DOCSLIB.ORG

THE ORIGIN of LIFE MATTER to a CHRISTIAN? Page 20

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE ORIGIN of LIFE MATTER to a CHRISTIAN? Page 20 DECEMBER 2011 WHAT DOES THE ORIGIN OF LIFE MATTER TO A CHRISTIAN? Page 20 CURRENTCURRENT ISSUESISSUES FROMFROM AA DISTINCTLYDISTINCTLY CHRISTIANCHRISTIAN VIEWVIEW THE ORIGIN OF LIFE A STUMBLING BLOCK FOR EVOLUTION NOT ENOUGH FAITH WHAT’S IN A CELL? PANSPERMIA $3.95 forever 16 DECEMBER 2011 18 23 FEATURES INTHISISSUE The Creation of Man: From Dust or Disorder? ..............13 Physically Blessed, Either man came from dust of the ground or he came about Spiritually Responsible.......9 from a state of disorder. … Eddy Gilpin Can We Trust the Not Enough Faith in the World For That…...................16 Both the Creation and Evolution Models require faith. Gospel of John? ................12 But which requires more? … Brad Harrub, Ph.D. Panspermia: The Latest Evolutionary Science Fiction ..18 D EPARTMENTS Richard Dawkins believes life may have come from outer space. But does that really answer the question? … Dewayne Bryant from the editors..................................4 mailbag ..............................................6 A Living Soul ......................................................................20 daily walk ............................................7 Are the brain and soul the same thing—simply a product faith and finance ................................8 of evolution … David Campbell, D.Sc. game plan..........................................10 Why Does the Origin of Life Matter to a Christian?......22 families of faith.................................11 Why does the origin debate play a key role in the issue of absolutely..........................................26 trust and intergrity for the entire Bible? … Steve Higginbotham a woman’s perspective...................27 ................................................................. man to man .......................................28 What’s in a Cell? 23 heart of the matter...........................30 A biochemist considers cellular processes in view a little R&R ........................................31 of the origins debate … Joe Deweese, Ph.D. Professing to Be Wise.........................................................24 Advances in true science have dashed hopes that life somehow spontaneously arose. … Mike Houts THINK / DECEMBER 2011 3 from the editors / Brad Harrub, Glenn Colley, David Longley, and David Shannon The ORIGIN of Life She had sat through eighteen years of Bible classes, from cradle roll What is the truth regarding the origin of life? Textbooks not withstanding, through high school. This young lady was in the church building every time the topic of the origin of life is the Achilles heel of the evolutionary theo- the doors were open, minus a few rare occasions when she came down ry. Biology books wax on eloquently about how just the right conditions could with childhood sicknesses. She was a “poster child” for her congregation— have given rise to some primordial soup, which again under the right con- polite, kind, and she seemed to have a pretty good knowledge of the ma- ditions, could have given rise to DNA particles—which under the right con- terial they covered in Bible class. Eighteen years she spent at the feet of ditions could have replicated and given rise to life. Not just one life either, faithful Christians. but two so that the species could procreate! It’s the biggest leap of faith All of that was unraveled in a mere two years. This young lady went in existence—the theory that non-living things gave rise to living materi- off to college and enrolled in many “core” classes her first two years. Her al. And yet, sadly the vast majority of students look at the charts, the pic- second semester found her sitting in a general biology class discussing tures, and the graphs, and they buy it hook, line, and sinker. the origin of life. She had never heard of the material the professor was A much better and more plausible explanation is the one we find in God’s teaching, and the textbook seemed very convincing. (After all, there were Word when we read Genesis 1. We can read how the living God spoke into colorful pictures, charts, and graphs.) Week by week she began to feel the existence life; the birds, fish, and creeping things. And then after His cre- seeds of doubt and skepticism, but she never talked to anyone about it. ation was complete, He created man in His own image and likeness—breath- In hindsight, this was the first crack in her wall. ing into his nostrils the breath of life. All Christians, both young and old, The following semester she was hit by a one-two punch. She enrolled must be grounded firm enough in the Book about beginnings that they are in general psychology and a survey of world religions. She was not aware able to defend the Biblical worldview of the earth and man’s origin. that her psychology class would begin with the evolution of man and man’s But couldn’t the issue of origins be considered a relatively small mat- brain. And this naive young lady never expected a professor to proclaim ter––interesting fodder for conversation over coffee, but nothing to become too upset about? Not when you consider what’s at stake. First, without faith it is impossible to please God (Hebrews 11:6). If God is real (and He is), All Christians must be grounded to deny His creation is to excite His wrath. Much is at stake. I cannot ex- pect to live eternally in Heaven if I’ve defiantly denied Him on earth. Sec- firm enough in the Book about ond, to claim we came about from non-living matter is to deny morals; for beginnings that they are able to if there is no Creator, then who has the right to determine and enforce any particular