Managing Travel Demand Applying European Perspectives to U.S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Annual Report 2011
Driving your ambitions We provide coverage and promote business development for more than 25,000 enterprises in Italy and the world Our journey into the world of the SACE Group begins here. Together we explore the activities, initiatives and results of 2011, a year of challenges and new horizons, illustrated by photos taken by our staff, along with their stories and our customers’ stories. TRAVELOGUE Economic framework 11 Products and services 27 Strategy and results 55 The SACE Group: who we are 75 Corporate governance 91 Up in the air with ATR In 2011 SACE guaranteed more than €280 million in loans for the acquisition of 42 passenger aircraft built by ATR, a joint venture between Alenia Aermacchi and Eads. ATR is one of the world’s leading aerospace companies and the biggest manufacturer of regional aircraft. HIGHLIGHTS € millions Gross written premiums 442.3 Claims paid 112.5 Profit after tax 139.5 Shareholders’ equity 6,202 Technical provisions 2,342 Outstanding commitments SACE 33,928 SACE BT 36,850 SACE Fct 1,220 Customers 25,800 e are living in a time of epic changes. Since 2007, the far Wreaching crisis has accelerated the process of rewriting global dynamics, overtur- ning long-standing convictions and returning the question of risk to centre-stage for all economic operators. Developed markets can no longer be considered to be “safe havens”. Geopolitical tensions continue to cause concern in various regions of the world, such as the Middle East, North Africa, Latin Ameri- ca and the Commonwealth of Independent States, and emerging markets are showing signs of scaling down their growth projections. -
How to Enhance Walking and Cycling Instead of Shorter Car Trips and to Make These Modes Safer
Deliverable D6 How to enhance WALking and CYcliNG instead of shorter car trips and to make these modes safer Public WALCYNG Contract No: UR-96-SC.099 Project Coordinator: Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, University of Lund, Sweden Partners: FACTUM Chaloupka, Praschl & Risser OHG Franco Gnavi and Carlo Bonanni City of Helsinki, City Planning Office Institute of Transport Economics Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki Instituto de Tráfico y Seguridad Vial (INTRAS), University of Valencia TransportTechnologie-Consult Karlsruhe GmbH Dutch Pedestrian Association "De Voetgangersvereniging" Chalmers University of Technology AB (Associated Contractor) Date: 15.1.1999 PROJECT FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION UNDER THE TRANSPORT RTD PROGRAMME OF THE 4th FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Deliverable D6 WALCYNG How to enhance WALking and CYcliNG instead of shorter car trips and to make these modes safer Public Hydén, C., Nilsson, A. & Risser, R. Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, University of Lund, Sweden & FACTUM Chaloupka, Praschl & Risser OHG, Vienna, Austria 6. Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Liisa Hakamies-Blomqvist, Finland 7. INTRAS, University of Valencia, Enrique J. Carbonell Vayá, Beatriz Martín, Spain 8. Transport Technologie-Consult Karlsruhe GmbH (former Verkehrs-Consult Karlsruhe), Rainer Schneider, Germany 9. De Voetgangersvereniging, Willem Vermeulen, The Netherlands 10. Road and Traffic Planning Department, Chalmers University of Technology AB, Olof Gunnarsson, Sweden TABLE OF CONTENTS -
Useful Informatin
How to get Rome from the “Leonardo Da Vinci” Fiumicino Airport The main airport Leonardo da Vinci (Fiumicino) is located about 26 km from the city centre. The centre of city is easily reached: FROM AND TO FIUMICINO AIRPORT BY TRAIN At the airport’s railway station the Shuttle-Train Leonardo Express direct service (without calling at other stations) takes just 31 minutes to get to Termini Station (intersecting with the Metro Lines A & B) and leaves every half hour from 6.36 a.m. to 11.36 p.m. FROM AND TO FIUMICINO BY TAXI Taxis licensed by Rome City Council are white and have a sign bearing the word “TAXI” on their roofs and by the identifying licence number on the doors, on the back and inside the car. The symbol of the Rome City Council is clearly visible on the front doors and the license inside the back left. Other vehicles waiting on exiting the airport may well be driven by unauthorized persons and the fare could therefore be a great deal higher. Taxis for Rome are found at the exits of both the domestic and international arrival terminals. Fares: • to and from Fiumicino Airport – Ostiense Railway Station €45 • to and from Fiumicino Airport – The Aurelian Wall €48 • to and from Fiumicino Airport – Tiburtina Railway Station €55 A maximum fare of €70 has moreover been set for journeys starting from inside the Rome Ring Road (Grande Raccordo Anulare) and heading to Fiumicino airport in the event that the taxi metre should display a higher sum. The number to dial a taxi is: +39 06 0609 / +39 06 3570 Click for further information: http://www.3570.it http://www.agenziamobilita.roma.it/en/app.html http://www.agenziamobilita.roma.it/en/taxi-fares-in-rome.html Events srl Congress&Communication – Via Mantegna 1, 60019 Senigallia (AN) P.I./C.F. -
Sustainable Urban Mobility and Public Transport in Unece Capitals
UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN UNECE CAPITALS UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN UNECE CAPITALS This publication is part of the Transport Trends and Economics Series (WP.5) New York and Geneva, 2015 ©2015 United Nations All rights reserved worldwide Requests to reproduce excerpts or to photocopy should be addressed to the Copyright Clearance Center at copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to: United Nations Publications, 300 East 42nd St, New York, NY 10017, United States of America. Email: [email protected]; website: un.org/publications United Nations’ publication issued by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Maps and country reports are only for information purposes. Acknowledgements The study was prepared by Mr. Konstantinos Alexopoulos and Mr. Lukasz Wyrowski. The authors worked under the guidance of and benefited from significant contributions by Dr. Eva Molnar, Director of UNECE Sustainable Transport Division and Mr. Miodrag Pesut, Chief of Transport Facilitation and Economics Section. ECE/TRANS/245 Transport in UNECE The UNECE Sustainable Transport Division is the secretariat of the Inland Transport Committee (ITC) and the ECOSOC Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods and on the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals. -
