DOCSLIB.ORG

Field Binder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Abandoned Mine Drainage Stream Monitoring FIELD BINDER Based on Conference Field Binder from the proceedings of the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Conference - June 12, 2004 Indiana, PA; Updated November 2, 2011 (v2) and March 7, 2021 (v3) CONTENTS SECTION 1: FIELD DATA COLLECTION FORMS A: Stream Quality and Quantity Field Sampling Datasheets (PA DEP BWS & WVSOS) B: Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats Classification Chart (Cowardin et al.) C: General Passive Treatment System O&M Inspection Form and Instructions (Datashed.org) D: Aquatic Connectivity Stream Crossing Survey Data Form (NAACC) SECTION 2: CHEMISTRY Chemistry Monitoring Protocols SECTION 3: FLOW Measure and Calculate Flows: Small & Large Streams/Discharges and Weirs SECTION 4: HABITAT VISUAL ASSESSMENT A: Stream Visual Assessment Protocol (USDA NWCC Technical Note 99-1) B: Stream Crossing for Aquatic Passability Assessments in Non-tidal Stream and Rivers (NAACC) SECTION 5: MACROINVERTEBRATES A: Macroinvertebrate Sampling Protocols B: Macroinvertebrate Identification Keys SECTION 6: RESOURCES Calculate Your Ecological Footprint Macroinvertebrate Links (Online Keys for Identification, Picture Sources, Books & Equipment Suppliers) Section 1A: Stream Quality & Quantity Field Sampling Datasheets (Updated 1/2021) Page 1 of 4 Station Information (adapted from PA DEP Bureau of Water Standards Form 3800-FM-WSFR0086 Rev. 12/2008) Date-Time-Initials: - - Station ID: ___ Location (ex. Latitude/Longitude, directions, landmarks...): ___ ___ County: Municipality: Topo Quad: __ Watershed (HUC8): Stream (HUC12): Tributary (HUC14): ___ Waterbody Class*: ____ Ch. 93 Use¥: Weather - Current: _ - Past Week: ____________ *Riverine, Lacustrine, Palustrine or Non-classified manmade ¥Warm Water Fish, Trout Stock Fish, Cold Water Fish, Migratory Fish, High Quality, or Exceptional Value. Reminder to take (3) photos (of site, upstream & downstream with people for scale) & sketch site (in-stream attributes like riffles, fallen trees, pools, etc.) Physical Conditions (circle one or more): (adapted from WV SOS Level 1 Survey 18373 Rev. 11/2009 and EPA Rapid Bioassessment 841-B-99-002) Water Clarity: clear, murky, milky, muddy, other Water Color: none, brown, black, green, gray /white, orange/red Streambed Color: brown, black, green, white/gray, orange/red Surface Foam/Oil: none, slight, moderate, high Water Odor: none, fishy, musky, sewage, chemical, rotten egg Algae Abundance: none, scattered, moderate, heavy Algae Growth Habit: even coating, hairy, matted, floating Algae Color: light green, dark green, brown, other Field Chemistry Result/Unit Result/Unit Describe Type Result/Unit Temperature: Total Alkalinity: Metals: Dissolved Oxygen: Conductivity: Nutrients: pH: Turbidity: Redox (ORP): Additional tests (describe and record results): Flow Calculation (adapted from WV SOS Level one Survey Datasheet 18373 Rev. 11/2009) Channel Width/Pipe Diameter(ft): Method Used (circle one): flow meter, float, pipe, velocity head rod (VHR) VHR Values Chart Tape distance (ft) Depth (ft) X Velocity (ft/sec) or Float (sec) or VHR (Rise-in.) = Discharge (CFS) Rise Velocity Rise Velocity 1 ¼” 1.2 f/s 3 ¼” 4.2 f/s 2 ½” 1.6 f/s 3 ½” 4.3 f/s 3 ¾” 2.0 f/s 3 ¾” 4.5 f/s 4 1” 2.3 f/s 4” 4.6 f/s 5 1 ¼” 2.6 f/s 4 ¼” 4.8 f/s 6 1 ½” 2.8 f/s 4 ½” 4.9 f/s 7 1 ¾” 3.1 f/s 4 ¾” 5.0 f/s 8 2” 3.3 f/s 5” 5.2 f/s 9 2 ¼” 3.5 f/s 5 ¼” 5.3 f/s 10 2 ½” 3.7 f/s 5 ½” 5.4 f/s 2 ¾” 3.8 f/s 5 ¾” 5.5 f/s Totals/Averages Basic Calculation: Discharge (CFS)= Width (ft) x Depth(ft) x Velocity (ft/sec.) 3” 4.0 f/s 6” 5.7 f/s If you use the “float method” record your float distance here _____ (ft) and multiply by the time (recorded above) to get velocity. If you use the “VHR method” record the rise in inches and select velocity in the chart to the right. 1 CFS = 448.83 gpm = 1.858 MGD Section 1A: Stream Quality & Quantity Field Sampling Datasheets (Updated 1/2021) Page 2 of 4 Habitat Visual Assessment (adapted from PA DEP BWS Form 3800-FM-WSFR0402 Rev. 10/2008 and EPA Rapid Bioassessment 841-B-99-002) Particle Size Descriptors: Silt (slick feel), Sand (grainy feel), Gravel ( > pea), Cobble ( > tennis ball), Boulder ( > basketball), and Bedrock ( > car). Habitat Parameter Category Part 1 Optimal Suboptimal Marginal Poor 1. Instream Cover Greater than 50% mix of 30-50% mix of boulder, 10-30% mix of boulder, Less than 10% mix of (Fish) boulder, cobble, sub-merged cobble, or other stable habitat; cobble, or other stable boulder, cobble, or other logs, undercut banks, or other adequate habitat. habitat; habitat avail- stable habitat; lack of stable