NPR72: the Pavlodar Chemical Weapons Plant in Kazakhstan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NPR72: the Pavlodar Chemical Weapons Plant in Kazakhstan GULBARSHYN BOZHEYEVA Report The Pavlodar Chemical Weapons Plant in Kazakhstan: History and Legacy GULBARSHYN BOZHEYEVA Gulbarshyn Bozheyeva holds a Ph.D. degree in Chemical Physics from the Kazakh State University. From 1996-97, she was a Visiting Scholar and Research Associate at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies. She is now completing a master’s degree in International Development Policy at Duke University. he former Soviet Union’s chemical weapons theless, manufacturing lines and equipment for primary (CW) program consisted of many production and intermediate CW precursors and buildings for fill- plants that created the world’s largest stockpile ing CW munitions were constructed at Pavlodar. The T 1 of chemical weapons. Most of the CW production and plant also acquired personnel with expertise in CW pro- storage facilities were located in Russia, but a few fa- duction.5 cilities existed in other Soviet republics. In recent years, This report is devoted to the role of the Pavlodar Western countries have provided significant financial Chemical Plant in the former Soviet CW program and assistance for dismantling former CW facilities in Rus- its current status. The first part of the report describes sia and converting former CW production facilities for the history of the Pavlodar plant and its military and 2 commercial use. Although a fair amount has been writ- civilian infrastructures. The second part deals with the ten about Russian CW facilities, little is known about CW capability of the plant and the nature of the chemi- the CW programs in other former Soviet republics. cal agents that were produced there. The third part fo- One such facility designed for the production of CW cuses on conversion problems facing the Pavlodar plant was built in the city of Pavlodar in northern Kazakh- in the new market environment following the breakup stan.3 The Pavlodar Chemical Plant was a dual-purpose of the Soviet Union. complex in which civilian chemical production served as a cover for military activities. This plant appears to A DUAL-PURPOSE CHEMICAL COMPLEX have been the most recently constructed of the Soviet Construction of the Pavlodar Chemical Plant began CW production centers and may have been designed for in 1965 on the banks of the Irtysh River in northern Ka- the production of new-generation binary nerve agents, zakhstan.6 As was typical of Soviet CW production fa- which were developed by the Soviet Union in the 1980s.4 cilities, the plant was designed to be a dual-purpose Although the Pavlodar plant manufactured precursor production complex, capable of manufacturing both ci- chemicals for CW agents, it never actually produced vilian chemicals and military CW agents. The civilian chemical weapons. The plant was not yet complete when part of the plant served as a cover for the military-re- Moscow halted construction in 1987 because of the So- lated production and supplied the latter part with energy viet Union’s increasing involvement in the negotiation and basic chemicals.7 The first nitrogen and oxygen pro- of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). Never- duction plant at the Pavlodar plant, called the “heart of 136 The Nonproliferation Review/Summer 2000 GULBARSHYN BOZHEYEVA the plant” due to the importance of nitrogen screening Gorbachev, the Pavlodar plant stopped building new CW in dealing with flammable chemicals, began operating production lines and began the dismantlement and con- in 1973. The construction of new buildings and the in- version of the existing infrastructure for the production troduction of new production lines, particularly the of civilian chemicals.13 Were it not for Gorbachev’s or- military ones, continued until 1992. In 1991, the Pavlodar der, construction of the CW plant would have been com- plant was a huge complex occupying a territory of 2,500 pleted three years later.14 hectares and employing some 6,500 people, including The production process at Site Number Two started 500 engineers. In addition to chemical production, the with a plant for manufacturing phosphorus trichloride plant had a farm and an extensive social infrastructure (PC1 ), the basic starting material for the synthesis of 8 3 that served its employees. nerve agents (see Table 1 listing Site Number Two fa- The Pavlodar plant was under the authority of the cilities).15 Yellow phosphorus extracted from deposits Soyuzorgsintez Directorate of the Soviet Ministry of in southern Kazakhstan, together with chlorine produced Chemical Industry, which supervised the production of at Site Number One, were used as initial components all military-related chemicals in the Soviet Union. The for the synthesis of phosphorus trichloride. The chlo- plant consisted of Site Number One, designated for ci- rine was obtained using mercury electrolysis from so- vilian production, and Site Number Two, designated for dium chloride taken from a deposit near Pavlodar. the production and weaponization of CW agents. Site A plant designated