DOCSLIB.ORG

Vol. 2, No. 3 (2010) Articles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Goettingen Journal of GoJIL International Law Vol. 2, No. 3 (2010) Articles Unilateral Interpretation of Security Council Resolutions: UK Practice Alexander Orakhelashvili The Legal Significance of Global Development Partnerships: European Development Cooperation and its Contribution to the International Law of Development Markus Kaltenborn Defending the Emergence of the Superior Orders Defense in the Contemporary Context Jessica Liang The Post-9/11 Discourse Revisited – The Self-Image of the International Legal Scientific Discipline Ulf Linderfalk Humanitarian Action – A Scope for the Responsibility to Protect: Part II: Responsibility to Protect - A Legal Device Ready for Use? Marie-José Domestici-Met The Rise of Self-Determination Versus the Rise of Democracy Cécile Vandewoude Current Developments in International Law From Kosovo to Catalunya: Separatism and Integration in Europe Christopher J. Borgen The two Faces of the Internationalized pouvoir constituant: Independence and Constitution-Making under External Influence in Kosovo Michael Riegner The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo: Rules or Principles? Volker Röben Recent Developments in Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Peter Rackow & Cornelius Birr The Millennium Development Goals and Human Rights at 2010 – An Account of the Millennium Summit Outcome Marie von Engelhardt Goettingen Journal of International Law (GoJIL) c/o Göttingen Institute for International and European Law Platz der Göttingen Sieben 5 37073 Göttingen Germany [email protected] www.gojil.eu ISSN 1868-1581 The Goettingen Journal of International Law is published Open Access and semi-annually by Göttingen Law School students. Submissions: The GoJIL encourages submissions addressing general international law and employing methodologies from neighbouring disciplines such as international relations, history, or economics. The Journal also welcomes contributions emanating from specialized branches of international law such as international criminal law, international humanitarian law, and international economic law, in particular if they address issues which are of general relevance. The length of contributions is not restricted. However, we recommend a maximum of 15,000 words. Contributors are requested to insert a short abstract to their submission. Contributions should be saved in MS Word (any version through 7.0) format. Authors should be prepared to supply any cited sources upon request. The full Author Style Sheet is available online at http://gojil.uni-goettingen.de/authorguidelines.pdf. The views expressed in all contributions to the GoJIL are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Board of Editors or the Göttingen Institute of International and European Law. Except where otherwise noted, all contributions are licensed under the Creative Commons Licence Attribution - No Derivative Works 3.0 Germany and protected by German Intellectual Property Law (UrhG). Advisory Board Prof. Dr. KAI AMBOS (University of RAUSCHNING (University of Göttingen), Prof. Göttingen), Prof. Dr. THOMAS BUERGENTHAL Dr. WALTER REESE-SCHÄFER (Göttingen (George Washington University), Prof. Dr. University), Prof. Dr. FRANK SCHORKOPF CHRISTIAN CALLIESS (FU Berlin), Prof. Dr. (Göttingen University) Prof. Dr. BRUNO GEORG NOLTE (HU Berlin/International Law SIMMA (International Court of Justice), Prof. Commission), Prof. Dr. ANDREAS L. PAULUS Dr. PETER-TOBIAS STOLL (Göttingen (Judge at the Federal Constitutional Court, University). University of Göttingen), Prof. Dr. DIETRICH Scientific Advisory Board KATRIN AREND (University of Göttingen), Institute, Heidelberg), SVEN MIßLING HELMUT AUST (Humboldt-University of (University of Göttingen), JÖRN MÜLLER Berlin), CHEN GE (University of Göttingen), (University of Göttingen), KILLIAN O’BRIEN MATTHIAS GOLDMANN (Max Planck Institute, (Walther Schücking Institute, University of Heidelberg), CARSTEN HOPPE (European Kiel), NIELS PETERSEN (Max Planck Institute, University Institute, Florence), STEFAN Bonn), LYDIA LÖHNER (University of KORTE (FU Berlin), THOMAS KLEINLEIN Göttingen), TOBIAS THIENEL (University of (University of Frankfurt/Main), BERNHARD Kiel), IGNAZ STEGMILLER (University of KUSCHNIK (University of Tübingen), Göttingen), MARKUS WAGNER (University of CLEMENS MATTHEIS (University of Miami) Göttingen), NELE MATZ-LÜCK (Max Planck Editorial Board Editors-in-Chief: ANJA DAHLMANN, JÜRGING, GEORG KALINNA, NICOLAS KLEIN, MATTHIAS LIPPOLD, TOBIAS TSCHAPPE CAROLIN KLÜPFEL, ANTONINA KHODZHAEVA , JOHANN RUBEN LEIß, RHIAN MORITZ, JULIA ANTONIA BAUTSCH, FABIAN BISMAYER, ANNE MÖBUS, ANNIKA MALEEN POSCHADEL, DIENELT, JOHANNA DORMANN, NIELS EBLING, JOHANNA ROCH, GEORG SCHAEFER, KAREN SEBASTIAN EHRICHT, JELENA GROßE-BLEY, SCHWABE, PHILIPP SOCHA, LUISA WENDEL, JAHANGIR HASSEL, BENEDIKT HEINRICHS, ELENA-JOSEPHINE WOLTAIRE PETJA IVANOVA, MORTEN JONAS, JOHANNES Native Speaker Board NEELA BADAMI, PRIYA BHATIA, ELIZABETH ANDREW EWING, KAREN KIMKANA, ISABEL CAMPBELL, DEEPALOKE CHATTERJEE, MCCANN, ALEX MURRAY, DANIEL PEAT Vol. 2, No. 3 (2010) Contents Editorial Editorial .................................................................................................... 