Solenogastres, Caudofoveata, and Polyplacophora
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
4 Solenogastres, Caudofoveata, and Polyplacophora Christiane Todt, Akiko Okusu, Christoffer Schander, and Enrico Schwabe SOLENOGASTRES The phylogenetic relationships among the molluscan classes have been debated for There are about 240 described species of decades, but there is now general agree- Solenogastres (Figure 4.1 A–C), but many more ment that the most basal extant groups are are likely to be found (Glaubrecht et al. 2005). the “aplacophoran” Solenogastres (ϭ Neo- These animals have a narrow, ciliated, gliding meniomorpha), the Caudofoveata (ϭ Chae- sole located in a ventral groove—the ventral todermomorpha) and the Polyplacophora. fold or foot—on which they crawl on hard or Nevertheless, these relatively small groups, soft substrates, or on the cnidarian colonies especially the mostly minute, inconspicuous, on which they feed (e.g., Salvini-Plawen 1967; and deep-water-dwelling Solenogastres and Scheltema and Jebb 1994; Okusu and Giribet Caudofoveata, are among the least known 2003). Anterior to the mouth is a unique sen- higher taxa within the Mollusca. sory region: the vestibulum or atrial sense Solenogastres and Caudofoveata are marine, organ. The foregut is a muscular tube and usu- worm-shaped animals. Their body is covered by ally bears a radula. Unlike other molluscs, the cuticle and aragonitic sclerites, which give them midgut of solenogasters is not divided in com- their characteristic shiny appearance. They have partments but unifi es the functions of a stom- been grouped together in the higher taxon Aplac- ach, midgut gland, and intestine (e.g., Todt and ophora (e.g., Hyman 1967; Scheltema 1988, Salvini-Plawen 2004b). The small posterior 1993, 1996; Ivanov 1996), but this grouping is pallial cavity lacks ctenidia. The smallest soleno- viewed as paraphyletic by others (e.g., Salvini- gasters measure less than a millimeter in body Plawen 1972, 1980, 1981b, 1985, 2003; Salvini- length (e.g., Meiomenia swedmarki, Meioherpia Plawen and Steiner 1996; Haszprunar 2000; atlantica), whereas the largest species are more Haszprunar et al., Chapter 2). than 30 cm long (e.g., Epimenia babai) and 71 FIGURE 4.1. Living specimens of Solenogastres (A, B, C), Caudofoveata (D), and Polyplacophora (E). (A) Epimenia n. sp., from Japan, on its gorgonian prey, scale bar: 1 cm; there are blue patches on the dorsal mantle surface. From Okusu 2003. (B) Specimens of Wirenia argentea from Galicia (Spain) (micrograph by V. Urgorri), scale bar: 1.5 mm. (C) Biserramenia psammobionta from Galicia (Spain); note the long epidermal spicules of this interstitial animal (micrograph by V. Urgorri), scale bar: 0.25 mm. (D) Prochaetoderma sp. from Galicia, Spain; note the terminal knob with fringe of long, pointed sclerites at the posterium (micrograph by V. Urgorri), scale bar: 0.5 mm. (E) Acanthopleura gemmata, Sulawesi, Indonesia; with long hair-like projections covering the girdle; photo taken in the animal’s natural habitat. often colorful (Okusu 2003). There are a num- some comprehensive studies that focused on ber of overviews of solenogaster morphology the histology of the integument (Hoffman 1949) (e.g., Thiele 1913; Hoffmann 1930; Hyman 1967; or the histology or physiology of the digestive Salvini-Plawen 1971, 1978, 1985) and microscopic tract (Baba 1940a; Salvini-Plawen 1967, 1981a, anatomy (Scheltema et al. 1994), and there are 1988; Scheltema 1981). 72 solenogastres, caudofoveata, and polyplacophora CAUDOFOVEATA like fossil taxa. The general morphology of Polyplacophora, with some information on In Caudofoveata, a ventral groove and foot are histology, was described by Plate (1897, 1901), lacking (Figure 4.1D). The mouth opening is Hyman (1967), Kaas and Van Belle (1985), and partly or entirely surrounded by an oral shield Wingstrand (1985). Information on their micro- (foot shield), an area covered by a thick layer scopic anatomy was compiled by Eernisse and of cuticle without sclerites. Caudofoveates are Reynolds (1994). These animals, commonly infaunal and feed on detritus or selectively referred to as chitons, are dorsoventrally fl at- on foraminiferans by burrowing in the mud tened, exclusively marine molluscs character- with their oral shield. They have a muscular ized by the presence of eight dorsal aragonitic foregut bearing a radula, and their posterior shell plates (valves) and a broad ventral ciliated midgut is divided into a dorsal tubular region foot (Figures. 