for manufacturing intermediate Number Two had a strict security system and was headed CW chemicals was situated next to the PC13 production by a chief engineer who reported directly to the central building. This building was equipped with corrosion- Moscow authorities. The authorities at Pavlodar usually resistant chemical reactors lined with silver or made of did not have military ranks, although military represen- high-nickel steel (Hastalloy). Such equipment is needed tatives would arrive during the launch of CW produc- for the synthesis of nerve agent components, which re- tion lines. quire the use of highly corrosive chemicals such as hy- Sapyrbek Sultanovich Berketov served as the direc- drochloric acid and hydrogen fluoride.16 The nickel alloy, tor of the entire Pavlodar plant were from 1977 to 1986, designated XH65MB, used in the Site Number Two re- and Boris Aleksandrovich Sharov did so from 1986 to actors contained 65 percent nickel, 18 percent molybde- 1997.9 However, in accordance with the separate man- num, 11 percent wolfram, and chromium. Due to the agement security system, these officials may not have high cost of Hastalloy equipment, it is usually not widely had clearance to know in detail about the CW activities available at civilian plants.17 at Site Number Two. The first secretary of the regional The next buildings in line were the main plant for committee of the Communist Party, the highest author- manufacturing the final CW agents and laboratory build- ity in the region, had no control over the Pavlodar plant. ings for testing them on laboratory animals. Construc- However, specialists from Site Number Two had clear- tion of these facilities was never competed. The last ances to visit other CW production facilities in building in line, which was destroyed in 1987, was de- Novocheboksarsk and Volgograd and learn from these signed for operations with supertoxic CW agent prod- 10 plants’ expertise. ucts.18 Located across from and parallel to the main production building was a building for filling chemical MILITARY PRODUCTION AT PAVLODAR munitions; it had four-meter thick walls reinforced with Site Number Two consisted of about five plants des- 16 internal columns to contain accidents with high ex- ignated for the production of CW agents, including ba- plosives.19 The plan was to build special tunnels con- sic chemicals manufacturing, laboratory testing, and necting this building with the final CW agent production filling of agents into military munitions. The site occu- building nearby. pied a territory of 550 hectares, with most of the pro- Other buildings at the site included warehouses for duction buildings located in two parallel rows (see storage of chlorine, support facilities, and an incinerator 11 Figures 1-4). The site was designed to manufacture for the elimination of chemical wastes.20 Several rail- nerve agents, but construction of military lines had not road lines and vehicle roads crossed the site, including been completed when Soviet authorities halted the CW one railroad line departing directly from the munitions program in 1987.12 At the order of Soviet leader Mikhail The Nonproliferation Review/Summer 2000 137 GULBARSHYN BOZHEYEVA Table 1: Production Facilities at Site Number Two Buildings and their CW Buildings’ status after the Status as of June 1999 production purposes 1987 conversion until 1992 Phosphorus trichloride Civilian-use PCl3 Civilian-use PCl3 (PC13) production building production production Intermediate CW precursor Production of civilian-use Production of civilian production building Folitol, Gidrel, and IOMS mineral-salt Acrylates in silver-lined inhibitors in Hastalloy reactors reactors Final CW agent production Not completed Not in use building Laboratory buildings Not completed Sold to a Kazakhstani leather processing company Munitions filling building No military equipment Sold to Kazenergokabel, a installed; used for civilian wire production company chemical production, including PVC pipes Building for operations with Completely destroyed in final CW products 1987 Support infrastructure Motor oil production Sold to Lyubol, a building Kazakhstani-Swiss joint venture Incinerator for the In use In use elimination of chemical wastes filling building. Facilities for supplying heat, electric- nologies were to have been introduced. It began opera- ity, and water, and other support infrastructure serving tions about 15 years after the nerve agent production Site Number Two, were located at Site Number One.21 plant in Novocheboksarsk, Russia.23 Pavlodar was in- tended to substitute for some production lines at In 1987, at Gorbachev’s orders, the building for op- Novocheboksarsk and at the older nerve agent produc- erations with final CW products was razed to the ground. tion plant in Volgograd, which had been constructed af- Also, one smoke stack connected to the underground ter World War II. For example, production of ventilation system next to this building was destroyed. phosphorous trichloride was to be transferred from Other facilities and equipment at Site Number Two were Volgograd to Pavlodar.24 converted for the production of civilian chemicals.
