Delivering the Vision 275

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Delivering the Vision 275 DELIVERING THE VISION 275 Chapter six – Delivering the vision Delivery in a changing world This strategy seeks to deliver the Mayor’s vision – to create a future London that is not only home to more people, but is a better place for all those people to live in. Fundamentally, this means reducing Londoners’ dependency on cars in favour of walking, cycling and public transport use. This chapter sets out how the vision will be delivered in the challenging context of a growing population, rapidly changing technology and falling Government grant to fund transport services in London. It will do this by: a) Ensuring changing technology contributes positively to the aims of the strategy. b) Working in collaboration with TfL, boroughs, Government, rail and others, and funding transport improvements through more efficient and fairer means. c) Monitoring and reporting to ensure delivery is on track. VERSION FOR PUBLICATION DELIVERING THE VISION 277 a) Changing technology Proposal 102 FIGURE 53: THE ROAD SPACE REQUIRED TO TRANSPORT 67 PEOPLE The Mayor, through TfL, will work Recent years have seen major to ensure its information systems technological developments, including and payment platforms take the rapid uptake of mobile technology. account of technological advances The increased ability to share and evolve to remain fit for purpose. information, new payment methods and the ease of accessing the internet on- the-go have already changed consumer Principles for new transport services expectations about interacting with the and technology transport system, and about how it is The evolution of technology has already operated. Technology will continue to generated new approaches to transport advance rapidly, and across the world services in London and this is only set billions of pounds will be invested in the to continue. How these develop has the development of ‘new mobility services’. potential to either help or hinder the achievement of the strategy’s aims. While some predicted technological The best examples of this issue relate Bus Bicycle Car (whether privately changes may be years or even decades to technologies that are developing owned or shared, diesel away, many are more immediate and can around how cars operate and how they Source: © Cycling Promotion Fund or electric) be used to improve people’s lives right can be accessed. now. This includes providing real-time information to people as they plan trips Car dependency and traffic dominance How efficiently road space is used for dominance – new car-based services and move around the city. It also means have many significant impacts on cities the movement of people provides a vivid and technologies may resolve some using available technologies to make and their residents. These range from example of this phenomenon. While problems, but others will remain. using active, efficient and sustainable health impacts – increasing inactivity and moving, a car takes up the same amount travel options easier, including by road danger, worsening air pollution and of physical space, regardless of who The only way to tackle all of the problems ensuring that payment platforms are noise, and creating severance between owns it, how safe it is or how clean its associated with car dependency and up to date and fit for purpose. By people and communities – to congestion. engine is. While there may be some ways traffic dominance is to reduce car use tracking and shaping new technological Many new technologies aim to resolve of improving how efficiently this space directly, through mode shift towards developments as they emerge, London some of these problems – electric is used in the future – such as increasing walking, cycling and public transport use. will continue to benefit from one of the vehicles will reduce some types of occupancy, or using technology to co- While technological changes to the way most comprehensive and integrated pollution and autonomous vehicles may ordinate vehicles – these will not make cars operate and how they are accessed transport networks in the world. reduce road danger – but no car-based cars as efficient as buses or cycles, have the potential to improve some approach to transport can solve them all. as illustrated in Figure 53. The same aspects of London life in some ways, type of issue can be seen across all the they are unlikely to be the best solution impacts of car dependency and traffic to London’s problems in the long term. VERSION FOR PUBLICATION DELIVERING THE VISION 279 In the worst cases, the adoption of It is not yet clear which precise measures new technologies could increase car will be needed to do this over the full dependency and traffic dominance, course of this strategy to 2041. The undermining efforts to increase walking, Mayor’s approach to developing these cycling and public transport levels. If measures will be based on a set of car-sharing services are promoted in the principles derived from the Healthy wrong areas, people could switch from Streets Approach, set out in Policy 23. cycling or getting the bus. If autonomous TfL will monitor changes to any transport vehicles make car use more appealing services or technology that could affect and easier to do, people may walk around how Londoners get around or experience their neighbourhoods less. This would London’s streets. This includes those present serious problems for the health detailed below and a range of other of Londoners and the functioning of potential developments, such as the the city. use of drones or delivery robots, as well as applications of technology that If well managed, however, new services cannot be predicted yet. The future could play an important role in catering development of policies and proposals for essential journeys in London, will be