Public Transport
Public Transport Submission David Kilsby February 2009 Prepared for: Prepared by: Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport (RRAT) Standing Kilsby Australia Pty Ltd Cmomittee ACN 092 084 743 inquiry into Public Transport 20/809 Pacific Highway Department of the Senate Chatswood PO Box 6100 NSW 2067 Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 +61 2 9415 4544 www.kilsby.com.au Public Transport Contents Page 1.1.1. SUMMARYSUMMARY................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ................................... 111 2.2.2. CREDENTIALS ................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ................................................................................................ ....................... 222 3.3.3. PEAK OIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTTRANSPORT................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................... 444 4.4.4. TERMS OF REFERENCE ................................................................................... ............................................................................................... -
Report on Conclusions and Recommendations & Policy
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH & ENERGY, ENVIROMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES MIRACLES Project GRD1 – 2001 – 40047 Rome Winchester Barcelona Cork Deliverable D2.3 and D1.7 REPORT ON CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS & POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS Version N°4.1 Dec 2006 MIRACLES DELIVERABLE n°1.7 & 2.3 Workpackage 1 and 2 / Version 4.1 / December 2006 Classification This report is: Draft Final X Internal Public X Editors Chiara Di Majo, Katya Morton; Simon Hayes; Andy Wren; Contributors Maria Vittoria Corazza, Mike McDonald, Antonio Musso, Fabio Nussio, Don O’Cinneide, Andy Richards, Issue Date Version 1 1/6/06 Version 2 7/11/06 Version 3 14/11/06 Version 4 1/12/06 Version 4.1 11/12/06 MIRACLES Project Office ATAC – Sviluppo Attività Internazionali – Via Ostiense 131/L 00154 Roma Tel: +39 06 4695 9621 Fax: +39 06 04695 9547 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.miraclesproject.org Conclusions and Policy Reccommendations - 1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS Background.......................................................................................................................... - 3 - 1.1 The CIVITAS Initiative: a mix of policies and technology............................. - 3 - 1.2 MIRACLES and the CIVITAS Initiative and the policy approach ................ - 4 - 1.3 The Cities and the Integrated Approach ......................................................... - 6 - 1.3.1 Rome ............................................................................................................ - 7 - 1.3.2 Winchester .................................................................................................. -
Submissions from Rural and Metropolitan Councils
Municipal Association of Victoria Subm ission to the Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Com m ittee Inquiry into future oil supply and alternative transport fuels February 2006 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................2 Local Government Context ..........................................................................................2 Options for Reducing Transport Fuel Demand ............................................................3 Encouragement of Alternative Transport Options ....................................................3 Land Use Planning and Transport Options ..............................................................4 Commonwealth Government Support of Public Transport.......................................5 Removal of Taxation Incentive to Consume Petroleum ...........................................6 Alternative Fuel Sources ..............................................................................................7 Government Policy to Promote Alternative Fuel Sources ........................................8 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................9 6 Introduction Local government in Victoria has a significant interest in transport through its direct provision of transport assets, such as roads, and its statutory and strategic land use planning responsibilities. In addition, local government is also -
Questions to the Mayor
Written Answers to questions not answered at Mayor’s Question Time on 14 October 2009 South London Line Question No: 2651 / 2009 Jenny Jones Will you express your support for the retention of the South London rail service from Victoria to London Bridge via Denmark Hill, and oppose any reduction in this service that is carried out for financial reasons rather than capacity reasons? Oral response given Missing Updates Question No: 2932 / 2009 John Biggs Are there any unusual, novel, or contentious issues that have arisen since the last Mayor’s Question Time meeting, which you have failed to include in either your last written report or your oral update today? Oral response given Limousines and chauffeurs for the Met’s senior officers Question No: 2939 / 2009 Dee Doocey Following your comments at last months MQT, where you said that cars that ferry around Ministers, civil servants, and other people on the ‘taxpayer’s payroll’ should be got rid of, will you be taking action to abolish limousines and chauffeurs for senior MPS officers? Oral response given London Plan Question No: 3106 / 2009 Steve O’Connell What does the Mayor consider to be the most important aspects of the latest draft of the London Plan and how do they reflect his priorities for London? Oral response given 1 Young People Question No: 2745 / 2009 Joanne McCartney What recent initiatives have you delivered for young people in London? Oral response given Congestion Charge Question No: 3072 / 2009 Victoria Borwick Further to your answers to questions 3014/2008 and 1053/2009 on helping the retail economy the Mayor said he would re-look at bringing forward the post-Christmas Congestion Charge-free days to before Christmas. -
