DOCSLIB.ORG

Fauna Sensitive Road Design

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fauna Sensitive Road Design FAUNA SENSITIVE ROAD DESIGN VOLUME 1 PAST AND EXISTING PRACTICES Fauna Sensitive Road Design. Volume 1, Past and Existing Practices First published February 2000. Reprinted 2002. Published by the Queensland Department of Main Roads, Planning, Design and Environment Division. Copyright © The State of Queensland (Department of Main Roads) 2000. Copyright in this document remains with the Queensland Department of Main Roads. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source and no commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those listed above requires the prior written permission of the Executive Director, Planning, Design and Environment Division. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Principal Manager (Environment), Planning, Design and Environment Division, GPO Box 1412, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia. Disclaimer: information in this document does not necessarily represent Government policy. While this publication has been prepared with care, the Queensland Government accepts no liability for any decisions or actions taken on the basis of this document. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Fauna sensitive road design Bibliography. ISBN 0 7242 9648 (v.1) 1. Roads - Design and construction - Environmental aspects - Australia. 2. Corridors (Ecology) - Australia. 3. Wildlife crossings - Australia. 4 Wildlife conservation - Australia. 5 Roads - Australia Safety measures. 6. Culverts - Australia - Design and construction. I. Queensland Department of Main Roads. Planning, Design and Environment Division. II. Title: Past and existing practices. 625.725 Cite this document as: Queensland Department of Main Roads (2000). Fauna Sensitive Road Design. Volume 1 - Past and Existing Practices. Queensland Department of Main Roads, Planning, Design and Environment Division. Brisbane. Available from: Queensland Department of Main Roads, Planning, Design and Environment Division GPO Box 1412, Brisbane, Qld. 4000. Cover design by Dragon Prints TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 CURRENT LEGISLATION REGARDING FAUNA CONSERVATION 5 3 POPULATION ECOLOGY AND ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR 6 3.1 Theoretical Issues 6 3.2 Behaviour of Animal Species 12 4 WILDLIFE CORRIDORS 16 4.1 Wildlife Corridors as Habitat Linkages 16 4.2 Corridors along Roadsides 18 4.3 Suitability of Vegetated Corridors 19 4.4 Corridor Width 21 5 EFFECTS OF ROADS 22 5.1 Direct Impacts 22 5.2 Indirect Impacts 26 6 EXISTING PRACTICES 29 6.1 Underpasses and Culverts 29 6.2 Overpasses 37 6.3 Exclusion or Guide Fencing 38 6.4 Wildlife Reflectors 42 6.5 Warning Signs 43 7 REVIEW OF FIELD DATA 47 7.1 General Description of the Data 48 7.2 Culvert Size and Type 51 7.3 Vegetation Associated with Culverts 55 7.4 Wet or Dry Passage through Culverts 56 7.5 Wildlife Fencing 57 7.6 Summary of Findings 58 8 CONCLUSIONS 60 8.1 Influence of Animal Behaviour on Impacts of Roads 60 8.2 Fauna Use of Existing Structures 61 8.3 Recommendations for Accommodating Fauna 62 8.4 Overview of Present Management Practices 64 8.5 Future Directions and Research 64 9 REFERENCES 66 APPENDICES A Survey Data from Study of Culverts by AMBS Consulting(1997) B Survey Data from Study of Culverts by Kinhill Pty Ltd (1996) Fauna Sensitive Road Design SUMMARY BACKGROUND Clearing practices in Australia have reduced the area of native habitat available to fauna. Transport corridor infrastructure has not only played a part in the clearing of land, but also in habitat fragmentation. As a consequence of these actions, it is becoming increasingly important that we design and manage transport corridors so as to reduce the impact on Australia’s native fauna species. Research to date has confirmed that transport infrastructure (and in particular roads) has both direct and indirect impacts on fauna. Direct impacts such as road mortalities can be significant for fauna populations with low numbers or widely dispersed individuals. In addition, indirect impacts from barriers to fauna movement, such as fences or embankments, and edge effects, created by vegetation clearing, are known to reduce movement and thus reduce breeding opportunities for many species. The increasing recognition of these impacts has led to the trialling and implementation of measures (or modifications) to improve road design. Measures vary from the installation of structures designed specifically to facilitate or guide fauna movement, to signs