DOCSLIB.ORG

Annualreport2015.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annualreport2015.Pdf WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING ABOUT OUR WORK “The Mowat Centre is leading the way on researching nudging and its effectiveness” Derek Sankey in The Calgary Herald, December 13 2014 On Public Service Transformed “Excellent primer on past and new Canadian infrastructure directions. The Mowat Centre continues on its excellent work” The Wilson Centre Canada Institute’s Beyond the Border Observer, August 6 2014 On Rebuilding Canada “A masterful survey of the fundamental economic issues of the corporate income tax” Alan Macnaughton (University of Waterloo) in The Canadian Tax Journal, Summer 2014 On Corporate Tax Reform “Particularly timely and well worth reading” Stephen Tapp (Research Director at the Institute for Research on Public Policy) in the Policy Options blog, February 18 2015 On Policymaking for the Sharing Economy “An important paper” The Governor General of Canada His Excellency the Right Honourable David Johnston, in a keynote address at the Great Lakes Economic Forum, April 28 2015 On The Vital Commons: A Policy Agenda for the Great Lakes Century Contents Mowat’s Impact Methodology 1 2014-15 By the Numbers 4 Publications 6 INTERGOvernmental ECONOMIC ANd SOCIAl POlicy 6 GOvERNMENT TRANSformation 13 Mowat NfP 16 Mowat energy 18 TldR 20 Public and Stakeholder Engagement 21 PUBlIC presentations 21 knowlEdGE TRANSfER activITIES 22 stakeholdER CONSUltations 23 Who is Using Our Work? 24 Year-End financial Statement 26 Mowat People (fellows, Advisory Board, Editorial Board) 27 director’s message In the following pages we present our 2014-15 annual report. We marked our sixth year with several accomplishments including some important policy wins, successful new initiatives, and impressive growth in our reach and recognition among stakeholders and the public. Mowat continued to solidify its reputation as Ontario’s leading evidence-based voice on intergovernmental social and economic policy. That role was underscored when the federal government amended its proposed income splitting plan following a Mowat analysis that revealed it would have a significant adverse impact on provincial government budgets. A wide national chorus of voices echoed our concerns and the problematic features we flagged were eliminated from the federal government’s final Family Tax Cut proposal. The quality and relevance of our work was recognized by media, the public, and our peers in the research community. Nearly all of our publications this year received media coverage, with one report receiving over 100 media mentions. We nearly doubled our research references compared with 2013-14, and were cited in the work of researchers from seven Canadian provinces and 15 countries on five continents. Both the C.D. Howe Institute and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives cited our work in their alternative federal budgets for 2015. And we grew our social media following significantly. In 2014-15 we introduced two new knowledge transfer initiatives. Our accessible and shareable policy blog TLDR was launched last summer and has exceeded our expectations for success. As of April 2015, we have published 32 TLDR posts providing research-based policy insight in an easily accessible — and sometimes light-hearted — format. Our first two Policy in a Pub events have proved very popular within the policy community. The events provide policy professionals with panel discussions on policy topics of the day in an informal setting conducive to interaction and the exchange of ideas. This year showed once again that our research remains in the policy conversation, continuing to have relevance and value, long after the initial publication. Fourteen of our reports published before this year earned 116 media mentions. Eighteen were cited in policy research work from other think tanks and research organizations, and fourteen were cited in academic work. We want to express our continuing gratitude to the University of Toronto and to the School of Public Policy & Governance for their ongoing support and encouragement. The School and the administration have provided a nurturing intellectual environment that both enriches our work and enables us to have a meaningful impact on Canada’s public policy conversation. We are proud of our progress in 2014-15, and look forward to doing even better next year. WIllIAM Forward Acting Director Mowat’s Impact Methodology What impact are we having? To what extent has the Mowat Centre influenced public debate and government policy? These are not easy questions for a think tank to answer. In tracking and analyzing the impact of