115. Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability, Vol. 18

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

115. Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability, Vol. 18 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability Vol. 18 Compiled by Oscar Sheynin Berlin 2020 Contents I am the author of all the contributions listed below Notation I. Prehistory of the theory of probability, 1974 II. Poisson and statistics, 2012 III. Simon Newcomb as a statistician, 2002 IV. Mathematical treatment of astronomical observations, 1973 V. Gauss and geodetic observations, 1994 VI. Gauss, Bessel and the adjustment of triangulation, 2001 VII. The theory of probability. Definition and relation with statistics, 1998 [email protected] 2 Notation Notation S, G, n refers to downloadable file n placed on my website www.sheynin.de which is being diligently copied by Google (Google, Oscar Sheynin, Home). I apply this notation in case of sources either rare or those in my translation into English. L, M, R = Leningrad, Moscow, in Russian 3 I On the Prehistory of the Theory of Probability Arch. Hist. Ex. Sci., vol. 12, N. 2, 1974, pp. 97 – 141 1. Introduction Evidently, none of the traditional sciences busies itself about the accidental, says ARISTOTLE1, continuing that this (the accidental) none of the recognized sciences considers, but only sophistic‚ and repeats himself m other places2. However, this opinion is wide of the mark since neither does the modern theory of probability busy itself with chance, but rather with the laws of chance, with the probable2a. And ARISTOTLE describes rhetoric as an art of persuasion based on probabilities (§ 3.2). Moreover, reasoning on the probable abound in various sciences in antiquity. The study of this aspect of various sciences before the origin of the theory of probability (i. e., before the second half of the 17th century) is attempted in §§ 3 – 8 while § 2 is devoted mainly to ARISTOTLE and his notable commentator, THOMAS AQUINAS. § 9 is a short account of appropriate philosophical reasoning in the new time with a special reference to JAKOB BERNOULLI, and general conclusions are formulated in § 10. It proved difficult to incorporate the prehistory of the theory of errors into this article, and it has been dealt with separately3. 2. Randomness and Probability in Antique Philosophy 2.1. Prior to ARlSTOTLE. The period prior to ARISTOTLE is known partly, possibly even mostly, from his own account4. Thus (196a 10) Certainly the early physicists found no place for chance among the causes which they recognized. … This is strange, whether they supposed that there is no such thing as chance or whether they … omitted to mention it and that too when they sometimes used it, as Empedocles does. … He tells us that most of the parts of animals came to be by chance. There are some too who ascribe this heavenly sphere and all the worlds to spontaneity. … This statement might well cause surprise. For they are asserting that chance is not responsible for the existence or generation of animals and plants, nature or mind yet they assert that the heavenly sphere and the divinest of visible things arose spontaneously. Others, continues ARISTOTLE (196b 5), believe that chance is a cause, ... but that it is inscrutable to human intelligence. … Still others (195b 35) say that nothing happens by chance. In each case the unnamed person(s) is DEMOCRITUS, says the editor of ARISTOTLE. The ambiguity of DEMOCRITUS in his attitude towards chance, which ARISTOTL'E does not mention, seems genuine. This is proved by comparing the opinions of various ancient commentators, including PLATO. Indeed, some of them thought that, according to DEMOCRITUS, people made a fetish of 4 chance so as to conceal their own want of sense while others ascribed to him the explanation of everything by chance5. 2.2. ARISTOTLE. He was the first to attempt an explanation of chance. He included this explanation in the general context of his teaching of causes6, repeatedly mentioned chance, and also accidents and coincidents. An accident, says ARISTOTLE7, actually introducing this term into classical philosophy, is something which may possibly either belong or not belong to any one and the selfsame thing. As to chance (and change), these8 are characteristic of the perishable things of the earth. Some effects can be caused incidentally, i.e., by spontaneity and chance (198a 5); chance is opposed to mind and reason9 and its cause cannot be determined10. The products of chance and fortune are opposed to what is, or comes to be, always or usually. Similar assertions are made about accidents12, chance conjunctions13 and coincidences14. ARISTOTLE also distinguishes between chance and spontaneity15: Chance and what results from chance are appropriate to agents that are capable of good fortune and of moral action generally. Therefore necessarily chance is in the sphere of moral actions. The spontaneous on the other hand is found both in the lower