intended to increase the awareness of motorists. The installation of many measures in the past was largely driven by perceptions of what structures animals would use. In many cases, post-construction monitoring, or the appropriate maintenance of such structures, was not undertaken, and many structures have now been found to be ineffective. The monitoring of existing structures has increased over recent years, and a better understanding of their utility is being developed. IMPORTANCE OF THIS DOCUMENT The Queensland Department of Main Roads has recognised the importance of planning, designing, constructing and maintaining roads in an ecologically sensitive manner. Although there is a large body of work about transport infrastructure effects on fauna, this information has not been compiled into a form that would help practitioners identify the most appropriate and effective measures to adopt. This volume, ‘Fauna Sensitive Road Design—Past and Existing Practices’, is the first in a two-volume series, and is intended to provide an overview of existing knowledge relating to the impact of transport infrastructure on fauna, in addition to discussing the methods available to reduce these impacts. It is intended that the second volume, ‘Fauna Sensitive Road Design—Preferred Practices’, will provide a compilation of trials currently being undertaken by Main Roads and other State and international road management agencies. This latter volume will identify which measures are appropriate for facilitating 1 Fauna Sensitive Road Design the safe movement of fauna. For the purposes of these two volumes, fauna has been divided into fauna groups (e.g. small ground dwelling mammals, large ground dwelling mammals, birds, reptiles, etc). COMPILATION OF DATA WITHIN THIS VOLUME This volume discusses the potential impacts of transport infrastructure on fauna. It includes a brief theoretical background to animal behaviour and the function of vegetated corridors so as to help the reader understand the challenges faced when designing infrastructure that is to accommodate fauna movement. Also included in this volume is a review of practices used in road designs to facilitate fauna movement. Two field studies in particular are analysed, and the general trends in effective designs and modifications noted in these studies are discussed. The studies mainly examine drainage structures and the use of these structures by fauna. A general indication of which culvert type facilitates effective movement for each fauna group is provided (see Table 1). It is, however, important to recognise that the data presented in Table 1 is preliminary only, and this data will be consolidated following further studies currently being undertaken and envisaged for inclusion in Volume 2 of this series. Table 1 Confirmed use of culvert or underpass type by fauna (+ indicates known use, - indicates not known or unconfirmed use) Fauna type Small pipe Large pipe Small box Large box Bridge <0.5 m >0.5 m culvert culvert underpass diameter diameter <1.2 m high >1.2 m high Small mammal + + + + + Medium mammal + + + - + Large mammal - + - + + Semi-arboreal mammal¹ - - - +* +* Arboreal mammal² - - - - - Microchiropteran bats³ - - - + + Reptile - + - + + Bird + - - + + Amphibian + - + + + Introduced predator + + + + + * The only semi-arboreal mammals recorded in fauna tunnels are the Koala and Eastern Pygmy Possum. These species are not considered to be exclusively arboreal. 1 Semi-arboreal mammal is one that spends the majority of time in trees but is also known to travel on the ground (e.g the Koala). 2 Arboreal mammals are tree-dwelling mammals (e.g. the Sugar Glider). 3 Microchiropteran bats are the small, insect-eating bats. 2 Fauna Sensitive Road Design A synopsis of successful measures that facilitate fauna movement is included in Chapter 8 of Volume 1. Key findings include: • Culverts of a size appropriate for the safe passage of numerous fauna types, rather than just one or a few fauna types, should be installed. • The provision of dry passage within underpasses or culverts is preferable. Multiple cell culverts with the outer cells raised, or raised ledges within a culvert, will greatly assist fauna movement. • Revegetation using locally indigenous plant species is suggested for the entrances of culverts. This provides an extension of habitat nearer to culvert entrances and thus provides shelter for fauna entering and exiting culverts. • Wildlife fencing associated with culverts has proven to be effective in guiding animals into culverts and reducing road deaths. Fences installed on one side of the road only have not been found to reduce fauna road-kills. • Ongoing maintenance of fences is essential to maintain their effectiveness. In particular, Koala- proof fences (unlike wildlife fences) require maintenance so that trees do not grow within 3 m of the fence. This ensures that Koalas do not climb the trees and jump the fence. FUTURE RESEARCH The final section of this volume identifies those areas that require research so
