DOCSLIB.ORG

Use of Shoulders and Narrow Lanes to Increase Freeway Capacity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Use of Shoulders and Narrow Lanes to Increase Freeway Capacity I NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HI G H W AY RESEARCH PROGRAM I Use of Shoulders and Narrow Lanes to Increase Freeway Capacity Transpo . rtation Research Board National Research Council TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1995 OFFICERS Chair: Lillian C. Borrone, Director, Port Authority, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Vice Chair: James W. VAN Loben Sels, Director, California Department of Transportation Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MWAMERS EDWARD H. ARNOLD, Chair and President, Arnold Industries, Lebanon, PA SHARON D. BANKS, General Manager, AC Transit, Oakland, CA BRIAN J. L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor & Chair, Bruron Centerfor Development Studies, University of Texas at Dallas DWIGHT M. BOWER, Director, Idaho Department of Transportation JOHN E. BREEN, The Nasser L Al-Rashid Chair in Civil Engineering, Tile University of Texas at Austin DAVID BURWELL, President, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy A. RAY CHAMBERLAIN, Vice President, Freight Policy, American Trucking Associations, Inc. (Past Chair, 1993) RAY W. CLOUGH, Nishkian Professor of Structural Engineering, Emeritus, University of California, Berkeley JAMES N. DENN, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Transportation JAMES C. DELONG, Director ofAviation, Denver International Airport, Denver, Colorado DENNIS J. FITZGERALD, Executive Director, Capital District Transportation Authority, Albany, IVY JAMES A. HAGEN, Chairimin of the Board and CEO, CONRAIL DELON HAMPTON, Chairman & CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates LESTER A. HOEL, Hamilton Professor, Civil Engineering, University of Virginia DON C. KELLY, Secretary and Commissioner of Highways, Transportation,Cabiner, Kentucky ROBERT KOCHANOWSKI, Executive Director, Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission JAMES L. LAMMEE, President & CEO. Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. CHARLES P. O'LEARY, JR., Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Transportation JUDE W. P. PATIN, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development CRAIG E. PHILIP, President, Ingram Barge Co., Nashville, 77V DARREL RENSINK, Director, Iowa Department of Transportation JOSEPH M. iUSSMAN, JR East Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering, MIT MARTIN WACHS, Director, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California DAVID N. WORMLEY, Dean of Engineering, Pennsylvania State University HOWARD YERUSALIM, Secretary of Transportation, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation MIKE ACOTT, President, National Asphalt Pavement Association (ex officio) ROY A. ALLEN, Vice President, Research and Test Department, Association ofAmerican Railroads (ex officio) ANDREW H. CARD, JR., President and CEO, American Automobile Manufacturers Association THOMAS J. DONOHUE, President and CEO, American Trucking Associations (ex officio) FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Cifficials (ex officio) JACK R. GILSTRAP, Executive Vice President, American Public Transit Association (ex officio) ALBERT J. HERDERGER, Maritime Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) DAVID R. HINSON, Federal Aviation Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) GORDON J. LINTON, Federal Transit Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) RICARDO MARTINEZ, Federal Railroad Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) JOLENE M. MOLITORIS, Federal Railroad Administrator, US. Department of Transportation (ex officio) DAVE SHARMA, Research and Special Programs Administrator, US. Department of Transportation (ex officio) RODNEY E. SLATER, Federal Highway Administrator. U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) ARTHUR E. WILLIAMS, Chief of Engineers and Commander, US. Army Corps of Engineers (ex officio) NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM Transportation Research Board Executive Committee Subcommittee for NCHR LILLIAN C. BORRONE, Port Authority of New York and New. Jersey (Chair) ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS, American Association of State Highway and RODNEY E. SLATER, Federal Highway Administration Transportation Officials JOSEPH M. SUSSMAN Massachusetts Institute of Technology LESTER A. HOEL, University of Virginia JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS, California Department of Transportation Field of Traffic Area of Operations and Control Project Panel G3-43 RONALD C. SONNTAG, Wisconsin Department of Transportation (Chair) JAMES R. ROBINSON, Federal Highway Administration MICHAEL M. CHRISTENSON, Minnesota Department of Transportation ROGER P. ROESSj Polytechnic University, Brooklyn,, NY ALEX KENNEDY, California Department of