Ocdpcn 616/2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ocdpcn 616/2019 DECRETO DEL C.D. n. 4 del 18 aprile 2020 - ALLEGATO 1 O.C.D.P.C. N. 616/2019 - ECCEZIONALI EVENTI METEOROLOGICI VERIFICATISI A PARTIRE DAL GIORNO 12 NOVEMBRE 2019 NEL TERRITORIO DEL COMUNE DI VENEZIA Contributi per l’immediato sostegno alla popolazione – PRIVATI - art. 25, comma 2, lettera c), Decreto legislativo 2 gennaio 2018, n. 1 QUADRO RIEPILOGATIVO SOGGETTI AMMESSI AL CONTRIBUTO - PRIMO STRALCIO – ELENCO DEI CONTRIBUTI LIQUIDABILI A FAVORE DI PRIVATI LEGENDA: Indennizzi assicurativi quantificati: N=non quantificato Liquidazione Totale o Parziale del contributo richiesto: P=parziale; T=totale. GENERALITÀ RENDICONTAZIONE Rendicontato Liquidazione Costi effettivamente sostenuti, Totale o Indennizzi assicurativi ammissibile al netto CONTRIBUTO Numeraz. Numero Protocollo Nominativo del dichiarante Indirizzo unità immobiliare interessata documentati, ammissibili alla Parziale del quantificati degli indennizzi elenco domanda (COGNOME – NOME) dall’evento data del Decreto contributo EROGABILE (B) (A) (A-B) richiesto DORSODURO 1539, DORSODURO, S. 1 10 GALLOTTI DARIO POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 444,00 N € 444,00 T € 444,00 FISOLA SAN MARTINO DESTRA 513, BURANO, 2 17 CERINI FIORELLA € 610,00 N € 610,00 T € 610,00 MAZZORBO, TORCELLO PELLESTRINA 546, PELLESTRINA, S. 3 36 SCARPA MARIO € 550,00 N € 550,00 T € 550,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA CASTELLO 5091, S. MARCO, CASTELLO, S. 4 45 FORT LORENZO € 430,00 N € 430,00 T € 430,00 ELENA, CANNAREGIO DORSODURO 1904/E, DORSODURO, S. 5 80 COMERCI DANIELE POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 3.115,00 N € 3.115,00 T € 3.115,00 FISOLA PELLESTRINA 1062, PELLESTRINA, S. 6 94 GHEZZO MAURO € 1.448,00 N € 1.448,00 T € 1.448,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA DORSODURO 716, DORSODURO, S. 7 101 GASPARI LUCIA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 720,00 N € 720,00 T € 720,00 FISOLA SANTA CROCE 209/A, DORSODURO, S. 8 140 CAPPELLO FRANCESCA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 1.600,00 N € 1.600,00 T € 1.600,00 FISOLA PELLESTRINA 305/A, PELLESTRINA, S. 9 190 VIANELLO BRUNA € 635,00 N € 635,00 T € 635,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA SANTA CROCE 640, DORSODURO, S. 10 297 KAREEM MAJED ALI POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 4.992,00 N € 4.992,00 T € 4.992,00 FISOLA SANTA CROCE 2309, DORSODURO, S. 11 450 CARLETTI GIANCARLO POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 513,00 N € 513,00 T € 513,00 FISOLA SAN MAURO 47, BURANO, MAZZORBO, 12 460 ROSSI AUGUSTO € 449,00 N € 449,00 T € 449,00 TORCELLO SAN POLO 2569, DORSODURO, S. POLO, 13 503 TREVISANI ALESSANDRO € 4.664,00 N € 4.664,00 T € 4.664,00 S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA FISOLA PELLESTRINA 176, PELLESTRINA, S. 14 526 SCARPA EMILIO € 650,00 N € 650,00 T € 650,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA CALLE DEL CRISTO 32, MURANO, S. 15 777 VILLAN ELENA € 577,46 N € 577,46 T € 577,46 ERASMO Commissario Delegato ex OCDPC n. 616/2019 Data: 18/04/2020, PG/2020/0001930 DECRETO DEL C.D. n. 4 del 18 aprile 2020 - ALLEGATO 1 GIUDECCA 856/A, DORSODURO, S. 16 782 BURCOVICH