815 Acknowledgments .................................................................................... 821 Articles Unilateral Interpretation of Security Council Resolutions: UK Practice Alexander Orakhelashvili ......................................................................... 823 The Legal Significance of Global Development Partnerships: European Development Cooperation and its Contribution to the International Law of Development Markus Kaltenborn ................................................................................... 843 Defending the Emergence of the Superior Orders Defense in the Contemporary Context Jessica Liang ............................................................................................ 871 The Post-9/11 Discourse Revisited – The Self-Image of the International Legal Scientific Discipline Ulf Linderfalk ............................................................................................ 893 GoJIL 2 (2010) 3, 813-814 Humanitarian Action – A Scope for the Responsibility to Protect: Part II: Responsibility to Protect – A Legal Device Ready for Use? Marie-José Domestici-Met .......................................................................951 The Rise of Self-Determination Versus the Rise of Democracy Cécile Vandewoude .................................................................................. 981 Current Developments in International Law From Kosovo to Catalunya: Separatism and Integration in Europe Christopher J. Borgen .............................................................................. 997 The two Faces of the Internationalized pouvoir constituant: Independence and Constitution-Making Under External Influence in Kosovo Michael Riegner........................................................................................1035 The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo: Rules or Principles? Volker Roeben ..........................................................................................1063 Recent Developments in Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Peter Rackow & Cornelius Birr ............................................................. 1087 The Millennium Development Goals and Human Rights at 2010 – An Account of the Millennium Summit Outcome Marie von Engelhardt ..............................................................................1129 Vol. 2, No. 3 (2010) Editorial At the end of this decade the General Court of the European Union deliv- ered its judgment Kadi II in which it applied the principles established by the European Court of Justice in its Kadi-judgment. The bottom line: the sanction system still lacks effective judicial protection, the improvements such as establishing a focal point or an ombudsman cannot be regarded pro- viding sufficient legal protection. The General Court is therefore entitled as well as obliged to full judicial review “so long as the re-examination proce- dure operated by the Sanctions Committee clearly fails to offer guarantees of effective judicial protection”1. At the end of its judgment the General Court raised an important question: “It might even be asked whether – given that now nearly 10 years have passed since the applicant‟s funds were originally frozen – it is not now time to call into question the finding of this Court […] according to which the freezing of funds is a temporary precautionary measure which, unlike con- fiscation, does not affect the very substance of the right of the persons con- cerned to property in their financial assets but only the use thereof.”2 Nearly 10 years have now passed since the funds of Mr Kadi and others were fro- zen – one could raise the question whether the Court‟s statement can be in- terpreted as a call for a return to normality, to a reassessment of the taken measures. At least, the sanctions as implemented in States have been sub- jected to judicial review and partly have been challenged successfully. Cur- rently we are witnessing many legal proceedings focusing on legal questions about the terror-lists and its implementation: the Kadi-Litigation before the Courts of the European Union, the pending proceedings in Nada v Switzer- land as well as Abdelrazik v The Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Attor- ney General of Canada
Recommended publications
  • PARTEI DIE FRIESEN V. GERMANY

