DOCSLIB.ORG

LTER VIII Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LTER VIII Proposal COVER SHEET FOR PROPOSAL TO THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT/SOLICITATION NO./DUE DATE Special Exception to Deadline Date Policy FOR NSF USE ONLY NSF 19-593 03/05/20 NSF PROPOSAL NUMBER FOR CONSIDERATION BY NSF ORGANIZATION UNIT(S) (Indicate the most specific unit known, i.e. program, division, etc.) DEB - Long-Term Ecological Research DATE RECEIVED NUMBER OF COPIES DIVISION ASSIGNED FUND CODE DUNS# (Data Universal Numbering System) FILE LOCATION EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) OR SHOW PREVIOUS AWARD NO. IF THIS IS TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN) A RENEWAL AN ACCOMPLISHMENT-BASED RENEWAL 480771751 1440484 NAME OF ORGANIZATION TO WHICH AWARD SHOULD BE MADE ADDRESS OF AWARDEE ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE Kansas State University Kansas State University 2 Fairchild Hall AWARDEE ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN) Manhattan,KS.665061100 0019281000 NAME OF PRIMARY PLACE OF PERF ADDRESS OF PRIMARY PLACE OF PERF, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE Kansas State University Kansas State University Manhattan ,KS ,665061100 ,US. IS AWARDEE ORGANIZATION (Check All That Apply) SMALL BUSINESS MINORITY BUSINESS IF THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATION WOMAN-OWNED BUSINESS THEN CHECK HERE TITLE OF PROPOSED PROJECT LTER: Manipulating drivers to assess grassland resilience REQUESTED AMOUNT PROPOSED DURATION (1-60 MONTHS) REQUESTED STARTING DATE SHOW RELATED PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL NO. IF APPLICABLE $ 7,122,000 72 months 11/01/20 THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDES ANY OF THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW BEGINNING INVESTIGATOR HUMAN SUBJECTS Human Subjects Assurance Number DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Exemption Subsection or IRB App. Date PROPRIETARY & PRIVILEGED INFORMATION FUNDING OF INT'L BRANCH CAMPUS OF U.S IHE FUNDING OF FOREIGN ORG HISTORIC PLACES INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES: COUNTRY/COUNTRIES INVOLVED VERTEBRATE ANIMALS IACUC App. Date Planned PHS Animal Welfare Assurance Number A3609-01 COLLABORATIVE STATUS TYPE OF PROPOSAL Research A collaborative proposal from one organization (PAPPG II.D.3.a) PI/PD DEPARTMENT PI/PD POSTAL ADDRESS Division of Biology 116 Ackert Hall MANHATTAN,KS 665061103 PI/PD FAX NUMBER United States 785-532-6653 NAMES (TYPED) High Degree Yr of Degree Telephone Number Email Address PI/PD NAME Jesse B Nippert PhD 2006 785-532-0114 nippert@ksu.edu CO-PI/PD Sara G Baer 2001 618-453-3228 sgbaer@ku.edu CO-PI/PD Keith B Gido PhD 1999 785-532-5088 kgido@ksu.edu CO-PI/PD Melinda Smith 2002 970-491-7155 melinda.smith@colostate.edu CO-PI/PD Lydia H Zeglin PhD 2008 785-532-5579 lzeglin@ksu.edu Page 1 of 3 929773554 03/05/2020 9:54am IS THIS PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED TO ANOTHER FEDERAL AGENCY? YES NO IF YES, LIST ACRONYM(S) Direct for Biological Sciences Division of Environmental Biology Long-term Ecological Research Proposal Classification Form PI: Nippert, Jesse / Proposal Number: 2025849 CATEGORY I: INVESTIGATOR STATUS (Select ONE) Beginning Investigator - No previous Federal support as PI or Co-PI, excluding fellowships, dissertations, planning grants, etc. Prior Federal support only Current Federal support only Current & prior Federal support CATEGORY II: FIELDS OF SCIENCE OTHER THAN BIOLOGY INVOLVED IN THIS RESEARCH (Select 1 to 3) Astronomy Engineering Psychology Chemistry Mathematics Social Sciences Computer Science Physics None of the Above Geosciences CATEGORY III: SUBSTANTIVE AREA (Select 1 to 4) BIOGEOGRAPHY Decomposition Molecular Evolution Island Biogeography Biogeochemistry Methodology/Theory Historical/ Evolutionary Biogeography Limnology/Hydrology Isozymes/ Electrophoresis Phylogeography Climate/Microclimate Nucleic Acid Analysis (general) Methods/Theory Whole-System Analysis Restriction Enzymes CHROMOSOME STUDIES Productivity/Biomass Nucleotide Sequencing Nuclear DNA Chromosome Evolution System Energetics Mitochondrial DNA Chromosome Number Landscape Dynamics