CRDCN 2018 National Conference Preliminary Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CRDCN 2018 National Conference Preliminary Program CRDCN 2018 National Conference Hamilton, October 18 & 19, 2018 Preliminary program As of September 24, 2018 Organizing committee Scientific committee Mike Veall, Chair Michelle Dion Academic Director, McMaster RDC Political science, McMaster University Department of Economics, McMaster University Emmanuel Guindon Joe Di Francesco Centre for Health Economics and Policy Canadian Research Data Centre Network Analysis, McMaster University Michael Haan Sarah Fortin Sociology, Western University Canadian Research Data Centre Network Kris Inwood Christine Hollins Economics, University of Guelph McMaster University Lisa Kaida Peter Kitchen Sociology, McMaster University McMaster RDC Matthew Kwan Byron Spencer Department of Family Medicine, McMaster Research Program Director, CRDCN University Professor Emeritus, McMaster University Stéphanie Lluis Assisted by Economics, University of Waterloo Evan Saunders Felice Martinello McMaster University Department of Economics, Brock University Dean Mountain Workshops by DeGroote School of Business, McMaster Kelly Cranswick University Statistics Canada Bruce Newbold Sarah Fortin Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster CRDCN University Lisa Oliver Andrea Noack Statistics Canada Sociology, Ryerson University Valerie Preston Geography. York University Acknowledgements Tammy Schirle The CRDCN is a partnership between a Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University consortium of Canadian universities and Valerie Tarasuk Statistics Canada, supported by funding Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto agencies. Our services and activities are made possible by the financial or in-kind support of Allison Williams the SSHRC, the CIHR, the CFI, Statistics Canada Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster and participating universities which we University gratefully acknowledge. Marisa Young Sociology, McMaster University Location of activities The main conference (regular, plenary, and poster sessions) will be held at the Sheraton Hamilton located at 116 King Street West, Hamilton. The conference dinner will be held at the Art Gallery of Hamilton, located at 123 King Street West, Hamilton. The welcome reception will be at the Braley Health Centre, located at 100 Main Street West, Hamilton. Preconference workshops will take place at the L.R. Wilson Hall, McMaster University (access via Sterling Steet, corner of Forsyth Avenue N.) Additional information For your convenience, a limited number of rooms is available at a special rate at the Sheraton Hamilton. Reserve your room online, before September 15, or by phone at 1-888-627-8161 and ask for the “CRDCN National Conference” rate. Self- and valet parking facilities at the Sheraton ($12.50-$22.50 per day). Taxi in Hamilton: Hamilton Cab 905-777-7777; Blue Line taxi 905-525-0000 Wifi will be available at the Sheraton Hamilton and at McMaster University. 3 Our keynote speakers Nicole M. Fortin Nicole is a Professor of Economics at the University of British Columbia and a research fellow of the International Institute for the Study of Labor, IZA. Her research interests focus on two themes: wage inequality and its links to labor market institutions, and issues related to the economic progress of women. Her contributions in applied econometrics, published in Econometrica, comprise the widely used DFL reweighting decomposition methodology and the RIF (recentered influence function)-regression methodology. She has co-authored the chapter on Decomposition Methods in the authoritative Handbook of Labor Economics published in 2011. Matthew Mendelsohn Matthew is the Deputy Secretary to the Cabinet for Results and Delivery in the Privy Council Office, leading the federal government’s Results and Delivery Unit and Impact and Innovation Unit. Prior to returning to the federal public service, Matthew was the founding Director of the Mowat Centre, a public policy think tank in the School of Public Policy & Governance at the University of Toronto. During that time he published and lectured widely on government transformation, democratic institutions and intergovernmental politics. Matthew received his B.A. from McGill University and Ph.D. from the Université de Montréal. 