Programme and Book of Abstracts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Programme and Book of Abstracts MONDAY SEPTEMBER 17 19 MANAGING INVASIVE PLANTS IN AUSTRALIA: A DECADE OF ACHIEVEMENT McFadyen R Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management, Indooroopilly, Brisbane Qld The first Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) for Weeds started in 1995 and the National Weeds Strategy was launched in 1997. The first national eradication campaign against an invasive plant started in 1994, and a ‘Permitted List’ system was adopted in 1998 for entry of new plant species into Australia, using a Weed Risk Assessment System. These were major advances in the management of invasive plants in Australia, and this paper discusses the critical policy issues and turning points along the way. It also considers where policy has failed and the critical challenges for the future. 20 21 CURRENT AND POTENTIAL GEOPHYTE WEEDS OF SOUTH-WESTERN AUSTRALIA Keighery GJ Department of Environment and Conservation, Science Division, Wanneroo, WA [email protected] South Western Australia is an internationally recognised biodiversity hotspot for flowering plants, containing over 6,000 species of which 75% are endemic. Altered land use since European settlement has lead to 1234 naturalised plants becoming established. These now pose a major threat to this biodiversity. Unlike SE Australia shrubs are a minor component of this weed flora, major weeds are grasses, annuals (Peas, Daisies and Brassicaceae) or geophytes. The 107 geophytic weeds present in Western Australia come from 18 families of plants, both Monocots and Dicots, although nearly half are cormous Iridaceae from southern Africa. Unlike many other areas of similar climates, Southern Western Australia is depauperate in geophytes, with about 200 species in our flora of c. 6,000 (< 4%), compared to southern Africa with 1500 (17%). Most geophytes in WA are Tuberous Orchids, compared to other regions where true bulbs or corms predominate. The “worst” geophytic weeds are from the Hyacinthaceae (Lachenalia), Araceae (Zantedeschia), Asparagaceae (Asparagus), Iridaceae (Babiana, Freesia, Gladiolus, Moraea, Romulea, Sparaxis and Watsonia) and the Oxalidaceae (Oxalis). A wide variety of common and rare habitats are seriously impacted by these species. Virtually all geophytic weeds are confined to the south west, especially around Perth where 98 species have been recorded. Most of these weeds are still actively expanding their ranges. There are currently none recorded for the Kimberley or Desert regions of Western Australia. However, numerous species occur overseas in similar climates and several are locally naturalised on offshore islands (Cocos and Christmas). Since nearly all these weeds were introduced as ornamentals we must be aware that many highly desirable species not yet commonly cultivated are potentially weedy. Although there are many potential geophytic weeds in North and South America, Asia and Africa, trade and horticultural links to these regions have been rare in the past. We need to be alert to new introductions of such geophytes, especially where such weeds are currently absent. Another major priority is preventing continuing spread and impact of established serious geophytic weeds in southern Western Australia. 20 21 THE IMPORTANCE OF HUMAN MEDIATION IN SPECIES ESTABLISHMENT: ANALYSIS OF ALIEN FLORA OF ESTONIA (NORTH-EUROPE) Ööpik M, Kull T Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Riia Str. 181, 51014 Tartu, Estonia Widely appreciated approach to explain mechanisms of crossing invasion phases uses analyses of alien species databases of certain recipient territory. We compiled a comprehensive list of alien species ever recorded in Estonian vegetation using various data sources: herbarium specimens, vegetation inventories etc. We expected that deliberately introduced species (pre and after introduction selected, repeatedly escaped from cultivation) have advantages in passing the reproductive and environmental barriers. The database consists of 787 neophytes from 87 families. We estimated invasive status of each species and differentiated species according to the mode of introduction (accidental versus deliberate, Figure 1). We also added species biological and ecological data for analysis. Figure 1. Herbaceous perennials show higher probability to achieve wider distribution than short-lived species. The pattern in achieved invasive status differs significantly between accidentally introduced (a) and deliberate species (b), and depends obviously on whether a species is a long-lived or not. Almost 70% of all alien species achieve only rare distribution but those species which originate from deliberate introduction tend to become more spread compared to accidentally introduced ones. Pre-selected perennial species escaping from cultivation have better opportunities to pass different barriers and naturalise especially in (semi-) natural communities. We shall discuss the alien flora also in respect of residence time in Estonia. 