DOCSLIB.ORG

Federalism-E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federalism-E 2015 EDITION VOLUME 16 FEDERALISM-E Samuel Mosonyi |Stare Decisis or Selective Judicial Reasoning? 0 FEDERALISM-E, VOLUME 16 Alexandra LaPlante & Alexander Manderson Chief Editors Royal Military College of Canada Dr. Christian Leuprecht Advisor Department of Political Science, Royal Military College of Canada / Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University Dr. Laura Robinson Advisor Department of English, Royal Military College of Canada Peer-Review Editorial Board Angelique Ahlstrom, University of Victoria Gabrielle Archambault, Royal Military College of Canada Harrison Kelertas, Royal Military College of Canada Conor Lewis, Dalhousie University Abigail McLatchy, Dalhousie University Tyson Murray, Royal Military College of Canada Hamza Tariq, University of Western Ontario Contents Editors' Address 1 Urban Governance and the Future of Canadian Federalism 2 Conor Lewis, Dalhousie University A Collaborative Method to Overcome the Difficulty of Constitutional Amendment 10 Abigail McLatchy The EU: Towards a United States of Europe 16 Eric Servais, University of Victoria Deferential Federalism: The Politics and Policy Implications of ‘Collaborative’ Federalism Since 1994 22 Gregory Wilford, University of Western Ontario Open Federalism: A Balancing Act of Multiculturalist Concerns and Fiscal Imbalances 30 Brianna Wolfe, Dalhousie University La refonte du fédéralisme suisse: impacts sur les autonomies cantonale et communale 37 Laetitia Mathys & Nicolas Keuffer, Université de Lausanne (soumission spéciale - travail de doctorat) Authors & Editors 54 Volume 16 Federalism-e Welcome to Federalism-e Bienvenue à Federalism-E Federalism-E is a peer reviewed Federalism-E est un journal undergraduate journal that encourages universitaire de premier cycle également révisé scholarly debate and research in the area of par des universitaires, qui encourage les débats federalism by exploring topics such as political pédagogiques dans le domaine du fédéralisme theory, multi-level governance, and et explore des sujets tels que les théories intergovernmental relations. Papers were politiques, le gouvernement à plusieurs submitted from across the country and abroad échelons ainsi que les relations and then sent out undergraduate students who intergouvernementales. Ces dissertations ont volunteered to be a part of our peer review été soumises des quatre coins du pays et même board. After extensive evaluation, this year’s de l’étranger, et ensuite envoyées aux élèves de papers were selected and returned to the premier cycle qui se sont portés volontaires authors according to a double blind review pour notre comité de rédaction. Après process before being polished into a publishable plusieurs évaluations, les essais qui vous seront product. The result is this, our 16th consecutive présentés ont été retournés aux auteurs afin year of publication. de permettre à ceux-ci de faire les corrections pour la publication. Le résultat vous est ème It is with great pleasure that we present donc présenté ici, dans la 16 publication this year’s collection of essays. We hope to consécutive du journal. encourage undergraduate students to C’est avec grand plaisir que nous contribute to the community of academic présentons le fruit de cette collaboration. Nous studies, create a forum for better understanding espérons encourager les étudiants de premier the topic of federalism, and to offer high- cycle à contribuer plus à la communauté performing students the experience of universitaire et à créer un forum pour améliorer participating in the process of academic la compréhension sur le sujet du fédéralisme. publication. We hope you enjoy this year's tout en offrant une opportunité pour participer edition. dans la publication d'un journal. Bonne lecture! Alexandra LaPlante and Alex Manderson Co-Editors, Federalism-e Welcome to Federalism-e 1 Urban Governance and the Future of Canadian Federalism Conor Lewis Dalhousie University The Canadian federation is constantly not entrenches, then conventionalizes the being reconfigured. Throughout our 147 years of processes of multi-level governance between all nationhood Canada has evolved from a quasi- three levels of the Canadian federation. This federal 1 state to arguably one of the most analysis leads to the conclusion that the Canadian decentralized federations in the world. However, federation has not adapted sufficiently to the for all the change that has occurred as we reality of urbanization. approach our sesquicentennial anniversary urban The division of powers between federal and city centers are still