OAKS in SWEDEN by Lennarth Jonsson
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Species List
1 of 16 Claypits 20/09/2021 species list Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records acarine Aceria macrorhyncha 2012 2012 1 acarine Aceria nalepai 2018 2018 1 amphibian Bufo bufo Common Toad 2001 2018 6 amphibian Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt 2001 2018 5 amphibian Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth Newt 2001 2001 1 annelid Hirudinea Leech 2011 2011 1 bird Acanthis cabaret Lesser Redpoll 2013 2013 1 bird Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler 2001 2011 2 bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit 2011 2014 2 bird Alcedo atthis Kingfisher 2020 2020 1 bird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 2013 2018 4 bird Anser Goose 2011 2011 1 bird Ardea cinerea Grey Heron 2013 2013 1 bird Aythya fuligula Tufted Duck 2013 2014 1 bird Buteo buteo Buzzard 2013 2014 2 bird Carduelis carduelis Goldfinch 2011 2014 5 bird Chloris chloris Greenfinch 2011 2014 6 bird Chroicocephalus ridibundus Black-headed Gull 2014 2014 1 bird Coloeus monedula Jackdaw 2011 2013 2 bird Columba livia Feral Pigeon 2014 2014 1 bird Columba palumbus Woodpigeon 2011 2018 8 bird Corvus corax Raven 2020 2020 1 bird Corvus corone Carrion Crow 2011 2014 5 bird Curruca communis Whitethroat 2011 2014 4 bird Cyanistes caeruleus Blue Tit 2011 2014 6 bird Cygnus olor Mute Swan 2013 2014 4 bird Delichon urbicum House Martin 2011 2011 1 bird Emberiza schoeniclus Reed Bunting 2013 2014 2 bird Erithacus rubecula Robin 2011 2014 7 bird Falco peregrinus Peregrine 2013 2013 1 bird Falco tinnunculus Kestrel 2010 2020 3 bird Fringilla coelebs Chaffinch 2011 2014 7 bird Gallinula chloropus Moorhen 2013 -
Phytophthora Ramorum Sudden Oak Death Pathogen
NAME OF SPECIES: Phytophthora ramorum Sudden Oak Death pathogen Synonyms: Common Name: Sudden Oak Death pathogen A. CURRENT STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION I. In Wisconsin? 1. YES NO X 2. Abundance: 3. Geographic Range: 4. Habitat Invaded: 5. Historical Status and Rate of Spread in Wisconsin: 6. Proportion of potential range occupied: II. Invasive in Similar Climate YES NO X Zones United States: In 14 coastal California Counties and in Curry County, Oregon. In nursery in Washington. Canada: Nursery in British Columbia. Europe: Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Poland, Spain, France, Belgium, and Sweden. III. Invasive in Similar Habitat YES X NO Types IV. Habitat Affected 1. Habitat affected: this disease thrives in cool, wet climates including areas in coastal California within the fog belt or in low- lying forested areas along stream beds and other bodies of water. Oaks associated with understory species that are susceptible to foliar infections are at higher risk of becoming infected. 2. Host plants: Forty-five hosts are regulated for this disease. These hosts have been found naturally infected by P. ramorum and have had Koch’s postulates completed, reviewed and accepted. Approximately fifty-nine species are associated with Phytophthora ramorum. These species are found naturally infected; P. ramorum has been cultured or detected with PCR but Koch’s postulates have not been completed or documented and reviewed. Northern red oak (Quercus rubra) is considered an associated host. See end of document for complete list of plant hosts. National Risk Model and Map shows susceptible forest types in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. -
Diagnosis of Phytophthora Ramorum in Trees
Diagnosis of PhytophthoraPhytophthora ramorumramorum in Trees by Dr. Kim D. Coder, Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia April, 2004 The organism shown to be responsible for SOD (sudden oak death) is Phytophthora ramorum, a fungus / yeast-like brown algae. This pathogen generates a number of symptoms in the trees infected. Of the trees and large shrubs shown to be infectable with this pathogen, some species have more serious stem and branch lesions like oaks, while other species have primarily leaf and twig lesions. In a single landscape, multiple hosts can keep the pathogen present for further attacks. This publication was prepared by reviewing approximately 35 research or disease announcement publications in Europe and North America. In addition, a number of factsheets and synthesized informa- tion guides were reviewed for continuity. This publication is designed for field diagnosis of SOD-like symptoms and related symptom sets on community trees. This publication should not be used in tree nursery situations, and is not a pathogen centered review. It is critical to seek pathological expertise and testing for confirming disease organism presence. A selected bibliography is available entitled “Sudden Oak Death – SOD: Bibliography of Important Literature.” (Coder, Kim D. 2004. University of Georgia, Warnell School of Forest Resources outreach publication SFR04-1. 