22 23 A RARE SUCCESS STORY FROM NEW ZEALAND: NO NEW AGRICULTURAL WEEDS FOR MANY YEARS! Williams PA1, Popay AI2, Gatehouse HA3, Healy AJ4 1Landcare Research, Nelson; 2Department of Conservation, Hamilton; 3Bioprotection and Ecology Division, Lincoln University, Lincoln; 498 Rattray Street, Riccarton, Christchurch [email protected] New Zealand has gained an international reputation for its efforts in controlling weeds, especially for the potential impact of recent biosecurity legislation. There is, however, little information on how effective past legislation has been in managing existing weeds and preventing the invasion of new ones. We seem to delight in demonstrating the rising number of newly naturalised exotics. But all of these new weeds are problems in environmental habitats, and it is many years since any new agricultural weeds appeared. Most of our agricultural weeds were introduced in the early days of New Zealand’s European settlement and the number of newly declared species declined considerably from about 1970 onwards. Some of the reasons for this may have been the more stringent regulations of the 1978 Noxious Plants Act (including enhanced surveillance for new species and quicker action in containing them), but other reasons may include gradually improvements of controls of the purity of imported agricultural seed, greater care in preventing the importation of potentially dangerous plant species, increasingly effective seed cleaning equipment and better weed control practices. We describe the patterns of importation, and details of the legislation dealing with invasive alien weeds. We discuss the effective containment of potentially serious agricultural weeds like nassella tussock, cape tulip and Johnson grass, and the probable effects of improved import and seed purity standards. 22 23 GLOBAL INVASIVE SPECIES INFORMATION NETWORK: DEVELOPING A PILOT SYSTEM TO SHARE INVASIVE SPECIES CHECKLIST INFORMATION GLOBALLY Sellers E1, Graham J2, Simpson A1, Browne M3 1US National Biological Information Infrastructure, 2Colorado State University-Ft. Collins, USA, 3Invasive Species Specialist Group, New Zealand. [email protected] The transport, translocation, and introduction of invasive alien species (IAS) are issues of global concern. Successful early detection, prevention, and management of IAS and their impacts on the environment require global cooperation on IAS information exchange. The Global Invasive Species Information Network (GISIN) was proposed at the 6th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), The Hague, 2002. It is a network of IAS researchers, experts, information managers, and computer scientists sharing knowledge and experience, adopting standards and protocols for information exchange, and increasing availability of IAS information at local, national, regional, and global levels. In 2004, experts from 26 countries attended the first GISIN meeting to establish goals and a Steering Committee to move the network forward. In 2005 a Web site was established for the GISIN <http://www.gisinetwork.org> and an extensible markup language (XML) schema for invasive species profiles was developed with support from the CBD Secretariat. The schema will establish a standard method for global IAS information exchange and cross- search of unconnected databases. In 2006 a Taxonomic Databases Working Group (TDWG) Invasive Species Information Systems interest group was formed in order to take the draft Invasive Alien Species Profile Schema through a formal standards adoption process. In 2007, the GISIN, the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), and TDWG are developing a prototype Web system to share invasive species checklist information among diverse types of online information systems, in order to prevent and/or manage incipient invasions. The enclosed figure is a representation of the pilot system. Related products (in brief) that members of the GISIN plan to produce: • Tools for implementation of a data registry and cross search using a standard protocol • Improved Invasive Alien Species Profile Schema for standardized species pages • Interactive maps of existing invasions • Predictive models of potential invasions Keywords: invasive alien species, IAS, invasive species, invasives, alien species, exotic species, introduced species, bioinvaders, cyberinfrastructure, biological informatics, information exchange, databases, information systems, Internet, global invasive species information network, GISIN, extensible markup language, XML, information
Recommended publications
  • Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies
    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics and layout by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-23-9 ISSN 0194-4088 06 05 04 03 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies. p. cm. -- (Task force report, ISSN 0194-4088 ; no. 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-887383-23-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. II. Series: Task force report (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) ; no. 140. SB950.I4573 2003 632'.9--dc21 2003006389 Task Force Report No. 140 June 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa, USA Task Force Members Kenneth R. Barker (Chair), Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Esther Day, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, Illinois Timothy J. Gibb, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Maud A. Hinchee, ArborGen, Summerville, South Carolina Nancy C. Hinkle, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens Barry J. Jacobsen, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman James Knight, Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman Kenneth A. Langeland, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville Evan Nebeker, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State David A. Rosenberger, Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University–Hudson Valley Laboratory, High- land, New York Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Agenda
    Meeting Sponsors The Aquatic Plant Management Society appreciates the generous support of the following meeting sponsors. Through their support and contributions, we can conduct a successful and enjoyable meeting. Platinum Level UPL NA Inc. King of Prussia, Pennsylvania Gold Level Alligare, LLC SePRO Davidson, North Carolina Carmel, Indiana Bronze Level Brewer International Nufarm Americas Nutrien Solutions Brandt Vero Beach, Florida Raleigh, North Carolina Loveland, Colorado Springfield, Illinois Contributor Level Aquatic Control Chem One Seymour, Indiana Houston, Texas APMS Board of Directors Ryan Wersal Mark Heilman Ryan Thum President Immediate Past President President Elect Minnesota State University, Mankato SePRO Corporation Montana State University Mankato, MN Carmel, IN Bozeman, MT Brett Hartis Justin Nawrocki Jason Ferrell Vice President Treasurer (1/3) Editor (2/3) Duke Energy Carolinas UPL NA Inc. University of Florida Huntersville, NC Holly Springs, NC Gainesville, Florida Amy Giannotti Marc Bellaud Amy Ferriter Secretary (1/3) Director (3/3) Director (3/3) AquaSTEM Consulting SOLitude Lake Management Nutrien Solutions Winter Park, FL Shrewsbury, MA Gainesville, FL Lyn Gettys Chris Mudge Michael Greer Director (2/3) Director (2/3) Director (1/3) University of Florida USA ERDC-EEA/LSU US Army Corps of Engineers Davie, FL Baton Rouge, LA Buffalo, NY Erika Haug Gregory Chorak Director (1/3) Student Director North Carolina State University Montana State University Raleigh, NC Bozeman, MT Committee Chairs Special Representatives
    [Show full text]
  • EPPO Reporting Service
    ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN ET MEDITERRANEENNE PLANT PROTECTION POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES ORGANIZATION OEPP Service d'information NO. 10 PARIS, 2007-10-01 SOMMAIRE ________________________________________________________________ Ravageurs & Maladies 2007/187 - Nouvelles données sur les organismes de quarantaine et les organismes nuisibles de la Liste d'Alerte de l'OEPP 2007/188 - Premier signalement de Phytophthora ramorum en Lituanie 2007/189 - Précisions sur la situation de Ceratocystis fimbriata f.sp. platani en Grèce 2007/190 - Premier signalement du Tomato spotted wilt virus en Jordanie 2007/191 - Premier signalement du Tomato infectious chlorosis virus en Jordanie 2007/192 - Squash vein yellowing virus: un nouveau virus des cucurbitacées aux Etats-Unis 2007/193 - Le Cucumber vein yellowing virus n'est plus signalé en France 2007/194 - Phoracantha recurva présent en Italie 2007/195 - Premier signalement de Luperomorpha nigripennis en Italie 2007/196 - Premier signalement d’Aleuroclava guyavae en Italie 2007/197 - Vespa velutina: une nouvelle espèce exotique envahissante trouvée en France 2007/198 - Etudes sur le pear decline à Taïwan 2007/199 - Un nouveau test de PCR en temps réel pour détecter Xylophilus ampelinus 2007/200 - Une clé de diagnostique moléculaire pour identifier sept espèces de Meloidogyne 2007/201 - Rapport de l’OEPP sur les notifications de non-conformité CONTENTS ________________________________________________________________ Plantes envahissantes 2007/202 - Estimations économiques : exemples de Sicyos angulatus et Abutilon theophrasti en Catalunya, Espagne 2007/203 - Plantes exotiques envahissantes – Listes de l'OEPP et documentation 2007/204 - Polygonum perfoliatum dans la région OEPP: addition à la Liste d'Alerte de l'OEPP 2007/205 - Hakea sericea dans la région OEPP: addition à la Liste d'Alerte de l'OEPP 2007/206 - Alternanthera philoxeroides dans la région OEPP: addition à la Liste d'Alerte de l'OEPP 2007/207 - Les pires espèces envahissantes menaçant la biodiversité en Europe 1, rue Le Nôtre Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonindigenous Aquatic and Selected Terrestrial Species of Florida
