Sodium Hexametaphosphate from China

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sodium Hexametaphosphate from China Sodium Hexametaphosphate From China Investigation No. 731-TA-1110 (Preliminary) Publication 3912 April 2007 U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS Daniel R. Pearson, Chairman Shara L. Aranoff, Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun Charlotte R. Lane Irving A. Williamson Dean A. Pinkert Robert A. Rogowsky Director of Operations Staff assigned Debra Baker, Investigator Philip Stone, Industry Analyst Craig Thomsen, Economist John Ascienzo, Accountant/Auditor Robin Turner, Attorney George L. Deyman, Supervisory Investigator Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Sodium Hexametaphosphate From China Investigation No. 731-TA-1110 (Preliminary) Publication 3912 April 2007 CONTENTS Page Determination................................................................... 1 Views of the Commission ......................................................... 3 Separate and additional views of Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner Deanna Tanner Okun concerning Bratsk Aluminum v. United States .................................. 19 Part I: Introduction .............................................................. I-1 Background .................................................................. I-1 Organization of the report....................................................... I-1 Summary data................................................................ I-2 Previous and related investigations................................................ I-2 Nature and extent of alleged sales at LTFV ......................................... I-3 The subject product ............................................................ I-3 U.S. tariff treatment......................................................... I-4 The domestic like product ....................................................... I-4 Description and uses ........................................................ I-5 Production process .......................................................... I-8 Data on product types .......................................................... I-9 Part II: Conditions of competition in the U.S. market ................................... II-1 Channels of distribution........................................................ II-1 Lead times................................................................ II-1 Internet sales .............................................................. II-1 Market segments.............................................................. II-1 Supply and demand considerations ................................................ II-2 U.S. supply ............................................................... II-2 U.S. demand .............................................................. II-2 Cost share ................................................................ II-3 Qualification/certification.................................................... II-3 Substitute products ......................................................... II-4 Substitutability issues .......................................................... II-4 Interchangeability .......................................................... II-4 Non-price differences ....................................................... II-5 Elasticity estimates............................................................ II-5 U.S. supply elasticity ........................................................ II-5 U.S. demand elasticity....................................................... II-6 Substitution elasticity ....................................................... II-6 Part III: U.S. producers’ production, shipments, and employment .......................... III-1 U.S. producers ............................................................... III-1 U.S. producers’ imports and purchases ............................................. III-2 U.S. producers’ capacity, production, and capacity utilization .......................... III-2 U.S. producers’ shipments ...................................................... III-3 U.S. producers’ inventories ..................................................... III-4 U.S. producers’ employment, wages, and productivity ................................ III-4 Continued. i CONTENTS–Continued Page Part IV: U.S. imports, apparent consumption, and market shares........................... IV-1 U.S. importers................................................................ IV-1 U.S. imports ................................................................. IV-1 Calculation of U.S. imports................................................... IV-1 U.S. import trends.......................................................... IV-5 The question of negligible imports ............................................. IV-6 Apparent U.S. consumption and U.S. market shares .................................. IV-7 Part V: Pricing and related information............................................... V-1 Factors affecting prices......................................................... V-1 Raw material costs.......................................................... V-1 Tariffs and transportation costs................................................ V-1 Exchange rates............................................................. V-1 Pricing practices.............................................................. V-2 Pricing methods ............................................................ V-2 Sales terms and discounts .................................................... V-3 Price data ................................................................... V-3 Price trends ............................................................... V-3 Price comparisons .......................................................... V-6 Lost sales and lost revenues ..................................................... V-6 Part VI: Financial experience of U.S. producers........................................ VI-1 Background .................................................................. VI-1 Operations on SHMP .......................................................... VI-1 Capital expenditures and research and development expenses ........................... VI-3 Assets and return on investment .................................................. VI-3 Capital and investment......................................................... VI-3 Part VII: Threat considerations..................................................... VII-1 The industry in China .......................................................... VII-1 Nonsubject manufacturers ...................................................... VII-2 Importers’ U.S. inventories...................................................... VII-2 Anticipated shipments of SHMP from China........................................ VII-3 Appendices A. Federal Register notices ...................................................... A-1 B. Conference witnesses ......................................................... B-1 C. Summary data .............................................................. C-1 D. Information on prices of SHMP from nonsubject countries ........................... D-1 Note.--Information that would reveal confidential operations of individual concerns may not be published and therefore has been deleted from this report. Such deletions are indicated by asterisks. ii UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Investigation No. 731-TA-1110 (Preliminary) SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE (SHMP) FROM CHINA DETERMINATION On the basis of the record1 developed in the subject investigation, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1673b(a)) (the Act), that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports from China of sodium hexametaphosphate, provided for in subheadings 2835.39.50 and 3823.90.39 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). COMMENCEMENT OF FINAL PHASE INVESTIGATION Pursuant to section 207.18 of the Commission’s rules, the Commission also gives notice of the commencement of the final phase of its investigation. The Commission will issue a final phase notice of scheduling, which will be published in the Federal Register as provided in section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules, upon notice from the Department of Commerce (Commerce) of an affirmative preliminary determination in the investigation under section 733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary determination is negative, upon notice of an affirmative final determination in that investigation under section 735(a) of the Act. Parties that filed entries of appearance in the preliminary phase of the investigation need not enter a separate appearance for the final phase of the investigation. Industrial users, and, if the merchandise under investigation is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations have the right to appear as parties in Commission antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. The Secretary will prepare a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the investigation. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2007, a petition was filed with the Commission and Commerce by ICL Performance Products, LP, St.
Recommended publications
  • Sodium Acid Pyrophosphate (SAPP)