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Invertebrate Survey of the A30 and A38 Road Verges in Area 1 (Cornwall and Devon) Steven Falk Mark Tunmore October 2015
    Inspiring change for Important Invertebrate Areas in the UK Invertebrate Survey of the A30 and A38 road verges in Area 1 (Cornwall and Devon) 11th September 2014 Susan Thompson - Grants & Trusts Officer Steven Falk Mark Tunmore Saving the small things that run the planet October 2015 1 Executive summary Between late May and late August 2015, Buglife Services carried out an invertebrate survey of the A30 and A38 in Devon and Cornwall. 41 visits to 23 sample points were undertaken on the A30 and 25 visits to 18 sampling points were undertaken on the A38, and a range of invertebrate groups were targeted. 866 taxa were recorded, the list being dominated by flies (361), beetles (177), butterflies & moths (109), bugs (82), bees, ants & aculeate wasps (53), spiders & harvestmen (50), grasshoppers & crickets (11) and dragonflies & damselflies (11). Pitfall trapping (not permitted) would have extended the beetle and bug lists greatly. The list included a number of rare and scarce species (notably the tachinid fly Policheta unicolor and lygaeid bug Trapezonotus ullrichi) and seemingly the first SW England record for the Southern oak bush-cricket (Meconema meridionalis) which is a recent British colonist. The list reveals the tremendous variety of life cycle strategies and other ecological relationships associated with road verge invertebrates. Pollinators are very well represented within the species list. The list and sample sizes reveal the strong influence of surrounding habitat, geographic location, altitude and underlying geology/ground conditions. There is a discernible ‘Bodmin Moor effect’ (decreased abundance and diversity of thermophilic invertebrates with altitude) and a strong ‘Dartmoor effect’ (increased abundance and diversity of thermophilic invertebrates on the A38 east of Dartmoor).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Strategies for Species/Populations Occurring Outside Protected Areas
    ES_CWR_30-11 30/11/10 14:33 Page 253 Chapter 11 Conservation Strategies for Species/Populations Occurring Outside Protected Areas More than 90 per cent of the terrestrial surface of the earth is not covered by any form of protected area category. If this situation does not change, there will be severe loss of biological wealth in the next few decades (Halladay and Gilmour, 1995). Aims and purpose Given that national parks and other conservation areas cover only 12 to 13 per cent of the earth’s surface in total, it is clear that these areas alone will not ensure the survival of species and ecological communities, even without the impacts of accelerated global change. It is crucial, therefore, that lands outside national reserve networks be managed in ways that allow as much biodiversity as possible to be maintained. The in situ conservation of species outside protected areas, where the majority of them occur, is a seriously neglected aspect of biodiversity conservation and in the face of global change it must demand much further atten- tion from governments and conservation agencies.This approach is also known as off-reserve management (Hale and Lamb, 1997). This approach should also be seen within the context of integrating protected areas within wider landscapes, seascapes and natural resource policies (Ervin et al, 2010), one of the benefits being to achieve additional conservation benefits outside of protected areas (Box 11.1). Other reasons for paying more attention to the conservation of resources in land outside protected areas are given by Torquebiau and Taylor (2009): • Farming and land management practices strongly influence available natural resources and biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • ' Victoria's Biodiversity: – Directions in Management'