animals and in many inanimate objects. Possibly the best account of ARISTOTLE’S concept of chance is given in a rather rare source by JULIENNE JUNKERSFELD16: by chance ARISTOTLE means something which takes place Occasionally; has the character of an end; is such that it might have been the object of a natural or of a rational appetite; was not in fact the object of any appetite but came into being by accident. As shown above, the circularity of this definition is indeed present in ARISTOTLE’S writings. JUNKERSFELD (p. 78) also mentions the essential difference between chance as understood by ARISTOTLE and in the modern sense: in the latter case chance is not connected with intention (or, rather, with its non-fulfilment)‚ but it seems that by referring only to COURNOT she overestimates his role in the formation of the concept of chance. I mention now three examples of chance events given by ARISTOTLE17 (JUNKERSFELD mentions a dozen): Digging a hole for a plant, someone finds a treasure (not a rusty nail, which can hardly be the object of a natural or of a rational appetite). ARISTOTLE calls this an accident in its first meaning (which actually is the same as chance). I notice that the difficulty of dividing unexpected events into remarkable and usual is here considerably less than in a similar division of outcomes of a random event in natural science needed for evaluating the probability of remarkable outcomes. A meeting of two persons which takes place by chance. Mistakes in the operations of nature which give rise to monstrosities. The first departure of nature from the type is that the offspring should become female instead of male; … as it is possible for the male sometimes not to prevail over the female … either through youth or age or some other such cause. 5 Thus ARISTOTLE attributes the birth of a female to chance, adding though that this is a natural necessity. Then, in general, for ARISTOTLE the outcome of a chance event depends on rather small changes in the chain (chains) of previous events. Of course, this is true only if his connection of chance with non-fulfilment of intention is disregarded. This general illustration is the same as was used by POINCARÉ18: a chance event takes place when, in conditions of an unstable equilibrium‚ very slight causes determine considerable effects. ARISTOTLE connects the chance occurrence of sex with natural necessity, i. e. with a definite (optimal) ratio of males and females for any given species. Though he does not elaborate, this seems to be the first statement connecting chance and necessity. ARISTOTLE’S writings also contain reasoning on the probable. A probability19 Is a generally approved proposition: what men know to happen or not to happen, to be or not to be, for the most part thus and thus ..., e. g. the envious hate. Formulating what actually is a rather weak corollary of the strong law of large numbers, ARISTOTLE20 notices that what is improbable does happen … therefore it is probable that improbable things will happen. On the other hand, ARISTOTLE understands that a very rare event either in games of chance or in nature is impossible (see § 5). He also describes rhetoric as an art of persuasion based on probabilities (§ 3.2) and, speaking about persuasion in poetry and anticipating ARCESILAS and CARNEADES, he even introduces a rudimentary scale of subjective probabilities21: a likely impossibility is always preferable to an unconvincing possibility. Several times ARISTOTLE mentions luck22 and fortune23. His understanding of these concepts is that they qualitatively express deviations from reasonable expectation, which is another qualitative notion. Even if expectation is understood as a numerical measure in the sense of the classical theory of probability, ARISTOTLE’S luck and fortune will still differ from the concepts used by Jakob BERNOULLI: although in one place ARISTOTLE (1361 b – 1362 a) holds that luck equally means luck accruing beyond expectation or escape from expected evil, elsewhere he (1207a 30) supposes that Good fortune would seem to consist to a greater extent and more properly in the obtaining of good … while the escaping of evil is a piece of good fortune indirectly. ARISTOTLE in fact qualifies his own opinion on the impossibility of a science of the accidental (§ 1) when he24 attributes strategy and navigation to matters involving art, but into which chance largely enters. However, he refutes his own qualification by saying (1247a 20) that in navigation not the cleverest are the most fortunate, but it is as in throwing dice. Does this really mean that there can be no science of navigation? A saner opinion is (PLATO25) that, though Chance is almost everything in the arts of the … pilot, and the physician (§ 6), and the general26 … yet in a storm there must surely be a great advantage in having the aid of the pilot’s art. 6 S. SAMBURSKY27 quotes SIMPLICIUS as saying that PLATO (and ARISTOTLE) called natural science the science of the probable (ecotologia).