Transportation DAVID L. TOLLET7, Federal Highway Administration JEFFREY A. LINDLEY, Federal Highway Administration HENRY LIEU, FHWA Liaison Representative JOHN C. POWERS, New Jersey Department of Transportation RICHARD A. CUNARD, TRB Liaison Representative TIMOTHY R. NEUMAN, CH2M Hill, Chicago, IL Program S ROBERT J. REILLY, Director, Cooperative Research Programs RONALD McCREADY, Senior Program Officer CRAWFORD F. JENCKS, Manager, NCHRP FRANK R. McCULLAGH, Senior Program Officer LLOYD R. CROWTHER, Senior Program Officer KENNETH S. OPIELA, Senior Program Officer B. RAY DERR, Senior Program Officer SCOTT A. SABOL, Senior Program Officer AMIR N. HANNA, Senior Program Officer EILEEN P. DELANEY, Editor KAMI CABRAL, Editorial Assistant NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM Report 369 Use of ShouldersI and Narrow Lanes to Increas le Freeway Capacity J.E. CURREN JHK & Associates Alexandria, VA Subject Areas Highway and Facility Design Highway Operations, Capacity, and Traffic Control Research Sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in Cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1995 NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH NCHRP REPORT 369 PROGRAM Systematic, well-designed research provides the most effective Project 343 FY'91 approach to the solution of many problems facing highway admin- istrators; and engineers. Often, highway problems are of local inter- ISSN 0077-5614 est and can best be studied by highway departments individually ISBN 0-309-05369-2 or in cooperation with their state universities and others. However, the accelerating growth of highway transportation develops in- L. C. Catalog Card No. 94-62110 creasingly complex'problems of wide interest to highway authori- ties. These problems are best studied through a coordinated pro- Price $23.00 gram of cooperative research. In recognition of these needs, the highway administrators of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials initiated in 1962 an objective national highway research program employing modem scientific techniques. This program is supported on a continuing basis by funds from participating member states of the Association and it receives the full cooperation and support of the Federal Highway Administration, United States De- NOTICE partment of Transportation. The project that is the subject of this report was a part of the National Cooperative The Transportation Research Board of the National Research Highway Research Program conducted by the Transportation Research Board with Council was requested by the Association to administer the research the approval of the Governing Board of the National Research Council. Such approval program because of the Board's recognized objectivity and under- reflects the Governing Board's judgment that the program concerned is of national importance and appropriate with respect to both the purposes and resources of the standing of modem research practices. The Board is uniquely suited National Research Council. for this purpose as it maintains an extensive committee structure The members of the technical committee selected to monitor this project and to from which authorities on any highway transportation subject may review this report were chosen for recognized scholarly competence and with due be drawn; it possesses avenues of cormnunications and cooperation consideration for the balance of disciplines appropriate to the project. The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency that performed with federal, state and local governmental agencies, universities, the research, and, while they have been accepted as appropriate by the technical and industry; its relationship to the National Research Council committee, they are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, is an insurance of objectivity; it maintains a full-time research the National Research Council, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation officials, or the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of correlation staff of specialists in highway transportation matters to Transportation. bring the findings of research directly to those who are in a position Each report is reviewed and accepted for publication by the technical committee to use them. according to procedures established and monitored by the Transportation Research Board Executive Committee and the Governing Board of the National Research The program is developed on the basis of research needs identi- Council. fied by chief administrators of the highway and transportation departments and by committees of AASHTO. Each year, specific areas of research needs to be included in the program are proposed to the National Research Council
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interstate 5 Corridor Improvements