Chloroplast DNA Mutation Chemical & Biochemical Control RNA Analysis Mitosis and Meiosis Global Change DNA Hybridization COMMUNITY ECOLOGY Climate Change Recombinant DNA Community Analysis Regional Studies Amino Acid Sequencing Community Structure Global Studies Gene/Genome Mapping Community Stability Forestry Natural Products Succession Resource Management (Wildlife, Serology/Immunology Experimental Microcosms/ Mesocosms Fisheries, Range, Other) PALEONTOLOGY Disturbance Agricultural Ecology Floristic Patch Dynamics EXTREMOPHILES Faunistic GENOMICS (Genome sequence, Paleoecology Food Webs/ Trophic Structure organization, function) Keystone Species Viral Biostratigraphy COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Microbial Palynology CONSERVATION & RESTORATION Fungal Micropaleontology BIOLOGY Plant Paleoclimatology DATABASES Animal Archeozoic ECOSYSTEMS LEVEL MARINE MAMMALS Paleozoic Physical Structure MOLECULAR APPROACHES Mesozoic Page 1 Cenozoic Quantitative Genetics/ QTL Analysis Coevolution POPULATION DYNAMICS & LIFE Ecological Genetics Biological Control HISTORY Gender Ratios STATISTICS & MODELING Demography/ Life History Apomixis/ Parthenogenesis Methods/ Instrumentation/ Software Population Cycles Vegetative Reproduction Modeling (general) Distribution/Patchiness/ Marginal Populations SPECIES INTERACTIONS Statistics (general) Multivariate Methods Population Regulation Predation Herbivory Spatial Statistics & Spatial Modeling Intraspecific Competition Sampling Design & Analysis Omnivory Reproductive Strategies Experimental Design & Analysis Interspecific Competition Gender Allocation SYSTEMATICS Niche Relationships/ Resource Metapopulations Partititioning Taxonomy/Classification Extinction Pollination/ Seed Dispersal Nomenclature POPULATION GENETICS & Monograph/Revision BREEDING SYSTEMS Parasitism Phylogenetics Variation Mutualism/ Commensalism Plant/Fungal/ Microbial Interactions Phenetics/Cladistics/ Numerical Microevolution Taxonomy Mimicry Speciation Macroevolution Animal Pathology Hybridization NONE OF THE ABOVE Inbreeding/Outbreeding Plant Pathology Gene Flow Measurement Inheritance/Heritability CATEGORY IV: INFRASTRUCTURE (Select 1 to 3) COLLECTIONS/STOCK CULTURES Field Stations Technique Development Natural History Collections Field Facility Structure TRACKING SYSTEMS DATABASES Field Facility Equipment Geographic Information Systems FACILITIES LTER Site Remote Sensing Controlled Environment Facilities INDUSTRY PARTICIPATION NONE OF THE ABOVE CATEGORY V: HABITAT (Select 1 to 2) TERRESTRIAL HABITATS GENERAL TERRESTRIAL Savanna CHAPPARAL/ SCLEROPHYLL/ TUNDRA Thornwoods SHRUBLANDS Deciduous Forest BOREAL FOREST ALPINE Coniferous Forest TEMPERATE MONTANE Desert Deciduous Forest CLOUD FOREST TROPICAL Coniferous Forest RIPARIAN ZONES Rain Forest Rain Forest ISLANDS (except Barrier Islands) Seasonal Forest Mixed Forest Savanna BEACHES/ DUNES/ SHORES/ Prairie/Grasslands BARRIER ISLANDS Thornwoods Desert CAVES/ ROCK OUTCROPS/ CLIFFS Deciduous Forest SUBTROPICAL Coniferous Forest CROPLANDS/ FALLOW FIELDS/ Rain Forest PASTURES Desert Seasonal Forest URBAN/SUBURBAN SUBTERRANEAN/ SOIL/ SEDIMENTS EXTREME TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT AERIAL Page 2 AQUATIC HABITATS GENERAL AQUATIC Open Ocean/Continental Shelf EXTREME AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT FRESHWATER Bathyal CAVES/ ROCK OUTCROPS/ CLIFFS Abyssal Wetlands/Bogs/Swamps MANGROVES Estuarine Lakes/Ponds SUBSURFACE WATERS/ SPRINGS Rivers/Streams Intertidal/Tidal/Coastal EPHEMERAL POOLS & STREAMS Reservoirs Coral Reef HYPERSALINE MICROPOOLS (Pitcher Plants, Tree MARINE Holes, Other) MAN-MADE ENVIRONMENTS LABORATORY THEORETICAL SYSTEMS OTHER ARTIFICIAL SYSTEMS NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE CATEGORY VI: GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF THE RESEARCH (Select 1 to 2) WORLDWIDE Eastern South America (Guyana, Fr. Guiana, North Africa Suriname, Brazil) African South of the Sahara NORTH AMERICA Northern South America (Colombia, United States Venezuela) East Africa Northeast US (CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, Southern South America (Chile, Argentina, Madagascar PA, RI, VT) Uruguay, Paraguay) South Africa Northcentral US (IA, IL, IN, MI, MN, ND, Western South America (Ecuador, Peru, West Africa NE, OH, SD, WI) Bolivia) AUSTRALASIA Northwest US (ID, MT, OR, WA, WY) EUROPE Australia Southeast US (DC, DE, FL, GA, MD, NC, Eastern Europe SC, WV, VA) New Zealand Russia Southcentral US (AL, AR, KS, KY, LA, MO, Pacific Islands MS, OK, TN, TX) Scandinavia ANTARCTICA Southwest US (AZ, CA, CO, NM, NV, UT) Western Europe Alaska ASIA ARCTIC Hawaii Central Asia ATLANTIC OCEAN Puerto Rico Far East PACIFIC OCEAN Canada Middle East INDIAN OCEAN Mexico Siberia OTHER REGIONS (Not defined) South Asia CENTRAL AMERICA (Mainland) NOT APPLICABLE Caribbean Islands Southeast Asia Bermuda/Bahamas AFRICA SOUTH AMERICA CATEGORY VII: CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANISMS (Select 1 to 4) VIRUSES Microspora Chrysophyta Bacterial Radiolaria Dinoflagellata Plant FUNGI Euglenoids Animal Ascomycota Phaeophyta PROKARYOTES Basidiomycota Rhodophyta Archaea Chytridiomycota PLANTS Cyanobacteria Mitosporic Fungi NON-VASCULAR PLANTS Bacteria Oomycota BRYOPHYTA Noncultured Organisms Zygomycota Anthocerotae (Hornworts) PROTISTA (PROTOZOA) LICHENS Hepaticae (Liverworts) Amoebae SLIME MOLDS Musci (Mosses) VASCULAR PLANTS Apicomplexa ALGAE FERNS & FERN ALLIES Ciliophora Bacillariophyta (Diatoms) GYMNOSPERMS Flagellates Charophyta Coniferales (Conifers) Foraminifera Chlorophyta Page 3 Cycadales (Cycads) Polyplacophora (Chitons) Coleoptera (Beetles) Ginkgoales (Ginkgo) Scaphopoda (Tooth Shells) Hymenoptera (Ants, Bees, Wasps, Sawflies) Gnetales (Gnetophytes) Gastropoda (Snails, Slugs, Limpets) Chilopoda (Centipedes) ANGIOSPERMS Pelecypoda (Bivalvia) (Clams, Mussels, Oysters, Scallops) Diplopoda (Millipedes) Monocots
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mollusksmollusks the Paleontological Society Http:\\Paleosoc.Org
    MollusksMollusks The Paleontological Society http:\\paleosoc.org Mollusks The concept Mollusca brings together a great deal of cept Mollusca is unified by anatomical similarities, by information about animals that at first glance appear to be embryological similarities, and by evidence from fossils radically different from one another—snails, slugs, of the evolutionary history of the species placed within mussels, clams, oysters, octopuses, squids, and others. the phylum; all this information indicates a common The diversity of the phylum is shown by at least eight ancestry for the groups placed in the phylum. known classes (cover). Estimates of the number of species alive today range from 50,000 to 130,000. Most Most mollusks are free-living multicellular animals that of the shells found on the beaches of the modem world have a multilayered calcareous shell or conch on their belong to mollusks and mollusks are probably the most backs. This exoskeleton provides support for the soft abundant invertebrate animals in modern oceans. organs including a muscular foot and the organs of digestion, respiration, excretion, reproduction, and others. Living mollusks range in size from microscopic snails Around all of the soft parts is a space called the mantle and clams to almost 60 foot long (18 meters) squids. cavity, which is open to the outside. The mantle cavity is They live in most marine and freshwater environments, a passageway for incoming feeding and respiratory and some snails and slugs live on land. In the sea, mol- currents, and an exit for the discharge of wastes. The lusks range from the intertidal zone to the deepest ocean outer wall of the mantle cavity is a thin flap of tissue basins and they may be bottom-dwelling, swimming, or called the mantle, which secretes the shell.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Meeting 2011
