DOCSLIB.ORG

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 30.11.2011 SEC(2011) 1446 Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 30.11.2011 SEC(2011) 1446 Final EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 30.11.2011 SEC(2011) 1446 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on further implementation of the European satellite navigation programmes (2014 – 2020) {COM(2011) 814 final} {SEC(2011) 1447 final} EN 2 EN TABLE OF CONTENTS Definitions.................................................................................................................................. 7 1. Procedural issues and consultation of interested parties.............................................. 9 1.1. Identification ................................................................................................................ 9 1.2. Organisation and timing............................................................................................... 9 1.3. Consultation and expertise ........................................................................................... 9 1.4. Scrutiny by the Commission Impact Assessment Board ........................................... 11 2. Context ....................................................................................................................... 12 2.1. Europe needs a global navigation system: rationale and added value ....................... 12 2.2. Governance, financing and legal framework ............................................................. 16 2.2.1. Galileo: Objectives, infrastructure and implementation phases................................. 18 2.2.2. EGNOS: Objectives, infrastructure and implementation phases ............................... 19 3. Problem definition...................................................................................................... 20 3.1. Challenges.................................................................................................................. 20 3.2. Evaluations of the GNSS programmes ...................................................................... 20 3.2.1. Galileo 21 3.2.2. EGNOS 23 3.3. The problem that requires action................................................................................ 23 3.4. Who is affected, in what ways and to what extent? ................................................... 24 3.5. Foreseen evolution of the problem............................................................................. 25 3.6. EU right to act ............................................................................................................ 26 4. Objectives................................................................................................................... 26 4.1. General policy objectives........................................................................................... 26 4.2. Specific policy objectives .......................................................................................... 27 4.3. Consistency with other policies and objectives ......................................................... 28 5. Policy options............................................................................................................. 29 5.1. Policy options for problem 1: Way forward on further implementation and exploitation of the European GNSS programmes...................................................... 29 5.1.1. Galileo 29 5.1.2. EGNOS 31 5.2. Policy options for problem 2: Governance scheme for the exploitation of both Galileo and EGNOS systems ..................................................................................... 31 EN 3 EN 5.2.1. Identification of functions to be performed during exploitation phase...................... 32 5.2.2. Organisation of the programme management functions ............................................ 33 5.2.3. Political supervision................................................................................................... 34 5.2.4. Options for programme management......................................................................... 34 5.3. Summary .................................................................................................................... 35 6. Analysis of impacts.................................................................................................... 37 6.1. Analysis of impacts for problem 1: Way forward on further implementation and exploitation of the European GNSS programmes...................................................... 37 6.1.1. Analysis of benefits.................................................................................................... 37 6.1.2. Direct revenues 41 6.1.3. Analysis of costs 42 6.1.4. Sector-specific impacts .............................................................................................. 43 6.2. Analysis of impacts for problem 2: Governance scheme for the exploitation of both Galileo and EGNOS systems ..................................................................................... 46 6.2.1. EU Regulatory agency ............................................................................................... 46 6.2.2. EU public company.................................................................................................... 48 7. Comparing the options ............................................................................................... 49 7.1. Comparing the options for problem 1: Way forward on further implementation and exploitation of the European GNSS programmes...................................................... 49 7.2. Comparing the options for problem 2: Governance scheme for the exploitation of both Galileo and EGNOS systems ............................................................................. 53 8. Monitoring and evaluation ......................................................................................... 55 8.1. Indicators.................................................................................................................... 