our own work, we are committed to the same high standard that we apply to all of our research. It is an evidence-based and rigorous evaluation of what we think we have achieved. We analyze our impact in three performance categories derived from our three strategic roles. For each performance category, we identify several key performance indicators which are tracked throughout this report. These performance categories and indicators are explained in the impact methodology legend below. Impact Methodology legend POLICY POlicy MEdIA PUBlIC KnowlEdGE IMPACT Impacts MENTIONS Presentations TRANSfER activITIES GOvERNMENT RESEARCH StakeholdER Network ANd POlitical REfERENCES BRIEfINGS ANd Citations presentations OffICIAl ONlINE StakeholdER ACCESS PERfORMANCE CONSUltations IdEA GENERATOR dEvElOPING actionablE RECOMMENdations, THOUGHT lEAdERSHIP, ANd lONG- TERM agendA-SETTING To what extent are we influencing actual policymaking in the short and long-term? We analyze: POLICY POlicy Impacts IMPACT > demonstrated influence on policymaking GOvERNMENT ANd POlitical Citations > Citations in official government documents (legislation, policies and policy announcements, budget documents, official speeches, government and committee reports) > Citations in parliamentary proceedings (house debates and committee study) > Citations in political communication (communication from parties or individual politicians in press releases, op-eds and columns, blog posts etc.) OffICIAl Access > Presentations and submissions to legislative committees > Participation in stakeholder consultations > Briefings and presentations to government officials MOWAT CENTRE | 2015 ANNUAL REPORT | 1 COMMUNICATOR Sparking ANd INflUENCING PUBlIC discussion, ANd TRANSfERRING POlicy knowlEdGE to THE broadER PUBlIC To what extent are we part of the public policy conversation in our areas of research? Are we managing to shift the terms of public discourse or help clarify public policy conversations and put them on an evidence-based footing? How deep and wide is our public footprint and reach? We analyze: MEdIA MENTIONS > Mentions in print, electronic, and online media. We distinguish between major and non-major media outlets, as well as trade media (media outlets targeting specialized audiences, such as specific industries, cultural groups, interests, etc.). RESEARCH REfERENCES > References in the research-based work of other think tanks and in policy research produced by foundations, consultancies, and advocacy organizations. We distinguish between policy reports and other work (factsheets, reviews, keynotes, etc.). > References in academic work. We distinguish between peer-review published work (academic manuscripts, articles in academic journals, chapters in edited volumes) and other academic work (Phd dissertations, academic conference papers, publicly available working/discussion papers; we do not count privately circulated working/discussion papers, MA theses or undergraduate work). ONlINE PERfORMANCE > Website Activity (number of pageviews and users) > Social Networking (Twitter followers, YouTube video views, linkedIn followers, facebook likes) PUBlIC Presentations > Invited presentations and keynotes in public conferences and professional association meetings and AGMs. StakeholdER BRIEfINGS ANd presentations > Non-public invited briefings and presentations to stakeholders other than government. 2 | CONvENOR BUIldING RElationships ANd engaging A broad array Of stakeholdERS To what extent are we able to convene, collaborate and consult with a large and diverse universe of stakeholders? We analyze: StakeholdER CONSUltations > Mowat-organized consultations with other stakeholders. KnowlEdGE TRANSfER activITIES > Mowat-organized events to transfer cutting edge public policy research and insights, from both Mowat research and external experts, to invited stakeholders or the general public. Network > The breadth and spread of Mowat’s network. Analysis is forthcoming in the future. MOWAT CENTRE | 2015 ANNUAL REPORT | 3 2014-15 By the Numbers PUBLICATIONS TLDR POSTS 19 32 TOP 5 MOST POPULAR POSTS: 1 MOWAT CENTRE’S TRICK-OR-TREAT Income Splitting or INDEX Trojan Horse? The Federal Government’s Proposal and its Impact on Provincial Budgets 2 THE SPRINGFIELD MONORAIL: HOW NOT BY SUNIL JOHAL TO BUILD INFRASTRUCTURE 3 IMMIGRATION TO ONTARTIO HAS DECLINED 33% DUE TO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RULE CHANGES MowatNOTE MOWAT RESEARCH #96 SEPTEMBER 2014 | MOWATCENTRE.CA 4 HOW ONTARIO LOST 300,000 MANUFACTURING JOBS 5 THAT FEDERAL BUDGET SURPLUS? IT’S COMING FROM YOUR EI PREMIUMS ONLINE MEDIA 63% PERFORMANCE MENTIONS IN MAJOR WEBSITE ACTIVITY OUTLETS 439 167,162 6% PAGEVIEWS TRADE/SECTOR OUTLETS 52,401 USERS SOCIAL NETWORKING .75% YUK 7% 2271 .5% INTERNATIONAL TWITTER NWT FOLLOWERS 24% 1275 3% NATIONAL VIDEO AB .25% VIEWS 4% NFLD BC 1% 5% MB 50% QC 1043 ON 3% .5% LINKEDIN NS FOLLOWERS SK 1% NB 397 FACEBOOK LIKES 4 | PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT POLICY POLICY IMPACT IMPACT 21 PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of Canada 2001