Recommended publications
  • Life with Augustine
    Life with Augustine ...a course in his spirit and guidance for daily living By Edmond A. Maher ii Life with Augustine © 2002 Augustinian Press Australia Sydney, Australia. Acknowledgements: The author wishes to acknowledge and thank the following people: ► the Augustinian Province of Our Mother of Good Counsel, Australia, for support- ing this project, with special mention of Pat Fahey osa, Kevin Burman osa, Pat Codd osa and Peter Jones osa ► Laurence Mooney osa for assistance in editing ► Michael Morahan osa for formatting this 2nd Edition ► John Coles, Peter Gagan, Dr. Frank McGrath fms (Brisbane CEO), Benet Fonck ofm, Peter Keogh sfo for sharing their vast experience in adult education ► John Rotelle osa, for granting us permission to use his English translation of Tarcisius van Bavel’s work Augustine (full bibliography within) and for his scholarly advice Megan Atkins for her formatting suggestions in the 1st Edition, that have carried over into this the 2nd ► those generous people who have completed the 1st Edition and suggested valuable improvements, especially Kath Neehouse and friends at Villanova College, Brisbane Foreword 1 Dear Participant Saint Augustine of Hippo is a figure in our history who has appealed to the curiosity and imagination of many generations. He is well known for being both sinner and saint, for being a bishop yet also a fellow pilgrim on the journey to God. One of the most popular and attractive persons across many centuries, his influence on the church has continued to our current day. He is also renowned for his influ- ence in philosophy and psychology and even (in an indirect way) art, music and architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Technical Analysis Lo “A Movement Is Over When the News Is Out,” So Goes Photo: MIT the Evolution the Wall Street Maxim
    Hasanhodzic $29.95 USA / $35.95 CAN PRAISE FOR The Evolution of Technical Analysis Lo “A movement is over when the news is out,” so goes Photo: MIT Photo: The Evolution the Wall Street maxim. For thousands of years, tech- ANDREW W. LO is the Harris “Where there is a price, there is a market, then analysis, and ultimately a study of the analyses. You don’t nical analysis—marred with common misconcep- & Harris Group Professor of Finance want to enter this circle without a copy of this book to guide you through the bazaar and fl ash.” at MIT Sloan School of Management tions likening it to gambling or magic and dismissed —Dean LeBaron, founder and former chairman of Batterymarch Financial Management, Inc. and the director of MIT’s Laboratory by many as “voodoo fi nance”—has sought methods FINANCIAL PREDICTION of Technical Analysis for Financial Engineering. He has for spotting trends in what the market’s done and “The urge to fi nd order in the chaos of market prices is as old as civilization itself. This excellent volume published numerous papers in leading academic what it’s going to do. After all, if you don’t learn from traces the development of the tools and insights of technical analysis over the entire span of human history; FINANCIAL PREDICTION FROM BABYLONIAN history, how can you profi t from it? and practitioner journals, and his books include beginning with the commodity price and astronomical charts of Mesopotamia, through the Dow Theory The Econometrics of Financial Markets, A Non- of the early twentieth century—which forecast the Crash of 1929—to the analysis of the high-speed TABLETS TO BLOOMBERG TERMINALS Random Walk Down Wall Street, and Hedge Funds: electronic marketplace of today.
    [Show full text]
  • Leibniz on China and Christianity: the Reformation of Religion and European Ethics Through Converting China to Christianity
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Senior Projects Spring 2016 Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects Spring 2016 Leibniz on China and Christianity: The Reformation of Religion and European Ethics through Converting China to Christianity Ela Megan Kaplan Bard College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2016 Part of the European History Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Kaplan, Ela Megan, "Leibniz on China and Christianity: The Reformation of Religion and European Ethics through Converting China to Christianity" (2016). Senior Projects Spring 2016. 279. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2016/279 This Open Access work is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been provided to you by Bard College's Stevenson Library with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this work in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Leibniz on China and Christianity: The Reformation of Religion and European Ethics through Converting China to Christianity Senior Project submitted to The Division of Social Studies Of Bard College by Ela Megan Kaplan Annandale-on-Hudson, New York May 2016 5 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my mother, father and omniscient advisor for tolerating me for the duration of my senior project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Metaphysical Foundations Underlying Augustine's Solution to the Problem of Evil
