DOCSLIB.ORG

Catoctin Mountain Scenic Byway Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Catoctin Mountain Scenic Byway Plan Corridor Management Plan for the US 15 Catoctin Mountain Scenic Byway April 2004 Prepared for: Prepared by: Frederick County, Maryland Lardner/Klein Landscape Architects, P.C. as part of in association with the State of Maryland Scenic Byway Program Daniel Consultants, Inc. John Milner Associates Bay Area Economics Watson Heritage Strategies Shelley Mastran Advisory Committee Marcel Aillery, Carollton Manor Land Trust Sister Joan Angermari, St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Shrine Robert Black, Catoctin Mountain Orchard Nancy Bodmer, President, Carrollton Manor Land Trust Don Briggs, President, Emmitsburg Business & Professional Association G. Bernard Callan, Jr., Fredrick County Historic Preservation Commission Sam Castleman, Resident Joy Clem, Resident Colin Clevenger, Curator, Children’s Museum of Rose Hill Manor Ray Compton, Frederick County Historic Trust John Concannon, Maryland State Highway Administration District 7 Dean Considine, Central Maryland Heritage League Judy Crum, Resident, Frederick County *Janet Davis, Frederick County Division of Planning Tim Davis, City of Frederick Jennifer Dougherty, Mayor, City of Frederick Dale Dowling, Architectural & Cultural Historian Sister Carol Durkin, St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Shrine Cynthia Ecker, Park Manager, Cunningham Falls State Park Richard Fairley, Headmaster, Director Of Development, Prospect Hall Mansion Doug Faris, Superintendent, C&O Canal National Hisotrical Park *John Fieseler, Executive Director, Tourism Council of Frederick County, Inc. Dean Fitzgerald, President, Frederick County Covered Bridge Preservation Society Rebecca Fitzgerald, Mt. St. Mary’s College Archives Clem and Harriet Gardiner, Catoctin Furnace Historical Society Jim Gugel, Frederick County Division of Planning *Ed Gorski, Chief of Comprehensive Planning, Frederick County Division of Planning Richard Griffin, Director, Department of Economic Development, City of Frederick Richard Hahn, Director , Catoctin Wildlife Preserve & Zoo *Charles Heath, Frederick County Division of Planning Michael Hillman, Emmitsburg Historical Society Mark Hudson, Executive Director, Historical Society of Frederick County Toni Lake, Senior Warden, St. Paul’s Episcopal Church *Carole Larson, Frederick County Division of Planning Joe Lebherz, Frederick County Chamber of Commerce Mary and Harold Long, Residents John Lovell, County Commissioner, Frederick County Joseph Lubozynski, President, Frederick County Landmarks Foundation Inc. Hank Ludder, Director, Frederick County Landmarks Foundation/ Schifferstadt Museum Frances Lynch, Maryland Christmas Show Jack Lynch, Monocacy Archaeological Society Mark Lynch, Lynfield Tom Lynch, Committee for Frederick County, C/O Miles & Stockbridge Mark Maas, Assistant Manager, Cunningham Falls State Park *Terry Maxwell, Scenic Byway Coordinator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Office of Environmental Design Kara Norman, Executive Director, Greater Frederick Development Corporation Neil Parrott, P.E., Traffic Transportation Engineer, Maryland State Highway Administration Doug Peterson, Seton Shrine Kristie Poehler, Hampton Inn, Frederick/Battlefield Journal Mel Poole, Superintendent, Catoctin Mountain Park Elizabeth Prongas, North Frederick County Consortium Sister Mary Clare Hughes, Administrator, National Shrine of Saint Elizabeth Ann Seton Robert Shen, Division of Public Works, Frederick County George Smith, Planning Commission, City of Frederick Carol Spoonhour, Administrative Assistant, Grotto of Lourdes/Mt. St. Mary’s Mark Spurrier, Park Naturalist, Cunningham Falls State Park Dianne Walbrecker, Parks and Recreation Committee/Citizen, Town of Emmitsburg John Wolf, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Watershed Management and Analysis Division George Wunderlich, Executive Director, National Museum of Civil War Medecine Barbara Wyatt, Staff, Frederick Town Historic District Commision * On Management Team Corridor Management Plan for the US 15 Catoctin Mountain Scenic Byway April 2004 Prepared for: Prepared by: Frederick County, Maryland Lardner/Klein Landscape Architects, P.C. as part of in association with the State of Maryland Scenic Byway Program Daniel Consultants, Inc. John Milner Associates Bay Area Economics Watson Heritage Strategies Shelley Mastran Funded in part by the Federal Highway Administration Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 The Catoctin Mountains ........................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Purpose of the Plan ............................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Planning Context and Process .............................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Ongoing Public Involvement................................................................................... 1-4 Chapter 2: The Catoctin Mountain Scenic Byway.............................................................. 