are required to ensure a safe landing speed for Curiosity, as described in Sec. IV. The intense heating that occurs during supersonic flight Figure 3 uses Eq. (8) to show how speed depends on alti- requires that a spacecraft be protected by a heat shield. Let tude for a range of possible values of MA=ðm cos /Þ.Asa us consider whether deceleration due to drag on the enclosed spacecraft descends its speed barely changes until MA= cos / > 0:1, and once MA= cos / > 1 the speed decreases precipitously.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Industry at the Edge of Space Other Springer-Praxis Books of Related Interest by Erik Seedhouse
    IndustryIndustry atat thethe EdgeEdge ofof SpaceSpace ERIK SEEDHOUSE S u b o r b i t a l Industry at the Edge of Space Other Springer-Praxis books of related interest by Erik Seedhouse Tourists in Space: A Practical Guide 2008 ISBN: 978-0-387-74643-2 Lunar Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon 2008 ISBN: 978-0-387-09746-6 Martian Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on Mars 2009 ISBN: 978-0-387-98190-1 The New Space Race: China vs. the United States 2009 ISBN: 978-1-4419-0879-7 Prepare for Launch: The Astronaut Training Process 2010 ISBN: 978-1-4419-1349-4 Ocean Outpost: The Future of Humans Living Underwater 2010 ISBN: 978-1-4419-6356-7 Trailblazing Medicine: Sustaining Explorers During Interplanetary Missions 2011 ISBN: 978-1-4419-7828-8 Interplanetary Outpost: The Human and Technological Challenges of Exploring the Outer Planets 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4419-9747-0 Astronauts for Hire: The Emergence of a Commercial Astronaut Corps 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4614-0519-1 Pulling G: Human Responses to High and Low Gravity 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4614-3029-2 SpaceX: Making Commercial Spacefl ight a Reality 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4614-5513-4 E r i k S e e d h o u s e Suborbital Industry at the Edge of Space Dr Erik Seedhouse, M.Med.Sc., Ph.D., FBIS Milton Ontario Canada SPRINGER-PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION ISBN 978-3-319-03484-3 ISBN 978-3-319-03485-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03485-0 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013956603 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas Launch System Mission Planner's Guide, Atlas V Addendum
    ATLAS Atlas Launch System Mission Planner’s Guide, Atlas V Addendum FOREWORD This Atlas V Addendum supplements the current version of the Atlas Launch System Mission Plan- ner’s Guide (AMPG) and presents the initial vehicle capabilities for the newly available Atlas V launch system. Atlas V’s multiple vehicle configurations and performance levels can provide the optimum match for a range of customer requirements at the lowest cost. The performance data are presented in sufficient detail for preliminary assessment of the Atlas V vehicle family for your missions. This guide, in combination with the AMPG, includes essential technical and programmatic data for preliminary mission planning and spacecraft design. Interface data are in sufficient detail to assess a first-order compatibility. This guide contains current information on Lockheed Martin’s plans for Atlas V launch services. It is subject to change as Atlas V development progresses, and will be revised peri- odically. Potential users of Atlas V launch service are encouraged to contact the offices listed below to obtain the latest technical and program status information for the Atlas V development. For technical and business development inquiries, contact: COMMERCIAL BUSINESS U.S. GOVERNMENT INQUIRIES BUSINESS INQUIRIES Telephone: (691) 645-6400 Telephone: (303) 977-5250 Fax: (619) 645-6500 Fax: (303) 971-2472 Postal Address: Postal Address: International Launch Services, Inc. Commercial Launch Services, Inc. P.O. Box 124670 P.O. Box 179 San Diego, CA 92112-4670 Denver, CO 80201 Street Address: Street Address: International Launch Services, Inc. Commercial Launch Services, Inc. 101 West Broadway P.O. Box 179 Suite 2000 MS DC1400 San Diego, CA 92101 12999 Deer Creek Canyon Road Littleton, CO 80127-5146 A current version of this document can be found, in electronic form, on the Internet at: http://www.ilslaunch.com ii ATLAS LAUNCH SYSTEM MISSION PLANNER’S GUIDE ATLAS V ADDENDUM (AVMPG) REVISIONS Revision Date Rev No.
