Public Goods?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Goods? DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES AGRICULTURE WHAT TOOLS FOR THE EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL POLICY TO ENCOURAGE THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC GOODS? STUDY This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development. AUTHORS Ms Kaley Hart, Mr David Baldock, IEEP Mr Peter Weingarten, Mr Bernhard Osterburg, vTI Mr Andrea Povellato, Mr Francesco Vanni, INEA Mr Corrado Pirzio-Biroli, Ms Alison Boyes, RISE Foundation RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Mr Albert Massot Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE Mrs Catherine Morvan LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in May 2011. Brussels, © European Parliament, 2011 This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES AGRICULTURE WHAT TOOLS FOR THE EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL POLICY TO ENCOURAGE THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC GOODS? STUDY Abstract Agriculture plays an important role in the provision of a wide range of public goods in Europe, particularly regarding the environment and rural vitality. Appropriate policies are required to secure adequate provision in future. The Common Agricultural Policy potentially has a key role. This report examines some of the issues involved in reorienting the CAP for this purpose and proposes how it could be modified to contribute to the provision of public goods more effectively in the future. IP/B/AGRI/IC/2010_094 JUNE 2011 PE 460.053 EN What Tools for the European Agricultural Policy to Encourage the Provision of Public Goods ____________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS Contents 3 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 5 LIST OF TABLES 7 LIST OF FIGURES 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 1. Background and Context 17 2. Public Goods Associated With Agriculture 19 2.1. Public goods associated with agriculture 19 2.2. Evidence of the undersupply of public goods 22 2.3. Current policy measures delivering public goods 27 3. Developing policy tools for delivering public goods associated with agriculture 37 3.1. Existing proposals for the CAP post 2013 38 3.2. Issues under consideration and assumptions 39 3.3. Clarity on strategic objectives of the future CAP 41 3.4. Effectiveness and efficiency in achieving outcomes 46 3.5. Budgetary/financing issues 58 4. Improved policy structure and tools for the delivery of public goods 65 4.2. Implications of the proposals 77 5. Non CAP measures for the delivery of public goods 81 5.1. Habitat banking 81 5.2. Contracts for water services 83 6. Conclusions and principal Recommendations 87 References 91 List of Communications, Directives, Regulations, Strategies cited in the report 101 Annex 1: Evidence of Undersupply of environmental public goods 105 Annex 2: Acknowledgements 111 3 PE 460.053 Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 PE 460.053 What Tools for the European Agricultural Policy to Encourage the Provision of Public Goods ____________________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 6EAP 6th Environmental Action Plan ADAS Agricultural Development and Advisory Services ADE Analysis for Economic Decisions AGRI European Parliament Agriculture and Rural Development Committee BBOP Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme CA Cooperative Agreement CAP Common Agricultural Policy CH4 Methane CLA Country Land and Business Association CMEF Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework CO2 Carbon Dioxide EBCC European Bird Census Council ECA European Court of Auditors EEA European Environment Agency EAFRD European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development EAGGF European Agriculture Guidance and Guarantee Fund ENRD European Network for Rural Development ERDF European Regional Development Fund EU European Union EU-27 All 27 Member States of the European Union EU-15 The 15 Member States of the European Union prior to the 2004 enlargement EU-12 The 12 Member States of the European Union which have joined since 2004 FADN Farm Accountancy Data Network FAS Farm Advisory Service GAEC Good Agriculture and Environmental Condition GHG Greenhouse Gas (emissions) HNV High Nature Value IACS Integrated Administration and Control System IAMO Institute for Agricultural Development in mid and eastern Europe 5 PE 460.053 Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ILUC Indirect Land Use Change IRENA Indicator Reporting on the Integration of Environmental Concerns into Agricultural Policy JRC Joint Research Council LAG Local Action Group LFA Less Favoured Area LIFE+ EU Financial Instrument for the Environment LUC Land Use Change MFF Multi-annual Financial Framework OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development PDO Protected Designation of Origin PGI Protected Geographical Indication RED Renewable Energy Directive RDP Rural Development Programme RSPB Royal Society for the Protection of Birds SAC Scottish Agricultural College SAPS Single Area Payment Scheme SEBI Streamlining European 2010 Biodiversity Indicators SER Social and Economic Council of the Netherlands SFP Single Farm Payment SMR Statutory Management Requirement TEEB The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity TSG Traditional Speciality Guaranteed UNFCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change WFD Water Framework Directive WTO World Trade Organization 6 PE 460.053 What Tools for the European Agricultural Policy to Encourage the Provision of Public Goods ____________________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 The main public goods associated with agriculture 21 TABLE 2 EU legislative and Policy Objectives relating to public goods 26 TABLE 3 Member State use of Article 68 for environmental purposes 31 TABLE 4 Pillar 2 measures which can contribute to the provision of public goods 33 TABLE 5 Pros and cons of different approaches to delivering Group 2 measures 73 TABLE 6 Potential revisions to current GAEC Standards 76 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 Potential siting of public good focused measures within the future CAP 75 7 PE 460.053 Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 PE 460.053 What Tools for the European Agricultural Policy to Encourage the Provision of Public Goods ____________________________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background and context Agriculture has an important role in the provision of a wide range of public goods in Europe. This is recognised both in the ‘Lyon Report’ on the future of the CAP after 2013 and the ‘Dess Report’ currently being debated in the European Parliament. The European Commission’s Communication of November 2010 ‘The CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future’ (COM (2010) 672 final) sets out three key objectives for the CAP to 2020: viable food production, sustainable management of natural resources and climate action, and balanced territorial development. All three objectives relate to the provision of public goods by land managers in one form or another. The theme was elaborated in an unprecedented joint letter dated 11 March 2011, from Commissioners Cioloş (agriculture), Potočnik (environment) and Hedegaard (climate). They highlight that ‘the CAP is an effective tool which the EU has at its disposal for steering towards more sustainable management of natural resources’, that it ‘should be a tool to help Member States to reach environmental and climate change targets, notably in relation to biodiversity, water and soil’, and that ‘to deliver environmental public goods, agriculture must be a viable and competitive sector.’ However, the proposals for converting these general propositions into more specific policies and tools that could be applied within the CAP remain rather vague. This report, at the request of the European Parliament, sets out to examine some of the issues involved in moving towards a more public goods oriented CAP and puts forward recommendations on how the CAP might be restructured over time to deliver public goods more effectively. Public goods associated with agriculture The principal public goods associated with agriculture in Europe can be summarised as: Environmental, notably farmland biodiversity, water quality and availability, soil functionality, air quality, climate stability (reducing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing carbon storage), resilience to flooding and fire. Culturally valued agricultural landscapes. Rural vitality (the social, economic and cultural viability and vigour of rural societies). Farm animal welfare.
Recommended publications
  • A Guide to CAP Reform Politics: Issues, Positions and Dynamics
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Zahrnt, Valentin Working Paper A guide to CAP reform politics: Issues, positions and dynamics ECIPE Working Paper, No. 03/2011 Provided in Cooperation with: European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE), Brussels Suggested Citation: Zahrnt, Valentin (2011) : A guide to CAP reform politics: Issues, positions and dynamics, ECIPE Working Paper, No. 03/2011, European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE), Brussels This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/174846 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu ECIPE WORKING PAPER • No. 03/2011 A GUIDE TO CAP REFORM POLITICS: ISSUES, POSITIONS AND DYNAMICS By Valentin Zahrnt Valentin Zahrnt is a Senior Fellow at the European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) and Editor of www.reformthecap.eu.
