DOCSLIB.ORG

“ [The League of Nations] Has Worked with a Growing Consciousness That

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“ [The League of Nations] Has Worked with a Growing Consciousness That The shock of Progress inside and the First World War outside “ A sense of insecurity leads to an increase of armaments; an increase in The concepts for a mechanism the League of Nations armaments further aggravates the sense of to improve international relations had already started insecurity; and, unless the circle to emerge before the First World War, but the scale of the can be broken, the process goes inevitably conflict and of its consequences spurred governments to forward. The overburdened nations can then create a formal framework for World War I resulted in: Covenant of As early as 1920, the League ¬ 1920 - The Disarmament Section is ¬ 1923 - The Draft Treaty of Mutual international cooperation. began creating the necessary established in the Secretariat by the find no release from their mutual distrust Assistance is presented to the ¬ 10 million dead, 20 million wounded the League of Nations, Article 8: mechanisms to address In 1919, the Paris Peace disarmament and produced First Assembly of Conference negotiations resulted 9 million war orphans, 5 million Fourth Assembly of the League by The Members of the League recognise some positive results, notably except in open conflict.” in the signature of the Peace war widows, 10 million refugees. the 1925 Geneva Convention the League of Nations. the Temporary Mixed Commission, Treaty of Versailles, which that the maintenance of peace requires Arthur Henderson, opening speech of the World Disarmament and Protocol, which were incorporated the Covenant of ¬ 1920-1925 - Creation and activities Conference, 2 February 1932. but no agreement is reached. ¬ The development and use of more the reduction of national armaments to reached within this framework. the League of Nations, the first From the moment of the creation The draft is based on the idea intergovernmental organization devastating armaments, such as the lowest point consistent with national The Convention for the of the Temporary Mixed Commission of the League of Nations, mandated to promote Supervision of International that war as an instrument of it was clear that its primary for the Reduction of Armaments, international cooperation and heavy artillery, tanks, airplanes safety and the enforcement by common Trade in Arms and Ammunition purpose was to prevent war and aggression must be regarded to achieve international peace, and Implements of War was mandated to address the political, and chemical weapons. that disarmament thus action of international obligations. security and disarmament. adopted to regulate the arms social and economic problems as an international crime. It constituted an essential element trade with a system of public As the pre-war arms race was ¬ Total expenses of 337 billion dollars, The Council, taking account of proposes a general international of the new international order export licenses. However, related to disarmament. considered a key factor in the a sum nearly equal to the combined that the victorious nations the geographical situation and as it was not ratified by The necessary connection system of collective security. outbreak of the war, the Peace wished to build. the signatory countries, it ¬ 1920-1932 - Creation and activities of between disarmament and Treaties included important pre-war wealth of England, France, circumstances of each State, shall Although not the first attempt never came into force. the implementation of a global ¬ 1924 - Protocol for the Pacific clauses aiming to prevent the Permanent Advisory Commission Germany and Russia. towards international formulate plans for such reduction for collective security system had further military aggression. The Protocol for the on Military, Naval and Air Questions, been recognized from the very Settlement of International Disputes, disarmament – in 1899 the First the consideration and action of the Prohibition of the Use in War The German army was restricted ¬ Up to 7 billion dollars borrowed by beginning by the Members of the Hague Conference had tried of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, also referred to as the Permanent also called the Geneva Protocol. by the Treaty of Versailles to a several Governments. League of Nations: no nations France, Great-Britain and Italy from the to establish arbitration for the or Other Gases and of maximum of 100,000 men, and wanted to disarm without their Inspired by the Draft Treaty of pacific settlement of international Bacteriological Methods of Armaments Commission, the army devoted exclusively to United States to finance the war. Such plans shall be subject to security being guaranteed by disputes - the Covenant of the Warfare prohibiting the use in Mutual Assistance, it attempts the maintenance of order and to a body of technical experts international mechanisms, More loans contracted after League of Nations for the first reconsideration and revision at least war of poisonous gases was border control. The manufacture especially in case of aggression. to create a complete system time provided nations with an ratified by 36 states by appointed by the members of or import of poison gases was the conflict to rebuild infrastructure agreed-upon global framework every ten years. the end of 1932. After unsuccessful attempts in of compulsory arbitration and prohibited, reserves were strictly the Council of the League. for disarmament. 