    The Palaeontological Association 55th Annual Meeting 17th–20th December 2011 Plymouth University PROGRAMME and ABSTRACTS Palaeontological Association 2 ANNUAL MEETING ANNUAL MEETING Palaeontological Association 1 The Palaeontological Association 55th Annual Meeting 17th–20th December 2011 School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Plymouth University The programme and abstracts for the 55th Annual Meeting of the Palaeontological Association are outlined after the following summary of the meeting. Venue The meeting will take place on the campus of Plymouth University. Directions to the University and a campus map can be found at <http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/location>. The opening symposium and the main oral sessions will be held in the Sherwell Centre, located on North Hill, on the east side of campus. Accommodation Delegates need to make their own arrangements for accommodation. Plymouth has a large number of hotels, guesthouses and hostels at a variety of prices, most of which are within ~1km of the University campus (hotels with PL1 or PL4 postcodes are closest). More information on these can be found through the usual channels, and a useful starting point is the website <http://www.visitplymouth.co.uk/site/where-to-stay>. In addition, we have organised discount rates at the Jury’s Inn, Exeter Street, which is located ~500m from the conference venue. A maximum of 100 rooms have been reserved, and will be allocated on a first-come-first-served basis. Further information can be found on the Association’s website. Travel Transport into Plymouth can be achieved via a variety of means. Travel by train from London Paddington to Plymouth takes between three and four hours depending on the time of day and the number of stops.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early History of the Metazoa—A Paleontologist's Viewpoint
    ISSN 20790864, Biology Bulletin Reviews, 2015, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 415–461. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2015. Original Russian Text © A.Yu. Zhuravlev, 2014, published in Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii, 2014, Vol. 75, No. 6, pp. 411–465. The Early History of the Metazoa—a Paleontologist’s Viewpoint A. Yu. Zhuravlev Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, per. Pyzhevsky 7, Moscow, 7119017 Russia email: ayzhur@mail.ru Received January 21, 2014 Abstract—Successful molecular biology, which led to the revision of fundamental views on the relationships and evolutionary pathways of major groups (“phyla”) of multicellular animals, has been much more appre ciated by paleontologists than by zoologists. This is not surprising, because it is the fossil record that provides evidence for the hypotheses of molecular biology. The fossil record suggests that the different “phyla” now united in the Ecdysozoa, which comprises arthropods, onychophorans, tardigrades, priapulids, and nemato morphs, include a number of transitional forms that became extinct in the early Palaeozoic. The morphology of these organisms agrees entirely with that of the hypothetical ancestral forms reconstructed based on onto genetic studies. No intermediates, even tentative ones, between arthropods and annelids are found in the fos sil record. The study of the earliest Deuterostomia, the only branch of the Bilateria agreed on by all biological disciplines, gives insight into their early evolutionary history, suggesting the existence of motile bilaterally symmetrical forms at the dawn of chordates, hemichordates, and echinoderms. Interpretation of the early history of the Lophotrochozoa is even more difficult because, in contrast to other bilaterians, their oldest fos sils are preserved only as mineralized skeletons.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Perspectives on Molluscan Shells, Part 1: Introduction and Molecular Biology
    CHAPTER 1 DEVELOPING PERSPECTIVES ON MOLLUSCAN SHELLS, PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY KEVIN M. KOCOT1, CARMEL MCDOUGALL, and BERNARD M. DEGNAN 1Present Address: Department of Biological Sciences and Alabama Museum of Natural History, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA; E-mail: kmkocot@ua.edu School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia CONTENTS Abstract ........................................................................................................2 1.1 Introduction .........................................................................................2 1.2 Insights From Genomics, Transcriptomics, and Proteomics ............13 1.3 Novelty in Molluscan Biomineralization ..........................................21 1.4 Conclusions and Open Questions .....................................................24 Keywords ...................................................................................................27 References ..................................................................................................27 2 Physiology of Molluscs Volume 1: A Collection of Selected Reviews ABSTRACT Molluscs (snails, slugs, clams, squid, chitons, etc.) are renowned for their highly complex and robust shells. Shell formation involves the controlled deposition of calcium carbonate within a framework of macromolecules that are secreted by the outer epithelium of a specialized organ called the mantle. Molluscan shells display remarkable morphological
    [Show full text]
  • Aplacophoran Mollusca in the Natural History Museum Berlin. an Annotated Catalogue of Thiele's Type Specimens, with a Brief
    Mitt. Mus. Nat.kd. Berl., Zool. Reihe 81 (2005) 2, 145–166 / DOI 10.1002/mmnz.200510009 Aplacophoran Mollusca in the Natural History Museum Berlin. An annotated catalogue of Thiele’s type specimens, with a brief review of “Aplacophora” classification Matthias Glaubrecht*,1, Lothar Maitas1 & Luitfried v. Salvini-Plawen**,2 1 Department of Malacozoology, Museum of Natural History, Humboldt University, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany 2 Institut fu¨ r Zoologie, Universita¨t Wien, Althanstraße 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria Received January 2005, accepted April 2005 Published online 08. 09. 2005 With 2 figures Key words: Systematization, cladistic analyses, Solenogastres (¼ Neomeniomorpha), Caudofoveata (¼ Chaetodermomorpha), Aculifera, Amphineura, Johannes Thiele, Ernst Vanho¨ ffen, First German South Polar Expedition, “Gauss”, “Valdivia”. Abstract Aplacophoran molluscs are a small, often neglected and still poorly known but phylogenetically important basal group, with taxa possessing morphological characters considered essential for the reconstruction of the basal Mollusca and their evolution. Currently, in most textbooks of zoology and major malacological treatise Solenogastres and Caudofoveata are viewed as con- stituting a monophyletic clade called Aplacophora Von Ihering, 1876, although evidence is available to the contrary, suggest- ing the latter to be a paraphyletic grade. Accordingly, the hitherto accepted “Aplacophora” may consist of two Recent, diphy- letic taxa, viz. Solenogastres Gegenbaur, 1878 (sensu Simroth, 1893) or Neomeniomorpha Pelseneer, 1906 (also called Ventroplicida Boettger, 1955) and Caudofoveata Boettger, 1955 or Chaetodermomorpha Pelseneer, 1906. The Museum of Natural History Berlin (formerly Zoological Museum Berlin, ZMB) houses rich type material essentially of Solenogastres on which to a substantial degree the preeminent German malacologist Johannes Thiele (1860–1935), working as curator in this collection from 1905 on, has based his respective systematic accounts of that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa 1668:245–264 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (Print Edition) ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (Online Edition)
    Zootaxa 1668:245–264 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Annelida* GREG W. ROUSE1 & FREDRIK PLEIJEL2 1Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla CA, 92093-0202, USA. E-mail: grouse@ucsd.edu 2Department of Marine Ecology, Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory, Göteborg University, SE-452 96 Strömstad, Sweden. E-mail: fredrik.pleijel@tmbl.gu.se *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . .245 Introduction . .245 Major polychaete taxa . .250 Monophyly of Annelida . .255 Molecular sequence data . 258 Rooting the annelid tree . .259 References . 261 Abstract The first annelids were formally described by Linnaeus (1758) and we here briefly review the history and composition of the group. The traditionally recognized classes were Polychaeta, Oligochaeta and Hirudinea. The latter two are now viewed as the taxon Clitellata, since recognizing Hirudinea with class rank renders Oligochaeta paraphyletic. Polychaeta appears to contain Clitellata, and so may be synonymous with Annelida. Current consensus would place previously rec- ognized phyla such as Echiura, Pogonophora, Sipuncula and Vestimentifera as annelids, though relationships among these and the various other annelid lineages are still unresolved. Key words: Polychaeta, Oligochaeta, Clitellata, Echiura, Pogonophora, Vestimentifera, Sipuncula, phylogeny, review Introduction Annelida is a group commonly referred to as segmented worms, found worldwide in terrestrial, freshwater and marine habitats. The first annelids were formally named by Linnaeus, including well-known forms such as the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris Linnaeus, 1758, the medicinal leech Hirudo medicinalis Linnaeus, 1758, and the sea-mouse Aphrodite aculeata Linnaeus, 1758.