ALESSANDRA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 818,00 N € 818,00 T € 818,00 FISOLA SAN MAURO 345, BURANO, MAZZORBO, 17 825 DEI ROSSI SILVANA € 524,00 N € 524,00 T € 524,00 TORCELLO PELLESTRINA 1120, PELLESTRINA, S. 18 826 ZENNARO CRISTINA € 4.675,00 N € 4.675,00 T € 4.675,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA SANTA CROCE 1855, DORSODURO, S. 19 847 BATTISTELLA MIRCO POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 4.980,00 N € 4.980,00 T € 4.980,00 FISOLA GIUDECCA 104, BURANO, MAZZORBO, 20 904 SENO ELISEO € 859,00 N € 859,00 T € 859,00 TORCELLO CANNAREGIO 3618 (S. MARCO, 21 997 PAVON BIANCA € 344,00 N € 344,00 T € 344,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) DORSODURO 1635, DORSODURO, S. 22 1007 CANINO MILO POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 699,00 N € 699,00 T € 699,00 FISOLA DORSODURO 3945, DORSODURO, S. 23 1020 HAELTERMAN BEATRIJS LOUISE POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 284,00 N € 284,00 T € 284,00 FISOLA DORSODURO 1905 (DORSODURO, S. 24 1028 MAIONE ANTONELLA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 4.370,00 N € 4.370,00 T € 4.370,00 FISOLA) SAN MARTINO SINISTRA 56, BURANO, 25 1046 ZANE FRANCESCO € 640,00 N € 640,00 T € 640,00 MAZZORBO, TORCELLO PELLESTRINA 607, PELLESTRINA, S. 26 1055 VIANELLO AURORA € 1.358,00 N € 1.358,00 T € 1.358,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA SANTA CROCE 1927, DORSODURO, S. 27 1060 BOSCOLO ANTONIO POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 484,00 N € 484,00 T € 484,00 FISOLA SANTA CROCE 410, DORSODURO, S. 28 1067 NACCARI ALDO POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 644,00 N € 644,00 T € 644,00 FISOLA PELLESTRINA 440, PELLESTRINA, S. 29 1092 FRANCA VOLTOLINA € 789,00 N € 789,00 T € 789,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA SANTA CROCE 412, DORSODURO, S. 30 1094 BATTAIN CINZIA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 1.130,00 N € 1.130,00 T € 1.130,00 FISOLA SAN MARTINO DESTRA 773, BURANO, 31 1158 ZANELLA VERA ELISA € 449,00 N € 449,00 T € 449,00 MAZZORBO, TORCELLO SAN MARTINO DESTRA 395, BURANO, 32 1179 MOLIN SILVANO € 330,00 N € 330,00 T € 330,00 MAZZORBO, TORCELLO CALLE DEL CRISTO 6, MURANO, S. 33 1187 FUGA MARIA NICLA € 700,00 N € 700,00 T € 700,00 ERASMO PELLESTRINA 897, PELLESTRINA, S. 34 1225 BUSETTO ALESSANDRO € 349,00 N € 349,00 T € 349,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA SAN MARCO 3225, S. MARCO, CASTELLO, 35 1283 GIURIATO PAOLO € 1.000,00 N € 1.000,00 T € 1.000,00 S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO SAN POLO 3084/A, DORSODURO, S. 36 1312 MORONATO RUGGERO POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 1.025,00 N € 1.025,00 T € 1.025,00 FISOLA PELLESTRINA 548/A, PELLESTRINA, S. 37 1314 GIOVANNI SCARPA € 1.499,00 N € 1.499,00 T € 1.499,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA Commissario Delegato ex OCDPC n. 616/2019 Data: 18/04/2020, PG/2020/0001930 DECRETO DEL C.D. n. 4 del 18 aprile 2020 - ALLEGATO 1 CASTELLO 5266, S. MARCO, CASTELLO, S. 38 1318 SALVADORI ALFREDO € 244,00 N € 244,00 T € 244,00 ELENA, CANNAREGIO PELLESTRINA 833, PELLESTRINA, S. 39 1357 SCARPA ANTONIO € 304,95 N € 304,95 T € 304,95 PIETRO IN VOLTA PELLESTRINA 514, PELLESTRINA, S. 40 1366 ZENNARO VINCENZO € 