treated as if they are the provincial jurisdiction was entrenched in s.91 and colonial holdings of their provincial masters. The s.92 of the British North America Act of 1867. The rigidity in which the constitutional division of constitution delineates that the provinces have powers is interpreted in regards to municipal jurisdiction over municipal institutions and control affairs allows for the continued suppression of over generally all matters of a merely local or urban governance. By not allowing the full private nature.5 The decision to give the provinces participation of urban local government within the jurisdiction over municipal government was federation, Canada has turned a blind eye to the compatible with the demographics of nineteenth economic realities of the globalized Knowledge century Canada. In 1861 the total urban Based Economy (KBE)2 and the essential role that population of Canada was 527 220, this accounted “Global City Regions (GCRs)” will play as the for only 16% of the total population.6 With the economic “motors of the information era.” 3 vast majority of the citizenry living in the rural Through the systematic underfunding of our hinterlands urban affairs was not an issue of regional economic hubs,4 the country is limiting pressing substance. However, at the time of the the cultural creativity and fiscal growth of our last census in 2011 Statistics Canada reported that urban municipalities. In order for Canadian urban 81% of Canadians and 86% of Ontarians were now centers, and thereby Canada, to thrive a part of the urban population.7 Although the municipalities and urban citizens need to apply overwhelming majority of Canadians now live in pressure on the federal and provincial cities, municipal governments policymaking governments to establish a legal framework that if 1 Gregory Inwood, Understanding Canadian Federalism: 5 Department of Justice Canada, "The Constitution Acts An Introduction to Theory and Practice (Toronto: 1867 to 1982," January 1, 2013, Accessed November 1, Pearson Canada, 2013), 58. Quasi-Federal: coined by 2014, http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/CONST_E.pdf. K.C. Wheare, it is a model in which provincial The Constitution Acts 1867 to 1982, pg.29. s.92(8) & governments are seen as subordinate to the federal s.92(16) of the constitution are referenced here. government. 6 "Population, Urban and Rural, by Province and 2Thomas J Courchene, "Global Futures for Canada's Territory (Ontario)." Government of Canada, Statistics Global Cities," IRPP Policy Matters 8, no. 2 (2007): 27. Canada. February 4, 2011. Accessed November 1, 2014. 3 Ibid., 1. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum- 4 Ibid., 1. There are 9 economic hubs (Vancouver, som/l01/cst01/demo62g-eng.htm Edmonton, Calgary, Regina and Saskatoon, Winnipeg, 7 Ibid. Toronto, Montreal, Halifax). 2 2 Conor Lewis || Urban Governance and the Future of Canadian Federalism powers remain significantly circumscribed by the former suburbs were given an equal place at provincial government8. Hamilton City Hall, but the issues that the Municipalities, constitutionally speaking suburban citizen wants addressed are drastically are creatures 9 of the provinces. Provincial different then the issues that are plaguing the governments are able to create, eliminate, and inner city. [See Table 1]; regulate municipalities.10 The jurisdictional rights provided to the provinces allow them to control all Hamilton 2005: Average Household Income aspects of urban development. 11 The trend Average Total Number towards amalgamation showcases the supremacy Ward Household of Private of the provinces and the relative weakness of Income Household municipalities. The amalgamation of Ward 2 $41,307 19,430 municipalities, argues Caroline Andrew, is “not so Ward 3 $45,481 16,730 much for [the] better capacity [of the municipality] Ward 12 12 to act but for less expensive city government.” (Formally $126,715 10,070 The act of amalgamation makes the territorial Ancaster) boundaries of a municipality larger. Increasing the Ward 14 size of a city, however, diminishes the ability of (Formally $96,633 8,375 neighborhoods and individual citizens to influence Flamborough) 13 local decision-making, by expanding further away City of Hamilton $70,025 194,455 from the city center suburban voices are allowed [Table 1] to have an influence on urban decision making. http://www.investinhamilton.ca/wp- In January 2001 the five municipalities content/uploads/2013/10/SSSP-WardProfiles- surrounding Hamilton (Ancaster, Dundas, Ward2.pdf (Ward 2) Flamborough, Glanbrook, and Stoney Creek) were http://www.investinhamilton.ca/wp- 14 amalgamated to form the City of Hamilton. The content/uploads/2013/10/SSSP-WardProfiles- Ward3.pdf (Ward 3) 8 Patrick Smith and Kennedy Stewart, "Local Whole-of- http://www.investinhamilton.ca/wp- Government Policymaking in Vancouver: Beavers, Cats, content/uploads/2013/10/SSSP-WardProfiles- and the Mushy Middle Thesis," In Canada:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of Canada 2001