    Soundwall construction on northbound I-5, Santa Fe Springs, CA. New abutment for the Alondra Blvd. Bridge in Santa Fe Springs. Construction for the new southbound I-5 o-ramp at Imperial Hwy./Pioneer Blvd. in Norwalk. About the Santa Ana Freeway The Interstate 5 Corridor (Interstate 5) South Corridor Interstate 5 Improvement Projects OF TRAN T SP Improvement Projects EN O Interstate 5 in California is a vital north/south artery R M T T A R T A I O P for the travelling public and it is one of the state’s most E N D Six I-5 South Corridor Improvement Projects, extending U A heavily-used corridors to move goods and services N I C T I Corridor E R 6.7 miles between the Los Angeles County/Orange D E M ST A between the borders of Mexico and Canada. County line to the San Gabriel River Freeway (Interstate ATES OF 605), are identied by their location at Valley View Avenue, Improvements The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Alondra Boulevard, Carmenita Road, Rosecrans Avenue, District 7, serving Los Angeles and Ventura counties, Imperial Highway and Florence Avenue in the cities of I-5 Corridor Improvement Partners and its regional partners, the Los Angeles County La Mirada, Santa Fe Springs, Norwalk and Downey. South Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), are A $1.6 billion investment on the Santa Ana Freeway investing approximately $3 billion in several Interstate includes widening the roadway to add one High I-5 HOV/Florence Avenue Interchange 5 Corridor Improvement Projects, funded through a Occupancy Vehicle (HOV), or carpool lane, and one combination of federal, state and local resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter IV TRANSPORTATION and CIRCULATION
    Chapter IV TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION Central City is bordered by a "freeway ring" formed by the Harbor Freeway (Interstate 110) to the west, the Hollywood Freeway (US 101) to the north, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) to the east, and the Santa Monica Freeway (Interstate 10) to the south. In addition to the freeway ring, five other freeway corridors provide regional access to the downtown area: the Golden State Freeway (Interstate 5), the Glendale Freeway (State Route 2), the Pasadena Freeway (State Route 110), the San Bernardino Freeway (Interstate 10) and the Pomona Freeway (State Route 60). The Downtown roadway system is basically a grid network of streets which has remained unchanged for decades. The majority of the changes that have occurred on these streets have been to convert some segments into one-way operation. Several streets also serve a regional function by providing access to the adjacent freeway system. These include Hope Street, Grand Avenue, Broadway, and Spring Street in the north-south direction and Third Street, Fourth Street, Fifth Street, Sixth Street, Eighth Street, and Ninth Street in the east west direction. Significant congestion occurs on the regional transportation network due to the combined impacts of trip demands within Central City as well as regional trips that pass through Central City. In fact, more than half of downtown freeway traffic is through traffic. Pedestrian circulation in downtown Los Angeles takes place for the most part during the weekday business hours with the heaviest volumes during the lunch hours. Most of the pedestrian movement occurs between Bunker Hill, the Financial Core, and the Historic Core where daytime employment centers are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating Disneyland’S Golden Anniversary
    Celebrating Disneyland’s Golden Anniversary Mickey Mouse and Disneyland Resort President Matt Ouimet are hosting a global party celebrating Disneyland’s 50th anniversary Get Your Kicks With Just One Click. www.anaheim.net Anaheim’s one-stop online calendar is your place for everything happening in the City. Maybe you’re in the mood for a concert at the House of Blues or The Grove, or possibly a game at the Arrowhead Pond. Perhaps you’re planning to see a family show at the Convention Center or you just want to go to a community event sponsored by the City, a local non-profit, or one of Anaheim’s schools. Now there’s one place to get all the info you need...no matter where you’re going in Anaheim. Just log on to the City’s new comprehensive Calendar of Events at www.anaheim.net. And, if you’re an Anaheim-based organization or you’ve got an event taking place in the City, let us know about it. Our Calendar is just one part of a useful city website that has all the information you need for anything related to city operations, pro- grams, services and current events. So visit www.anaheim.net today, where your kicks are just one click away. C ITY OF A NAHEIM www.anaheim.net Features 8 Disneyland at 50 New rides and attractions are part of a global celebration as Anaheim’s most beloved and popular destination turns 50 in a big way. On the Cover 8 13 Through the Decades Mickey Mouse and Disneyland A look at how Disneyland and Anaheim have grown together.
    [Show full text]
  • Dan J. Peterson HC 72 Box 19600 Fish Lake Valley, NV 89010 (775) 572-3349 [email protected]