1.419,00 N € 1.419,00 T € 1.419,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA CANNAREGIO 4338, S. MARCO, 41 1385 CIBIEN EUGENIA € 999,00 N € 999,00 T € 999,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO PELLESTRINA 181, PELLESTRINA, S. 42 1392 SCARPA NORINO € 2.930,00 N € 2.930,00 T € 2.930,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA CASTELLO 200, S. MARCO, CASTELLO, S. 43 1396 SAVIO ELISABETTA € 721,62 N € 721,62 T € 721,62 ELENA, CANNAREGIO SAN MARTINO SINISTRA 272 (BURANO, 44 1539 SENO GIOVANNI € 349,00 N € 349,00 T € 349,00 MAZZORBO, TORCELLO) SANTA CROCE 1639 (DORSODURO, S. 45 1637 REGAZZO MARIA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 878,00 N € 878,00 T € 878,00 FISOLA) SAN POLO 874 (DORSODURO, S. POLO, 46 1657 BROCCA RENATO € 790,00 N € 790,00 T € 790,00 S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA FISOLA) DORSODURO 594 (DORSODURO, S. 47 1717 BACCI GREGORIO POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 444,00 N € 444,00 T € 444,00 FISOLA) CANNAREGIO 5915 (S. MARCO, 48 1783 CAPRIOGLIO GIOVANNA € 1.661,00 N € 1.661,00 T € 1.661,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) SAN MARCO 4102 (S. MARCO, 49 1801 GALANTE PAOLO € 504,00 N € 504,00 T € 504,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) PELLESTRINA 899 (PELLESTRINA, S. 50 1828 POLELLO LUCA € 4.056,00 N € 4.056,00 T € 4.056,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) GIUDECCA 54/A (BURANO, MAZZORBO, 51 1860 ZANE ALDO € 225,89 N € 225,89 T € 225,89 TORCELLO) SANTA CROCE 413 (DORSODURO, S. 52 1991 TOSO ANNAMARIA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 1.332,00 N € 1.332,00 T € 1.332,00 FISOLA) SAN MARCO 2669 (S. MARCO, 53 2015 VARTIC SVETLANA € 1.697,00 N € 1.697,00 T € 1.697,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) CASTELLO 1982 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, S. 54 2052 ROMINA MINGARDI € 865,00 N € 865,00 T € 865,00 ELENA, CANNAREGIO) VIA LEPANTO 39/A (LIDO, MALAMOCCO, 55 2053 NOGHERA ALBERTO € 3.809,64 N € 3.809,64 T € 3.809,64 ALBERONI) PELLESTRINA 1022/A (PELLESTRINA, S. 56 2056 BUSETTO EMANUELE € 868,00 N € 868,00 T € 868,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) VIA LEPANTO 29 (LIDO, MALAMOCCO, 57 2082 NOGHERA ALBERTO € 4.818,18 N € 4.818,18 T € 4.818,18 ALBERONI) CASTELLO 2017 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, S. 58 2090 MINGARDI FRANCA € 1.015,00 N € 1.015,00 T € 1.015,00 ELENA, CANNAREGIO) VIA JACOPO NANI 4 (LIDO, 59 2127 NOGHERA ALBERTO € 3.508,60 N € 3.508,60 T € 3.508,60 MALAMOCCO, ALBERONI) VIA LEPANTO 34/B (LIDO, MALAMOCCO, 60 2143 NOGHERA ALBERTO € 1.884,60 N € 1.884,60 T € 1.884,60 ALBERONI) GIUDECCA 638/A (DORSODURO, S. 61 2168 URBANI DE GHELTOF MARIA POLO, S. CROCE, GIUDECCA, SACCA € 439,00 N € 439,00 T € 439,00 FISOLA) 62 2199 VISMARA ANDREA CASTELLO 210 (S. MARCO, CASTELLO, S. € 844,00 N € 844,00 T € 844,00 Commissario Delegato ex OCDPC n. 616/2019 Data: 18/04/2020, PG/2020/0001930 DECRETO DEL C.D. n. 4 del 18 aprile 2020 - ALLEGATO 1 ELENA, CANNAREGIO) CANNAREGIO 3505/C (S. MARCO, 63 2251 FOSCATO BRUNO € 244,00 N € 244,00 T € 244,00 CASTELLO, S. ELENA, CANNAREGIO) PELLESTRINA 837 (PELLESTRINA, S. 64 2264 VIANELLO VINCENZO € 550,00 N € 550,00 T € 550,00 PIETRO IN VOLTA) CASTELLO 3279 (S.