    [Show full text]
  • Orion Capsule Launch Abort System Analysis
    Orion Capsule Launch Abort System Analysis Assignment 2 AE 4802 Spring 2016 – Digital Design and Manufacturing Georgia Institute of Technology Authors: Tyler Scogin Michel Lacerda Jordan Marshall Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Mission Profile ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Literature Review ........................................................................................................................ 8 2. Conceptual Design ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Design Process ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Vehicle Performance Characteristics ......................................................................................... 15 2.3 Vehicle/Sub-Component Sizing ................................................................................................. 15 3. Vehicle 3D Model in CATIA ................................................................................................................ 22 3.1 3D Modeling Roles and Responsibilities: .................................................................................. 22 3.2 Design Parameters and Relations:............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 19700031865.Pdf
    1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA TM X-2075 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date EFFECTOFRETROROCKETCANTANGLEON October 1970 6. Performing Organization Code GROUND EROSION - A SCALED VIKING STUDY 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Leonard V. Clark L-7376 IO. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 124-08-29-01 NASA Langley Research Center 11. Contract or Grant No. Hampton, Va. 23365 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Technical Memorandum National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20546 ~ 16. Abstract An experimental study was conducted at the Langley Research Center to evaluate the relative merits of canting the Viking lander retrorockets toward the spacecraft center line as a means of reducing rocket-exhaust disturbance of the surface of Mars. This paper describes the experimental study, outlines the scaling scheme of the tests, and briefly dis- cusses significant data trends. The results of this exploratory study indicate that canting of the retrorockets toward the center of the spacecraft does reduce ground erosion of the landing site from that produced by a lander configuration with downward-directed retro- rockets. Obviously, before canting the Viking lander retrorockets, it would be necessary to weigh this reduction in surface disturbance against the attendant loss of thrust due to canting. 17. Key Words (Suggested by Author(s) ) 18. Distribution Statement Jet impingement Unclassified - Unlimited Rocket-exhaust effects 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No.
    [Show full text]
  • Reusable Rocket Upper Stage Development of a Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation Tool to Determine the Feasibility of Upper Stage Reusability L
    Reusable Rocket Upper Stage Development of a Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation Tool to Determine the Feasibility of Upper Stage Reusability L. Pepermans Technische Universiteit Delft Reusable Rocket Upper Stage Development of a Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation Tool to Determine the Feasibility of Upper Stage Reusability by L. Pepermans to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Wednesday October 30, 2019 at 14:30 AM. Student number: 4144538 Project duration: September 1, 2018 – October 30, 2019 Thesis committee: Ir. B.T.C Zandbergen , TU Delft, supervisor Prof. E.K.A Gill, TU Delft Dr.ir. D. Dirkx, TU Delft This thesis is confidential and cannot be made public until October 30, 2019. An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Cover image: S-IVB upper stage of Skylab 3 mission in orbit [23] Preface Before you lies my thesis to graduate from Delft University of Technology on the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of reusable upper stages. During the accompanying literature study, it was determined that the technology readiness level is sufficiently high for upper stage reusability. However, it was unsure whether a cost-effective system could be build. I have been interested in the field of Entry, Descent, and Landing ever since I joined the Capsule Team of Delft Aerospace Rocket Engineering (DARE). During my time within the team, it split up in the Structures Team and Recovery Team. In September 2016, I became Chief Recovery for the Stratos III student-built sounding rocket. During this time, I realised that there was a lack of fundamental knowledge in aerodynamic decelerators within DARE.