    Dan J. Peterson HC 72 Box 19600 Fish Lake Valley, NV 89010 (775) 572-3349 [email protected] PROFESSIONAL RESUME SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE ...Twenty-six years Disputes Resolutions, Consultant and Expert Witness to the Construction Industry and Government ...Eighteen years General Contractor ...Ten years Highway Construction Engineer SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS ...Fifty-four years of professional experience and expertise within the Public Sector, including Public and Private Contract Administration, Disputes Resolution Boards and Advisors, Real Estate Development, Construction Estimating, Bidding, Construction Management, Contract Negotiations, Design, Survey and Construction Inspection. ...Proven track record in Management, Construction Planning, Design, Surveying, Construction Estimating, Contractor Auditing, Subcontract Writing & Negotiations and Specification Writing & Interpretation. ...Skilled in interfacing with Government Agencies and Contractors to facilitate efficient construction of many types of projects including bridges, roads, freeways. housing, (individual homes or multiple units) commercial buildings,, canals, dams, ...Extensive experience serving on and participating in several types of Public Service Boards and Committees utilizing a common sense approach to solving conflicts between public requirements and private sector needs. ...Adept in swiftly analyzing construction conflicts and proposing equitable solutions for clients. Page 2 of 11 Resume of Dan J. Peterson PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1990-Present Disputes Resolutions
    [Show full text]
  • “FINISHED” Freeway and Expressway Revolts Excerpt from Wikipedia
    FREEWAYS DO NOT NEED TO BE “FINISHED” Freeway and expressway revolts Excerpt from Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeway_and_expressway_revolts The freeway revolts (sometimes expressway revolts) were a phenomenon encountered in developed countries in the 1960s and 1970s, in which planned freeway construction in many cities was halted due to widespread public opposition; especially of those whose neighborhoods would be disrupted or displaced by the proposed freeways, and due to various other negative effects that freeways are considered to have. Such "revolts" occurred mainly in American cities, such as Baltimore, Boston, Cleveland, Los Angeles, Memphis, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, New Orleans, New York, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, and Washington, D.C. In many cities, there remain unused highways, abruptly-terminating freeway alignments, and short stretches of freeway in the middle of nowhere, all of which are evidence of larger projects which were never completed. In Canada, similar revolts occurred in Vancouver, Toronto, Halifax, and Montreal. Road protest in the United Kingdom occurred since the 1960s, and in Australia protests on a smaller scale occurred later in the 1970s. Background After World War II, there was a major drive to build a freeway network in the United States, including (but not limited to) the Interstate Highway System. Design and construction began in earnest in the 1950s, and many cities (as well as rural areas) were subjected to the bulldozer. However, many of the proposed freeway routes were drawn up without considering local interest; in many cases the construction of the freeway system was considered a regional (or national) issue which trumped local concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • “Disney-Fying” Mother Nature in the Atomic Era: How Disneyland’S Portrayals of Nature Reflected Post-War Ideals of Family, Child-Rearing, and the Home, 1955-1966
    “Disney-fying” Mother Nature in the Atomic Era: How Disneyland’s Portrayals of Nature Reflected Post-War Ideals of Family, Child-Rearing, and the Home, 1955-1966 Angela Hawk Abstract From Tom Sawyer’s Island to the world-famous Jungle Cruise, attractions at the Disneyland theme park in Anaheim, California have long used ideal- ized images of nature to delight visitors. My research explores how these images reflected popular ideals of family at the height of Cold War politics and culture in America. Using a variety of primary and secondary sources, including archived Disney films, newsreel footage, magazine and journal articles, park brochures, employee manuals, and photographs, I have stud- ied Disneyland from its disastrous grand opening in 1955 up to the death of its namesake in 1966. I have discovered that nature was indeed a vital part of the Disneyland presentation and was, moreover, essential to its popularity among American families. Every natural element, from the park’s all-en- compassing earthen berm to the impeccably manicured trees of Main Street U.S.A., served to promote a sense of fantasy and safety that was both psy- chologically comforting to parents with “atomic anxiety” and appropriately stimulating for children raised on the principles of Dr. Benjamin Spock. So potent was this “Disney version” of nature, in fact, that most contempo- raries, rather than criticizing Walt Disney for his dramatic, anthropomor- phic treatments, lauded him for his conservationist attitude. Examining the appeal of the theme park from this perspective provides insight into precise- ly how and why Disneyland became one of the foremost cultural influences of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Report-UEI