system of morality? The individual man becomes his own high- defend the Biblical worldview est authority. While he may choose to conform to the morals of his soci- ety, he isn’t obligated to do so. Just think of that. of the earth and man’s origin. In this issue of Think, we are going to go back to the beginning—the real beginning––and discuss the origin of life. We pray that this issue will that basically all religions were the same—and that they were all man- be a tool that you can use to teach your family and friends, but we also made institutions. By the final semester of her sophomore year, this young hope it will be a resource for those struggling—those who already have lady had stopped attending church and was now hanging out with a dif- some seeds of doubt that are taking root. As always, we hope that you will ferent group of students. They weren’t bad kids or trouble-makers by any think on these things. L means. In fact, they were considered the “intellectuals” on campus. The one major difference was that none of them took seriously the notion of God. Her spiritual foundation was now crumbled into ruins. All of her doubts and skepticism started with just one question: Where did life come from? This account, like so many others, is not uncommon today. Young peo- ple attend Bible classes, but leave unprepared to actually defend their faith. After enrolling in a university, they hear theories and hypotheses about the origin of life and the Big Bang. It all sounds so plausible, so real. BraD harruB gLenn CoLLey DaviD LongLey DaviD Shannon 4 DECEMBER 2011 / THINK Want your estate to do good works? During this time of year when we are giving thanks and swapping gifts, we hope that you will remember the work of Focus Press. We continue to strive to produce the very best material— material that is sound and looks great—material that you are proud to pass along to friends and neighbors. We would humbly ask you to consider a year-end, tax-deductible donation to the work of Focus Press. With your help more lives will be affected for Him. Donations can be mailed to our office or made online at www.focuspress.org. Focus Press, Inc. is a 501(c)3 organization. FocusGIFT CARD Press THE GIFT THAT ALWAYS FITS Focus Press gifts cards are available in any amount and they do not expire. To order that special someone a gift card, call our office at 866-313-6474. mailbag RANDY & MARLENE BAKER Volume 6, Issue 12 • December 2011 Thank you so much for all you do with Think magazine. I have issues going back to 2007 and often © Focus Press, Inc. 2011 use them in teaching ladies’ classes. We decided shortly after subscribing to Think ourselves to give published monthly by Focus Press, Inc. subscriptions to our four children. One of the wonderful things is to have one of the children call and say, “Have you gotten your new Think?” I so enjoy our conversations that follow that question. Editor: Brad Harrub, Ph.D. Thank you for providing an instant conversation with our children. I would encourage all parents of Editor: Glenn Colley Editor: David Shannon grown children to give them a subscription to Think. It gives the generation connection you talked Editor: David Longley, D.O. about in the current October 2011 issue. Again, thank you for Think magazine and may God continue Director of Youth and Culture: to bless you all in your efforts to spread the Truth. Joe Wells, M.Min. KURT & LOIS PFAFF Director of Marriage and Parenting: Steve Minor Enclosed is a contribution to help Focus Press in its effort to spread the Gospel message. We will Editorial Assistant: endeavor to send some financial help each month and at the end of the year. Tonja McRady Creative Director: Nick Long J. L. TAYLOR Office Manager: Saundra Thornton Next Sunday, I will begin a Bible class on Homosexuality and related “lifestyles,” as is PC. I recall Production Manager: Michael Thornton that an issue of Think had the subject in bold print on the front page.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spontaneous Generation of Life Is the Inevitable Outcome of Time, Chance, and the Right Chemical Conditions
    “The origin of life appears almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to be satisfied to get it going.” –Francis Crick, co-discoverer of the DNA double helix structure1 Introduction According to evolutionary theory, all life – bacteria, plants, and people – evolved from a hypothetical first cell, which allegedly arose spontaneously from chemical substrates. This is said to have happened over 3 billion years ago. That hypothetical first cell has been called LUCA (last universal common ancestor). This first cell is assumed to be at the very base of Darwin’s hypothetical “tree of life”. It is almost universally claimed that life came from non-life (abiogenesis). Is this good science? It is almost universally claimed that spontaneous generation of life is the inevitable outcome of time, chance, and the right chemical conditions. Is this claim even remotely credible? School curricula, textbooks, educational science programs, and countless museums consistently insist there is a strong scientific case for the spontaneous origin of life. From a naturalistic evolutionary perspective, it should not be surprising that spontaneous generation is assumed to be feasible, as it is essential to the evolutionary story. We can’t have Darwin’s “tree of life” without the trunk, which emerged from the primordial seed of that first cell. We are continuously told stories that sound like plausible scenarios for how simple inorganic molecules might have come together to give rise to the first living cell. However, upon careful examination, we find that the stories being told are not only extremely speculative – they are rationally indefensible.
