DOCSLIB.ORG

Violent Crime

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Violent Crime U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Bureau of Justice Statistics Selected Findings April 1994, NCJ-147486 Violent Crime During the last 20 years, victims have The violent crime rate in 1992 was lower than in the early 1980's described more than 119 million violent victimizations of rape, robbery, or as- Rate per 1,000 persons age 12 or older sault in interviews for the National 40 Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) Total violent crime sponsors this continuous household survey as the only national effort to provide accurate measures of crimes Assault of violence and theft, both those not re- ported to law enforcement and those reported. The survey samples 43,000 20 U.S. households and 100,000 persons age 12 or older, and it reports on at- tempted as well as completed crimes. The NCVS does not include homicide. Robbery However, two other national sources of data about murder exist: the FBI's Rape Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) pro- 0 gram and Vital Statistics of the United 1973 1978 1983 1988 1992 States produced by the National Cen- ter for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Americans have a greater chance of The percentage of households with Information from these sources being a violent crime victim than of be- a member who had been a victim of is presented on page 3. ing injured in a motor vehicle accident. violence (other than homicide) in 1992, 5%, was the lowest recorded since What are the trends 1975, when these estimates were first How much violent crime is there in violent crime? available. in the United States? 1992 NCVS violent crime rates were For some segments of the popula- In 1992 there were 6.6 million violent unchanged from 1991 and were 9% tion, crime is not decreasing; in 1992 victimizations, including 141,000 rapes, below 1981, the peak year. The rates the violent crime rate for blacks was 1.2 million robberies, and 5.3 million declined partly because older persons, the highest ever recorded in the NCVS. assaults. who experience less violent crime than Young people age 16-24 consistently 4.9 million households, or 5% of all younger persons, comprise an increas- have the highest violent crime rates. households, had a member victimized ing proportion of the population. Trends in these age groups vary from by violence during 1992. year to year, but the overall trend has been increasing. The rate for those Violent crime rates for the youngest age groups are increasing age 12-15 was the highest ever in 1992; it was the highest ever for those Violent crime rate age 16-19 in 1991. Who are the victims of violent crime? 80 Teenage black males have the high- 16-19 est victimization rate (113 per 1,000 in 1992), while elderly white females 60 have the lowest rate (3 per 1,000). 20-24 Teenagers in general have very high 12-15 rates: 90 per 1,000 for teenage white 40 males, 55 per 1,000 for teenage white 25-34 females, and 94 per 1,000 for teenage black females. 20 How does violence affect women? More than 2.5 million women experi- ence violence annually. 0 Men have higher rates overall than 1973 1978 19831988 1992 women (40 per 1,000 for men; 25 per 1,000 for women). However, violence In 1992 the violent crime rate for black victims against males has decreased since reached the highest level ever recorded 1973, while the rates for females have remained relatively constant. Violent crime rate Women are about equally as likely to be victimized by an intimate or Black victims relative, by an acquaintance, or 40 by a stranger. Men are far more likely to be victim- ized by a stranger or acquaintance. A third of all violent victimizations of White victims women but a twentieth of all violent vic- 20 timizations of men are committed by a relative or intimate. In about 1 in 4 attacks on females, the offender used a weapon. About 0 1 in 3 of these weapons were firearms. 1973 1978 1983 1988 1992 How does violent crime affect its victims? Crime-related injuries account for accidents or receiving treatment more than 700,000 days of hospitali- for heart disease. The proportion of victimizations that zation annually the equivalent to In 1992 about 3 out of 10 victims resulted in injuries to victims increased about 30% of the hospital days for traf- who were injured did not have health 10% between 1973 and 1991. fic accident injuries and just over 1% insurance and were not eligible On average, 2.2 million crime victims of the days for treatment of heart for public medical services. are injured each year. disease. Of violent crime victims, 8% lost time Of victims of violent crime who are Hospitalized crime victims remain in from work. (All victims of crime, includ- injured, 51% require some medical the hospital for an average of 9 days, ing property crime, lost more than 6.1 attention; 19% are treated at an emer- about the same length of stay as that million days from work.) gency room and released within a day; of patients undergoing cancer treat- and 4% require hospitalization of morePage21 ment and 2 days longer than the hospi- agetrd.grf talization of those injured in traffic than one night. 