55 8.2. Monitoring and evaluation......................................................................................... 55 9. Annexes...................................................................................................................... 57 Annex I - Overview of the Mid-term review of the European satellite radio navigation programmes (COM(2011) 5 final)............................................................................. 58 Annex II - Overview of the stakeholder consultations............................................................. 59 Annex III - Studies and articles................................................................................................61 Annex IV – Sector-specific impacts......................................................................................... 62 Annex V - EU publications on GNSS...................................................................................... 81 Annex VI: GNSS Market Monitoring and Forecasting Tool: Methodology ........................... 88 Annex VII – Performance maps............................................................................................... 94 EN 4 EN Annex VIII – Galileo SoL service re-profiling ........................................................................ 95 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Overall schedule of the implementation of the Galileo programme......................... 21 Figure 2: Functions of political supervision and programme management ............................. 33 Figure 3: Overview of policy options ...................................................................................... 35 Figure 4: Value-chain of industries affected by the GNSS programmes................................. 44 Figure 5: Clustering of infrastructure options used to review sector-specific impacts............ 44 Figure 6: Review of identified positioning, navigation and timing applications in Road transport market........................................................................................................................ 72 Figure 7: Assessment of Galileo’s impact on Road Segment – Focus on product enabled market....................................................................................................................................... 73 Figure 8: Typology of road applications.................................................................................. 74 Figure 9: Typical value chain by typology of application ....................................................... 74 Figure 10: Structure of the MMFP........................................................................................... 88 Figure 11: List of sector-specific assumptions used in MMFP (example of LBS sector). ...... 89 Figure 12: List of global assumptions used in MMFP............................................................. 90 Figure 13: Mapping of public benefits with GNSS applications in road transport.................. 92 Figure 14: Example of calculation of public benefits: time savings in road transport............. 92 Figure 15: List of assumptions used in Public Utility Model (example of LBS sector).......... 92 Figure 16: Performance map for option (4) Galileo horizontal accuracy [m] ........................ 94 Figure 17: Performance map for option (3) Galileo horizontal accuracy [m] ........................ 94 Figure 18: Performance map for options (1) and (2) Galileo horizontal accuracy [m] .......... 94 TABLE OF TABLES Table 1: Policy options for problem 1.....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Adjustment of THEMIS IR Line Scanner Camera Image Measurements
    Modeling and Adjustment of THEMIS IR Line Scanner Camera Image Measurements by Brent Archinal USGS Astrogeology Team 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 [email protected] As of 2004 December 9 Version 1.0 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. General 1.2. Conventions 2. Observations Equations and Their Partials 2.1. Line Scanner Camera Specific Modeling 2.2. Partials for New Parameters 2.2.1. Orientation Partials 2.2.2. Spatial Partials 2.2.3. Partials of the observations with respect to the parameters 2.2.4. Parameter Weighting 3. Adjustment Model 4. Implementation 4.1. Input/Output Changes 4.1.1. Image Measurements 4.1.2. SPICE Data 4.1.3. Program Control (Parameters) Information 4.2. Computational Changes 4.2.1. Generation of A priori Information 4.2.2. Partial derivatives 4.2.3. Solution Output 5. Testing and Near Term Work 6. Future Work Acknowledgements References Useful web sites Appendix I - Partial Transcription of Colvin (1992) Documentation Appendix II - HiRISE Sensor Model Information 1. Introduction 1.1 General The overall problem we’re solving is that we want to be able to set up the relationships between the coordinates of arbitrary physical points in space (e.g. ground points) and their coordinates on line scanner (or “pushbroom”) camera images. We then want to do a least squares solution in order to come up with consistent camera orientation and position information that represents these relationships accurately. For now, supported by funding from the NASA Critical Data Products initiative (for 2003 September to 2005 August), we will concentrate on handling the THEMIS IR camera system (Christensen et al., 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of Physics Research in the UK: Satellite Navigation Case Study