1923 and 1924, the Locarno limited, tanks and heavy artillery and economies. After these plans shall have been The League, however, was not response by common action to The Covenant of the League of Pacts, which established forbidden, the navy reduced a universal body, not least due ¬ 1921-1922 - The Washington Naval Nations (Articles 1, 8, 9, and 23) collective security mechanisms acts of aggression. The Protocol and submarines prohibited. ¬ Germany required by the Treaty adopted by the several Governments, to the absence of the United Conference and Treaty between the at a regional level and resulted provided a very explicit States, which did not become is signed by 14 states but set In the Treaties of Neuilly, of Versailles to pay 226 billion the limits of armaments therein fixed in the admission of Germany definition of disarmament, a member even though it was USA, Great Britain, Japan, France Trianon and Saint-Germain, to the League in 1926, were Reichmarks in reparations, tightly bound together the shall not be exceeded without the a major economic and military aside in 1925 in favor of a partial the armed forces of Austria, and Italy succeeds in a limitation a very positive impulse for issues of collective security and power. As a result of this lack Hungary and Bulgaria primarily for the destruction concurrence of the Council. the decision taken in 1925 by application of the regional system, disarmament and mandated of truly global membership, and of capital ships (battleships, battle were similarly limited. the members of the League of caused in France and Belgium. the Council of the League to also due to political realities embodied in the Locarno Pacts. The Members of the League agree that cruisers and aircraft carriers). Nations Council to convene a As Clemenceau, the French formulate plans accordingly. which dictated that international the manufacture by private enterprise world disarmament conference. ¬ 1925 - Locarno Pacts, which representative at the Paris The creation of the League developments must align with ¬ 1922 - Publication of the Statistical peace negotiations, promised was a promise for a new era in of munitions and implements of war national sovereign interests, The signatories of the final included a series of treaties of in June 1919, this requirement The League of Nations relations between nations, but some important negotiations Enquiry on Armaments, the first Protocol of the Locarno is open to grave objections. The mutual guarantees and arbitration, was, however, considered the links between the issue of and decisions also took series of armament data ever Conference declared that only a first step towards a disarmament and the Peace Council shall advise how the evil effects place outside of the League, “they undertake to give their are signed by representatives of reduction and limitation of Covenant and Treaties, which were the result of such as the Washington and collected on a global scale. sincere co-operation to the armaments to prevent wars: compromises among the victors, attendant upon such manufacture can London Naval Conferences. work relating to disarmament Great Britain, France, Germany, once a collective security but which were not accepted by be prevented, due regard being had ¬ 1924 - Publication of the first already undertaken by the Italy, Belgium, Czechoslovakia, system was implemented, the the vanquished, would prove League of Nations and to limitations and reductions Disarmament to be a critical obstacle for to the necessities of those Members Armament Year Book of the League seek the realization thereof and Poland. would apply to all nations. future disarmament efforts. of Nations, published until 1938. in a general agreement.” of the League which are not able ¬ 1928 - In August, fifteen States sign By the close of 1925, everything to manufacture the munitions and ¬ 1925 - Signature of the Convention seemed to point in a positive the Kellogg–Briand Pact prohibiting “ The Parliaments and taxpayers of implements of war necessary for their for the Supervision of International direction: economies had improved, currencies had the use of war as “an instrument the various countries will not need “ The Covenant, by recognising
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radio and the Rise of the Nazis in Prewar Germany