    ❖ APPENDICES ❖ APPENDIX D1 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY FOR THE OC LOOP SEGMENTS O, P, AND Q PROJECT ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Sarmad Farjo, Principal, PE, ENV SP GHD 320 Goddard Way, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92618 Prepared by: UltraSystems Environmental Inc. 16431 Scientific Way Irvine, CA 92618 August 2021 Key Words: Coyote Creek Channel; Orange County Public Works; City of Buena Park; City of Cerritos; City of La Palma; City of La Mirada; Los Alamitos, Whittier, La Habra, Calif. USGS 7.5’ topo maps; pedestrian survey; negative findings ❖ CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY ❖ PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY FOR THE OC LOOP SEGMENTS O, P AND Q PROJECT ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Sarmad Farjo, Principal, PE, ENV SP GHD 320 Goddard Way, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92618 Prepared by: Stephen O’Neil, M.A., RPA Megan Black Doukakis, M.A. Lisa Ahn, B.A. UltraSystems Environmental Inc. 16431 Scientific Way Irvine, CA 92618 August 5, 2021 Prepared by: Date: August 5, 2021 Stephen O’Neil, M.A., RPA UltraSystems Environmental Inc. 7034/OC Loop Segments O, P, and Q Project Page i Cultural Resources Inventory August 2021 ❖ TABLE OF CONTENTS ❖ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1964 3 of the Southern Pacific Railroad's Coast Route Restricted Expansion
    ~~2no ~. 35 CALIFORNIA v.43,-rio.3-4 Hi•~ hway s ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ,'r ~~~ ~~ ~. ,~.~ ter, ~ # ~a ~ ,~~ ~~ a,.,+r~, ~~ ~,;~` ..~'AS.~.a_ ~~ ,n ~y w s .. ~ ~ ".~... ~ ~ t,' ~ ~ ~ ~,.°~ .~ ,Y~'~~ ~~ 3 >, ` i Qt left is photo in recent times of old $an Fernando Pass. Walls are remarkably stable. Once atoll road, charges were $2.50 fora 12-horse team, 25 cents fora horse and rider, i0 cents for miscellaneous arrivals, and 4 cents each for sheep. Above and below are pictures of various traffic problems experienced in negoFiating old Newhall Tunnel, which was only 17%z feet wide and 17 feet high at center. Dark, law, and narrow, it was difficult for trucks— virtually aone-way proposition—and fearsome for passenger cars which sometimes turned out heavily on weekends for wildflower viewing or other recreation. EVOLUTION OF A PASS According to the Soutl~er~n Califor- The first automobile went over the niq Historical Society Quarterly, the pass in 1902, an "Autocar" driven by first cut was made in the old San Fer- Los Angeles dealer Ralph Hamlin, ac- nando Pass in 1854 to improve a companied by the new owner from wagon road of sorts, and it was cut McKittrick, who had come by train deeper in 1858 for the Butterfield to piclz up his car. The grade was so Stages. It was further deepened in steep gasoline would not flow to the 1862 by General E. F. Beale, owner carburetor and they had to climb in of the huge Rancho Ted on, who re- reverse, both men leaping out and paired the mute and reopened it as chocking the wheels with rocks each a toll road between the San Fernando time the engine stalled.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Are Also a Number of Areas Within the Project Limits with a High Concentration Of
    07 - LA - 605 - PM 6.36/PM 15.10 07 - LA - 5 - PM 6.39/PM 9.45 07 - LA - 105 – PM 16.14/PM 17.80 Vicinity Map N On Routes Interstate 605 (I-605), Interstate 5 (I-5), and Interstate 105 (I-105) in Los Angeles County I-605 between Excelsior Dr UC (PM 6.36) & south of Rose Hills Rd (PM 15.10) I-5 between Florence Ave (PM 6.39) & north of Paramount Blvd (PM 9.45) I-105 between Columbia Wy (PM 16.14) & I-605 (I-105 PM 17.80) 07 - LA - 605 - PM 6.36/PM 15.10 07 - LA - 5 - PM 6.39/PM 9.45 07 - LA - 105 – PM 16.14/PM 17.80 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................2 2. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................3 3. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................5 4. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT ...............6 Existing and Forecast Traffic Volumes.......................................................12 Safety / Accident Data ................................................................................27 Recommended Design Features ..................................................................33 Traffic Engineering Studies ........................................................................34 Other Traffic Considerations and Coordination ..........................................34 5. DEFICIENCIES ...........................................................................................34 6. CORRIDOR AND SYSTEM COORDINATION......................................35