    PARTEI DIE FRIESEN V. GERMANY

    FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PARTEI DIE FRIESEN v. GERMANY (Application no. 65480/10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 28 January 2016 FINAL 28/04/2016 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. PARTEI DIE FRIESEN v. GERMANY JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Partei Die Friesen v. Germany, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Ganna Yudkivska, President, Angelika Nußberger, André Potocki, Faris Vehabović, Síofra O’Leary, Carlo Ranzoni, Mārtiņš Mits, judges, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 5 January 2016, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 65480/10) against the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by the political party “Partei Die Friesen” (“the applicant party”), on 1 November 2010. 2. The applicant party was represented by Mr Wilhelm Bosse, a lawyer practising in Osnabrück. The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr H. J. Behrens, of the Federal Ministry of Justice. 3. The applicant party alleged, in particular, that it was discriminated against by the 5% threshold applied at the parliamentary elections in the Land of Lower Saxony. 4. On 15 May 2013 the application was communicated to the Government. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5. The applicant party was founded in 2007 and is based in Aurich. It claims to represent the interests of the Frisian minority in Germany but limits its political activities to the Land of Lower Saxony (Niedersachsen) where the East Frisians traditionally settle.
  • Germany 2016

    Germany 2016

    Germany 2016 Including summaries in English, French and German 1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers Directorate D — Equality Unit JUST/D1 European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Country report Non-discrimination Germany Matthias Mahlmann Reporting period 1 January 2015 – 31 December 2015 Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers 2016 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 PDF ISBN 978-92-79-47006-6 doi:10.2838/03980 DS-04-16-674-3A-N © European Union, 2016 Country report - Non-discrimination – Germany – 2016 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 6 RESUME ............................................................................................................ 13 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ........................................................................................ 21 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................
  • Elections European Parliament

    Elections European Parliament

    ELECTIONS EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 22-25 May 2014 efficiencyEnergy Unity in Diversity politicalYour party Biodiversity Reduction of public deficits Social justice Diversity Solidarity Sustainable cohesionand Cooperation growth Assembly of Regions Diversity in and Peoples farming/ Regions fishing Tackling Autonomy tax fraud Human Renewable Self- Rights Government Energy Linguistic determinationSelf- Support equality Recognition SME Languagesof all Transparency Internal enlargement Subsidiarity Independence Sustainable Democracy Local supply development Peace of food Energy Diversity Transparent sovereignty of energy Energy sources markets disciplineFiscal Equality Stateless (supportnations for) Europe of the Peoples your European Political partyEFA www.e-f-a.org It’s time for self-determination Our manifesto very much reflects this 6. Developing sustainable fisheries and for all the peoples of Europe diversity, and while respecting our differ- aquaculture; ences, works to build on the overarching 7. Facing the challenges to our languag- values and aspirations that we share es and cultures and working towards Welcome to the European Free Alliance whelming support of their people, now in common. Therefore, the manifesto linguistic equality. European election Manifesto for 2014. have the opportunity to decide on their focuses on these shared values of our future and whether they want to become member parties with seven general pol- It is an honour to be your EFA president We live in historic times. Across Europe free, independent states. icy proposals: at such a momentous time for all of ancient nations, regions, and peoples, 1. The right to self-determination, the our parties. I warmly commend this EFA currently under the jurisdiction of var- In May many of our EFA parties are look- internal enlargement, and EU recog- Manifesto to you as we launch our cam- ious states, are increasingly calling for ing forward to success in the European nition of this process; paigns for the 2014 European elections, either enhanced autonomy or outright Parliament elections.
  • Sijstermans2019.Pdf (3.020Mb)