2pp.). Names The tree syndrome or symptom set which characterizes attack by Phytophthora ramorum has common names of “ramorum dieback,” “ramorum blight,” “ramorum twig blight,”“ramorum leaf blight,” “ramorum stem canker,” “blood spot disease,” or “sudden oak death” (SOD). Phytophthora ramorum, and the less virulent Phytophthora nemorosa and Phytophthora pseudosyringae are all relatively new pathogen species recovered from trees which show ramorum blight symptoms. -
Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N. -
Proceedings, 18Th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; 2012 March 26-28; Morgantown, WV; Gen
United States Department of Agriculture Proceedings Forest Service 18th Central Hardwood Northern Research Station Forest Conference General Technical Report NRS-P-117 Morgantown, WV March 26-28, 2012 This document is being published in electronic format only (Web and CD). Any corrections or additions will be posted to the Web site (www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs). Cover photo of a morel mushroom by Shawn T. Grushecky, West Virginia University, used with permission. The findings and conclusions of each article in this publication are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service. All articles were received in digital format and were edited for uniform type and style. Each author is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her paper. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. This publication/database reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed CAUTION: here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered PESTICIDES by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. -
Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Genetic Resources Working Papers State of Forest and Tree Genetic Resources in the Republic of Moldova by Dragos Postolache Botanical Garden (Institute) Academy of Sciences Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 2004 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FGR/64E Forest Resources Division FAO, Rome, Italy Disclaimer The Forest Genetic Resources Working Papers report on issues and activities related to the conservation, sustainable use and management of forest genetic resources. The purpose of these papers is to provide early information on on-going activities and programmes, and to stimulate discussion. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Quantitative information regarding the status of forest resources has been compiled according to sources, methodologies and protocols identified and selected by the author, for assessing the diversity and status of genetic resources. For standardized methodologies and assessments on forest resources, please refer to FAO, 2003. State of the World’s Forests 2003 ; and to FAO, 2001. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 (FRA2000). FAO Forestry Paper No 140 . Information can also be found at the FAO-Forestry Internet site (http://www.fao.org/forestry/Forestry.asp ). Comments and feedback are welcome. For further information please contact: Pierre Sigaud, Forestry Officer (Forest Genetic Resources) Forest Resources Division Forestry Department FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy Fax: +39 06 570 55 137 [email protected] For quotation: Postolache, D. -
Vegetation Classification of Acidophilous Oak Forestsin Slovakia
