DOCSLIB.ORG

Elenco Ammissibili DECIMO Stralcio

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elenco Ammissibili DECIMO Stralcio DECRETO DEL C.D. n. 36 del 03 agosto 2020 - ALLEGATO 1 O.C.D.P.C. N. 616/2019 - ECCEZIONALI EVENTI METEOROLOGICI VERIFICATISI A PARTIRE DAL GIORNO 12 NOVEMBRE 2019 NEL TERRITORIO DEL COMUNE DI VENEZIA Contributi per l’immediato sostegno alla popolazione – PRIVATI - art. 25, comma 2, lettera c), Decreto legislativo 2 gennaio 2018, n. 1 QUADRO RIEPILOGATIVO SOGGETTI AMMESSI AL CONTRIBUTO – DECIMO STRALCIO – ELENCO DEI CONTRIBUTI LIQUIDABILI A FAVORE DI PRIVATI LEGENDA: − Indennizzi assicurativi quantificati: N=non quantificato − Liquidazione Totale o Parziale del contributo richiesto: P=parziale; T=totale. Rendicontato Liquidazione ammissibile al netto Totale o CONTRIBUTO GENERALITÀ RENDICONTAZIONE Parziale del degli indennizzi contributo EROGABILE (A-B) richiesto Costi effettivamente sostenuti, Indennizzi assicurativi Numeraz. Numero Protocollo Nominativo del dichiarante Indirizzo unità immobiliare interessata documentati, ammissibili alla quantificati elenco domanda (COGNOME – NOME) dall’evento data del Decreto (B) (A) VIA SAN GIOVANNI D'ACRI 3, LIDO, 1 68 ALIANO MAURO € 4.999,50 N € 4.999,50 T € 4.999,50 MALAMOCCO, ALBERONI CANNAREGIO 4161, S. MARCO, 2 119 CAVAGNINI FULVIA € 3.697,90 N € 3.697,90 T € 3.697,90 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO CANNAREGIO 3345/E, S. MARCO, 3 272 FABRIS MONICA € 3.551,00 N € 3.551,00 T € 3.551,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO DORSODURO 1128/A (DORSODURO, S. 4 738 TESSARI MANUELA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 4.033,00 N € 4.033,00 P € 4.033,00 FISOLA) SANTA CROCE 1317, DORSODURO, S. 5 816 CONDOMINIO PALAZZO GIDONI POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 4.028,00 N € 4.028,00 T € 4.028,00 FISOLA PELLESTRINA 614, PELLESTRINA, S. 6 957 BUSETTO DAVIDE € 605,00 N € 605,00 T € 605,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA CASTELLO 5087, S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 7 1018 OMBRELLI ADRIANA € 4.854,00 N € 4.854,00 T € 4.854,00 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO CANNAREGIO 4698, S. MARCO, 8 1091 FASOLATO JACOPO € 4.673,00 N € 4.673,00 P € 4.673,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO CASTELLO 1818, S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 9 1127 GUIDA GIANFRANCO € 364,00 N € 364,00 T € 364,00 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO CANNAREGIO 6125, S. MARCO, 10 1280 MOGLIA MARCOMARTINO € 5.000,00 N € 5.000,00 T € 5.000,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO PELLESTRINA 669 (PELLESTRINA, S. 11 1487 VIANELLO PAOLO € 1.008,50 N € 1.008,50 T € 1.008,50 PIETRO IN VOLTA) SAN MARCO 3652 (S. MARCO, 12 1514 DE MARCO MARINA € 4.382,62 N € 4.382,62 P € 4.382,62 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) CANNAREGIO 2642 (S. MARCO, 13 1574 GANZ PAOLA € 1.528,00 N € 1.528,00 P € 1.528,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) PELLESTRINA 1023/H (PELLESTRINA, S. 14 1794 SCARPA GIACOMINO € 2.640,65 N € 2.640,65 T € 2.640,65 PIETRO IN VOLTA) GIUDECCA 439 (DORSODURO, S. POLO, 15 1821 GAVAGNIN PIERLUIGI € 5.000,00 N € 5.000,00 T € 5.000,00 S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA FISOLA) SANTA CROCE 2306 (DORSODURO, S. 16 1919 BISIACH LUIGI POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 3.974,00 N € 3.974,00 T € 3.974,00 FISOLA) Commissario Delegato ex OCDPC n. 616/2019 Data: 03/08/2020, PG/2020/0002215 DECRETO DEL C.D. n. 36 del 03 agosto 2020 - ALLEGATO 1 CASTELLO 4986 