2-1 2.1 Corridor Definition ............................................................................................... 2-1 Byway Route .................................................................................................... 2-1 Related Landscapes ......................................................................................... 2-2 Related Linkages .............................................................................................. 2-3 Byway Regions ................................................................................................. 2-4 2.2 Related Programs and Projects ............................................................................ 2-5 2.3 Existing Facilities and Services ............................................................................. 2-6 Existing Visitor Attractions ................................................................................ 2-6 Existing Visitor Services ................................................................................... 2-6 2.4 Existing Roadway Conditions ................................................................................ 2-7 Road Classification and Volume ....................................................................... 2-7 Highway Safety and Roadway Character Issues ............................................. 2-8 Planned Improvements..................................................................................... 2-8 2.5 Vision, Goals, and Objectives ............................................................................... 2-10 Resource Conservation and Enhancement: ..................................................... 2-10 Tourism and Visitor Management ..................................................................... 2-12 Interpretation and Education ............................................................................ 2-13 Transportation/Traffic Safety............................................................................. 2-14 Roadside Character.......................................................................................... 2-15 Coordination and Management ........................................................................ 2-16 Chapter 3: Intrinsic Qualities ................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Scenic Quality ........................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Historic Quality ....................................................................................................... 3-4 3.3 Recreational Quality ............................................................................................... 3-16 3.4 Natural Quality........................................................................................................ 3-19 3.5: Archeological Quality ............................................................................................. 3-21 3.6: Cultural Quality ...................................................................................................... 3-22 Chapter 4: Byway Management Strategies......................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Conserving the Intrinsic Qualities along the Byway ............................................... 4-1 Byway Conservation Easement Program ......................................................... 4-3 Agricultural Land Preservation Districts............................................................ 4-3 Frederick County’s Agricultural Land Preservation Program ............................ 4-3 Rural Legacy Areas .......................................................................................... 4-4 Private Forest Conservation Programs ............................................................ 4-5 Watershed Related Conservation Efforts ......................................................... 4-7 Preservation of Historic Sites ........................................................................... 4-8 Community Design ........................................................................................... 4-11 4.2 Tourism and Visitor Management .......................................................................... 4-19 Meeting Visitor Expectations ............................................................................ 4-20 Potential Markets .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CATOCTIN MOUNTAIN PARK a Resource Assessment