10/4/93 2 Violent Crime In 1980 the homicide rate was at the highest level recorded this century For all age groups, black males age 15-24 had the highest homicide rate Homicides per 100,000 U.S. population (159 per 100,000 population). Over 68% of the murders in 1992 9 were committed with firearms According to the FBI, 23,760 murders were reported by law enforcement 6 agencies in 1992. Handguns killed 55% of the murder victims. Knives or cutting instruments were used to kill al- most 15% of the murder victims. 3 When the circumstances surrounding the murder were known, 30% resulted from the commission of another crime such as robbery, burglary, or narcotic 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1991 drug law violations. Forty percent of the murders resulted from arguments. Source: Vital Statistics of the United States, National Center for Health Statistics, Male murder victims were more likely Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services. than female victims to have been killed during the commission of a felony. Percent of Homicide was the 10th leading homicide victims cause of death for all Americans In murders where the relationship in 1991 All victims 100% between the victim and the offender Age was known, 44% of the victims were According to Vital Statistics 1-4 2% killed by an acquaintance, 22% by a For blacks of all ages, homicide was 5-14 2 stranger, and 20% by a family mem- 15-24 31 the fourth leading cause of death, but ber. The victim was the wife or girl- 25-44 47 friend of the murderer in 11% of the for black males and females age 45 or older 19 15-24, homicide was the leading cause homicides. Half of the murders by of death. Sex strangers were committed during Male 78% the commission of a felony. For whites age 15-24, homicide was Female 22 the third leading cause of death, ex- Sex and race Homicide data were reported on ceeded only by accidents and suicide. Black male 40% 25,180 offenders in 1992. Of these of- White male 36 fenders for whom sex, age, and In 1991 most homicide victims were White female 12 Black female 9 race were reported male, and most were between ages 90% were male 15 and 44. The black victims repre- Black males had the highest homi- sented almost half of all victims. cide rate (72 per 100,000 population), 50% were age 15-24 followed by black females (14 per 55% were black. 100,000), white males (9 per 100,000), and white females (3 per 100,000). What are the economic costs Violent crime victims suffered or more: about 4 in 10 robberies of of violent crime? some economic loss in 23% of the blacks compared to 2 in 10 robberies victimizations. of whites resulted in a loss of $250 or Victims of violent crime lost $1.4 Victims lost an average of $206 per more. billion in 1992 in direct costs, including violent crime in 1992. medical expenses, time lost from work, Where does violent crime occur? and activities related to the crime, such In 1992, of victims of robbery who Central cities, particularly those as going to court. had an economic loss, blacks were more likely than whites to lose $250 with populations between 250,000 Violent Crime 3 and 499,999, have the highest per cap- Nonstrangers are somewhat more The most common reasons for not ita rates of violent crime. likely than strangers to use a knife. reporting violent crimes were that the Nearly a quarter of all violent crimes Four out of five violent incidents victim viewed it as a private or person- occur either in the home (12% of all with firearms involve a handgun. al matter (22%), the offender was not violent victimizations) or at school successful (18%), or the victim felt that (12%). Thirty percent of all violent How do victims protect themselves? the police would not want to be both- crimes occur on the street or in an ered or there was lack of proof (14%).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lifetime Likelihood of Victimization