    [Show full text]
  • Reusable Stage Concepts Design Tool
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2019-421 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND AEROSPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) DOI: ADD DOINUMBER HERE Reusable stage concepts design tool Lars Pepermans?, Barry Zandbergeny ?Delft University of Technology Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS Delft [email protected] yDelft University of Technology Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS Delft Abstract Reusable launch vehicles hold the promise of substantially reducing the cost of access to space. Many different approaches towards realising a reusable rocket exist or are being proposed. This work focuses on the use of an optimisation method for conceptual design of non-winged reusable upper stages, thereby allowing it to take into account landing on land, sea or mid-air retrieval as well as landing the full stage or the engine only. As the optimisation criterion, the ratio of the specific launch cost of the reusable to the expendable version is used. The tool also provides for a Monte Carlo analysis, which allows for investigating the ruggedness of the design solution(s) found. The article will describe the methods implemented in the Conceptual Reusability Design Tool (CRDT) together with the modifications made to ParSim v3, a simulation tool by Delft Aerospace Rocket Engi- neering. Furthermore, it will present the steps taken to verify and validate CRDT. Finally, several example cases are presented based on the Atlas V-Centaur launch vehicle. The cases demonstrate the tools capa- bility of finding optimum and the sensitivity of the found optimum. However, it also shows the optimum when the user disables some Entry Descent and Landing (EDL) options. 1. Introduction To make space more accessible, one can reduce the cost of an orbital launch.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multipurpose Reusable Reentry Satellite
    I I RRS - A MULTIPURPOSE REUSABLE REENTRY SATELLITE I John J. Givens· I and Richard W. Schaupp NASA Ames Research Center I ABSTRACT . This paper descr ibes a low-cost, mul tipurpose Reus­ able Reentry Satellite (RRS) which can carry a variety of I experiments into space, remain in orbit for up to 60 days, return autonomously to Earth and be refurbished for reuse. Potential user applications include life science, commer­ I cial, and others. As presently conceived, the vehicle is a blunt ballis­ I tic entry vehicle with an internal cavity for accommodat­ ing user payloads, including those utilizing the STS Get­ Away Special (GAS) canister. The spacecraft provides payload power, transmits payload data, receives payload I commands, and controls payload cavi ty thermal conditions. A variety of vehicle sizes with base diameters within I the range 38 to 100 in. have been investigated. Based on these investigations, a 64-in. -diameter vehicle has been selected as a baseline for conceptual design studies. This I vehicle weighs 1900 lb and has an overall length of 76 in. It can accommo~ate a payload whioh weighs 450 lb and ocoupies 21 ft . Up to 30 kWhr of lithium battery power is I available for payload use. The results of the studies to date have been very promising. Efforts are oontinuing at NASA Ames Researoh I Center to define system capabilities and requirements while contraoted vehiole study efforts are being initiated. I INTRODUCTION I In recent years user acoess to space has been seriously oonstrained by the lack of low-cost spaceoraft and the availability of launch opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION This Study of Reentry Vehicle (RV)
    INTRODUCTION This study of Reentry Vehicle (RV) systems and their associated operations was conducted for the Department of Transportation/Office of Commercial Space Transportation. The purpose of the study was to investigate and present an overview of reentry vehicle systems and to identify differences in mission requirements and operations. This includes reentry vehicle system background, system design considerations, description of past/present/future reentry systems, and hazards associated with reentry vehicles that attain orbit, reenter, and are recovered. A general literature search that included the OCST data base, NASA, Air Force, and other technical libraries and personal contact with various government or private industry organizations knowledgeable in reentry system vehicles was performed. A reference page is provided at the end of this report. A history of early manned reentry vehicle launches is shown in Appendix I. A listing of some of the agencies and companies found to be most knowledgeable in the reentry vehicle area is provided in Appendix II. The following sections provide more detailed information on reentry system vehicles. A. Background - The development of reentry vehicles began in the late 1950's due to the need for Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency photo reconnaissance of Soviet ICBM sites. NASA has also been involved in the use of reentry vehicles since the early 1960's, including manned space programs Mercury, Gemini and Apollo. The following sections describe the evolution of reentry system development in the United States and foreign countries: 1. Discoverer1 - The Discoverer program was of major importance because it provided a vehicle for testing orbital maneuvering capability and reentry techniques and it played a large role in enabling the first United States manned space flights to be conducted in Project Mercury.