    Nonindigenous Aquatic and Selected Terrestrial Species of Florida Status, Pathway and Time of Introduction, Present Distribution, and Significant Ecological and Economic Effects James A. McCann LoriN. Arkin James D. Williams National Biological Service Southeastern Biological Science Center 7920 N.W. 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653 1 United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL BIOLOGICAL StlRVE:~ SERVICE November 28, 1995 MEMORANDUM To: Victor Ramey, IFAS, University of Florida From: Center Director, SBSC Subject: Publication of McCann report on Aquatic Nonindigenous Species of Florida Dr. McCann has prepared a very good compilation of information on aquatic nonindigenous species of Florida. The Florida report has gone through an in house peer review process for publication. Due to budget cuts we will not be able to publish it in house. Anyone who can publish this is free to do so. Contents Preface ......... ~........................................ ...... ............. 4 Abstract ..................................................................... 5 Definitions of Terms ............................. .... ....................... 7 Introductions and Survival of Nonindigenous Species in Freshwater Systems ........... 9 Subtropical Climate ................... ................................. 10 Pathways of Introduction ........................................ ........ 10 Industries that Import Nonindigenous Species ................................ 12 Human Population Growth ............................................... 12
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide for the Biological Control of Weeds in Eastern North America
    US Department TECHNOLOGY of Agriculture TRANSFER FIELD GUIDE FOR THE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WEEDS IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA Rachel L. Winston, Carol B. Randall, Bernd Blossey, Philip W. Tipping, Ellen C. Lake, and Judy Hough-Goldstein Forest Health Technology FHTET-2016-04 Enterprise Team April 2017 The Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ Cover photos: Purple loosestrife (Jennifer Andreas, Washington State University Extension), Galerucella calmariensis (David Cappaert, Michigan State University, bugwood.org), tropical soda apple ((J. Jeffrey Mullahey, University of Florida, bugwood.org), Gratiana boliviana (Rodrigo Diaz, Louisiana State University), waterhyacinth (Chris Evans, University of Illinois, bugwood.org), Megamelus scutellaris (Jason D. Stanley, USDA ARS, bugwood.org), mile-a-minute weed (Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, bugwood.org), Rhinoncomimus latipes (Amy Diercks, bugwood.org) How to cite this publication: Winston, R.L., C.B. Randall, B. Blossey, P.W. Tipping, E.C. Lake, and J. Hough-Goldstein. 2017. Field Guide for the Biological Control of Weeds in Eastern North America. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia. FHTET-2016-04. In accordance with
    [Show full text]
  • Insects and Other Arthropods That Feed on Aquatic and Wetland Plants
    Insects and Other United States Arthropods That Feed on Department of Agriculture Aquatic and Wetland Agricultural Research Plants Service Technical Bulletin 1870 October 2002 Cover: Adult salvinia weevils on Salvinia minima United States Department of Agriculture Insects and Other Agricultural Research Arthropods That Feed on Service Technical Aquatic and Wetland Bulletin 1870 Plants Ted D. Center, F. Allen Dray, Jr., Greg P. Jubinsky, and Michael J. Grodowitz Center is research entomologist and Dray is ecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Jubinsky is environmental administrator, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee. Grodowitz is research entomologist, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Abstract Center, T.D., F.A. Dray Jr., G.P. Jubinsky, and M.J. Grodowitz. 1999. Insects and Other Arthropods That Feed on Aquatic and Wetland Plants. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Technical Bulletin No. 1870. Plant-feeding insects play an often unappreciated but important role in the dynamics of aquatic and wetland ecosystems. Natural resource managers, scientists, and others working in such ecosystems need to be able to recognize these insects and the damage they cause. This manual provides photographs and descriptions of the life stages and feeding damage of about 50 of the most common native plant-feeding insects and naturalized biological control insects found in aquatic and wetland ecosystems in the United States. Keywords: Biological control, herbivory, insect-plant interaction, insects, phytophagous, weeds. While supplies last, single copies of this publication can be obtained at no cost from USDA–ARS, Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, 3205 College Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314.