4.1E, 4.6A). The likewise ventrally (midgut duct) and a ventral midgut sac. The positioned head is separated from the foot by a small, posterior pallial cavity bears a pair of true transverse groove. Surrounding the dorsal shell ctenidia. Caudofoveates range in length from plates—or even completely engulfi ng them in a few millimeters (e.g., Prochaetoderma radu- some species—there is a thick marginal girdle liferum; Falcidens sterreri) to 14 cm (e.g., Chae- (perinotum) covered by a chitinous cuticle. toderma productum). Three major body regions Embedded in this cuticle are calcium carbon- are defi ned: anterium, trunk, and posterium. ate sclerites (Figure 4.6B), which are only occa- The latter may consist of a narrow shank and sionally lacking, and sometimes the cuticle a terminal knob with characteristic elongate additionally bears corneous processes (e.g., in sclerites (typical for Prochaetodermatidae). With Chaetopleura). The shell plates display a complex very few exceptions (e.g., Chaetoderma rubrum), morphology and are composed of four layers: caudofoveates are beige to brownish in color. properiostracum, tegmentum, articulamentum, About 120 species have been described so far and myostracum. The articulamentum projects (Glaubrecht et al. 2005). In caudofoveates, aside anteriorly and laterally beyond the tegmen- from the sometimes highly specialized radula, tum to form the sutural laminae and insertion the variation in structure and arrangement of plates. The shell plates characteristically bear internal organs is limited, and knowledge of so-called aesthetes, unique photo- and probably internal anatomy is mostly based on older stud- also mechano- and chemosensoric organs and ies (e.g.,Wirén 1892; Thiele 1913; Hoffmann in certain taxa ocelli (Figure 4.6C). The head in 1930; van Lummel 1930; Hyman 1967; Salvini- general lacks eyes and tentacles, but the mouth Plawen 1971, 1975, 1985; Scheltema et al. 1994). opening is laterally fl anked by mouth lappets. Occasionally (e.g., in the genus Placiphorella) POLYPLACOPHORA precephalic tentacles, which support the animal The monophyly of Polyplacophora has been well while feeding, may occur. The mantle cavity or established (most recently Okusu et al. 2003), pallial groove surrounds the foot and accom- even if in a recent molecular analysis a spe- modates the terminal anal papilla, a multi- cies of monoplacophoran appears to be nested tude of laterally positioned ctenidia, the paired within the chitons (Giribet et al. 2006). The osphradium, and lateral sense organs. Chitons name Polyplacophora dates back to Gray (1821), have complex muscle systems, including eight but the term Placophora, which was fi rst used paired sets of dorsoventral muscle units that by von Ihering (1876), is common, too, espe- insert at the shell plates, the musculus rectus, cially in German literature. The latter term is which runs longitudinally underneath the shell also used informally (e.g., Lindberg and Ponder plates, and a circular enrolling muscle. Usually 1996; Parkhaev, Chapter 3) to encompass the chitons are grazers with a broad and exception- Aplacophora, Polyplacophora, and mollusc- ally long stereoglossate radula (Figure 4.6D). solenogastres, caudofoveata, and polyplacophora 73 FIGURE 4.2. Alternative phylogenies for the placement of Solenogastres, Caudofoveata and Polyplacophora relative to Conchifera. (A). Aplacophora and Testaria as sister groups (after Waller 1998). (B) Aplacophora as Monophylum, Amphineura (Aculifera) sister group to Conchifera (after Ivanov 1996; Scheltema 1996). (C) Solenogastres and Caudofoveata as independent clades with Solenogastres branching earliest (after most parsimonious tree in Salvini-Plawen and Steiner 1996), additionally Caudofoveata grouping with Testaria into Hepagastralia (after Haszprunar 2000). (D) Solenogastres and Caudofoveata as independent clades with unresolved relationship to Testaria (after Salvini-Plawen and Steiner 1996; Salvini-Plawen 2003). Their diet consists mainly of diatoms, detritus, 1876a, b; Spengel 1881; Hoffmann 1930), while and encrusting algae, but special feeding habits a clade Aculifera was proposed for those groups have been adopted by the carnivorous Placi- having a cuticle with sclerites covering at least phorella and Lepidozona (Latyshev et al. 2004), part of the mantle (e.g., Hatschek 1891; Scheltema the xylophagous Ferreiraella (Sirenko 2004), 1988, 1996; Ivanov 1996). Other authors have or the true herbivorous Stenochiton. There are argued that aplacophorans are paraphyletic with about 920 living species (Schwabe 2005), most respect to a clade Testaria, comprising the remain- living in the marine intertidal or sublittoral, ing molluscs, within which Polyplacophora is a with some deep-sea species also known (Kaas sister taxon to Conchifera (e.g., Wingstrand 1985; et al. 1998). Salvini-Plawen 1980, 1985, 1990, 2003; Salvini- relationships The two aplacophoran taxa Plawen and Steiner 1996). Based on midgut and Polyplacophora were, and still are, consid- morphology, Haszprunar (2000) additionally ered by most morphologists as basal within defi nes the clade Hepagastralia