Sustainable Mobility TII Position Paper
Sustainable Mobility TII Position Paper November 2020 Contents 1 | Introduction 3 2 | Definition of Sustainable Mobility 4 3 | Current Issues 6 3.1 Transport Inequity 6 3.2 Severance and Poor Permeability 6 4 | Vision for Sustainable Mobility 7 4.1 Planning 7 4.2 Multi-Modal Travel 9 4.3 Demand Management 14 4.4 Expanding Data Collection 14 4.5 Collaboration 15 5 | Summary 16 2 1 | Introduction TII’s purpose is to provide sustainable transport infrastructure transport in Ireland. and services, delivering a better quality of life, supporting economic growth and respecting the environment. In fulfilling The purpose of this paper is to outline TII’s position on this purpose, TII strive to be leaders in the delivery and Sustainable Mobility, in terms of: operation of sustainable transport infrastructure and to ensure – The importance of sustainable mobility; that Ireland’s national road and light rail infrastructure is safe and resilient, delivering sustainability mobility for people and – The current issues that need to be overcome to provide for goods. Sustainability is one TII’s core values that permeate sustainable mobility; and our way of working, playing our part in addressing the climate – The vision for what sustainable mobility can be and can and biodiversity crisis. This purpose, vision and value is deliver, and key themes through which it can be achieved. set out in the TII Statement of Strategy 2021 to 2025 which makes an overt commitment to supporting the transition to Sustainable mobility is a complicated, multi-faceted issue a low-carbon and climate resilient future, through enabling and this paper is not intended to address every single active travel and prioritising sustainability in decision making, element of the topic. -
Congestion Reduction in Europe: Advancing Transport Efficiency
Congestion Reduction in Europe: Advancing Transport Efficiency MG-5.3-2014 Tackling urban road congestion D5.1 A long term analysis of traffic congestion and car use reduction in major European cities: what policies and measures worked? WP5 - Combating congestion and reducing levels of car use in European cities: strategies, business models and guidelines Due date of deliverable: Month 30 – November 2017 Actual submission date: Month 36 – May 2018 Start date of project: June 1st 2015 Duration: 36 months Author: Paul Curtis Lead beneficiary for this deliverable: Vectos Dissemination Level: PU Table of contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Objective ................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Combining measures....................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Types of measures ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 External factors ................................................................................................................................. 8 2. Measure mixing in the -
(Draft Transport Strategy) Statement of Consultation
Stevenage Borough Council Future Town Future Transport 2018 (Draft Transport Strategy) Statement of Consultation (2019) I Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 What is a Statement of Consultation? ................................................................................... 3 What is Future Town, Future Transport? .............................................................................. 3 2.0 The Consultation ............................................................................................................. 4 Draft Transport Strategy ........................................................................................................ 4 Liveable Streets Survey .......................................................................................................... 4 Responses .............................................................................................................................. 5 3.0 Consultation Responses .................................................................................................. 6 Key Themes of Responses to the draft Transport Strategy ................................................... 6 Outcomes of Meetings with Employers .............................................................................. 13 Survey Results and Liveable Street Trial Nominations ........................................................ 14 4.0 How we incorporated the responses -
Vehicles and Infrastructure the Fourth of Eight Reports from the Transport Visions Network
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UWE Bristol Research Repository Transport Visions Vehicles and Infrastructure The fourth of eight reports from the Transport Visions Network Authors Greg Marsden, Glenn Lyons, Mark Beecroft and Kiron Chatterjee Transportation Research Group, University of Southampton Editorial Board Jennifer Abley Cranfield University Mags Adams Lancaster University Simon Barnett Suffolk County Council Gary Burnett University of Nottingham Ali Clabburn Liftshare.com Richard Clegg University of York Matthew Frost Nottingham Trent University Simon Hubbard Peter Brett Associates Toby Rackliff Dumfries and Galloway Council Andrew Salkeld Leicester City Council The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund and the Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, as sponsors of the Transport Visions Network, are very gratefully acknowledged. The views of individuals conveyed in this report are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of their respective employers. TRANSPORT VISIONS Vehicles and Infrastructure 1 Published by Landor Publishing Ltd Quadrant House 250 Kennington Lane London SE11 5RD First published February 2002 © Landor Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. ISBN 1 899650 28 8 No responsibility for any loss as a consequence of any person relying upon the information or the views contained in this publication is accepted by the authors, contributors, or publishers. TRANSPORT VISIONS Vehicles and Infrastructure 2 Contents Preface ................................................................................5 Introduction........................................................................9 1. Today's Vehicles and Infrastructure ............................ 13 2. Tomorrow's Vehicles and Infrastructure..................... 23 3. A Vision: Control Culture............................................