    4 THE CRIC PAPERS Portraits of Canada 2001 JANUARY 2002 Table of Contents 1 Preface 3 Highlights 4 Methodology 5 1. The Economy and the Quality of Life 7 2. Canada in a Changing World Ties to the US A Common Currency? Energy Policy Globalization 13 3. Immigration 16 4. Federalism and National Unity Equalization: A Commitment to Sharing the Wealth The Practice of Federalism: An Assessment Priorities for Change The Balance of Power Support for Sovereignty in Quebec 32 5. Official Languages 33 6. Aboriginal Peoples 35 7. Health Care and Social Programs The Surplus Health Care 40 8. Rural Canada 41 Conclusion Centre for Research and Information on Canada (CRIC) 2000 McGill College Avenue, Suite 250 Montréal, Quebec H3A 3H3 1-800-363-0963 Fax: (514) 843-4590 www.ccu-cuc.ca Ce document est aussi disponible en français. Preface latest Portraits of Canada offers Not so. The a clear picture of what unites Canadians, and what divides them. Portraits of Canada also reveals that in every part of the country, except Ontario and This annual tracking poll reveals broad areas Quebec, a majority feels that their province of agreement among Canadians on a wide neither gets the respect it deserves, nor variety of subjects that were in the news enjoys the influence that it should have. during the past year. In and of itself, this more negative con- It pinpoints established or emerging sensus considerably limits the impact of consensuses on: the abovementioned areas of agreement. • support for a common Canada-US currency But it highlights another major national • rejection of a continental energy policy consensus identified in this and other CRIC • the need to protect Canadian sovereignty polls: Canadians continue to demand, in in the face of globalization a forceful and sustained way, closer • support for equalization cooperation between the federal and • up to a certain point, the best means provincial governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight Trudeau Without Cheers Assessing 10 Years of Intergovernmental Relations
    IRPP Harper without Jeers, Insight Trudeau without Cheers Assessing 10 Years of Intergovernmental Relations September 2016 | No. 8 Christopher Dunn Summary ■■ Stephen Harper’s approach to intergovernmental relations shifted somewhat from the “open federalism” that informed his initial years as prime minister toward greater multilateral engagement with provincial governments and certain unilateral moves. ■■ Harper left a legacy of smaller government and greater provincial self-reliance. ■■ Justin Trudeau focuses on collaboration and partnership, including with Indigenous peoples, but it is too early to assess results. Sommaire ■■ En matière de relations intergouvernementales, l’approche de Stephen Harper s’est progressivement éloignée du « fédéralisme ouvert » de ses premières années au pouvoir au profit d’un plus fort engagement multilatéral auprès des provinces, ponctué ici et là de poussées d’unilatéralisme. ■■ Gouvernement réduit et autonomie provinciale accrue sont deux éléments clés de l’héritage de Stephen Harper. ■■ Justin Trudeau privilégie la collaboration et les partenariats, y compris avec les peuples autochtones, mais il est encore trop tôt pour mesurer les résultats de sa démarche. WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS IN CANADA? Surprises. In October 2015, we had an election with a surprise ending. The Liberal Party, which had been third in the polls for months, won a clear majority. The new prime minister, Justin Trudeau, provided more surprises, engaging in a whirl- wind of talks with first ministers as a group and with social partners that the previous government, led by Stephen Harper, had largely ignored. He promised a new covenant with Indigenous peoples, the extent of which surprised even them. Change was in the air.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Policy in Crisis? Understanding Policy­Making in Canada