habitat. ability less than habitat is obvious. desirable. SCORE ______ 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2. Epifaunal Well developed riffle and run, Riffle is as wide as stream but Run area may be lacking; Riffles or run virtually Substrate riffle is as wide as stream and length is less than two times riffle not as wide as nonexistent; large length extends two times the width; abundance of cobble; stream and its length is boulders and bedrock width of stream; abundance of boulders and gravel common. less than two times the prevalent; cobble lacking. cobble. stream width; gravel or large boulders and bed- rock prevalent; some cobble present. SCORE ______ 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 3. Embeddedness Gravel, cobble, and boulder Gravel, cobble, and boulder Gravel, cobble, and Gravel, cobble, and particles are 0-25% surrounded particles are 25-50% boulder particles are 50- boulder particles are more by fine sediment (silt=slick or surrounded by fine sediment. 75% surrounded by fine than 75% surrounded by sand=grainy feel). sediment. fine sediment. SCORE ______ 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 4. Velocity/Depth All four velocity/depth Only 3 of the 4 regimes Only 2 of the 4 habitat Dominated by 1 Regimes regimes present (slow-deep, present (if fast-shallow is regimes present (if fast- velocity/depth regime slow-shallow, fast-deep, fast- missing, score lower than if shallow or slow-shallow (usually slow-deep). shallow). missing other regimes). are missing, score lower than if missing other regimes). SCORE ______ 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 5. Channel No channelization or dredging Some channelization present, New embankments Banks shored gabion or Alteration present. usually in areas of bridge present on both banks; cement; over 80% of the abutments; evidence of past and 40-80% of stream stream reach channelized channelization, i.e., dredging, reach channelized and and disrupted. (greater than past 20 yr) may disrupted. be present, but recent channelization is not present. SCORE ______ 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 6. Sediment Little or no enlargement of Some new increase in bar Moderate deposition of Heavy deposits of fine Deposition islands or point bars and less formation, mostly from coarse new gravel, coarse sand material, increased bar than 5% of the bottom gravel; 5-30% of the bottom on old and new bars; 30- development; more than affected by sediment affected; slight deposition in 50% of the bottom 50% of the bottom deposition. pools. affected; sediment changing frequently; pools deposits at obstruction, almost absent due to constriction, and bends; substantial sediment moderate deposition of deposition. pools prevalent. SCORE ______ 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Total Part 1 _____ Habitat Parameter Category Section 1A: Stream Quality & Quantity Field Sampling Datasheets (Updated 1/2021) Page 3 of 4 Part 2 Optimal Suboptimal Marginal Poor 7. Frequency of Occurrence of riffles relatively Occurrence of riffles Occasional riffle or bend; Generally all flat water or Riffles frequent; distance between infrequent; distance between bottom contours provide shallow riffles; poor riffles divided by the width of riffles divided by the width of some habitat; distance habitat; distance between the stream equals 5 to 7; the stream equals 7 to 15. between riffles divided riffles divided by the variety of habitat. by the width of stream is width of the stream is between 15 to 25. between ratio >25. SCORE ______ 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8. Channel Flow Water reaches base of both Water fills > 75% of the Water fills 25-75% of the Very little water in Status lower banks and minimal available channel; or <25% of available channel and/or channel and mostly amount of channel substrate is channel substrate is exposed. riffle substrates are present as standing pools. exposed. mostly exposed. SCORE ______ 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9. Condition of Banks stable; no evidence of Moderately stable; infrequent, Moderately unstable; up Unstable; many eroded Banks erosion or bank failure. small areas of erosion mostly to 60% of banks in reach areas; “raw” areas healed over. have areas of erosion. frequent along straight sections and bends; on side slopes,60-100% of bank has erosional scars. SCORE ______ 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 10. Bank More than 90% of the 70-90% of the stream-bank 50-70% of the stream- Less than 50% of the Vegetative streambank surface covered by surface covered by vegetation.
Recommended publications
  • Jazzletter P-Q Ocrober 1986 P 5Jno;..1O