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 17 1945 MINEO CLEMENTINA € 3.795,00 N € 3.795,00 P € 3.795,00 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) SANTA CROCE 914 (DORSODURO, S. 18 2031 CATTELAN CHIARA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 4.994,00 N € 4.994,00 T € 4.994,00 FISOLA) DORSODURO 2647 (DORSODURO, S. 19 2049 CRIVELLARI GIANNI POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 1.100,00 N € 1.100,00 T € 1.100,00 FISOLA) PELLESTRINA 832 (PELLESTRINA, S. 20 2064 SCARPA MAURO € 761,00 N € 761,00 T € 761,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) DORSODURO 3250 (DORSODURO, S. 21 2102 PIEROPAN CARLO POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 744,00 N € 744,00 T € 744,00 FISOLA) CASTELLO 1368 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 22 2122 BOSCOLO NATALINA € 1.335,05 N € 1.335,05 T € 1.335,05 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) CASTELLO 6389 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 23 2172 FALCIERI MARCELLA € 4.620,00 N € 4.620,00 T € 4.620,00 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) DORSODURO 2255 (DORSODURO, S. 24 2173 MOSOLE SARAH POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 453,00 N € 453,00 T € 453,00 FISOLA) PELLESTRINA 1122/L (PELLESTRINA, S. 25 2277 VIAN AUGUSTO € 4.714,00 N € 4.714,00 T € 4.714,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) CASTELLO 618/T (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 26 2304 PISANI SALVATORE € 889,10 N € 889,10 T € 889,10 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) CANNAREGIO 5565 (S. MARCO, 27 2553 RUOCCO VALERIO € 3.169,60 N € 3.169,60 T € 3.169,60 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) SANTA CROCE 910 (DORSODURO, S. 28 2782 GALLICCIOLI MONICA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 2.504,00 N € 2.504,00 T € 2.504,00 FISOLA) SAN POLO 1895/C (DORSODURO, S. 29 2922 COSTANTINI ELISEO POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 2.200,00 N € 2.200,00 T € 2.200,00 FISOLA) FONDAMENTA LORENZO RADI 14/C 30 3022 BOTTARO ALESSANDRO € 5.000,00 N € 5.000,00 T € 5.000,00 (MURANO, S. ERASMO) PELLESTRINA 1122/E (PELLESTRINA, S. 31 3143 DE POLI SILVIA € 5.000,00 N € 5.000,00 T € 5.000,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) CASTELLO 5843 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 32 3206 RUBBINI RAFFAELA € 4.726,32 N € 4.726,32 T € 4.726,32 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) CASTELLO 6478 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 33 3290 BORGATO ALESSANDRO € 2.082,81 N € 2.082,81 T € 2.082,81 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) CASTELLO 1751 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 34 3452 SCARPA ROBERTO € 2.110,00 N € 2.110,00 P € 2.110,00 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) VIA SANDRO GALLO 38/A (LIDO, 35 3836 RACCANELLI VITTORE € 5.000,00 N € 5.000,00 T € 5.000,00 MALAMOCCO, ALBERONI) SAN PIETRO IN VOLTA 221 36 3868 BALLARIN LUCIANO € 1.120,00 N € 1.120,00 P € 1.120,00 (PELLESTRINA, S. PIETRO IN VOLTA) DORSODURO 3498 (DORSODURO, S. 37 3944 ZAMBON GRAZIELLA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 929,69 N € 929,69 P € 929,69 FISOLA) PELLESTRINA 1 (PELLESTRINA, S. PIETRO 38 3964 ROSADA ANNALISA € 1.030,01 N € 1.030,01 T € 1.030,01 IN VOLTA) PELLESTRINA 521 (PELLESTRINA, S. 39 3981 VINCENZO VIANELLO € 1.400,00 N € 1.400,00 P € 1.400,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) Commissario Delegato ex OCDPC n. 616/2019 Data: 03/08/2020, PG/2020/0002215 DECRETO DEL C.D. n. 36 del 03 agosto 2020 - ALLEGATO 1 PELLESTRINA 