Tuexenia 40: 33–52. Göttingen 2020. doi: 10.14471/2020.40.010, available online at www.zobodat.at Vegetation classification of acidophilous oak forests in Slovakia Vegetationsklassifikation bodensaurer Eichenwälder in der Slowakei Michal Slezák1, 2, * , Milan Valachovič3, , Drahoš Blanár4, František Máliš5, 6 , Dušan Senko3 & Hubert Žarnovičan7 1Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Ľ. Štúra 2, 950 53 Zvolen, Slovakia; 2Podtatranské museum in Poprad, Vajanského 72/4, 058 01 Poprad, Slovakia; 3Institute of Botany, Plant Science and Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 23 Bratislava, Slovakia; 4Administration of the Muránska planina National Park, J, Kráľa 12, 050 01 Revúca, Slovakia; 5Department of Phytology, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia; 6National Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 22, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia; 7Department of Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Acidophilous oak forests are species-poor forest plant communities usually growing on mineral- poor geological and soil substrates. We compiled a large data set of 263 phytosociological relevés assigned to the Quercion roboris alliance in Slovakia to produce the first syntaxonomical revision at national level. Modified Twinspan algorithm was applied for numerical classification and -
Field Guide – Common Trees and Shrubs of Georgia
Introduction Up to 400 species of trees and shrubs grow in Georgian for- ests. This Field Guide contains information about 100 species of trees and shrubs from 38 plant families. The abundance of relict and endemic timber species (61 species endemic to Geor- gia and 43 species endemic to the Caucasus) indicates the high biodiversity of Georgian forests. Georgian forests provide habitats and migration corridors to a range of wild fauna, and play an important role in the conserva- tion of the genetic diversity of animal species in the region. In conditions of complex and deeply dissected relief, characteristic to Georgia, forests are especially important due to their climate regulation, water regulation and soil protection functions. Forests also ensure the continuous delivery of vital benefits and resources to the population, and facilitate the development of a range of industries. Introduction In this Field Guide each plant family is displayed in a different color. The Field Guide contains an alphabetical index of species, as well as the names of species in Latin and English, as estab- lished by the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. The Field Guide also contains a brief description of the taxo- nomic characteristics, range and protection status of each spe- cies. Alphabetical Index Name in English Name in Latin # Alpine Currant Ribes alpinum 59 Bay Laurel Laurus nobilis 62 Begonia-Leafed Lime Tilia Begoniifolia 92 Bitchvinta Pine Pinus pithyusa 6 Black Alder Alnus barbata 28 Black Elder Sambucus nigra 31 Black Poplar Populus -
Quercus Robur and Quercus Petraea
Quercus robur and Quercus petraea Quercus robur and Quercus petraea in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats E. Eaton, G. Caudullo, S. Oliveira, D. de Rigo these oaks can mix, compete and naturally hybridise with other Mediterranean oaks, such as Quercus pubescens and Quercus Quercus robur L., (pedunculate oak) and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl., (sessile oak) are common broadleaved tree frainetto, even if at relatively low rates12. Both oaks occur at species in Europe, found from Scandinavia to the Iberian Peninsula. The two species are quite similar in appearance and higher elevations in southern regions: Q. robur is recorded to grow have a broadly overlapping range. Oak trees have cultural significance for people throughout Europe and the trees or up to 1 300 m in the Alps13, while Q. petraea is more montane leaves are frequently used in national or regional symbols. Oak trees can live for more than 1 000 years and grow to and in southern Turkey can reach over 2 000 m4, 14, 15. Due to the be 30 to 40 m in height. The wood from oaks is hard and durable and has been valued for centuries. It is favoured for substantial human interest and usage of the species over many construction and for wine and spirit barrels; historically it was a major source of ship timbers. Recently, concerns have centuries, there is widespread disturbance in their distribution, and arisen about the fate of oaks in the face of Acute Oak Decline, a little understood syndrome. the structure of their original forests is highly uncertain16. Q. -
Newcastle West Biodiversity Survey 2020