Recommended publications
  • Novichok Agent - Wikipedia
    18-3-2018 Novichok agent - Wikipedia Novichok agent Novichok (Russian: Новичо́к, "newcomer") is a series of nerve agents the Soviet Union and Russia developed between 1971 and 1993.[a][2][3] Russian scientists who developed the agents claim they are the deadliest nerve agents ever made, with some variants possibly five to eight times more potent than VX,[4][5] and others up to ten times more potent than soman.[6] They were designed as part of a Soviet program codenamed "FOLIANT".[7][1] Five Novichok variants are believed to have been weaponised for military use.[8] The most versatile was A-232 (Novichok-5).[9] Novichok agents have never been used on the battlefield. Theresa May, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, said that one such agent was used in the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in England in March 2018.[10] Russia officially denies producing or researching Novichok agents.[11] In 2013, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons Scientific Advisory Board reported that it had insufficient information to comment on the existence or properties of Novichok agents,[12] and in 2011 it noted there was no peer reviewed paper on Novichok agents in scientific literature.[13] Contents Design objectives Disclosure Development and test sites Description of Novichok agents Chemistry Effects Use Poisoning of Kivelidi Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal See also References Further reading External links Design objectives These agents were designed to achieve four objectives:[14][15] To be undetectable using standard 1970s and 1980s NATO chemical detection equipment; To defeat NATO chemical protective gear; To be safer to handle; To circumvent the Chemical Weapons Convention list of controlled precursors, classes of chemical and physical form.
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphorus Oxychloride CAS No
    Product Safety Summary Phosphorus Oxychloride CAS No. 10025-87-3 This Product Safety Summary is intended to provide a general overview of the chemical substance. The information in the summary is basic information and is not intended to provide emergency response information, medical information or treatment information. The summary should not be used to provide in-depth safety and health information. In-depth safety and health information can be found in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for the chemical substance. Names Phosphorus oxychloride Phosphorus trichloride oxide Phosphoric trichloride POCl 3 Product Overview Solvay Novecare does not sell phosphorus oxychloride directly to consumers. Phosphorus oxychloride (POCl3) is used as a chemical intermediate to produce a variety of products which are used in several applications including manufacture of triarylphosphate esters which are used as flame retardants as well as an intermediate in the production of pharmaceutical, textile and agricultural chemicals. Phosphorus oxychloride is used in industrial applications and other processes where workplace exposures can occur. Consumer exposure does not occur as phosphorus oxychloride is not used in any commercially available product. Phosphorus oxychloride is dangerous to human health. Phosphorus oxychloride may be fatal if inhaled, highly toxic if swallowed, harmful if absorbed through skin and can cause severe burns which may result in scarring. Phosphorus oxychloride is consumed in manufacturing processes. POCl3 can make its way into the environment through unintentional releases (spills). POCl3 will not bioaccumulate but is not biodegradable. POCl3 in higher concentrations can be harmful to aquatic life due to formation of acids from the hydrolysis of POCl3. When released into the atmosphere, phosphorus oxychloride exists as vapor.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Phosphorus Oxychloride1 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels
    Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 10 Committee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels Committee on Toxicology Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology Division on Earth and Life Studies Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 10 THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 FIFTH STREET, NW WASHINGTON, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Insti- tute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This project was supported by Contract No. W81K04-06-D-0023 and EP-W-09-007 be- tween the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recom- mendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for this project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-21987-7 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-21987-6 Additional copies of this report are available from The National Academies Press 500 Fifth Street, NW Box 285 Washington, DC 20055 800-624-6242 202-334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area) http://www.nap.edu Copyright 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • KZ Report2018.Pdf
