Transatlantic Flight Times and Climate Change

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transatlantic Flight Times and Climate Change Environ. Res. Lett. 11 (2016) 024008 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/2/024008 LETTER Transatlantic flight times and climate change OPEN ACCESS Paul D Williams1 RECEIVED Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK 24 November 2015 1 Address for correspondence: Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG66BB, UK. REVISED 11 January 2016 E-mail: [email protected] ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION Keywords: aircraft, aviation, climate impacts, flight routes, jet stream, journey times 12 January 2016 PUBLISHED 10 February 2016 Abstract Original content from this Aircraft do not fly through a vacuum, but through an atmosphere whose meteorological work may be used under the terms of the Creative characteristics are changing because of global warming. The impacts of aviation on climate change Commons Attribution 3.0 have long been recognised, but the impacts of climate change on aviation have only recently begun to licence. fi Any further distribution of emerge. These impacts include intensi ed turbulence and increased take-off weight restrictions. Here this work must maintain we investigate the influence of climate change on flight routes and journey times. We feed synthetic attribution to the author(s) and the title of atmospheric wind fields generated from climate model simulations into a routing algorithm of the the work, journal citation fl fl and DOI. type used operationally by ight planners. We focus on transatlantic ights between London and New York, and how they change when the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide is doubled. We find that a strengthening of the prevailing jet-stream winds causes eastbound flights to significantly shorten and westbound flights to significantly lengthen in all seasons. Eastbound and westbound crossings in winter become approximately twice as likely to take under 5 h20 min and over 7h00 min, respectively. For reasons that are explained using a conceptual model, the eastbound shortening and westbound lengthening do not cancel out, causing round-trip journey times to increase. Even assuming no future growth in aviation, the extrapolation of our results to all transatlantic traffic suggests that aircraft will collectively be airborne for an extra 2000 h each year, burning an extra 7.2 million gallons of jet fuel at a cost of US$ 22 million, and emitting an extra 70 million kg of carbon dioxide, which is equivalent to the annual emissions of 7100 average British homes. Our results provide further evidence of the two-way interaction between aviation and climate change. 1. Introduction routes and journey times. This subject has received relatively little attention, but is potentially important It has long been recognised that aviation affects the because of the acute sensitivity of the commercial climate, through the radiative forcing associated with aviation sector to fuel costs (Karnauskas et al 2015). greenhouse-gas emissions and contrails (Stuber The route between two airports that minimises the et al 2006, Lee et al 2009). However, it is becoming distance travelled is the great circle, which is the sphe- increasingly clear that the interaction is two-way and rical equivalent of a straight line. However, it is more that climate change has important consequences for economical to minimise the journey time than the dis- aviation. For example, stronger mid-latitude wind tance travelled. For this reason, aircraft routinely devi- shears in the upper troposphere and lower strato- ate from the great circle route in a carefully optimised sphere appear to be destabilising the atmosphere and manner, to benefit from tailwinds or avoid headwinds causing clear-air turbulence to intensify (Williams and (Lunnon and Marklow 1992). The day-to-day varia- Joshi 2013). At ground level, warmer air reduces the bility of flight routes and journey times is therefore lift force on the wings of departing aircraft and appears dictated by the horizontal wind field in the atmosphere to be increasing the likelihood of take-off weight (Palopo et al 2010). The inter-annual variability of restrictions (Coffel and Horton 2015). Here we flight routes and journey times between Hawaii and investigate the influence of climate change on flight the continental USA has been found to be caused © 2016 IOP Publishing Ltd Environ. Res. Lett. 11 (2016) 024008 Figure 1. Changing winter winds in the north Atlantic sector. Blue vectors (one per grid point) indicate the horizontal wind field in the atmosphere at the 200 hPa level, averaged over 20 winters (from 1December to 28February) in the GFDLCM2.1 climate model. Panel (a) shows a pre-industrial control simulation and panel (b) shows the equilibrated anomaly in a doubled-CO2 simulation. − Coloured shading indicates the magnitude of the wind vectors in m s 1. The black line indicates