4 Conference program at a glance Wednesday, October 17 - McMaster University 8h30-9h00 Registration & continental breakfast L.R. Wilson Hall 9h00-17h00 Preconference workshops L.R. Wilson Hall 18h00-21h00 Welcome reception Braley Health Centre Thursday, October 18 - Sheraton Hamilton 7h45-8h30 Registration & continental breakfast Foyer Working breakfast with Pierre Turcotte, Status of 8h00-8h20 Centre ballroom Women Canada 8h30-9h00 Words of welcome East ballroom 9h00-10h30 Simultaneous sessions Center, East, or South ballrooms 10h30-11h00 Break Foyer 11h00-12h30 Simultaneous sessions Center, East, or South ballrooms Lunch 12h30-13h45 followed by a special address by Martin Taylor, East ballroom CRDCN 13h45-14h30 Poster session West ballroom 14h30-16h00 Simultaneous sessions Center, East, or South ballrooms 16h00-16h30 Break Foyer Keynote address by Matthew Mendelsohn, 16h30-17h30 East ballroom Government of Canada 18h00-22h00 Visit to the Art Gallery and conference dinner Art Gallery of Hamilton Friday, October 19 – Sheraton Hamilton 8h00-8h45 Registration & continental breakfast Foyer 8h00-8h30 Working breakfast with Brad Seward, Mowat Centre Centre ballroom 8h45-10h00 Simultaneous sessions Center, East, or South ballrooms 10h00-10h30 Break Foyer 10h30-11h30 Keynote address by Nicole Fortin, UBC East ballroom 11h30-12h15 Lunch East ballroom 12h15-12h45 Special address by Anil Arora, Statistics Canada East ballroom 12h45-13h30 Poster session West ballroom 13h30-14h45 Simultaneous sessions Center, East, or South ballrooms 14h45-15h00 Break Foyer 15h00-16h15 Plenary session East ballroom 16h15-16h30 Poster awards and closing remarks East ballroom 5 Detailed conference program Wednesday, October 17 8h30-17h00 Preconference workshops McMaster University 8h30-9h00 Registration to the workshops and continental breakfast L.R. Wilson Hall, room 1003 New and forthcoming datasets in the RDCs (1) L.R. Wilson Hall, room TBA Employment and education 9h00-12h00 Spatial perspective and mapping: introduction to statistical analysis using R, ArcGIS Pro, and Insights for L.R. Wilson Hall, room TBA ArcGIS 12h00-13h00 Lunch (will be provided) L.R. Wilson Hall, room 1003 13h00-13h45 Gender-based analysis Plus and intersectionality L.R. Wilson Hall, room TBA Leveraging data at Indigenous Services Canada, Crown- 14h00-14h45 Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada L.R. Wilson Hall, room TBA New and forthcoming datasets in the RDCs (2) 15h00-17h00 Health and immigration L.R. Wilson Hall, room TBA Putting the squeeze on big data: using SAS to prepare 13h30-16h30 large datasets L.R. Wilson Hall, room TBA 18h00-21h00 Welcome reception Braley Health Centre Thursday, October 18 7h45-8h30 Registration and continental breakfast Foyer Working breakfast Centre ballroom 8h00-8h20 Pierre Turcotte, Status of Women Canada A Short Introduction to the Research Program at SWC Words of welcome East ballroom Mike Veall, Academic Director, McMaster RDC, 8h30-8h50 McMaster University Jim Dunn, Associate Vice-President Research (Acting), McMaster University Statistics Canada’s National Consultation Day East ballroom 8h50-9h00 Kelly Cranswick, Statistics Canada 6 Thursday, October 18 Session 1A Parents, children and schools Chair: TBA Marie Melanie Fontaine, Université du Québec à Montréal The Motherhood Penalty in Canada: Trends, Geographical Patterns and the Link with Family-Friendly Policies Kenny Chatoor, Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario Room TBA The Role of Parental Education on Postsecondary Participation and Labour Market Outcomes Ashley Calhoun, Western University Does Moving Matter? Measuring Residential Mobility on Children's Mental Health Outcomes Ricardo Meilman Cohn, Simon Fraser University Sorting, Peer Effects and School Effectiveness in Private and Public Schools Session 1B Aging and longevity Chair: TBA 9h00-10h30 Evelyn L. Forget, University of Manitoba Deaths of Despair Tammy Schirle, Wilfrid Laurier University The Evolution of Longevity: Evidence from Canada Room TBA Byron Spencer, McMaster University Age-Income Dynamics Over the Life Course: Cohort Transition Patterns Based on Canadian Tax Returns Sung-Hee Jeon, Statistics Canada The Impact of CardioVascular Health Shocks on Employment and Earnings Session 1C Long term impact of childhood Chair: Marisa Young, McMaster University Kathy Georgiades and Michael Boyle, McMaster University Prevalence of Mental Disorders and Service Contacts among Children and Youth in Ontario Jinette Comeau and Li Wang, McMaster University Room TBA Changes in Child Psychiatric Disorders and Need for Professional Help Between 1983 and 2014 in Ontario Kathryn Wiens, University of Toronto 7 Examining Joint Effects of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Mental Health Outcomes Zhiwei Gao, Memorial University Sex-Specific Association Between Childhood BMI Trajectories and Asthma Phenotypes 10h30-11h00 Break Foyer Thursday, October 18 Session 2A Changing Family Patterns Chair: TBA Lisa Strohschein, University of Alberta Teen pregnancy in Canada: A multidimensional life course approach Laura Wright, University of Saskatchewan Consequences of Teen Parenthood: Differences between Room TBA Teen Moms and Teen Dads in a Contemporary Canadian Cohort Anne Milan, Statistics Canada Diversity of lone mothers in Canada in the labour force Blandine Legendre, McGill University Exploring economic consequences