    PUBLIC POLICY IN CRISIS? UNDERSTANDING POLICY­MAKING IN CANADA UNE CRISE DES POLITIQUES PUBLIQUES ? COMMENT SE FONT LES POLITIQUES AU CANADA PROGRAMME Annual conference Conférence annuelle of the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada de l’Institut d’études canadiennes de McGill March 26 and 27, 2009 Du 26 au 27 mars 2009 McGill Faculty Club Faculty Club de McGill Montréal, Québec, Canada Montréal (Québec) Canada DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE MESSAGE DE LA DIRECTRICE Dear Friends and Colleagues, Chers amis et collègues, Welcome to the McGill Institute for the Study of Bienvenue à la conférence 2009 de l’Institut d’études Canada’s 2009 conference, Public Policy in Crisis? canadiennes de McGill : Une crise des politiques Understanding Policy‐Making in Canada. publiques ? Comment se font les politiques au Canada. Since 1995, the McGill Institute for the Study of L’Institut d’études canadiennes de McGill est fier Canada has been proud to convene annual d’organiser depuis 1995 des conférences annuelles visant conferences to foster informed, non‐partisan à promouvoir un débat informé et non‐partisan sur les discussions of issues affecting Canadians, ranging sujets qui concernent les Canadiens, comme les relations from Quebec‐Canada relations, Aboriginal issues, Québec‐Canada, les questions autochtones, la citizenship and health care to Canadian media, the citoyenneté et les soins de santé, ou encore les médias, la Charter, and cultural policy. These public events, Charte et la politique culturelle. Ces événements publics, designed to raise provocative questions and conçus pour soulever des questions stimulantes et encourage open debate, have brought together encourager un débat ouvert ont rassemblé des centaines hundreds of practitioners, academics, students, de praticiens, d’universitaires, d’étudiants et de politicians and engaged citizens, and have attracted politiciens ; ils ont suscité l’intérêt des citoyens et reçu national and international media coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • CRDCN 2018 National Conference Preliminary Program
    CRDCN 2018 National Conference Hamilton, October 18 & 19, 2018 Preliminary program As of September 24, 2018 Organizing committee Scientific committee Mike Veall, Chair Michelle Dion Academic Director, McMaster RDC Political science, McMaster University Department of Economics, McMaster University Emmanuel Guindon Joe Di Francesco Centre for Health Economics and Policy Canadian Research Data Centre Network Analysis, McMaster University Michael Haan Sarah Fortin Sociology, Western University Canadian Research Data Centre Network Kris Inwood Christine Hollins Economics, University of Guelph McMaster University Lisa Kaida Peter Kitchen Sociology, McMaster University McMaster RDC Matthew Kwan Byron Spencer Department of Family Medicine, McMaster Research Program Director, CRDCN University Professor Emeritus, McMaster University Stéphanie Lluis Assisted by Economics, University of Waterloo Evan Saunders Felice Martinello McMaster University Department of Economics, Brock University Dean Mountain Workshops by DeGroote School of Business, McMaster Kelly Cranswick University Statistics Canada Bruce Newbold Sarah Fortin Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster CRDCN University Lisa Oliver Andrea Noack Statistics Canada Sociology, Ryerson University Valerie Preston Geography. York University Acknowledgements Tammy Schirle The CRDCN is a partnership between a Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University consortium of Canadian universities and Valerie Tarasuk Statistics Canada, supported by funding Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto agencies. Our services and activities are made possible by the financial or in-kind support of Allison Williams the SSHRC, the CIHR, the CFI, Statistics Canada Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster and participating universities which we University gratefully acknowledge. Marisa Young Sociology, McMaster University Location of activities The main conference (regular, plenary, and poster sessions) will be held at the Sheraton Hamilton located at 116 King Street West, Hamilton.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 24 (2), 57–79
    The La Canadian Revue Journal canadienne of Program d’évaluation Evaluation de programme 34.2 Fall 2019 / automne 2019 Editor’s Remarks / Un mot de la rédactrice vii Isabelle Bourgeois ARTICLES Revisiting Contribution Analysis 171 John Mayne Self-Evaluation Tool for Action in Partnership: Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Original Quebec French Tool to Canadian English 192 Angèle Bilodeau and Gillian Kranias Comparison of Canadian and American Graduate Evaluation Education Programs 207 M. Theresa Hunter and James C. McDavid Évaluation de la mise en œuvre du programme d’intervention In vivo chez les jeunes de 11–12 ans d’une école primaire québécoise présentant un problème de comportements intériorisés : une étude exploratoire 235 Catherine Fréchette-Simard, Jonathan Bluteau et Isabelle Plante