DOCSLIB.ORG

Effective Road and Traffic Management: Memoranda Received

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Effective Road and Traffic Management: Memoranda Received This bundle: 55 & 56 Effective road and traffic management: Memoranda Received No. Author 28 National Grid plc 01 Leornard Wells 28a Supplementary from National Grid plc 02 David Nelsey 29 National Joint Utilities Group (NJUG) 03 English Heritage 29a Supplementary from NJUG 04 Ken Todd 30 Stagecoach Group plc 05 Urban Traffic Management & Control (UTMC) 31 Road Haulage Association (RHA) 05a Supplementary from UTMC and the IHE 32 Capita Symonds 06 Intelligent Transport Systems (UK) 33 Donald Bowler 06a Supplementary from ITS (UK) 34 Stephen Plowden 07 Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) 35 City of London Corporation 08 David Metz 36 Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport (CILT) 09 London TravelWatch 36a Supplementary from CILT 10 Passenger Focus 37 Jonathan Smith 11 Surrey County Council 38 Tony Wyer 12 ADEPT 39 Institution of Engineering and Technology 13 Cambridge Cycling Campaign 40 Transport Planning Society 14 Institute of Highway Engineers (IHE) 41 AA 15 Martin Cassini 42 Joint Authorities Group (UK) 16 Passenger Transport Executive Group (pteg) 43 CTC, the national cyclists' organisation 16a Supplementary from pteg 44 Halcrow 17 RAC Foundation 45 Chris Leithead 18 Campaign for Better Transport 46 Sustrans 19 liftshare 47 Freight Transport Association (FTA) 20 MIRA 48 Living Streets 21 Local Government Technical Advisers Group 49 Motorcycle Action Group (UK) 22 Chartered Institute of Highways and Transport 50 Cadence Driver Development 23 Network Rail 51 Motor Cycle Industry Association (MCI) 24 Kapsch TrafficCom 52 Greater London Authority 25 Department for Transport 53 Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) 26 Michael Coles 54 London Councils 26a Further evidence from Michael Coles 55 Cycle Sheffield 27 Green Light Group (GLG) 56 Nottinghamshire County Council Written evidence from Leonard Wells (ETM 01) I am a 70 year old pensioner. I spent a great deal of my life as a Professional Driver. The bulk of those years (18 in all) were spent driving the family limousine in to London from a country estate in Virginia Water, in and around the London area itself and then home again in the evening. During the early years in the 1980’s it would often take us up to 2 hours to get home in the evening using a combination of the A30 and the A4 during the rush hour. This went on for many years and I closely studied the causes and pondered on possible solutions. It immediately became apparent to me that the bulk of the hold ups were related to illegal and obstructive parking along the main arteries into and out of London. Exiting from London on the A4 there are stretches of 2 and 3 ‘A’ road lanes and 2 and 3 Motorway lanes. All that was needed in London to cause a major delay in the flow of traffic was a car parked on one of the 2 or 3 lane stretches of the ‘A’ roads. For some reason the British Motorists seem to find great difficulty in dealing with switching from 3 lanes to 2 and there never appeared to be any Traffic Wardens available to do anything about the problem. I sat down for many evenings and devised a solution. What I came up with I called Green Routes. I have worked in various Government Departments over the years and had heard that Mrs. Thatcher had a reputation for getting things done. I therefore set out my scheme in the fullest detail and sent it to her. I heard no more until the Government announced the scheme we know today as Red Routes. This was precisely the scheme I had outlined –even down to motorised Traffic Wardens –or as they are sometimes referred to as Environmental Protections Officers. Since I asked for no reward or acclaim for my efforts I thought no more about it –though today I am much more cautious in sending details of any such scheme of mine –in any field – without being aware of what had previously transpired. NOW I will come down to the point of my email. Whilst Red Routes is still a valid system, the bulk of our roads are still subject to enormous delays –resulting in frustration for motorists, bus drivers, truck drivers and bus passengers. The bulk of the journeys made on our roads are in fact made on ‘A’ roads which before Motorways were the best available at the time. The problem today with the advance of car ownership is that many of those ‘A’ roads are reduced in their capacity by selfish parking on the part of millions of car and van owners-at least during daylight hours. I now make use of my bus pass so am able to see these problems at first hand. I will just give one particular example. On the A680 between my home town of Haslingden and Accrington the buses are constantly having to stop because the road ahead has been reduced to a single lane by car owners parking at their front door. They do this in many cases, despite having an empty driveway or a nearby side street or cul de sac. This is a tiny sample of what happens on a daily basis from 0700 right round until 1900 on just this one 5 mile stretch