Recommended publications
  • Of Canada 2001
    4 THE CRIC PAPERS Portraits of Canada 2001 JANUARY 2002 Table of Contents 1 Preface 3 Highlights 4 Methodology 5 1. The Economy and the Quality of Life 7 2. Canada in a Changing World Ties to the US A Common Currency? Energy Policy Globalization 13 3. Immigration 16 4. Federalism and National Unity Equalization: A Commitment to Sharing the Wealth The Practice of Federalism: An Assessment Priorities for Change The Balance of Power Support for Sovereignty in Quebec 32 5. Official Languages 33 6. Aboriginal Peoples 35 7. Health Care and Social Programs The Surplus Health Care 40 8. Rural Canada 41 Conclusion Centre for Research and Information on Canada (CRIC) 2000 McGill College Avenue, Suite 250 Montréal, Quebec H3A 3H3 1-800-363-0963 Fax: (514) 843-4590 www.ccu-cuc.ca Ce document est aussi disponible en français. Preface latest Portraits of Canada offers Not so. The a clear picture of what unites Canadians, and what divides them. Portraits of Canada also reveals that in every part of the country, except Ontario and This annual tracking poll reveals broad areas Quebec, a majority feels that their province of agreement among Canadians on a wide neither gets the respect it deserves, nor variety of subjects that were in the news enjoys the influence that it should have. during the past year. In and of itself, this more negative con- It pinpoints established or emerging sensus considerably limits the impact of consensuses on: the abovementioned areas of agreement. • support for a common Canada-US currency But it highlights another major national • rejection of a continental energy policy consensus identified in this and other CRIC • the need to protect Canadian sovereignty polls: Canadians continue to demand, in in the face of globalization a forceful and sustained way, closer • support for equalization cooperation between the federal and • up to a certain point, the best means provincial governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Annualreport2015.Pdf
    WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING ABOUT OUR WORK “The Mowat Centre is leading the way on researching nudging and its effectiveness” Derek Sankey in The Calgary Herald, December 13 2014 On Public Service Transformed “Excellent primer on past and new Canadian infrastructure directions. The Mowat Centre continues on its excellent work” The Wilson Centre Canada Institute’s Beyond the Border Observer, August 6 2014 On Rebuilding Canada “A masterful survey of the fundamental economic issues of the corporate income tax” Alan Macnaughton (University of Waterloo) in The Canadian Tax Journal, Summer 2014 On Corporate Tax Reform “Particularly timely and well worth reading” Stephen Tapp (Research Director at the Institute for Research on Public Policy) in the Policy Options blog, February 18 2015 On Policymaking for the Sharing Economy “An important paper” The Governor General of Canada His Excellency the Right Honourable David Johnston, in a keynote address at the Great Lakes Economic Forum, April 28 2015 On The Vital Commons: A Policy Agenda for the Great Lakes Century Contents Mowat’s Impact Methodology 1 2014-15 By the Numbers 4 Publications 6 INTERGOvernmental ECONOMIC ANd SOCIAl POlicy 6 GOvERNMENT TRANSformation 13 Mowat NfP 16 Mowat energy 18 TldR 20 Public and Stakeholder Engagement 21 PUBlIC presentations 21 knowlEdGE TRANSfER activITIES 22 stakeholdER CONSUltations 23 Who is Using Our Work? 24 Year-End financial Statement 26 Mowat People (fellows, Advisory Board, Editorial Board) 27 director’s message In the following pages we present our 2014-15 annual report. We marked our sixth year with several accomplishments including some important policy wins, successful new initiatives, and impressive growth in our reach and recognition among stakeholders and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight Trudeau Without Cheers Assessing 10 Years of Intergovernmental Relations