    [Show full text]
  • California Interstate 5 Exit List
    California Interstate 5 Exit List Interstate 5 Interstate 5 California Numbered FREEWAY INTERCHANGES FREEWAY INTERCHANGES Exit Uniform System SOUTH NORTH County Statewide Both directions (normal text); or, Both directions (normal text); or, Post Mile MILE post Prefix SOUTH only (green italics) EXIT NUMBERS NORTH only ( blue italics ) City (Co PM) (SMP) Proposed Exit Number 380 Shared Alignment (subordinate route noted) Partial Installation (1-post sign, only) 360 360 Rest Area, Vista Point, or Weigh Station Installed Exit Number 359 ( On­freeway facility with SMP reference ­ not an exit ) County Prefix Correction of Exit Number Required ( no text in grey background - - no facility; or, exit on opposite side/direction of freeway ) Oregon - California 796.77 Oregon - California State Border R 68.33 795.81 Hilt Road 796 Hilt Road R 65.52 793.00 Bailey Hill Road 793 Bailey Hill Road R 62.92 790.40 Hornbrook Hwy / Ditch Creek Road 790 Hornbrook Hwy / Ditch Creek Road R 61.55 789.03 Henley / Hornbrook 789 Henley / Hornbrook R 58.33 785.81 SR-96 / Willow Creek / Rest Area 786 SR-96 / Willow Creek / Rest Area R 52.04 779.52 Vista Point 780 R 48.24 755.72 SR-3 / Montague 776 SR-3 / Montague Yreka R 47.56 775.04 Miner St / N foothill Dr 775 Miner St / N foothill Dr R 45.62 773.10 SR-3 / Fort Jones / Etna 773 SR-3 / Yreka / Fort Jones / Etna R 42.51 770.05 Easy Street / Shamrock Road 770 Easy Street / Shamrock Road R 38.21 765.75 Grenada / Gazelle 766 Montague / Grenada R 31.18 758.72 Siskiyou Siskiyou Louie Road 759 Louie Road R 25.89 753.43 Weed
    [Show full text]
  • 518 N Broadway, Santa Ana, CA 92701 HISTORICAL BUILDING
    HISTORICAL BUILDING FOR SALE OR LEASE Offering Memorandum 518 N Broadway, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Property Description Historical Georgian Style Office Building located on a high profile corner adjacent to the Federal and County campus in the Civic Center area of Downtown Santa Ana. SALE PRICE $3,300,000 PRICE PER SF $772.83 OCCUPANCY 0% LEASE LEASE RATE: $13,750 per month $3.22 per sq ft LEASE TYPE: NNN BUILDING BASICS LOCATION 518 N Broadway Santa Ana, CA 92701 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL 398-252-04 ZONING SD-84 (CLICK HERE FOR ZONING INFO) YEAR RENOVATED 1980 BUILDING SIZE 4270 appx sf* LAND SF 28,602 appx sf* STORIES 2 / 2,135 appx sf PARKING SPACES 25 total *Broker does not guarantee the accuracy of square footage, lot size or other information concerning the condition or features of 2 property provided by seller or obtained from public records or other sources, and the buyer is advised to independently verify the accuracy of that information through personal inspection and with appropriate professionals. CONFIDENTIALITY DISCLAIMER The information contained in the following Marketing Brochure is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from Shaw Equity Inc. and Darvishian Investment Group and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of Darvishian Investment Group. This Marketing Brochure has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Action Plan
    Capital Action Plan Status Thru December 2013 Updated: January 21, 2014 Cost Schedule Budget/Forecast Capital Projects Plan/Forecast Begin Complete Begin Complete Construction Advertise Complete (millions) Environmental Environmental Design Design Ready Construction Award Contract Construction Freeway Projects: I-5, Pico to Vista Hermosa $113.0 Jun-09 Dec-11 Jun-11 Oct-13 Feb-14 Oct-14 Jan-15 Feb-18 Project C $110.7 Jun-09 Oct-11 Jun-11 Oct-13 Mar-14 Jul-14 Oct-14 Nov-17 I-5, Vista Hermosa to Pacific Coast Highway $75.6 Jun-09 Dec-11 Jun-11 Feb-13 Jun-13 Oct-13 Dec-13 Mar-17 Project C $75.0 Jun-09 Oct-11 Jun-11 May-13 Aug-13 Feb-14 Jun-14 Mar-17 I-5, Pacific Coast Highway to San Juan Creek Rd. $70.7 Jun-09 Dec-11 Jun-11 Jan-13 May-13 Aug-13 Oct-13 Sep-16 Project C $63.1 Jun-09 Oct-11 Jun-11 Jan-13 Apr-13 Aug-13 Dec-13 Sep-16 I-5, I-5/Ortega Interchange $90.9 Sep-05 Jun-09 Jan-09 Nov-11 Mar-12 Jun-12 Aug-12 Sep-15 Project D $81.0 Sep-05 Jun-09 Jan-09 Dec-11 Apr-12 Jun-12 Aug-12 Sep-15 I-5, I-5/Ortega Interchange (Landscape) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Project D N/A N/A N/A Jul-14 Dec-14 Apr-15 Jun-15 Aug-15 Aug-16 I-5, SR-73 to El Toro Road TBD Sep-11 Jun-14 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Project C & D $525.8 Oct-11 May-14 Sep-14 Oct-17 Apr-18 May-18 Aug-18 Aug-22 I-5, I-5/El Toro Road Interchange TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Project D TBD Dec-14 Dec-17 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD I-5, I-405 to SR-55 TBD Sep-13 Jun-16 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Project B TBD Feb-14 Oct-16 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD I-5, SR-55 to SR-57 TBD Jul-11 Jun-13 TBD
    [Show full text]