    [Show full text]
  • Against Biopoetics
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2004 Against biopoetics: on the use and misuse of the concept of evolution in contemporary literary theory Bradley Bankston Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Bankston, Bradley, "Against biopoetics: on the use and misuse of the concept of evolution in contemporary literary theory" (2004). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1703. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1703 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. AGAINST BIOPOETICS: ON THE USE AND MISUSE OF THE CONCEPT OF EVOLUTION IN CONTEMPORARY LITERARY THEORY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of English By Bradley Bankston B.A., New College, 1990 M.A., Louisiana State University, 1999 May 2004 Table of Contents Abstract................................................iii Introduction..............................................1 Part I: Evolutionary Psychology
    [Show full text]
  • Meyer, Stephen C
    DNA BY DESIGN: AN INFERENCE TO THE BEST EXPLANATION FOR THE ORIGIN OF BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION STEPHEN C. MEYER INTRODUCTION n the second chapter of Philosophy and Biology,Elliott Sober warns historians I and philosophers of biology against the danger of anachronism. In particular, he notes that many contemporary evolutionary biologists regard the design hypothe- sis as inherently untestable and, therefore, unscientific in principle, simply because it no longer commands scientific assent. He notes that while logically unbeatable versions of the design hypothesis have been formulated (involving, for example, a “trickster God” who creates a world that appears undesigned), design hypotheses in general need not assume an untestable character. A design hypothesis could, he argues, be formulated as a fully scientific “inference to the best explanation.” He notes that scientists often evaluate the explanatory power of a “hypothesis by test- ing it against one or more competing hypotheses.”1 On these grounds, he notes that William Paley’s version of the design hypothesis was manifestly testable, but was rejected precisely because it could not explain the relevant evidence of then con- temporary biology as well as the fully naturalistic theory of Charles Darwin. Sober then casts his lot with the neo-Darwinian explanation on evidential rather than methodological grounds. But the possibility remains, he argues, that there is some other version of the design hypothesis that both disagrees with the hypothesis of evolution and also is a more likely explanation of what we observe. No one, to my knowledge, has developed such a version of the design hypothesis. But this does not mean that no one ever will.2 This paper will develop a design hypothesis, not as an explanation for the origin of species, but as an explanation for the origin of the information required to make a living system in the first place.