    The economic impact of physics research in the UK: Satellite Navigation Case Study A report for STFC November 2012 Contents Executive Summary................................................................................... 3 1 The science behind satellite navigation......................................... 4 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 4 1.2 The science................................................................................................ 4 1.3 STFC’s role in satellite navigation.............................................................. 6 1.4 Conclusions................................................................................................ 8 2 Economic impact of satellite navigation ........................................ 9 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Summary impact of GPS ........................................................................... 9 2.3 The need for Galileo................................................................................. 10 2.4 Definition of the satellite navigation industry............................................ 10 2.5 Methodological approach......................................................................... 11 2.6 Upstream direct impacts .......................................................................... 12 2.7 Downstream direct impacts.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of the Moon
    Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • ALBERT VAN HELDEN + HUYGENS’S RING CASSINI’S DIVISION O & O SATURN’S CHILDREN
    _ ALBERT VAN HELDEN + HUYGENS’S RING CASSINI’S DIVISION o & o SATURN’S CHILDREN )0g-_ DIBNER LIBRARY LECTURE , HUYGENS’S RING, CASSINI’S DIVISION & SATURN’S CHILDREN c !@ _+++++++++ l ++++++++++ _) _) _) _) _)HUYGENS’S RING, _)CASSINI’S DIVISION _) _)& _)SATURN’S CHILDREN _) _) _)DDDDD _) _) _)Albert van Helden _) _) _) , _) _) _)_ _) _) _) _) _) · _) _) _) ; {(((((((((QW(((((((((} , 20013–7012 Text Copyright ©2006 Albert van Helden. All rights reserved. A H is Professor Emeritus at Rice University and the Univer- HUYGENS’S RING, CASSINI’S DIVISION sity of Utrecht, Netherlands, where he resides and teaches on a regular basis. He received his B.S and M.S. from Stevens Institute of Technology, M.A. from the AND SATURN’S CHILDREN University of Michigan and Ph.D. from Imperial College, University of London. Van Helden is a renowned author who has published respected books and arti- cles about the history of science, including the translation of Galileo’s “Sidereus Nuncius” into English. He has numerous periodical contributions to his credit and has served on the editorial boards of Air and Space, 1990-present; Journal for the History of Astronomy, 1988-present; Isis, 1989–1994; and Tractrix, 1989–1995. During his tenure at Rice University (1970–2001), van Helden was instrumental in establishing the “Galileo Project,”a Web-based source of information on the life and work of Galileo Galilei and the science of his time. A native of the Netherlands, Professor van Helden returned to his homeland in 2001 to join the faculty of Utrecht University.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Nov 08
    NAVIGATION ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS Collected by David Broughton These may be reproduced freely, but please inform the Royal Institute of Navigation of any amendments or additions via e-mail ([email protected]) or fax (+44 20 7591 3131). ‘ minute (= 1º/60) 112 European emergency phone number (= 911 in US, 999 in UK) 1st4sport Awarding body of the NCF Qualifications 2-AFC two-alternative forced-choice (procedure used in animal studies) 2dRMS twice distance root-mean-square Twice the root-mean-square of the radial distances from the true position to the observed positions obtained from a number of trials. Should contain 95% of observed positions. 2SOPS 2nd Space Operations Sqn (of 50th Space Wing)(USAF) Exercise command and control of GPS satellite constellation. 3DNC Three-dimensional digital navigational chart 3G third generation (of mobile phone technology or telematics) There is also 2G, 2.5G and 4G for phones. 3GPP 3G Partnership Project 3GT 3rd Generation Telematics (ERTICO and OSGi project) 802.11 a wireless interconnection standard with a range of 50 metres Also known as WiFi. An IEEE standard. 911 US emergency phone number (= 112 in Europe, 999 in UK) a atto (SI unit multiplier of 10-18) a semi-major axis of ellipse (for WGS-84 = 6,378,137 m) A-band NATO radar band 0-250 MHz = > 1.2 m A-GNSS (AGNSS) Assisted GNSS A-GPS (AGPS) Assisted GPS A-NPA Advance Notice of Proposed Amendment (EU JAA) A-NPRM Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FAA, FCC etc) A-S anti-spoofing In GPS the use of encryption to prevent a P-Code receiver locking to a bogus P-Code transmission.
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo: Recent Developments
    House of Commons Transport Committee Galileo: Recent Developments First Report of Session 2007–08 HC 53 Incorporating HC 1055, Session 2006–07 House of Commons Transport Committee Galileo: Recent Developments First Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 7 November 2007 HC 53 Incorporating HC 1055, Session 2006–07 Published on 12 November 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody MP (Labour, Crewe and Nantwich) (Chairman) Mr David Clelland MP (Labour, Tyne Bridge) Clive Efford MP (Labour, Eltham) Mrs Louise Ellman MP (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) Mr Philip Hollobone MP (Conservative, Kettering) Mr John Leech MP (Liberal Democrat, Manchester, Withington) Mr Eric Martlew MP (Labour, Carlisle) Mr Lee Scott MP (Conservative, Ilford North) David Simpson MP (Democratic Unionist, Upper Bann) Mr Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Mr David Wilshire MP (Conservative, Spelthorne) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/transcom.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition Policy and Collection Development in Astronomical Libraries in Italy: Two Test Cases