of A road. The cost to our local Bus Company alone must be enormous in terms of extra fuel used and unnecessary wear and tear. My estimate of the amount of fuel wasted by all kinds of traffic because so many roads are reduced in this unnecessary and selfish manner is probably in the order of a billion litres per year. In our area one rarely sees a traffic warden outside of the town centres. In London you have only to park with one wheel on a pavement and you can guarantee that your car will be towed away and will cost a hefty sum to have it released back to you. Unfortunately, in this area you can seemingly park anywhere –including entirely on the pavement- with total impunity. Now- the only way to deal with this problem is to make daytime parking on any ‘A’ road an offence of obstruction. Time after time our local Traffic Warden –when he appears- tells me he can’t do anything about parking on a pavement or causing an obstruction as that is a Police matter. In addition he or she is very often unable to do anything about parking illegally on yellow lines because the County Council –having painted those lines- has not put up the appropriate sign. My own view is that the Police should be responsible for ensuring the free movement of traffic through their area. For example, one often comes across temporary traffic lights which are wrongly phased and causing huge delays. If the Police took full responsibility in such matters they could immediately request the owner of those lights to readjust them- removing the bottleneck at a stroke. The overall savings to our Nation would far outweigh any additional costs arising from the regular patrols by Traffic Police. It could be done in fact by motorised Traffic Wardens specialising in obstruction infringements. But they must have the authority to deal with cases of Obstruction. Well, thank you Committee members for your time and I hope that I have been of assistance. November 2010 Written evidence from David Nelsey (ETM 02) This is my submission to the Transport Committee who will undertake an inquiry into effective road and traffic management, I am a simple motorist who has travelled the roads of Britain on average 35,000 miles a year for the last 20 years. I guess many of the Ministers, Members of the Transport Committee and Civil Servants who frame our legislation either do not travel by car or very rarely travel by car. It's time the day to day motorist had influence. How to ease congestion on our roads is really quite simple if you know the problems. Here are some workable suggestions to implement in Law. 1) Scrap Bus Lanes. They give priority to empty buses over the mass population, whilst they queue behind lines of traffic. Buses are inherently bad for the environment. Yet we allow them the take up valuable space which can be used to reduce congestion for Cars. 2) If it is seen to be politically incorrect to totally scrap Bus Lanes then implement, by Law, a system that allow Bus Lanes only between the hours of 07:00 & 09:00 and then 16:30 till 19:00 on Mondays to Fridays only. Why oh why do local councils have bus lanes during the day and on Saturday & Sunday? Political Correctness !!! 3) In roadworks on Motorways and Duel Carriageways limit HGV, Trailers and Large Vans to Lane 1 (currently allowed in Lanes 1 & 2.) Normally there is a 50mph speed limit through these roadworks. Why do Trucks etc need the extra Lane? They cause tailbacks and congestion and frustration to cars etc when they 'elephant race'. 4) Enforce the 50mph speed limit in roadworks particularly to Trucks who regularly tail gate law abiding motorists by trying to maintain 56mph. Do they have some secret law allowing them to do this? 5) On Motorways and Dual Carriageways limit trucks, HGV.s etc to Lane 1 during the same hours as Bus Lanes. (This happens extensively across europe and it works). Again it prevents trucks trying to 'elephant race' (The truck in lane 1 might be doing 55mph. The one overtaking in Lane 2 is limited to 56mph). What happens? motorists are limited to Lane 3 and congestion and frustration occurs. 6) On Motorways and Dual Carriage ways limit Trucks, HGV.s etc to Lane 1 on hills and inclines ALL DAY.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Archive and Digital Asset Repository
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Oxford Brookes University: RADAR RADAR Research Archive and Digital Asset Repository Ward, S. (2017) 'Colin Buchanan's American Journey', Town Planning Review, 88 (2), pp. 201-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2017.13 This document is the authors’ Accepted Manuscript. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Available from RADAR: https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/72ee92f0-fe9a-49fd-9b1d-7f86d6c61059/1/ Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners unless otherwise waved in a license stated or linked to above. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Colin Buchanan’s American Journey Stephen V. Ward School of the Built Environment Oxford Brookes University Headington Oxford OX3 OBP, UK [email protected] 1 Colin Buchanan’s American Journey Introduction In Autumn 1962, the British planner, Colin Buchanan, made an extensive eight-week tour of the United States. His purpose was professional and official, part of a major British government study to find appropriate planning responses to the long term problems of urban motor traffic. Buchanan’s intention was to learn and draw lessons from American experiences that could be applied to Britain, then becoming a mass motorised society.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility in Cities: Transport and Urban Form