    [Show full text]
  • Against Biopoetics: on the Use and Misuse of the Concept of Evolution in Contemporary Literary Theory
    AGAINST BIOPOETICS: ON THE USE AND MISUSE OF THE CONCEPT OF EVOLUTION IN CONTEMPORARY LITERARY THEORY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of English By Bradley Bankston B.A., New College, 1990 M.A., Louisiana State University, 1999 May 2004 Table of Contents Abstract................................................iii Introduction..............................................1 Part I: Evolutionary Psychology and Literary Theory......11 The Model...........................................11 The Critique........................................25 Evolutionary Psychology and Literary Theme..........56 Evolutionary Psychology and Literary Form...........77 Part 2: Evolutionary Progress and Literary Theory.......114 Biological Progress................................114 Complexity.........................................130 Self-Organization..................................149 Frederick Turner: Beauty and Evolution.............154 Alexander Argyros: Self-Organization, Complexity, and Literary Theory................................179 Conclusion..............................................215 Works Cited.............................................219 Vita....................................................230 ii Abstract This dissertation is a critical assessment of “biopoetics”: a new literary theory that attempts to import ideas from evolutionary science
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Religion: a Philosophical Analysis Course Number: Phi 81.1
    Science and Religion: A Philosophical Analysis Course Number: Phi 81.1 Institution: St. John's University Instructor: Marie George Course Outline and Reading List (subject to revision): I. INTRODUCTION -Students will be asked to write out their views on the relation of religion and science. -Instructor will present various positions taken by scientists. Readings: Einstein, "About Religion" Aristotle on the Virtue of Religion Suggested reading: Cosmos, Bios, Theos. II. THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD AND ITS SCOPE: AN OVERVIEW A. General considerations regarding method Readings: Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics 1098a28-b5, 1094b24; De Caelo 306a; Physics 193b33; Parts of Animals, Bk. I, c. 1; Metaphysics, Bk. II, c. 3. B. The scientific method as developed and used in Physics (the hypothetical deductive method) 1. the scientific observation 2. laws; statistical laws 3. hypotheses and theories Readings: 3 handouts C. The scientific method and biology Reading: Handout Suggested reading: Arthur Peacocke, God and the New Biology, cc. 1-4. D. Science, Natural Philosophy, and Metaphysics: a comparison of method and objects of study Readings: Handout Excerpts from Aquinas’s commentary on Boethius De Trinitate, qq. 5 & 6. Aristotle, Metaphysics, 993b10. E. Science and Theology: Readings: Summa Theologiae, I.1, articles 2, 7, 8. (Theology as science) Augustine (as quoted in Leo XIII, “Providentissimus Deus,” 23-25 and Pius XII, “Divino Afflante Spiritu”, 7). Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, I, 70.1 ad 3; Summa Contra Gentiles, Bk. II, art. 4. John Paul II, “Letter of 1988 to Rev. George V. Coyne, S.J., Director of the Vatican Observatory”. (excerpts) John Paul II, “Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science,” 10-31-92.
    [Show full text]
  • The Most Baffling Scientific Mysteries of Our Time Ebook
    13 THINGS THAT DONT MAKE SENSE: THE MOST BAFFLING SCIENTIFIC MYSTERIES OF OUR TIME PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Michael Brooks | 240 pages | 08 Nov 2009 | Random House USA Inc | 9780307278814 | English | New York, United States 13 Things That Don't Make Sense - Wikipedia The lowest-priced brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item in its original packaging where packaging is applicable. Packaging should be the same as what is found in a retail store, unless the item is handmade or was packaged by the manufacturer in non-retail packaging, such as an unprinted box or plastic bag. See details for additional description. I purchased this book on the recommendation of my daughter, as a Christmas present for my son-in-law. I am what I call a "free-thinker" - yes - there might be aliens. What constitutes "LIFE"? And he is always coming back at me with ,"Well, Science says Thanks to Michael Brook, I can evaluate scientific allegations with a "grain of salt" viewpoint. I guess that what I most appreciate is that this book has given me and hopefully my son-inlaw, also an open-ended viewpoint within which we can converse more Thank you, Michael Brooks! Read full review. Skip to main content. About this product. New other. Stock photo. Brand new: Lowest price The lowest-priced brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item in its original packaging where packaging is applicable. Buy It Now. Add to cart. About this product Product Information Science starts to get interesting when things don't make sense. Science's best- kept secret is this: Even today, there are experimental results and reliable data that the most brilliant scientists can neither explain nor dismiss.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Volume
    i Evolutions in Counter-Terrorism Volume II: Contemporary Developments ICCT Journal Special Edition ii About ICCT The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague (ICCT) is an independent think and do tank providing multidisciplinary policy advice and practical, solution-oriented implementation support on prevention and the rule of law, two vital pillars of effective counter- terrorism. ICCT’s work focuses on themes at the intersection of countering violent extremism and criminal justice sector responses, as well as human rights-related aspects of counter-terrorism. The major project areas concern countering violent extremism, rule of law, foreign fighters, country and regional analysis, rehabilitation, civil society engagement and victims’ voices. Functioning as a nucleus within the international counter-terrorism network, ICCT connects experts, policymakers, civil society actors and practitioners from different fields by providing a platform for productive collaboration, practical analysis, and exchange of experiences and expertise, with the ultimate aim of identifying innovative and comprehensive approaches to preventing and countering terrorism. Licensing and Distribution ICCT publications are published in open access format and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives License, which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. ICCT Publication November 2020 DOI: 10.19165/2020.5.2 ISSN: 2468-0486 iii Editorial Office Editor-in-Chief Joana Cook Editorial Assistant Anna-Maria Andreeva Editorial Intern Ruth Heylin Communications Assistant Teo Kai Xiang Editorial Board William C. Bank, Syracuse University, USA Miriam Benraad, Leiden University, Netherlands Juliet Bird, NATO, UK Tore Bjørgo, University of Oslo, Norway Laurie R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of the Association for Journalism Education
