DOCSLIB.ORG

Nonindigenous Aquatic and Selected Terrestrial Species of Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nonindigenous Aquatic and Selected Terrestrial Species of Florida Nonindigenous Aquatic and Selected Terrestrial Species of Florida Status, Pathway and Time of Introduction, Present Distribution, and Significant Ecological and Economic Effects James A. McCann LoriN. Arkin James D. Williams National Biological Service Southeastern Biological Science Center 7920 N.W. 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653 1 United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL BIOLOGICAL StlRVE:~ SERVICE November 28, 1995 MEMORANDUM To: Victor Ramey, IFAS, University of Florida From: Center Director, SBSC Subject: Publication of McCann report on Aquatic Nonindigenous Species of Florida Dr. McCann has prepared a very good compilation of information on aquatic nonindigenous species of Florida. The Florida report has gone through an in house peer review process for publication. Due to budget cuts we will not be able to publish it in house. Anyone who can publish this is free to do so. Contents Preface ......... ~........................................ ...... ............. 4 Abstract ..................................................................... 5 Definitions of Terms ............................. .... ....................... 7 Introductions and Survival of Nonindigenous Species in Freshwater Systems ........... 9 Subtropical Climate ................... ................................. 10 Pathways of Introduction ........................................ ........ 10 Industries that Import Nonindigenous Species ................................ 12 Human Population Growth ............................................... 12 Human Interaction with Pests .................. ............ ........... 12 Nonindigenous Diseases and Parasites in Freshwater Systems ....................... 13 N onindigenous Diseases of Plants . 13 N onindigenous Diseases and Parasites of Fishes .............. .. ............... 13 Nonindigenous Diseases of Humans ........................................ 21 Nonindigenous Aquatic and Semi-Aquatic Plants in Freshwater Systems ............. 27 Nonindigenous Aquatic Plants ........ .............. .. ........ ........... 27 Nonindigenous Semi-Aquatic Plants ............................. .... ..... 46 Significant Effects By Nonindigenous Aquatic Plants .......................... 51 Nonbiological Control ofNuisance Plants ................................... 53 Biological Control Agents Other Than Insects .... ........................... 54 Cost ofNonbiological Control of Aquatic Nuisance Plants .. .. ... ... ............ 55 Nonindigenous Aquatic Mollusks ............................................... 59 Nonindigenous Aquatic Insects in Freshwater Systems ............................. 66 Imported Insects for Biological Control Agents of Aquatic Nonindigenous Plant Species ............................... ... .......... 73 Nonindigenous Nonaquatic Insects of Special Interest .......................... 81 Nonindigenous Fishes in Freshwater Systems .................. .. ................. 85 International Trade ofNonindigenous Fish ................. ................. 85 National Trade ofNonindigenous Fishes ................. .... ............. 86 Potential Effects ofNonindigenous Fishes ................................... 87 Tropical Fish Industry in Florida ........................................... 87 Established Nonindigenous Fish Species in Florida ... ........................ 91 Nonindigenous Amphibians and Reptiles .............. ........................ 116 N onindigenous Aquatic Birds ..................... .. ........ ...... ............ 120 Importation ofNonindigenous Birds .......... .. ........................... 120 2 Pathways of Introduction ................................................ 120 Nonindigenous Nonaquatic Birds of Special Interest .......................... 123 Nonindigenous Aquatic Mammals in Freshwater Systems ......................... 126 Nonindigenous Nonaquatic Mammals of High Visibility ........................... 128 Introductions and Survival ofNonindigenous Species in the Marine Environment ..... 132 Nonindigenous Diseases in the Marine Environment .......................... 133 Nonindigenous Euryhaline Plants ......................................... 135 Nonindigenous Euryhaline Invertebrates .................................... 135 Nonindigenous Euryhaline Fishes ......................................... 139 Regulations for the Import of Fishes, Wildlife, Plants, and Insects .................. 142 Nuisance-Plant Regulations .............................................. 142 Regulations for the Control of Fishes and Wildlife ............................ 145 Regulations for the Use of Insects as Biological Control Agents ................. 146 Conclusions ................................................................ 148 Acknowledgments .......................................................... 149 Tables .................................................................... 150 Figures . 181 Cited Literature ............................................................ 