    Jazzletter P-Q Ocrober 1986 P 5Jno;..1O

    Jazzletter P-Q ocrober 1986 P 5jNo;..1o . u-1'!-an J.R. Davis,.Bill Davis, Rusty Dedrick, Buddy DeFranco, Blair The Readers . Deiermann, Rene de Knight,‘ Ron Della Chiesa (WGBH), As of August 25, I986, the JazzIetrer’s readers were: Louise Dennys, Joe Derise, Vince Dellosa, Roger DeShon, Michael Abene, John Abbott, Mariano F. Accardi, Harlan John Dever, Harvey Diamond, Samuel H. Dibert’, Richard Adamcik, Keith Albano, Howard Alden, Eleanore Aldrich, DiCarlo, Gene DiNovi, Victor DiNovi, Chuck Domanico, Jeff Alexander, Steve Allen, Vernon Alley, Alternate and Arthur Domaschenz, Mr. and Mrs. Steve Donahue, William E. Independent Study Program, Bill Angel, Alfred Appel J r, Ted Donoghue, Bob Dorough, Ed Dougherty, Hermie Dressel, Len Arenson, Bruce R. Armstrong, Jim Armstrong, Tex Arnold, Dresslar, Kenny Drew, Ray Drummond, R.H. Duffield, Lloyd Kenny Ascher, George Avakian, Heman B. Averill, L. Dulbecco, Larry Dunlap, Marilyn Dunlap, Brian Duran, Jean Bach, Bob Bain, Charles Baker (Kent State University Eddie Duran, Mike Dutton (KCBX), ' School of Music), Bill Ballentine, Whitney Balliett, Julius Wendell Echols, Harry (Sweets) Edison,Jim_Eigo, Rachel Banas, Jim Barker, Robert H. Barnes, Charlie Barnet, Shira Elkind-Tourre, Jack Elliott, Herb Ellis, Jim Ellison, Jack r Barnett, Jeff Barr, E.M. Barto Jr, Randolph Bean, Jack Ellsworth (WLIM), Matt Elmore (KCBX FM), Gene Elzy Beckerman, Bruce B. Bee, Lori Bell, Malcolm Bell Jr, Carroll J . (WJR), Ralph Enriquez, Dewey Emey, Ricardo Estaban, Ray Bellis MD, Mr and Mrs Mike Benedict, Myron Bennett, Dick Eubanks (Capital University Conservatory of Music), Gil Bentley, Stephen C. Berens MD, Alan Bergman, James L. Evans, Prof Tom Everett (Harvard University), Berkowitz, Sheldon L.
  • And Technology Corp