    IRPP Harper without Jeers, Insight Trudeau without Cheers Assessing 10 Years of Intergovernmental Relations September 2016 | No. 8 Christopher Dunn Summary ■■ Stephen Harper’s approach to intergovernmental relations shifted somewhat from the “open federalism” that informed his initial years as prime minister toward greater multilateral engagement with provincial governments and certain unilateral moves. ■■ Harper left a legacy of smaller government and greater provincial self-reliance. ■■ Justin Trudeau focuses on collaboration and partnership, including with Indigenous peoples, but it is too early to assess results. Sommaire ■■ En matière de relations intergouvernementales, l’approche de Stephen Harper s’est progressivement éloignée du « fédéralisme ouvert » de ses premières années au pouvoir au profit d’un plus fort engagement multilatéral auprès des provinces, ponctué ici et là de poussées d’unilatéralisme. ■■ Gouvernement réduit et autonomie provinciale accrue sont deux éléments clés de l’héritage de Stephen Harper. ■■ Justin Trudeau privilégie la collaboration et les partenariats, y compris avec les peuples autochtones, mais il est encore trop tôt pour mesurer les résultats de sa démarche. WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS IN CANADA? Surprises. In October 2015, we had an election with a surprise ending. The Liberal Party, which had been third in the polls for months, won a clear majority. The new prime minister, Justin Trudeau, provided more surprises, engaging in a whirl- wind of talks with first ministers as a group and with social partners that the previous government, led by Stephen Harper, had largely ignored. He promised a new covenant with Indigenous peoples, the extent of which surprised even them. Change was in the air.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Policy in Crisis? Understanding Policy­Making in Canada
    PUBLIC POLICY IN CRISIS? UNDERSTANDING POLICY­MAKING IN CANADA UNE CRISE DES POLITIQUES PUBLIQUES ? COMMENT SE FONT LES POLITIQUES AU CANADA PROGRAMME Annual conference Conférence annuelle of the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada de l’Institut d’études canadiennes de McGill March 26 and 27, 2009 Du 26 au 27 mars 2009 McGill Faculty Club Faculty Club de McGill Montréal, Québec, Canada Montréal (Québec) Canada DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE MESSAGE DE LA DIRECTRICE Dear Friends and Colleagues, Chers amis et collègues, Welcome to the McGill Institute for the Study of Bienvenue à la conférence 2009 de l’Institut d’études Canada’s 2009 conference, Public Policy in Crisis? canadiennes de McGill : Une crise des politiques Understanding Policy‐Making in Canada. publiques ? Comment se font les politiques au Canada. Since 1995, the McGill Institute for the Study of L’Institut d’études canadiennes de McGill est fier Canada has been proud to convene annual d’organiser depuis 1995 des conférences annuelles visant conferences to foster informed, non‐partisan à promouvoir un débat informé et non‐partisan sur les discussions of issues affecting Canadians, ranging sujets qui concernent les Canadiens, comme les relations from Quebec‐Canada relations, Aboriginal issues, Québec‐Canada, les questions autochtones, la citizenship and health care to Canadian media, the citoyenneté et les soins de santé, ou encore les médias, la Charter, and cultural policy. These public events, Charte et la politique culturelle. Ces événements publics, designed to raise provocative questions and conçus pour soulever des questions stimulantes et encourage open debate, have brought together encourager un débat ouvert ont rassemblé des centaines hundreds of practitioners, academics, students, de praticiens, d’universitaires, d’étudiants et de politicians and engaged citizens, and have attracted politiciens ; ils ont suscité l’intérêt des citoyens et reçu national and international media coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 24 (2), 57–79
    The La Canadian Revue Journal canadienne of Program d’évaluation Evaluation de programme 34.2 Fall 2019 / automne 2019 Editor’s Remarks / Un mot de la rédactrice vii Isabelle Bourgeois ARTICLES Revisiting Contribution Analysis 171 John Mayne Self-Evaluation Tool for Action in Partnership: Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Original Quebec French Tool to Canadian English 192 Angèle Bilodeau and Gillian Kranias Comparison of Canadian and American Graduate Evaluation Education Programs 207 M. Theresa Hunter and James C. McDavid Évaluation de la mise en œuvre du programme d’intervention In vivo chez les jeunes de 11–12 ans d’une école primaire québécoise présentant un problème de comportements intériorisés : une étude exploratoire 235 Catherine Fréchette-Simard, Jonathan Bluteau et Isabelle Plante RESEARCH AND PRACTICE NOTES / NOTES SUR LA RECHERCHE ET LES MÉTHODES Dramatizing Learning, Performing Ourselves: Stories of Theatre-Based Evaluation in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside 255 Christopher Cook, Carolyn Camman, Andrew Leyland, Suzie O’Shea, and Angela Towle Applying the Collaborative Approaches to Evaluation (CAE) Principles in an Educational Evaluation: Reflections from the Field 272 Jeremy Acree THEME SEGMENT: DEMOCRACY AND EVALUATION / SEGMENT THÉMATIQUE : LA DÉMOCRATIE ET L’ÉVALUATION Démocratisation et efficience sont-elles antinomiques au niveau local? Le cas des réformes managériales des administrations publiques locales en Wallonie 282 Catherine Fallon “Deliverology” and Evaluation: A Tale of Two Worlds 303 Lisa Birch and