    Sijstermans2019.Pdf (3.020Mb)

    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. 1 Political Party Learning in the European Free Alliance: Inspiration and Information in the (Trans)Nationalist Family Judith Sijstermans PhD in Politics University of Edinburgh 2019 2 Declaration I declare that this thesis was composed by myself, Judith Sijstermans, and that the work contained herein is my own except where explicitly stated otherwise in the text. I declare that this work has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Judith Sijstermans 26 February 2019 Edinburgh, Scotland 3 Table of Contents Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………….6 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………......7 Lay Summary……………………………………………………………………….9 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….11
  • Waddenland Outstanding History, Landscapehistory, and Cultural of Heritage the Sea Wadden Region Edited by Linde Egberts and Meindert Schroor

    Waddenland Outstanding History, Landscapehistory, and Cultural of Heritage the Sea Wadden Region Edited by Linde Egberts and Meindert Schroor

    LANDSCAPE AND HERITAGE STUDIES Egberts & Schroor (eds) Waddenland Outstanding Edited by Linde Egberts and Meindert Schroor Waddenland Outstanding History, Landscape and Cultural Heritage of the Wadden Sea Region Waddenland Outstanding Landscape and Heritage Studies Landscape and Heritage Studies (LHS) is an English-language series about the history, heritage and transformation of the natural and cultural landscape and the built environment. The series aims at the promotion of new directions as well as the rediscovery and exploration of lost tracks in landscape and heritage research. Both theoretically oriented approaches and detailed empirical studies play an important part in the realization of this objective. The series explicitly focuses on: – the interactions between physical and material aspects of landscapes and landscape experiences, meanings and representations; – perspectives on the temporality and dynamic of landscape that go beyond traditional concepts of time, dating and chronology; – the urban-rural nexus in the context of historical and present-day transformations of the landscape and the built environment; – multidisciplinary, integrative and comparative approaches from geography, spatial, social and natural sciences, history, archaeology and cultural sciences in order to understand the development of human-nature interactions through time and to study the natural, cultural and social values of places and landscapes; – the conceptualization and musealization of landscape as heritage and the role of ‘heritagescapes’ in the construction and reproduction of memories and identities; – the role of heritage practices in the transmission, design and transformation of (hidden) landscapes and the built environment, both past and present; – the appropriation of and engagement with sites, places, destinations, landscapes, monuments and buildings, and their representation and meaning in distinct cultural contexts.
  • Overview: the Diversity and Complexity of Separatist Movements in Europe Alan B. Anderson* University of Saskatchewan

    Overview: the Diversity and Complexity of Separatist Movements in Europe Alan B. Anderson* University of Saskatchewan

    Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe Vol 17, No 3, 2018, 4-44. Copyright © ECMI 2018 This article is located at: http://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/downloads/publications/JEMIE/201 8/Anderson_intro.pdf Overview: the Diversity and Complexity of Separatist Movements in Europe Alan B. Anderson* University of Saskatchewan Of 42 independent countries in Europe (excluding mini-states, dependencies, and counting the four states together comprising the United Kingdom as a single country), almost all contain territorial-based ethnic minorities which have been, continue to be, or may potentially be engaged in separatist movements.1 While ‘separatism’ is often equated with full political secession, separatist movements – broadly defined – may actually range from secession to autonomy.2 Secessionist movements seek complete independence from an existing country. They may include militant independence movements, involving violence initiated by secessionists; violent state repression of secessionism; or non-violent democratic secessionism. Autonomist movements aim at achieving, strengthening, or maintaining political autonomy within an existing country, short of independence. Such movements may be working toward the achievement of autonomy; or may aim at increasing or strengthening existing autonomy; whereas some autonomous regions may simply be content with existing autonomy (the status quo). Several relatively newly independent countries have recently acquired their independence * Alan B. Anderson is Professor Emeritus of Sociology and a former chair of the International Studies Program at the University of Saskatchewan (Canada). Correspondence details: e-mail: [email protected]. JEMIE Vol 17, No 3, 2018 due to the dissolution of previous federations, and indeed some historic countries with a strong nationalistic identity wish to break away from existing federations.
  • From Kosovo to Catalonia: Separatism and Integration in Europe

