Verview the Magazine for British Airways Shareholders
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SWOT Analysis
WESTJET&PRODUCT&STRATEGY! TEAM%B:%BRAZEN%BILLIONAIRES% ALEX%GREENE% ANDREW%BARR% BRIAN%TANG% MKTG%1102%–%SET%1F% ELYSIA%LAM% ANNE%MARIE%WEBB=HUGHES% MALISHA%VIRK% 10/16/2014% PAIGE%APPENHIEMER% ! Table of Contents Introduction*............................................................................................................................................*1* Marketing*Challenge*............................................................................................................................*1* Key*Findings*...........................................................................................................................................*1* Current*State*.....................................................................................................................................................*1! Sustainability*(CSR)*........................................................................................................................................*1! Market*Trends*..................................................................................................................................................*2! Shares/Stocks*...................................................................................................................................................*2! Unique*Selling*Proposition*..........................................................................................................................*2! Awards*................................................................................................................................................................*3! -
Corporate Governance in This Section
Corporate governance In this section Corporate Governance 54 Chairman’s introduction to Corporate governance 56 Board of Directors 58 Corporate governance 69 Report of the Audit and Compliance Committee 72 Report of the Nominations Committee 75 Report of the Safety Committee 76 Report of the Remuneration Committee INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2016 Strategic report Strategic “ 2016 has really tested the Group. governance Corporate However, the quality of our brands, our core management allied with IAG’s unique structure are our key assets to face these Financial statements head-winds. The Board remains enthusiastic and confident about the future.” information Additional Antonio Vázquez Chairman In compliance with the Financial Reporting Council’s UK Corporate Governance Code, the company has prepared the Corporate Governance Report that follows. www.iairgroup.com 54 Chairman’s introduction to corporate governance An efficient Board support that creates value “The IAG Board continues to evolve in important ways and in a challenging economic and political environment over the last 12 months has proved itself to be highly effective in supporting the Group’s management and adding value.” Antonio Vázquez Chairman The main role of the Board of Directors is to supervise the During the year Sir Martin Broughton stepped down as Deputy Group’s day-to-day management, helping them to create a Chairman and Senior Independent Director, having served for profitable and sustainable business and to maximise the value six years on the IAG Board and 10 years at British Airways. He is of the Company for the long term. succeeded by Patrick Cescau as Senior Independent Director. -
Episode 6, NC-4: First Across the Atlantic, Pensacola, Florida and Hammondsport, NY
Episode 6, NC-4: First Across the Atlantic, Pensacola, Florida and Hammondsport, NY Elyse Luray: Our first story examines a swatch of fabric which may be from one of history’s most forgotten milestones: the world's first transatlantic flight. May 17th, 1919. The Portuguese Azores. Men in whaling ships watched the sea for their prey, harpoons at the ready. But on this morning, they make an unexpected and otherworldly sighting. A huge gray flying machine emerges from the fog, making a roar unlike anything they have ever heard before. Six American airmen ride 20,000 pounds of wood, metal, fabric and fuel, and plunge gently into the bay, ending the flight of the NC-4. It was journey many had thought impossible. For the first time, men had flown from America to Europe, crossing the vast Atlantic Ocean. But strangely, while their voyage was eight years before Charles Lindbergh's flight, few Americans have ever heard of the NC-4. Almost 90 years later, a woman from Saratoga, California, has an unusual family heirloom that she believes was a part of this milestone in aviation history. I'm Elyse Luray and I’m on my way to meet Shelly and hear her story. Hi. Shelly: Hi Elyse. Elyse: Nice to meet you. Shelly: Come on in. Elyse: So is this something that has always been in your family? Shelly: Yeah. It was passed down from my grandparents. Here it is. Elyse: Okay. So this is the fabric. Wow! It's in wonderful condition. Shelly: Yeah, it's been in the envelope for years and years. -
Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2014 Irene Kwan and Daniel Rutherford, Ph.D