475 (PELLESTRINA, S. 40 3989 SCARPA VALERIO € 2.506,00 N € 2.506,00 T € 2.506,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) VIA AGOSTINO BARBARIGO 10 (LIDO, 41 4019 BRUSCHI ANGELO € 3.715,50 N € 3.715,50 T € 3.715,50 MALAMOCCO, ALBERONI) CALLE QUIRIZIO DA MURANO 3 42 4171 BOTTARO ELISABETTA € 800,00 N € 800,00 T € 800,00 (MURANO, S. ERASMO) SANTA CROCE 233 (DORSODURO, S. 43 4237 SPINOSA LUIGINA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 4.599,61 N € 4.599,61 T € 4.599,61 FISOLA) CASTELLO 796 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, S. 44 4408 BETTIOL EDDY € 2.400,00 N € 2.400,00 T € 2.400,00 ELENA, CANNAREGIO) CANNAREGIO 3237 (S. MARCO, 45 4604 PICCO NICOLA € 389,00 N € 389,00 T € 389,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) SANTA CROCE 2043 (DORSODURO, S. 46 4639 MARTON MARIA-LUISA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 805,00 N € 805,00 T € 805,00 FISOLA) PELLESTRINA 11 (PELLESTRINA, S. 47 4676 BUSETTO SANDRO € 2.112,00 N € 2.112,00 P € 2.112,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) SANTA CROCE 327 (DORSODURO, S. 48 4718 FASAN ALBERTO POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 4.739,90 N € 4.739,90 T € 4.739,90 FISOLA) PELLESTRINA 255 (PELLESTRINA, S. 49 4848 VIANELLO FRANCESCO € 782,00 N € 782,00 T € 782,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) CANNAREGIO 656 (S. MARCO, 50 5009 CONDOMINIO CASA AMADI € 2.304,00 N € 2.304,00 T € 2.304,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) SAN MAURO 4 (BURANO, MAZZORBO, 51 5164 NOVELLO VITTORINA € 1.600,00 N € 1.600,00 T € 1.600,00 TORCELLO) CANNAREGIO 2187 (S. MARCO, 52 5178 BERTI ROSSANA € 1.194,00 N € 1.194,00 T € 1.194,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) SAN MARCO 2933 (S. MARCO, 53 5250 SANTINI LOREDANA € 5.000,00 N € 5.000,00 T € 5.000,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) PELLESTRINA 629 (PELLESTRINA, S. 54 5251 BIGON DAVIDE € 4.980,00 N € 4.980,00 T € 4.980,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) PELLESTRINA 1034 (PELLESTRINA, S. 55 5541 VIANELLO DANIELE € 744,00 N € 744,00 T € 744,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) 56 5651 PENZO MARISA CALLE VOLPI 18 (MURANO, S. ERASMO) € 4.175,80 N € 4.175,80 P € 4.175,80 CASTELLO 2967 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 57 6049 CAPUZZO GIOVANNA-KATIA € 816,00 N € 816,00 T € 816,00 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) CASTELLO 6507 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 58 6315 BRUNAZZO CATERINA € 299,99 N € 299,99 T € 299,99 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) PELLESTRINA 79 (PELLESTRINA, S. 59 6461 VIANELLO ELLERO € 1.842,00 N € 1.842,00 T € 1.842,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) CASTELLO 2730 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 60 6698 BONATO SIMONETTA € 5.000,00 N € 5.000,00 T € 5.000,00 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) PELLESTRINA 1197/G (PELLESTRINA, S. 61 6983 ZENNARO ROSALINO € 3.000,00 N € 3.000,00 P € 3.000,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) PELLESTRINA 354/A (PELLESTRINA, S. 62 6991 VIANELLO ELENA € 3.840,00 N € 3.840,00 P € 3.840,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) PELLESTRINA 1122/F (PELLESTRINA, S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MOSE (EXPERIMENTAL ELECTROMECHANICAL MODULE; ITALIAN: MODULO SPERIMENTALE ELETTROMECCANICO) Overview / Summary of the Initiative