the great circle route between New York and London. predominantly by anomalous wind patterns asso- another (Woollings and Blackburn 2012, Haarsma ciated with the El Niño Southern Oscillation and Arc- et al 2013). The strengthening is composed partly of tic Oscillation (Karnauskas et al 2015). Although the changes to the zonal wind field, which are the thermal North Atlantic flight corridor between Europe and wind response to upper tropospheric warming sepa- North America is one of the worldʼs busiest, with rated by a latitudinally sloping tropopause from lower approximately 600 crossings each day (Irvine stratospheric cooling (Lorenz and DeWeaver 2007). et al 2013), little is known about the long-term The strengthening is also composed partly of changes response of transatlantic flight routes and journey to the meridional wind field, which are a consequence times to the wind changes associated with global of changes to the stationary planetary wave structure warming. (Haarsma and Selten 2012, Simpson et al 2016).By The average wintertime jet-stream winds in the projecting the wind vectors in figure 1 onto the great upper troposphere and lower stratosphere of the circle route from New York to London, we calculate north Atlantic sector are generally projected to that the average along-track (tailwind) component of become stronger in response to greenhouse-gas for- the wind field at typical flight cruising altitudes increa- − cing, as shown in figure 1. This strengthening is con- ses by 14.8% from 21.4 to 24.6 m s 1 when the carbon sistent across the current generation of climate dioxide (CO2) concentration is doubled. The early models, although the magnitudes and structures of the stages of this strengthening perhaps contributed to a strengthening vary in detail from one model to well-publicised transatlantic crossing from New York 2 Environ. Res. Lett. 11 (2016) 024008 ⎛ ⎞2 to London on 8 January 2015, which took a record dtround ⎜⎟w dw » 2⎝ ⎠ .4() time of only 5 h16 min because of a strong tailwind tround U w from an unusually fast jet stream (Crilly 2015). The aim of the present study is to perform a For flights between New York and London, we −1 −1 detailed investigation of the influence of climate substitute w = 21.4 ms and d3.2w = ms (see ) = −1 change on flight routes and journey times. The focus is section 1 together with U 250 m s and on transatlantic flights between London and New tround = 12 h to yield a predicted round-trip journey- York, and how they change when the atmospheric time increase of 1 min 35 s. We will return to this analytic result in section 4, to compare it with the concentration of CO2 is doubled. Section 2 illustrates predictions of an alternative approach that is more the important concepts in a simple model, which is rigorous but computationally expensive. approximate but has the benefit of yielding analytic predictions. Section 3 pursues a more comprehensive treatment, by feeding synthetic atmospheric wind 3. Minimum-time routes fields generated from climate model simulations into a routing algorithm of the type used operationally by The conceptual model presented in section 2 is a flight planners. Section 4 concludes the paper with a simplification, because in reality the atmospheric statistical analysis and discussion. winds vary in space and time. Determining the fastest route between two points in a given wind field is a 2. Conceptual model mathematical problem in the calculus of variations. The Euler–Lagrange equation reduces to a two-point boundary value problem in time, which was derived in The following conceptual model illustrates the influ- the 1930s for motion in two and three Cartesian ence of wind changes on flight times. Suppose that a dimensions (Zermelo 1930, 1931, Levi-Civita 1931) constant horizontal wind of speed w blows along the and in the 1940s for motion on the surface of a sphere great circle from a western airport to an eastern airport (Arrow 1949). Various algorithms have been devel- a distance d away. Truncated Taylor series expansions oped to solve the problem (Bijlsma 2009, Jardin and show that an aircraft travelling with air speed U w Bryson 2012). The resulting minimum-time (or wind- will incur an eastbound journey time of: optimal) route deviates from the great circle and d therefore covers a greater distance, but the increased teast = Uw+ ground speed resulting from faster tailwinds or slower d ⎛ w w 2 ⎞ headwinds more than compensates. The minimum- »-+⎜11⎟ () U ⎝ U U 2 ⎠ time route is optimal in the sense that it would be flown in a completely unrestrained system without and a westbound journey time of: adverse weather, turbulence (Kim et al 2015), climate impact considerations (Sridhar et al 2011, Irvine d et al 2013), or air traffic control constraints. Despite twest = Uw- these restrictions, the evidence is that actual filed flight d ⎛ w w 2 ⎞ routes do lie reasonably close to the minimum-time »++⎜1.2⎟ () U ⎝ U U 2 ⎠ routes (Palopo et al 2010), which also minimise the fuel cost.