183 3 Preface Under the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-646, 104 STAT. 4671, 16 U.S.C. 4701-4741 approved Nov. 29, 1990), the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force was instructed to conduct biological studies of the identification, pathways, and significant effects of the introduced nonindigenous aquatic species in the United States. This, a literature review, is one of the two biological studies that the task force initiated and funded in 1993. We concentrated on the nonindigenous aquatic species of Florida that were revealed by a literature review during September 1993-January 1994. Limited additional1995 references were added to the text during the review and editoring stages. Some information is on high-profile nonaquatic species. When experts were available, unpublished information about some groups of species was also obtained. However, resources were not available to gather new or unpublished information on all species. Recent published reviews were available of fishes (Courtenay et al. 1984, 1986, 1991), plants (Schardt and Schmitz 1990), and insects (Frank and McCoy 1992, 1993). We depended on the reviews and are indebted to W. R. Courtenay Jr., J. H. Frank, and D. C. Schmitz for assistance. No effort was made to include data on insects that immigrated (migrated on their own accord or were unintentionally introduced by humans) into Florida before 1970 because much of the information is scattered, not well documented, open to speculation, and beyond the scope of this study. Gathering and updating information on most ofthe other groups was impossible because of shortness of time and lack of sufficient resources. We hope that the updating of the information on the status of nonindigenous species in Florida will be continued and that similar documents will be prepared for other states. Knowledge of the pathways of introduction is critical for the development of methods to stop the introduction and establishment of nonindigenous nuisance species while allowing the wise use of beneficial nonindigenous species. 4 Abstract A literature review of the nonindigenous aquatic species introduced into Florida determined that at least 19 plant, 6 mollusk, 38 insect (including species that were imported as biological control agents), 83 fish, 2 amphibian, 1 reptile, 3 bird, 1 mammal, and 1 crab species and an unknown number of pathogens and parasites have been introduced into Florida. Nineteen species of exotic aquatic plants are established in Florida. Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticilata), water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes), and alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) are the major problem species, requiring significant annual expenditures for control. The Asian Clam (Corbicula) is among the 6 species of freshwater mollusks that were introduced and are established in Florida. There have been 12 migrations or unintentional introductions of aquatic insects into Florida and 27 importations of insects for evaluation as biological control agents of aquatic nuisance species. Of these, 14 species have been released and 4 are still under evaluation. Twenty-three exotic tropical fish species and 1 temperate exotic fish species have become established. The populations of 11 are expanding, and populations of 12 are locally established. The blue tilapia (Tilapia aurea), walking catfish (Clarias batrachus), black acara (Cichlasoma bimaculatum), and blackchin tilapia (Tilopia melanopleura) are the most widely spread exotic fish species. The marine toad (Bufo marinus), and Cuban treefrog ( Osteopilus septentrionalis), spectacled caiman (Caiman crocodilus), muscovy duck (Cairina moschata), and the nutria (Myocastor coypus) were released or escaped and became established. The culture of tropical, exotic plants and animals supports a large aquaculture industry in Florida, which has historically been responsible for the release of many species into the wild. However, the rate of introductions through this pathway has been reduced in recent years. The harmful and beneficial ecological and economic effects of these introductions are not well documented. The major pathways of unofficial introductions of fishes include escape or release from fish farms, intentional release of species to support established populations for a sport or commercial fishery, and disposal of unwanted pet aquarium fishes. Only two fish species, the peacock cichlid (Cichla ocellaris) and the speckled pavon (Cichla temensis), were studied before being officially released
Load more

Recommended publications
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Aquatic Biodiversity in the Lake Victoria Basin
    A Study on Aquatic Biodiversity in the Lake Victoria Basin EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY LAKE VICTORIA BASIN COMMISSION A Study on Aquatic Biodiversity in the Lake Victoria Basin © Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC) Lake Victoria Basin Commission P.O. Box 1510 Kisumu, Kenya African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTS) P.O. Box 459178-00100 Nairobi, Kenya Printed and bound in Kenya by: Eyedentity Ltd. P.O. Box 20760-00100 Nairobi, Kenya Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A Study on Aquatic Biodiversity in the Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya: ACTS Press, African Centre for Technology Studies, Lake Victoria Basin Commission, 2011 ISBN 9966-41153-4 This report cannot be reproduced in any form for commercial purposes. However, it can be reproduced and/or translated for educational use provided that the Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC) is acknowledged as the original publisher and provided that a copy of the new version is received by Lake Victoria Basin Commission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Copyright i ACRONYMS iii FOREWORD v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vi 1. BACKGROUND 1 1.1. The Lake Victoria Basin and Its Aquatic Resources 1 1.2. The Lake Victoria Basin Commission 1 1.3. Justification for the Study 2 1.4. Previous efforts to develop Database on Lake Victoria 3 1.5. Global perspective of biodiversity 4 1.6. The Purpose, Objectives and Expected Outputs of the study 5 2. METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSMENT OF BIODIVERSITY 5 2.1. Introduction 5 2.2. Data collection formats 7 2.3. Data Formats for Socio-Economic Values 10 2.5. Data Formats on Institutions and Experts 11 2.6.