informed by this and guided by reducing car ownership and use, and Policy 23 to allow TfL to adapt as needed helping Londoners to transition away to ensure the aims of this strategy are from car dependency. achieved – potentially influencing how the organisation operates, engages with To put new services and technologies customers and businesses, and plans for to the best use for all Londoners, they the future. must, therefore, be carefully managed. VERSION FOR PUBLICATION DELIVERING THE VISION 281 appropriately managed, they could Policy 23 Policy 23 (continued) play a role in reducing car ownership The Mayor, through TfL, will explore, d) Cleaning London’s air and reducing f) Using space efficiently: new by providing connectivity where public influence and manage new transport carbon emissions: new services services must make efficient transport is harder to provide or for services in London so that they should achieve the very best use of road and kerb space, those who are not able to walk or cycle. support the Healthy Streets Approach, emissions standards to reduce be appropriate for the area of guided by the following principles: emissions of carbon dioxide, London in which they operate It will be important to provide walking nitrogen oxides and particulate and support opportunities to and cycling environments and public a) Supporting mode shift away from matter in London, and enable faster re-allocate space for walking, transport services that make active, car travel: new transport services switching to cleaner technologies. cycling and public transport. efficient and sustainable travel options should not encourage more car more appealing than ‘shared mobility’ journeys, especially where there e) Creating a safe, attractive g) Sharing data and knowledge: services. Managing the way people are good walking, cycling or public environment on our streets: new where possible, data and pay for road use could play a key role transport options. services and technology should knowledge should be shared in ensuring that these services do not help create a safer, quieter and with TfL and the GLA to cause major increases in congestion b) Complementing the public more pleasant environment on enable improved monitoring, or emissions. transport system: new services London’s streets, where it is operating and planning of the should help more people who would more attractive to walk or cycle, transport network. Limiting parking provision and charging otherwise complete their journey and should not lead to existing for its use is an effective means of by car to access the public active trips being made by non- managing private car usage, transport network, while not active modes. There must always Shared car and other but it could be less effective for reducing walking and cycling be an emphasis on the safety of low-occupancy services shared car services. How kerb space to and from stops and stations. passengers, people walking and New low-occupancy and car-based is used by shared vehicles will be an They should also provide a means cycling, and other road users. Where services, such as car sharing, ride important issue to consider if they of travel in areas where public this involves introducing technology pooling, and private hire vehicles that become more widespread. transport connectivity is currently directly into the street, it should can be easily booked via smartphone poor (especially in outer London). be done in a co-ordinated way that apps, are playing an increasingly large enhances the overall character role in how Londoners travel, and could Proposal 103 c) Opening travel to all: new of the street, reduces clutter, and continue to do so over the period The Mayor, through TfL, will explore services should be accessible does not prevent future potential covered by this strategy. If not managed and monitor the relationship to all Londoners and should not re-allocation of space for walking, well, the growth of these transport between access to kerb space, contribute to the creation of social, cycling and public transport. services could result in fewer people including for car parking, and the economic or digital divides in which travelling by public transport, foot and level of demand for all forms of car some Londoners would have better cycle, undermining the principles above.
Recommended publications
  • How to Enhance Walking and Cycling Instead of Shorter Car Trips and to Make These Modes Safer
    Deliverable D6 How to enhance WALking and CYcliNG instead of shorter car trips and to make these modes safer Public WALCYNG Contract No: UR-96-SC.099 Project Coordinator: Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, University of Lund, Sweden Partners: FACTUM Chaloupka, Praschl & Risser OHG Franco Gnavi and Carlo Bonanni City of Helsinki, City Planning Office Institute of Transport Economics Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki Instituto de Tráfico y Seguridad Vial (INTRAS), University of Valencia TransportTechnologie-Consult Karlsruhe GmbH Dutch Pedestrian Association "De Voetgangersvereniging" Chalmers University of Technology AB (Associated Contractor) Date: 15.1.1999 PROJECT FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION UNDER THE TRANSPORT RTD PROGRAMME OF THE 4th FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Deliverable D6 WALCYNG How to enhance WALking and CYcliNG instead of shorter car trips and to make these modes safer Public Hydén, C., Nilsson, A. & Risser, R. Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, University of Lund, Sweden & FACTUM Chaloupka, Praschl & Risser OHG, Vienna, Austria 6. Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Liisa Hakamies-Blomqvist, Finland 7. INTRAS, University of Valencia, Enrique J. Carbonell Vayá, Beatriz Martín, Spain 8. Transport Technologie-Consult Karlsruhe GmbH (former Verkehrs-Consult Karlsruhe), Rainer Schneider, Germany 9. De Voetgangersvereniging, Willem Vermeulen, The Netherlands 10. Road and Traffic Planning Department, Chalmers University of Technology AB, Olof Gunnarsson, Sweden TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport
    Public Transport Submission David Kilsby February 2009 Prepared for: Prepared by: Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport (RRAT) Standing Kilsby Australia Pty Ltd Cmomittee ACN 092 084 743 inquiry into Public Transport 20/809 Pacific Highway Department of the Senate Chatswood PO Box 6100 NSW 2067 Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 +61 2 9415 4544 www.kilsby.com.au Public Transport Contents Page 1.1.1. SUMMARYSUMMARY................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ................................... 111 2.2.2. CREDENTIALS ................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ................................................................................................ ....................... 222 3.3.3. PEAK OIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTTRANSPORT................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................... 444 4.4.4. TERMS OF REFERENCE ................................................................................... ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions from Rural and Metropolitan Councils
    Municipal Association of Victoria Subm ission to the Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Com m ittee Inquiry into future oil supply and alternative transport fuels February 2006 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................2 Local Government Context ..........................................................................................2 Options for Reducing Transport Fuel Demand ............................................................3 Encouragement of Alternative Transport Options ....................................................3 Land Use Planning and Transport Options ..............................................................4 Commonwealth Government Support of Public Transport.......................................5 Removal of Taxation Incentive to Consume Petroleum ...........................................6 Alternative Fuel Sources ..............................................................................................7 Government Policy to Promote Alternative Fuel Sources ........................................8 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................9 6 Introduction Local government in Victoria has a significant interest in transport through its direct provision of transport assets, such as roads, and its statutory and strategic land use planning responsibilities. In addition, local government is also
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Mobility TII Position Paper
    Sustainable Mobility TII Position Paper November 2020 Contents 1 | Introduction 3 2 | Definition of Sustainable Mobility 4 3 | Current Issues 6 3.1 Transport Inequity 6 3.2 Severance and Poor Permeability 6 4 | Vision for Sustainable Mobility 7 4.1 Planning 7 4.2 Multi-Modal Travel 9 4.3 Demand Management 14 4.4 Expanding Data Collection 14 4.5 Collaboration 15 5 | Summary 16 2 1 | Introduction TII’s purpose is to provide sustainable transport infrastructure transport in Ireland. and services, delivering a better quality of life, supporting economic growth and respecting the environment. In fulfilling The purpose of this paper is to outline TII’s position on this purpose, TII strive to be leaders in the delivery and Sustainable Mobility, in terms of: operation of sustainable transport infrastructure and to ensure – The importance of sustainable mobility; that Ireland’s national road and light rail infrastructure is safe and resilient, delivering sustainability mobility for people and – The current issues that need to be overcome to provide for goods. Sustainability is one TII’s core values that permeate sustainable mobility; and our way of working, playing our part in addressing the climate – The vision for what sustainable mobility can be and can and biodiversity crisis. This purpose, vision and value is deliver, and key themes through which it can be achieved. set out in the TII Statement of Strategy 2021 to 2025 which makes an overt commitment to supporting the transition to Sustainable mobility is a complicated, multi-faceted issue a low-carbon and climate resilient future, through enabling and this paper is not intended to address every single active travel and prioritising sustainability in decision making, element of the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Congestion Reduction in Europe: Advancing Transport Efficiency
    Congestion Reduction in Europe: Advancing Transport Efficiency MG-5.3-2014 Tackling urban road congestion D5.1 A long term analysis of traffic congestion and car use reduction in major European cities: what policies and measures worked? WP5 - Combating congestion and reducing levels of car use in European cities: strategies, business models and guidelines Due date of deliverable: Month 30 – November 2017 Actual submission date: Month 36 – May 2018 Start date of project: June 1st 2015 Duration: 36 months Author: Paul Curtis Lead beneficiary for this deliverable: Vectos Dissemination Level: PU Table of contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Objective ................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Combining measures....................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Types of measures ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 External factors ................................................................................................................................. 8 2. Measure mixing in the
    [Show full text]