    [Show full text]
  • Cours De Zoologie
    الجمهورية الجزائرية الديمقراطية الشعبية REPUBLIQUE ALGÉRIENNE DEMOCRATIQUE ET POPULAIRE وزارة التعليم العالي والبحث العلمي MINISTRE DE L’ENSEINGNEMENT SUPERIEURE ET DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE Université Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1 Faculté de Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie COURS DE ZOOLOGIE 2éme année Licence Dr SOFRANE Zina 2018- 2019 Sommaire 1. Présentation du règne animal 1.1. Classification................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Nomenclature zoologique............................................................................................. 2 1.3. Evolution et phylogénie................................................................................................ 3 1.4. Importance numérique du règne animal........................................................................ 6 2. Sous-règne des Protozoaires 2.1. Généralités sur les Protozoaires.................................................................................... 9 2.2. Classification................................................................................................................. 11 2.2.1. Embranchement Sarcomastigophora...................................................................... 11 2.2.2. Embranchement Ciliophora.................................................................................... 12 2.2.3. Embranchement Apicomplexa................................................................................ 16 2.2.3. Embranchement Cnidosporidies............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Micrornas Resolve an Apparent Conflict Between Annelid
    Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on November 8, 2010 Proc. R. Soc. B (2009) 276, 4315–4322 doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1340 Published online 15 September 2009 MicroRNAs resolve an apparent conflict between annelid systematics and their fossil record Erik A. Sperling1, Jakob Vinther1, Vanessa N. Moy5, Benjamin M. Wheeler3, Marie Se´mon4, Derek E. G. Briggs1,2 and Kevin J. Peterson5,* 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, and 2Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 3Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA 4Institut de Ge´nomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Universite´ de Lyon, Universite´ Lyon 1, CNRS, INRA, Ecole Normale Supe´rieure de Lyon, 46 alle´e d’Italie, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France 5Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, North College Street, Hanover, NH 03755, USA Both the monophyly and inter-relationships of the major annelid groups have remained uncertain, despite intensive research on both morphology and molecular sequences. Morphological cladistic analyses indi- cate that Annelida is monophyletic and consists of two monophyletic groups, the clitellates and polychaetes, whereas molecular phylogenetic analyses suggest that polychaetes are paraphyletic and that sipunculans are crown-group annelids. Both the monophyly of polychaetes and the placement of sipunculans within annelids are in conflict with the annelid fossil record—the former because Cambrian stem taxa are similar to modern polychaetes in possessing biramous parapodia, suggesting that clitellates are derived from polychaetes; the latter because although fossil sipunculans are known from the Early Cambrian, crown-group annelids do not appear until the latest Cambrian. Here we apply a different data source, the presence versus absence of specific microRNAs—genes that encode approximately 22 nucleotide non-coding regulatory RNAs—to the problem of annelid phylogenetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Hard and Soft Anatomy in Two Genera of Dondersiidae (Mollusca, Aplacophora, Solenogastres)