    ® 006 march 2 CATOCTIN MOUNTAIN PARK A Resource Assessment National Parks Conservation Association Protecting Parks for Future Generations® ® Center for State of the Parks More than a century ago, Congress established Yellowstone as the CONTENTS world’s first national park. That single act was the beginning of a remarkable and ongoing effort to protect this nation’s natural, his- torical, and cultural heritage. Today, Americans are learning that national park designation REPORT SUMMARY 1 alone cannot provide full resource protection. Many parks are com- promised by development of adjacent lands, air and water pollution, invasive plants and animals, and rapid increases in motorized recre- KEY FINDINGS 5 ation. Park officials often lack adequate information on the status of and trends in conditions of critical resources. The National Parks Conservation Association initiated the State of the Parks® program in 2000 to assess the condition of natural and THE CATOCTIN ASSESSMENT cultural resources in the parks, and determine how well equipped the 7 National Park Service is to protect the parks—its stewardship capaci- ty. The goal is to provide information that will help policy-makers, NATURAL RESOURCES 7 the public, and the National Park Service improve conditions in Park Provides Haven for Wildlife national parks, celebrate successes as models for other parks, and and Urbanites ensure a lasting legacy for future generations. For more information about the methodology and research used in preparing this report and to learn more about the Center for State CULTURAL RESOURCES 14 of the Parks®, visit www.npca.org/stateoftheparks or contact: NPCA, Park’s History Includes Prehistoric Center for State of the Parks®, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Survey of the A30 and A38 Road Verges in Area 1 (Cornwall and Devon) Steven Falk Mark Tunmore October 2015
    Inspiring change for Important Invertebrate Areas in the UK Invertebrate Survey of the A30 and A38 road verges in Area 1 (Cornwall and Devon) 11th September 2014 Susan Thompson - Grants & Trusts Officer Steven Falk Mark Tunmore Saving the small things that run the planet October 2015 1 Executive summary Between late May and late August 2015, Buglife Services carried out an invertebrate survey of the A30 and A38 in Devon and Cornwall. 41 visits to 23 sample points were undertaken on the A30 and 25 visits to 18 sampling points were undertaken on the A38, and a range of invertebrate groups were targeted. 866 taxa were recorded, the list being dominated by flies (361), beetles (177), butterflies & moths (109), bugs (82), bees, ants & aculeate wasps (53), spiders & harvestmen (50), grasshoppers & crickets (11) and dragonflies & damselflies (11). Pitfall trapping (not permitted) would have extended the beetle and bug lists greatly. The list included a number of rare and scarce species (notably the tachinid fly Policheta unicolor and lygaeid bug Trapezonotus ullrichi) and seemingly the first SW England record for the Southern oak bush-cricket (Meconema meridionalis) which is a recent British colonist. The list reveals the tremendous variety of life cycle strategies and other ecological relationships associated with road verge invertebrates. Pollinators are very well represented within the species list. The list and sample sizes reveal the strong influence of surrounding habitat, geographic location, altitude and underlying geology/ground conditions. There is a discernible ‘Bodmin Moor effect’ (decreased abundance and diversity of thermophilic invertebrates with altitude) and a strong ‘Dartmoor effect’ (increased abundance and diversity of thermophilic invertebrates on the A38 east of Dartmoor).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Strategies for Species/Populations Occurring Outside Protected Areas
    ES_CWR_30-11 30/11/10 14:33 Page 253 Chapter 11 Conservation Strategies for Species/Populations Occurring Outside Protected Areas More than 90 per cent of the terrestrial surface of the earth is not covered by any form of protected area category. If this situation does not change, there will be severe loss of biological wealth in the next few decades (Halladay and Gilmour, 1995). Aims and purpose Given that national parks and other conservation areas cover only 12 to 13 per cent of the earth’s surface in total, it is clear that these areas alone will not ensure the survival of species and ecological communities, even without the impacts of accelerated global change. It is crucial, therefore, that lands outside national reserve networks be managed in ways that allow as much biodiversity as possible to be maintained. The in situ conservation of species outside protected areas, where the majority of them occur, is a seriously neglected aspect of biodiversity conservation and in the face of global change it must demand much further atten- tion from governments and conservation agencies.This approach is also known as off-reserve management (Hale and Lamb, 1997). This approach should also be seen within the context of integrating protected areas within wider landscapes, seascapes and natural resource policies (Ervin et al, 2010), one of the benefits being to achieve additional conservation benefits outside of protected areas (Box 11.1). Other reasons for paying more attention to the conservation of resources in land outside protected areas are given by Torquebiau and Taylor (2009): • Farming and land management practices strongly influence available natural resources and biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Ridge Anticlinorium in Central Virginia