    ' Victoria's Biodiversity: – Directions in Management' _ Crown (State of Victoria) 1997 Copyright in photographs and fine art remains with the photographers and artists unless otherwise stated Published by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria This document in conjunction with 'Victoria's Biodiversity — Our Living Wealth' and 'Victoria's Biodiversity — Sustaining Our Living Wealth' comprise the Strategy required under Section 17 of the 'Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act' 1988. Produced by the Secretary, Department of Natural Resources and Environment. This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for private study, research, criticism or review allowed under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright holder. ISBN 0 7306 6763 4 Project co-ordination — David Meagher Design & production — O2 Design Film & printing — D & D Printing Printed on recycled paper to help conserve our natural environment 2 Victorian Biodiversity in the Year 2020: A History of the Future Throughout the world, Victoria has been recognised for over a decade as the premier state in Australia for the protection and enhancement of its biodiversity assets. It has the nation's most comprehensive reserve system forming the cornerstone for the sustainable use of Victoria's terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. In 2020, these 'jewels in Victoria's crown' are highly valued by the local community and international visitors. As our understanding of the biodiversity of Victoria increased many 'conservation' issues were resolved because there was an increased awareness of what each component added to the health of the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitchell Shire Council
    ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING UNDER SEPARATE COVER ATTACHMENTS 21 MARCH 2016 MITCHELL SHIRE COUNCIL Council Meeting Attachment ENGINEERING AND INFRASTRUCTURE 21 MARCH 2016 9.1 DRAFT RURAL ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016-2026 Attachment No: 1 Draft Rural Roadside Environmental Management Plan 2016-2026 MITCHELL SHIRE COUNCIL Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Aim .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Council’s Responsibility for Roadsides .................................................................................................... 5 Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 What is a Roadside? ............................................................................................................................ 6 The Maintenance Envelope ................................................................................................................ 6 VicRoads Controlled Roads ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Supply 3.31 Australia’S North Has Enormous Gas Reserves Which Could Provide a Cost Effective Domestic Energy Supply.183
    3 Development Proposals Overview 3.1 The Committee has received many proposals for major capital infrastructure developments which would require direct government funding for facilitation. 3.2 This chapter lists these proposals and briefly identifies preconditions needed for them to proceed. The proposals are listed by category, then alphabetically. The projects described in this chapter are priority-listed in Chapter 5. Road Infrastructure Proposals 3.3 Roads are the vital connection for service delivery and the transport of produce between regional towns and centres across the nation. The condition of roads in the North is variable, with many being unsealed, or partially sealed, and subject to seasonal flooding.1 National Highways and Major Arterial Roads Bruce Highway—upgrading for flood mitigation, safety and capacity improvement north and south of Mackay and the provision of a dual carriageway between Edmonton and Gordonvale would sustain major developments north of Cairns and secure access to southern ports during severe weather events.2 Federal funding of $6.7 billion has been allocated 1 Australian Government, Green Paper on Developing Northern Australia, Canberra 2014, p. 33. 2 Mr Andre Wessells, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Regional Development Australia (RDA) Mackay–Isaac–Whitsunday, Committee Hansard, Mackay, 31 March 2014, pp. 1–2; Mr Tim Miles, Chair, Mackay Region Chamber of Commerce, Committee Hansard, Mackay, 31 March 72 PIVOT NORTH for upgrades over 10 years which include $3 billion for north Queensland.3 Central Arnhem Highway—Katherine to Nhulunbuy, Northern Territory—upgrading, with further upgrades of the Stuart Highway, would support community and industry development after the closure of Rio Tinto Alcan’s bauxite refinery in late 2014.4 Great Northern Highway—Pilbara and Kimberley region to Port Hedland, Western Australia—upgrading would improve the Pilbara– Kimberley road network.