    Library and Information Services in Astronomy III ASP Conference Series, Vol. 153, 1998 U. Grothkopf, H. Andernach, S. Stevens-Rayburn, and M. Gomez (eds.) Acquisition Policy and Collection Development in Astronomical Libraries in Italy: Two Test Cases Antonella Gasperini Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Firenze, Italy Francesca Martines Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo \G.S.Vaiana", Palermo, Italy Abstract. We have analysed the acquisition policy of two Italian as- tronomical libraries, similar in typology, but geographically distant: the Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory Library, in Florence, and the Palermo Astronomical Observatory Library. 1. Introduction It is very important to organise a correct management of acquisitions in a library and to determine the criteria on which the collection development should depend, especially in subjects like astronomy and astrophysics and related fields, in which there is a continuous updating. We have analysed the situation of two Italian astronomical libraries, similar in typology, but geographically distant: the first one is the library of the Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory, in Florence, and the second one is the library of the Palermo Astronomical Observatory. They are different in size, activity and history. We have focused our attention on the last twenty years, with special emphasis on the period from 1987 to 1997. This choice was due to a radical change in astronomy in the late seventies which therefore influenced astronomical publications. Moreover, the last twenty years have also represented an important phase in the life of the two Observatories, for different reasons. We summarise the characteristics and amount of collections of each of them and identify the specific profiles and needs of their parent institutions and their influence on the acquisition policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo In-Situ Dust Measurements in Jupiter's Gossamer Rings
    Galileo In-Situ Dust Measurements in Jupiter’s Gossamer Rings Harald Krüger, Douglas P. Hamilton, Richard Moissl, Eberhard Grün To cite this version: Harald Krüger, Douglas P. Hamilton, Richard Moissl, Eberhard Grün. Galileo In-Situ Dust Measurements in Jupiter’s Gossamer Rings. Icarus, Elsevier, 2009, 203 (1), pp.198. 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.03.040. hal-00567273 HAL Id: hal-00567273 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00567273 Submitted on 20 Feb 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accepted Manuscript Galileo In-Situ Dust Measurements in Jupiter’s Gossamer Rings Harald Krüger, Douglas P. Hamilton, Richard Moissl, Eberhard Grün PII: S0019-1035(09)00178-X DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.03.040 Reference: YICAR 9008 To appear in: Icarus Received Date: 13 March 2008 Revised Date: 16 December 2008 Accepted Date: 23 March 2009 Please cite this article as: Krüger, H., Hamilton, D.P., Moissl, R., Grün, E., Galileo In-Situ Dust Measurements in Jupiter’s Gossamer Rings, Icarus (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.03.040 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Voyage to Jupiter. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 312 131 SE 050 900 AUTHOR Morrison, David; Samz, Jane TITLE Voyage to Jupiter. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC. Scientific and Technical Information Branch. REPORT NO NASA-SP-439 PUB DATE 80 NOTE 208p.; Colored photographs and drawings may not reproduce well. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 ($9.00). PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Aerospace Technology; *Astronomy; Satellites (Aerospace); Science Materials; *Science Programs; *Scientific Research; Scientists; *Space Exploration; *Space Sciences IDENTIFIERS *Jupiter; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; *Voyager Mission ABSTRACT This publication illustrates the features of Jupiter and its family of satellites pictured by the Pioneer and the Voyager missions. Chapters included are:(1) "The Jovian System" (describing the history of astronomy);(2) "Pioneers to Jupiter" (outlining the Pioneer Mission); (3) "The Voyager Mission"; (4) "Science and Scientsts" (listing 11 science investigations and the scientists in the Voyager Mission);.(5) "The Voyage to Jupiter--Cetting There" (describing the launch and encounter phase);(6) 'The First Encounter" (showing pictures of Io and Callisto); (7) "The Second Encounter: More Surprises from the 'Land' of the Giant" (including pictures of Ganymede and Europa); (8) "Jupiter--King of the Planets" (describing the weather, magnetosphere, and rings of Jupiter); (9) "Four New Worlds" (discussing the nature of the four satellites); and (10) "Return to Jupiter" (providing future plans for Jupiter exploration). Pictorial maps of the Galilean satellites, a list of Voyager science teams, and a list of the Voyager management team are appended. Eight technical and 12 non-technical references are provided as additional readings.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing the Next Galileo, a Children's Musical
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Summer 2014 Writing The exN t Galileo, a Children's Musical Joseph Domencic Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Domencic, J. (2014). Writing The exN t Galileo, a Children's Musical (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/492 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WRITING THE NEXT GALILEO, A CHILDREN’S MUSICAL A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Division of the Mary Pappert School Music Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Music: Major in Music Technology By Joseph Domencic August 2014 Copyright by Joseph Domencic 2014 WRITING THE NEXT GALILEO, A CHILDREN’S MUSICAL By Joseph Domencic Approved July 10, 2014 ________________________________ ________________________________ Lynn Emberg Purse, M. M. Judith Bowman, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Music Technology Professor of Music Education & Music Area Chair of Electronic Composition Technology (Committee Chair) (Committee Member) ________________________________ ________________________________ William E. Purse, M. M. Stephen Benham, Ph.D. Professor of Music Technology Director of Graduate Studies (Committee Member) Associate Professor of Music Education ________________________________ Edward Kocher, Ph.D. Dean, Mary Pappert School of Music Professor of Music iii ABSTRACT WRITING THE NEXT GALILEO, A CHILDREN’S MUSICAL By Joseph Domencic August 2014 Thesis supervised by Lynn Emberg Purse This thesis details my process in writing the book, music and lyrics to a one-act children’s musical entitled The Next Galileo; it also includes an analysis of key aspects of the work.
    [Show full text]