    U. S. Department of Justice I Bureau of Justice Statistics I Lifetime Likelihood of Victimization by Herbert Koppel people's perception of the meaning of BJS Analyst March 1987 annual rates with respect to their own The Bureau of Justice Statistics lives. If the Earth revolved around the This report provides estimates of the National Crime Survey provides sun in 180 days, all of our annual crime likelihood that a person will become a annual victimization rates based rates would be halved, but we would not victim of crime during his or her life- on counts of the number of crimes be safer. time, or that a household will be vic- reported and not reported to timized during a 20-year period. This police in the United States. These Calculating lifetime victimization rates contrasts with the conventional use of a rates are based on interviews 1-year period in measuring crime and twice a year with about 101,000 For this report, lifetime likelihoods criminal victimization. Most promi- persons in approximately 49,000 of victimization were calculated from nently, the National Crime Survey nationally representative NCS annual victimization rates and life (NCS) surveys a sample of U.S. house- households. Those annual rates, tables published by the National Center holds and publishes annual victimization while of obvious utility to for Health statistics.% The probability rates, and the FBI's Uniform Crime policymakers, researchers, and that a person will be victimized at a Reports (UCR) provide annual rates of statisticians, do not convey to particular age basically depends upon crimes reported to the police.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Crime Drop Youth DECEMBER 2000 URBAN INSTITUTE Justice Policy Center
    R E P O R T December 2000 URBAN INSTITUTE Justice Policy Center Jeffrey A. Butts research for safer communities Youth Crime Drop DECEMBER 2000 URBAN INSTITUTE Justice Policy Center Youth Crime Drop Summary Researchers debate why violent crime in the United States suddenly dropped in the 1990s, but one fact all researchers endorse is that the overall decline in violent crime probably had much to do with falling rates of youth crime. This brief report from the Justice Policy Center examines the recent crime drop and asks how much of the decrease seen between 1995 and 1999 can be attributed to juveniles (under age 18) and older youth (ages 18 to 24). Using the most recent data from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports, the analysis demonstrates that not only did America’s violent crime drop continue through 1999, falling youth crime accounted for most of the overall decline. The Author Jeffrey A. Butts (Ph.D., University of Michigan) is a senior research associate with the Urban Institute’s Justice Policy Center, where he is involved in research and evaluation projects on Published by policies and programs for youthful offenders, including federally funded evaluations of teen Justice Policy Center courts and juvenile drug courts. Prior to joining the Urban Institute in 1997, he was a senior URBAN INSTITUTE research associate at the National Center for Juvenile Justice. 2100 M Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20037 The Urban Institute Copyright Ó 2000 The Urban Institute is a nonprofit policy research organization established in Washington, D.C., in 1968. The Institute's goals are to sharpen thinking about society's problems and efforts to solve them, improve government decisions and their implementation, and increase citizens' Any opinions expressed are awareness about important public choices.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Crime Statistics 2019
    1 The number of the following offences increased: I. General information on police crime statistics II. Crime trends in 2019 – sexual abuse of children by 10.9 % to 13,670 cases (PCS) 1. In general (2018: 12,321 cases) 1. Importance The total number of recorded criminal offences decreased by – computer fraud (sect. 263a PC) by 12.1 % to 100,814 cases Police crime statistics serve to 2.1 % compared to the previous year (2019: 5.436m cases, 2018: (2018: 89,901 cases) 5.556m cases). The total number of recorded criminal offences – dissemination of writings depicting pornography by 51.6 % to – monitor crime and individual types of offences, the size and excluding offences against foreigners’ law decreased by 2.3 % 17,336 cases (2018: 11,435 cases) composition of the circle of suspects and fluctuations in crime compared to the previous year (2019: 5.271m cases, 2018: 5.392m 6. Offences by type as % of total offences (5,436,401 cases) rates, cases). – gather information for law enforcement purposes, for organisa- 2. Clear-up rate (CR) tional planning and decision-making and to The total clear-up rate is 57.5 %/56.2 % (2018: 57.7 %/56.5 %). The offences against theft without – carry out socio-criminological research, criminal police and other offences life aggravating CR for murder and manslaughter is particularly high at 94.0 %, as 19.7% preventive measures. 0.1% circumstances is the case with regard to crimes related to services, especially fare 18.9% 2. Content evasion 98.9 % and social benefits fraud 99.2 %.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime in New York State 2019 Final Data