RESEARCH AND PRACTICE NOTES / NOTES SUR LA RECHERCHE ET LES MÉTHODES Dramatizing Learning, Performing Ourselves: Stories of Theatre-Based Evaluation in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside 255 Christopher Cook, Carolyn Camman, Andrew Leyland, Suzie O’Shea, and Angela Towle Applying the Collaborative Approaches to Evaluation (CAE) Principles in an Educational Evaluation: Reflections from the Field 272 Jeremy Acree THEME SEGMENT: DEMOCRACY AND EVALUATION / SEGMENT THÉMATIQUE : LA DÉMOCRATIE ET L’ÉVALUATION Démocratisation et efficience sont-elles antinomiques au niveau local? Le cas des réformes managériales des administrations publiques locales en Wallonie 282 Catherine Fallon “Deliverology” and Evaluation: A Tale of Two Worlds 303 Lisa Birch and
    [Show full text]
  • Mowat Centre ANNUAL REPORT 2011 – 2012 2 Mowat Centre
    MOWAT CENTRE ANNUAL REPORT 2011 – 2012 2 Mowat Centre DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE his report represents a milestone for the Mowat TCentre. It is our first annual report and its production signifies a more mature phase of our existence. As Mowat completes its third year, we are focused on sustaining our reputation and consolidating our growth. We are moving from our initial start-up phase, where our focus was producing and commu- nicating high quality applied public policy research, were identified in our report. We expect that this is- to the next stage of our organizational life. sue will continue to be a focus of public debate and further reforms will be forthcoming and the Mowat Within this new phase we will maintain our com- Centre will continue to deepen its expertise on mitment to quality and impact while investing issues relating to income security, unemployment more time and resources toward the profession- insurance, labour market training and the unique alization and development of our organization in ways these play out in different regions across the a manner that will support our growth over the country. medium- and long-term. Our research on voter equality has had an even The past three years have laid a strong foundation greater impact on policy debate, with many of our on which to build. The next challenge for Mowat is recommendations finding their way into new fed- to build on our organizational successes in order eral legislation. The work from the Mowat team has to ensure that we can withstand changes in leader- had a measurable impact on Canada’s move toward ship, personnel, governments and policy cycles – representation-by-population, and as federally- whenever they arise.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadawest FOUNDATION CANADA IS STRONGER WHEN the WEST IS THRIVING! the WEST in CANADA PROJECT
    THE WEST IN CANADA RESEARCH SERIES Whither Western Alienation? Shifting Patterns of Western Canadian Discontent with the Federal Government Loleen Berdahl, Ph.D. Research Fellow October 2010 Contents Key Findings Introduction Provincial Differences in Western Canadian Attitudes Toward the Federal Government Partisan Differences in Western Canadian Attitudes Toward the Federal Government The West in Context: National Attitudes Toward the Federal Government Conclusion CanadaWest FOUNDATION CANADA IS STRONGER WHEN THE WEST IS THRIVING! THE WEST IN CANADA PROJECT Canada is a wonderfully diverse country with its people spread across the second largest nation-state in the world. There are many things that tie us together as Canadians, but there is no doubt that each part of the country is unique and brings a different set of characteristics and perspectives to the national table. Understanding and integrating this diversity is a challenge as big as Canada itself. Western Canada—British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba—forms one of many distinct regions within Canada. The West is no more homogenous than any other region or sub-region, but there is an abundance of features that tie the four western provinces together in special ways. Shedding light on this region, communicating its frustrations and aspirations to the national community, seeking ways to build on the common ground found in the West, weaving the region into the national whole, and highlighting public policy innovation in the West are the goals of the West in Canada Project. The project, like Canada West Foundation, is based on the idea that strong and prosperous regions make for a strong and prosperous Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Easing Dissatisfaction with Canadian Federalism? the Promise of Disjointed Incrementalism