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 11-30-2007 Between Being and Nothingness: The Metaphysical Foundations Underlying Augustine's Solution to the Problem of Evil Brian Keith Kooy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Kooy, Brian Keith, "Between Being and Nothingness: The Metaphysical Foundations Underlying Augustine's Solution to the Problem of Evil." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2007. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/32 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BETWEEN BEING AND NOTHINGNESS: THE METAPHYSICAL FOUNDATIONS UNDERLYING AUGUSTINE’S SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM OF EVIL by BRIAN KEITH KOOY Under the Direction of Dr. Timothy M. Renick ABSTRACT Several commentators make the claim that Augustine is not a systematic thinker. The purpose of this thesis is to refute that claim in one specific area of Augustine's thought, the metaphysical foundations underlying his solutions to the problem of evil. Through an exegetical examination of various works in which Augustine writes on evil, I show that his solutions for both natural and moral evil rely on a coherent metaphysical system,
    [Show full text]
  • Title : Random Number Generator: Testing and Whitening. Co
    Title : Random number generator: testing and whitening. Co-Encadrants : Andrei ROMASHCHENKO and Alexander SHEN (LIRMM) contact for more detail : [email protected], [email protected] Keywords : random number generators, statistical tests Prerequisites : The candidate should have programming skills and some knowledge in probability theory. Abstract : Generation of random bits is a classical problem known in the context of pseudo-random generators and also in connection with of truly ran- dom physical processes (there exist electronic devices that produce random bits using an unpredictable physical noise or intrinsically nondeterministic quantum phenomena). However, the quality of physical generators of random bits remains badly founded and poorly tested. The first objective of this pro- ject is an experimental study of the validity and quality of several physical random numbers generators. When we talk about the quality of random or pseudo-random genera- tors, we have to use randomness tests. The second objective of the project is an inventory and revision of statistical tests for random and pseudo-random generators. We suggest to improve the quality of statistical tests and de- velop new techniques of “whitening” that improves the quality of non-ideal sources of random bits. Another axis of the project is a conversion of various probabilistic proofs into unconventional randomness tests. Some more detail : Randomness (in a form of sequences of random bits, random numbers, and so on) is widely used in computer science in crypto- graphy, in randomized algorithms, in various simulations, etc. So the question arises : where can we obtain necessary random digits suitable for randomi- zed computations and communication protocols ? In some applications even a simple pseudo-random generator would cope with a task.
    [Show full text]
  • Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, the Humanist Agenda and the Scientific Method
    3237827: M.Sc. Dissertation Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, the humanist agenda and the scientific method Kundan Misra A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Research), University of New South Wales School of Mathematics and Statistics Faculty of Science University of New South Wales Submitted August 2011 Changes completed September 2012 THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Misra First name: Kundan Other name/s: n/a Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: MSc School: Mathematics and Statistics Faculty: Science Title: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, the humanist agenda and the scientific method Abstract 350 words maximum: Modernity began in Leibniz’s lifetime, arguably, and due to the efforts of a group of philosopher-scientists of which Leibniz was one of the most significant active contributors. Leibniz invented machines and developed the calculus. He was a force for peace, and industrial and cultural development through his work as a diplomat and correspondence with leaders across Europe, and in Russia and China. With Leibniz, science became a means for improving human living conditions. For Leibniz, science must begin with the “God’s eye view” and begin with an understanding of how the Creator would have designed the universe. Accordingly, Leibniz advocated the a priori method of scientific discovery, including the use of intellectual constructions or artifices. He defended the usefulness and success of these methods against detractors. While cognizant of Baconian empiricism, Leibniz found that an unbalanced emphasis on experiment left the investigator short of conclusions on efficient causes.