    4 THE CRIC PAPERS Portraits of Canada 2001 JANUARY 2002 Table of Contents 1 Preface 3 Highlights 4 Methodology 5 1. The Economy and the Quality of Life 7 2. Canada in a Changing World Ties to the US A Common Currency? Energy Policy Globalization 13 3. Immigration 16 4. Federalism and National Unity Equalization: A Commitment to Sharing the Wealth The Practice of Federalism: An Assessment Priorities for Change The Balance of Power Support for Sovereignty in Quebec 32 5. Official Languages 33 6. Aboriginal Peoples 35 7. Health Care and Social Programs The Surplus Health Care 40 8. Rural Canada 41 Conclusion Centre for Research and Information on Canada (CRIC) 2000 McGill College Avenue, Suite 250 Montréal, Quebec H3A 3H3 1-800-363-0963 Fax: (514) 843-4590 www.ccu-cuc.ca Ce document est aussi disponible en français. Preface latest Portraits of Canada offers Not so. The a clear picture of what unites Canadians, and what divides them. Portraits of Canada also reveals that in every part of the country, except Ontario and This annual tracking poll reveals broad areas Quebec, a majority feels that their province of agreement among Canadians on a wide neither gets the respect it deserves, nor variety of subjects that were in the news enjoys the influence that it should have. during the past year. In and of itself, this more negative con- It pinpoints established or emerging sensus considerably limits the impact of consensuses on: the abovementioned areas of agreement. • support for a common Canada-US currency But it highlights another major national • rejection of a continental energy policy consensus identified in this and other CRIC • the need to protect Canadian sovereignty polls: Canadians continue to demand, in in the face of globalization a forceful and sustained way, closer • support for equalization cooperation between the federal and • up to a certain point, the best means provincial governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Annualreport2015.Pdf
    WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING ABOUT OUR WORK “The Mowat Centre is leading the way on researching nudging and its effectiveness” Derek Sankey in The Calgary Herald, December 13 2014 On Public Service Transformed “Excellent primer on past and new Canadian infrastructure directions. The Mowat Centre continues on its excellent work” The Wilson Centre Canada Institute’s Beyond the Border Observer, August 6 2014 On Rebuilding Canada “A masterful survey of the fundamental economic issues of the corporate income tax” Alan Macnaughton (University of Waterloo) in The Canadian Tax Journal, Summer 2014 On Corporate Tax Reform “Particularly timely and well worth reading” Stephen Tapp (Research Director at the Institute for Research on Public Policy) in the Policy Options blog, February 18 2015 On Policymaking for the Sharing Economy “An important paper” The Governor General of Canada His Excellency the Right Honourable David Johnston, in a keynote address at the Great Lakes Economic Forum, April 28 2015 On The Vital Commons: A Policy Agenda for the Great Lakes Century Contents Mowat’s Impact Methodology 1 2014-15 By the Numbers 4 Publications 6 INTERGOvernmental ECONOMIC ANd SOCIAl POlicy 6 GOvERNMENT TRANSformation 13 Mowat NfP 16 Mowat energy 18 TldR 20 Public and Stakeholder Engagement 21 PUBlIC presentations 21 knowlEdGE TRANSfER activITIES 22 stakeholdER CONSUltations 23 Who is Using Our Work? 24 Year-End financial Statement 26 Mowat People (fellows, Advisory Board, Editorial Board) 27 director’s message In the following pages we present our 2014-15 annual report. We marked our sixth year with several accomplishments including some important policy wins, successful new initiatives, and impressive growth in our reach and recognition among stakeholders and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight Trudeau Without Cheers Assessing 10 Years of Intergovernmental Relations