Recommended publications
  • MOSE (EXPERIMENTAL ELECTROMECHANICAL MODULE; ITALIAN: MODULO SPERIMENTALE ELETTROMECCANICO) Overview / Summary of the Initiative
    MOSE (EXPERIMENTAL ELECTROMECHANICAL MODULE; ITALIAN: MODULO SPERIMENTALE ELETTROMECCANICO) Overview / summary of the initiative Title: MoSE (Experimental Electromechanical Module; Italian: MOdulo Sperimentale Elettromeccanico) Country: Italy (Veneto region) Thematic area: Security, Climate change Objective(s): 1. To protect from flooding the city of Venice and the Venetian Lagoon, with its towns, villages and inhabitants along with its iconic historic, artistic and environmental heritage. 2. To contribute to the socio-economic growth of the area and hence to the development of the port and related activities. 3. To guarantee the existing and future port activities inside the Lagoon in its various specificities of Chioggia, Cavallino and Venice. Timeline: The launch of the project started in 1973, when for the first time the Italian Government took in consideration the realisation of mechanic structures to prevent Venice from flooding. 2003 (start of the works)-2019 (estimation) Scale of the initiative: EUR 5.493 million (2014 estimation) Scope of the initiative • Focused on new knowledge creation (basic research, TRLs 1-4): TO A CERTAIN EXTENT; the development and following implementation of the MoSE project have focused on knowledge creation and prototypes development since the 1980s. However, this is useful to the construction at the three inlets of the Venice lagoon and mobile barriers. • Focused on knowledge application (applied research, TRLs 5-9): YES; the MoSE project aims to apply the developed technological solutions and to demonstrate its validity. Source of funding (public/private/public-private): Public funding: since 2003 (year of start of the works) the national government has been the financial promoter of the MoSE.
    [Show full text]
  • Programma Del Festival Delle Arti 2016
    1 CAMPO VAPORETTO Fermata Sacca Fisola Spazi Derive e nuovi approdi 2 CENTRO XXV APRILE Calle del Teatro 1, Sacca Fisola 3 GIUDECCA 795 ART GALLERY In un contesto difficile e distratto, il tema della settima edizione del Fondamenta S. Biagio 795 Festival delle Arti vuole essere un invito a salpare verso destinazioni 4 FONDAMENTA S. BIAGIO sconosciute e imprevedibili, usando la “deriva” psicogeografica come 5 AREA “CASETTE” pratica estetica di lettura di un territorio urbano in continua 6 CAMPO S. COSMO trasformazione. 7 EX CONVENTO SS. COSMA E DAMIANO Abbiamo invitato gli artisti a rapportarsi con lo spazio pubblico di Campo S. Cosmo 620/A Giudecca e Sacca Fisola con percorsi sino ad ora inesplorati, per 8 ASS. IL CENTRO DELLA LUCE DORATA sorprendersi, avere nuove visioni, aggiungervi dimensione ed Corte Nova 633 emozione, capirne le peculiarità, lasciandosi ispirare per opere 9 FONDAMENTA S. EUFEMIA Come raggiungerci Porticato della Chiesa inedite. 10 XFRAME STUDIO I partecipanti potranno misurare le proprie gesta performative con Fermate dei mezzi di trasporto pubblico Actv: Sacca Fisola, Palanca, Redentore, Zitelle Fondamenta S. Eufemia 673 l'aperto di corti e fondamenta, il percorribile di calli e callette, il > linea 2 e 4.1 da Ferrovia e da P.le Roma (parcheggio auto) direz. S.Zaccaria 11 FONDAMENTA S. EUFEMIA e CALLE DEL PISTOR navigabile di canali e lagune, lo scavalcabile dei muri e l’elevabile > linea 2 da Tronchetto (parcheggio auto) direzione S. Zaccaria 12 PATRONATO DON BOSCO delle altane. > linea 2 da Zattere direzione S. Zaccaria Calle lunga de l’Accademia dei Nobili 618 > linea 2 e 4.2 da S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mose Machine
