DOCSLIB.ORG

LMPD UCR Report January - April 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LMPD UCR Report January - April 2021 LMPD UCR Report January - April 2021 Homicide Data Provided by the LMPD Homicide Unit The information contained in this report includes figures extracted from LMPD’s Records Management System (RMS) and is calculated by the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Standards (UCR). This information will not match any figures published within the FBI’s Semi-Annual and Annual Crime in the United States Report. Figures within the FBI’s Crime in the United States Report are static figures calculated at one point in time while figures within this report, are obtained from the live RMS system and include any updates to reports not reflected within the published Crime in the United States Reports. All data provided reflects solely incident reports taken within the jurisdiction of Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD) and does not include statistics from other cities within Jefferson County, Kentucky unless the incident report was taken by an LMPD official and is chronicled in LMPD’s Records Management System. 1 of 44 ACS/ 5/11/2021 Table of Contents Crime Categories 3 Preliminary LMPD UCR Annual Comparison 3 Preliminary LMPD YTD UCR Annual Comparison 4 UCR Part I Crime Stats 5 Preliminary UCR Part I Comparison 6 Violent and Property Crime Comparison YTD 7 UCR Violent Crime Stats and Comparison 8 Preliminary UCR Violent Crime Comparison YTD by Division 9 UCR Property Crime Stats and Comparison 10 Preliminary UCR Property Crime Comparison 11 Homicide Comparison and Stats 12 Homicide Demographics and Homicides by Firearm 13 YTD Homicides by Division 14 YTD Homicide Victim Demographics 15 YTD Homicide Victim and Offender Analysis 16 Rape Comparison and Stats 17 Rape Victim and Offender Analysis 18 Robbery Comparison and Stats 19 Robbery Victim and Offender Analysis 20 Aggravated Assault Comparison and Stats 21 Aggravated Assault Victim and Offender Analysis 22 Burglary Comparison and Stats 23 Larceny Comparison and Stats 24 Auto Theft Comparison and Stats 25 Crime by Division 26 1st division Preliminary LMPD YTD UCR Annual Comparison 26 Preliminary UCR Crime 1st Division 27 2nd division Preliminary LMPD YTD UCR Annual Comparison 28 Preliminary UCR Crime 2nd Division 29 3rd division Preliminary LMPD YTD UCR Annual Comparison 30 Preliminary UCR Crime 3rd Division 31 4th division Preliminary LMPD YTD UCR Annual Comparison 32 Preliminary UCR Crime 4th Division 33 5th division Preliminary LMPD YTD UCR Annual Comparison 34 Preliminary UCR Crime 5th Division 35 6th division Preliminary LMPD YTD UCR Annual Comparison 36 Preliminary UCR Crime 6th Division 37 7th division Preliminary LMPD YTD UCR Annual Comparison 38 Preliminary UCR Crime 7th Division 39 8th division Preliminary LMPD YTD UCR Annual Comparison 40 Preliminary UCR Crime 8th Division 41 Small Cities & CAL Preliminary LMPD YTD UCR Annual Comparison 42 Criminal Offense Definitions 43 2 of 44 ACS/ 5/11/2021 Preliminary LMPD YTD UCR Annual Comparison January - April January - April January -April January -April January - April January - April January - April Violent Crime 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 1st Division 256 250 162 178 334 355 2nd Division 345 322 287 303 349 538 3rd Division 171 219 239 208 235 301 4th Division 318 314 287 305 336 500 5th Division 51 52 61 53 46 67 6th Division 135 145 158 116 188 266 7th Division 109 101 98 103 140 172 8th Division 57 59 69 52 44 49 Other 13 21 21 23 27 33 Total: 1455 1483 1382 1341 1699 2281 January - April January -April January -April January - April January - April January - April Property Crime 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 1st Division 1088 959 847 876 855 651 2nd Division 804 801 679 629 757 603 3rd Division 1787 1623 1584 1413 1303 1276 4th Division 1418 1388 1402 1430 1311 1235 5th Division 713 712 671 530 557 537 6th Division 1112 1190 1047 970 929 1020 7th Division 1443 1380 1203 1289 1056 1090 8th Division 833 856 713 813 738 725 Other 37 26 33 27 31 25 Total: 9235 8935 8179 7977 7537 7162 January - April January -April January -April January - April January - April January - April Part I Crime 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 1st Division 1344 1209 1009 1054 1189 1006 2nd Division 1149 1123 966 932 1106 1141 3rd Division 1958 1842 1823 1621 1538 1577 4th Division 1736 1702 1689 1735 1647 1735 5th Division 764 764 732 583 603 604 6th Division 1247 1335 1205 1086 1117 1286 7th Division 1552 1481 1301 1392 1196 1262 8th Division 890 915 782 865 782 774 Other 50 47 54 50 58 58 Total: 10690 10418 9561 9318 9236 9443 The information contained in this report includes figures extracted from LMPD’s Records Management System (RMS) and is calculated by the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Standards (UCR). This information will not match any figures published within the FBI’s Semi-Annual and Annual Crime in the United States Report. Figures within the FBI’s Crime in the United States Report are static figures calculated at one point in time while figures within this report, are obtained from the live RMS system and include any updates to reports not reflected within the published Crime in the United States Reports. All data provided reflects solely incident reports taken within the jurisdiction of Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD) and does not include statistics from other cities within Jefferson County, Kentucky unless the incident report was taken by an LMPD official and is chronicled in LMPD’s Records Management System. 