    December 2020 New York State Crime Report Andrew M. Cuomo Michael C. Green Governor Executive Deputy Commissioner December 2020 Crime in New York State 2019 Final Data New York State and the FBI use seven Index crime categories as indicators of overall crime trends: murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault, which are classified as violent crimes; and the property crimes of burglary, larceny and motor vehicle theft. The FBI created these categories to allow for uniform crime reporting across all 50 states. This report details 2019 Index crime in New York State, its 62 counties and two regions: New York City and the 57 counties outside of the five boroughs (Rest of State). Police departments and sheriffs’ offices report Index crime to the Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) through the Uniform Crime Reporting and Incident-Based Reporting programs. This report also details Index crime rates per 100,000 population statewide and by county and region. DCJS uses county population data from the FBI, which is based on U.S. Census estimates, to calculate those crime rates. New York State implemented the FBI’s expanded Reported Index crime in New York State declined for the definition of rape in 2015; this resulted in an uptick seventh consecutive year in 2019, with 335,736 Index in violent crime and reported rapes in that year crimes reported. This is the fewest number of crimes when compared to prior years. As a result, caution reported since statewide reporting began in 1975. should be used when citing or interpreting any percentage changes between rapes reported in The historic low in reported Index crime has resulted in 2015 and any subsequent year, to those reported New York’s Index crime rate declining by 25.8 percent in 2014 and earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Crime in the United States
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Violent Crime in the United States ent victimization, 1973-89 'sons age 12 and older _~_ Assault Robbery Rape 1981 1985 0' 1977 1989 -- & a Itin" Criminal Victimization 1989, October 1990. - Bureau of Justice Statistics Female victims of violent crime, Law enforcement management Drugs & crime data: NCJ-127187,1/91 reports State drug resources: A national directory, Redesign of the National Crime Survey, BJS bulletins and special reports: Police departments In large cities, 1987, NCJ·122582,5/90 (Revised January 19~1) NCJ·111457,3/89 Federal drug data for national policy, NCJ· Th'il seasonality 01 crime vlcllmizallon, NCJ-119220, 8/89 Profile of state and local law enforcement 122715,4/90 Call toll·free 800·732·3277 (local 301- N CJ·l11 033, 6/88 agencies, NCJ·113949, 3/89 Drugs and crime facts, 1989, NCJ·121022, 251-5500) to order BJS reports, to be Crime and older Americans Information package, NCJ-l04569, $10, 5/87 1/90 added to one of the BJS mailing lists, Expenditure and employment or to speak to a reference specialist In Teenage victims, NCJ.l03138, 12186 Victimization and fear of crime: World Computer crime statistics at the Justice Statistics BJS bulletins: perspectives, NCJ·93872, 1/85, $9.15 Justice expenditure and employment: BJS special reports: Clearinghouse, National Criminal The Nallonal Crime Survey: Working papers, 19B8, NCJ-123132, 7190 Electronic fund transfer fraud, NCJ·96666, Justice Reference Service, Box 6000, vol. I: Current and historical perspectives, 1985, NCJ·104460, 3/87 3/85 Rockville, MD 20850.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Crime Statistics 2019
    1 The number of the following offences increased: I. General information on police crime statistics II. Crime trends in 2018 – offences against the Weapons Act by 5.5 % to 40,104 cases (PCS) 1. In general (2017: 38,001 cases) 1. Importance The total number of recorded criminal offences decreased by – drug offences by 6.1 % to 350,662 cases Police crime statistics serve to 3.6 % compared to the previous year (2018: 5.556m cases, 2017: (2017: 330,580 cases) 5.762m cases). The total number of recorded criminal offences – dissemination of writings depicting pornography by 13.6 % to – monitor crime and individual types of offences, the size and excluding offences against foreigners law decreased by 3.4 % 11,435 cases (2017: 10,066 cases) composition of the circle of suspects and fluctuations in crime compared to the previous year (2018: 5.392m cases, 2017: 5.582m 6. Offences by type as % of total offences (5,555,520 cases) rates, cases). – gather information for law enforcement purposes, for organisa- 2. Clear-up rate (CR) tional planning and decision-making and to theft without offences against other offences aggravating life 0.1% 19.5% circumstances – carry out socio-criminological research, criminal police and The total clear-up rate is 57.7 %/56.5 % (2017: 57.1 %/55.7 %). The 19.5% preventive measures. CR for murder and manslaughter is particularly high at 96.1 %, as is the case with regard to crimes related to services, especially fare offences against 2. Content evasion 99.1 % and social benefits fraud 99.2 %.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Violent Crime: the Prosecuter's Role