    THE MOSE MACHINE An anthropological approach to the building oF a Flood safeguard project in the Venetian Lagoon [Received February 1st 2021; accepted February 16th 2021 – DOI: 10.21463/shima.104] Rita Vianello Ca Foscari University, Venice <[email protected]> ABSTRACT: This article reconstructs and analyses the reactions and perceptions of fishers and inhabitants of the Venetian Lagoon regarding flood events, ecosystem fragility and the saFeguard project named MOSE, which seems to be perceived by residents as a greater risk than floods. Throughout the complex development of the MOSE project, which has involved protracted legislative and technical phases, public opinion has been largely ignored, local knowledge neglected in Favour oF technical agendas and environmental impact has been largely overlooked. Fishers have begun to describe the Lagoon as a ‘sick’ and rapidly changing organism. These reports will be the starting point For investigating the fishers’ interpretations oF the environmental changes they observe during their daily Fishing trips. The cause of these changes is mostly attributed to the MOSE’S invasive anthropogenic intervention. The lack of ethical, aFFective and environmental considerations in the long history of the project has also led to opposition that has involved a conFlict between local and technical knowledge. KEYWORDS: Venetian Lagoon, acqua alta, MOSE dams, traditional ecological knowledge, small-scale Fishing. Introduction Sotto acqua stanno bene solo i pesci [Only the fish are fine under the sea]1 This essay focuses on the reactions and perceptions of fishers facing flood events, ecosystem changes and the saFeguarding MOSE (Modulo Sperimentale Elettromeccanico – ‘Experimental Electromechanical Module’) project in the Venetian Lagoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Do the Adaptations of Venice and Miami to Sea Level Rise Offer Lessons for Other Vulnerable Coastal Cities?
    Environmental Management https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01198-z Do the Adaptations of Venice and Miami to Sea Level Rise Offer Lessons for Other Vulnerable Coastal Cities? 1 2 3 Emanuela Molinaroli ● Stefano Guerzoni ● Daniel Suman Received: 5 February 2019 / Accepted: 29 July 2019 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Both Venice and Miami are high-density coastal cities that are extremely vulnerable to rising sea levels and climate change. Aside from their sea-level location, they are both characterized by large populations, valuable infrastructure and real estate, and economic dependence on tourism, as well as the availability of advanced scientific data and technological expertize. Yet their responses have been quite different. We examine the biophysical environments of the two cities, as well as their socio- economic features, administrative arrangements vulnerabilities, and responses to sea level rise and flooding. Our study uses a qualitative approach to illustrate how adaptation policies have emerged in these two coastal cities. Based on this information, we critically compare the different adaptive responses of Venice and Miami and suggest what each city may learn from the 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: other, as well as offer lessons for other vulnerable coastal cities. In the two cases presented here it would seem that adaptation to SLR has not yet led to a reformulation of the problem or a structural transformation of the relevant institutions. Decision-makers must address the complex issue of rising seas with a combination of scientific knowledge, socio-economic expertize, and good governance. In this regard, the “hi-tech” approach of Venice has generated problems of its own (as did the flood control projects in South Florida over half a century ago), while the increasing public mobilization in Miami appears more promising.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Places of Interest
    Guide to places of interest Lido di Jesolo - Venezia Cortina Oderzo Portogruaro Noventa di Piave Treviso San Donà di Piave Caorle Altino Eraclea Vicenza Jesolo Eraclea Mare Burano Cortellazzo Lido di Jesolo Dolo Venezia Verona Padova Cavallino Mira Cà Savio Chioggia Jesolo and the hinterland. 3 Cathedrals and Roman Abbeys . 10 Visits to markets Concordia Sagittaria, Summaga and San Donà di Piave Venice . 4 From the sea to Venice’s Lagoon . 11 St Mark’s Square, the Palazzo Ducale (Doge’s Palace) and the Caorle, Cortellazzo, Treporti and Lio Piccolo Rialto Bridge The Marchland of Treviso The Islands of the Lagoon . 5 and the city of Treviso . 