    [Show full text]
  • EVENT! NEWSLETTER EXCHANGE KWAS to The
    The Official Newsletter of the Ottawa Valley Aquarium Society Currents BIOLOGICAL APPROACHto AQUASCAPING EARTH DAY EVENT! NEWSLETTER EXCHANGE KWAS to the RESCUE! ...and MORE! Pictures CLUB of the year! NEWS JAN-FEB 2012 “Patrick S” OVAS FORUM PICTURE OF THE YEAR IT’S A 3-WAY TIE! “jojo621” “Chubs” 2 Ottawa Valley Aquarium Society • OVAS.CA “Patrick S” THE FIRST SPLASH appy New Year to all OVASians! I wish you all Ha very successful and fun-filled year in your aquaristic endeavours! For those of you thinking of becoming an OVAS club member, January is good time to join. Membership prices are discounted as we approach the half-way mark of the 2011-12 season. There are still many events to enjoy: our monthly meetings, the annual Giant Auction, our first ever Earth Day Event, and the end-of-year pig roast. We look forward to seeing newcomers take part in our live community of aquarium and pond enthusiasts! The first issue of the year hasn’t quite turned out as I had planned. My work and home schedule have been pretty hectic these past weeks, so I wasn’t able to finish two of our regular columns: “Meet the OVASians” and “Getting to know... (one of our sponsors)”. My apologies – I will make up for it in March! However, we have a great contribution from Joe Schwartz, our club’s Vice President. He has provided us with a well documented and informative article entitled “Biological Approach to Aquascaping”. The picture that graces the cover is of Joe’s 180 gallon planted tank.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies
    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics and layout by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-23-9 ISSN 0194-4088 06 05 04 03 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies. p. cm. -- (Task force report, ISSN 0194-4088 ; no. 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-887383-23-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. II. Series: Task force report (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) ; no. 140. SB950.I4573 2003 632'.9--dc21 2003006389 Task Force Report No. 140 June 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa, USA Task Force Members Kenneth R. Barker (Chair), Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Esther Day, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, Illinois Timothy J. Gibb, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Maud A. Hinchee, ArborGen, Summerville, South Carolina Nancy C. Hinkle, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens Barry J. Jacobsen, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman James Knight, Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman Kenneth A. Langeland, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville Evan Nebeker, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State David A. Rosenberger, Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University–Hudson Valley Laboratory, High- land, New York Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • ANA PAULA MIRANDA MUNDIM POMBO Aedes Aegypti
    ANA PAULA MIRANDA MUNDIM POMBO Aedes aegypti: morfologia, morfometria do ovo, desenvolvimento embrionário e aspectos relacionados à vigilância entomológica no Município de São Paulo São Paulo 2016 ANA PAULA MIRANDA MUNDIM POMBO Aedes aegypti: morfologia, morfometria do ovo, desenvolvimento embrionário e aspectos relacionados à vigilância entomológica no Município de São Paulo Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Anatomia dos Animais Domésticos e Silvestres da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências. Departamento: Cirurgia Área de concentração: Anatomia dos Animais Domésticos e Silvestres Orientador: Profa. Dra. Maria Angélica Miglino De acordo:_____________________ Orientador São Paulo 2016 Autorizo a reprodução parcial ou total desta obra, para fins acadêmicos, desde que citada a fonte. DADOS INTERNACIONAIS DE CATALOGAÇÃO NA PUBLICAÇÃO (Biblioteca Virginie Buff D’Ápice da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo) T.3421 Pombo, Ana Paula Miranda Mundim FMVZ Aedes aegypti : Morfologia, morfometria do ovo, desenvolvimento embrionário e aspectos relacionados à vigilância entomológica no Município de São Paulo / Ana Paula Miranda Mundim Pombo. -- 2016. 133 f. : il. Tese (Doutorado) - Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. Departamento de Cirurgia, São Paulo, 2016. Programa de Pós-Graduação: Anatomia dos Animais Domésticos e Silvestres. Área de concentração: Anatomia dos Animais Domésticos
    [Show full text]
  • Siluriformes: Callichthyidae) in the Subterranean Domain of Northern and Northeastern Brazil