    IRPP Harper without Jeers, Insight Trudeau without Cheers Assessing 10 Years of Intergovernmental Relations September 2016 | No. 8 Christopher Dunn Summary ■■ Stephen Harper’s approach to intergovernmental relations shifted somewhat from the “open federalism” that informed his initial years as prime minister toward greater multilateral engagement with provincial governments and certain unilateral moves. ■■ Harper left a legacy of smaller government and greater provincial self-reliance. ■■ Justin Trudeau focuses on collaboration and partnership, including with Indigenous peoples, but it is too early to assess results. Sommaire ■■ En matière de relations intergouvernementales, l’approche de Stephen Harper s’est progressivement éloignée du « fédéralisme ouvert » de ses premières années au pouvoir au profit d’un plus fort engagement multilatéral auprès des provinces, ponctué ici et là de poussées d’unilatéralisme. ■■ Gouvernement réduit et autonomie provinciale accrue sont deux éléments clés de l’héritage de Stephen Harper. ■■ Justin Trudeau privilégie la collaboration et les partenariats, y compris avec les peuples autochtones, mais il est encore trop tôt pour mesurer les résultats de sa démarche. WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS IN CANADA? Surprises. In October 2015, we had an election with a surprise ending. The Liberal Party, which had been third in the polls for months, won a clear majority. The new prime minister, Justin Trudeau, provided more surprises, engaging in a whirl- wind of talks with first ministers as a group and with social partners that the previous government, led by Stephen Harper, had largely ignored. He promised a new covenant with Indigenous peoples, the extent of which surprised even them. Change was in the air.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Policy in Crisis? Understanding Policy­Making in Canada
    PUBLIC POLICY IN CRISIS? UNDERSTANDING POLICY­MAKING IN CANADA UNE CRISE DES POLITIQUES PUBLIQUES ? COMMENT SE FONT LES POLITIQUES AU CANADA PROGRAMME Annual conference Conférence annuelle of the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada de l’Institut d’études canadiennes de McGill March 26 and 27, 2009 Du 26 au 27 mars 2009 McGill Faculty Club Faculty Club de McGill Montréal, Québec, Canada Montréal (Québec) Canada DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE MESSAGE DE LA DIRECTRICE Dear Friends and Colleagues, Chers amis et collègues, Welcome to the McGill Institute for the Study of Bienvenue à la conférence 2009 de l’Institut d’études Canada’s 2009 conference, Public Policy in Crisis? canadiennes de McGill : Une crise des politiques Understanding Policy‐Making in Canada. publiques ? Comment se font les politiques au Canada. Since 1995, the McGill Institute for the Study of L’Institut d’études canadiennes de McGill est fier Canada has been proud to convene annual d’organiser depuis 1995 des conférences annuelles visant conferences to foster informed, non‐partisan à promouvoir un débat informé et non‐partisan sur les discussions of issues affecting Canadians, ranging sujets qui concernent les Canadiens, comme les relations from Quebec‐Canada relations, Aboriginal issues, Québec‐Canada, les questions autochtones, la citizenship and health care to Canadian media, the citoyenneté et les soins de santé, ou encore les médias, la Charter, and cultural policy. These public events, Charte et la politique culturelle. Ces événements publics, designed to raise provocative questions and conçus pour soulever des questions stimulantes et encourage open debate, have brought together encourager un débat ouvert ont rassemblé des centaines hundreds of practitioners, academics, students, de praticiens, d’universitaires, d’étudiants et de politicians and engaged citizens, and have attracted politiciens ; ils ont suscité l’intérêt des citoyens et reçu national and international media coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • CRDCN 2018 National Conference Preliminary Program
    CRDCN 2018 National Conference Hamilton, October 18 & 19, 2018 Preliminary program As of September 24, 2018 Organizing committee Scientific committee Mike Veall, Chair Michelle Dion Academic Director, McMaster RDC Political science, McMaster University Department of Economics, McMaster University Emmanuel Guindon Joe Di Francesco Centre for Health Economics and Policy Canadian Research Data Centre Network Analysis, McMaster University Michael Haan Sarah Fortin Sociology, Western University Canadian Research Data Centre Network Kris Inwood Christine Hollins Economics, University of Guelph McMaster University Lisa Kaida Peter Kitchen Sociology, McMaster University McMaster RDC Matthew Kwan Byron Spencer Department of Family Medicine, McMaster Research Program Director, CRDCN University Professor Emeritus, McMaster University Stéphanie Lluis Assisted by Economics, University of Waterloo Evan Saunders Felice Martinello McMaster University Department of Economics, Brock University Dean Mountain Workshops by DeGroote