12 Murano, Burano and Torcello Oderzo, Piazza dei Signori and the Shrine of the Madonna of Motta Verona and Lake Garda. 6 Padua . 13 Sirmione and the Grottoes of Catullo Scrovegni Chapel and Piazza delle Erbe (Square of Herbs) The Arena of Verona and Opera . 7 Vicenza . 14 Operatic music The Olympic Theatre and the Ponte Vecchio (Old Bridge) of Bas- sano del Grappa Cortina and the Dolomites . 8 The three peaks of Lavaredo and Lake Misurina Riviera del Brenta . 15 Villas and gardens The Coastlines . 9 Malamocco, Pellestrina, Chioggia 2 Noventa di Piave Treviso San Donà di Piave Eraclea Caorle Jesolo Eraclea Mare Lido di Jesolo Cortellazzo Cavallino Jesolo and the hinterland The lagoon with its northern appendage wends its way into the area of Jesolo between the river and the cultivated countryside. The large fishing valleys of the northern lagoon extend over an area that is waiting to be explored. Whatever your requirements, please discuss these with our staff who will be more than happy to help.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence of Venice Littoral Islands - IT
    Defence of Venice littoral islands - IT Defence of Venice littoral islands - IT 1. Policy Objective & Theme ADAPTATION TO RISK: Managing impacts of climate change and safeguarding resilience of coasts/coastal systems SUSTAINABLE USE OF RESOURCES: Preserving coastal environment (its functioning and integrity) to share space 2. Key Approaches Knowledge-based Technical 3. Experiences that can be exchanged The measures adopted are the most important protected beach nourishment projects ever implemented in Italy on an eroding coastline with sea wall, according to the most advanced techniques of modern coastal engineering, attributing great importance to the protected nourished beaches for their capacity to dissipate wave energy in a resilient way. 4. Overview of the case The coastal barrier between the Adriatic Sea and the lagoon is constituted by the littorals of Jesolo, Cavallino, Lido, Pellestrina, Sottomarina and Isola Verde. The lagoon communicates with the sea through the three inlets of Lido, Malamocco and Chioggia. Over time, the coastal strip has lost its defensive function. The built-up areas closest to the sea are ever more often at risk.These problems have been faced through a complex programme of interventions, including the reinforcement of the coastline. The measures adopted have been developed from international experienced reshaped for the particular coastline. 5. Context and Objectives a) Context Venice is located in a lagoon protected from the Adriatic Sea by a coastal barrier that stretches for a total of about 60 km. The coastline is made up of strips of land: the coastal strips of Jesolo and Cavallino, the two inlands of Lido and Pellestrina and the sand beaches of Sottomarina and Isola Verde.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Accessibility of Historical Cities: the Venetian Case Study Valeria Tatano, Francesca Guidolin, Francesca Peltrera
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Vol:11, No:5, 2017 Urban Accessibility of Historical Cities: The Venetian Case Study Valeria Tatano, Francesca Guidolin, Francesca Peltrera original functionality or to add new functions, while always Abstract—The preservation of historical Italian heritage, at the safeguarding its historical and cultural value. urban and architectural scale, has to consider restrictions and In historical refurbishment intervention it is often necessary requirements connected with conservation issues and usability needs, to intervene ensuring appropriate levels of accessibility, which are often at odds with historical heritage preservation. Recent reducing as much as possible the presence of architectural decades have been marked by the search for increased accessibility not only of public and private buildings, but to the whole historical barriers. city, also for people with disability. Moreover, in the last years the Making the country’s heritage accessible to people with concepts of Smart City and Healthy City seek to improve disabilities, means restoring and adapting urban spaces, while accessibility both in terms of mobility (independent or assisted) and looking