    [Show full text]
  • Catoctin Mountain Scenic Byway Plan
    Corridor Management Plan for the US 15 Catoctin Mountain Scenic Byway April 2004 Prepared for: Prepared by: Frederick County, Maryland Lardner/Klein Landscape Architects, P.C. as part of in association with the State of Maryland Scenic Byway Program Daniel Consultants, Inc. John Milner Associates Bay Area Economics Watson Heritage Strategies Shelley Mastran Advisory Committee Marcel Aillery, Carollton Manor Land Trust Sister Joan Angermari, St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Shrine Robert Black, Catoctin Mountain Orchard Nancy Bodmer, President, Carrollton Manor Land Trust Don Briggs, President, Emmitsburg Business & Professional Association G. Bernard Callan, Jr., Fredrick County Historic Preservation Commission Sam Castleman, Resident Joy Clem, Resident Colin Clevenger, Curator, Children’s Museum of Rose Hill Manor Ray Compton, Frederick County Historic Trust John Concannon, Maryland State Highway Administration District 7 Dean Considine, Central Maryland Heritage League Judy Crum, Resident, Frederick County *Janet Davis, Frederick County Division of Planning Tim Davis, City of Frederick Jennifer Dougherty, Mayor, City of Frederick Dale Dowling, Architectural & Cultural Historian Sister Carol Durkin, St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Shrine Cynthia Ecker, Park Manager, Cunningham Falls State Park Richard Fairley, Headmaster, Director Of Development, Prospect Hall Mansion Doug Faris, Superintendent, C&O Canal National Hisotrical Park *John Fieseler, Executive Director, Tourism Council of Frederick County, Inc. Dean Fitzgerald, President, Frederick County
    [Show full text]
  • 4X4 Routes National Parks Fishing in the Outback
    4x4 Routes National Parks Fishing in the Outback 2008 EDITION BIRDSVILLE – BEDOURIE – BIG RED AND BEYOND… Adventure Diamantina! Call now for a copy of the new ‘Visitors Guide’, ‘Remote Desert Travel’ and ‘Bird Watching Guide’. Birdsville • Bedourie • Betoota Four Wheel Drive Challenges Splendour of the Outback Sophisticated Services Cross the Simpson Desert Wildflower Splendour Restaurants Hotels, Motels Explore Diamantina National Park Therapeutic hot artesian spa Cafés Caravan Parks, Cabins Travel to Poepels Corner Abundant wildlife Coffee shops Bush camping Test your skill on Big Red Land of the rugged beauty Art galleries Fuel & Auto services Diamantina Visitors Centres call 1300 794 257 Wirrarri Visitors Centre Bedourie Visitors Centre Birdsville Qld Bedourie Qld E: [email protected] E: [email protected] www.diamantina.qld.gov.au 2 www.outbackholidays.infowww.outbackholidays.info Check out Queensland’s backyard Want to get off the beaten track and experience some of Queensland's relatively undiscovered Outback? There are plenty of opportunities to go bush taking Contents forgotten roads meandering through spectacular Outback scenery and hidden bush towns where there are many colourful characters to meet. PAGE Station Stays 4 We've put together a collection of some of the best four-wheel driving tracks in Queensland's Outback. They'll take you through some amazing country – from Fishing 4 rugged jump-ups to peaceful billabongs, and from the channel country to desert Dinosaurs & Fossils 5 dunes. Great Outback Pubs 6 Feel the lure of discovering a whole new world of Outback adventure – where Opal & Gem Fossicking 6 there's time for you to toss in a line, spin a yarn or share a cup of billy tea with new friends beside a peaceful billabong.