    Investigating Violent Crime: The Prosecuter’s Role Lessons Learned From the Field June 2018 This publication is funded through a cooperative agreement with the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this publication (including, without limitation, its content, and policies, and any services or tools provided). This project was supported by Grant No. 2016-MU-BX-K005 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the SMART Office. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Table of Contents Acknowledgments 1 Introduction 2 Initial Investigation 3 Absolute vs. Qualified Immunity 3 Vertical Prosecution 3 General 3 Examples 3 Prosecutors and the Crime Scene 4 General 4 Prosecutor Crime Scene Training for Police 6 General 6 Examples 6 Legal Advice During the Investigative Stage 6 General 6 Examples 6 Statements From Suspects – Prosecutor Involvement 6 General 6 Examples 7 Witness Cooperation and Intimidation 7 General 7 Examples 8 Confidential Informants 10 Examples
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 a Manual for Federal Prosecutors
    Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 A Manual for Federal Prosecutors December 2006 Prepared by the Staff of the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 514-3594 Frank J. Marine, Consultant Douglas E. Crow, Principal Deputy Chief Amy Chang Lee, Assistant Chief Robert C. Dalton Merv Hamburg Gregory C.J. Lisa Melissa Marquez-Oliver David J. Stander Catherine M. Weinstock Cover Design by Linda M. Baer PREFACE This manual is intended to assist federal prosecutors in the preparation and litigation of cases involving the Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1959. Prosecutors are encouraged to contact the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section (OCRS) early in the preparation of their case for advice and assistance. All pleadings alleging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959 including any indictment, information, or criminal complaint, and a prosecution memorandum must be submitted to OCRS for review and approval before being filed with the court. The submission should be approved by the prosecutor’s office before being submitted to OCRS. Due to the volume of submissions received by OCRS, prosecutors should submit the proposal three weeks prior to the date final approval is needed. Prosecutors should contact OCRS regarding the status of the proposed submission before finally scheduling arrests or other time-sensitive actions relating to the submission. Moreover, prosecutors should refrain from finalizing any guilty plea agreement containing a Section 1959 charge until final approval has been obtained from OCRS. The policies and procedures set forth in this manual and elsewhere relating to 18 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Crime Hotspots in Chicago Using Bayesian Statistics
    Examining Crime Hotspots in Chicago Using Bayesian Statistics Abstract Chicago currently leads the United States with the greatest number of homicides and violent crimes in recent years. Using police data from the City of Chicago’s Data Portal, we examined crime hot spots in Chicago and whether crime rates differ by geographic and demographic information. In general, we found that crime rate in Chicago has decreased between 2010 and 2015, though the rates differed between violent and non-violent crimes. Change in crime rate also varied geographically. We found that for areas with lower white populations, crime decreased as income rose. For areas with larger non-white populations, crime rate increased as income increased 1 1 Introduction Chicago currently leads the United States with the greatest number of homicides and violent crimes in recent years. In 2016, the number of homicides in Chicago increased 58% from the year before (Ford, 2017). Using police data from the City of Chicago’s Data Portal, we examined crime hot spots in Chicago and whether crime rates differ by geographic and demographic information. In this report, we defined hot spots as zipcodes with greater increases, or smaller decreases, in crime rates over time relative to other zipcodes in Chicago. In addition, we examined hot spots for both violent and non-violent crimes. Understanding crime hot spots can prove advantageous to law enforcement as they can better understand crime trends and create crime management strategies accordingly (Law, et al. 2014). A common approach to defining crime hot spots uses crime density. Thus, hot spots by this definition are areas with high crime rates that are also surrounded by other high-crime areas for one time period.