    National Preventive Mechanism for the Prevention of Torture / CONSOLIDATED REPORT • 2016 / 1 CONSOLIDATED REPORT CONSOLIDATED REPORT Prepared by the National Preventive Mechanism Membersconsolidated on report the Preventive Prepared by the National Preventive MechanismVisits members Made on thein 2016Preventive Visits Made in 2017 National Preventive Mechanism for the Prevention of Torture Astana |2018 2017 Consolidated Report of the National Preventive Mechanism members on the preventive visits carried out in 2017, Astana, 2017 - 178 p. The Report has been drafted by the Coordination Council of NPM under the Comissioner for Human Rights and published with the support of the OSCE Programme Office in Astana and the Penal Reform International Representative Office in Central Asia The content of the document is the sole liability of the authors. CONTENTS 1. On some organizational issues of the National Preventive Mechanism in 2017 ............................. 7 2. Rights of convicts in correctional institutions of the Committee of the Criminal Execution System (CCES) under the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MoI RK) .............................15 3. The situation of persons detained in remand centres of the Committee of the Criminal Execution System (CCES) under the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MoI RK) .........................................31 4. The situation of persons held in temporary detention facilities and other institutions of the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MoI RK) .........67 5. The situation of persons held in institutions subordinated to the National Security Committee (NSC) of the Republic of Kazakhstan .............83 6. The situation of persons held in institutions under the Ministry of Defence .............................................89 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan Is Located in Central Asia
    featureem Paul Randall leads engineering research in the development of mercury risk mitigation and containment strategies and water decontamination research for EPA’s National Risk Management Research Laboratory in Cincinnati, OH. He also provides technical support to Kazakhstan scientists through the U.S. State Department. Mikhail Ilyushchenko, Evgeny Lapshin, and Larissa Kuzmenko are with Almaty Institute of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected]. Another example and the subject of this article is the mercury pollution at a chemical facility near the city of Pavlodar. Pavlodar is located in the northeastern part of the republic of Kazakhstan (near Semey) and situated on the Irtysh River. It has a population of more than 330,000 people. The Pavlodar Chemical Plant is contaminated with mercury as a result of industrial activity that produced chlo- rine and alkali during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. Studies have identified significant amounts of mercury pollution in the soil, water, and sediments. Organic mercury com- pounds, particularly methylmercury, are present in the sedi- ments. Methylmercury rather than inorganic mercury is bioconcentrated because organisms at various levels of the food chain better retain it. In particular, high levels of this compound were found in fish from Lake Balkyldak, which is located adjacent to the Pavlodar Chemical Plant. The mercury enters Lake Balkyldak as a result of soluble The Pavlodar Plant is Kazakhstan is located in Central Asia, contaminated with mercury bordered on the north by Russia; on the east by China; on as a result of industrial the south by Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan; and activity during the 1970s, on the west by the Caspian Sea and Russia (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent Office Patented Oct
    3,346,562 United States Patent Office Patented Oct. 10, 1967 2 3,346,562 cg METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF PO-CE Base RBONUCLEOSDE-5'-PHOSPHATE / O Mikio Honjo, Takatsuki, and Ryuji Maremoto, Minoo, Cl EO Japan, assignors to Takeda Chemical industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan No Drawing. Filed May 31, 1966, Ser. No. 553,718 Claims priority, application Japan, May 29, 1965, R. X R. 40/31,814 9 Claims. (Cl. 260-21.5) HO. O. BIO O 10 N1 N1 This invention is concerned with a method for the pro Po-H, Base Po-H, Base duction of ribonucleoside-5'-phosphate. EIO k" wE+ EO k". Ribonucleoside-5'-phosphate is very useful as condi H HO - ment for food and also in the pharmaceutical industry, O O OH OH and has been chemically produced by at first protecting 15 X the hydroxyl groups at the 2'- and 3'-positions of its ribose R1 R2 moiety with acyl or isopropylidene groups and then phos phorylating the 5'-hydroxyl group of the thus-protected RN compound with pentavalent phosphorus compound such C=O: aliphatic ketone or aromatic aldehyde as phosphorus pentachloride, phosphorus oxychloride, 20 R?2 etc., followed by removing the protecting groups. As "ribonucleoside' in the present method there are However, this hitherto-known method requires a long used those containing purine base such as adenosine, time (about 7 to about 30 hours) for completing the pro inosine, etc. or those containing pyrimidine base such as tection and phosphorylation, and therefore is not desirable uridine, cytidine, etc. As the aliphatic ketone having 3 from an industrial viewpoint.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Oralmans in Kazakhstan