    MOSE (EXPERIMENTAL ELECTROMECHANICAL MODULE; ITALIAN: MODULO SPERIMENTALE ELETTROMECCANICO) Overview / summary of the initiative Title: MoSE (Experimental Electromechanical Module; Italian: MOdulo Sperimentale Elettromeccanico) Country: Italy (Veneto region) Thematic area: Security, Climate change Objective(s): 1. To protect from flooding the city of Venice and the Venetian Lagoon, with its towns, villages and inhabitants along with its iconic historic, artistic and environmental heritage. 2. To contribute to the socio-economic growth of the area and hence to the development of the port and related activities. 3. To guarantee the existing and future port activities inside the Lagoon in its various specificities of Chioggia, Cavallino and Venice. Timeline: The launch of the project started in 1973, when for the first time the Italian Government took in consideration the realisation of mechanic structures to prevent Venice from flooding. 2003 (start of the works)-2019 (estimation) Scale of the initiative: EUR 5.493 million (2014 estimation) Scope of the initiative • Focused on new knowledge creation (basic research, TRLs 1-4): TO A CERTAIN EXTENT; the development and following implementation of the MoSE project have focused on knowledge creation and prototypes development since the 1980s. However, this is useful to the construction at the three inlets of the Venice lagoon and mobile barriers. • Focused on knowledge application (applied research, TRLs 5-9): YES; the MoSE project aims to apply the developed technological solutions and to demonstrate its validity. Source of funding (public/private/public-private): Public funding: since 2003 (year of start of the works) the national government has been the financial promoter of the MoSE.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mose Machine
    THE MOSE MACHINE An anthropological approach to the building oF a Flood safeguard project in the Venetian Lagoon [Received February 1st 2021; accepted February 16th 2021 – DOI: 10.21463/shima.104] Rita Vianello Ca Foscari University, Venice <[email protected]> ABSTRACT: This article reconstructs and analyses the reactions and perceptions of fishers and inhabitants of the Venetian Lagoon regarding flood events, ecosystem fragility and the saFeguard project named MOSE, which seems to be perceived by residents as a greater risk than floods. Throughout the complex development of the MOSE project, which has involved protracted legislative and technical phases, public opinion has been largely ignored, local knowledge neglected in Favour oF technical agendas and environmental impact has been largely overlooked. Fishers have begun to describe the Lagoon as a ‘sick’ and rapidly changing organism. These reports will be the starting point For investigating the fishers’ interpretations oF the environmental changes they observe during their daily Fishing trips. The cause of these changes is mostly attributed to the MOSE’S invasive anthropogenic intervention. The lack of ethical, aFFective and environmental considerations in the long history of the project has also led to opposition that has involved a conFlict between local and technical knowledge. KEYWORDS: Venetian Lagoon, acqua alta, MOSE dams, traditional ecological knowledge, small-scale Fishing. Introduction Sotto acqua stanno bene solo i pesci [Only the fish are fine under the sea]1 This essay focuses on the reactions and perceptions of fishers facing flood events, ecosystem changes and the saFeguarding MOSE (Modulo Sperimentale Elettromeccanico – ‘Experimental Electromechanical Module’) project in the Venetian Lagoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Do the Adaptations of Venice and Miami to Sea Level Rise Offer Lessons for Other Vulnerable Coastal Cities?