School of Business, McMaster Kelly Cranswick University Statistics Canada Bruce Newbold Sarah Fortin Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster CRDCN University Lisa Oliver Andrea Noack Statistics Canada Sociology, Ryerson University Valerie Preston Geography. York University Acknowledgements Tammy Schirle The CRDCN is a partnership between a Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University consortium of Canadian universities and Valerie Tarasuk Statistics Canada, supported by funding Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto agencies. Our services and activities are made possible by the financial or in-kind support of Allison Williams the SSHRC, the CIHR, the CFI, Statistics Canada Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster and participating universities which we University gratefully acknowledge. Marisa Young Sociology, McMaster University Location of activities The main conference (regular, plenary, and poster sessions) will be held at the Sheraton Hamilton located at 116 King Street West, Hamilton.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 24 (2), 57–79
    The La Canadian Revue Journal canadienne of Program d’évaluation Evaluation de programme 34.2 Fall 2019 / automne 2019 Editor’s Remarks / Un mot de la rédactrice vii Isabelle Bourgeois ARTICLES Revisiting Contribution Analysis 171 John Mayne Self-Evaluation Tool for Action in Partnership: Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Original Quebec French Tool to Canadian English 192 Angèle Bilodeau and Gillian Kranias Comparison of Canadian and American Graduate Evaluation Education Programs 207 M. Theresa Hunter and James C. McDavid Évaluation de la mise en œuvre du programme d’intervention In vivo chez les jeunes de 11–12 ans d’une école primaire québécoise présentant un problème de comportements intériorisés : une étude exploratoire 235 Catherine Fréchette-Simard, Jonathan Bluteau et Isabelle Plante RESEARCH AND PRACTICE NOTES / NOTES SUR LA RECHERCHE ET LES MÉTHODES Dramatizing Learning, Performing Ourselves: Stories of Theatre-Based Evaluation in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside 255 Christopher Cook, Carolyn Camman, Andrew Leyland, Suzie O’Shea, and Angela Towle Applying the Collaborative Approaches to Evaluation (CAE) Principles in an Educational Evaluation: Reflections from the Field 272 Jeremy Acree THEME SEGMENT: DEMOCRACY AND EVALUATION / SEGMENT THÉMATIQUE : LA DÉMOCRATIE ET L’ÉVALUATION Démocratisation et efficience sont-elles antinomiques au niveau local? Le cas des réformes managériales des administrations publiques locales en Wallonie 282 Catherine Fallon “Deliverology” and Evaluation: A Tale of Two Worlds 303 Lisa Birch and
    [Show full text]
  • Mowat Centre ANNUAL REPORT 2011 – 2012 2 Mowat Centre
    MOWAT CENTRE ANNUAL REPORT 2011 – 2012 2 Mowat Centre DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE his report represents a milestone for the Mowat TCentre. It is our first annual report and its production signifies a more mature phase of our existence. As Mowat completes its third year, we are focused on sustaining our reputation and consolidating our growth. We are moving from our initial start-up phase, where our focus was producing and commu- nicating high quality applied public policy research, were identified in our report. We expect that this is- to the next stage of our organizational life. sue will continue to be a focus of public debate and further reforms will be forthcoming and the Mowat Within this new phase we will maintain our com- Centre will continue to deepen its expertise on mitment to quality and impact while investing issues relating to income security, unemployment more time and resources toward the profession- insurance, labour market training and the unique alization and development of our organization in ways these play out in different regions across the a manner that will support our growth over the country. medium- and long-term. Our research on voter equality has had an even The past three years have laid a strong foundation greater impact on policy debate, with many of our on which to build. The next challenge for Mowat is recommendations finding their way into new fed- to build on our organizational successes in order eral legislation. The work from the Mowat team has to ensure that we can withstand changes in leader- had a measurable impact on Canada’s move toward ship, personnel, governments and policy cycles – representation-by-population, and as federally- whenever they arise.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadawest FOUNDATION CANADA IS STRONGER WHEN the WEST IS THRIVING! the WEST in CANADA PROJECT