    Radio and the Rise of the Nazis in Prewar Germany Maja Adena, Ruben Enikolopov, Maria Petrova, Veronica Santarosa, and Ekaterina Zhuravskaya* May 10, 2014 How far can the media protect or undermine democratic institutions in unconsolidated democracies, and how persuasive can they be in ensuring public support for dictator’s policies? We study this question in the context of Germany between 1929 and 1939. Radio slowed down the growth of political support for the Nazis, when Weimar government introduced pro-government political news in 1929, denying access to the radio for the Nazis up till January 1933. This effect was reversed in 5 weeks after the transfer of control over the radio to the Nazis following Hitler’s appointment as chancellor. After full consolidation of power, radio propaganda helped the Nazis to enroll new party members and encouraged denunciations of Jews and other open expressions of anti-Semitism. The effect of Nazi radio propaganda varied depending on the listeners’ predispositions toward the message. Nazi radio was most effective in places where anti-Semitism was historically high and had a negative effect on the support for Nazi messages in places with historically low anti-Semitism. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! * Maja Adena is from Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. Ruben Enikolopov is from Barcelona Institute for Political Economy and Governance, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona GSE, and the New Economic School, Moscow. Maria Petrova is from Barcelona Institute for Political Economy and Governance, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona GSE, and the New Economic School. Veronica Santarosa is from the Law School of the University of Michigan. Ekaterina Zhuravskaya is from Paris School of Economics (EHESS) and the New Economic School.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrimination and Law in Nazi Germany
    Cohen Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies Name:_______________________________ at Keene State College __________________________________________________________________________________________________ “To Remember…and to Teach.” www.keene.edu/cchgs Student Outline: Destroying Democracy From Within (1933-1938) 1. In the November 1932 elections the Nazis received _______ (%) of the vote. 2. Hitler was named Chancellor of a right-wing coalition government on _________________ _____, __________. 3. Hitler’s greatest fear is that he could be dismissed by President ____________________________. 4. Hitler’s greatest unifier of the many conservatives was fear of the _____________. 5. The Reichstag Fire Decree of February 1933 allowed Hitler to use article _______ to suspend the Reichstag and suspend ________________ ____________ for all Germans. 6. In March 5, 1933 election, the Nazi Party had _________ % of the vote. 7. Concentration camps (KL) emerged from below as camps for “__________________ ________________” prisoners. 8. On March 24, 1933, the _______________ Act gave Hitler power to rule as dictator during the declared “state of emergency.” It was the __________________ Center Party that swayed the vote in Hitler’s favor. 9. Franz Schlegelberger became the State Secretary in the German Ministry of ___________________. He believed that the courts role was to maintain ________________ __________________. He based his rulings on the principle of the ____________________ ___________________ order. He endorsed the Enabling Act because the government, in his view, could act with _______________, ________________, and _____________________. 10. One week after the failed April 1, 1933 Boycott, the Nazis passed the “Law for the Restoration of the Professional _________________ ______________________. The April 11 supplement attempted to legally define “non-Aryan” as someone with a non-Aryan ____________________ or ________________________.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Appeasement
    Colonial Appeasement coming to power in 1933, even though the Nazi leader’s territorial ambitions focused (1935–38) on Eastern Europe, as indicated in his infa- PAUL W. DOERR mous memoir Mein Kampf.Afewsenior Acadia University, Canada Nazis also hoped for a colonial foothold in Africa, but the early years of Hitler’s regime were taken up with other, more urgent Colonial appeasement is a largely forgotten matters. aspectofBritishappeasement.Duringthe British officials and policy-makers had, years from 1935 to 1938 the British govern- throughout the 1920s, strongly rejected any ment gave serious attention to the possibility suggestion of returning colonies to Germany. of granting Germany colonial possessions But the deteriorating world economic situa- in Africa as part of a “general settlement” tion after 1929, combined with the growing with the Nazi regime. Various schemes for threat to the peace from Hitler’s Germany, transferring African territories to German forced the British to rethink their position. jurisdiction were considered, but serious Gradually the idea began to emerge that per- obstacles arose and, with the exception of haps colonies could be returned to Germany one formal proposal from the British in early as part of a much larger general settlement of 1938, talks with the Germans on the subject the situation in Europe. never moved beyond vague generalities. On March 7, 1936, Hitler sent German Prior to the First World War, Germany troops into the demilitarized zone of Ger- held four territories in Africa, namely Ger- many. He then issued a series of demands, man East Africa, German South-West Africa, oneofwhichwasacallforequalityofcolonial Kamerun, and Togoland.