    Canadian Political Science Review 2(3) September 2008 Easing Dissatisfaction with Canadian Federalism? The Promise of Disjointed Incrementalism Éric Montpetit (Université de Montréal)1 Abstract This paper argues that the greatest threat to Canadian unity is not so much the absence of some of the characteristics that Daniel Kelemen claims are to be found in stable federations but the tendency of political leaders and parties to put forward contradicting “visions” of Canada. When such visions are used as templates for reforming the constitution, failures usually ensue. A strategy of disjointed incrementalism is a more prudent and ultimately more efficient way to proceed. It seems to be the strategy adopted by Prime Minister Harper and it could prove successful in easing some of the dissatisfactions experienced in both Quebec and western Canada. Introductioni With the election of the Conservative party in Ottawa in 2006 came the possibility that a way might be found to appease the uneasiness about Canadian federalism felt mainly in Quebec, but also in western Canada. Distancing himself from his adversaries, Prime Minister Harper promised to practice an “open federalism.” It is well known that past attempts to ease dissatisfaction with the federation failed partly because Westerners and Quebecers were unable to agree on a common vision of what Canada is or should be. Will Harper succeed where past attempts to change the Canadian federation failed? This article outlines a political strategy that should prove useful to politicians who, like Harper, seek to change Canadian federalism. It should be underlined that I come from a sub‐field of political science, administration and public policy, which has devoted little attention to Canada’s constitutional problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Umpire and Arbiter: Courts As Facilitators of Intergovernmental Dialogue in Division of Powers Cases in Canada
    Beyond Umpire and Arbiter: Courts as Facilitators of Intergovernmental Dialogue in Division of Powers Cases in Canada Wade Kenneth Wright Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of the Science of Law in the School of Law COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Wade Kenneth Wright All rights reserved ABSTRACT Beyond Umpire and Arbiter: Courts as Facilitators of Intergovernmental Dialogue in Division of Powers Cases in Canada Wade Kenneth Wright The courts in Canada have often been cast, by both courts and legal scholars, as ‘umpires’ or ‘arbiters’ of the federal-provincial division of powers – umpires or arbiters that have the exclusive, or at least decisive, authority to clarify and enforce, and resolve disputes about, ‘who does what’ in the federal system. However, the image conveyed by these metaphors underestimates the role that the federal and provincial political branches play in the federal system, by working out their own solutions, in the intergovernmental arena, both directly and indirectly, where questions and disputes arise about how jurisdiction is and should be allocated. The image conveyed by the umpire or arbiter metaphors also sits uncomfortably with the facilitative role that the Supreme Court of Canada has carved out for itself in its recent division of powers decisions, a role that casts the courts as facilitators of these instances of intergovernmental dialogue. This doctoral dissertation challenges, and moves beyond, the umpire and arbiter metaphors. It examines the political safeguards available to the provinces in Canada to prevent, or limit, perceived federal encroachments on provincial jurisdiction, in the process highlighting the role that the political branches play in Canada in working out their own allocations of jurisdiction, outside of the courts.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2003) $16,500
    Canadian Political Science Association BULLETIN Association canadienne de science politique Volume XXXII:1 June / juin 2003 Contents / Sommaire From the President / Le mot du président ............................................................................. 1 JEAN-PIERRE GABOURY, Parliamentary Internship Programme, Report 2002-2003 / Programme canadien de stage parlementaire, Rapport de 2002-2003 ............................. 5 ROBERT J. WILLIAMS, Ontario Legislature Internship Programme, Annual Report 2003 / Programme de stages à l'assemblée législative de l'Ontario, Rapport annuel 2003 ....... 10 MICHAEL HOWLETT, CHRISTIAN DUFOUR, et al., Canadian Journal of Political Science, Annual Report 2002 / Revue canadienne de science politique, Rapport annuel 2002... 13 Around the Departments / Les nouvelles des départements................................................ 27 Academic Positions Available / Offres d'emploi................................................................. 40 Calls for Papers / Appels de manuscrits.............................................................................. 45 Annonces diverses / Other Notices...................................................................................... 48 publisher/éditeur Association canadienne de science politique Canadian Political Science Association Information/Renseignements Telephone / Téléphone: 613-562-1202 Fax / Télécopieur: 613-241-0019 Electronic mail / Courrier électronique: [email protected] http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/ Le Bulletin est publié à tous les six mois,