    [Show full text]
  • Vostok Spacecraft Retrofire and Deorbit Systems, December 1963
    DECLASSIFIED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE INTERAGENCY SECURITY CLASSIFICATION APPEALS PANEL, E.O. 13526, SECTION 5.3(b)(3) ISCAP APPEAL NO. 2009-068, document no. 9 DECLASSIFICATION DATE: November 13,2014 )81 VOSTOK SPACECRAFT RETROFIRE AND DEORBff SYSTEMS DECEMBER \963 - TASK 61820 4{3.3.8.3) AiR FO~C~ ~~~S~l~ DEVilOPiiOOT C!NT~~~ ~O~WMA~ AI~ ~0~~~ ~A$f ~H11 ~~ElC@ A:-'rJIOC 63- 6292. 1nh.') ~ · n ..~ ~·.c . :1 , · ,J r. i~ . : 1 . ng w :~ r . v r P• r • Ol.:nlly aJJe :. t .: ~ ih~( (011 · -.U:1 t' ci ; n ;·, ·, ~: : b! c ;; : c .--~ , ·.Lr:.:ld b < fcnvarchd b )• the reClp : f· a1t d . r (· r • L· , ,-. AFMD C: :MDr!::l. i-i<:-·: k-m ·\ n .-\FB. :-.l ~ w !.,ic-x:co 63330 T h: ::- .n :-:'.• v..·.":.t'.f :t b b!" ,:· g.i :.~ ~- o r .:a. l:tr.s resp0n~;b.Lty j u r !>end i ng c- '..1 : i". r: .!\: · rr.~·_ _,_,-;_ (..r ariy P f· :- \ i :\ent tnlell-.gt::nc:C; dc.\.a. tY.rc-ugh -:;. i:- : .:-~ d ·~· t ~- ~l.'cl =.-t. t-d -.: :~ f:}l · g e ;-, rt= (-:l't..:cnon chan n c Is ·J f the 1.:-'. 0 ',b ~-·t-' ; · c€~ < - ~ ~gcn.:-~r~ :; ,: f : }·. .:: \j S· G c ·.. ;e r r.m e n~ 2 \V AR~~ : :·JG T i;_ ·, ::, d o c..L rn e n: r.c.·r. ! 1an~ :. rdo rma Lon affec • ! n g the -: =t1 · c.:-d .l deff-n. :; c c..£ 1(. c· C S. w~r:h · .n t.'ne rnean~ng o i the E:sp1onage J.• <w.
    [Show full text]
  • R-700 MIT's ROLE in PROJECT APOLLO VOLUME I PROJECT
    R-700 MIT’s ROLE IN PROJECT APOLLO FINAL REPORT ON CONTRACTS NAS 9-153 AND NAS 9-4065 VOLUME I PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ABSTRACTS AND BIBLIOGRAPHY edited by James A. Hand OCTOBER 1971 CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS, 02139 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was prepared under DSR Project 55-23890, sponsored by the Manned Spacecraft Center of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The description of project management was prepared by James A. Hand and is based, in large part, upon discussions with Dr. C. Stark Draper, Ralph R. Ragan, David G. Hoag and Lewis E. Larson. Robert C. Millard and William A. Stameris also contributed to this volume. The publication of this document does not constitute approval by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the findings or conclusions contained herein. It is published for the exchange and stimulation of ideas. @ Copyright by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Published by the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Printed in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U. S. A., 1972 ii The title of these volumes, “;LJI’I”s Role in Project Apollo”, provides but a mcdest hint of the enormous range of accomplishments by the staff of this Laboratory on behalf of the Apollo program. Rlanss rush into spaceflight during the 1060s demanded fertile imagination, bold pragmatism, and creative extensions of existing tecnnologies in a myriad of fields, The achievements in guidance and control for space navigation, however, are second to none for their critical importance in the success of this nation’s manned lunar-landing program, for while powerful space vehiclesand rockets provide the environment and thrust necessary for space flight, they are intrinsicaily incapable of controlling or guiding themselves on a mission as complicated and sophisticated as Apollo.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Correct: Critique of All Nasa Mars Weather Data