    [Show full text]
  • GUN VIOLENCE in CHICAGO, 2016 GUN VIOLENCE in CHICAGO, 2016 January 2017 University of Chicago Crime Lab1
    GUN VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO, 2016 GUN VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO, 2016 January 2017 University of Chicago Crime Lab1 Acknowledgments: The University of Chicago Crime Lab is a privately-funded, independent, non-partisan academic research center founded in 2008 to help cities identify the most effective and humane ways to control crime and violence, and reduce the harms associated with the administration of criminal justice. We are grateful to the Chicago Police Department for making available the data upon which this report is based, to Ben Hansen for help assembling data on Chicago weather patterns, and to Aaron Chalfin, Philip Cook, Aurélie Ouss, Harold Pollack, and Shari Runner for valuable comments. We thank the Joyce Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the McCormick Foundation, and the Pritzker Foundation for support of the University of Chicago Crime Lab and Urban Labs, as well as Susan and Tom Dunn, and Ira Handler. All opinions and any errors are our own and do not necessarily reflect those of our funders or of any government agencies. 1 This report was produced by Max Kapustin, Jens Ludwig, Marc Punkay, Kimberley Smith, Lauren Speigel, and David Welgus, with the invaluable assistance of Roseanna Ander, Nathan Hess, and Julia Quinn. Please direct any comments and questions to [email protected]. 2 INTRODUCTION A total of 764 people were murdered in Chicago in 2016. They were sons, brothers, and fathers; sisters, daughters, and mothers; they were, as the title of The New York Times reporter Fox Butterfield’s book on urban violence noted,All God’s Children.
    [Show full text]
  • Talking Helps: Information for Victims of Sexual Assault
    Talking Helps: Information for Victims of Sexual Assault Sexual assaults are serious, violent and frightening crimes directed against women, men and children. According to Montana Law, sexual assault occurs when a person knowingly subjects another person to any sexual contact without consent. Sexual assaults disrupt the lives of many people, not only victims but also those who fear becoming victims. Sexual assault creates psychological trauma for victims and those around them, and often limits women's mobility and therefore their freedom. All must share the concern for this crime and efforts to eliminate it. FACTS ABOUT SEXUAL ASSAULT Facts about sexual assault often have not been accurately reported in our society. Most people have grown up with a variety of false beliefs about sexual assault. These beliefs have been handed down from generation to generation through individual interaction, media (movies, TV, magazines and books), religious beliefs and through a lack of education on the subject. It has only been in the last ten years that people started studying sexual assault and finding that most ideas about sexual assault that have existed for centuries are wrong. These false beliefs have many negative effects on the victim in particular. Many sexual assault victims feel shame and guilt because of society's false beliefs and, as a result, only 1/5 to 1/10 seek the help they need or tell anyone what has happened. These false beliefs also result in low conviction rates of offenders. And finally, these false ideas contribute to sexual assault in our society by not recognizing the offender as responsible for his or her behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Protesters, Extortion, and Coercion: Preventing RICO from Chilling First Amendment Freedoms Brian J
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 75 | Issue 2 Article 6 12-1-1999 Protesters, Extortion, and Coercion: Preventing RICO from Chilling First Amendment Freedoms Brian J. Murray Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Recommended Citation Brian J. Murray, Protesters, Extortion, and Coercion: Preventing RICO from Chilling First Amendment Freedoms, 75 Notre Dame L. Rev. 691 (1999). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol75/iss2/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTE PROTESTERS, EXTORTION, AND COERCION: PREVENTING RICO FROM CHILLING FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOMS Brian j Murray* The claim that the expressions were intended to exercise a coercive im- pact... does not remove them from the reach of the First Amendment.1 [N]o one really knows a law thoroughly unless he knows what the courts 2 have made of it. I. INTRODUCTION In the tradition of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Americans who disagree with the practices of others have a Constitutional right to protest. Through such protest they can attempt, with zeal, to per- suade those who engage in such practices to change their ways. Under the jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court such protest activity does not fall outside of the protection of the First Amendment "simply because it may embarrass others or coerce them into action."3 * Candidate forJuris Doctor, Notre Dame Law School, 2000; B.S., University of Notre Dame, 1997.
    [Show full text]