    [Show full text]
  • 0423 MINUTES of the Meeting of 23 April 2013, from 16.45 to 17.45
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia DSAS_PV(2013)0423 MINUTES of the meeting of 23 April 2013, from 16.45 to 17.45 Brussels The meeting opened at 16.45 on Tuesday, 23 April 2013, with Jean Lambert (Chair) in the chair. 1. Adoption of the draft agenda The agenda was adopted. 2. Adoption of the minutes of 19 March 2013 The minutes were adopted. 3. Announcements by the Chair The Chair made the following points: 1) Conference of Delegation Chairs I would like to report back to Members on the last Conference of Delegation Chairs meeting which was held in Strasbourg last week. It is concerning to note the increasing number of decisions which are being taken by the Secretary General without debate. The most recent is on the availability of interpreters for delegation meetings which have been allocated Thursday afternoons as a viable time. Unfortunately, as we are well aware, most Members need to return to their national constituencies by Thursday afternoons, so this is not a viable option for the delegation. This is a concerning development as it limits the participation of Members and staff who rely on the interpreters services. Ongoing issues remain regarding the budget and travel allowance for delegations, and the fact that this does not adequately take into account multi-country delegations or those with PV\935068EN.doc PE510.439v01-00 EN United in diversity EN countries who cannot easily conduct visits to Brussels. This is possibly something Members could discuss with their Group Presidents, and I will continue to follow up within the Conference of Delegation Chairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Versandprotokoll Einladung
    Für diese Aussendung (nach dem Informationsfreiheits-Gesetz) habe ich mich entschieden, nachdem ich am 1.2.2012 auf Rügen, nach dem Besuch des Grundbuchamts überfallen, bedroht und schwer verletzt wurde. Die Drohung lautete u.a.: „ Keine Polizei wie in Binz 2010“, wo die Staatsanwaltschaft in einem ähnlichen Vorgang das Verfahren eingestellt hat. Mehr Infos auf Anfrage, s. Internet Peter Heimig. Wo bleibt die Fürsorge der Verantwortlichen für R2P? From:“Heimig“ <[email protected]> To: Merkel ([email protected]); BPrA ([email protected]); internetpost@bundeskanzlerin; Bundespräsidialamt ; Bundesregierung Internetpost; Merkel Bundestag([email protected]); A. Merkel CDU ([email protected]); Presse bpra.bund; Hess. Staatskanzlei Bouffier ([email protected]); CDU ([email protected]); Hahn Justizminister Hessen ([email protected]); Hessisches Justizministerium (redaktion- [email protected]); Kreisverband FDP Hessen ([email protected]); Hessen Justizministerium ([email protected]); Bouffier ([email protected]); Bcc: Ackermann ([email protected]); Aiwanger ([email protected]); Radwan (stimmkreisbuero@alexander- radwan.de); Arnold ([email protected]); Aures ([email protected]); Bachhuber, CSU ([email protected]); Barfuß ([email protected]); Bausback ([email protected]); Bause, Gruen ([email protected]); Beckstein ([email protected]); Bernhard, Otmar Dr. CSU ([email protected]);
    [Show full text]
  • Annuaire Officiel De L'union Europøenne
    Donnes à jour au 23 dcembre 2004 Annuaire officiel de l’Union europenne 2005 UNION EUROPÉENNE Avis au lecteur Cette publication parat une fois par an, en trois langues: allemand, anglais et franÅais. Son contenu reprend les organigrammes des institutions, organes, agences et organismes de l’Union europenne jusqu’au niveau des responsables des entits oprationnelles de base. Une version lectronique, actualise rgulirement, peut Þtre consulte sur l’internet via le serveur Europa (http://europa.eu.int/idea). En raison du nombre et de la complexit des intituls des fonctions à grer dans les diffrentes versions linguistiques, il ne nous est pas possible, pour l’instant, de prendre en compte les variantes fminin/masculin de celles-ci. Nous avons donc opt pour une dnomination unique à considrer comme neutre. Europe Direct est un service destin à vous aider à trouver des rponses aux questions que vous vous posez sur l’Union europenne. Un nouveau numro unique gratuit: 000 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 De nombreuses autres informations sur l’Union europenne sont disponibles sur l’internet via le serveur Europa (http://europa.eu.int). Une fiche bibliographique figure à la fin de l’ouvrage. Luxembourg: Office des publications officielles des Communauts europennes, 2005 ISBN 92-78-40259-1 Communauts europennes, 2005 Reproduction autorise, moyennant mention de la source Printed in Luxembourg IMPRIM SUR PAPIER BLANCHI SANS CHLORE Table des matires Prsentation des institutions de l’Union europenne .............................. V Renseignements pratiques ...................................................... XVII ˆ Adresses postales des institutions . ........................................ XIX ˆ Liste des btiments . ........................................................ XXIII ˆ Plans d’accs aux btiments .