    Sodium Acid Pyrophosphate (SAPP) Sodium acid pyrophosphate (Disodium pyrophosphate) is a buffering and chelating agent, with many food and industrial uses. It is polyvalent, and acts as a Lewis base, so is effective at binding polyvalent cations. It is manufactured by the reaction of sodium carbonate withphosphoric acid. followed by heating of the resulting sodium phosphate to 220 degrees Celsius. Specification: Trisodium Phosphate Anhydrous Identifiers SKU: D9028 Items Spec Food Grade Industrial Grade CAS number: 7758-16-9 HS Code: 2835.22.0000 Purity (as Na2H2P2O7) % ≥ 95 95 Properties % ≤ 0.002 Heavy Metal (as Pb) Molecular formula: Na2H2P2O7 Molar Mass: Arsenic (as) % ≤ 0.0003 221.94g/mol Fluoride (as F) % ≤ 0.005 Density: 1.1-1.3g/cm3 Melting Point: >600 °C 3.5-4.5 3.5-4.5 PH (1% aqueous solution) Appearance: white powder Solubility in Water: Water Insoluble % ≤ 1.0 1.0 11.9 g/100 mL (20°C ) Standard GB 2928-1999 HG 2928-1999 Protection Do not ingest. Do not breathe dust. In case of insufficient ventilation, wear suitable respiratory equipment If ingested, seek medical advice immediately and show the container or the label. Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Keep away from incompatibles such as oxidizing agents, acids. Packing and Storage In double layer bags of net weight of 25 Kg or 50 Kg, store at a cool, dry and well ventilated place. Applications Food uses Sodium acid pyrophosphate is a GRAS substance for food use. It is used in canned seafood to maintain color and reduce purge[clarification needed] during retorting. Retorting achieves microbial stability with heat.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Designated Food Additives
    The Japan Food chemical Research Faundation List of Designated Food Additives The substances below are the designated food additives appearing in Appended Table 1, as mentioned in Article 12 of the Enforcement Regulations under the Food Sanitation Law. These additives are listed here in alphabetical order. They are 472 in total as of January 15, 2021. The number preceding the name of each additive is the sequence number given to the corresponding additive in the original Japanese table.The names of the substances are translated by the Foundation from the Japanese original. 16 Acesulfame Potassium(Acesulfame K) 20 Acetaldehyde 332 Glacial Acetic Acid 23 Acetone 22 Acetophenone 17 Acetylated Distarch Adipate 19 Acetylated Distarch Phosphate 18 Acetylated Oxidized Starch 5 Adipic Acid 26 Advantame 32 DL-Alanine 196 Aliphatic Higher Alcohols 197 Aliphatic Higher Aldehydes (except those generally recognized as highly toxic) 198 Aliphatic Higher Hydrocarbons (except those generally recognized as highly toxic) 183 Allyl Cyclohexylpropionate 377 Allyl Hexanoate (Allyl Caproate) 55 Allyl Isothiocyanate (Volatile Oil of Mustard) 446 Aluminum Ammonium Sulfate (Crystal: Ammonium Alum, Dried: Burnt Ammonium Alum) 447 Aluminum Potassium Sulfate (Crystal: Alum or Potassium Alum, Dried: Burnt Alum) 29 (3-Amino-3-carboxypropyl)dimethylsulfonium Chloride 45 Ammonia 36 Ammonium Alginate 248 Ammonium Bicarbonate (Ammonium Hydrogen Carbonate) 245 Ammonium Carbonate 85 Ammonium Chloride 463 Ammonium Dihydrogen Phosphate (Ammonium Phosphate, Monobasic) 33 Ammonium
    [Show full text]
  • Rev. 24A Table 2: Pacs by Chemical Name
    Table 2: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) Rev 24A based on applicable 60-minute AEGLs, ERPGs, or TEELs (Chemicals listed in alphabetical order) PAC Rev 24A – May 2009 Table 2 presents an alphabetical listing of the chemicals in the PAC data set and provides the Chemical Abstract Service Registry Numbers (CASRNs), PAC data, and technical comments focusing on changes in the PAC values since the previous version of the PAC/TEEL data set (Rev 23). PAC values are provided for TEEL-0, PAC-1, PAC-2, and PAC-3. Values are given in parts per million (ppm) for gases and volatile liquids and in milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) for particulate materials (aerosols) and nonvolatile liquids. The columns presented in Table 2 provide the following information: Heading Definition No. The ordered numbering of the chemicals as they appear in this alphabetical listing. Chemical The common name of the chemical. Name CASRN The Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number for this chemical. TEEL-0 This is the threshold concentration below which most people will experience no appreciable risk of health effects. This PAC is always based on TEEL-0 because AEGL-0 or ERPG-0 values do not exist. PAC-1 Based on the applicable AEGL-1, ERPG-1, or TEEL-1 value. PAC-2 Based on the applicable AEGL-2, ERPG-2, or TEEL-2 value. PAC-3 Based on the applicable AEGL-3, ERPG-3, or TEEL-3 value. Units The units for the PAC values (ppm or mg/m3). Comments and Technical comments by the developers of the PAC data set.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Designated Additives