Recommended publications
  • SWOT Analysis
    WESTJET&PRODUCT&STRATEGY! TEAM%B:%BRAZEN%BILLIONAIRES% ALEX%GREENE% ANDREW%BARR% BRIAN%TANG% MKTG%1102%–%SET%1F% ELYSIA%LAM% ANNE%MARIE%WEBB=HUGHES% MALISHA%VIRK% 10/16/2014% PAIGE%APPENHIEMER% ! Table of Contents Introduction*............................................................................................................................................*1* Marketing*Challenge*............................................................................................................................*1* Key*Findings*...........................................................................................................................................*1* Current*State*.....................................................................................................................................................*1! Sustainability*(CSR)*........................................................................................................................................*1! Market*Trends*..................................................................................................................................................*2! Shares/Stocks*...................................................................................................................................................*2! Unique*Selling*Proposition*..........................................................................................................................*2! Awards*................................................................................................................................................................*3!
    [Show full text]
  • Episode 6, NC-4: First Across the Atlantic, Pensacola, Florida and Hammondsport, NY
    Episode 6, NC-4: First Across the Atlantic, Pensacola, Florida and Hammondsport, NY Elyse Luray: Our first story examines a swatch of fabric which may be from one of history’s most forgotten milestones: the world's first transatlantic flight. May 17th, 1919. The Portuguese Azores. Men in whaling ships watched the sea for their prey, harpoons at the ready. But on this morning, they make an unexpected and otherworldly sighting. A huge gray flying machine emerges from the fog, making a roar unlike anything they have ever heard before. Six American airmen ride 20,000 pounds of wood, metal, fabric and fuel, and plunge gently into the bay, ending the flight of the NC-4. It was journey many had thought impossible. For the first time, men had flown from America to Europe, crossing the vast Atlantic Ocean. But strangely, while their voyage was eight years before Charles Lindbergh's flight, few Americans have ever heard of the NC-4. Almost 90 years later, a woman from Saratoga, California, has an unusual family heirloom that she believes was a part of this milestone in aviation history. I'm Elyse Luray and I’m on my way to meet Shelly and hear her story. Hi. Shelly: Hi Elyse. Elyse: Nice to meet you. Shelly: Come on in. Elyse: So is this something that has always been in your family? Shelly: Yeah. It was passed down from my grandparents. Here it is. Elyse: Okay. So this is the fabric. Wow! It's in wonderful condition. Shelly: Yeah, it's been in the envelope for years and years.
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2014 Irene Kwan and Daniel Rutherford, Ph.D
    NOVEMBER 2015 TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2014 IRENE KWAN AND DANIEL RUTHERFORD, PH.D. BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Anastasia Kharina, Xiaoli Mao, Guozhen Li, Bill Hem- mings, Vera Pardee, Benjamin Jullien, Tim Johnson, and Dimitri Simos for their review of this document and overall support for the project. We would also like to thank Professor Bo Zou (University of Illinois at Chicago) for his contribution to statistical analyses included in the report. This study was funded through the generous support of the Oak and ClimateWorks Foundations. International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW, Suite 900 Washington DC 20005 USA [email protected] | www.theicct.org © 2015 International Council on Clean Transportation TaBLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ iii 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Airline selection .................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Fuel burn modeling .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Early Developments in Commercial Flight
    LESSON 3 Early Developments in Commercial Flight HARLES A. LINDBERGH was one of many Quick Write young men and women learning to fl y C in 1922. He toured as a wing walker and parachutist in a barnstorming act, and then as a pilot. He joined the Charles Lindbergh did not have modern navigation Army in 1924 and graduated fi rst in his fl ying class equipment or another in 1925, but did not receive a regular commission. pilot when he made his He joined the Army Reserve and returned to civilian famous New York-to-Paris fl ight. After reading the life. He then spent a year as a pilot for the new story about his fl ight across airmail service. the Atlantic Ocean, name three things that make In September 1926 he decided to try to fl y across this solo fl ight a historical the Atlantic. He had his eye on the Orteig prize— accomplishment. $25,000 for the fi rst pilot to fl y solo nonstop from New York City to Paris, France. Lindbergh knew that other pilots were after the same prize, so he moved fast. He had $2,000 of his own Learn About savings, plus $13,000 he’d collected from businessmen • why Charles Lindbergh’s in St. Louis. He struck a deal with Ryan Aircraft Inc. contribution to aviation to build him a plane. He wanted a high-wing became famous monoplane with a single air-cooled 220-horsepower • the signifi cance of Wright Whirlwind engine. Amelia Earhart’s transatlantic fl ights Just 60 days after the contract was signed, Ryan • how early developments delivered the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2014