    13 4 297 Tencatt et al NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 13 (4): 297–303 https://doi.org/10.15560/13.4.297 First report of armored catfishes Callichthyinae Bonaparte, 1838 (Siluriformes: Callichthyidae) in the subterranean domain of northern and northeastern Brazil Luiz Fernando Caserta Tencatt,1 Bruno Ferreira dos Santos,2 Maria Elina Bichuette3 1 Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Coleção Ictiológica do Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura e Programa de Pós- Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Av. Colombo, 5790, 87020-900 Maringá, Paraná, Brazil. 2 Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Av. Costa e Silva, 79070-900 Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. 3 Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva, Laboratório de Estudos Subterrâneos, Rodovia Washington Luis, km 235, 13565-905 São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil. Corresponding author: Luiz Fernando Caserta Tencatt, [email protected] Abstract The first occurrence of the armored catfishes of the subfamily Callichthynae is reported in subterranean water bodies of northern and northeastern Brazil. The records include 3 species, each occurring in 1 of the 3 caves in the central and northeastern regions of Brazil: Callichthys callichthys from Casa do Caboclo cave, Sergipe state; Hoplosternum lit- torale from the Gruna da Lagoa do Meio, Bahia state; and Megalechis thoracata, from Casa de Pedra cave, Tocantins state. Keywords Camboatá, cave, hypogean habitat, karstic areas, Neotropical region. Academic editor: Bárbara Calegari | Received 2 March 2017 | Accepted 10 June 2017 | Published 14 August 2017 Citation: Tencatt LFC, Ferreira dos Santos B, Bichuette ME (2017) First report of armored catfishes Callichthyinae( Bonaparte, 1838) (Siluriformes: Callichthyidae) in the subterranean domain.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 ASEAN-FEN 9Th International Fisheries Symposium BOOK of ABSTRACTS
    2019 ASEAN-FEN 9th International Fisheries Symposium BOOK OF ABSTRACTS A New Horizon in Fisheries and Aquaculture Through Education, Research and Innovation 18-21 November 2019 Seri Pacific Hotel Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Contents Oral Session Location… .................................................................... 1 Poster Session ...................................................................................... 2 Special Session… ................................................................................ 3 Special Session 1: ....................................................................... 4 Special Session 2: ..................................................................... 10 Special Session 3: ..................................................................... 16 Oral Presentation… ......................................................................... 26 Session 1: Fisheries Biology and Resource Management 1 ………………………………………………………………….…...27 Session 2: Fisheries Biology and Resource Management 2 …………………………………………………………...........….…62 Session 3: Nutrition and Feed........................................................ 107 Session 4: Aquatic Animal Health ................................................ 146 Session 5: Fisheries Socio-economies, Gender, Extension and Education… ..................................................................................... 196 Session 6: Information Technology and Engineering .................. 213 Session 7: Postharvest, Fish Products and Food Safety… ......... 219 Session
    [Show full text]
  • Review on Major Parasitic Crustacean in Fish Kidanie Misganaw and Addis Getu* Department of Animal Production and Extension, University of Gondar, P.O
    Aquacu nd ltu a r e s e J i o r u e r h n s a i Misganaw and Getu, Fish Aquac J 2016, 7:3 l F Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal ISSN: 2150-3508 DOI: 10.4172/2150-3508.1000175 Review Open Access Review on Major Parasitic Crustacean in Fish Kidanie Misganaw and Addis Getu* Department of Animal Production and Extension, University of Gondar, P.O. Box: 196, Gondar, Ethiopia *Corresponding author: Addis Getu, Faculty of Veterinary, Department of Animal Production and Extension, Medicine, University of Gondar, P.O. Box: 196, Gondar, Ethiopia, Tel: +251588119078, +251918651093; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: 04 December, 2014; Accepted date: 26 July, 2016; Published date: 02 August, 2016 Copyright: © 2016 Misganaw K, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract In this paper the major description, epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical sign, diagnosis, treatment and control of parasitic crustaceans in fish has been reviewed. The major crustaceans parasites commonly encountered in cultured and wild fish are: copepods (ergasilidea and lernaeidae), branchiura (argulidae) and isopods). Members of the branchiura and isopod are relatively large and both sexes are parasitic, while copepods are the most common crustacean parasites are generally small to microscopic with both free-living and parasitic stages in their life cycle. These parasitic crustaceans are numerous and have worldwide distribution in fresh, brackish and salt water. Most of them can be seen with naked eyes as they attach to the gills, bodies and fins of the host.
