Evolutionary Lineage of Naked Harmful Dinoflagellates, Karlodiniumikareniaitaka Yamai Gyrodinium Complex (Dinophyceae)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EVOLUTIONARY LINEAGE OF NAKED HARMFUL DINOFLAGELLATES, KARLODINIUMIKARENIAITAKA YAMAI GYRODINIUM COMPLEX (DINOPHYCEAE) Chow Luan Jia Bachelor of Science with Honours (Resource Biotechnology) 2011 ~ ..sa. u......., i.dl.........'AUl1fllu lNWM1I M&LArM SAMWAt.. EVOLUTIONARY LINEAGE OF NAKED HARMF L DU OFLAGELLATES KARLODINIUMI KAREN/AI TAKA yAft:L!V GYRODINIUM COMPLEX mINOPIlYCEAE) Chow Luan .Jia (20813) This project is submitted in partial fullfilment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours (Resource Biotechnology) upervisor: Dr Leaw Chui Pin Co-supervisor: Dr Lim Po Teen Resource Bioctchnolog} Prngrfl lnme Depanmenl of Molecular Biolog} Faeulty of Resource Science and Tt:c: hnology lIni\cr!'oIlY Malaysia Sanl\\ak 2011 "·t • • • DECLARATION I hereby declare that no portion of the \ ork referred to this thesis has been submitted in support of an appl ication for another degree of qualification to this or any other univ rsity nr institution of higher Ieaming. (~~ CHOW LUA, JIA Resource Biotechnology Programme, Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, University Malaysia Sarawak. , ... ...ill -. A KNOWLEDGEMENTS First fall, [ would like to lhank Universiti Malaysia Sarawak for giving me this opportunity to complete my fmal year rojecl. The greatest honors go to my supervisor Dr Leaw Chui Pin and CO-5upervisor Dr Lim Po Teen for their leadership and guidance in completing the study. Sin erely thank.> to the Sarawak Fisheries Department for the acccssibility to the sampling site. Great appreciation to the following individuals for their as istances In varIous forms: Hii Kien Soon, Tan Toh Hii, Lim Hong Chang, Teng Sing Tung and all the lab members and the lab assistants of the ECOlOxicology Laboratoy and !BEC Molecular Laboratory. My gratitudes also go to the FRST science officers especiall y En. SafTi, En. Besar_ En. Nazri, and Mdm. Ting Woei for their helps and hospitality. Last but not least, I would like to thank my family for thei r financial, moral and emotional supports. My siblings receive my deepest gratitude for their dedication and support during my undergraduate studies that provided the foundati on for this study. This project was supported by MOSTI eScience Fund to Dr Leaw. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEME TS TABLE OF CO:'olTENT. ii LI T OF ABBREVIATIONS iv LI T OF FIGURE \ LIST OF TABLES Vll ABSTRACT viii ABSTRAK viii 1.0 L"ITROD CTION 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW 3 2.1 Naked dinoflagellates 3 22 Harmful alga blooms 7 2.3 History of neurotoxic shellfish poisoning (NS?) 8 2.4 Ribosomal RNA genes (rONA) region 10 3.0 MATERIA LS AND METHODS I I 3.1 Sample ollection and clonal culru rc c'lablishment II 3.2 Species identification 12 3.3 Genomic 0 A extraction J3 3.4 Amplification and sequencing of rONA 13 3.5 Phylogenetic analyses 14 3.5. 1 Sequence analysis and taxon ,. ampling 14 3.5.2 LSU phylogenetic analysis 15 3.5.3 Matrix construction for morphological ·:·:laraclers J5 11 . --------- ~. 4.0 RESULTS 16 4.1 Algal cul tures establ i hed 16 4.2 Species identification 16 4.1.1 Protocerarium rericuiatum 17 4.2 .2 Prorocentrum rhathymum 19 4.2.3 GyrodmiulII illslriarum 21 ')' 4.2.4 Alexandrilllll sp. - ~ 4. 2.5 Akashill 0 sal1guinea 24 4.2.6 ochlodinium cf. p ofykrikoides 25 4.2. 7 Prorocentrum sigmoides 26 4.2.8 Karlodinium veneficwn 27 4.3 Genomic DNA extraction, amplification and purification 29 4.4 Taxon sampling 30 4.5 Phylogenetic inferences of naked dinoflagell ates 31 4.5.1 Karlodinium phylogeny 31 4.5.2 Karenia phylogeny 32 4.5 .3 Takayama phylogeny 33 4.5.4 Gyrodinium phylogeny 34 4.6 Morphological traits 35 4.7 Matrices constructed for character state evolution 47 4.8 Character state evolution 50 4.8.1 Character state evoluti on of Karlodiniwn 50 4.8.2 Character state evolution of Karenia 53 4. 8.3 Character state evolution of Taka.vama 56 4.8.4 Character state evolution of Gyrodinillm 58 5.0 DISCUSSION 60 6.0 CO CLU ION 69 7.0 REFERENCES 70 III .; --------- ~, LIST OF ABBREVI TJONS N P Neurotoxic Shellfi sh Poisoning BLAST Basic local aJigIunent search tool EM Scanning Electron Microscope LM Light Microscope HAB Harmful algal bloom rRNA Ribosomal genes CPO Cri tical Point Dried IV ... ---- ~, Ll T OF FIGURE P ge Figure 2.1 Phylogeny of major g nera of dinoflag Ha tes. trict consensus 6 of the 10 equally parsimonious trees obtained with the heuristic 'eareh option in P UT' (Oaug~i erg . ~OOO). FIgur· ~ _., ')_ The dinoflagellate A.arenia brevis, the causative organism of red 10 tides on tb West Florida sbelf (Da\,id Partersoo, 1arille Biological Laboratory cited in Lorraine, 2006). Figure 3.1 Map :ho\\ing 'antubong and Semariang sampling site. 13 Figure -t .1 Light and scanning electron micrographs of Pr%eem/illn! 18 reticularum fro m