  • (Draft Transport Strategy) Statement of Consultation
    Stevenage Borough Council Future Town Future Transport 2018 (Draft Transport Strategy) Statement of Consultation (2019) I Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 What is a Statement of Consultation? ................................................................................... 3 What is Future Town, Future Transport? .............................................................................. 3 2.0 The Consultation ............................................................................................................. 4 Draft Transport Strategy ........................................................................................................ 4 Liveable Streets Survey .......................................................................................................... 4 Responses .............................................................................................................................. 5 3.0 Consultation Responses .................................................................................................. 6 Key Themes of Responses to the draft Transport Strategy ................................................... 6 Outcomes of Meetings with Employers .............................................................................. 13 Survey Results and Liveable Street Trial Nominations ........................................................ 14 4.0 How we incorporated the responses
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Strategy 2030 Contents
    TRANSPORT STRATEGY 2030 CONTENTS Foreword 3 Implementation 106 Executive Summary 4 Policy summary 108 Vision 2030 8 Implementation plan 110 Context 20 Walking and Station Precincts map 112 Context map 22 Public Transport map 114 Policy alignment 25 Bikes map 116 Challenges and opportunities 26 Motor Vehicles map 118 Strategy development 28 2030 Proposed Integrated Network map 120 Theme 1: A Safe and Liveable City 30 Appendices 122 Challenges and opportunities 32 References 122 Outcomes 1-4 34 Glossary 123 Theme 2: An Efficient and Productive City 60 Evidence-based public transport planning 126 Challenges and opportunities 62 Outcomes 5-9 64 Theme 3: A Dynamic and Adaptable City 88 Challenges and opportunities 90 A CONNECTED CITY Outcomes 10-13 92 In a connected city, all people and goods can move to, from and within the city efficiently. Catering for growth and safeguarding prosperity will require planning for an efficient and sustainable transport network. Acknowledgement of Traditional Owners Disclaimer The City of Melbourne respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners This report is provided for information and it does not purport to be complete. While care has been taken to ensure the content in the report is accurate, we cannot guarantee it is without flaw of any kind. There may be errors and omissions or it may not be wholly appropriate for your particular purposes. In addition, the publication of the land, the Boon Wurrung and Woiwurrung (Wurundjeri) people is a snapshot in time based on historic information which is liable to change. The City of Melbourne accepts no responsibility and disclaims all liability for any error, loss or of the Kulin Nation and pays respect to their Elders, past and present.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecomaths – Reducing Car Use
    | NSW Department of Education Ecomaths – Reducing Car Use ABC ME screening details: Monday 18 May, 2020 at 11:45am This episode can also be viewed on ABC iView after the scheduled screening time. Key learning areas: mathematics, science Level: secondary About: In this episode, Stefan explores alternatives to car use by pedalling a rickshaw across Bristol and performing simple calculations to determine the carbon cost of a new cycle way. Before the episode 1. How many cars do you own? 2. How many days a week do you use your cars? 3. Estimate how many kilometres a week your cars would drive. During the episode 1. Why do we prefer cars as a means of travel? 2. How many kilograms of CO2 is saved by a person riding as opposed to driving 1 km? 3. How many kilograms of CO2 were produced by building 1 km of cycling track? education.nsw.gov.au After the episode 1. Think of friends and people you know. Record in the frequency table below how each person gets to school. 2. Calculate the fraction and percentage of people that travel by each mode of transport. 3. Cars and light vehicles account for 10% of Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions. If Australia produces 43 000 000 tonnes of CO2 each year, how much is produced by cars and light vehicles? 4. The average emissions for cars in Australia is 45% higher than it is in Europe. Based on your answer to question 3, how much CO2 is produced by cars in Europe? 5. The average car produces 184 g CO2 per kilometre.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Transportation CASE STUDIES
    Sustainable Transportation CASE STUDIES An Introduction to the Case Studies These case studies are intended to provide easy access to the exciting and revolutionary changes that are happening in transportation all over the world. Communities, cities, schools, and businesses are rethinking and redesigning the way they transport people and goods. These approaches are helping to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, and traffic congestion. They are also strengthening communities through more social interaction and improving individual health through more active living. Think of these case studies as starting points to conversation, exploration, and student action. They demonstrate positive examples of the human spirit and imagination. They model the kinds of efforts that can inspire your students to take on a challenge of their own and to make a change—for themselves, their school, or the wider