    [Show full text]
  • DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) by ULTRA STRUCTURE MICROGRAPHS of EGGS by B
    Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, Vol.44, No.1, April 2014 J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. (JESP), 44(1), 2014: 71 – 77 DISTINGUISHING THE TWO FORMS OF EGYPTIAN AEDES (OCHLEROTATUS) CASPIUS PALIAS SPECIES (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) BY ULTRA STRUCTURE MICROGRAPHS OF EGGS By B. A. SOLIMAN1, N. M. WASSIM1, AND J. R. LINLEY2 Department of Zoology1, Suez University, Suez, Egypt and Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory2, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, USA. Abstract Ultrastructure of the two forms autogenous and anautogenous eggs of Aedes (Ochlerotatus ) caspius of Egypt are described using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The eggs of the two forms are slightly boat shape with quite difference in width. Chorionic cells of the ventral surface are ultimately different in both forms in shape, width of reticulum , number and size of tubercles. The chorionic cells of the autogenous form's egg are elongate, narrow and almost curved with unusually wide, outer reticulum contain 2 - 13 large tubercles along with a few number in small size. However, the anautogenous form's egg , the chorionic cells of the ventral surface fairly distinct, very regular in outline with thin reticulum and usually hexagonal, each cell contain one or two large tubercles with many small scattered peripheral tubercles. Fine structure micrographic work of eggs of the Egyptian Ae. caspius provides new morphological evidence that both autogenous and unautogenous forms are certainly different and suggests that those forms are two distinct species. Key Words: Mosquitoes, Aedes caspius, Eggs, Scanning Electron Microscope. Introduction a group of two distinct species. They had Aedes caspius Pallas is a widely been identified as an autogenous, distributed in the Palaearctic Region where stenogamous form inhabiting brackish water its larvae were primarily halophytic, with breeding sites in coastal and inland desert occasional occurrence in fresh water areas, while an anautogenous, eurygamous (Horsfall, 1955).