NOVEMBER 2015 TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2014 IRENE KWAN AND DANIEL RUTHERFORD, PH.D. BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Anastasia Kharina, Xiaoli Mao, Guozhen Li, Bill Hem- mings, Vera Pardee, Benjamin Jullien, Tim Johnson, and Dimitri Simos for their review of this document and overall support for the project. We would also like to thank Professor Bo Zou (University of Illinois at Chicago) for his contribution to statistical analyses included in the report. This study was funded through the generous support of the Oak and ClimateWorks Foundations. International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW, Suite 900 Washington DC 20005 USA [email protected] | www.theicct.org © 2015 International Council on Clean Transportation TaBLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ iii 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Airline selection .................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Fuel burn modeling ......................................................................................................................... -
Early Developments in Commercial Flight
LESSON 3 Early Developments in Commercial Flight HARLES A. LINDBERGH was one of many Quick Write young men and women learning to fl y C in 1922. He toured as a wing walker and parachutist in a barnstorming act, and then as a pilot. He joined the Charles Lindbergh did not have modern navigation Army in 1924 and graduated fi rst in his fl ying class equipment or another in 1925, but did not receive a regular commission. pilot when he made his He joined the Army Reserve and returned to civilian famous New York-to-Paris fl ight. After reading the life. He then spent a year as a pilot for the new story about his fl ight across airmail service. the Atlantic Ocean, name three things that make In September 1926 he decided to try to fl y across this solo fl ight a historical the Atlantic. He had his eye on the Orteig prize— accomplishment. $25,000 for the fi rst pilot to fl y solo nonstop from New York City to Paris, France. Lindbergh knew that other pilots were after the same prize, so he moved fast. He had $2,000 of his own Learn About savings, plus $13,000 he’d collected from businessmen • why Charles Lindbergh’s in St. Louis. He struck a deal with Ryan Aircraft Inc. contribution to aviation to build him a plane. He wanted a high-wing became famous monoplane with a single air-cooled 220-horsepower • the signifi cance of Wright Whirlwind engine. Amelia Earhart’s transatlantic fl ights Just 60 days after the contract was signed, Ryan • how early developments delivered the aircraft. -
British Airways Plc Annual Report and Accounts Year Ended 31
British Airways Plc Annual Report and Accounts Year ended 31 December 2013 British Airways Plc Company registration number : 1777777 Contents Officers and professional advisers 1 Strategic and directors’ reports Strategic report Management review 2 Financial review 5 Principal risks and uncertainties 8 Directors’ report 10 Directors’ responsibilities statement in relation to the financial statements 12 Independent auditors’ report 13 Group financial statements Group consolidated income statement 14 Group statement of other comprehensive income 15 Balance sheets 16 Cash flow statements 17 Statements of changes in equity 18 Notes to the accounts 19 Operating and financial statistics 68 Fleet table 69 Principal investments 70 Glossary 71 Subsidiary undertakings 72 British Airways Plc Officers and professional advisers Directors Keith Williams (Executive Chairman) Alison Reed (Deputy Chairman) Nick Swift (Chief Financial Officer) Andrew Crawley Frank van der Post Ken Smart Gavin Patterson Garrett Copeland Julia Simpson Secretary Andrew Fleming Registered office Waterside PO Box 365 Harmondsworth UB7 0GB Parent company International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. Calle Velázquez 130 Madrid, 28006 Spain Independent auditors Ernst & Young LLP 1 More London Place London SE1 2AF 1 BBAA AAR&AR&A 22013013 AA4.indd4.indd 1 003/03/20143/03/2014 16:3416:34 Strategic report The Directors present their strategic report for the year ended 31 December 2013. British Airways (‘BA’ or ‘the Group’) is the UK’s largest international scheduled airline and one of the world’s leading global premium airlines. The Group’s principal place of business is London with significant presence at Heathrow, Gatwick and London City airports. Operating one of the most extensive international scheduled airline networks, together with its joint business agreements, code share and franchise partners, BA flies to more than 400 destinations worldwide. -
Lord Marshall of Knightsbridge 1933-2012 Lord Marshall of Knightsbridge by 1976, Marshall Was Appointed President and Chief Executive