    Каzakhstan STATUS OF ORALMANS IN KAZAKHSTAN OVERVIEW Almaty, 2006 AbbREVIATIONS AMD Agency for Migration and Demography CST Center for Social Technology GDP Gross domestic product IHE Institute of Higher Education IOM International Organization for Migration ILO International Labour Organization KRCS Kazakhstan Red Crescent Society KZT Kazakhstan tenge MCR monthly calculation rate NGO Non-governmental organization UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme RoK Republic of Kazakhstan USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CST Center for Social Technologies SSEE Specialized secondary educational establishment USA United States of America Contents FOREWORd by THE INTERNATIONAL ORgANIZATION FOR MIgRATION .................................................................................................................4 FOREWORd by THE UNITEd NATIONS dEVELOPMENT PROgRAMME .......................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARy .........................................................................................................6 INTROdUCTION ..................................................................................................................7 CHAPTER I. THE dEVELOPMENT OF ETHNIC IMMIgRATION POLICIES ..........................................7 CHAPTER II. gENERAL CHARACTERISTICS ..........................................................................................13 CHAPTER III. ECONOMIC ANd SOCIAL INTEgRATION OF ORALMANS ...........................................15 CHAPTER IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Particularly Hazardous Substances
    Particularly Hazardous Substances In its Laboratory Standard, OSHA requires the establishment of additional protections for persons working with "Particularly Hazardous Substances" (PHS). OSHA defines these materials as "select" carcinogens, reproductive toxins and acutely toxic materials. Should you wish to add: explosive, violently reactive, pyrophoric and water-reactve materials to this category, the information is included. Carbon nanotubes have also been added due to their suspected carcinogenic properties. This table is designed to assist the laboratory in the identification of PHS, although it is not definitively conclusive or entirely comprehensive. *Notes on the proper use of this table appear on page 12. 1 6 5 2 3 4 Substance CAS National Toxicity National Program Carcinogen Toxin Acute Regulated OSHA Carcinogen Group IARC Carcinogen Toxin Reproductive Violently Reactive/ Explosive/Peroxide Forming/Pyrophoric A-a-C(2-Amino-9H-pyrido[2,3,b]indole) 2648-68-5 2B Acetal 105-57-7 yes Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 NTP AT 2B Acrolein (2-Propenal) 107-02-8 AT Acetamide 126850-14-4 2B 2-Acetylaminofluorene 53-96-3 NTP ORC Acrylamide 79-06-6 NTP 2B Acrylyl Chloride 814-68-6 AT Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 NTP ORC 2B Adriamycin 23214-92-8 NTP 2A Aflatoxins 1402-68-2 NTP 1 Allylamine 107-11-9 AT Alkylaluminums varies AT Allyl Chloride 107-05-1 AT ortho-Aminoazotoluene 97-56-3 NTP 2B para-aminoazobenzene 60-09-3 2B 4-Aminobiphenyl 92-67-1 NTP ORC 1 1-Amino-2-Methylanthraquinone 82-28-0 NTP (2-Amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole) 67730-11-4 2B
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Competitiveness of Regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan Zhanna Tsaurkubule, Zhaxat Kenzhin, Dana Bekniyazova, Gulmira Bayandina, Gulsara Dyussembekova
    Assessment of competitiveness of regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan Zhanna Tsaurkubule, Zhaxat Kenzhin, Dana Bekniyazova, Gulmira Bayandina, Gulsara Dyussembekova To cite this version: Zhanna Tsaurkubule, Zhaxat Kenzhin, Dana Bekniyazova, Gulmira Bayandina, Gulsara Dyussem- bekova. Assessment of competitiveness of regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Insights into Regional Development, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, 2020, 2 (1), pp.469-479. 10.9770/IRD.2020.2.1(6). hal-02569361 HAL Id: hal-02569361 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02569361 Submitted on 11 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. INSIGHTS INTO REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ISSN 2669-0195 (online) http://jssidoi.org/IRD/ 2020 Volume 2 Number 1 (March) http://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2020.2.1(6) Publisher http://jssidoi.org/esc/home ASSESSMENT OF COMPETITIVENESS OF REGIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN* Zhanna Tsaurkubule 1, Zhaxat Kenzhin 2, Dana Bekniyazova 3, Gulmira Bayandina 4, Gulsara Dyussembekova 5 1,2Baltic International Academy, Lomonosov Street 4, Riga, Latvia 3Innovative University of Eurasia, Lomovstreet, 45, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan 4, 5S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomov Street, 64, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan E-mails: 1 [email protected] , 2 [email protected] , 3 [email protected] , 4 [email protected] , 5 [email protected] Received 15 September 2019; accepted 8 December 2019; published 30 March 2020 Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Intergovernmental Water Relations in Ile-Balkhash Basin