    NCE Cities – Paper 03 ACCESSIBILITY IN CITIES: TRANSPORT AND URBAN FORM Lead Authors: Philipp Rode and Graham Floater Contributing Authors: Nikolas Thomopoulos, James Docherty, Peter Schwinger, Anjali Mahendra, Wanli Fang LSE Cities Research Team: Bruno Friedel, Alexandra Gomes, Catarina Heeckt, Roxana Slavcheva The New Climate Economy Page CONTENTS The New Climate Economy (NCE) is the flagship project of the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate. It was established by seven countries, Colombia, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Norway, South Korea, Sweden and 1 INTRODUCTION 03 the United Kingdom, as an independent initiative to examine how countries can achieve economic growth while dealing with the risks posed by climate change. The NCE Cities Research Programme is led by LSE Cities at the 2 ACCESSIBILITY IN CITIES AND 04 London School of Economics. The programme includes a consortium of IMPLICATIONS FOR researchers from the Stockholm Environment Institute, the ESRC Centre CARBON EMISSIONS for Climate Change Economics and Policy, the World Resources Institute, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, and Oxford Economics. The NCE Cities Research Programme is directed by Graham Floater and Philipp Rode. 3 ASSESSMENT 11 4 PATTERNS, TRENDS AND 19 ABSTRACT TIPPING POINTS This paper focusses on one central aspect of urban 5 ACCESSIBILITY THROUGH 32 development: transport and urban form and how the two COMPACT CITIES shape the provision of access to people, goods and services, AND SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT and information in cities. The more efficient this access, the greater the economic benefits through economies of scale, agglomeration effects and networking advantages. This 6 CONCLUSIONS 40 paper discusses how different urban accessibility pathways impact directly on other measures of human development BIBLIOGRAPHY 42 and environmental sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Transport Systems in the UK
    The history of transport systems in the UK Future of Mobility: Evidence Review Foresight, Government Office for Science The history of transport systems in the UK Professor Simon Gunn Centre for Urban History, University of Leicester December 2018 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr Aaron Andrews for his help with the research for this review, especially for creating the graphs, and Georgina Lockton for editing. The review has benefited from the input of an Advisory Group consisting of Professor Colin Divall (University of York); Professor Gordon Pirie (University of Cape Town); Professor Colin Pooley (Lancaster University); Professor Geoff Vigar (University of Newcastle). I thank them all for taking time to read the review at short notice and enabling me to draw on their specialist expertise. Any errors remaining are, of course, mine. This review has been commissioned as part of the UK government’s Foresight Future of Mobility project. The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent those of any government or organisation. This document is not a statement of government policy. This report has an information cut-off date of February 2018. The history of transport systems in the UK Executive summary The purpose of this review is to summarise the major changes affecting transport systems in the UK over the last 100 years. It is designed to enable the Foresight team to bring relevant historical knowledge to bear on the future of transport and mobility. The review analyses four aspects of transport and mobility across the twentieth century. The first section identifies significant points of change in the main transport modes.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Traffic Neighbourhoods Residents Survey
    Low Traffic Neighbourhoods Residents' Survey Report January 2021 Tracy Logan, Rob McPhedran, Amy Young, Emily King Contents Background and methodology 3 Background 3 Survey and sample methodology 6 A note on survey timing 6 Weighting 7 Notes on analysis 8 Area and LSOA subgroups 8 Social Grade definition 9 Business owners 9 Respondents with mobility issues 9 Mode of transport sub-group definitions 10 Executive Summary 11 Views on government action in local neighbourhoods 11 Support for the reduction of road traffic and the reallocation of space for walking and cycling 11 Perceived problems in local areas 12 Awareness of and support for local LTN 12 Support for wider implementation of LTNs across England 13 Perceived impact of local LTN 14 Views on government action in local neighbourhoods 15 Support for reduction of road traffic 18 Support for reallocation of road space for walking and cycling 21 Perceived problems in local areas 24 Awareness of and support for local LTN 27 Support for local LTN 28 Impact of local LTN 31 Frequency of transport use and visits to local businesses 38 Support for implementing LTNs more widely 42 Business Owner residents 44 Appendix 48 Questionnaire – online version 48 © Kantar 2020 1 Background and methodology Background In May 2020, the Secretary of State for Transport announced the Emergency Active Travel Fund, which included funding allocations for emergency active travel schemes for local authorities. Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) offer a cost-effective way of delivering safe streets for walking and cycling. LTNs work by minimising through-traffic from using residential neighbourhoods to avoid main roads, while still retaining local access for residents, visitors and emergency vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking in the Modern City: Pedestrian Experiences of Post-War Birmingham
    Centre for Environment and Society Research Working Paper series no. 23 Walking in the Modern city: pedestrian experiences of post-war Birmingham David Adams Walking in the Modern city: pedestrian experiences of post- war Birmingham David Adams Lecturer in Planning Birmingham School of the Built Environment, Birmingham City University Working Paper Series, no. 22 2013 ISBN 978-1-904839-73-6 © Author, 2013 Published by Birmingham City University Centre for Environment and Society Research Faculty of Technology, Engineering and the Environment City Centre campus, Millennium Point, Curzon Street, Birmingham, B4 7XG, UK iii CONTENTS Abstract iv Introduction 1 Post-war Birmingham and pedestrian movement 2 Research context and methods 5 Experiences of walking in the reconstructed city 6 Pedestrian mobilities and vehicular traffic 6 Spaces for leisured activities 8 Legacies of the past, and altered routines 10 Conclusion 12 References 14 Illustrations Figure 1 Smallbrook Ringway under construction c. 1960 3 Figure 2. Aerial perspective of the Bull Ring, c. 1964 9 Figure 3 The new Bullring 11 iv Abstract Whilst the act of walking has been a central focus of many authors in their attempts to comprehend the effects of modernisation processes on everyday life in the city, there has been little empirical exploration of the relationship between how pedestrian practices were imagined and proposed by post-war planners / architects and how they were experienced ‘on the ground’ by local inhabitants. Drawing on research conducted in Birmingham – a city radically reconstructed with vehicular rather than pedestrian movement in mind – this paper uses a series of oral testimonies with local residents to highlight their different experiences of living with the reality of a city designed around the needs of motorised traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions to the Mayor
    Written Answers to questions not answered at Mayor’s Question Time on 14 October 2009 South London Line Question No: 2651 / 2009 Jenny Jones Will you express your support for the retention of the South London rail service from Victoria to London Bridge via Denmark Hill, and oppose any reduction in this service that is carried out for financial reasons rather than capacity reasons? Oral response given Missing Updates Question No: 2932 / 2009 John Biggs Are there any unusual, novel, or contentious issues that have arisen since the last Mayor’s Question Time meeting, which you have failed to include in either your last written report or your oral update today? Oral response given Limousines and chauffeurs for the Met’s senior officers Question No: 2939 / 2009 Dee Doocey Following your comments at last months MQT, where you said that cars that ferry around Ministers, civil servants, and other people on the ‘taxpayer’s payroll’ should be got rid of, will you be taking action to abolish limousines and chauffeurs for senior MPS officers? Oral response given London Plan Question No: 3106 / 2009 Steve O’Connell What does the Mayor consider to be the most important aspects of the latest draft of the London Plan and how do they reflect his priorities for London? Oral response given 1 Young People Question No: 2745 / 2009 Joanne McCartney What recent initiatives have you delivered for young people in London? Oral response given Congestion Charge Question No: 3072 / 2009 Victoria Borwick Further to your answers to questions 3014/2008 and 1053/2009 on helping the retail economy the Mayor said he would re-look at bringing forward the post-Christmas Congestion Charge-free days to before Christmas.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicles and Infrastructure the Fourth of Eight Reports from the Transport Visions Network