for solutions that are able to combine restoration fruition of goods and services, also for historical cities. The principles preservation requirements with those of Inclusive Design and of Inclusive Design have introduced new criteria for the improvement regulations that guarantee their correct application; however, it of public urban space, between current regulations and best practices. Moreover, they have contributed to transforming “special needs” into is not always to achieve this aim. This is especially the case in an opportunity of social innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ransom of Mussels in the Lagoon of Venice: When the Louses Become “Black Gold”
    International Review of Social Research 2017; 7(1): 22–30 Research Article Open Access Rita Vianello The ransom of mussels in the lagoon of Venice: when the louses become “black gold”. DOI 10.1515/irsr-2017-0004 (and still call them today) “peòci”, that is to say louses. Received: February 1, 2016; Accepted: December 20, 2016 They used to consider them not edible and sometimes Abstract: The article presented here is rooted in our doctoral even poisonous. However today, they are known to have research in Ethnology and Social History developed in the an exquisite taste and all the inhabitants eat them as a lagoon of Venice in 2010-2013. It is a research based on the habit. To paraphrase Hobsbawm (Hobsbawm and Ranger methodology of ethnographic field research, in parallel 1983), we are witnessing an example of insular “invented with the bibliographic and archive research. The fieldwork tradition”, applied to the local feeding. The mussels have was conducted between March 2010 and August 2012 become the object of a curious process: if beforehand they with 21 informants, fishermen aged 20 to 90 years. In this were perceived as venomous, as undesirable shells which article we analyze how the formation of a new food taste were damaging fishing nets, they then became a refined is a process that can be defined “cultural”. We can meet an and sought food served in restaurants and in the festive example in the history of mussel-farming on the island of moments and user-friendly. Pellestrina, an island of fishermen in the southern lagoon The main phenomenon of our study is the change of Venice, where the exploitation of this mollusk as food of attitude particularly interesting from an ethnological and economic resource appears rather late in history.
    [Show full text]
  • Venetian Special Occasion Getaway
    For Expert Advice Call A unique occasion deserves 01722 445900 a unique experience. https://italian-short-breaks.co.uk/city/luxury-venice/short/retreat/ Venetian Special Occasion Getaway Break available: March - November 4 days Highlights Most people have been to Venice before, but if you want to return and celebrate a special occasion in style, escaping from the ● Staying in 5 Star San Clemente Palace Kempinski, located crowds has to be high on your priority list. San Clemente Palace on its own Venetian island, away from the crowds Kempinski is the perfect blend of being away from the hustle and ● Thrilling Helicopter Ride over Venice and the nearby islands bustle of Venice, but also only 5 minutes away from St Mark's ● Complimentary Watertaxi from the hotel to St Mark's Square Square by complimentary watertaxi. Venice has something for as required everyone, whether it is a romantic gondola ride for 2, a trip to the ● Flexibility to tailor your break how you want nearby islands of Murano and Burano, or an opera experience. ● Flights from many UK regional airports Venice is fortunate in being able to offer not one but two very different opera experiences; the first is a night at the stunningly beautiful La Fenice opera house, the second taking place in a palace with no stage between you and the performers! Day by Day Itinerary DAY 1 Fly to Venice, Private transfer to your hotel and Dinner page 1/11 Fly to Venice and take your meet & greet private watertaxi transfer to your 5 star hotel. San Clemente Palace Kempinski is located on it’s own private island just below Venice, and is the perfect tranquil haven away from the crowds.