    And Technology Corp

    AND TECHNOLOGY CORP. Community Relations Plan for the North Penn Area 6 Superfund Site Lansdale, Pennsylvania December 1993 Submitted by V WastB& e Scienc Technologd ean y Corp. AR500002 Contents 1.0 Overview of Plan ........................................... 1 0 Sit2. e Description ............................................3 3.0 Site Background Information ................................... 6 3.1 Previous Site Operations ................................. 6 2 Sit3. e Regulatory History ................................2 .1 3.3 Current and Upcoming Regulatory Activities ................. 12 4.0 Community Profile ........................................ 14 5.0 History and Analysis of Community Concerns .................... 15 6.0 Summary of Key Concerns .................................... 17 6.1 Drinking Water Quality ................................7 .1 2 Healt6. h Effects .......................................8 .1 6.3 Economic Effects ...................................... 18 6.4 Reliable Sources of Information ........................... 19 7.0 Community Relations Program ............................... 20 7.1 Objectives ........................................... 20 7.2 Activities ........................................... 20 Table . Table 1 Implementation Schedule ............................... 22 Figure Figur eSit1 p ............................................. eMa .5 TC-1 HR500003 Contents (Continued) Appendices Appendi xA Lis Contactf to s ................................l .A- Appendix B Locations of Information Repository
  • Hp "Ex Ip Hawaiian Star. 9

    Hp "Ex Ip Hawaiian Star. 9

    ""-- 'It 4ff. 1 1 I'lHlliHItllll HP "EX HIIIMSI , J gjtfP HVItIM AI'lllKNIHIN J I 1 IPHi .1 UliJriH A Ml I.VI 11 fflift I'Villl'r ttSII.lt. HAWAIIAN STAR. J IN AIIV.ISOIU J 9 VOL ill. HONOLULU, HAWAIIAN ISLANDS. WEDNESDAY EVENING, JUNE 13. 1894 NO 69. 3IISS L1D1K 31. WHST. A FAIR HESSIAN. The Hawaiian Star. OFFICIAL DIRECTORY. BISHOP & CO., Do You Use AN OBEDIENT BOY. In WW. l'rlnr, . AIU Mny Smup It llinprr.. Agent to 7'tUr Atknowltdgtmcnts. tty A I'nlhi-r'- Wlw I'lnii I ,.r II, ttlnz IllOInn. Any of the if ltil.l.l. ey llilfk. I'rlnetwi lUmm' 1. ' PUBLISHED EVERY AFTERNOON BANKERS. Olllce: Factory. Alix of to li married "Henry, my Imy," enlil kind father, Honolulu Carriage Kauai. tlnio In tho coming nutntiin to tho tl. SUNDAY Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands. Following .oiiio laying hi. Imnri on the .houldrr of the only EXCEPT Bere-tiinl- .i IIaiiiui-o- Him-fd- vnorisu.y.iii Hesidence: coiner Punchbowl and Our Mil. O. II. will re- crnrowlti! ni sou who hwl htt--n pride ot his 11V THE HAWAIIAN STAR NEWSPA- rut: uormixituxT of mi Innu the DRAW EXCHANOE ON streets. UOl'Om turn from the Garden Island in Articles ? nnd hlf tho llltf, "hove you nt )et hat any thmiKlit ol PER ASSOCIATION, Ltd. court of l'.nropn mnrrlairet" TIIH HAWAIIAN lSt.AXD.1 SAN about two week. We trust our - THE BANK OF CALIFORNIA, FRANCIS If you do, call on us nrt- Iwnmlhi; with ThejimiiK tnan thoughtfully lifted hit - EDITOR.
  • Temple University Wrti-Fm

    Temple University Wrti-Fm

    TEMPLE UNIVERSITY WRTI-FM Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, and Independent Auditor’s Report TEMPLE UNIVERSITY WRTI-FM Table of Contents Page Summary of Combined Statements of Activities, Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 Operating Revenues Without Donor Restrictions by Source i Operating Expenses by Function and Natural Expense Type ii Independent Auditor's Report 1 Financial Statements, as of and for the Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018: Statements of Financial Position, June 30, 2019 and 2018 3 Statement of Activities, Year Ended June 30, 2019 4 Statement of Activities, Year Ended June 30, 2018 5 Statement of Cash Flows, Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 6 Notes to Financial Statements 7 TEMPLE UNIVERSITY WRTI-FM Revenues Without Donor Restrictions by Source i TEMPLE UNIVERSITY WRTI-FM Operating Expenses by Function and Natural Expense Type ii This Page is Intentionally Blank INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT The Board of Directors Temple University Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Temple University WRTI-FM (WRTI- FM), which comprise the statements of financial position as of June 30, 2019 and 2018, and the related statements of activities and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the financial statements. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
  • FM Subcarrier Corridor Assessment for the Intelligent Transportation System