    Environmental Management https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01198-z Do the Adaptations of Venice and Miami to Sea Level Rise Offer Lessons for Other Vulnerable Coastal Cities? 1 2 3 Emanuela Molinaroli ● Stefano Guerzoni ● Daniel Suman Received: 5 February 2019 / Accepted: 29 July 2019 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Both Venice and Miami are high-density coastal cities that are extremely vulnerable to rising sea levels and climate change. Aside from their sea-level location, they are both characterized by large populations, valuable infrastructure and real estate, and economic dependence on tourism, as well as the availability of advanced scientific data and technological expertize. Yet their responses have been quite different. We examine the biophysical environments of the two cities, as well as their socio- economic features, administrative arrangements vulnerabilities, and responses to sea level rise and flooding. Our study uses a qualitative approach to illustrate how adaptation policies have emerged in these two coastal cities. Based on this information, we critically compare the different adaptive responses of Venice and Miami and suggest what each city may learn from the 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: other, as well as offer lessons for other vulnerable coastal cities. In the two cases presented here it would seem that adaptation to SLR has not yet led to a reformulation of the problem or a structural transformation of the relevant institutions. Decision-makers must address the complex issue of rising seas with a combination of scientific knowledge, socio-economic expertize, and good governance. In this regard, the “hi-tech” approach of Venice has generated problems of its own (as did the flood control projects in South Florida over half a century ago), while the increasing public mobilization in Miami appears more promising.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Places of Interest
    Guide to places of interest Lido di Jesolo - Venezia Cortina Oderzo Portogruaro Noventa di Piave Treviso San Donà di Piave Caorle Altino Eraclea Vicenza Jesolo Eraclea Mare Burano Cortellazzo Lido di Jesolo Dolo Venezia Verona Padova Cavallino Mira Cà Savio Chioggia Jesolo and the hinterland. 3 Cathedrals and Roman Abbeys . 10 Visits to markets Concordia Sagittaria, Summaga and San Donà di Piave Venice . 4 From the sea to Venice’s Lagoon . 11 St Mark’s Square, the Palazzo Ducale (Doge’s Palace) and the Caorle, Cortellazzo, Treporti and Lio Piccolo Rialto Bridge The Marchland of Treviso The Islands of the Lagoon . 5 and the city of Treviso . 12 Murano, Burano and Torcello Oderzo, Piazza dei Signori and the Shrine of the Madonna of Motta Verona and Lake Garda. 6 Padua . 13 Sirmione and the Grottoes of Catullo Scrovegni Chapel and Piazza delle Erbe (Square of Herbs) The Arena of Verona and Opera . 7 Vicenza . 14 Operatic music The Olympic Theatre and the Ponte Vecchio (Old Bridge) of Bas- sano del Grappa Cortina and the Dolomites . 8 The three peaks of Lavaredo and Lake Misurina Riviera del Brenta . 15 Villas and gardens The Coastlines . 9 Malamocco, Pellestrina, Chioggia 2 Noventa di Piave Treviso San Donà di Piave Eraclea Caorle Jesolo Eraclea Mare Lido di Jesolo Cortellazzo Cavallino Jesolo and the hinterland The lagoon with its northern appendage wends its way into the area of Jesolo between the river and the cultivated countryside. The large fishing valleys of the northern lagoon extend over an area that is waiting to be explored. Whatever your requirements, please discuss these with our staff who will be more than happy to help.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence of Venice Littoral Islands - IT
    Defence of Venice littoral islands - IT Defence of Venice littoral islands - IT 1. Policy Objective & Theme ADAPTATION TO RISK: Managing impacts of climate change and safeguarding resilience of coasts/coastal systems SUSTAINABLE USE OF RESOURCES: Preserving coastal environment (its functioning and integrity) to share space 2. Key Approaches Knowledge-based Technical 3. Experiences that can be exchanged The measures adopted are the most important protected beach nourishment projects ever implemented in Italy on an eroding coastline with sea wall, according to the most advanced techniques of modern coastal engineering, attributing great importance to the protected nourished beaches for their capacity to dissipate wave energy in a resilient way. 4. Overview of the case The coastal barrier between the Adriatic Sea and the lagoon is constituted by the littorals of Jesolo, Cavallino, Lido, Pellestrina, Sottomarina and Isola Verde. The lagoon communicates with the sea through the three inlets of Lido, Malamocco and Chioggia. Over time, the coastal strip has lost its defensive function. The built-up areas closest to the sea are ever more often at risk.These problems have been faced through a complex programme of interventions, including the reinforcement of the coastline. The measures adopted have been developed from international experienced reshaped for the particular coastline. 5. Context and Objectives a) Context Venice is located in a lagoon protected from the Adriatic Sea by a coastal barrier that stretches for a total of about 60 km. The coastline is made up of strips of land: the coastal strips of Jesolo and Cavallino, the two inlands of Lido and Pellestrina and the sand beaches of Sottomarina and Isola Verde.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ransom of Mussels in the Lagoon of Venice: When the Louses Become “Black Gold”
    International Review of Social Research 2017; 7(1): 22–30 Research Article Open Access Rita Vianello The ransom of mussels in the lagoon of Venice: when the louses become “black gold”. DOI 10.1515/irsr-2017-0004 (and still call them today) “peòci”, that is to say louses. Received: February 1, 2016; Accepted: December 20, 2016 They used to consider them not edible and sometimes Abstract: The article presented here is rooted in our doctoral even poisonous. However today, they are known to have research in Ethnology and Social History developed in the an exquisite taste and all the inhabitants eat them as a lagoon of Venice in 2010-2013. It is a research based on the habit. To paraphrase Hobsbawm (Hobsbawm and Ranger methodology of ethnographic field research, in parallel 1983), we are witnessing an example of insular “invented with the bibliographic and archive research. The fieldwork tradition”, applied to the local feeding. The mussels have was conducted between March 2010 and August 2012 become the object of a curious process: if beforehand they with 21 informants, fishermen aged 20 to 90 years. In this were perceived as venomous, as undesirable shells which article we analyze how the formation of a new food taste were damaging fishing nets, they then became a refined is a process that can be defined “cultural”. We can meet an and sought food served in restaurants and in the festive example in the history of mussel-farming on the island of moments and user-friendly. Pellestrina, an island of fishermen in the southern lagoon The main phenomenon of our study is the change of Venice, where the exploitation of this mollusk as food of attitude particularly interesting from an ethnological and economic resource appears rather late in history.