    From Kosovo to Catalonia: Separatism and Integration in Europe

    St. John's University School of Law St. John's Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications 2010 From Kosovo to Catalonia: Separatism and Integration in Europe Christopher J. Borgen St. John's University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, European Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Goettingen Journal of International Law 2 (2010) 3, 997-1033 From Kosovo to Catalonia: Separatism and Integration in Europe Christopher J. Borgen* Table of Contents Abstract .............................................. 999 A. Introduction: A Tale of Two Opinions.. ................. 999 B. Kosovo and the Law of Self Determination......... ...... 1001 I. Kosovo's Declaration. ............................. 1001 II. International Law and Self-Determination ............... 1003 III. The ICJ and the Kosovo Advisory Opinion .............. 1006 IV. Reactions and Implications ..................... ..... 1008 C. Nationalism and the EU: Blood, Soil, and Globalization ............. 1009 I. Nations and States ................................ 1009 II. Many Nationalities in One Nation: Spain.......... ...... 1011 1. The Basque Country ............................ 1013 2. Catalonia .............................. ...... 1016 III. Kosovo (as Seen from Spain) and the Limits of the ICJ.............1018 * Professor of Law and Associate Dean for International Studies at St. John's University School of Law in New York City. This essay benefited from comments and suggestions from Lori Outzs Borgen, Peggy McGuinness, and Brad Roth.
  • Available Here

    Available Here

    Ostfriesen Genealogical Society of America OGSA PO Box 50919 Mendota, MN 55150 651-269-3580 www.ogsa.us OGSA NEWSLETTER INDEX 1998-2016 Article Title Issue 1717 Flood Map 2005, Issue 1 1757 Kopfschatzungsregister 2010, Issue 3 1806 Maps 2006, Issue 2 1848 Plattdüütsch Children’s Story 2004, Issue 3 1851 / 1852 Kaiser’s (Jann) 1851 Diary, 1852 Letter & Genealogy 2009, Issue 1 1853 Auction 2008, Issue 4 18th Century Church & Marriage Orders 2007, Issue 1 1930 US Federal Census 2002, Issue 2 1940 US Federal Census 2012, issue 2 2012 Conference 2011, Issue 4 2012 Conference Info. 2012, Issue 4 30 Years War 1999 Issue 4 30 Years War I 2006, Issue 3 30 Years War II 2006, Issue 4 30 Years War III 2007, Issue 1 7 Dorfstrasse, Groothusen 2012, Issue 3 A Journey of 76 Days, The Franzen Family 2014, Issue 3 Abbreviations 2005, Issue 2 About Rich Polder Farmers and Poor Moorfolk, by Pastor Hoogstraat 2003, Issue 4 Aerolus Diary 2011, Issue 1 Aida Bella 2008, Issue 3 All-Year Celebration, Ostfriesen Style 2011, Issue 2 American Odyssey 2010, Issue 1 Ammermann Farm 1999, Issue 4 Amt Aurich, Part II 2013, Issue 1 Amt Aurich, Part III 2013, Issue 2 Amt Esens III 2015, Issue 1 Amt Esens, Part I 2014, Issue 3 Amt Esens, Part II 2014, Issue 4 Amt Esens, Part III 2015, Issue 1 Amt Friedeburg 2014, Issue 1 Amt Friedeburg, Part II 2014, Issue 2 Amt Wittmund III 2016, Issue 2 Amtsblatt for Ostfriesland 2012, Issue 4 Ancestral Numbering System 2003, Issue 4 Ancestral Numbering Systems 2008, Issue 2 And Once They Got Here… 2010, Issue 1 Andrea Hits Ostfriesland
  • Jürgen Trittin (BÜNDNIS 90/ (Drucksachen 16/11247, 16/11971)