    FM Subcarrier Corridor Assessment for the Intelligent Transportation System

    NTIA Report 97-335 FM Subcarrier Corridor Assessment for the Intelligent Transportation System Robert O. DeBolt Nicholas DeMinco U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Mickey Kantor, Secretary Larry Irving, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information January 1997 PREFACE The propagation studies and analysis described in this report were sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Virginia. The guidance and advice provided by J. Arnold of FHWA are gratefully acknowledged. iii CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background.......................................................................................................................1 1.2 Objective...........................................................................................................................2 1.3 Study Tasks.......................................................................................................................3 1.4 Study Approach................................................................................................................3 1.5 FM Subcarrier Systems.....................................................................................................4 2. ANALYSIS OF CORRIDOR 1 - Interstate 95 from Richmond, Virginia, to Portland, Maine......................................................................................................................5 3.
  • Tlu Lictutstilnatttatt ^ W T? Fmmrlrrl 1885

    Tlu Lictutstilnatttatt ^ W T? Fmmrlrrl 1885

    tlu lictutstilnatttatt ^ W T? fmmrlrrl 1885 ■•■''' lily . , , Vol. \CIX.\o.6l I'llll AHHPHIA.July I. 1983 Minority admissions fall in larger Class of 1987 Officials laud geographic diversity B> I -At KfN ( (II I MAN the) are pleased with the results ol a \ target class ol 1987 contains dtive 10 make the student bod) more liginificantl) fewei minority geographicall) diverse, citing a students but the group is the Univer- decrease in the numbet ol students sity's most geographicall) diverse from Ihe Northeast in the c lass ol class ever. 198". A- ol late May, 239 minority ot the 4191 students who were at -indents had indicated the) will cepted to the new freshman class. matriculate at the i niversit) in the 2178 indicated b) late \lav that the) fall as members ol the new will matricualte, a 4" percent yield. freshman class, a drop ol almost 5 Provost l hi'ina- Ehrlich said that percent from last year's figure of increasing geographic diversit) i- 251. one ol the I Diversity's top goal-. Acceptances from t hicano and "I'm ver) pleased particularl) in Asian students increased this vear, terms of following out goal of DP Steven Siege bin the number of Hacks and geographic diversit) while maintain- I xuhcranl tans tearing down the franklin Held goalpost! after IRC Quakers" 23-2 victor) over Harvard latino- dropped sharply. Hie new ing academic quality," he said. "The freshman class will have 113 black indicator- look veiv good." -indents, compared wilh 133 last Stetson -.ml the size ol the i lass veat a decline ol almost 16 per ol 1987 will not be finalized until cent tin- month, when adjustments are Champions But Vlmissions Dean I ee Stetson made I'm students who decide 10 Bl LEE STETSON lend oilier schools Stetson said he said the Financial MA Office i- 'Reflection oj the econom\' working to provide assistance winch plan- "limited use" ol the waiting will permit more minority students list to fill vacancies caused by an Iwentv two percent ol the class Quakers capture Ivy football crown to matriculate.
  • Petition for Rulemaking

    Petition for Rulemaking

    REC Networks NCE Outside Urbanized Areas Petition for Rulemaking Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC In the matter of: ) ) MB Docket No. _________ Amendment of Part 73 of the Commission’s ) Rules to Introduce New Local Noncommercial ) RM-_______________ Educational Broadcast Stations Outside of Major ) Markets and Urbanized Areas ) PETITION FOR RULEMAKING OR IN THE ALTERNATE, PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RULING TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1 II. NCE POLICY HAS BEEN HISTORICALLY ABOUT “BIG AND WIDE” AS OPPOSED TO “RIGHTSIZED AND LOCAL” A. What is is a community?............................................................................... 4 B. The Willards example................................................................................... 7 C. Local communities are shut out..................................................................... 8 III. THE TECHNICAL MYTHS OF SECOND AND THIRD ADJACENT OVERLAP BY SMALLER FACILITIES HAVE ALREADY BEEN DEBUNKED A. The Raleigh waiver standard........................................................................ 9 B. LPFM’s first iteration of second-adjacent waivers....................................... 11 C. The MITRE Study for LPFM third-adjacent channels................................. 12 D. The Living Way method................................................................................ 13 E. The different definitions of “interference”
  • Man Arrested Oh Radio Show in Death of 2