    [Show full text]
  • Project of Territorial Governance of Tourism in Venice
    Project of territorial governance of tourism in Venice Project of territorial governance of tourism in Venice 2 Project of territorial governance of tourism in Venice Table of Contents FOREWORD.............................................................................................................................................................7 FIRST PART:...........................................................................................................................................................11 THE START OF A PARTICIPATORY ROUTE.................................................................................................................11 1. The functions of tourism and the regulatory framework...............................................................................13 2. Tourism in Venice..........................................................................................................................................15 3. The resident population................................................................................................................................22 4. The stages of the participatory route.............................................................................................................25 5. Principal mission statements of the projects presented and adopted by the Technical Working Group..........27 SECOND PART:.......................................................................................................................................................43 OPERATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Veneziaterreing.Pdf
    ACCESS SCORZÉ NOALE MARCO POLO AIRPORT - Tessera SALZANO S. MARIA DECUMANO QUARTO PORTEGRANDI DI SALA D'ALTINO SPINEA MIRANO MMEESSTTRREE Aeroporto Marco Polo SANTA LUCIA RAILWa AY STATION - Venice MARGHERA ezia TORCELLO Padova-Ven BURANO autostrada S.GIULIANO DOLO MIRA MURANO MALCONTENTA STRÀ i ORIAGO WATER-BUS STATION FIESSO TREPORTI CAVALLINO D'ARTICO FUSINA VTP. - M. 103 for Venice PUNTA SABBIONI RIVIERA DEL BRENTA VENEZIA LIDO WATER-BUS STATION MALAMOCCO VTP - San Basilio ALBERONI z S. PIETRO IN VOLTA WATER-BUS STATION Riva 7 Martiri - Venice PORTOSECCO PELLESTRINA P PIAZZALE ROMA CAe R PARK - Venice P TRONCHETTO CAR PARK - Venice P INDUSTRIAL AREA Cn AR PARK - Marghera P RAILWAY-STATION CAR PARK - Mestre e P FUSINA CAR PARK - Mestre + P SAN GIULIANO CAR PARK - Mestre V P PUNTA SABBIONI CAR PARK - Cavallino The changing face of Venice The architect Frank O. Gehry has been • The Fusina terminal has been designed entrusted with developing what has been by A. Cecchetto.This terminal will be of SAVE, the company that has been run- • defined as a project for the new airport strategic importance as the port of entry ning Venice airport since 1987 is exten- marina. It comprises a series of facilities from the mainland to the lagoon and ding facilities to easily cope with the con- that are vital for the future development historical Venice. stant increase in traffic at Venice airport. of the airport, such as a hotel and an The new airport is able to process 6 mil- The new water-bus station has been desi- administration centre with meeting and • lion passengers a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocdpcn 616/2019