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UWE Bristol Research Repository Transport Visions Vehicles and Infrastructure The fourth of eight reports from the Transport Visions Network Authors Greg Marsden, Glenn Lyons, Mark Beecroft and Kiron Chatterjee Transportation Research Group, University of Southampton Editorial Board Jennifer Abley Cranfield University Mags Adams Lancaster University Simon Barnett Suffolk County Council Gary Burnett University of Nottingham Ali Clabburn Liftshare.com Richard Clegg University of York Matthew Frost Nottingham Trent University Simon Hubbard Peter Brett Associates Toby Rackliff Dumfries and Galloway Council Andrew Salkeld Leicester City Council The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund and the Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, as sponsors of the Transport Visions Network, are very gratefully acknowledged. The views of individuals conveyed in this report are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of their respective employers. TRANSPORT VISIONS Vehicles and Infrastructure 1 Published by Landor Publishing Ltd Quadrant House 250 Kennington Lane London SE11 5RD First published February 2002 © Landor Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. ISBN 1 899650 28 8 No responsibility for any loss as a consequence of any person relying upon the information or the views contained in this publication is accepted by the authors, contributors, or publishers. TRANSPORT VISIONS Vehicles and Infrastructure 2 Contents Preface ................................................................................5 Introduction........................................................................9 1. Today's Vehicles and Infrastructure ............................ 13 2. Tomorrow's Vehicles and Infrastructure..................... 23 3. A Vision: Control Culture............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Transportation Problem
    THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM GILBERT PAUL VERBITt TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 369 II. THREE VIEWS OF THE PROBLEM ................................ 372 A. The TransportationDisadvantaged ........................ 372 1. The Young .................................................... 373 2. The Elderly ................................................... 373 3. The Handicapped ........................................ 377 4." The Poor ....................................................... 378 5. Summary ....................................................... 388 B. Congestion ............................................................388 C. The Automobile Commuter .................................... 390 III. SYSTEM COSTS OF AUTOMOBILE COMMUTING ............ 392 A. The Automobile as an Energy Water ..................... 392 B. The Automobile as a Polluter ................................ 394 C. The Automobile as a Tortfeasor ............................. 397 D. The Automobile as a Space Waster ........................ 398 IV. THE URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1964 .. 401 A. The Act's Preferencefor Rail Rapid Transit .......... 401 B. The Basis for the Act's Preference for Rail Rapid Transit ................................................................. 412 1. Potential Benefits Examined ........................ 413 a. Cost ............................................................ 413 b. Speed .......................................................... 414 c. Labor
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Calming, Auto-Restricted Zones and Other Traffic Management Techniques-Their Effects on Bicycling and Pedestrians
    Publication No. FHWA-PD-93-028 Case Study No. 19 Traffic Calming, Auto-Restricted Zones and Other Traffic Management Techniques- Their Effects on Bicycling and Pedestrians National Bicycling And Walking Study U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration National Bicycling and Walking Study FHWA Case Study No. 19 Traffic Calming, Auto-Restricted Zones and Other Traffic Management Techniques---Their Effects on Bicycling and Pedestrians Submitted to: Federal Highway Administration 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 January 1994 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary v I. Introduction ................................................................................. 1 II. The History and Development of Traffic Calming ......................... 3 1. Pedestrianization..................................................................... 4 2. Woonerven............................................................................. 7 3. Verkehrsberuhigung ..............................................................12 4. Traffic Calming in Denmark...................................................19 5. Traffic Calming in Japan ........................................................19 6. Other Traffic-Reduction Strategies ........................................20 7. Summary ...............................................................................23 III. Traffic Calming in the United States ............................................25 Types of United States Traffic-Calming Techniques.....................25
    [Show full text]
  • Less Traffic Where People Live: How Local Transport Schemes Can Help Cut Traffic