    Journalism Education ISSN: 2050-3903 Journalism Education The Journal of the Association for Journalism Education Volume Eight, No: Two Christmas 2019 Page 2 Journalism Education Volume 8 number 2 Journalism Education Journalism Education is the journal of the Association for Journalism Education a body rep- resenting educators in HE in the UK and Ireland. The aim of the journal is to promote and develop analysis and understanding of journalism education and of journalism, particularly when that is related to journalism education. Editors Sallyanne Duncan, University of Strathclyde Chris Frost, Liverpool John Moores University Stuart Allan, Cardiff University Reviews editor: Tor Clark, de Montfort University You can contact the editors at [email protected] Editorial Board Chris Atton, Napier University Olga Guedes Bailey, Nottingham Trent University David Baines, Newcastle University Guy Berger, UNESCO Jane Chapman, University of Lincoln Martin Conboy, Sheffield University Ros Coward, Roehampton University Stephen Cushion, Cardiff University Susie Eisenhuth, University of Technology, Sydney Ivor Gaber, University of Sussex Roy Greenslade, City University Mark Hanna, Sheffield University Michael Higgins, Strathclyde University John Horgan, Ireland Margaret Hughes, University of the West of Scotland Sammye Johnson, Trinity University, San Antonio, USA Richard Keeble, University of Lincoln Mohammed el-Nawawy, Queens University of Charlotte An Duc Nguyen, Bournemouth University Sarah Niblock, CEO UKCP Bill Reynolds, Ryerson University,
    [Show full text]
  • Life's Solution
    This page intentionally left blank Life’s Solution Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe The assassin’s bullet misses, the Archduke’s carriage moves forward, and a catastrophic war is avoided. So too with the history of life. Rerun the tape of life, as Stephen J. Gould claimed, and the outcome must be entirely different: an alien world, without humans and maybe not even intelligence. The history of life is littered with accidents: any twist or turn may lead to a completely different world. Now this view is being challenged. Simon Conway Morris explores the evidence demonstrating life’s almost eerie ability to navigate to the correct solution, repeatedly. Eyes, brains, tools, even culture: all are very much on the cards. So if these are all evolutionary inevitabilities, where are our counterparts across the Galaxy? The tape of life can run only on a suitable planet, and it seems that such Earth-like planets may be much rarer than is hoped. Inevitable humans, yes, but in a lonely Universe. simon conway morris is Professor of Evolutionary Palaeobiology at the University of Cambridge. He was elected a fellow of the Royal Society in 1990, and presented the Royal Institution Christmas lectures in 1996. His work on Cambrian soft-bodied faunas has taken him to China, Mongolia, Greenland, and Australia, and inspired his previous book The Crucible of Creation (1998). Pre-publication praise for Life’s Solution: ‘Having spent four centuries taking the world to bits and trying to find out what makes it tick, in the twenty-first century scientists are now trying to fit the pieces together and understand why the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
    [Show full text]
  • View Or Download the Full Journal As A
    Journalism Education ISSN: 2050-3903 Journalism Education The Journal of the Association for Journalism Education Volume Eight, No: One October 2019 Page 2 Journalism Education Volume 8 number 1 Journalism Education Journalism Education is the journal of the Association for Journalism Education a body representing educators in HE in the UK and Ireland. The aim of the journal is to promote and develop analysis and understanding of journalism education and of journalism, particu- larly when that is related to journalism education. Editors Sallyanne Duncan, University of Strathclyde Chris Frost, Liverpool John Moores University Deirdre O’Neill Huddersfield University Stuart Allan, Cardiff University Reviews editor: Tor Clark, de Montfort University You can contact the editors at [email protected] Editorial Board Chris Atton, Napier University Olga Guedes Bailey, Nottingham Trent University David Baines, Newcastle University Guy Berger, UNESCO Jane Chapman, University of Lincoln Martin Conboy, Sheffield University Ros Coward, Roehampton University Stephen Cushion, Cardiff University Susie Eisenhuth, University of Technology, Sydney Ivor Gaber, University of Sussex Roy Greenslade, City University Mark Hanna, Sheffield University Michael Higgins, Strathclyde University John Horgan, Ireland Margaret Hughes, University of the West of Scotland Sammye Johnson, Trinity University, San Antonio, USA Richard Keeble, University of Lincoln Mohammed el-Nawawy, Queens University of Charlotte An Duc Nguyen, Bournemouth University Sarah Niblock, CEO UKCP Bill Reynolds, Ryerson University, Canada Ian Richards, University of South Australia Verica Rupar, Auckland University of Technology Prasun Sonwalkar, University of the West of England Linda Steiner, University of Maryland, USA Kate Wright, Edinburgh University Sonja Merljak Zdovc, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia EditorialArticles Volume 8 number 1 Journalism Education page 3 Volume Eight number one: Contents Articles Telling tales together: creating good collaborations between journalism and 6 computer science students.