    Reference: Biol. Bull. 222: 233–269. (June 2012) © 2012 Marine Biological Laboratory Hard and Soft Anatomy in Two Genera of Dondersiidae (Mollusca, Aplacophora, Solenogastres) AME´ LIE H. SCHELTEMA1,*, CHRISTOFFER SCHANDER2†, AND KEVIN M. KOCOT3 1Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Biology Dept., Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543; 2University Museum of Bergen, P.O. Box 7800, Bergen N-5020, Norway; Uni Environment, Uni Research AS, Bergen N-5020, Norway; and 3Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 101 Rouse Life Sciences, Auburn, Alabama 36849 Abstract. Phylogenetic relationships and identifications Introduction in the aplacophoran taxon Solenogastres (Neomeniomor- pha) are in flux largely because descriptions of hard parts–– The cylindrical, vermiform, sclerite-covered Aplaco- sclerites, radulae, copulatory spicules––and body shape phora has been a perplexing taxon of molluscs ever since have often not been adequately illustrated or utilized. With the first two species, representatives of the only two clades, easily recognizable and accessible hard parts, descriptions were discovered: Chaetoderma nitidulum Love´n, 1844, ϭ of Solenogastres are of greater use, not just to solenogaster Caudofoveata ( Chaetodermomorpha Pelseneer) and Neo- ϭ taxonomists, but also to ecologists, paleontologists, and menia carinata Tullberg, 1875, Solenogastres ( Neomen- evolutionary biologists. Phylogenetic studies of Aplaco- iomorpha Pelseneer). The puzzle was first of all whether N. carinata phora, Mollusca, and the Lophotrochozoa as a whole, they were molluscs at all, because lacks a radula, and the radula of C. nitidulum is a strange, 2-den- whether morphological or molecular, would be enhanced. ticled affair attached to a long cuticular cone. Indeed, the As an example, morphologic characters, both isolated hard great malacologist Johannes Thiele, with far less informa- parts and internal anatomy, are provided for two genera in tion than is now available, and who published over 20 the Dondersiidae.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Savannah' Hypothesis for Early Bilaterian Evolution
    Biol. Rev. (2017), 92, pp. 446–473. 446 doi: 10.1111/brv.12239 The origin of the animals and a ‘Savannah’ hypothesis for early bilaterian evolution Graham E. Budd1,∗ and Soren¨ Jensen2 1Palaeobiology Programme, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villav¨agen 16, SE 752 40 Uppsala, Sweden 2Area´ de Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain ABSTRACT The earliest evolution of the animals remains a taxing biological problem, as all extant clades are highly derived and the fossil record is not usually considered to be helpful. The rise of the bilaterian animals recorded in the fossil record, commonly known as the ‘Cambrian explosion’, is one of the most significant moments in evolutionary history, and was an event that transformed first marine and then terrestrial environments. We review the phylogeny of early animals and other opisthokonts, and the affinities of the earliest large complex fossils, the so-called ‘Ediacaran’ taxa. We conclude, based on a variety of lines of evidence, that their affinities most likely lie in various stem groups to large metazoan groupings; a new grouping, the Apoikozoa, is erected to encompass Metazoa and Choanoflagellata. The earliest reasonable fossil evidence for total-group bilaterians comes from undisputed complex trace fossils that are younger than about 560 Ma, and these diversify greatly as the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary is crossed a few million years later. It is generally considered that as the bilaterians diversified after this time, their burrowing behaviour destroyed the cyanobacterial mat-dominated substrates that the enigmatic Ediacaran taxa were associated with, the so-called ‘Cambrian substrate revolution’, leading to the loss of almost all Ediacara-aspect diversity in the Cambrian.