    Jürgen Trittin (BÜNDNIS 90/ (Drucksachen 16/11247, 16/11971)

    Plenarprotokoll 16/214 Deutscher Bundestag Stenografischer Bericht 214. Sitzung Berlin, Donnerstag, den 26. März 2009 Inhalt: Glückwünsche zum Geburtstag der Abgeord- Abrüstung und für gemeinsame Sicher- neten Uwe Beckmeyer, Dr. Max Stadler und heit einleiten Wilhelm Josef Sebastian . 23117 A (Drucksache 16/12322) . 23120 B Erweiterung und Abwicklung der Tagesord- e) Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. Rainer nung . 23117 B Stinner, Jens Ackermann, Dr. Karl Addicks, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Absetzung des Tagesordnungspunktes 9. 23119 B Fraktion der FDP: 60 Jahre NATO – Nachträgliche Ausschussüberweisungen . 23119 B Deutschland muss sich in Diskussion über die Zukunft der NATO konstruk- tiv einbringen Tagesordnungspunkt 3: (Drucksache 16/12433) . 23120 B a) Abgabe einer Regierungserklärung durch Dr. Angela Merkel, Bundeskanzlerin . 23120 C die Bundeskanzlerin: zum NATO-Gipfel 23120 A Dr. Guido Westerwelle (FDP) . 23125 C b) Beschlussempfehlung und Bericht des Walter Kolbow (SPD) . 23127 A Auswärtigen Ausschusses zu dem Antrag der Abgeordneten Paul Schäfer (Köln), Oskar Lafontaine (DIE LINKE) . 23128 C Wolfgang Gehrcke, Monika Knoche, wei- terer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion DIE Dr. Peter Ramsauer (CDU/CSU) . 23130 C LINKE: Keine NATO-Erweiterung – Si- Heike Hänsel (DIE LINKE) . 23131 B cherheit und Stabilität mit und nicht ge- gen Russland Jürgen Trittin (BÜNDNIS 90/ (Drucksachen 16/11247, 16/11971) . 23120 A DIE GRÜNEN) . 23133 B c) Antrag der Abgeordneten Jürgen Trittin, Gert Weisskirchen (Wiesloch) (SPD) . 23135 A Winfried Nachtwei, Kerstin Müller Dr. Rainer Stinner (FDP) . 23136 B (Köln), weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN: Eckart von Klaeden (CDU/CSU) . 23136 D Überprüfung und Korrektur der Stra- tegie beim Afghanistanengagement vor Wolfgang Gehrcke (DIE LINKE) .
  • Annual Report 2016 of the European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe”

    Annual Report 2016 of the European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe”

    ANNUAL REPORT European Court of Human Rights 2016 PROVISIONAL VERSION ANNUAL REPORT European Court of Human Rights 2016 PROVISIONAL VERSION English edition © Council of Europe – European Court of Human Rights, 2017 ISBN 978-92-871-9862-4 Anyone wishing to reproduce and/or translate all or part of this report in print, online or in any other format should contact [email protected] for further instructions When citing this report, please acknowledge the source “Annual Report 2016 of the European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe” This report is available to download at www.echr.coe.int (The Court/Annual Reports) For publication updates please follow the Court’s Twitter account at twitter.com/echrpublication © Photos: Council of Europe Layout and cover design: Publications Unit, ECHR Table of Contents FOREWORD 7 THE COURT IN 2016 11 SPEECHES 19 Guido Raimondi 19 Andrzej Rzepliński 26 OVERVIEW OF THE COURT’S CASE-LAW 35 Jurisdiction and admissibility 39 “Core” rights 42 Procedural rights 70 Other rights and freedoms 101 Other Convention provisions 164 BRINGING THE CONVENTION HOME 171 Dissemination of the Court’s case-law 172 Training of legal professionals 177 General outreach 178 Appendix 180 JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES 183 Grand Chamber 183 Sections 184 Single-judge formation 184 Composition of the Court 185 Composition of the Sections 187 The Plenary Court 190 STATISTICS 193 Events (2015-16) 193 Pending cases at 31 December 2016 (by respondent States) 194 Pending cases at 31 December 2016 (main respondent States) 195 Court’s workload
  • The Internationalism of the EFA - 5 International Issues Are Not Part of the Core World