    [Show full text]
  • Linkages in the Landscape
    >GJ=KL =;GKQKL=EK ;GFK=JNAF? /LQNDJHVLQWKH/DQGVFDSH 7KH5ROHRI&RUULGRUVDQG&RQQHFWLYLW\ LQ:LOGOLIH&RQVHUYDWLRQ $QGUHZ)%HQQHWW ,8&1)RUHVW&RQVHUYDWLRQ3URJUDPPH &RQVHUYLQJ)RUHVW(FRV\VWHPV6HULHV1R 7KH:RUOG&RQVHUYDWLRQ8QLRQ Linkages in theLinkages in the Landscape Landscape IUCN’S FOREST CONSERVATION PROGRAMME IUCN’s Forest Conservation Programme coordinates and supports the activities of the IUCN Secretariat and members working with forest ecosystems. The goal of forest conservation is achieved through promoting protection, restoration and sustainable use of forest resources, so that forests provide the full potential range of goods and services. The programme makes contributions to policy at various levels and uses field projects to derive lessons to feed into the policy debate. The principles of Caring for the Earth, published jointly by IUCN, WWF and UNEP in 1991, are applied to these projects, which combine the needs of conservation and those of local communities. One major activity is to develop coherent and informed policies on forest conservation in order to advocate the translation of policies into effective actions. IUCN frequently advises major development institutions on forest issues, to ensure that conservation priorities are adequately addressed in their projects and programmes. The Forest Conservation Programme receives generous financial support from the Government of the Netherlands. The IUCN Forest Conservation Programme Linkages in the Landscape The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation Andrew F. Bennett School of Ecology and Environment Deakin University – Melbourne Campus, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia IUCN – The World Conservation Union 2003 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or Environment Australia concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the Land Conservation Council
    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL SOUTH GIPPSLAND AREA DISTRICT 2 FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS November 1982 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s South Gippsland Area District 2 Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 26 June 1984, and formal amendments and revocations. Subsequent changes may not have been incorporated. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origin of changes. MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL S.G. McL. Dimmick, B.A., B.Com., Dip.Soc.Stud. (Chairman) A. Mitchell, M.Agr.Sc., D.D.A.; Chairman, Soil Conservation Authority (Deputy Chairman) J.R. Ashworth, E.D., Dip.C.E., M.I.E.Aust.; Secretary For Lands C. N. Austin, C.B.E. T.H. Gunnersen, B.com., M.SC. J. Lindros, Ph.C. J.S. Rogerson, B.C.E., E.W.S., F.I.E. Aust.; Deputy Chairman, State Rivers and Water Supply Commission D.S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director of National Parks D.F. Smith, B.Agr.Sc., M.Agr.Sc., Ph.D., Dip.Ed., M.ed.Admin.; Director General of Agriculture D. Spencer-Jones, B.Sc., Ph.D.; Deputy Secretary for Minerals and Energy G.L. Swartz, B.Agr. Sc., M. Agr. Sc.; Director of Fisheries and Wildlife A.J. Threader, B.Sc.F., Dip.For. (Cres.), M.I.F.A.; Chairman, Forests Commission, Victoria CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 4 A. PARKS AND MARINE RESERVES 8 B. REFERENCE AREAS 22 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Perception and Sustainable Roadside Vegetation Management Strategies
    PUBLIC PERCEPTION AND SUSTAINABLE ROADSIDE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES Anne Lucey Plant and Soil Sciences University of Delaware Newark DE 19716 Telephone: 302-740-1979 [email protected] (Corresponding Author) Susan Barton, Ph.D. Plant and Soil Sciences University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716 Telephone: 302-831-1375 [email protected] October 29, 2010 6,184 words (Abstract: 248, Manuscript: 4904, References: 1032) + 4 figures (4 x 250words) = 7,184 words ABSTRACT Sustainable roadside vegetation management strategies limit the amount of non-native turf grass and include meadows of native warm season grasses and/or flowering perennials, and masses of native shrubs and trees. Sustainably managed roadsides can contribute to a matrix of economically conservative, environmentally responsible and aesthetically pleasing landscapes. Implementation of sustainable strategies may result in cost savings, better water quality and hydraulic conductivity, improved safety measures, increased biodiversity, benefits to the socioeconomic health of the state and conformity to state and federal legislation. Sustainable strategies only provide optimal cost savings and enhancemen t of