    Less Traffic Where People Live: How local transport schemes can help cut traffic Built Environment Lynn Sloman Fellowship Less Traffic where People Live: How local transport schemes can help cut traffic Acknowledgements This research was generously supported by a Built Environment Fellowship from the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851. Further information about the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851 is available at http://www.royalcommission1851.org.uk Valuable research facilities were provided through a Visiting Fellowship at University of Westminster Transport Studies Group (http://www.wmin.ac.uk/transport/). Much advice and information was contributed by Transport 2000 Trust: http://www.transport2000.org.uk. With special thanks for intellectual and moral support to Alan Baxter, Sally Cairns, Stephen Coley, Peter Jones, Stephen Joseph, Colin Murray, Carey Newson, Malcolm Shirley, Ian Taylor, Sophie Tyler and Sarah Wixey. © Lynn Sloman, Transport for Quality of Life April 2003 Further copies of this report are available as a PDF file from: Transport for Quality of Life, 13 Maengwyn Street, Machynlleth SY20 8EB [email protected] ort for Quality of Life Transport for Quality of Life 3 Foreword Bumper-to-bumper traffic is one of the biggest problems we face in towns and cities. Opinion polls show that people are more and more concerned about the noise, pollution, danger and congestion caused by growing car use. Policy-makers say they aim to reduce congestion, but without trying to cut traffic. But it is simply not credible that congestion will fall, and continue to fall, while traffic volumes go up. Road widening and bigger junctions may ease traffic jams in the very short term, but in the long term they will contribute to yet more car-dependent lifestyles, more traffic and more congestion.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit System As a Project of Urbanity
    Milos STIPCIC QRU 7/ 121 TRANSIT SYSTEM AS A PROJECT OF URBANITY Milos STIPCIC Up to which point a transit system, a primarily utilitarian element of the Transit system - Synergy of the synergies city, could become a positive constituent of urban context, giving it a new significance and an additional value? In the last few decades, there is a rela- Up to which point a transit system, primarily utilitarian element of the city, tively new and increasing phenomenon in urbanism which is to put more could become an affirmative constituent of urban context, giving it a new effort into the integration of transit system and its surrounding. In different significance and an additional value? regions of the world, multidisciplinary teams of planners are working on many-sided urban projects along the transit routes in order to establish a Is it possible to exceed usual functional requirements and treat a transit sys- stronger dialog between mobility and the built environment, regardless the tem as a multidisciplinary project of urbanity? transport mode, size of city or urban context. The objective of this discussion How these general ideas could be adapted to different urban and economic is to give a general overview of this phenomenon and to evaluate some com- contexts? mon ideas or outcomes. Being part of a wider investigation, this short discussion has as the objective Keywords: Public space, Urban mobility, Urban quality to analyze a relatively new phenomena of treating a transport systems as a generator of urbanity, integrating them into the context or adapting the surroundings to their presence.
    [Show full text]
  • Streetscape Urban Design Group Urban
    and MAKING STREETS PEOPLE ENJOY Summer 2018 Urban Design Group Journal 147URBAN ISSN 1750 712X DESIGN STREETSCAPE Clapham Old Town Public Realm Brighton North Street Public Realm WINNER: NLA Awards 2015 ‘Best Public Space’; and HIGHLY COMMENDED at the Landscape Institute Awards 2017, WINNER: London Planning Awards 2015 ‘Best New Public Space’ ‘Adding Value through Landscape’. Venn Street Public Realm Glasgow City Centre Avenues WINNER: London Transport Awards 2015 ‘Excellence in Walking’; UM is the lead designer for this ambitious project, making the and HIGHLY COMMENDED at the RTPI Awards 2015. city centre’s main streets better for walking, cycling, + city life. We specialise in research, planning, strategy and design for streets, and our inter-disciplinary team has all the skills necessary to work creatively and effectively in the most complex and challenging of urban environments. Exmouth House 3 - 11 Pine Street We understand the real social, cultural and London EC1R 0JH economic value of streets and spaces, and always @UM_Streets URBAN strive to make cities and towns healthier, more +44 (0)20 3567 0710 [email protected] DESIGN successful, and more enjoyable. www.urbanmovement.co.uk GROUP URBAN DESIGN UDG_Streets_v2.indd 1 06/04/2018 16:37 GROUP NewsUDG NEWS By my current counting, Canary Wharf is going through its third rebuilding in some 30 years, and probably its 30th masterplan. I’m also pretty sure that someone is already thinking that the pointy bit at the top of the Shard is a waste of valuable real estate, and is drafting plans for something more ambitious. I digress.
    [Show full text]