community. EnerAction offers ten sustainable transportation case studies that profile a wide range of topics including transportation demand management, cycling infrastructure and planning, youth leadership, technological innovation, community projects, and more. The ten case studies are: #1: Go Fly a Kite! #2: Fort Street Revival #3: Getting Charged About Electric #4: Doing Better Together #5: Building Bikes and Bearing Food #6: The Trampe #7: The Bogotá Project #8: Cool Riding #9: Grandma Rides Again #10: Streets for Living Copyright © 2010 GreenLearning Canada Engaging Students in Case Studies You can use these case studies as recommended in an EnerAction sustainable transportation lesson plan. To use them independently, consider asking groups of students to create a short summary of a case study and a drawing that captures the spirit of the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
    UNDERSTANDING TRAVEL BEHAVIOR Research Scan Authors Elliot Martin, Susan Shaheen, and Ismail Zohdy Research Team Nelson Chan, Apaar Bansal, Abhinav Bhattacharyya, Aly Tawfik, Balaji Yelchuru, Rachel Finson, and Christina Yeung Yam Wah Prepared By Booz Allen Hamilton University of California, Berkley – Transportation Sustainability Research Center NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The U.S. Government is not endorsing any manufacturers, products, or services cited herein and any trade name that may appear in the work has been included only because it is essential to the contents of the work. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 1.0. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 13 CHAPTER 2.0. PRESENT DAY TRAVEL BEHAVIOR MEASUREMENT AND RESEARCH WITHIN THE UNITED STATES ............................................................................................................ 15 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 Trends and Measurement of Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Systems More Sustainable
    CSD19/2011/BP2 UNITED NATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS Commission on Sustainable Development Nineteenth Session New York, 2-13 May 2011 TECHNOLOGY AND POLICY OPTIONS FOR MAKING TRANSPORT SYSTEMS MORE SUSTAINABLE Prepared by Karlson 'Charlie' Hargroves Adjunct Associate Professor Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute Principal Researcher, The Natural Edge Project and Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker Co-Chair of the International Resource Panel United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) Background Paper No.2 CSD19/2011/BP2 CSD19/2011/BP2 CONTENTS I. Introduction 1 A. Key transport issues and trends 1 B. Transportation related issues in developing countries 3 II. City scale: encouriaging cities to reduce car use and congestion 7 A. Encouraging alternatives to the use of cars 7 B. Investing in public transport and other modes 10 III. National scale: encouraging a shift to low carbon intensive modes 13 A. Encouraging alternatives to the use of trucks for long-haul freight 15 B. Encouraging alternatives to air travel 14 IV. National/International scale: reducing the energy/carbon intensity of vehicles 15 A. Decarbonising cars and light vehicles 15 B. Decarbonising heavy freight trucks 17 C. Decarbonising aircraft, rail and shipping 18 V. Conclusions and recomme ndations 23 CSD19/2011/BP2 Transport Technology and Policy Options for Making Transport Systems More Sustainable Karlson 'Charlie' Hargroves, Adjunct Associate Professor, Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute Principal Researcher, The Natural Edge Project and Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker Co-Chair of the International Resource Panel United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) I. INTRODUCTION A. Key transport issues and trends 1. Transport planning is undertaken at the city, national and international level with each having particular responsibilities and options to enable change.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Car Dependency Scorecard
    2010 CAR DEPENDENCY SCORECARD The top cities for sustainable transport September 2010 www.bettertransport.org.uk CarCar Dependency Dependency Scorecard Scorecard 2010 2010 Contents Fixing the car problem 2 Cars are often still associated with freedom and car users 2 Introduction are seen to be exercising their freedom to choose how INTRODUCTION they get about. Our report suggests that for many people 2 car use is enforced rather than a choice and people are 4 Ranking only dependent on cars due to the lack of other options. Car dependency adds to congestion and pollution and creates social exclusion for those without access to a car. 25 Best 3 cities Car dependency isn’t inevitable. We found that English cities vary widely. This variation is, of course, partly about whether there are good alternatives to the car – whether 26 WorstINTRODUCTION 3 cities public transport is available, affordable and attractive and whether cycling and walking feel safe. It is also about town planning; the design and location of housing, employment and essential “Through their transport 2 services. Through their transport and planning policies, and planning policies, 7 SectionCarINTRODUCTION dependency conclusions cities can reduce car dependency and give people real cities can reduce car choices about how they travel. However, their ability dependency and give 213 Local Transport Plans to do this could be affected by Government policies. people real choices.” INTRODUCTION The priorities in the forthcoming Spending Review will determine whether the funding that cities get helps them to develop sustainable 2 Top 3 Cities transport or promotes further car use. Similarly, if the Government’s planning policies 15 Appendices encourage low-density car-based development, car dependency will increase.
    [Show full text]