    [Show full text]
  • “The End of Science”: Can We Overcome Cognitive Limitations?
    Alexander Riegler “The End of Science”: Can We Overcome Cognitive Limitations? VOLUTIONARY EPISTE- Abstract be true for any model, in- E mology has brought cluding narrative and forth the idea of science mathematical models. “Why is the universe knowable?” DAVIES (1990) as an evolutionary sys- wonders. In this paper, I argue that science is not a The success of models is tem (cf. CAMPBELL 1974, matter of knowing any universe. Rather, it is a—as their predicative power. I OESER 1984, RIEDL 1983). history has shown—superior method of guidelines of conclude that due to cog- From systems theory of how to organize experiences yielding predictive power. nitive limits of human sci- evolution (RIEDL 1977) Historically, two types of models have given rise to the entists, model-building is and the theory of punc- effectiveness of science, narrative and mathematical also subject to limitations. tuated equilibrium models. Based on cognitive psychological investiga- By using computational (GOULD/ELDREDGE 1977) tions, I point out that due to the human nature of sci- devices, those limitations we know that evolution entific reasoning both types of models are limited. might be transcended. does not proceed homo- With the advent of computational devices scientific geneously. Rather, peri- investigation may now be extended to “externalized Different ods of stasis are inter- deductions”, which are not subject to a limited short- rupted by dramatic term memory and slow performance. To shift this to perspectives on changes. Over the last computational science we have to recognize that mod- scientific activity few centuries we have els in all three approaches have basically the same Ralph GOMORY (1995) experienced science as a function.
    [Show full text]
  • For Twenty Years, the Multimillion-Dollar John Temple- Ton
    FI June-July 07 Pages 4/26/07 12:39 PM Page 27 or twenty years, the multimillion-dollar John Temple- ton Foundation has pursued an agenda broadly understood as bringing science under the guiding Fhand of religion. (Last year, it granted $60 million to some three hundred projects.) During its life, the Foundation has moved steadily from the lowbrow fringes of our intellectual establish- ment to its respectable, highly privileged center. The methods by which this transformation was carried out have been crude but effective: the Foundation has simply bought up scientists, teachers, and educators. 27 http://www.secularhumanism.org June/July 2007 FI June-July 07 Pages 5/3/07 2:23 PM Page 28 But before there was a Templeton Foundation, there was the “deep ethical truths built into the physical universe” can only Templeton Prize. In 1972, financier John Templeton, who would be discovered, never invented; (2) that Professor Townes later create the Foundation, announced an annual “Templeton attributes his discovery of the maser to “a ‘revelation’ as real Prize for Progress in Religion.” The title was later amplified as any . described in the scriptures”; and (3) that Charles (although perhaps not clarified) to describe the prize as honor- Taylor, in his 2007 acceptance speech, praised “Sir John” for ing progress toward “Research or Discoveries about Spiritual recognizing the “crippling” effect of “barriers between science Realities.” By stipulating that his prize must “always be worth and spirituality,” and denounced Stephen Weinberg (a Nobel more than the Nobel,” Templeton spelled out in hard cash his Prize winner in cosmology) for declaring that “it takes religion” conviction that “spiritual discoveries can be quantifiably more to make “good people do bad things.” significant” than discoveries in the secular disciplines favored Not until 1987 did John Templeton create a grant-making by Nobel.
    [Show full text]