The magazine for everyone in British Airways Special Edition Lord Marshall of Knightsbridge 1933-2012 Lord Marshall of Knightsbridge By 1976, Marshall was appointed president and chief executive. As chief executive of British Airways in the early 1980s, Lord Marshall Reaching the top rung of the US corporate ladder was a remarkable of Knightsbridge led the state-owned corporation into successful achievement for a British executive at that time – one that led the way private ownership, placing UK civil aviation at the competitive forefront for others in later decades. of world air transport. By 1980, Marshall was a prized business asset and was being He went on to lead the airline for a total of 21 years and is probably headhunted by several major corporations. In the end, he was attracted most closely associated with BA. Yet, Lord Marshall had already made by an offer to return to the UK with Sears Holdings, the giant retail his name as an outstanding entrepreneur in North America and around group, in readiness to become chief executive. the world and went on to be recognised as one of Britain’s few, Under Margaret Thatcher’s premiership, Britain had a new business internationally-acclaimed business leaders. edge, with free-market sights set on state-owned industries including Described as a ‘business polymath’, his career embraced an air transport and plans to wholly privatise BA were passed in the Civil extraordinary range of major companies in many different sectors. Lord Aviation Act of 1980. It was an inauspicious time for such a move. The Marshall also devoted much time and expertise to public service duties, world was in the grip of recession which had serious effects on the especially championing British interests around the world, notably airline industry. -
Fact Sheet: Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2014
FACT SHEET: U.S. AND EUROPE NOVEMBER 2015 [email protected] WWW.THEICCT.ORG TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2014 A new report by the International Council on Clean Transportation compares the top 20 airlines on transatlantic routes in terms of fuel efficiency (i.e., carbon intensity) in 2014. ICELAND KEF FINLAND 5 SWEDEN 1 9 NORWAY LABRADOR OSL SEA 14 ESTONIA DENMARK NORTH A 8 E LATVIA SEA S UNITED SVO 2 IC KINGDOM CPH LT LITHUANIA 6 BA 2 17 RUSSIA 16 19 2 NETHERLANDS BELARUS DUB AMS 12 POLAND 19 LHR GERMANY 17 IRELAND BELGIUM DUS FRA CZECH REP. UKRAINE CDG SLOVAKIA CANADA 14 FRANCE ZRH HUNGARY AUSTRIA MOLDOVA SWITZ. 12 ROMANIA 9 YYZ 9 ITALY BLACK SEA ORD DTW BOS 6 GEORGIA FCO IST EWR JFK MAD ARMENIA PORTUGAL TURKEY SPAIN GREECE UNITED STATES CYPRUS MALTA SYRIA CLT TUNISIA IRAQ LEBANON NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN MEDITERRANEAN SEA MOROCCO WEST BANK ISRAEL JORDAN KUWA kg CO2 per ALGERIA kg CO2 per SAUDI ARABIA R E Rank Airline Airport pair pax-km/L round-trip itinerary Rank WESTERNAirline Airport pair pax-km/LLIBYAround-trip itinerary D EGYPT S SAHARA E A 1 JFK & OSL 42 720 9 CDG & JFK 32 930 CUBA & & 2 DOMINICAN DUS JFK 36 840 12 FCO JFK 31 1100 HAITI REP. MAURITANIA MALI JAMAICA NIGER EMALA BELIZE 2 AMS & JFK 36 830 12 JFK & ZRH 31 1000 CHAD ERITREA HONDURAS CAPE VERDE CARIBBEAN SEA & 36 720 SENEGAL & EL SALVADOR NICARAGUA 2 DUB JFK 14GAMBIA BURKINCLTA FRA 30 1200 SUDAN DJIBOUTI GUINEA-BISSAU GUINEA NIGERIA & &BENI N COSTA RICA 5 JFK SVO 35 1100 14 CPH EWR 30 1000 CÔTE GHANA VENEZUELA D'IVOIRE PANAMA TOGO CENTRAL SIERRA LEONE AFRICAN REPUBLIC ETHIOPIA 6 ISTGUYANA & JFK 34 1200 16 LHR & ORD CAMEROON29 1100 FRENCH GUIANA LIBERIA SURINAME COLOMBIA & & 6 AMS DTW 34 1000 17 JFK LHR 28 1000 UGANDA SÃO TOMÉ AND PRINCIPE EQUAT. -
STRENGTHENING International Airlines Group
INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2013 STRENGTHENING International Airlines Group 2013 Annual Report and Accounts WorldReginfo - 934e378d-e49b-4677-aa26-426a76bd662c Three years after our creation, International Airlines Group (IAG) has continued to STRENGTHEN its position. REVENUE OPERATING PROFIT (before exceptional items) +6.2% at constant €770m currency up €793m 1,000 5 7 20,000 770 18,67 18,11 8 600 485 16,339 14,79 15,000 5 22 13,456 200 3 -910 0 -2 10,000 -200 5,000 -600 0 -1,000 ‘09‘10 ‘11‘12 ‘13 ‘09‘10 ‘11‘12 ‘13 NON-FUEL UNIT COSTS PRODUCTIVITY LOAD FACTOR PASSENGER UNIT REVENUE -2.7% +4.3% +0.5 points +3.7% at constant at constant currency currency This is a measure of how This measures the amount The number of revenue Passenger revenue we manage costs, which of capacity (ASKs) that passenger kilometres flown divided by capacity to a large extent are our employees deliver expressed as a percentage (ASKs). This reflects both under our control. It is on average each year of the number of available the changes in prices we total non-fuel costs divided (ASKs divided by average seat kilometres flown. charge and the change by capacity (Available Seat number of employees). in volume of our sales. Kilometres ‘ASKs’). WorldReginfo - 934e378d-e49b-4677-aa26-426a76bd662c Group overview Governance Financial overview Financial statements Additional information Table of contents 2 Strengthening Financial overview 76 Operating and market environment Group overview 78 Financial review Introduction 88 Risk management and -
GAO-04-835 Transatlantic Aviation