    Man Arrested Oh Radio Show in Death of 2

    •5P"^»^^f"»»»" * A • ."1 • m^m^wm^mm^^m^^'m^mmmm^ T J * • * - hi*' :. • <y>.- Volume 24 Number 77 Monday, March 13/1989 Westland /Michigan 52 Pages Twenty-five cents © mtSuburtJin ConwunTeiHow CorporiiwCSTW^JU yutttvcsS. 'V • t'tsz-'. • 10 I ^ Ti-J -. t i r; : r . i By Leonard Poger adult education teacher testified editor that she initially refused to sign ah 'f 4- >. (. attendance document, which listed -I <: •\ A Wayne County school adminis­ more than double the number of stu­ -I trator testified in 18th District Court dents she actually hid in class.. Friday of numerous/ questionable The testimony frlday morning records in the Wayne-Westland and afternoon opened the first day of school district's adult education en- a preliminary exarninatlon.forthree . -sebopl-districtTemployees^and-one— "i: One was a document showing that former employee charged with falsi­ 10 persons at the Westland Convales- ' fying enrollment records so the dis­ cent Center dieOn the same day, trict could get more state aid. The Oct. 18, 1982, the day after they examination, which began one day qualified as students so the district later than scheduled after Wayne could count them for state aid reim­ County assistant prosecutor Robert bursements. In earlier testimony, a former Please tgrn to Page 2 Man arrested , .*.**»*" \F*WFgl in death of 2 ! P Dan 8lee, the Wayne-Wetttend achool dlatrlcVa executive director of atudent aervicee/waa the Police are expected to charge a day and 6 a.m. Sunday, "although we first witness to testify In the preliminary examlnatlorr. Judge Qall McKnight (center) presided over 44-year-old Westland man today can't be sure until we get the medi­ with the murders of his housemate cal examiner's report" v v :! i the exam while Tammy Thompson was the court recorder.
  • Strike Possible

    Strike Possible

    VOLUME LV, NUMBER 11 DREXEL UNIVERSITY PHILADELPHIA PA FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1979 Joblin cuts student patrol hours in half by Mark Lipiu and Chnstophnr Holden Due to a rf'cent dpcisjon, the As one Student (iuard recently tends to do everything he can to student patrol hours in Creese pul It. "We students care alot minimize the impact of this upon Student Center ('(' have b«fen more about this building We the Student F’atrol They’re very from 256 to 12« hours per week. keep It secure It's, our building effective for registration, large Kd Smith, Director of S<'curity and we want it this way It's a gatherings, social events and in said, “the decision was made by student building " Dr Joblin the C S C C on a daily basis " Dr Arthur .Johlln, Vice-President feels that. "The Student Patrol Smith confirmed that there of Student Affairs has done an excellent job They would tx" a reduction of Student When asked whether 15 guards have a place here They will Patrol working hours on the K had been laid off, Steve Allen, continue to b«' excellent " shift in C SC C He said, 1 do Asst Manager of { 'S C C in have plans to utilize them in other New Training charge of the Student F’alrol. areas " Smith was unable to replied, "I had a Student I’ntrol We w ill require a Wells Fargo utilize them in other area meeting tonight lo speak atx)ut generate<i Iraining program for Smith confirmed that there the restrucuring of the Student the Student Patrolman for things would tx- a reduction of Studcnl I’atrol In short, one Student like fires, injuries, etc " "I Ihink Patrol working hours on the K I’atrolman per shift will tx' the Student Patrol is doing a fine shift in (' S C C Me said.
  • Go Viral 9-5.Pdf