    FACT SHEET: U.S. AND EUROPE NOVEMBER 2015 [email protected] WWW.THEICCT.ORG TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2014 A new report by the International Council on Clean Transportation compares the top 20 airlines on transatlantic routes in terms of fuel efficiency (i.e., carbon intensity) in 2014. ICELAND KEF FINLAND 5 SWEDEN 1 9 NORWAY LABRADOR OSL SEA 14 ESTONIA DENMARK NORTH A 8 E LATVIA SEA S UNITED SVO 2 IC KINGDOM CPH LT LITHUANIA 6 BA 2 17 RUSSIA 16 19 2 NETHERLANDS BELARUS DUB AMS 12 POLAND 19 LHR GERMANY 17 IRELAND BELGIUM DUS FRA CZECH REP. UKRAINE CDG SLOVAKIA CANADA 14 FRANCE ZRH HUNGARY AUSTRIA MOLDOVA SWITZ. 12 ROMANIA 9 YYZ 9 ITALY BLACK SEA ORD DTW BOS 6 GEORGIA FCO IST EWR JFK MAD ARMENIA PORTUGAL TURKEY SPAIN GREECE UNITED STATES CYPRUS MALTA SYRIA CLT TUNISIA IRAQ LEBANON NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN MEDITERRANEAN SEA MOROCCO WEST BANK ISRAEL JORDAN KUWA kg CO2 per ALGERIA kg CO2 per SAUDI ARABIA R E Rank Airline Airport pair pax-km/L round-trip itinerary Rank WESTERNAirline Airport pair pax-km/LLIBYAround-trip itinerary D EGYPT S SAHARA E A 1 JFK & OSL 42 720 9 CDG & JFK 32 930 CUBA & & 2 DOMINICAN DUS JFK 36 840 12 FCO JFK 31 1100 HAITI REP. MAURITANIA MALI JAMAICA NIGER EMALA BELIZE 2 AMS & JFK 36 830 12 JFK & ZRH 31 1000 CHAD ERITREA HONDURAS CAPE VERDE CARIBBEAN SEA & 36 720 SENEGAL & EL SALVADOR NICARAGUA 2 DUB JFK 14GAMBIA BURKINCLTA FRA 30 1200 SUDAN DJIBOUTI GUINEA-BISSAU GUINEA NIGERIA & &BENI N COSTA RICA 5 JFK SVO 35 1100 14 CPH EWR 30 1000 CÔTE GHANA VENEZUELA D'IVOIRE PANAMA TOGO CENTRAL SIERRA LEONE AFRICAN REPUBLIC ETHIOPIA 6 ISTGUYANA & JFK 34 1200 16 LHR & ORD CAMEROON29 1100 FRENCH GUIANA LIBERIA SURINAME COLOMBIA & & 6 AMS DTW 34 1000 17 JFK LHR 28 1000 UGANDA SÃO TOMÉ AND PRINCIPE EQUAT.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-04-835 Transatlantic Aviation
    United States Government Accountability Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters July 2004 TRANSATLANTIC AVIATION Effects of Easing Restrictions on U.S.-European Markets a GAO-04-835 July 2004 TRANSATLANTIC AVIATION Effects of Easing Restrictions on U.S.- Highlights of GAO-04-835, a report to European Markets congressional requesters Transatlantic airline operations Open Skies agreements have benefited airlines and consumers. Airlines between the United States and benefited by being able to create integrated alliances with foreign airlines. European Union (EU) nations are Through such alliances, airlines connected their networks with that of their currently governed by bilateral partner’s (e.g., by code-sharing agreements), expanded the number of cities agreements that are specific to the they could serve, and increased passenger traffic. Consumers benefited by United States and each EU country. Since 1992, the United States has being able to reach more destinations with this “on-line” service, and from signed so-called “Open Skies” additional competition and lower prices. GAO’s analysis found that travelers agreements with 15 of the 25 EU have a choice of competitors in the majority of the combinations of U.S.-EU countries. A “nationality clause” in destinations (such as Kansas City-Berlin). each agreement allows only those airlines designated by the signatory The Court of Justice decision could alter commercial aviation in four key countries to participate in their ways. First, it would essentially create one Open Skies agreement for the transatlantic markets. United States and EU, thereby extending U.S. airline access to markets that are now restricted under traditional bilateral agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Airship's Potential for Intertheater and Intratheater Airlift
    ii DISCLAIMER This thesis was produced in the Department of Defense school environment in the interest of academic freedom and the advancement of national defense-related concepts. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United States Air Force. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page Logistics Flow During The Gulf War 1 Introduction 1 Strategic lift Phasing 4 Transportation/Support Modes 8 Mobility Studies 16 Summary 19 Conclusion 23 Notes 24 Filling The Gap: The Airship 28 Prologue 28 Introduction 31 The Airship in History 32 Airship Technology 42 Potential Military Roles 53 Conclusion 68 Epilogue 69 Notes 72 Selected Bibliography 77 iv ABSTRACT This paper asserts there exists a dangerous GAP in US strategic intertheater transportation capabilities, propounds a model describing the GAP, and proposes a solution to the problem. Logistics requirements fall into three broad, overlapping categories: Immediate, Mid- Term, and Sustainment requirements. These categories commence and terminate at different times depending on the theater of operations, with Immediate being the most time sensitive and Sustainment the least. They are: 1. Immediate: War materiel needed as soon as combat forces are inserted into a theater of operations in order to enable them to attain a credible defensive posture. 2. Mid-Term: War materiel, which strengthens in-place forces and permits expansion to higher force levels. 3. Sustainment: War materiel needed to maintain combat operations at the desired tempo. US strategic transport systems divide into two categories: airlift and sealift.