United States Government Accountability Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters July 2004 TRANSATLANTIC AVIATION Effects of Easing Restrictions on U.S.-European Markets a GAO-04-835 July 2004 TRANSATLANTIC AVIATION Effects of Easing Restrictions on U.S.- Highlights of GAO-04-835, a report to European Markets congressional requesters Transatlantic airline operations Open Skies agreements have benefited airlines and consumers. Airlines between the United States and benefited by being able to create integrated alliances with foreign airlines. European Union (EU) nations are Through such alliances, airlines connected their networks with that of their currently governed by bilateral partner’s (e.g., by code-sharing agreements), expanded the number of cities agreements that are specific to the they could serve, and increased passenger traffic. Consumers benefited by United States and each EU country. Since 1992, the United States has being able to reach more destinations with this “on-line” service, and from signed so-called “Open Skies” additional competition and lower prices. GAO’s analysis found that travelers agreements with 15 of the 25 EU have a choice of competitors in the majority of the combinations of U.S.-EU countries. A “nationality clause” in destinations (such as Kansas City-Berlin). each agreement allows only those airlines designated by the signatory The Court of Justice decision could alter commercial aviation in four key countries to participate in their ways. First, it would essentially create one Open Skies agreement for the transatlantic markets. United States and EU, thereby extending U.S. airline access to markets that are now restricted under traditional bilateral agreements. -
Achieving Flexibility Together
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ACHIEVING FLEXIBILITY TOGETHER In compliance with the Financial Reporting Council’s UK Corporate Governance Code, the company has prepared the Corporate Governance Report that follows. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 56 Chairman’s introducion to Corporate governance 58 Board of Directors 60 Corporate governance 69 Report of the Audit and Compliance Committee 72 Report of the Nominations Committee 75 Report of the Safety Committee 76 Report of the Remuneration Committee www.iairgroup.com 55 25/02/2016 12:16 CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION TO TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Throughout this period our approach to governance and the composition and function of the Board have evolved considerably. Above all we have tried to create the right internal governance structure to support our dynamic and highly successful business model, led by a holding company and formed of independent airlines with their own brands and operations. The Group was born as the product of a merger of two companies, with structures inevitably complex due to airline- specific regulations and the particular circumstances of both companies. Since then, the Group has grown to include two new airlines and has evolved as a distinct entity to those originally merged companies. Our job as a Board has been to look progressively at ways to adapt to this new born entity and to its strategy and culture, simplifying the initial structures so that we have the flexibility that this dynamic business needs. I’m “As this report testifies, the last five pleased to report that this work has been largely very successful. years have been a momentous time for Proof of that fact came during the year with the successful International Airlines Group and all its acquisition and integration of Aer Lingus, our fourth operating operating companies and, as you’d expect, airline alongside British Airways, Iberia and Vueling. -
The Airship's Potential for Intertheater and Intratheater Airlift
ii DISCLAIMER This thesis was produced in the Department of Defense school environment in the interest of academic freedom and the advancement of national defense-related concepts. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United States Air Force. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page Logistics Flow During The Gulf War 1 Introduction 1 Strategic lift Phasing 4 Transportation/Support Modes 8 Mobility Studies 16 Summary 19 Conclusion 23 Notes 24 Filling The Gap: The Airship 28 Prologue 28 Introduction 31 The Airship in History 32 Airship Technology 42 Potential Military Roles 53 Conclusion 68 Epilogue 69 Notes 72 Selected Bibliography 77 iv ABSTRACT This paper asserts there exists a dangerous GAP in US strategic intertheater transportation capabilities, propounds a model describing the GAP, and proposes a solution to the problem. Logistics requirements fall into three broad, overlapping categories: Immediate, Mid- Term, and Sustainment requirements. These categories commence and terminate at different times depending on the theater of operations, with Immediate being the most time sensitive and Sustainment the least. They are: 1. Immediate: War materiel needed as soon as combat forces are inserted into a theater of operations in order to enable them to attain a credible defensive posture. 2. Mid-Term: War materiel, which strengthens in-place forces and permits expansion to higher force levels. 3. Sustainment: War materiel needed to maintain combat operations at the desired tempo. US strategic transport systems divide into two categories: airlift and sealift.