    DECRETO DEL C.D. n. 4 del 18 aprile 2020 - ALLEGATO 1 O.C.D.P.C. N. 616/2019 - ECCEZIONALI EVENTI METEOROLOGICI VERIFICATISI A PARTIRE DAL GIORNO 12 NOVEMBRE 2019 NEL TERRITORIO DEL COMUNE DI VENEZIA Contributi per l’immediato sostegno alla popolazione – PRIVATI - art. 25, comma 2, lettera c), Decreto legislativo 2 gennaio 2018, n. 1 QUADRO RIEPILOGATIVO SOGGETTI AMMESSI AL CONTRIBUTO - PRIMO STRALCIO – ELENCO DEI CONTRIBUTI LIQUIDABILI A FAVORE DI PRIVATI LEGENDA: Indennizzi assicurativi quantificati: N=non quantificato Liquidazione Totale o Parziale del contributo richiesto: P=parziale; T=totale. GENERALITÀ RENDICONTAZIONE Rendicontato Liquidazione Costi effettivamente sostenuti, Totale o Indennizzi assicurativi ammissibile al netto CONTRIBUTO Numeraz. Numero Protocollo Nominativo del dichiarante Indirizzo unità immobiliare interessata documentati, ammissibili alla Parziale del quantificati degli indennizzi elenco domanda (COGNOME – NOME) dall’evento data del Decreto contributo EROGABILE (B) (A) (A-B) richiesto DORSODURO 1539, DORSODURO, S. 1 10 GALLOTTI DARIO POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 444,00 N € 444,00 T € 444,00 FISOLA SAN MARTINO DESTRA 513, BURANO, 2 17 CERINI FIORELLA € 610,00 N € 610,00 T € 610,00 MAZZORBO, TORCELLO PELLESTRINA 546, PELLESTRINA, S. 3 36 SCARPA MARIO € 550,00 N € 550,00 T € 550,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA CASTELLO 5091, S. MARCO, CASTELLO, S. 4 45 FORT LORENZO € 430,00 N € 430,00 T € 430,00 ELENA, CANNAREGIO DORSODURO 1904/E, DORSODURO, S. 5 80 COMERCI DANIELE POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 3.115,00 N € 3.115,00 T € 3.115,00 FISOLA PELLESTRINA 1062, PELLESTRINA, S. 6 94 GHEZZO MAURO € 1.448,00 N € 1.448,00 T € 1.448,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA DORSODURO 716, DORSODURO, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Percorso Cicloturistico Lido E Pellestrina
    MUSEO DI MALAMOCCO OASI DUNE DEGLI ALBERONI Il Palazzo del Podestà di L'area naturale dell'Oasi delle Malamocco è sede espositiva Dune degli Alberoni (circa 160 ha), permanente di reperti all'estremità sud del Lido di Venezia, archeologici. Il materiale è un sito di grande interesse espositivo è costituito naturalistico per la presenza di Assessorato all’Ambiente specie di flora, fauna e habitat unici prevalentemente da reperti medievali di ceramica graffita, nel contesto dell'ecosistema Campo Manin 4023 - Venezia rinvenuti durante varie campagne lagunare e litorale veneziano. 041.2759567 – 041.2748468 di scavo condotte in area Alle spalle della spiaggia, lunga 2 km, [email protected] veneziana e in prossimità del centro di Malamocco. Il percorso si trova uno dei più estesi e meglio www.comune.venezia.it/ambiente espositivo è vario e articolato e documenta la valenza di un conservati sistemi di dune delle coste www.silvenezia.it territorio ricco di testimonianze archeologiche. dell'Alto Adriatico. Per la tutela e conservazione di Palazzo del Podestà - Piazza Maggiore - Malamocco questi habitat collaborano da anni Per visita ed informazioni tel. 333.6143976 Comune di Venezia, WWF (l'attuale associazione che gestisce l'Oasi) e i Servizi Forestali Regionali di Treviso e Venezia (per la PERCORSO CICLOTURISTICO gestione dell’area di pineta di 30 ettari). Piazzale Bagni Alberoni LUNGO IL LITORALE CENTRO INFORMATIVO SULLE TE GNÙ E Per visita ed informazioni tel. 349.4511016 Presso il palazzo del Podestà è aperto al e-mail: [email protected] pubblico il nuovo centro di informazione e DEL LIDO E PELLESTRINA formazione dedicato alle tegnùe, habitat rocciosi sottomarini al largo del litorale OASI DI C A’ R OM AN veneziano.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of the Ecosystem of the Lagoon of Venice, with Emphasis on Anthropogenic Impact