    [Show full text]
  • A Publication of the Southern Museum of Flight Birmingham, Al Historic Happenings
    A PUBLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN MUSEUM OF FLIGHT BIRMINGHAM, AL WWW.SOUTHERNMUSEUMOFFLIGHT.ORG HISTORIC HAPPENINGS Lindbergh & WW2 Lindbergh comes to Birmingham uring WW2, Lindbergh was a key n 1927, Charles Lindbergh's D figure in improving the performance I solo transatlantic flight of the P-38 aircraft. Working as a further sparked public interest civilian contractor in the South Pacific in aviation. Local civic during 1944, he was instrumental in boosters, federal initiatives extending the range of the P-38 through through the Department of improved throttle settings, or engine- Spirit of St. Louis leaning techniques, notably by reducing Commerce, and the creation of the airmail system, combined over Birmingham on engine speed to 1,600 rpm, setting the October 5, 1927 carburetors for auto-lean and flying at with public interest, produced a 185 mph. This reduced the P-38s fuel boom in building airports. consumption to 70 gal/h. Following his sensational first solo flight from New York to Paris in May of 1927, 25-year old Lindbergh embarked on a three month flying tour of the United States. Flying his famous plane, Spirit of St. Louis, he touched down in all 48 states, visited 92 cities, gave 147 speeches, and rode 1,290 miles in parades. Airmail usage exploded overnight as a result, and the public began to view airplanes as a viable means of travel. Lindbergh had several Alabama “connections.” He bought his first plane, a “Jenny,” from Glenn Messer Ground crews had noticed that and perhaps soloed for the first time in this plane. He Lindbergh returned from missions with barnstormed Alabama in 1924, and his father had a more fuel than the other pilots based on half-brother, Augustus, who had worked for Frisco the engine settings he employed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ftllääp Cations Upon Which We Insist
    ' R-34 Fails to Break A WORD TO YOU Giant Cross-Sea Flier at Anchor MEN OF WEALTH Record in Long Flight New York City »Is »greatly »under¬ built. TPHE transatlantic flight of the R-34 assistsin thehirth of What are you doing to relieve does not establish a new record thhi dangerous condition Î for long distance flight by airships of This Company Is making as the lighter-than-air type. The record KRYSTALAK many »building loans as »possible. was made in November. 1917, when HELP US. Every dollar you In¬ the German naval Zeppelin L-59 cov¬ vest In our GUARANTEED FIRST ered 4,500 miles in exactly four days. The giant dirigible later was shot MORTGAGES means that we down in the Otranto Channel, Italy, can make Just so many more with the loss of its entire crew. building loans. BUY NOW, Other notable flights by lighter- EVERY DOLLAR HELPS. than-air machines were: The flight of the British non-rigid The LAWYERS MORTGAGE CO. airship of the "North Sea" type, NS-11, THREE yean ago Drj which early this year made a circuit Milk Company sold of the North Sea for a total distance product in bulk to »bakers, of 1,285 miles without a stop. confectioners and ice cream ¦,$9-,QOOyQOQ The flight of the United States naval product. Now The Dry Milk dirigible C-5 from Montauk, L. L, to makers. is tmmrnis.»«fa.t, temían St. John's, Newfoundland. Planned Advertis¬ Company's problem to The record for a long distance non- Today, make the output keep paca stop flight by a heavier-than-air ma- ing has added housewives to with the demand.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Joint Business
    Factsheet American Airlines, British Airways and Iberia’s Joint Business Making oneworld even better What is the joint business? On October 1, 2010, American Airlines, British Airways and Iberia launched their joint business after receiving approval from regulatory authorities earlier this year. A joint business is made when two or more companies agree to do business in one specific area (in this case between Europe and the US) to provide a specific service and share revenues. The three airlines can now co-operate commercially on flights between the EU, Switzerland and Norway and the US, Canada Key customer benefits that will and Mexico. be introduced over the coming Customers will receive even more benefits than they currently months include: do through the airlines as members of the oneworld alliance, in turn enabling