    MARS CORRECT: CRITIQUE OF ALL NASA MARS WEATHER DATA David Alexander Roffman, PhD, Physics Web site: http://Davidaroffman.com E-mail [email protected] and Barry S. Roffman Lieutenant, United States Coast Guard - Retired Web site: http://MarsCorrect.com/cgi/wp/ E-mail: [email protected] 27 February 2021 ROFFMAN & ROFFMAN Mars Correct: Critique of All NASA Mars Weather Data This Report is dedicated to the memory of our uncle, Eugene Roffman, the first great scientist in our family. When he was 92 years old, on the last day that we saw him alive, he gave us the key to the door hiding one of the great mysteries of the universe. He then asked us to unlock it and reveal to the world what would be found. This father and son work is the fruit of our twelve-year journey to fulfill his request. May it forever distract humanity from the petty squabbles that threaten to destroy our species. ii ROFFMAN & ROFFMAN Mars Correct: Critique of All NASA Mars Weather Data TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents………………………………………………………….. iii List of Illustrations…................................................................................ iv ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………… 1 1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………….......................... 2 1.1 Comparison of Martian and terrestrial dust devils……………..……………………… 5 1.1.1 Geographic Occurrences and the Greenhouse and Thermophoresis Effect……… 5 1.1.2 Seasonal Occurrences and Electrical Properties………………….……………… 6 1.1.3. Size and Shape ………………………………………………………………………….. 6 1.1.4. Diurnal Formation Rate and Lifetime……………………………………………….. 6 1.1.5 Wind Speeds…………………………………………………………………………….. 4 1.1.6 Core Temperature Excursions…………………………………………………………. 6 1.1.7 Dust Particle Size – The Problem of Martian Dust <2 Microns and Wind Speeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Motivations and Preliminary Design for Mid-Air Deployment of a Science Rotorcraft on Mars
    Motivations and Preliminary Design for Mid-Air Deployment of a Science Rotorcraft on Mars Jeff Delaune∗ Jacob Izraelevitz† Evgeniy Sklyanskiy‡ Aaron Schutte§ Abigail Fraeman¶ Valerie Scott‖ Carl Leake∗∗ Erik Ballesteros†† Kim Aaron‡‡ Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91109 Larry A. Young§§ Wayne Johnson¶¶ Shannah Withrow-Maser∗∗∗ Haley Cummings††† Raghav Bhagwat‡‡‡ NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94035 Marcel Veismann§§§ Skylar Wei¶¶¶ Regina Lee17 Luis Pabon Madrid18 Morteza Gharib19 Joel Burdick20 Center for Autonomous Systems and Technologies (CAST), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125 William Rapin21 CNRS, Toulouse, 31400, France Mid-Air Deployment (MAD) of a rotorcraft during Entry, Descent and Landing (EDL) on Mars eliminates the need to carry a propulsion or airbag landing system. This reduces the total mass inside the aeroshell by more than 100 kg and simplifies the aeroshell architecture. MAD’s lighter and simpler design is likely to bring the risk and cost associated with the mission down. Moreover, the lighter entry mass enables landing in the Martian highlands, at elevations inaccessible to current EDL technologies. This paper proposes a novel MAD concept for a Mars helicopter. We suggest a minimum science payload package to perform relevant science in the highlands. A variant of the Ingenuity helicopter is proposed to provide increased deceleration during MAD, and enough lift to fly the science payload in the highlands. We show in simulation that the lighter aeroshell results in a lower terminal velocity (30 m/s) at the end of the parachute phase of the EDL, and at higher altitudes than other approaches.
    [Show full text]