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published October 3 Mar Ecol Prog Ser , Study of the ecosystem of the lagoon of Venice, with emphasis on anthropogenic impact Yu. I. Sorokinl, P. Yu. Sorokinl, 0.Giovanardi2,*, L. Dalla venezia3 'Southern Dept. of Oceanology, Gelendzhik-7, Krasnodar district, 353470 Russia 'Istituto Centrale per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica Applicata al Mare (ICRAM), viale della Stazione 5, 1-30015 Chioggia, Italy "stituto di Biologia del Mare, CNR, Riva Sette Martiri 1364, 1-30122 Venice, Italy ABSTRACT: The parameters of the structure and functioning of the ecosystem in the lagoon of Venice (Italy) were estimated in September-October 1993 at 36 stations. Phytoplankton was dominated by its nano- and pico-fractions, which comprised 60 to 99":# of the total phytoplankton biomass. Phytoplank- ton wet biomass varied between 100 and 600 mg m-.' and its primary production between 30 and 90 mg C m ' d.' The nume~icalabundance of bactel-ioplankton (3 to 6 X 10" cells ml-'l and its wet biomass (0.3to 1 g m-" was 2 to 3 times greater than in adjacent waters of the Adriatic. Bacterial production was 20 to 40 mg C m-'d.'. hdicrozooplankton was dominated by cillates with blo~nassesof 30 to 700 mg m-', while the density of rotifers and nauplii was low. The composition of mesozooplankton resembled that of the Adriatic complex only near the port entrances connecting the lagoon to the sea, while in polluted areas it was drastically depleted. Its average wet biomass was 80 to 300 mg m-', attaming 700 to 1100 mg m-' near the port entrances.
    [Show full text]
  • Per La Continuità Del Saper Fare: CHRISTA Dr.Ssa Nadia GIARETTA Project Regione Del Veneto – Direzione Turismo Partner Logo [email protected]
    Per la continuità del saper fare: CHRISTA Dr.ssa Nadia GIARETTA Project Regione del Veneto – Direzione Turismo partner logo [email protected] 16 Maggio, 2017 Arsenale Nord, tesa 94 – Venezia Grand Tour, evento organizzato da UNESCO Giovani e Google Culture and Heritage for Responsible, Innovative and Sustainable Tourism Action OBIETTIVI • Proteggere e preservare il patrimonio naturale e culturale nelle regioni coinvolte, • Recuperare e valorizzare il «patrimonio industriale» il «patrimonio intangibile», • Sviluppare nuovi strumenti di tutela e di valorizzazione degli attrattori turistici costituenti il patrimonio naturale e culturale, attraverso la digitalizzazione e/o migliori tecniche di comunicazione. 2 Partenariato 3 Temi prioritari Le 4 I 1. Patrimonio Intangibile Lavori e saperi tradizionali, artigianato locale, prodotti tipici, usi e costumi 2. Patrimonio Industriale Specializzazione manifatturiera 3. Strumenti di Interpretazione Migliori tecniche di comunicazione 4. Digitalizzazione e Innovazione Nuovi strumenti di tutela e di valorizzazione 4 La Regione del Veneto pone l’attenzione sulle Isole di Venezia Ogni isola della Laguna ha una propria Torcello SPECIFICITA’ che la definisce e la differenzia dalle altre: Burano Mazzorbo • lavoro, Sant’Erasmo • tipologia delle Murano strutture edilizie, • modo di vivere, San Servolo • sistema delle relazioni. trovano supporto nella INTANGIBILITA’ Pellestrina DELLE TRADIZIONI e nella CULTURA LOCALE. 5 Specificità nelle Isole di Venezia Isola di Murano Isola di Burano Isola di Pellestrina Vetro artistico Merletti Merletti Isola di Mazzorbo Isola di Torcello Viticoltura e orticoltura Eccellenze architettoniche 6 La situazione congiunturale Pesca Vetro Merletto CRISI PERICOLO Orticoltura Viticoltura 7 Le 4 I nelle Isole Veneziane: alcuni esempi Il merletto 1. Patrimonio Intangibile La pesca tradizionale 2.
    [Show full text]