    [Show full text]
  • Management and Control Methods of Invasive Alien Freshwater
    Aquatic Botany 136 (2017) 112–137 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquatic Botany jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aquabot Review Management and control methods of invasive alien freshwater aquatic plants: A review a,b,∗ c d d d e A. Hussner , I. Stiers , M.J.J.M. Verhofstad , E.S. Bakker , B.M.C. Grutters , J. Haury , f g h i j J.L.C.H. van Valkenburg , G. Brundu , J. Newman , J.S. Clayton , L.W.J. Anderson , i D. Hofstra a Institute of Botany, Heinrich-Heine-University, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany b Jackels Umweltdienste GmbH, D-41334 Nettetal, Germany c Plant Biology and Nature Management (APNA), Department of Biology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium d Department of Aquatic Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands e Department of Ecology, UMR ESE, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France f Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, National Reference Centre, P.O. Box 9102, 6700 HC, Wageningen, The Netherlands g Department of Agriculture, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy h Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxon, United Kingdom i National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 11115, Hamilton, New Zealand j Waterweed Solutions, P.O. Box 807, Pt. Reyes Station, CA, 94956, United States a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Introduced invasive alien aquatic plants (IAAPs) threaten ecosystems due to their excessive growth Received 27 April 2016 and have both ecological and economic impacts. To minimize these impacts, effective management of Received in revised form 2 August 2016 IAAPs is required according to national or international laws and regulations (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhrlps BIOCONTROL: OPPORTUNITIES for USE of NATURAL ENEMIES AGAINST the PEAR THRIPS
    rHRlPS BIOCONTROL: OPPORTUNITIES FOR USE OF NATURAL ENEMIES AGAINST THE PEAR THRIPS Nick J. ~ills' Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International Institute of Biological Control Silwood Park Ascot, Berkshire UK Abstract Thrips have been considered as both target pests and control agents in biological control. The main emphasis of this paper concerns the natural enemies of thrips and an appraisal of the potential for biological control of the pear thrips on sugar maple in the northeastern United States. Previous attempts at biological control of thrips pests have been confined to the Caribbean and Hawaii and have made use of eulophid larval parasitoids and anthocorid predators as control agents. A review of the literature indicates that while these two groups often figure most strongly in natural enemy complexes of thrips, fungal pathogens are an important, if neglected, group. For biological control of pear thrips it is considered that synchronized univoltine parasitoids and fungal pathogens from Europe, the region of origin of the pest, show most promise as potential biological control agents. Introduction Biological control has been widely practiced worldwide as an effective means of controlling accidentally introduced pests by the importation and release of specific natural enemies from their region of origin (Clausen 1977, Julien 1987). This approach led to the successful 'current address: Div. of Biological Control, Univ. of Calif., Albany, Calif. control of the cottony cushion scale, lcerya purchasi Maskell in California one hundred years ago through the importation of the Vedalia beetle, Rodolia cardinalis (Mulsant) (Caltagirone & Doutt 1989). While chemical treatments dominated pest management in the post-war years, environmental concerns have brought biological control back to the forefront of current integrated pest management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Weedlist2006.Pdf (/Isc/Abstract/20077202810)
    Citation information Page 1 of 2 (/ISC/) Invasive Species Compendium Detailed coverage of invasive species threatening livelihoods and the environment worldwide Filter by type Search Citation Please cite the Compendium as follows: For the compilation as a whole CABI, current year. Invasive Species Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. www.cabi.org/isc (http://www.cabi.org/isc). For an individual datasheet where authors are attributed in the Contributor section CABI, current year. Fallopia japonica [original text by AN Author]. In: Invasive Species Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. www.cabi.org/isc (http://www.cabi.org/isc). For an individual datasheet where no author is attributed CABI, current year. Fallopia japonica. In: Invasive Species Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. www.cabi.org/isc (http://www.cabi.org/isc). Contact Us (/ISC/contactus) Feedback (https://www.cabi.org/feedback/) Accessibility (https://www.cabi.org/accessibility/ ) Cookies (https://www.cabi.org/cookie-information/ ) Privacy Policy (https://www.cabi.org/privacy-policy/) Terms and conditions (https://www.cabi.org/terms-and-conditions/ ) https://www.cabi.org/ISC/citation 1/27/2019 Citation information Page 2 of 2 © Copyright 2019 CAB International. CABI is a registered EU trademark. https://www.cabi.org/ISC/citation 1/27/2019 4/6/2018 Datasheet report for Alternanthera philoxeroides (alligator weed) Invasive Species Compendium Datasheet report for Alternanthera philoxeroides (alligator weed) Top of page Pictures Picture Title Caption Copyright Leaves and A. philoxeroides is characterized by dark-green waxy leaves, lance-shaped, Bill inflorescence opposite, 12-14 x 1.5-2.5 cm. Inflorescence white, ball-shaped, papery, 1.5 cm in Parsons diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Alligatorweed Thrips (Suggested) Amynothrips Andersoni O'neill (Insecta: Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae)1
    EENY 476 Alligatorweed thrips (suggested) Amynothrips andersoni O’Neill (Insecta: Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae)1 Ted D. Center, James P. Cuda, and Michael J. Grodowitz2 Introduction Carolina, and Texas. Establishment in California has not been confirmed (Center et al. 2002, Grodowitz and Alligatorweed, Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. Whitaker 2005). (Amaranthaceae), is an aquatic weed native to South America that began threatening Florida’s waterways in the early 1900s (Langeland et al. 2008). This rooted perennial herb reproduces vegetatively from stem fragments and forms dense floating mats. The floating mats impede navigation, block drains and water intake valves, reduce light penetration, and displace native species (Langeland et al. 2008). The alligatorweed thrips, Amynothrips andersoni O’Neill, was the second South American natural enemy of this aquatic weed imported into the United States. The al- ligatorweed flea beetle was the first one. The alligatorweed thrips was released in Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and California for biological control of alligatorweed in 1967. Subsequent releases occurred in Texas and Mississippi in 1968 (Center et al. 2002, Grodowitz and Whitaker 2005). Distribution Native to South America, the alligatorweed thrips is Figure 1. A short-winged (brachypterous) adult alligatorweed thrips, Amynothrips andersoni O’Neill established across the southern United States, including Credits: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Vicksburg, MS 1. This document is EENY-476, one of a series of Featured Creatures from the Entomology and Nematology Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Published June 2010. Revised April 2013. This document is also available on Featured Creatures website at http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Alligatorweed Thrips (Suggested Common Name) Amynothrips Andersoni O’Neill (Insecta: Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae)1 Ted D
    EENY 476 Alligatorweed Thrips (Suggested Common Name) Amynothrips andersoni O’Neill (Insecta: Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae)1 Ted D. Center, James P. Cuda, and Michael J. Grodowitz2 Introduction Carolina, and Texas. Establishment in California has not been confirmed (Center et al. 2002; Winston et al. 2017). Alligatorweed, Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. (Amaranthaceae), is an aquatic weed native to South America that began threatening Florida’s waterways in the Description early 1900s (Langeland et al. 2008). This rooted perennial Adults herb reproduces vegetatively from stem fragments and Alligatorweed thrips adults are shiny and black in color. forms dense floating mats. The floating mats impede Females are about 2.1 mm long, whereas males are about navigation, block drains and water intake valves, reduce 1.7 mm long. Two forms exist, a brachypterous (short- light penetration, and displace native species (Langeland et winged) form and a macropterous (long-winged) form. al. 2008). Only the macropterous form is capable of flight (Center et al. 2002; Winston et al. 2017). The alligatorweed thrips, Amynothrips andersoni O’Neill, was the second South American natural enemy of this aquatic weed imported into the United States. The alliga- Eggs torweed flea beetle (https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/in831) was the The eggs are laid singly and are yellowish or amber in color first one. The alligatorweed thrips was released in Florida, when deposited, but turn red as the embryos mature. Egg Georgia, South Carolina, and California for biological development is completed in about seven days (Center et al. control of alligatorweed in 1967. Subsequent releases 2002; Winston et al.
    [Show full text]