EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 30.11.2011 SEC(2011) 1446 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on further implementation of the European satellite navigation programmes (2014 – 2020) {COM(2011) 814 final} {SEC(2011) 1447 final} EN 2 EN TABLE OF CONTENTS Definitions.................................................................................................................................. 7 1. Procedural issues and consultation of interested parties.............................................. 9 1.1. Identification ................................................................................................................ 9 1.2. Organisation and timing............................................................................................... 9 1.3. Consultation and expertise ........................................................................................... 9 1.4. Scrutiny by the Commission Impact Assessment Board ........................................... 11 2. Context ....................................................................................................................... 12 2.1. Europe needs a global navigation system: rationale and added value ....................... 12 2.2. Governance, financing and legal framework ............................................................. 16 2.2.1. Galileo: Objectives, infrastructure and implementation phases................................. 18 2.2.2. EGNOS: Objectives, infrastructure and implementation phases ............................... 19 3. Problem definition...................................................................................................... 20 3.1. Challenges.................................................................................................................. 20 3.2. Evaluations of the GNSS programmes ...................................................................... 20 3.2.1. Galileo 21 3.2.2. EGNOS 23 3.3. The problem that requires action................................................................................ 23 3.4. Who is affected, in what ways and to what extent? ................................................... 24 3.5. Foreseen evolution of the problem............................................................................. 25 3.6. EU right to act ............................................................................................................ 26 4. Objectives................................................................................................................... 26 4.1. General policy objectives........................................................................................... 26 4.2. Specific policy objectives .......................................................................................... 27 4.3. Consistency with other policies and objectives ......................................................... 28 5. Policy options............................................................................................................. 29 5.1. Policy options for problem 1: Way forward on further implementation and exploitation of the European GNSS programmes...................................................... 29 5.1.1. Galileo 29 5.1.2. EGNOS 31 5.2. Policy options for problem 2: Governance scheme for the exploitation of both Galileo and EGNOS systems ..................................................................................... 31 EN 3 EN 5.2.1. Identification of functions to be performed during exploitation phase...................... 32 5.2.2. Organisation of the programme management functions ............................................ 33 5.2.3. Political supervision................................................................................................... 34 5.2.4. Options for programme management......................................................................... 34 5.3. Summary .................................................................................................................... 35 6. Analysis of impacts.................................................................................................... 37 6.1. Analysis of impacts for problem 1: Way forward on further implementation and exploitation of the European GNSS programmes...................................................... 37 6.1.1. Analysis of benefits.................................................................................................... 37 6.1.2. Direct revenues 41 6.1.3. Analysis of costs 42 6.1.4. Sector-specific impacts .............................................................................................. 43 6.2. Analysis of impacts for problem 2: Governance scheme for the exploitation of both Galileo and EGNOS systems ..................................................................................... 46 6.2.1. EU Regulatory agency ............................................................................................... 46 6.2.2. EU public company.................................................................................................... 48 7. Comparing the options ............................................................................................... 49 7.1. Comparing the options for problem 1: Way forward on further implementation and exploitation of the European GNSS programmes...................................................... 49 7.2. Comparing the options for problem 2: Governance scheme for the exploitation of both Galileo and EGNOS systems ............................................................................. 53 8. Monitoring and evaluation ......................................................................................... 55 8.1. Indicators.................................................................................................................... 55 8.2. Monitoring and evaluation......................................................................................... 55 9. Annexes...................................................................................................................... 57 Annex I - Overview of the Mid-term review of the European satellite radio navigation programmes (COM(2011) 5 final)............................................................................. 58 Annex II - Overview of the stakeholder consultations............................................................. 59 Annex III - Studies and articles................................................................................................61 Annex IV – Sector-specific impacts......................................................................................... 62 Annex V - EU publications on GNSS...................................................................................... 81 Annex VI: GNSS Market Monitoring and Forecasting Tool: Methodology ........................... 88 Annex VII – Performance maps............................................................................................... 94 EN 4 EN Annex VIII – Galileo SoL service re-profiling ........................................................................ 95 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Overall schedule of the implementation of the Galileo programme......................... 21 Figure 2: Functions of political supervision and programme management ............................. 33 Figure 3: Overview of policy options ...................................................................................... 35 Figure 4: Value-chain of industries affected by the GNSS programmes................................. 44 Figure 5: Clustering of infrastructure options used to review sector-specific impacts............ 44 Figure 6: Review of identified positioning, navigation and timing applications in Road transport market........................................................................................................................ 72 Figure 7: Assessment of Galileo’s impact on Road Segment – Focus on product enabled market....................................................................................................................................... 73 Figure 8: Typology of road applications.................................................................................. 74 Figure 9: Typical value chain by typology of application ....................................................... 74 Figure 10: Structure of the MMFP........................................................................................... 88 Figure 11: List of sector-specific assumptions used in MMFP (example of LBS sector). ...... 89 Figure 12: List of global assumptions used in MMFP............................................................. 90 Figure 13: Mapping of public benefits with GNSS applications in road transport.................. 92 Figure 14: Example of calculation of public benefits: time savings in road transport............. 92 Figure 15: List of assumptions used in Public Utility Model (example of LBS sector).......... 92 Figure 16: Performance map for option (4) Galileo horizontal accuracy [m] ........................ 94 Figure 17: Performance map for option (3) Galileo horizontal accuracy [m] ........................ 94 Figure 18: Performance map for options (1) and (2) Galileo horizontal accuracy [m] .......... 94 TABLE OF TABLES Table 1: Policy options for problem 1.....................................................................................