    [Show full text]
  • Measures of Maximal Entropy for Shifts of Finite Type
    Measures of maximal entropy for shifts of finite type Ben Sherman July 7, 2013 Contents Preface 2 1 Introduction 9 2 Dynamical systems 10 3 Topological entropy 13 4 Measure-preserving dynamical systems 20 5 Measure-theoretic entropy 22 6 Parry measure 27 7 Conclusion 30 Appendix: Deriving the Parry measure 30 1 Preface Before I get to the technical material, I thought I might provide a little non-technical background as to why randomness is so interesting, and why unpredictable dynamical systems (i.e., dynamical systems with positive entropy) provide an interesting explanation of randomness. What is randomness? \How dare we speak of the laws of chance? Is not chance the antithesis of all law?" |Joseph Bertrand, Calcul des probabilit´es, 1889 Throughout history, phenomena which could not be understood in a mundane sense have been ascribed to fate. After all, if something cannot be naturally understood, what else but a supernatural power can explain it? Concepts of chance and randomness thus have been closely associated with actions of deities. After all, for something to be random, it must, by definition, defy all explanation. Many ancient cultures were fascinated with games of chance, such as throwing dice or flipping coins, and interpreted their outcomes as prescriptions of fate. To play a game of chance was to probe the supernatural world. In ancient Rome, the goddess Fortuna was the deity who determined fortune and fate; the two concepts were naturally inseparable. Randomness, in many ways, is simply a lack of understanding. Democritus of an- cient Greece realized the subjectivity of randomness with an explanatory story (Wikipedia, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Technical Analysis Lo “A Movement Is Over When the News Is Out,” So Goes Photo: MIT the Evolution the Wall Street Maxim
    Hasanhodzic $29.95 USA / $35.95 CAN PRAISE FOR The Evolution of Technical Analysis Lo “A movement is over when the news is out,” so goes Photo: MIT Photo: The Evolution the Wall Street maxim. For thousands of years, tech- ANDREW W. LO is the Harris “Where there is a price, there is a market, then analysis, and ultimately a study of the analyses. You don’t nical analysis—marred with common misconcep- & Harris Group Professor of Finance want to enter this circle without a copy of this book to guide you through the bazaar and fl ash.” at MIT Sloan School of Management tions likening it to gambling or magic and dismissed —Dean LeBaron, founder and former chairman of Batterymarch Financial Management, Inc. and the director of MIT’s Laboratory by many as “voodoo fi nance”—has sought methods FINANCIAL PREDICTION of Technical Analysis for Financial Engineering. He has for spotting trends in what the market’s done and “The urge to fi nd order in the chaos of market prices is as old as civilization itself. This excellent volume published numerous papers in leading academic what it’s going to do. After all, if you don’t learn from traces the development of the tools and insights of technical analysis over the entire span of human history; FINANCIAL PREDICTION FROM BABYLONIAN history, how can you profi t from it? and practitioner journals, and his books include beginning with the commodity price and astronomical charts of Mesopotamia, through the Dow Theory The Econometrics of Financial Markets, A Non- of the early twentieth century—which forecast the Crash of 1929—to the analysis of the high-speed TABLETS TO BLOOMBERG TERMINALS Random Walk Down Wall Street, and Hedge Funds: electronic marketplace of today.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Papers on the History of Probability and Statistics Translated by the Author Berlin 2004 (C) Oscar Sheynin
    Russian Papers on the History of Probability and Statistics Translated by the Author Berlin 2004 (C) Oscar Sheynin www.sheynin.de Contents Introduction 1. Review of Kendall, M.G., Doig, A.G. Bibliography of Statistical Literature Pre-1940 with Supplements to the Volumes for 1940 – 1949 and 1950 – 1958. Edinburgh, 1968. Novye Knigi za Rubezhom , ser. A, No. 10, 1969, 2. On the work of Adrain in the theory of errors. Istoriko-Matematicheskie Issledovania (IMI), vol. 16, 1965, pp. 325 – 336 3. On the history of the iterative methods of solving systems of linear algebraic equations. Trudy IX Nauchn Konf. Aspirantov i Mladsh. Nauchn. Sotrundn. Inst. Istorii Estestvoznania iTekhniki , Sektsia istorii fiz. i mat. nauk. Moscow, 1966, pp. 8 – 12 4. On selection and adjustment of direct observations. Izvestia Vuzov. Geodezia i Aerofotos’emka No. 2, 1966, pp. 107 – 112 5. On the history of the adjustment of indirect observations. Ibidem, No. 3, 1967, pp. 25 – 32 6. Some Issues in the History of the Theory of Errors. Abstract of dissertation. Moscow, 1967. Published as a manuscript. Inst. Istorii Estestvoznania i Tekhniki 7. On the work of Bayes in the theory of probability. Trudy XII Nauchn. Konf. Aspirantov i Mladsh. Nauchn. Sotrudn. Inst. Istorii Estestvoznania I Tekhniki , Sektsia istorii mat. i mekh. nauk. Moscow, 1969, pp. 40 – 57 8. On the history of the De Moivre – Laplace limit theorem. Istoria i Metodologia Estestven. Nauk , vol. 9, 1970, pp. 199 – 211 9. On the appearance of the Dirac delta-function in a memoir of Laplace. IMI, vol. 20, 1975, pp. 303 – 308 10.