    Promoting IWRM and Fostering Transboundary Dialogue Project is financed In Central Asia by the European Union Intergovernmental water relations in Ile-Balkhash Basin Review of water relations and main problems in transboundary management of water resources in Ile-Balkhash basin In compliance with the signed agreement between the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan and Chinese People Republic on partnership in the sphere of use and protection of Transboundary rivers the Kazakh-Chinese joint commission on use and protection of Transboundary Rivers was created. In compliance with regulation of Commission the objectives include realization of indicated agreement, and the coordination of the work, connected with use and protection of Transboundary Rivers; endorsement and determination of the seat of posts of monitoring and measuring of content and quality of water. One more objective of the commission is researching of the integrated methods of monitoring of measuring, analyze and evaluation, conducting of the joint researches on prevention and mitigation of the influences of flood, freezing and other natural disaster. Commission competencies include researching of tendencies of the future changes of water and quality of water of transboundary river; conducting of joint researches and experience sharing in the sphere of use and protection of Transboundary rivers. Three years of not simple negotiations and hard work were necessary for agreement signing, during that 5 rounds of negotiations of the Kazakh-Chinese joint commission on tarnsboundary rivers took place and two meetings of the working groups of experts, which cause definite harmonization of the position of parts on problems. Lower the full review of the meetings of Kazakh-Chinese joint commission on use and protection of Transboundary Rivers will be provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Safety Summary
    Product Safety Summary Phosphorus Trichloride CAS No. 7719-12-2 This Product Safety Summary is intended to provide a general overview of the chemical substance. The information in the summary is basic information and is not intended to provide emergency response information, medical information or treatment information. The summary should not be used to provide in-depth safety and health information. In-depth safety and health information can be found in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for the chemical substance. Names Phosphorus trichloride Phosphorus (III) chloride Phosphorous chloride PCl 3 Product Overview Solvay Novecare does not sell phosphorus trichloride directly to consumers and phosphorus trichloride has no known uses except as an intermediate to produce other chemicals. Phosphorus trichloride (PCl3) is used as a chemical intermediate to produce a variety of products which are used in several applications including agricultural products, surfactants and metal extractants, flame retardants, additives for lubricants and stabilizers for plastics. Phosphorus trichloride is used in industrial applications and other processes where workplace exposures can occur. Consumer exposure does not occur as phosphorus trichloride is not used in any commercially available product. Phosphorus trichloride is dangerous to human health. Phosphorus trichloride may be fatal if inhaled, highly toxic if swallowed, harmful if absorbed through skin and can cause severe burns which may result in scarring. Phosphorus trichloride is consumed in manufacturing processes. PCl3 can make its way into the environment through unintentional releases (spills). PCl3 will not bioaccumulate but is not biodegradable. Based on ecotoxicological testing performed on fish and fresh-water invertebrates, PCl3 in higher concentrations can be harmful to aquatic life due to formation of acids from the hydrolysis of PCl3.
    [Show full text]
  • Converting Former Soviet Chemical Weapons Plants
    Jonathan B. Tucker ince Russia possesses the world’s largest stockpile This essay lays out a brief history of the CWPF con- of chemical weapons (CW)—a declared total of version issue and the contending U.S. and Russian posi- S40,000 metric tons—Russian ratification and tions. It then suggests a compromise approach based on implementation of the 1993 Chemical Weapons Conven- industrial joint ventures that would enable Moscow to tion (CWC) will be critical to the success of the global convert its former CWPFs in an economic manner, while chemical disarmament and non- satisfying the concerns of proliferation regime. To date, the United States and other however, Moscow’s ratification VIEWPOINT: countries that conversion be has been delayed by political, irreversible and verifiable. economic, and environmental CONVERTING FORMER concerns associated with CW CW PRODUCTION destruction and the conversion SOVIET CHEMICAL ACTIVITIES of former Soviet chemical weapon production facilities WEAPONS PLANTS Before, during, and after (CWPFs) to legitimate com- World War II, the Soviet by Jonathan B. Tucker mercial activities.1 Union produced many tens of thousands of tons of chemi- Whereas American CWPFs cal weapons (both blister were all single-purpose military facilities that have lain and nerve agents) at multiple facilities, most of them in dormant for years, former Soviet CWPFs are integrated the Volga River basin.4 On April 10, 1987, President into large civilian chemical production complexes and Mikhail Gorbachev declared that the Soviet Union would share the same industrial infrastructure. For example, sev- henceforth cease all development and production of CW eral buildings that once produced nerve agents are em- agents.
    [Show full text]