    [Show full text]
  • Project of Territorial Governance of Tourism in Venice
    Project of territorial governance of tourism in Venice Project of territorial governance of tourism in Venice 2 Project of territorial governance of tourism in Venice Table of Contents FOREWORD.............................................................................................................................................................7 FIRST PART:...........................................................................................................................................................11 THE START OF A PARTICIPATORY ROUTE.................................................................................................................11 1. The functions of tourism and the regulatory framework...............................................................................13 2. Tourism in Venice..........................................................................................................................................15 3. The resident population................................................................................................................................22 4. The stages of the participatory route.............................................................................................................25 5. Principal mission statements of the projects presented and adopted by the Technical Working Group..........27 SECOND PART:.......................................................................................................................................................43 OPERATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • From Railway Station Santa Lucia / Piazzale Roma from Airport Marco
    S.Alvise Ponte della Libertà Sacca S.Alvise Fond.Dei Riformati Fond. Sacca S.Girolamo Canossiane 8 C.Lun.Penitenti Fond.Contarini Chiesa di C.d.Capitello C.d.Legname S.Alvise Rio S.Alvise C.d.Rotonda ISOLA DI MURANO Campo Fond.Coletti S.Alvise Ospedale Fatebenefratelli C.Capuccine C.d.Riformati Rio S.Girolamo Calle Fondamenta della Sensa C.llo Piave ISOLA DI Fondamenta de le Capuzine Chiesa della S.Girolamo C.Rubini Madonna dell'Orto C.lle Ferau Madonna dell'Orto Fond. de le Case Nove C.Pisani Calle Gradisca S.MICHELE C.te Cavallo Tre Fondamenta S.Girolamo Capitello Fond.Mad.Orto Archi 9 C.l.Piave Chiesa di C.Muneghe Campo S.Michele Corte C.llo Madonna Calle de l'Artigia Zappa d. Battello Fondamenta Ormesini dell'Orto en C.Angelo Fond. G. Contarini Ponte Calle LoredanFond.dei Mori Cristo dei Tre Archi C.Malvas. C.Brazzo C.llo Campo S.Michele Cimitero Cà Pesaro Madonna Nuovo Campo d.Mori Fond. S.Giobbe Corte Calle Scuro del Ghetto dei Vedei C.tintoret. no Basilica di C.d.ColoriMagazz Crea C.2 corti Fondamenta di Cannaregio Museo S.Maria Calle de le Beccarie Ebraico C.Forner e Donato Hotel ScalaVecchio mat. Fondamenta della C.Muti Calle del C.Larga Calle s.Giovanni Museo Paradiso Fond.Savorgnan Sinagoga Fondamente Nove Chiesa di Calle d.Chioverette G.NuovoC.lle d. Masena 24 del Vetro C.llo C.Gropp S.Giobbe Corte Vecchia Calle delle Conterie Soffiador Calle Cereria d. Scuole Misericordia Fond. Abbazia R.T.Crea Fondamenta Venier C.d.Forno Museo C.Busello Fond.
    [Show full text]
  • Mattm 88-89-90; Prov Ve 3.6 Componente "Paesaggio"
    MATTM 88‐89‐90; PROV VE 3.6 COMPONENTE "PAESAGGIO", "BENI ARCHITETTONICI E ARCHEOLOGICI" MATTM88: Elaborare uno studio della visualità (bacini, margini, itinerari, coni visuali) e della percezione visiva (verifica delle relazioni di le varie componenti del paesaggio e tra queste e l'opera), fornendo inoltre opportuni fotosimulazioni per la verifica dell'impatto visuale da e verso l'area dell'intervento, con particolare riferimento al centro storico, indicando i punti di scatto per ognuno di essi e considerando non solo il nuovo tracciato del canale con le relative velme ma anche le sagome, in scala, delle navi che l'attraverseranno nella fase di esercizio. Le fotosimulazioni dovranno, quindi, essere ad altezza osservatore, ante operam e post operam, in numero adeguato rispetto ai principali luoghi d'osservazione e di fruizione del territorio interessato. MATTM89: Chiarire le modalità che hanno portato alla definizione dell’area di influenza riportata nella figura 4.42, in considerazione soprattutto delle dimensioni esigue di detta figura, dalla quale risulta impossibile verificare quali siano, come afferma il Proponente, "i principali assi di comunicazione viaria e marittima, i centri abitati, gli spazi aperti costieri e lagunari che comportano elevata visibilità della zona interessata dagli interventi di progetto" utilizzati per l'inviluppo dell'area. MATTM90: Evitare rimandi alla Relazione Paesaggistica, come accade ad esempio in riferimento al rapporto fra l'opera e la componente paesaggistica (pag. 171 dello SIA), poiché tale Relazione è parte di un'altra procedura. 1 Le componenti del paesaggio che caratterizzano l’area interessata dal progetto sono riconducibili ai “caratteri” individuati nella Variante al Piano Territoriale Regionale di Coordinamento con valenza paesaggistica presentato nel 2013.
    [Show full text]