    Go Viral 9-5.Pdf

    Hello fellow musicians, artists, rappers, bands, and creatives! I’m excited you’ve decided to invest into your music career and get this incredible list of music industry contacts. You’re being proactive in chasing your own goals and dreams and I think that’s pretty darn awecome! Getting your awesome music into the media can have a TREMENDOUS effect on building your fan base and getting your music heard!! And that’s exactly what you can do with the contacts in this book! I want to encourage you to read the articles in this resource to help guide you with how and what to submit since this is a crucial part to getting published on these blogs, magazines, radio stations and more. I want to wish all of you good luck and I hope that you’re able to create some great connections through this book! Best wishes! Your Musical Friend, Kristine Mirelle VIDEO TUTORIALS Hey guys! Kristine here J I’ve put together a few tutorials below to help you navigate through this gigantic list of media contacts! I know it can be a little overwhelming with so many options and places to start so I’ve put together a few videos I’d highly recommend for you to watch J (Most of these are private videos so they are not even available to the public. Just to you as a BONUS for getting “Go Viral” TABLE OF CONTENTS What Do I Send These Contacts? There isn’t a “One Size Fits All” kind of package to send everyone since you’ll have a different end goal with each person you are contacting.
  • 678 FM Stations

    678 FM Stations

    July 6, 2017 Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Notice of Ex Parte Communication, GN Docket No. 12-268, MB Docket No. 16-306. Dear Ms. Dortch: In an effort to help its radio members better understand and prepare for the impacts of the post-auction transition of repacked television stations, NAB commissioned a study to determine which FM stations are likely to need to coordinate with TV stations making adjustments following the Incentive Auction. This analysis identifies 678 FM stations that may need to reduce power, shut down, or operate from an auxiliary facility as work is being done on a neighboring TV station antenna to ensure tower worker safety from radio frequency exposure. A copy of this analysis is attached. We look forward to working with the Commission to ensure the smoothest possible transition for broadcast viewers and listeners. Respectfully Submitted, Patrick McFadden Associate General Counsel, National Association of Broadcasters cc: Michelle Carey Barbara Kreisman Kevin Harding Mark Colombo 1771 N Street NW Washington DC 20036 2800 Phone 202 429 5300 Advocacy Education Innovation www.nab.org NAB – V-Soft Communications FM Stations Affected by the 2017 TV Band Repacking Plan Report Created For the National Association of Broadcasters John Gray Doug Vernier V-Soft Communications LLC 128 S. Chestnut St. Olathe, KS 66061 (319) 266-8402 April 21, 2017 4/21/2017 Page 1 of 4 NAB – V-Soft Communications Project Summary V-Soft Communications is pleased to provide the following report for the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB).
  • College Carrier Current: a Survey of 208 Campus-Limited Radio Stations. INSTITUTION Broadcast Inst

    College Carrier Current: a Survey of 208 Campus-Limited Radio Stations. INSTITUTION Broadcast Inst

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 085 811 CS 500 553 TITLE College Carrier Current: A Survey of 208 Campus-Limited Radio Stations. INSTITUTION Broadcast Inst. of North America, New York, N.Y. PUB DATE 72 NOTE 52p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS *College Students; Educational Research; Mass Media; *Media Research; *Programing (Broadcast) ;Publicize; *Radio; *School Surveys IDENTIFIERS *Carrier Current Radio ABSTRACT The purpose of this survey was to determine the extent to which carrier current radio has become a medium which can link and unify relatively small, well-defined groups in an effective and inexpensive way. The survey focused upon the auspices, structure, affiliation, day-to-day managerial responsibility, and administrative liaison of the stations; their commercial or non-commercial status; and the nature and scope of their programing. A multiple-choice questionnaire wAs mailed to 439 stations; of the 233 that responded, 25 stations reported that they were not operative carrier stations, resulting in a net sample of 208 stations. The findings indicated that: most stations are run as undergraduate student activities, few stations are used for formal or informal training; most stations carry commercial advertising, but few rely upon time sales for their main support; most stations rely upon institutional or student generated funds for their main support; programing consists mainly of recorded music; most stations afford little or no opportunity for student self-expression or news and public affairs programing; and most stations appear relatively free from institutional or outside controls but in most cases there appears to be little or no inclination to use this freedom innovatively.