    [Show full text]
  • UID 2003 Nr. 3, Union in Deutschland
    RFSSER. SO MUSS f POUTIK IN NIEDER- SACHSEN WERDEN: Seite 19 Nummer 3 23. Januar 2003 ww.C du.de ANGELA MERKEL: INHALT Aus fünf Seiten schlichten LAURENZ MEYER: Die SPD-Fraktion hat Papiers ist ein Jahrhundert- eher Beton im Kopf als gute Ideen vertrag geworden SEITE 6-7 Als wichtigstes Fundament destag: „Aus fünf Seiten ANDREAS STORM schlichten Papiers ist ein der bilateralen Zusam- zum Milliardenloch in Jahrhundertvertrag gewor- menarbeit und der Versöh- der Rentenkasse: Der den." Damit auch jede Ge- nung beider Länder hat Beitrag wird im nächsten neration aufs Neue den Wert die Parteivorsitzende und Jahr auf mindestens dieser Freundschaft erfah- Vorsitzende der CDU/ 19,7 % ansteigen ren kann, dürfe vor allem CSU-Bundestagsfraktion SEITE 8 den deutsch-französischen das deutsch-französische Freundschaftsvertrag vom Freundschaftswerk nicht DOKU MENTATION 22. Januar 1963 gewürdigt. vernachlässigt werden und Zum 40. Jahrestag des Angela Merkel am 16. finanziell austrocknen. Elysee-Vertrags Januar im Deutschen Bun- Fortsetzung Seite 2 L CHRISTIAN WULFF: ' EUROPA Wir sind bereit, Union hat erheblichen die Regierung zu übernehmen Klärungsbedarf Der Spit- Fortsetzung von Seite I bedarf - insbesondere im zenkan- Zur künftigen Stellung des Zusammenhang mit der an- didat der Ratspräsidenten, auf die gestrebten Änderung der nieder- sich Chirac und Schröder EU-Verfassung, die nicht sächsi- verständigt haben, erklär- dazu führen dürfe, dass die schen te die Fraktionsvorsitzen- Position des Ratspräsiden- CDU, Christian Wulff, de, Deutschland habe bis- ten etwa auf Kosten der und sein „Zukunfts- lang die französische For- Kommission und des Parla- team Niedersachsen" derung einer Stärkung der ments gestärkt werde. haben ein 100-Punkte- Ratspräsidentschaft im- Sofortprogramm für mer abgelehnt.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Directory of the European Union
    ISSN 1831-6271 Regularly updated electronic version FY-WW-12-001-EN-C in 23 languages whoiswho.europa.eu EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN UNION Online services offered by the Publications Office eur-lex.europa.eu • EU law bookshop.europa.eu • EU publications OFFICIAL DIRECTORY ted.europa.eu • Public procurement 2012 cordis.europa.eu • Research and development EN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑ∆Α • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Ginčus Dėl Kai Kurių Europos Parlamento Narių
    C 226 E/52 Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys LT 15.9.2005 2004 m. gruodžio 14 d., antradienis 2. ginčus dėl kai kurių Europos Parlamento narių išrinkimo teisėtumo skelbia nepriimtinais ir nepagrįs- tais, šio sprendimo II priede pateikdamas priežastis dėl kiekvieno ginčo; 3. pakartoja prašymą kompetentingoms valstybių narių institucijoms pranešti Europos Parlamentui ne tik išrinktų narių pavardes, bet ir galimų juos pakeisiančių asmenų,išvardintų eilės tvarka pagal gautų balsų skaičių, pavardes; 4. ragina kompetentingas valstybių narių institucijas nedelsiant pranešti apie išrinktus narius, kad visi Parlamento nariai galėtų pradėti vykdyti savo įgaliojimus nuo pat pirmojo posėdžio; 5. kviečia atsakingas valstybių narių institucijas kiek įmanoma greičiau baigti joms pateiktų skundų nagri- nėjimą ir pranešti Europos Parlamentui apie rezultatus; 6. paveda Pirmininkui perduoti Parlamento atsakingam komitetui klausimą dėl Darbo tvarkos taisyklių 3 ir 4 straipsnių pakeitimo, kad jie būtų pritaikyti prie pakeisto 1976 m. rugsėjo 20 d. Akto ir kartu būtų apibrėžtos nuostatos, kuriomis Parlamentui būtų suteikiami įgaliojimai akivaizdžiais nesuderinamumo atve- jais, siekiant užtikrinti, kad visi Parlamento nariai galėtų pradėti vykdyti savo įgaliojimus nuo pat pirmojo posėdžio; 7. paveda Pirmininkui perduoti šį sprendimą kompetentingoms nacionalinėms institucijoms ir valstybių narių parlamentams. I PRIEDAS: Europos Parlamento narių, kurių mandatai paskelbti teisėtais, sąrašas VALSTYBĖSE NARĖSE Į EUROPOS PARLAMENTĄ IŠRINKTI NARIAI (2004 m. liepos 20 d. padėtis) Belgija (24 Parlamento nariai) Ivo BELET Frederika M. M. BREPOELS Philippe BUSQUIN Philip CLAEYS Véronique DE KEYSER Mia DE VITS Jean-Luc DEHAENE Gérard DEPREZ Koenraad DILLEN Antoine DUQUESNE Saïd EL KHADRAOUI Mathieu GROSCH Alain HUTCHINSON Pierre JONCKHEER Raymond LANGENDRIES Annemie NEYTS-UYTTEBROECK Frédérique RIES Bart STAES Dirk STERCKX Marc TARABELLA Marianne THYSSEN Johan VAN HECKE Anne VAN LANCKER Frank VANHECKE 15.9.2005 LT Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 226 E/53 2004 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]