    The Japan Food chemical Research Faundation List of Designated Additives The substances below are the designated additives appearing in Table 1, as mentioned in Article 12 of the Enforcement Regulations under the Food Sanitation Law. These additives are listed here in alphabetic order. They are 455 in total as of July 03, 2018. The number preceding the name of each additive is the sequence number given to the corresponding additive in the original Japanese table. 16 Acesulfame Potassium(Acesulfame K) 20 Acetaldehyde 322 Acetic Acid, Glacial 23 Acetone 22 Acetophenone 17 Acetylated Distarch Adipate 19 Acetylated Distarch Phosphate 18 Acetylated Oxidized Starch 5 Adipic Acid 26 Advantame 32 DL-Alanine 190 Aliphatic Higher Alcohols 191 Aliphatic Higher Aldehydes (except those generally recognized as highly toxic) 192 Aliphatic Higher Hydrocarbons (except those generally recognized as highly toxic) 178 Allyl Cyclohexylpropionate 364 Allyl Hexanoate (Allyl Caproate) 53 Allyl Isothiocyanate (Volatile Oil of Mustard) 429 Aluminum Ammonium Sulfate (Crystal: Ammonium Alum, Desiccated: Burnt Ammonium Alum) 430 Aluminum Potassium Sulfate (Crystal: Alum or Potassium Alum, Desiccated: Burnt Alum) 29 (3-Amino-3-carboxypropyl)dimethylsulfonium chloride 43 Ammonia 35 Ammonium Alginate 240 Ammonium Bicarbonate (Ammonium Hydrogen Carbonate) 237 Ammonium Carbonate 81 Ammonium Chloride 446 Ammonium Dihydrogen Phosphate (Ammonium Phosphate, Monobasic or Monoammonium Phosphate) 44 Ammonium isovalerate 98 Ammonium Persulfate 431 Ammonium Sulfate 30 Amylalcohol
    [Show full text]
  • Sodium Hexametaphosphate from China
    Sodium Hexametaphosphate From China Investigation No. 731-TA-1110 (Final) Publication 3984 March 2008 Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS Daniel R. Pearson, Chairman Shara L. Aranoff, Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun Charlotte R. Lane Irving A. Williamson Dean A. Pinkert Robert A. Rogowsky Director of Operations Staff assigned Debra Baker, Investigator Philip Stone, Industry Analyst Craig Thomsen, Economist John Ascienzo, Auditor Robin Turner, Attorney Mara Alexander, Statistician George Deyman, Supervisory Investigator Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Sodium Hexametaphosphate From China Investigation No. 731-TA-1110 (Final) Publication 3984 March 2008 CONTENTS Page Determination................................................................... 1 Views of the Commission ......................................................... 3 Part I: Introduction .............................................................. I-1 Background .................................................................. I-1 Organization of the report....................................................... I-1 Summary data................................................................ I-2 Previous and related investigations................................................ I-3 Nature and extent of sales at LTFV ............................................... I-3 The subject
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Assessment of Phosphoric Acid and Simple Salts As Used in Cosmetics
    Safety Assessment of Phosphoric Acid and Simple Salts as Used in Cosmetics Status: Scientific Literature Review for Public Comment Release Date: November, 2015 Panel Date: March 31-April 1, 2016 All interested persons are provided 60 days from the above date to comment on this safety assessment and to identify additional published data that should be included or provide unpublished data which can be made public and included. Information may be submitted without identifying the source or the trade name of the cosmetic product containing the ingredient. All unpublished data submitted to CIR will be discussed in open meetings, will be available at the CIR office for review by any interested party and may be cited in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Please submit data, comments, or requests to the CIR Director, Dr. Lillian J. Gill. The 2015 Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel members are: Chair, Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D., F.A.C.P.; Donald V. Belsito, M.D.; Ronald A. Hill, Ph.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel C. Liebler, Ph.D.; James G. Marks, Jr., M.D.; Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M., Ph.D. The CIR Director is Lillian J. Gill, D.P.A. This report was prepared by Wilbur Johnson, Jr., M.S., Senior Scientific Analyst and Bart Heldreth, Ph.D., Chemist. © Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1620 L STREET, NW, SUITE 1200 ◊ WASHINGTON, DC 20036-4702 ◊ PH 202.331.0651 ◊ FAX 202.331.0088 ◊ [email protected] INTRODUCTION The safety of the following 31 ingredients, phosphoric acid and its salts, as used
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Directive 2002/82/EC Amending Directive 96