    [Show full text]
  • Solenogastres, Caudofoveata, and Polyplacophora
    4 Solenogastres, Caudofoveata, and Polyplacophora Christiane Todt, Akiko Okusu, Christoffer Schander, and Enrico Schwabe SOLENOGASTRES The phylogenetic relationships among the molluscan classes have been debated for There are about 240 described species of decades, but there is now general agree- Solenogastres (Figure 4.1 A–C), but many more ment that the most basal extant groups are are likely to be found (Glaubrecht et al. 2005). the “aplacophoran” Solenogastres (ϭ Neo- These animals have a narrow, ciliated, gliding meniomorpha), the Caudofoveata (ϭ Chae- sole located in a ventral groove—the ventral todermomorpha) and the Polyplacophora. fold or foot—on which they crawl on hard or Nevertheless, these relatively small groups, soft substrates, or on the cnidarian colonies especially the mostly minute, inconspicuous, on which they feed (e.g., Salvini-Plawen 1967; and deep-water-dwelling Solenogastres and Scheltema and Jebb 1994; Okusu and Giribet Caudofoveata, are among the least known 2003). Anterior to the mouth is a unique sen- higher taxa within the Mollusca. sory region: the vestibulum or atrial sense Solenogastres and Caudofoveata are marine, organ. The foregut is a muscular tube and usu- worm-shaped animals. Their body is covered by ally bears a radula. Unlike other molluscs, the cuticle and aragonitic sclerites, which give them midgut of solenogasters is not divided in com- their characteristic shiny appearance. They have partments but unifi es the functions of a stom- been grouped together in the higher taxon Aplac- ach, midgut gland, and intestine (e.g., Todt and ophora (e.g., Hyman 1967; Scheltema 1988, Salvini-Plawen 2004b). The small posterior 1993, 1996; Ivanov 1996), but this grouping is pallial cavity lacks ctenidia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusks, Worms, Arthropods, and Echinoderms As Shown
    22 Mollusks, Worms, Arthropods, Echinoderms hat do fiddler crabs run- ning along the beach have Win common with pill bugs and millipedes you might discover under a rock in your yard? How many mosquitoes have bitten you? These animals and more than a million other species belong to the largest, most diverse group of animals—the arthropods. In this chapter, you will learn about arthropods, as well as mollusks, worms, and echinoderms. What do you think? Science Journal Look at the picture below with a classmate. Discuss what you think this might be. Here’s a hint: It can be found in your house. Write your answer or best guess in your Science Journal. 36 ◆ C f you’ve ever walked along a beach, especially EXPLORE Iafter a storm, you’ve probably seen many seashells. They come in many different colors, shapes, and sizes. ACTIVITY If you look closely, you will see that some shells have many rings or bands. In the following activity, find out what the bands tell you about the shell and the organism that made it. Examine a clam’s shell 1. Use a hand lens to examine a clam’s shell. 2. Count the number of rings or bands on the shell. Count as number one the large, top point called the crown. 3. Compare the distances between the bands of the shell. Observe Do other students’shells have the same number of bands? Are all of the bands on your shell the same width? What do you think the bands represent, and why are some wider than others? Record your answers in your Science Journal.
    [Show full text]