  • Out of Balance
    INVESTIGATIONS BEST PRACTICE GREENPEACE JUNE 2017 INTERNAL 24 MAY, 2018 PUBLISHED BY GREENPEACE EUROPEAN UNIT RUE BELLIARD 199, 1040 BRUSSELS GREENPEACE.EU @GREENPEACEEU RESEARCH BY SARA URCIUOLI, LASSE VAN AKEN, IEVA VILIM & IVAN DIVKOVIC WRITTEN & EDITED BY JOHN HYLAND & MARCO CONTIERO ii INVESTIGATIONS BEST PRACTICE GREENPEACE JUNE 2017 INTERNAL CONTENTS Introduction 1 Europe’s broken farming system 2 The European Parliament’s role 3 Agriculture-industry majority 4 A note about the research 5 MEPs with strong links to the agriculture industry 6 MEPs with looser links to the agriculture industry 11 MEPs with no links, or very weak links, to the agriculture industry 12 References 14 i INVESTIGATIONS BEST PRACTICE GREENPEACE JUNE 2017 INTERNAL INTRODUCTION For 56 years, European farming has been guided by the European Union’s common agricultural policy (CAP) and the subsidies it distributes to European farmers. The CAP currently accounts for almost 40 percent of the EU’s total budget – €59 billion in 2017. As the EU carries out a policy review that will affect the CAP over the next seven years, there is concern that the interests of the agriculture industry could be given precedence over public health and the environment, and to the detriment of many European farmers. Greenpeace has investigated the farming links of members of the European Parliament’s agriculture committee (AGRI), which is a key player in the CAP negotiations. The research found that a majority of AGRI committee members, 25 out of 46, have strong links to the agriculture sector, and four more MEPs have looser links. This farming expertise is of course important in the reform of the CAP, but it should not eclipse the input of other experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Themen Anpacken Starke Stimme
    Ausgabe 1 9/2017 RICHARD GRAF ALOIS KARL ENDLICH ZUKUNFTS- STARKE STIMME THEMEN ANPACKEN NEUMARKTS IN HEUTE FÜR MORGEN WÄHLEN. BERLIN INHALT BERICHTE AUS DEN PARLAMENTEN Europaparlament: Albert Deß S. 5 Bundestag: Alois Karl S. 6 Landtag: Albert Füracker S. 7 EXTRA-THEMA Niedrigzinsphase - Altersarmut S. 8 WAHLKAMPF SPEZIAL Alois Karl - Bundestag S. 12 Richard Graf - OB-Kandidat S. 14 Stephan Meier - Liste Bundestag S. 16 KOMMUNALPOLITIK AKTUELL Kreistagsfraktion S. 17 Stadtrat: Portraits & Vorstellung S. 19 Stadtrat: Thema Innenstadt S. 20 Stadtrat: Weitere Themen S. 21 POLITIK VOR ORT Ferienprogramm der CSU S. 22 Stadtverband: Portraits & Vorstellung S. 24 Berichte aus den Ortsverbänden S. 25 NAMEN IM GESPRÄCH Impressionen S. 30 Ihnen spannende Berichte aus dem Ar- VORWORT beitsalltag unserer Mandatsträger, exklusi- ve Einblicke in die Neumarkter Kommunal- politik, Expertenmeinungen und zahlreiche interessante Berichte aus unseren 14 Orts- verbänden. Aus gegebenem Anlass thema- tisieren wir in der aktuellen Ausgabe die bevorstehende Oberbürgermeister- und Bundestagswahl in besonderer Form. Die Entstehung der „Raute“ kann als ge- meinschaftliches Großprojekt bezeichnet werden. Ohne einen starken CSU-Stadtver- band wäre dieses nicht realisierbar gewe- sen, weswegen es mich umso mehr freut, Liebe Leserinnen und Leser, Ihnen auf den folgenden Seiten auch einen kompakten Gesamtüberblick der einzelnen sie ist zurück! Lange hat sie auf sich warten Protagonisten der CSU Neumarkt zu geben. lassen. Aber was wäre der CSU-Stadtver- Eine gesunde Mischung aus Jung und Alt ist band Neumarkt ohne „Die Raute“? Zuletzt für uns an dieser Stelle essentiell. erschien sie Ende 2014 unter der Leitung von Helmut Jawurek, also vor über zwei- Was aber wäre die „Raute“ ohne ihre Leser? einhalb Jahren! An dieser Stelle gilt es, ein Was wäre die CSU Neumarkt ohne ihre Un- herzliches Dankeschön an ihn und sein terstützer? Es steht außer Frage, dass wir Team für die geleistete Arbeit auszuspre- nur mit Ihrer Unterstützung weiterhin zu- chen.