Semariang, Sarawak. Figure 4.2 Light and scaMing electron micrographs of Prorocenrrum 20 rha/hymum from Semariang, Sarawak. Figure 4.3 Light micrographs of Gymnodinium inslriarum from Santubong, 21 Sarawak. Figure 4.4 ScaMing electron micrographs of Gymnodinium ins/ria/urn from 22 Saotubong, Sarawak. Figure 4.5 Light and scanning electron micrographs of Alexandrium sp. 23 from Semariaog, Sarawak. Figure 4.6 Light and autofluorescence micrographs of Akashiwo sangllinea 24 from Semariang, Samwak. Figure 4.7 Light aod autofluorescence micrographs of Cochlodiniwn cf. 25 polykrikoides from Semariang, Sarawak. Figure 4.8 Light and autofluorescence micrographs of Prorocentrum 26 sigmoides fro m Selllarian g, Sarawak. Figure 4.9 Scanning electron micrographs of Karlodinium venejiculIl from 28 Johore. Figure 4.10 Negative image of gel for purified PCR products of LS rONA 29 gene amplified from dinoflagellate cultures. L, 1000bp ladder (Promega, U A); lane I, GiSB30; lane 2, Al SM86; lane 3, AISM94; lane 4, CoLD I 0 and -ve, negative control. Figure 4. 12 MP tree of Kariodinilllll with tree length 01' 61 2 evolutionary 31 steps and bootstrap \'alue of 1000. The consistenc) index (el) was 0.8284 and retention index IRJ ) - 0.6602. v .; ------ ~; Figure 4.12 MP tree of Karenia with tree length of 480 evolutionary steps 32 and bootstrap value of 1000. The consistency index (CI) was 0.8583 and retention index (Rl) =0.5613. Figure 4.13 MP tree of Takayama with tree length of 392 e olutionary steps 33 and bootstrap yulue of \000. The consistency index (CI) was 0.9337 and retention index (RI) =0.7204. Figure 4.14 !'vIP tree of Gyrodinillm with tree length of 745 evolutionary 34 steps and bootstrap value of 1000. n1e consistency index (Cl ) was 0.8389 and retention index tID) =0.53-19. Figure ·U 5 Character states mapping onto the MP tree of genus 52 Karlodinillln with 15 character states and I I taxa including 3 outgroups. Fi gure 4.16 Character states mapping onto the MP tree of genus Karenia 55 with 17 character states and 9 taxa including 3 outgroups. Figure 4.17 Character states mapping onto the MP tree of genus Takayama 57 with 15 character states and 8 taxa including 3 outgroups. Figure 4.18 Character states mapping onto the MP tree of genus 60 Karlodinium ilh 15 character states and 9 taxa including 3 outgroups. Vj • --------- .1\. LI T OF TABLES Page Table 3.1 Reaction parameters for L U region amplification. 1-\ Table 4.1 Dinoflagellates isolated and established into clonal cultures 16 with their strains. isolat d date and location, Table 4.:! Species from the four gener used in study . The LSU rR.."'A 30 gene sequences were obtained from GenBank with their origin. Strain designation and respective accession numbers. Table -\. 3 Morphological characters and character states coded 111 this 36 study for the genus Karlodinium, Table 4.4 Morphological characters and character states coded IJ1 thi s 39 study for genus Karenia, Table 4,5 Morphological characters and character states coded III the 42 study for genus Takayama, Table 4.6 Morphological characters and character states coded IJ1 thi s 44 study for the genus Gyrodinium. Table 4.7 Di stribution of the character states among Karlodinium spp, 48 for the IS characters used in the character state evolution analysis, Table 4,8 Distribution of the character states among Karenia spp, for the 4R 17 characters used in tlle character state evolution analysis. Table 4,9 Distribution of the character states among Takayama spp, for 49 the IS characters used in the character state evolution analy is, Table 4, I 0 Distribution of the character states among Gyrodinium spp. for 49 the 15 characters lIsed in the haraet r stale ~\'olutio n analysis, V II - _ . --- - '''',n. EVOLUTIONARY LINEAGE OF NAKED H RMFUL DINOFLAGELLATES, KARLODINlUMI KARENW TAKAYAMA! GYRODINlUM COMPLEX (D INOPHYCEAE) Chow LuaD Jill AB TRACT The genera of 1\ r/vdillnilll. Karel/ia, TnkayalllG. GyrodilTlim are naked (.thecated) dinotlagell ates that have the potenti al to cause harmful algal blooms through Ihe production oftoxins or b} their accumulated biomass, which can affect co-occuning organisms and alter food·\Ieb dynami". In uus 'tudy. we examu" the phylogenetic lineage of I\arlodiu";",, I\a"<ma, Takayama, GJr()dinllllll complex by mapping the morphological characters ontO Ihe pbylogenetic (fee. Using LSU rRNA gene sequences inferences, AUTlodinium and Takayama phylogenies each revealed two monophyletic groups respective ly whereas K{}fenia revealed wec monophyletic groups and Gyrodiniul/I revealed only one monophyletic group. Character mapping onto the LSU phyJogeny reveaJed th at different genera possess differen t morphological cbaracters as the major morphological traits fo r species delineation. It appears that onl y certain classic morphological fea tures (length and sbaped of apical groove, cingUlum displacement, sulcus structure, present of ventraJ pore) are of phylogenetic signi/icance.