    [Show full text]
  • Mowat Centre ANNUAL REPORT 2011 – 2012 2 Mowat Centre
    MOWAT CENTRE ANNUAL REPORT 2011 – 2012 2 Mowat Centre DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE his report represents a milestone for the Mowat TCentre. It is our first annual report and its production signifies a more mature phase of our existence. As Mowat completes its third year, we are focused on sustaining our reputation and consolidating our growth. We are moving from our initial start-up phase, where our focus was producing and commu- nicating high quality applied public policy research, were identified in our report. We expect that this is- to the next stage of our organizational life. sue will continue to be a focus of public debate and further reforms will be forthcoming and the Mowat Within this new phase we will maintain our com- Centre will continue to deepen its expertise on mitment to quality and impact while investing issues relating to income security, unemployment more time and resources toward the profession- insurance, labour market training and the unique alization and development of our organization in ways these play out in different regions across the a manner that will support our growth over the country. medium- and long-term. Our research on voter equality has had an even The past three years have laid a strong foundation greater impact on policy debate, with many of our on which to build. The next challenge for Mowat is recommendations finding their way into new fed- to build on our organizational successes in order eral legislation. The work from the Mowat team has to ensure that we can withstand changes in leader- had a measurable impact on Canada’s move toward ship, personnel, governments and policy cycles – representation-by-population, and as federally- whenever they arise.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadawest FOUNDATION CANADA IS STRONGER WHEN the WEST IS THRIVING! the WEST in CANADA PROJECT
    THE WEST IN CANADA RESEARCH SERIES Whither Western Alienation? Shifting Patterns of Western Canadian Discontent with the Federal Government Loleen Berdahl, Ph.D. Research Fellow October 2010 Contents Key Findings Introduction Provincial Differences in Western Canadian Attitudes Toward the Federal Government Partisan Differences in Western Canadian Attitudes Toward the Federal Government The West in Context: National Attitudes Toward the Federal Government Conclusion CanadaWest FOUNDATION CANADA IS STRONGER WHEN THE WEST IS THRIVING! THE WEST IN CANADA PROJECT Canada is a wonderfully diverse country with its people spread across the second largest nation-state in the world. There are many things that tie us together as Canadians, but there is no doubt that each part of the country is unique and brings a different set of characteristics and perspectives to the national table. Understanding and integrating this diversity is a challenge as big as Canada itself. Western Canada—British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba—forms one of many distinct regions within Canada. The West is no more homogenous than any other region or sub-region, but there is an abundance of features that tie the four western provinces together in special ways. Shedding light on this region, communicating its frustrations and aspirations to the national community, seeking ways to build on the common ground found in the West, weaving the region into the national whole, and highlighting public policy innovation in the West are the goals of the West in Canada Project. The project, like Canada West Foundation, is based on the idea that strong and prosperous regions make for a strong and prosperous Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Easing Dissatisfaction with Canadian Federalism? the Promise of Disjointed Incrementalism