    [Show full text]
  • Geschäftsbericht
    Geschäftsbericht für den Zeitraum Juni 2007 bis Mai 2008 Vorgelegt zur DJV-Delegiertenversammlung 2008 in Weimar 2 DJV Geschäftsbericht 2007/2008 Inhalt 6 Vorwort 8 Der Deutsche Jagdschutz-Verband e. V. (DJV) Wer ist der DJV? Aufgaben und Ziele Präsidium DJV-Hauptgeschäftsstelle DJV-Service und Marketing GmbH (DSM) DJV-Stiftung natur + mensch – gemeinsam Zukunft stiften 12 Verbandswesen und internationale Angelegenheiten FACE und Europäisches Parlament Europäisches Parlament und Intergruppe „Nachhaltige Jagd, Biodiversität & Ländliche Aktivitäten CIC Internationale Jagdkonferenz (IJK) Deutsche Versuchs- und Prüf-Anstalt für Jagd- und Sportwaffen (DEVA) e. V. Bundesverband Schießstätten (BVS) Forum Waffenrecht e. V. Jagdgenossenschaften und Eigenjagdbesitzer Literaturstudie „Wirksamkeit und Fördermöglichkeit von Zusatzstrukturen in der Landwirtschaft Aktionsbündnis FORUM NATUR Modellvorhaben „Schwarzwildbewirtschaftung in der Agrarlandschaft – Probleme und Maßnahmen“ des Bundesministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten (BMELV) Deutscher Verkehrssicherheitsrat (DVR) Jagdhundewesen Sonstige Organisationen und Veranstaltungen 26 Rechtliche Angelegenheiten Auf EU-Ebene Änderung der EU-Waffenrichtlinie Auf Ebene des Europarates Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte gegen Luxemburg Urteil des EGMR stellt deutsches Reviersystem nicht in Frage Auf Bundesebene Änderung des Waffengesetzes Umweltgesetzbuch Novelle des nationalen Fleisch- und Gefl ügelfl eischhygienerechts 31 Natur- und Artenschutz Wildtier-Informationssystem
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Lists Ahead of the Elections to the European Parliament from a Gender Perspective
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS GENDER EQUALITY Electoral lists ahead of the elections to the European Parliament from a gender perspective STUDY Abstract Upon request of the FEMM Committee, this study provides a detailed analysis of the existing electoral systems for the European 2014 elections from a gender perspective in the 28 EU Member States. It also presents and scrutinises the electoral lists of the Member States from a gender perspective and presents the synthesis of the main findings from the lists. Some main conclusions are made on the basis of the mapping. They concern the relation between the adoption of legislated gender quotas and the implementation of quota provisions by national parties. PE 509.980 EN Document requested by the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality AUTHORS Fondazione Giacomo Brodolini Ms Lenita Freidenvall Ms Hedvig Stahre Ms Silvia Sansonetti REVISOR Ms Elisabeth Victoria Lasky RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Ms Erika Schulze Policy Department C - Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy Departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny. To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] European Parliament, manuscript completed in May 2014. © European Union, Brussels, 2014. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]