    [Show full text]
  • OJIOS1990019004003.Pdf
    Odonalologica 19(4): 359-3(6 December I, 1990 Odonata associated with water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.) in South Florida R.L. L.B. L.P. Lounibos, Escher, Dewald N. Nishimura and V.L. Larson Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, University of Florida, 200 9th St SE, Vero Beach, Florida 32962, United States Received April 10, 1990 / Accepted May 7, 1990 lettuce Larval Odon. were identified from quantitative samples of water made from 3 of but less a single pond. spp. Zygoptera accounted for more individuals biomass than 4 spp. of Anisoptera.Numbers oflarvae werehighestin the winter when smallest size classes predominated, and lowest in the spring and summer when larger size classes were present. Size class data indicated a probable spring emergence for and and autumnal Telebasis byersi Pachydiplax longipennis an emergence for Coryphaeschna adnexa. Foregut dissections of freshly caught larvae revealed iden- tifiable remains ofcertain prey, the commonest being larvae ofMansonia mosquitoes which attach to roots of P. stratiotes. INTRODUCTION The cosmotropical macrophyte Pistia stratiotes L. is known to be an important for insect life nursery aquatic (DUNN, 1934; MACFIE & INGRAM, 1923). insect found in Among orders on P. stratiotes Volta Lake, Ghana, larval Odonata dominatedin biomass and were second to Diptera in absolute numbers of five (PETR, 1968). Representatives at least genera of Anisoptera and three genera of Zygoptera were recovered during Petr’s ten-month study. Larval accounted for times biomass Anisoptera approximately ten more thanZygoptera on Volta Lake, but DRAY et al. (1988) reported that dragonfly larvae were relatively uncommon on water lettuce in Florida. The of present paper represents a portion a two-year study undertaken to identify the aquatic insect fauna on water lettuce at one locality and to describe the relationship between mosquitoes of the genus Mansonia, other membersof the insect community, and growth of this host plant (LOUNIBOS & DEWALD, 360 L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • FOTAS Fish Tales 05.4
    In this issue: 3 The Future of the Fed- eration of Texas Aquarium Societies Greg Steeves 8 FOTAS BAP 17 FOTAS HAP 24 FOTAS CARES Greg Steeves 25 Spawning the Buffalo- Volume 5 Issue 4 head Cichlid The FOTAS Fish Tales is a quarterly publication of the Federation of Texas Duc Nguyen Aquarium Societies a non-profit organization. The views and opinions contained within are not necessarily those of the editors and/or the officers 27 GloFish, Love them or and members of the Federation of Texas Aquarium Societies. Hate them, They are here to stay! FOTAS Fish Tales Editor: Gerald Griffin [email protected] Gerald Griffin Fish Tales Submission Guidelines 31 What the Heck is an ESU? Articles: Leslie Dick Please submit all articles in electronic form. We can accept most popular software formats and fonts. Email to [email protected]. Photos and 35 Spawning Julido- graphics are encouraged with your articles! Please remember to include the photo/graphic credits. Graphics and photo files may be submitted in chromis dickfieldi any format, however uncompressed TIFF, JPEG or vector format is pre- Gerald Griffin ferred, at the highest resolution/file size possible. If you need help with graphics files or your file is too large to email, please contact me for alterna- 37 Meet the San Antonio tive submission info. Aquatic Plant Club Art Submission: Chris Lewis Graphics and photo files may be submitted in any format. However, uncom- pressed TIFF, JPEG or vector formats are preferred. Please submit the 39 Participating in the FO- highest resolution possible. TAS BAP and HAP Next deadline…… Gerald Griffin January 15th 2016 On the Cover: COPYRIGHT NOTICE GloFish - Photos by York- All Rights Reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme and Book of Abstracts
    MONDAY SEPTEMBER 17 19 MANAGING INVASIVE PLANTS IN AUSTRALIA: A DECADE OF ACHIEVEMENT McFadyen R Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management, Indooroopilly, Brisbane Qld The first Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) for Weeds started in 1995 and the National Weeds Strategy was launched in 1997. The first national eradication campaign against an invasive plant started in 1994, and a ‘Permitted List’ system was adopted in 1998 for entry of new plant species into Australia, using a Weed Risk Assessment System. These were major advances in the management of invasive plants in Australia, and this paper discusses the critical policy issues and turning points along the way. It also considers where policy has failed and the critical challenges for the future. 20 21 CURRENT AND POTENTIAL GEOPHYTE WEEDS OF SOUTH-WESTERN AUSTRALIA Keighery GJ Department of Environment and Conservation, Science Division, Wanneroo, WA [email protected] South Western Australia is an internationally recognised biodiversity hotspot for flowering plants, containing over 6,000 species of which 75% are endemic. Altered land use since European settlement has lead to 1234 naturalised plants becoming established. These now pose a major threat to this biodiversity. Unlike SE Australia shrubs are a minor component of this weed flora, major weeds are grasses, annuals (Peas, Daisies and Brassicaceae) or geophytes. The 107 geophytic weeds present in Western Australia come from 18 families of plants, both Monocots and Dicots, although nearly half are cormous Iridaceae from southern Africa. Unlike many other areas of similar climates, Southern Western Australia is depauperate in geophytes, with about 200 species in our flora of c.
    [Show full text]