    [Show full text]
  • Austerity and the Rise of the Nazi Party Gregori Galofré-Vilà, Christopher M
    Austerity and the Rise of the Nazi party Gregori Galofré-Vilà, Christopher M. Meissner, Martin McKee, and David Stuckler NBER Working Paper No. 24106 December 2017, Revised in September 2020 JEL No. E6,N1,N14,N44 ABSTRACT We study the link between fiscal austerity and Nazi electoral success. Voting data from a thousand districts and a hundred cities for four elections between 1930 and 1933 shows that areas more affected by austerity (spending cuts and tax increases) had relatively higher vote shares for the Nazi party. We also find that the localities with relatively high austerity experienced relatively high suffering (measured by mortality rates) and these areas’ electorates were more likely to vote for the Nazi party. Our findings are robust to a range of specifications including an instrumental variable strategy and a border-pair policy discontinuity design. Gregori Galofré-Vilà Martin McKee Department of Sociology Department of Health Services Research University of Oxford and Policy Manor Road Building London School of Hygiene Oxford OX1 3UQ & Tropical Medicine United Kingdom 15-17 Tavistock Place [email protected] London WC1H 9SH United Kingdom Christopher M. Meissner [email protected] Department of Economics University of California, Davis David Stuckler One Shields Avenue Università Bocconi Davis, CA 95616 Carlo F. Dondena Centre for Research on and NBER Social Dynamics and Public Policy (Dondena) [email protected] Milan, Italy [email protected] Austerity and the Rise of the Nazi party Gregori Galofr´e-Vil`a Christopher M. Meissner Martin McKee David Stuckler Abstract: We study the link between fiscal austerity and Nazi electoral success.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Peace Operations
    OROLSI is comprised of five components: “UN Peacekeeping deploys to some of the most complex OFFICE OF RULE OF LAW & SECURITY INSTITUTIONS and difficult places, protecting some of the world’s most United Nations Police Division (PD) vulnerable. We are working in partnership with Member States to implement the Secretary-General’s Action for Where requested and mandated, United Nations Police (UNPOL) supports Member States to realize effective, efficient, representative, responsive and accountable police services that Peacekeeping initiative to strengthen peacekeeping, including serve and protect the population. UNPOL build and support police capacity to prevent and to improve how we protect civilians, which is at the heart of detect crime, protect life and property and maintain public order and safety in adherence our work. For hundreds of millions, peacekeeping is the last to the rule of law and international human rights norms. The United Nations Police Division best hope and it needs all our support.” supports UNPOL by selecting, recruiting, deploying and rotating personnel in UN peace operations; developing policy and guidance; providing strategic and operational support, Jean-Pierre Lacroix Under-Secretary-General for Peace Operations including through the Standing Police Capacity; and facilitating assessments and evaluations. Justice and Corrections Service (JCS) Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) OROLSI colleagues are at the forefront of efforts to enhance The Justice and Corrections Service serves as a center of expertise on justice and the performance and accountability of peacekeepers, includ- corrections areas and supports the work of justice and corrections components in OROLSI is committed to ing by conducting trainings and assessments of Formed Police United Nations peace operations and other UN entities.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council History
    Mayor Commissioner Commissioner Albert Kirchner Hugo Stratemann April 1924 - April 1926 Ferdinand Blumberg Resigned in Mar. 1925 Appointed in Jan. 1924 Fire, Ordinance, Sanitation, Cemeteries, Streets, Bridges, Fair Grounds, Lights, Election 4/1/1924 Finance, Police, Water Works, Street Lights, and Building and Hospital Parks, and Telephone & Telegraph Alfred Staats Hugo Stratemann April 1926 - April 1928 Hilmar Triesch Appointed in Apr. 1925 Pro Tem 4/26 - 4/32 Fire & Police, Ordinance, Cemeteries, Streets, Bridges, Fair Grounds, Lights, Election 4/6/1926 Finance, Water Works, Building, Sanitation, and Sewer Hospital, and Parks and Telephone & Telegraph April 1928 - April 1930 Hilmar Triesch George Reininger Hugo Stratemann Streets, Bridges, Street Lights, Pro Tem 4/26 - 4/32 Election 4/3/1928 Finance, Water Works, Public Utilities, Building, Cemeteries, and Sewer and Sanitation Fire & Police, Fair Grounds, Hospital, and Parks April 1930 - April 1932 Hilmar Triesch George Reininger Hugo Stratemann Resigned in Jan. 1931 Streets, Bridges, Street Lights, Pro Tem 4/26 - 4/32 Election 4/1/1930 Finance, Water Works, Public Utilities, Building, Cemeteries, and Sewer and Sanitation Fire & Police, Fair Grounds, Hospital, and Parks Hilmar Fischer George Reininger Louis Voigt April 1932 - April 1934 Pro Tem 4/32 - 4/34 Appointed in Feb. 1931 Streets, Bridges, Fair Grounds, Public Utilities, Street Lights, Sanitation, Election 4/5/1932 Finance, Fire & Police, Water Works, and Cemeteries and Public Buildings Sewer, Incinerator, Hospital, and Parks