    THE WEST IN CANADA RESEARCH SERIES Whither Western Alienation? Shifting Patterns of Western Canadian Discontent with the Federal Government Loleen Berdahl, Ph.D. Research Fellow October 2010 Contents Key Findings Introduction Provincial Differences in Western Canadian Attitudes Toward the Federal Government Partisan Differences in Western Canadian Attitudes Toward the Federal Government The West in Context: National Attitudes Toward the Federal Government Conclusion CanadaWest FOUNDATION CANADA IS STRONGER WHEN THE WEST IS THRIVING! THE WEST IN CANADA PROJECT Canada is a wonderfully diverse country with its people spread across the second largest nation-state in the world. There are many things that tie us together as Canadians, but there is no doubt that each part of the country is unique and brings a different set of characteristics and perspectives to the national table. Understanding and integrating this diversity is a challenge as big as Canada itself. Western Canada—British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba—forms one of many distinct regions within Canada. The West is no more homogenous than any other region or sub-region, but there is an abundance of features that tie the four western provinces together in special ways. Shedding light on this region, communicating its frustrations and aspirations to the national community, seeking ways to build on the common ground found in the West, weaving the region into the national whole, and highlighting public policy innovation in the West are the goals of the West in Canada Project. The project, like Canada West Foundation, is based on the idea that strong and prosperous regions make for a strong and prosperous Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Easing Dissatisfaction with Canadian Federalism? the Promise of Disjointed Incrementalism
    Canadian Political Science Review 2(3) September 2008 Easing Dissatisfaction with Canadian Federalism? The Promise of Disjointed Incrementalism Éric Montpetit (Université de Montréal)1 Abstract This paper argues that the greatest threat to Canadian unity is not so much the absence of some of the characteristics that Daniel Kelemen claims are to be found in stable federations but the tendency of political leaders and parties to put forward contradicting “visions” of Canada. When such visions are used as templates for reforming the constitution, failures usually ensue. A strategy of disjointed incrementalism is a more prudent and ultimately more efficient way to proceed. It seems to be the strategy adopted by Prime Minister Harper and it could prove successful in easing some of the dissatisfactions experienced in both Quebec and western Canada. Introductioni With the election of the Conservative party in Ottawa in 2006 came the possibility that a way might be found to appease the uneasiness about Canadian federalism felt mainly in Quebec, but also in western Canada. Distancing himself from his adversaries, Prime Minister Harper promised to practice an “open federalism.” It is well known that past attempts to ease dissatisfaction with the federation failed partly because Westerners and Quebecers were unable to agree on a common vision of what Canada is or should be. Will Harper succeed where past attempts to change the Canadian federation failed? This article outlines a political strategy that should prove useful to politicians who, like Harper, seek to change Canadian federalism. It should be underlined that I come from a sub‐field of political science, administration and public policy, which has devoted little attention to Canada’s constitutional problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Umpire and Arbiter: Courts As Facilitators of Intergovernmental Dialogue in Division of Powers Cases in Canada
    Beyond Umpire and Arbiter: Courts as Facilitators of Intergovernmental Dialogue in Division of Powers Cases in Canada Wade Kenneth Wright Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of the Science of Law in the School of Law COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Wade Kenneth Wright All rights reserved ABSTRACT Beyond Umpire and Arbiter: Courts as Facilitators of Intergovernmental Dialogue in Division of Powers Cases in Canada Wade Kenneth Wright The courts in Canada have often been cast, by both courts and legal scholars, as ‘umpires’ or ‘arbiters’ of the federal-provincial division of powers – umpires or arbiters that have the exclusive, or at least decisive, authority to clarify and enforce, and resolve disputes about, ‘who does what’ in the federal system. However, the image conveyed by these metaphors underestimates the role