    [Show full text]
  • On Randomness As a Principle of Structure and Computation in Neural Networks
    Research Collection Doctoral Thesis On randomness as a principle of structure and computation in neural networks Author(s): Weissenberger, Felix Publication Date: 2018 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000312548 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library Felix Weissenberger On randomness as a principle of structure and com- putation in neural networks Diss. ETH No. 25298 2018 ONRANDOMNESSASAPRINCIPLEOFSTRUCTURE AND COMPUTATION IN NEURAL NETWORKS Diss. ETH No. 25298 On randomness as a principle of structure and computation in neural networks A thesis submitted to attain the degree of DOCTOROFSCIENCES of ETHZURICH (Dr. sc. ETH Zurich) presented by FELIXWEISSENBERGER MSc ETH in Theoretical Computer Science born on 04.08.1989 citizen of Germany accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Angelika Steger Prof. Dr. Jean-Pascal Pfister Dr. Johannes Lengler 2018 Contents Abstract iii Zusammenfassung v Thanks vii 1 Introduction 1 2 Emergence of synfire chains 19 3 Rate based learning with short stimuli 79 4 Mutual inhibition with few inhibitory cells 109 5 Lognormal synchrony in CA1 125 Bibliography 163 i Abstract This work examines the role of randomness in structure and informa- tion processing of biological neural networks and how it may improve our understanding of the nervous system. Our approach is motivated by the pragmatic observation that many components and processes in the brain are intrinsically stochastic. Therefore, probability theory and its methods are particularly well suited for its analysis and modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Randomness Extractors in Mobile Devices
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY FACULTY}w¡¢£¤¥¦§¨ OF I !"#$%&'()+,-./012345<yA|NFORMATICS Randomness extractors in mobile devices MASTER’S THESIS Filip Jurneˇcka Brno, Spring 2010 Declaration Hereby I declare, that this paper is my original authorial work, which I have worked out by my own. All sources, references and literature used or excerpted during elaboration of this work are properly cited and listed in complete reference to the due source. Brno, May 25, 2010 Filip Jurneˇcka Advisor: RNDr. Jan Bouda, Ph.D. ii Acknowledgement I would like to thank my mother for her unyielding support and belief in me. I would also like to thank all of those who helped me to get through my studies. iii Abstract Objective of this thesis is to give an overview of the problematics of ran- domness extractors with focus on searching an extractor suitable for gen- erating random numbers for cryptographic applications in mobile devices. Selected extractors based on their suitability for given application will be implemented in mobile device on a platform chosen by student. iv Keywords Evaluation hash, extractor, JavaME, mobile, pseudorandom, randomness, shift register hash, truly random, weak source. v Contents Chapter outline . 3 1 Introduction ............................... 5 1.1 Troubles with implementations of PRNGs ........... 6 1.2 Usage of randomness ....................... 7 1.2.1 Deterministic vs randomized algorithms . 7 1.2.2 Randomness in cryptography . 10 2 Sources of randomness ........................ 13 2.1 Definitions ............................. 13 2.2 Weak random sources ...................... 15 3 Randomness extractors ........................ 20 3.1 Preliminaries ............................ 20 3.2 Definitions ............................. 23 3.3 Tradeoffs .............................. 24 3.3.1 Simulating BPP . 24 3.3.2 Lower bounds .
    [Show full text]
  • A Mathematical Revolutionary
    COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS HISTORY Euler dominated almost all branches of mathematics, as well as physics, astronomy and engineering, during the Enlightenment era. Euler’s mathematics was often ahead of A mathematical his time: he foreshadowed the use of groups of symmetries, the topology of networks, decision theory and the theory of sets (he was, for instance, the first to draw Venn revolutionary diagrams). Nearly alone among his contem- poraries, he advocated for the beauty and importance of number theory. His work on Davide Castelvecchi reviews a hefty biography of the prime numbers, in particular, set the stage prolific Enlightenment luminary Leonhard Euler. for a golden age of mathematics that would follow decades later. However, Euler’s greatest legacy, in both pure and applied mathematics, was the field of analysis. Seventeenth-century mathema- ticians, culminating with Isaac Newton and RIGB/SPL his arch-enemy Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, had founded calculus — the study of the rates of change of quantities in time (dif- ferentials or derivatives) and the intimately related idea of areas between curves (inte- grals). Euler’s analysis turned calculus into a powerful science and endowed mathematics and physics with their modern language and appearance. The founders of calculus often grasped at concepts that they could not fully understand. The field relied on infinitesimals, which had a metaphysical aura so controversial that they were in part responsible for getting Galileo Galilei in hot water with the Catholic Church, according to historian of mathematics Amir Alexander (Infinitesimal (Oneworld, 2014); see Nature http://doi.org/9hz; 2014). In Euler’s time, that controversy was still far from resolved.
    [Show full text]