    [Show full text]
  • Disarmament a Basic Guide
    Disarmament A Basic Guide by Melissa Gillis Third Edition United Nations, New York, 2012 Note THE UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR DISARMAMENT AFFAIRS has published the Ba- sic Guide pursuant to the purposes of the United Nations Disarmament Informa- tion Programme. The mandate of the Programme is to inform, educate and gener- ate public understanding of the importance of multilateral action, and support for it, in the field of arms limitation and disarmament. For more information, contact: Information and Outreach Branch United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs United Nations New York, NY 10017 Telephone: 212.963.3022 Email: [email protected] Website: www.un.org/disarmament THE FIRST EDITION of the Guide was originally written by Bhaskar Menon and pub- lished in 2001 in collaboration with the Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Committee on Disarmament, Peace and Security. The second edition was authored and edited by Melissa Gillis, the editor of Disarmament Times, and was published in 2009. Ms. Gillis edited this third edition and provided updated text where ap- propriate. The Guide is intended for the general reader, but may also be useful for the disarmament educator or trainer. COVER DESIGN based on the United Nations poster entitled “The United Nations for a Better World”, designed by Ricardo Ernesto Jaime de Freitas. THE VIEWS expressed are those of the author/editor and do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations. MATERIAL appearing in the Guide may be reprinted without permission, provided that credit is given to the author/editor and to the United Nations. Since 1972, the NGO COMMITTEE ON DISARMAMENT, PEACE AND SECURITY has provided services to citizens’ groups concerned with the peace and disarmament activities of the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Submarine and the Washington Conference Of
    477 THE SUBMARINE AND THE WASHINGTON CONFERENCE OF 1921 Lawrence H. Douglas Following the First World War, the tation of this group, simply stated, was tide of public opinion was overwhelm­ that second best in naval strength meant ingly against the submarine as a weapon last. A policy of naval superiority was of war. The excesses of the German necessary, they felt, for "history consis­ U-boat had stunned the sensibilities of tently shows that war between no two the world but had, nonetheless, pre­ peoples or nations can be unthink­ sented new ideas and possibilities of this able.,,1 A second group, the Naval weapon to the various naval powers of Advisory Committee (Admirals Pratt the time. The momentum of these new and Coontz and Assistant Secretary of ideas proved so strong that by the the Navy Theodore Roosevelt, Jr.) also opening of the first major international submitted recommendations concerning disarmament conference of the 20th the limitation of naval armaments. century, practical uses of the submarine From the outset their deliberations were had all but smothered the moral indig­ guided by a concern that had become nation of 1918. more and more apparent-the threat Several months prior to the opening posed to the security and interests of of the conference, the General Board of this country by Japan. This concern was the American Navy was given the task evidenced in an attempt to gain basic of developing guidelines and recommen­ understandings with Britain. dations to be used by the State Depart­ The submarine received its share of ment in determining the American attention in the deliberations of these proposals to be presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Demilitarization and Conversion