    28.10.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 292/1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2002/82/EC of 15 October 2002 amending Directive 96/77/EC laying down specific purity criteria on food additives other than colours and sweeteners (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, (4) It is necessary to take into account the specifications and analytical techniques for additives as set out in the Codex Alimentarius as drafted by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). Community, (5) Directive 96/77/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. Having regard to Council Directive 89/107/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning food additives authorised for use in (6) The measures provided for in this Directive are in foodstuffs intended for human consumption (1), as amended accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee by Directive 94/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the on the Food Chain and Animal Health, Council (2) and in particular Article 3(3)(a) thereof, HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: After consulting the Scientific Committee on Food, Whereas: Article 1 The Annex to Directive 96/77/EC is amended as set out in the (1) Directive 95/2/EC of the European Parliament and of Annex to this Directive. the Council of 20 February 1995 on food additives other than colours and sweeteners (3), as last amended by Directive 2001/5/EC (4), lists those substances which may be used as additives other than colours and Article 2 sweeteners in foodstuffs.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Menu Nutritional Summary by Region 2.20.2020.Xlsx
    The nutritional values provided in this guide or shown on menus or menu boards should be considered approximations. Variations in nutritional values throughout this menu may occur due to deviations in preparation, availability of ingredients, seasonal changes, cooking processes and custom ordering. Data is rounded to meet FDA regulations. 2,000 calories a day is used for general nutrition advice, but calorie needs vary. All of our food items are produced in facilities where known allergens are present. We cannot guarantee that any of our products are free from allergens (including dairy, eggs, soy, tree nuts, wheat and others) as we use shared equipment to store, prepare and serve them. Food Menu Nutritionals_Hot Breakfast (Chicago) Saturated Cholesterol Sodium Total Dietary Protein Product Category Supplier Item Calories Total Fat (g) Trans Fat (g) Sugars (g) Fat (g) (mg) (mg) Carbohydrates (g) Fiber (g) (g) Hot Breakfast Good to Go Fresh Bacon, Egg and Cheese Muffin 420 18 7 0 160 730 31 1 1 20.5 Hot Breakfast Good to Go Fresh Green Chile, Egg and Cheese Burrito 522 21 10 0 136 993 49 3 1 18 Hot Breakfast Good to Go Fresh Sausage, Egg, Potato and Cheese Burrito 505 30 13 0 116 1190 41 2 1 23 Hot Breakfast Good to Go Fresh Turkey Bacon, Egg, Cheese Burrito 600 29 11 0 200 1567 44 1 1 36 Product Category Supplier Item Ingredients ENGLISH MUFFIN (ENRICHED FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, NIACIN, IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID), WATER, DEGERMED CORNMEAL, EAST, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS: SALT, VEGETABLE OIL (CANOLA OR SOY), SUGAR, WHEAT
    [Show full text]
  • Calcium Chloride in the "Calcium Chloride Process" (21 CFR 184.1191)
    Phosphates Handling/Processing 1 2 Identification of Petitioned Substances 3 This report addresses the following phosphate salts allowed under the National Organic Program (NOP) 4 regulations at 7 CFR 205.605(b): calcium phosphates (monobasic, dibasic and tribasic), potassium 5 phosphate, sodium acid pyrophosphate, and sodium phosphates. Chemical identifications of these 6 phosphates are included in Table 1. 7 8 Table 1: Chemical Identification of the Phosphates Listed at 7 CFR 205.605(b). Chemical Names Chemical Formula CAS Nos. E/INS No. Calcium phosphate, monobasic Calcium dihydrogen phosphate Ca(H2PO4)2 (anhydrous) 7758-23-8 Calcium biphosphate Calcium bis(dihydrogen phosphate) E 341(i) Monocalcium phosphate Primary calcium phosphate Ca(H2PO4)2 · 1 H2O 10031-30-8 Acid calcium phosphate Calcium diorthophosphate Calcium phosphate, dibasic CaHPO4 (anhydrous) 7757-93-9 Calcium hydrogen phosphate E 341(ii) Monocalcium acid phosphate CaHPO4· 2 H2O 7789-77-7 Dicalcium orthophosphate Calcium phosphate, tribasic Tricalcium diphosphate Ca3(PO4)2 (anhydrous) 7758-87-4 E 341(iii) Tricalcium phosphate Tricalcium orthophosphate Dipotassium phosphate (anhydrous) Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate K2HPO4 (anhydrous) 7758-11-4 Potassium hydrogen phosphate E 340(ii) Potassium dibasic phosphate K2HPO4· 3 H2O 16788-57-1 Potassium phosphate dibasic Sodium acid pyrophosphate (SAPP) Disodium diphosphate Na2H2P2O7 (anhydrous) 7758-16-9 E 450(vi) Disodium dihydrogen pyrophosphate; Diphosphoric acid, disodium salt Monosodium phosphate 7558-80-7 NaH2PO4 (anhydrous)
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Assessment of Phosphoric Acid and Its Salts As Used in Cosmetics