that the federal and provincial political branches play in the federal system, by working out their own solutions, in the intergovernmental arena, both directly and indirectly, where questions and disputes arise about how jurisdiction is and should be allocated. The image conveyed by the umpire or arbiter metaphors also sits uncomfortably with the facilitative role that the Supreme Court of Canada has carved out for itself in its recent division of powers decisions, a role that casts the courts as facilitators of these instances of intergovernmental dialogue. This doctoral dissertation challenges, and moves beyond, the umpire and arbiter metaphors. It examines the political safeguards available to the provinces in Canada to prevent, or limit, perceived federal encroachments on provincial jurisdiction, in the process highlighting the role that the political branches play in Canada in working out their own allocations of jurisdiction, outside of the courts.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2003) $16,500
    Canadian Political Science Association BULLETIN Association canadienne de science politique Volume XXXII:1 June / juin 2003 Contents / Sommaire From the President / Le mot du président ............................................................................. 1 JEAN-PIERRE GABOURY, Parliamentary Internship Programme, Report 2002-2003 / Programme canadien de stage parlementaire, Rapport de 2002-2003 ............................. 5 ROBERT J. WILLIAMS, Ontario Legislature Internship Programme, Annual Report 2003 / Programme de stages à l'assemblée législative de l'Ontario, Rapport annuel 2003 ....... 10 MICHAEL HOWLETT, CHRISTIAN DUFOUR, et al., Canadian Journal of Political Science, Annual Report 2002 / Revue canadienne de science politique, Rapport annuel 2002... 13 Around the Departments / Les nouvelles des départements................................................ 27 Academic Positions Available / Offres d'emploi................................................................. 40 Calls for Papers / Appels de manuscrits.............................................................................. 45 Annonces diverses / Other Notices...................................................................................... 48 publisher/éditeur Association canadienne de science politique Canadian Political Science Association Information/Renseignements Telephone / Téléphone: 613-562-1202 Fax / Télécopieur: 613-241-0019 Electronic mail / Courrier électronique: [email protected] http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/ Le Bulletin est publié à tous les six mois,
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Notes Notes Biographiques
    BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES NOTES BIOGRAPHIQUES SPEAKERS, CHAIRS and KEYNOTES CONFÉRENCIERS, MODÉRATEURS et CONFÉRENCIERS D’HONNEUR AUDETTE-LONGO, Trish BARNEY, Darin journalist, researcher Canada Research Chair in Technology and Citizenship, Department of Art Trish Audette-Longo is a History and Communication Studies, doctoral student in the McGill University Department of Communication Studies at Concordia University. The focus of her research is on how First Nations and Métis communities Darin Barney is Canada Research Chair situated closest to Alberta's oil sands, and along in Technology & Citizenship, and Associate Professor at potential pipeline routes through British Columbia, use McGill University. He is the author of Communication media to express a variety of health, cultural, and conservation concerns in connection to bitumen Technology: The Canadian Democratic Audit; The extraction, locally-driven economic growth, and Network Society; and Prometheus Wired: The Hope for community sustainability. Prior to undertaking doctoral Democracy in the Age of Network Technology. He studies, she worked as a reporter at The Edmonton received the inaugural Social Sciences and Humanities Journal (2005-2012). Her last newsroom post was as Research Council of Canada Aurora Prize for environment reporter, during which time she covered outstanding contribution to Canadian intellectual life by hearings into the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline a new researcher and was selected in 2004 as a “Leader proposed to carry Alberta oil west to tankers at Kitimat, B.C. of Tomorrow” by the Partnership Group for Science and Engineering. He has served on the Advisory Council of the Law Commission of Canada, as Chair of the Department of Art History & Communication Studies at BAKER, Janelle McGill, and as President of the Canadian Instructor, Athabasca University, Communication Association.
    [Show full text]