    BIONN NTERNATIONAL C ENTER FOR C ONVERSION. I NTERNATIONALES K ONVERSIONSZENTRUM B ONN paper1 Demilitarization and Conversion World Social Summit Copenhagen, March 1995 Michael Brzoska, Kees Kingma, Herbert Wulf The authors are members of the staff of the Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC). Dr. Michael Brzoska is head of the research department, Kees Kingma is project leader of demobilization and demilitarization projects, Dr. Herbert Wulf is director of BICC. BICC. AN DER ELISABETHKIRCHE 25 53113. BONN GERMANY. PHONE +49-228-9 11 96-0. FAX +49-228-24 12 15 Background Paper for the Panel Demilitarization and Conversion Conversion of Military Structures—A Challenge for the International Scientific Community and an Opportunity for Global Security and Social Development at the World Social Summit Copenhagen, 8 March 1995 Bonn International Center for Conversion Michael Brzoska, Kees Kingma and Herbert Wulf1 1The authors are all members of staff at the Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC). Dr. Michael Brzoska is head of the research department, Kees Kingma is project leader of demobilization and demilitarization projects, Dr. Herbert Wulf is the director of BICC. Demilitarization and Conversion Conversion of Military Structures - A Challenge for the International Scientific Community and an Opportunity for Global Security and Social Development prepared for the World Social Summit, Copenhagen, March 1995 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Elements of a comprehensive concept of conversion 3. Benefits and costs of conversion 4. Redistributing resources through conversion 5. Reorientation of science for social development 6. Security aspects of conversion 7. Summary: Military conversion for social development References Appendix tables - 2 - I.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 8: Handout 1 Timeline: Hitler’S Rise to Power
    Lesson 8: Handout 1 Timeline: Hitler’s rise to power 1. 1919 — Weimar Constitution is adopted. The constitution creates separate executive, judicial, and legislative branches of government so that one group or person cannot hold all of the power. It also includes articles protecting civil liberties (freedoms) such as freedom of speech, freedom of assembly (freedom to meet in public), and freedom of religion. The constitution also protects privacy so that individuals cannot be searched without the court’s permission. 2. 1919 — The constitution includes Article 48. This article suspends the constitution in times of emergency, allowing the president to make rules without the consent of the parliament and to suspend (put on hold) civil rights, like freedom of speech, in order to protect public safety. Many people thought this article was a good idea because there were so many political parties in Germany that sometimes it was difficult for them to agree enough to pass any laws. At times of crisis, like the inflation Germany suffered in 1923 or the depression in 1929, it was important for government to respond quickly and not be held from action by politicians who can not agree. Thus, many Germans thought it would be wise to have a clause in the constitution that would allow the president to take over and make quick decisions in times of emergency. 3. July 1932 — The Nazi Party wins 37% of the votes. For the first time, the Nazis are the largest and most powerful political party in Germany. Still, over half of the German citi - zens do not vote for the Nazis and they still do not have enough seats in the Reichstag (parliament) to be able to pass laws without getting additional votes from representa - tives from other political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Campus Comment, April 1932 (Senior Issue) Bridgewater State Teachers College
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University The ommeC nt Campus Journals and Publications 1932 Campus Comment, April 1932 (Senior Issue) Bridgewater State Teachers College Volume 5 Number 7 Recommended Citation Bridgewater State Teachers College. (1932). Campus Comment, April 1932 (Senior Issue). 5(7). Retrieved from: http://vc.bridgew.edu/comment/25 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. "l\Iuch Ado Yearbook Dance About Nothing" Saturday, Next Friday CAMPUS CO NT May 14 STATE TEACHERS COLLEGE., BRIDGEWATER. ~lASS. Vol. V SENIOR ISSUE No.7 Dramatic Club to Present Gradu.atioll Dates Normal School Principal June 10-Senior Prom. June 19-Graduation Vespers, 4 P. M. ~~Much Ado About Nothing" June 20-Class Day, 10.30 o'clock. June 20":'-'Graduation, 2.00 o'clock. Becolnes College President .-------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------e -\0 MISS ADELAIDE MOFFITT Dr. Brotherstoll DR. ARTHUR C. BOYDEN IS COACH DESERVES DISTINCTION Clllture Speak.er Rose Tinsley William B. Carey On Friday evening, May 13, at 7.45 Next- Wednesday Dr. Arthur C. Boyden thinks that p. m. "Much Ado About Nothing" by changing the name to Teacher Col­ William Shakespeare ,,,ill be pre- KATHERINE OSBORNE, JUNE 3 lege is another step forward in the sented by the Dramatic Club in the life history of Bridgewater. Horace ~Iann Auditorium. The stu- I K. M. B. In answer to the question, "What dents, each year, look forv..~ard to the I "What Is Philosophy Good For" is are your reactions to being· the last Shakespearean play which the club to be the subject of Dr.
    [Show full text]