oneworld to compete more strongly with its rival • Access to a broader network alliances across the Atlantic. • More access to cheaper fares • Greater convenience through Specifically, it means more destinations, more flights and coordinated schedules and therefore more fares to choose from. They will experience combined tickets continuous and consistent service excellence irrespective of which of the three airlines they are flying on. • Superior customer experience and service integration What it’s not • FFP consistency and A merger. British Airways’ merger with Iberia later this year is integration separate to the joint business. A merger is the joining together of • Corporate customer benefit two companies to form a single company. from joint sales agreements For British Airways and Iberia, the parent company will be known as International Airlines Group.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zeppelin by Anthony Camilleri
    The Zeppelin by Anthony Camilleri An airship or dirigible is a bouyant aircraf that can be steered and propelled through the air. They stay afloat by means of a cavity filled with gas of lesser density than the surrounding atmosphere. They were the first aircraft to make controlled, powered flight. ZEPPELIN is a type of dirigible, more specifically a type of rigid airship pioneered by German Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin, whose name it derived, in the early 2Q1h century. Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin became interested in constructing a 'dirigible airship' after the Franco-Prussian War of 1870/1871 when he witnessed the use of French balloons during the Siege of Paris. He started working on various designs shortly after leaving the military. He eventually purchased the rights to the designs of Croatian inventor David Schwartz after the inventor died suddenly before successfully flying. His first aircraft drew heavily on Schwartz's design. Due to the outstanding success of the Zeppelin design, the term Zeppelin in casual use came to refer to all rigid airships. Construction of the first Zeppelin airship, th LZ1 (for "Luftschiff (Airship) Zeppelin'') began in 1899 and the first experimental flight occurred on 2nd July, 1900 over the Bodensee, in the Bay of Manzell, Friedrichshafen lasting only 18 minutes. Many more airships followed and these were used for passenger transport and military purposes. The DELAG (Deutsch Luftschiffahrt -AG) which can be considered the first commercial airline, served scheduled flights well before World War I and after the outbreak of the conflict, the German Military made extensive use of Zeppelins as bombers and scouts.
    [Show full text]
  • HM Airship R100
    HM Airship R100 HM Airship R100 was a privately designed and built rigid airship, part of a competition to develop new techniques for a projected larger commercial airship for use on British Empire routes. The other airship, the R101, was built by the Air Ministry. Both projects were funded by the British Government. First flight On December 16, 1929, the R100 made its maiden flight from the Royal Naval Air Station in Howden, Yorkshire, where it had been built by a subsidiary of Vickers-Armstrong. It initially flew to York and then continued on to Cardington, Bedfordshire, where the Government Airship Establishment was located. On January 16, 1930, the R100 achieved a speed of 81 mph (130 km/h), making it the fastest airship in the world. The R100 at the mooring mast in Bedforshire Transatlantic Voyage to Canada Originally the R100's contract required a demonstration flight to India. However, the decision to use gasoline engines, rather than the diesel engines originally specified prompted a change in destination to Canada as it was reasoned that a gasoline-powered flight to the tropics was deemed to be too dangerous. Once the R100 was formally handed over to the Air Ministry, a number of modifications were made in preparation for her transatlantic flight. During her last flight the tail fairing had collapsed due to aerodynamic pressures and her pointed tail was modified to a more rounded form, shortening her length by 15 ft (4.6 m). The English airship R100 on mooring mast in St Hubert, Quebec The R100 departed for Canada on July 29, 1930, arriving in Saint-Hubert, Quebec 78 hours later, having flown 3,300 mi (5,300 km) at an average speed of 42 mph (68 km/h).
    [Show full text]