Newcastle West Biodiversity Survey 2020 By Geoff Hunt This survey was carried out on behalf of Newcastle West Tidy Towns 1 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Survey Area .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Castle Demesne ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.3 Habitat abbreviations................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 General abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 11 2 Species Results .................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Birds ........................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Butterflies ................................................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Moths ......................................................................................................................................... 16 2.4 Dragonflies and Damselflies ...................................................................................................... -
Biodiversity Assessment for Georgia
Biodiversity Assessment for Georgia Task Order under the Biodiversity & Sustainable Forestry IQC (BIOFOR) USAID C ONTRACT NUMBER: LAG-I-00-99-00014-00 SUBMITTED TO: USAID WASHINGTON E&E BUREAU, ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION SUBMITTED BY: CHEMONICS INTERNATIONAL INC. WASHINGTON, D.C. FEBRUARY 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I INTRODUCTION I-1 SECTION II STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY II-1 A. Overview II-1 B. Main Landscape Zones II-2 C. Species Diversity II-4 SECTION III STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION III-1 A. Protected Areas III-1 B. Conservation Outside Protected Areas III-2 SECTION IV STRATEGIC AND POLICY FRAMEWORK IV-1 A. Policy Framework IV-1 B. Legislative Framework IV-1 C. Institutional Framework IV-4 D. Internationally Supported Projects IV-7 SECTION V SUMMARY OF FINDINGS V-1 SECTION VI RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVED BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION VI-1 SECTION VII USAID/GEORGIA VII-1 A. Impact of the Program VII-1 B. Recommendations for USAID/Georgia VII-2 ANNEX A SECTIONS 117 AND 119 OF THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT A-1 ANNEX B SCOPE OF WORK B-1 ANNEX C LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED C-1 ANNEX D LISTS OF RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF GEORGIA D-1 ANNEX E MAP OF LANDSCAPE ZONES (BIOMES) OF GEORGIA E-1 ANNEX F MAP OF PROTECTED AREAS OF GEORGIA F-1 ANNEX G PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA G-1 ANNEX H GEORGIA PROTECTED AREAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESIGN SUMMARY H-1 ANNEX I AGROBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN GEORGIA (FROM GEF PDF GRANT PROPOSAL) I-1 SECTION I Introduction This biodiversity assessment for the Republic of Georgia has three interlinked objectives: · Summarizes the status of biodiversity and its conservation in Georgia; analyzes threats, identifies opportunities, and makes recommendations for the improved conservation of biodiversity. -
Foliar Epidermis Morphology in Quercus (Subgenus Quercus, Section Quercus)Iniran
Color profile: Disabled Composite 150 lpi at 45 degrees Acta Bot. Croat. 71 (1), 95–113, 2012 CODEN: ABCRA25 ISSN 0365–0588 eISSN 1847-8476 Foliar epidermis morphology in Quercus (subgenus Quercus, section Quercus)inIran PARISA PANAHI1, 2,ZIBA JAMZAD2*,MOHAMMAD R. POURMAJIDIAN1, ASGHAR FALLAH1,MEHDI POURHASHEMI3 1 Department of Forestry, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, P.O.Box: 737, Sari, Iran 2 Botany Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands of Iran, P.O.Box: 013185-116, Tehran, Iran 3 Forest Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands of Iran, P.O.Box: 13185-116, Tehran, Iran Abstract – The foliar morphology of trichomes, epicuticular waxes and stomata in Quercus cedrorum, Q. infectoria subsp. boissieri, Q. komarovii, Q. longipes, Q. macran- thera, Q. petraea subsp. iberica and Q. robur subsp. pedunculiflora were studied by scan- ning electron microscopy. The trichomes are mainly present on abaxial leaf surface in most species, but rarely they appear on adaxial surface. Five trichome types are identified as simple uniseriate, bulbous, solitary, fasciculate and stellate. The stomata of all studied species are of the anomocytic type, raised on the epidermis. The stomata rim may or may not be covered with epicuticular. The epicuticular waxes are mostly of the crystalloid type but smooth layer wax is observed in Q. robur subsp. pedunculiflora. Statistical analysis revealed foliar micromorphological features as been diagnostic characters in Quercus. Keywords: Quercus, trichome, stoma, epicuticular wax, SEM Introduction Quercus is the most frequent genus of Fagaceae in the forests of Iran. Different species of oak are distributed in vast areas of the Zagros, Arasbaran and Hyrcanian Forests.