    VILLARD S. GRIFFIN, JR. Department of Chemistry and Geology, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29631 Fabric Relationships Across the Catoctin Mountain- Blue Ridge Anticlinorium in Central Virginia ABSTRACT a subhorizontal northeast-bearing lineation. A diagram of poles to mica cleavages defines Study of planar and linear subfabrics across a subfabric characterized by a complete girdle the Catoctin Mountain-Blue Ridge anticlin- similar to the s-pole T-girdle, but having a orium in central Virginia suggests distinct /3 pole bearing 17 degrees closer to due north. differences in the kinematic history of the The Catoctin Mountain-Blue Ridge anti- core and flanks of the anticlinorium. The clinorium in central Virginia is similar to its Precambrian basement complex gneisses in extension in Maryland and Pennsylvania and the core of the anticlinorium record the possesses the same cleavage and foliation fan effects of penetrative deformation in the a evident in the anticlinorium there. The anti- direction. Maxima of mica cleavage poles clinorium in central Virginia, however, has form a complete girdle subnormal to the fewer similarities with the Grandfather pronounced down-dip lineation of elongated Mountain Window area southwestward in minerals. Northeast-striking foliation pro- North Carolina. Like the rocks in the Window duces well-defined maxima that have a poorly area, the Precambrian basement rocks in the developed partial ir-girdle. anticlinorium are profoundly deformed Piedmont rocks in the James River syn- cataclastically and have a pronounced cata- clinorium, on the eastern limb of the Catoctin clastic a lineation. Unlike the rocks in the Mountain-Blue Ridge anticlinorium have an Window area, those in the Piedmont part of s-surface pattern somewhat similar to that of the anticlinorium do not have a pronounced the basement gneisses, but with a better de- cataclastic fabric.
    [Show full text]
  • ' Victoria's Biodiversity: – Directions in Management'
    ' Victoria's Biodiversity: – Directions in Management' _ Crown (State of Victoria) 1997 Copyright in photographs and fine art remains with the photographers and artists unless otherwise stated Published by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria This document in conjunction with 'Victoria's Biodiversity — Our Living Wealth' and 'Victoria's Biodiversity — Sustaining Our Living Wealth' comprise the Strategy required under Section 17 of the 'Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act' 1988. Produced by the Secretary, Department of Natural Resources and Environment. This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for private study, research, criticism or review allowed under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright holder. ISBN 0 7306 6763 4 Project co-ordination — David Meagher Design & production — O2 Design Film & printing — D & D Printing Printed on recycled paper to help conserve our natural environment 2 Victorian Biodiversity in the Year 2020: A History of the Future Throughout the world, Victoria has been recognised for over a decade as the premier state in Australia for the protection and enhancement of its biodiversity assets. It has the nation's most comprehensive reserve system forming the cornerstone for the sustainable use of Victoria's terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. In 2020, these 'jewels in Victoria's crown' are highly valued by the local community and international visitors. As our understanding of the biodiversity of Victoria increased many 'conservation' issues were resolved because there was an increased awareness of what each component added to the health of the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park Meghan Lindsey University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Tampa Library Faculty and Staff ubP lications Tampa Library 2008 Let's Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park Meghan Lindsey University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/tlib_facpub Part of the Education Commons Scholar Commons Citation Lindsey, Meghan, "Let's Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park" (2008). Tampa Library Faculty and Staff Publications. 1. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/tlib_facpub/1 This Data is brought to you for free and open access by the Tampa Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tampa Library Faculty and Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SSACgnp.RA776.ML1.1 Let’s Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park How many Calories will you burn off hiking a five-mile loop trail? Core Quantitative Literacy Topics Slope; contour maps Core Geoscience Subject Topographic maps Supporting Quantitative Literacy Topics Unit Conversions Arctangent, radians Reading Graphs Image from: http://www.nps.gov/cato Ratios and Proportions Percent increase Meghan Lindsey Department of Geology, University of South Florida, Tampa 33620 © 2008 University of South Florida Libraries. All rights reserved. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number NSF DUE-0836566. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. 1 Getting started After completing this module you should be able to: • use Excel spreadsheet to make your calculations.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitchell Shire Council
    ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING UNDER SEPARATE COVER ATTACHMENTS 21 MARCH 2016 MITCHELL SHIRE COUNCIL Council Meeting Attachment ENGINEERING AND INFRASTRUCTURE 21 MARCH 2016 9.1 DRAFT RURAL ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016-2026 Attachment No: 1 Draft Rural Roadside Environmental Management Plan 2016-2026 MITCHELL SHIRE COUNCIL Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Aim .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Council’s Responsibility for Roadsides .................................................................................................... 5 Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 What is a Roadside? ............................................................................................................................ 6 The Maintenance Envelope ................................................................................................................ 6 VicRoads Controlled Roads ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trips Guide Book for Photographers Revised 2008 a Publication of the Northern Virginia Alliance of Camera Clubs
    Field Trips Guide Book for Photographers Revised 2008 A publication of the Northern Virginia Alliance of Camera Clubs Copyright 2008. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced or copied in any manner whatsoever. 1 Preface This field trips guide book has been written by Dave Carter and Ed Funk of the Northern Virginia Photographic Society, NVPS. Both are experienced and successful field trip organizers. Joseph Miller, NVPS, coordinated the printing and production of this guide book. In our view, field trips can provide an excellent opportunity for camera club members to find new subject matter to photograph, and perhaps even more important, to share with others the love of making pictures. Photography, after all, should be enjoyable. The pleasant experience of an outing together with other photographers in a picturesque setting can be stimulating as well as educational. It is difficullt to consistently arrange successful field trips, particularly if the club's membership is small. We hope this guide book will allow camera club members to become more active and involved in field trip activities. There are four camera clubs that make up the Northern Virginia Alliance of Camera Clubs McLean, Manassas-Warrenton, Northern Virginia and Vienna. All of these clubs are located within 45 minutes or less from each other. It is hoped that each club will be receptive to working together to plan and conduct field trip activities. There is an enormous amount of work to properly arrange and organize many field trips, and we encourage the field trips coordinator at each club to maintain close contact with the coordinators at the other clubs in the Alliance and to invite members of other clubs to join in the field trip.
    [Show full text]
  • Trip Schedule NOVEMBER 2013 – FEBRUARY 2014 the Club Is Dependent Upon the Voluntary Trail Policies and Etiquette Cooperation of Those Participating in Its Activities
    Mountain Club of Maryland Trip Schedule NOVEMBER 2013 – FEBRUARY 2014 The Club is dependent upon the voluntary Trail Policies and Etiquette cooperation of those participating in its activities. Observance of the following guidelines will enhance the enjoyment The Mountain Club of Maryland (MCM) is a non-profit organization, of everyone: founded in 1934, whose primary concern is to provide its members and • Register before the deadline. Early registration for overnight or com- guests the opportunity to enjoy nature through hiking and other activi- plicated trips is especially helpful. Leaders may close registration early ties, particularly in the mountainous areas accessible to Baltimore. when necessary to limit the size of the trip. The leader may also refuse We publish a hike and activities schedule, with varieties in location registration to persons who may not be sufficiently strong to stay with and difficulty. We welcome guests to participate in most of our activi- the group. ties. We include some specialized hikes, such as family or nature hikes. • Trips are seldom canceled, even for inclement weather. Check with We help each other, but ultimately everyone is responsible for their the leader when conditions are questionable. If you must cancel, call individual safety and welfare on MCM trips. the leader before he or she leaves for the starting point. Members and We generally charge a guest fee of $2 for non-members. This fee is guests who cancel after trip arrangements have been made are billed waived for members of other Appalachian Trail maintaining clubs. Club for any food or other expenses incurred. members, through their dues, pay the expenses associated with publish- • Arrive early.