    Canadian Political Science Review 2(3) September 2008 Easing Dissatisfaction with Canadian Federalism? The Promise of Disjointed Incrementalism Éric Montpetit (Université de Montréal)1 Abstract This paper argues that the greatest threat to Canadian unity is not so much the absence of some of the characteristics that Daniel Kelemen claims are to be found in stable federations but the tendency of political leaders and parties to put forward contradicting “visions” of Canada. When such visions are used as templates for reforming the constitution, failures usually ensue. A strategy of disjointed incrementalism is a more prudent and ultimately more efficient way to proceed. It seems to be the strategy adopted by Prime Minister Harper and it could prove successful in easing some of the dissatisfactions experienced in both Quebec and western Canada. Introductioni With the election of the Conservative party in Ottawa in 2006 came the possibility that a way might be found to appease the uneasiness about Canadian federalism felt mainly in Quebec, but also in western Canada. Distancing himself from his adversaries, Prime Minister Harper promised to practice an “open federalism.” It is well known that past attempts to ease dissatisfaction with the federation failed partly because Westerners and Quebecers were unable to agree on a common vision of what Canada is or should be. Will Harper succeed where past attempts to change the Canadian federation failed? This article outlines a political strategy that should prove useful to politicians who, like Harper, seek to change Canadian federalism. It should be underlined that I come from a sub‐field of political science, administration and public policy, which has devoted little attention to Canada’s constitutional problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Umpire and Arbiter: Courts As Facilitators of Intergovernmental Dialogue in Division of Powers Cases in Canada
    Beyond Umpire and Arbiter: Courts as Facilitators of Intergovernmental Dialogue in Division of Powers Cases in Canada Wade Kenneth Wright Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of the Science of Law in the School of Law COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Wade Kenneth Wright All rights reserved ABSTRACT Beyond Umpire and Arbiter: Courts as Facilitators of Intergovernmental Dialogue in Division of Powers Cases in Canada Wade Kenneth Wright The courts in Canada have often been cast, by both courts and legal scholars, as ‘umpires’ or ‘arbiters’ of the federal-provincial division of powers – umpires or arbiters that have the exclusive, or at least decisive, authority to clarify and enforce, and resolve disputes about, ‘who does what’ in the federal system. However, the image conveyed by these metaphors underestimates the role that the federal and provincial political branches play in the federal system, by working out their own solutions, in the intergovernmental arena, both directly and indirectly, where questions and disputes arise about how jurisdiction is and should be allocated. The image conveyed by the umpire or arbiter metaphors also sits uncomfortably with the facilitative role that the Supreme Court of Canada has carved out for itself in its recent division of powers decisions, a role that casts the courts as facilitators of these instances of intergovernmental dialogue. This doctoral dissertation challenges, and moves beyond, the umpire and arbiter metaphors. It examines the political safeguards available to the provinces in Canada to prevent, or limit, perceived federal encroachments on provincial jurisdiction, in the process highlighting the role that the political branches play in Canada in working out their own allocations of jurisdiction, outside of the courts.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2003) $16,500
    Canadian Political Science Association BULLETIN Association canadienne de science politique Volume XXXII:1 June / juin 2003 Contents / Sommaire From the President / Le mot du président ............................................................................. 1 JEAN-PIERRE GABOURY, Parliamentary Internship Programme, Report 2002-2003 / Programme canadien de stage parlementaire, Rapport de 2002-2003 ............................. 5 ROBERT J. WILLIAMS, Ontario Legislature Internship Programme, Annual Report 2003 / Programme de stages à l'assemblée législative de l'Ontario, Rapport annuel 2003 ....... 10 MICHAEL HOWLETT, CHRISTIAN DUFOUR, et al., Canadian Journal of Political Science, Annual Report 2002 / Revue canadienne de science politique, Rapport annuel 2002... 13 Around the Departments / Les nouvelles des départements................................................ 27 Academic Positions Available / Offres d'emploi................................................................. 40 Calls for Papers / Appels de manuscrits.............................................................................. 45 Annonces diverses / Other Notices...................................................................................... 48 publisher/éditeur Association canadienne de science politique Canadian Political Science Association Information/Renseignements Telephone / Téléphone: 613-562-1202 Fax / Télécopieur: 613-241-0019 Electronic mail / Courrier électronique: [email protected] http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/ Le Bulletin est publié à tous les six mois,