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Notes Notes Biographiques
    BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES NOTES BIOGRAPHIQUES SPEAKERS, CHAIRS and KEYNOTES CONFÉRENCIERS, MODÉRATEURS et CONFÉRENCIERS D’HONNEUR AUDETTE-LONGO, Trish BARNEY, Darin journalist, researcher Canada Research Chair in Technology and Citizenship, Department of Art Trish Audette-Longo is a History and Communication Studies, doctoral student in the McGill University Department of Communication Studies at Concordia University. The focus of her research is on how First Nations and Métis communities Darin Barney is Canada Research Chair situated closest to Alberta's oil sands, and along in Technology & Citizenship, and Associate Professor at potential pipeline routes through British Columbia, use McGill University. He is the author of Communication media to express a variety of health, cultural, and conservation concerns in connection to bitumen Technology: The Canadian Democratic Audit; The extraction, locally-driven economic growth, and Network Society; and Prometheus Wired: The Hope for community sustainability. Prior to undertaking doctoral Democracy in the Age of Network Technology. He studies, she worked as a reporter at The Edmonton received the inaugural Social Sciences and Humanities Journal (2005-2012). Her last newsroom post was as Research Council of Canada Aurora Prize for environment reporter, during which time she covered outstanding contribution to Canadian intellectual life by hearings into the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline a new researcher and was selected in 2004 as a “Leader proposed to carry Alberta oil west to tankers at Kitimat, B.C. of Tomorrow” by the Partnership Group for Science and Engineering. He has served on the Advisory Council of the Law Commission of Canada, as Chair of the Department of Art History & Communication Studies at BAKER, Janelle McGill, and as President of the Canadian Instructor, Athabasca University, Communication Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy, Donald Trump and the Canada-US Security Community
    Canadian Journal of Political Science (2020), 1–21 doi:10.1017/S0008423920000542 RESEARCH ARTICLE/ÉTUDE ORIGINALE Democracy, Donald Trump and the Canada-US Security Community Wilfrid Greaves* Wilfrid Greaves, Department of Political Science, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Rd., Victoria, BC V8P5C2 *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract This article examines Canada-US relations through their shared membership in a plural- istic security community (PSC). While the bilateral relationship has been turbulent for decades, the Trump presidency has damaged the Canada-US PSC by (1) exacerbating a decades-long trend of weakened shared identity and mutual trust between Canadians and Americans, and (2) undermining the democratic norms and institutions that uphold American domestic stability and Canadians’ expectations of peaceful change. Assessing the combined implications of the decline in shared identity, mutual trust and democratic stability, I argue that the Canada-US PSC cannot endure if the United States does not also consider Canada’s national and security interests or if the United States itself poses a threat to those interests. Given current trends, the future absence of war in North America may reflect American domination over a weaker and dependent Canada rather than their continued membership in a bilateral PSC. Résumé Cet article examine les relations canado-américaines à travers leur appartenance à une communauté pluraliste de la securité (CPS). Alors que les relations bilatérales ont été mouvementées pendant des décennies, la présidence Trump a porté préjudice à la CPS Canada-États-Unis 1) en exacerbant une tendance à l’affaiblissement de l’identité commune et de la confiance mutuelle entre Canadiens et Américains qui dure depuis des décennies, et 2) en sapant les normes et institutions démocratiques qui soutiennent la stabilité intérieure américaine et les attentes des Canadiens en matière de changement pacifique.
    [Show full text]