    Safety Assessment of Phosphoric Acid and Its Salts as Used in Cosmetics Status: Final Report Release Date: November 16, 2016 Panel Date: September 26-27, 2016 The 2016 Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel members are: Chair, Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D., F.A.C.P.; Donald V. Belsito, M.D.; Ronald A. Hill, Ph.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel C. Liebler, Ph.D.; James G. Marks, Jr., M.D.; Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M., Ph.D. The CIR Director is Lillian J. Gill, D.P.A. This report was prepared by Wilbur Johnson, Jr., M.S., Senior Scientific Analyst, Ivan Boyer, Ph.D., Toxicologist, and Bart Heldreth, Ph.D., Chemist. © Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1620 L STREET, NW, SUITE 1200 ◊ WASHINGTON, DC 20036-4702 ◊ PH 202.331.0651 ◊ FAX 202.331.0088 ◊ [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of Phosphoric Acid and its salts (31 ingredients), which function as buffering agents, corrosion inhibitors, chelating agents, and pH adjusters in cosmetic products. The Panel reviewed data relating to the safety of these ingredients, and concluded that Phosphoric Acid and its salts are safe in the present practices of use and concentration in cosmetics when formulated to be non-irritating. INTRODUCTION The safety of the following 31 ingredients, as used in cosmetics (with systematic nomenclature in parenthesis when different from the ingredient name), is reviewed in this safety assessment: Phosphoric Acid • (calcium hydrogen Phosphate Buffered Saline
    [Show full text]
  • SODIUM ACID PYROPHOSPHATE (SAPP) in Produce
    PETITION TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIC STANDARDS BOARD For the Use of SODIUM ACID PYROPHOSPHATE (SAPP) In Produce Item A: This Petition supports the International Food Additives Council’s (IFAC) request to amend the National List for “Nonagricultural (nonorganic) substances allowed in or on processed products labeled as ‘organic’ or made with organic (specified ingredients)” under Section 205.605(b). This Petition relates to Sodium Acid Pyrophosphate (SAPP) as described in the Food Chemicals Codex (FCC), as amended, including alternative nomenclature included therein, as described below. Currently, the National List under Section 205.605(b) provides for the use of SAPP, “for use only as a leavening agent.” This Petition requests an additional use for this substance, namely as a sequestrant to maintain the appearance of cooked and uncooked fruits and vegetables. Item B: (1) COMMON NAME Sodium Acid Pyrophosphate: (OTHER NAMES: Disodium Pyrophosphate; Disodium Dihydrogen Pyrophosphate; Acid Sodium Pyrophosphate; Disodium Diphosphate). (2) CONTACT INFORMATION This Petition is submitted by the International Food Additives Council (IFAC), an international association representing manufacturers and suppliers of high quality substances used worldwide as food ingredients. In particular, IFAC’s Phosphates Committee is comprised of domestic and global suppliers of phosphates, used worldwide in food products. The information contained in this Petition was compiled using information provided by the IFAC Phosphates Committee members. Contact Information: Lyn O’Brien Nabors President International Food Additives Council 1100 Johnson Ferry Road Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30342 Phone: 404-252-3663 Fax: 404-252-0774 Email: [email protected] (3) INTENDED USE OF THE SUBSTANCE As stated above, the purpose of this Petition is to add another use, in addition to leavening in baked goods, for this substance, namely as a sequestrant on cooked or uncooked produce to maintain the appearance and texture of these foods.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent Office 3,372,990 Patented Mar
    United States Patent Office 3,372,990 Patented Mar. 12, 1968 2 3,372,990 contains an alkali nitrate, or ammonium nitrate and this CYCLIC PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING Solution is introduced at the inlet of the oxidiser; a second HYDROGEN PEROXDE injection can be made at the outlet of the oxidiser. Michel Charret, Champ-sur-Drac, France, assignor to The process of the invention increases the hydrogen Oxysynthese, Paris, France peroxide production capacity by improving the oxidation No Drawing. Fied Mar. 26, 1965, Ser. No. 443,092 yield and by reducing decomposition of the oxidised phase Claims priority, application France, Apr. 16, 1964, in the oxidiser through stabilisation of this oxidised 971,147, Patent No. 1,405,861 phase. The introduction of disodium phosphate and am 7 Claims. (C. 23-207) monium nitrate into the working solution at the inlet of 0. the oxidiser performs this double role. ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE It has been found taht injection of an aqueous solution of disodium phosphate and ammonium nitrate into the The present disclosure relates to a process for manu working solution at the outlet of the oxidiser completely facturing hydrogen peroxide by reducing a quinone com inhibited corrosion of the aluminium equipment and pound and oxidizing the resultant hydroquinone com pipelines situated behind the oxidiser. pound, and separating the hydrogen peroxide formed. Furthermore, the process of the invention offers a new The process involves the introduction into the working and equally appreciable advantage in that it reduces the solution of an aqueous solution of an acid pyrophosphate carbon content of the hydrogen peroxide extracted.
    [Show full text]