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Notes Notes Biographiques
    BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES NOTES BIOGRAPHIQUES SPEAKERS, CHAIRS and KEYNOTES CONFÉRENCIERS, MODÉRATEURS et CONFÉRENCIERS D’HONNEUR AUDETTE-LONGO, Trish BARNEY, Darin journalist, researcher Canada Research Chair in Technology and Citizenship, Department of Art Trish Audette-Longo is a History and Communication Studies, doctoral student in the McGill University Department of Communication Studies at Concordia University. The focus of her research is on how First Nations and Métis communities Darin Barney is Canada Research Chair situated closest to Alberta's oil sands, and along in Technology & Citizenship, and Associate Professor at potential pipeline routes through British Columbia, use McGill University. He is the author of Communication media to express a variety of health, cultural, and conservation concerns in connection to bitumen Technology: The Canadian Democratic Audit; The extraction, locally-driven economic growth, and Network Society; and Prometheus Wired: The Hope for community sustainability. Prior to undertaking doctoral Democracy in the Age of Network Technology. He studies, she worked as a reporter at The Edmonton received the inaugural Social Sciences and Humanities Journal (2005-2012). Her last newsroom post was as Research Council of Canada Aurora Prize for environment reporter, during which time she covered outstanding contribution to Canadian intellectual life by hearings into the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline a new researcher and was selected in 2004 as a “Leader proposed to carry Alberta oil west to tankers at Kitimat, B.C. of Tomorrow” by the Partnership Group for Science and Engineering. He has served on the Advisory Council of the Law Commission of Canada, as Chair of the Department of Art History & Communication Studies at BAKER, Janelle McGill, and as President of the Canadian Instructor, Athabasca University, Communication Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy, Donald Trump and the Canada-US Security Community
    Canadian Journal of Political Science (2020), 1–21 doi:10.1017/S0008423920000542 RESEARCH ARTICLE/ÉTUDE ORIGINALE Democracy, Donald Trump and the Canada-US Security Community Wilfrid Greaves* Wilfrid Greaves, Department of Political Science, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Rd., Victoria, BC V8P5C2 *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract This article examines Canada-US relations through their shared membership in a plural- istic security community (PSC). While the bilateral relationship has been turbulent for decades, the Trump presidency has damaged the Canada-US PSC by (1) exacerbating a decades-long trend of weakened shared identity and mutual trust between Canadians and Americans, and (2) undermining the democratic norms and institutions that uphold American domestic stability and Canadians’ expectations of peaceful change. Assessing the combined implications of the decline in shared identity, mutual trust and democratic stability, I argue that the Canada-US PSC cannot endure if the United States does not also consider Canada’s national and security interests or if the United States itself poses a threat to those interests. Given current trends, the future absence of war in North America may reflect American domination over a weaker and dependent Canada rather than their continued membership in a bilateral PSC. Résumé Cet article examine les relations canado-américaines à travers leur appartenance à une communauté pluraliste de la securité (CPS). Alors que les relations bilatérales ont été mouvementées pendant des décennies, la présidence Trump a porté préjudice à la CPS Canada-États-Unis 1) en exacerbant une tendance à l’affaiblissement de l’identité commune et de la confiance mutuelle entre Canadiens et Américains qui dure depuis des décennies, et 2) en sapant les normes et institutions démocratiques qui soutiennent la stabilité intérieure américaine et les attentes des Canadiens en matière de changement pacifique.
    [Show full text]