    [Show full text]
  • Deer Plan Cover 09-18.Cdr
    Maryland White-tailed Deer Plan 2009-2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) currently garner more attention than any other wildlife species in Maryland. Wildlife-watchers, photographers and hunters contribute millions of dollars each year to the state’s economy while pursuing deer. At the same time, deer are responsible for Maryland’s farmers and other citizens sustaining millions of dollars worth of damage to crops, landscaping and vehicles. Managing the deer population to satisfy recreational interests, while at the same time reducing damage concerns, is a challenging and controversial process. White-tailed deer were plentiful in Maryland at the time of settlement in the 1600s. However, market- hunting and habitat destruction nearly extirpated deer from the state by 1900. The early 1900s through the 1960s was a period of population restoration and deer proliferated due to ideal habitat conditions and the protection of female deer from harvest. By the 1980s, management philosophies across much of the state changed from restoring deer to stabilizing and reducing deer numbers. Active management of deer is a necessity in Maryland today if we are to maintain population levels compatible with the varied interests of the citizens of the state. As an evolutionary prey species, deer exhibit a high fecundity rate, enabling them to rapidly increase in number. Presently, non-lethal management techniques (such as contraceptives) and non-hunting mortality (disease, injuries and predators) are not sufficient to maintain deer populations at satisfactory levels. The lethal control of deer via regulated hunting remains the most effective way to balance the deer population with environmental and cultural concerns on a landscape scale.
    [Show full text]
  • MD DNR Generalized Geology of Maryland 2002
    A Brief Description of the Geology of Maryland Maryland is part of six distinct physiographic provinces: (1) the Atlantic Continental Shelf Province, (2) the Coastal Plain Province, (3) the Piedmont Plateau Province, (4) the Blue Ridge Province, (5) the Ridge and Valley Province, and (6) the Appalachian Plateaus Provinces. These extend in belts of varying width along the eastern edge of the North American continent from Newfoundland to the Gulf of Mexico. The Coastal Plain Province is underlain by a wedge of unconsolidated sediments including gravel, sand, silt, and clay, which overlaps the rocks of the eastern Piedmont along an irregular line of contact known as the Fall Zone. Eastward, this wedge of sediments thickens to more than 8,000 feet at the Atlantic coastline. Beyond this line is the Atlantic Continental Shelf Province, the submerged continuation of the Coastal Plain, which extends eastward for at least another 75 miles where the sediments attain a maximum thickness of about 40,000 feet. The sediments of the Coastal Plain dip eastward at a low angle, generally less than one degree, and range in age from Triassic to Quaternary. The younger formations crop out successively to the southeast across Southern Maryland and the Eastern Shore. A thin layer of Quaternary gravel and sand covers the older formations throughout much of the area. Mineral resources of the Coastal Plain are chiefly sand and gravel, and are used as aggregate materials by the construction industry. Clay for brick and other ceramic uses is also important. Small deposits of iron ore are of historical interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Catoctin Mountain Park Visitor Study 2 Catoctin Mountain Park Visitor Study OMB Approval 1024-0224 (NPS 02-036 ) Expiration Date: 02/28/03
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Visitor Services Project Catoctin Mountain Park Visitor Study 2 Catoctin Mountain Park Visitor Study OMB Approval 1024-0224 (NPS 02-036 ) Expiration Date: 02/28/03 United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Catoctin Mountain Park 6602 Foxville Road Thurmont, Maryland 21788 IN REPLY REFER TO: August 2002 Dear Visitor: Thank you for participating in this important study. Our goal is to learn about the expectations, opinions, and interests of visitors to Catoctin Mountain Park. This will assist us in our efforts to better manage this park and to serve you, the visitor. This questionnaire is only being given to a select number of visitors, so your participation is very important! It should only take a few minutes after your visit to complete the questionnaire. Seal it with the stickers provided on the last page and drop it in any U.S. mailbox. If you have any questions, please contact Margaret Littlejohn, NPS VSP Coordinator, Cooperative Park Studies Unit, College of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 441133, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1133, phone: 208-885-7863, email: [email protected]. We appreciate your help. Sincerely, J. M. Poole Superintendent Catoctin Mountain Park Visitor Study 3 DIRECTIONS One adult in your group should complete the questionnaire. It should only take a few minutes. When you have completed the questionnaire, please seal it with the stickers provided and drop it in any U.S. mailbox. We appreciate your help. PRIVACY ACT and PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT statement : 16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]