environmental stewardship when implemented consistently. Aesthetically, sustainable landscapes often represent a departure from the traditional expectation of how a roadside landscape should appear. Lacking an awareness of the inherent values present in sustainably managed roadsides, the public is often hesitant to accept this atypical, and oftentimes less manicured aesthetic, causing many Department’s of Transportation (DOTs) to revert to traditional management regimes. Many state DOTs maintain active ties to the public and political communities of their state and acquiesce to the wishes of these communities when appropriate. Because they are often called upon to defend their design, management and operating procedures, DOTs have a new role in raising awareness, assessing perception and informing the public about the benefits associated with sustainable roadside vegetation management strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadside Diversity in Relation to Age and Surrounding Source Habitat: Evidence for Long Time Lags in Valuable Green Infrastructure
    Received: 23 March 2020 Revised: 24 March 2020 Accepted: 24 March 2020 DOI: 10.1002/2688-8319.12005 RESEARCH ARTICLE Roadside diversity in relation to age and surrounding source habitat: evidence for long time lags in valuable green infrastructure Alistair G. Auffret1,2 Evelina Lindgren2 1Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden 2Biogeography and Geomatics, Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden Correspondence Alistair G. Auffret, Department of Ecology, Abstract Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 1. The severe and ongoing decline in semi-natural grassland habitat during the past two Uppsala, Sweden. Email: [email protected] centuries means that it is important to consider how other, marginal grassland habitat elements can contribute to landscape-level biodiversity, and under what circumstances. Funding information Swedish Research Council Formas, Grant/Award 2. Toexamine how habitat age and the amount of core grassland habitat in the surround- Number: 2015-1065 ing landscape affect diversity in green infrastructure, we carried out inventories of 36 rural road verges that were either historical (pre-1901) or modern (established post- 1901 and before 1975), and were surrounded by relatively high (>15%) or low (<5%) levels of grassland habitat. We recorded the number of plant species, grassland special- ists, grassland conservation species and the fraction of the landscape’s species and spe- cialists found in the road verge. 3. Road verge communities were characterised by high levels of grassland specialist species (35% of the 161 species recorded), with road verge sites supporting 15–20% of the specialist species found in the surrounding 25 km2 landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Roadsides: a Guide for Rating Conservation Value
    Assessing Roadsides: A guide for rating conservation value Compiled by Kate Jackson Published by the Western Australian Roadside Conservation Committee This work is copyright. Apart from any use under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Roadside Conservation Committee Western Australia. Direct enquiries to the Executive Officer, Roadside Conservation Committee Western Australia, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery, Bentley, 6983 Western Australia. First published Dec 2002 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data: Roadside Conservation, Survey roadside vegetation and weeds 1st Edition ISBN 0 7307 58990 ©Roadside Conservation Committee, Western Australia 2002 Graphic Design and layout by Tim Harvey Front cover photo: Dr Ken Atkins Cartoons by Terry Roberts Printed by Advance Press Contents Part 1 – Introduction to Roadsides 1 The Value of Roadsides 2 Habitat Fragmentation 3 Wildlife Corridors 4 Rare and Threatened Species 5 Where are Roadside Corridors? 6 Why Survey Roadside Vegetation? 8 The Role of the Community 9 Definitions 10 Part 2 – Surveying Roadsides 13 Before You Start the Survey 14 Timing 14 Training 15 Gathering Information 15 Coordinating Your Survey 15 Survey Procedure 16 Changing Sections 17 Completing the Survey Sheet 19 Width of Road Reserve 19 Width of Vegetated Roadside 19 Native Vegetation on Roadside 20 Rare Flora 21 Extent of Native Vegetation Along Roadside 21 Number of Different Native Species 22 Weeds 22 Types of Weeds 23 Fauna Observed 24 Value as a Biological Corridor 26 Predominant Adjoining Landuse 27 Utilities/disturbances 28 Conservation Value 29 Landscape Value 30 General Comments 31 Part 1 Introduction to Roadsides The total length of Australian roads would circle the equator more than 40 times.
    [Show full text]