    The Internationalism of the EFA - 5 International Issues Are Not Part of the Core World

    Introduction 04 Chronology of the EFA 28 The leadership of EFA 34 The MEPs of the EFA 36 The General Assemblies of the EFA 48 EFA parties 50 Founding texts of EFA 54 Archives material 60 This publication is financed with the support of the European Parliament (EP). The EP is not responsible for any use made of the content of this publication. Documents 64 European Union (Maastricht Treaty, 1992). “the European federal authority has particular This change involves the renaming of the EFA responsibility for helping less favoured regions as the “Democratic Party of the Peoples of to achieve equality”. Finally, let’s mention that Europe – European Free Alliance” (DPPE-EFA). the EFA develops a largely post-materialist and Introduction But it is only in 2004 that the EFA becomes a green3 approach from its creation: “the EFA genuine European party, recognised as such by advocates a new life-style that attaches more the European Parliament. From 2004 therefore, importance to well-being and health than to there is a formal distinction between the EFA as production and technical progress not aimed group in the European Parliament (the MEPs at satisfying genuine welfare needs. The EFA and their staff) and the EFA as political party therefore wants to ensure that the economy, (with its own staff and agenda, and its location living conditions and social intercourse outside the European parliament). The main preserve their vital links with man and nature”. motor and raison d’être of the party, though, remains the MEPs until now1. From the 1990s, the EFA makes explicit those core ideological values in the statutes of the If the EFA is one of the smallest European party, and notably in its article 1 (1999) or political parties, it has a very clear ideological 3 (2005).
  • Can Electoral Inequalities Be Legally Justified? Analysis of Belgian, British and German Law Through the European Court of Human Rights Case Law*

    Can Electoral Inequalities Be Legally Justified? Analysis of Belgian, British and German Law Through the European Court of Human Rights Case Law*

    CAN ELECTORAL INEQUALITIES BE LEGALLY JUSTIFIED? ANALYSIS OF BELGIAN, BRITISH AND GERMAN LAW THROUGH THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE LAW* FRÉDÉRIC BOUHON** “By equality of suffrage, is meant equality of effect and value, as between the suffrage of one man and the suffrage of another.” Jeremy BENTHAM1 THE election is an instrument which enables a community to choose one or several persons whom it entrusts with a political mandate. * This article is based on a thesis prepared under the direction of Pr. Chr. Behrendt, which was presented on the 27th of March 2014 for a PhD de- gree at the University of Liège (Belgium) and later received an award from the European Group of Public Law (Thesis Prize 2015) for which the au- thor would like to offer sincere thanks. The original work was published in French (Droit électoral et principe d’égalité. L’élection des assemblées lé- gislatives nationales en droits allemand, belge et britannique, Brussels, Bruylant, 2014, 1009 pages). A summarising article written in French about this study can be found in: Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé (R.I.D.C.), 2015, 439-458. ** Doctor of Laws and lecturer (chargé de cours) at the University of Liège. The author can be contacted at the following email address: [email protected] 1 J. BENTHAM, Radical Reform Bill, [1819], in: J. BOWRING (dir.), The work of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 3, Edinburgh, William Tait, 1843, Prelimi- nary explanations. ERPL/REDP, vol. 28, no 3, autumn/automne 2016 840 F. Bouhon When used at the scale of a democratic state, the election aims at reducing millions of different personal wills into a unique decision2.