3 of 44 ACS/ 5/11/2021 Preliminary LMPD YTD UCR Annual Comparison January - April 5 Year YTD Crime Rate Totals Motor Violent Aggravated Property Vehicle Part I Population % Year Crime Murder* Rape Robbery Assault Crime Burglary Larceny Theft Crime Population Change January - April 2016 1,455 36 72 462 885 9,235 1,838 6,161 1,236 10,690 677,710 -- January - April 2017 1,483 38 67 424 954 8,935 1,846 5,887 1,202 10,418 680,550 0.42% January - April 2018 1,382 28 80 331 943 8,179 1,432 5,572 1,175 9,561 683,325 0.41% January - April 2019 1,341 23 79 284 955 7,977 1,326 5,443 1,208 9,318 684,362 0.15% January - April 2020 1,699 34 76 319 1,270 7,537 1,277 5,088 1,172 9,236 684,362 0.00% January - April 2021 2,281 58 83 393 1,747 7,162 1,266 4,529 1,367 9,443 766,757 Projected Pop. Change Yearly Percent Change Crime Rate Motor Violent Aggravated Property Vehicle Part I Year Crime Murder* Rape Robbery Assault Crime Burglary Larceny Theft Crime Percentage 2016 vs 2017 1.92% 5.56% -6.94% -8.23% 7.80% -3.25% 0.44% -4.45% -2.75% -2.54% Percentage 2017 vs 2018 -6.81% -26.32% 19.40% -21.93% -1.15% -8.46% -22.43% -5.35% -2.25% -8.23% 0.28% Percentage 2018 vs 2019 -2.97% -17.86% -1.25% -14.20% 1.27% -2.47% -7.40% -2.32% 2.81% -2.54% 0.28% Percentage 2019 vs 2020 26.70% 47.83% -3.80% 12.32% 32.98% -5.52% -3.70% -6.52% -2.98% -0.88% Percentage 2020 vs 2021 34.26% 70.59% 9.21% 23.20% 37.56% -4.98% -0.86% -10.99% 16.64% 2.24% YTD Crime Rate per 100,000 Motor Violent Aggravated Property Vehicle Part I Year Crime Murder* Rape Robbery Assault Crime Burglary Larceny Theft Crime January - April 2016 214.69 5.31 10.62 68.17 130.59 1,362.68 271.21 909.09 182.38 1,577.37 January - April 2017 217.91 5.58 9.84 62.30 140.18 1,312.91 271.25 865.04 176.62 1,530.82 January - April 2018 202.25 4.10 11.71 48.44 138.00 1,196.94 209.56 815.42 171.95 1,399.19 January - April 2019 195.95 3.36 11.54 41.50 139.55 1,165.61 193.76 795.34 176.51 1,361.56 January - April 2020 248.26 4.97 11.11 46.61 185.57 1,101.32 186.60 743.47 171.25 1,349.58 January - April 2021 297.49 7.56 10.82 51.25 227.84 934.06 165.11 590.67 178.28 1,231.55 Percentage 2016 vs 2017 1.50% 5.12% -7.33% -8.61% 7.35% -3.65% 0.02% -4.85% -3.16% -2.95% Percentage 2017 vs 2018 -7.19% -26.62% 18.92% -22.25% -1.55% -8.83% -22.74% -5.74% -2.64% -8.60% Percentage 2018 vs 2019 -3.11% -17.98% -1.40% -14.33% 1.12% -2.62% -7.54% -2.46% 2.65% -2.69% Percentage 2019 vs 2020 26.70% 47.83% -3.80% 12.32% 32.98% -5.52% -3.70% -6.52% -2.98% -0.88% Percentage 2020 vs 2021 19.83% 52.26% -2.53% 9.96% 22.78% -15.19% -11.51% -20.55% 4.10% -8.75% The information contained in this report includes figures extracted from LMPD’s Records Management System (RMS) and is calculated by the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Standards (UCR). This information will not match any figures published within the FBI’s Semi-Annual and Annual Crime in the United States Report. Figures within the FBI’s Crime in the United States Report are static figures calculated at one point in time while figures within this report, are obtained from the live RMS system and include any updates to reports not reflected within the published Crime in the United States Reports.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lifetime Likelihood of Victimization
    U. S. Department of Justice I Bureau of Justice Statistics I Lifetime Likelihood of Victimization by Herbert Koppel people's perception of the meaning of BJS Analyst March 1987 annual rates with respect to their own The Bureau of Justice Statistics lives. If the Earth revolved around the This report provides estimates of the National Crime Survey provides sun in 180 days, all of our annual crime likelihood that a person will become a annual victimization rates based rates would be halved, but we would not victim of crime during his or her life- on counts of the number of crimes be safer. time, or that a household will be vic- reported and not reported to timized during a 20-year period. This police in the United States. These Calculating lifetime victimization rates contrasts with the conventional use of a rates are based on interviews 1-year period in measuring crime and twice a year with about 101,000 For this report, lifetime likelihoods criminal victimization. Most promi- persons in approximately 49,000 of victimization were calculated from nently, the National Crime Survey nationally representative NCS annual victimization rates and life (NCS) surveys a sample of U.S. house- households. Those annual rates, tables published by the National Center holds and publishes annual victimization while of obvious utility to for Health statistics.% The probability rates, and the FBI's Uniform Crime policymakers, researchers, and that a person will be victimized at a Reports (UCR) provide annual rates of statisticians, do not convey to particular age basically depends upon crimes reported to the police.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Crime Drop Youth DECEMBER 2000 URBAN INSTITUTE Justice Policy Center
    R E P O R T December 2000 URBAN INSTITUTE Justice Policy Center Jeffrey A. Butts research for safer communities Youth Crime Drop DECEMBER 2000 URBAN INSTITUTE Justice Policy Center Youth Crime Drop Summary Researchers debate why violent crime in the United States suddenly dropped in the 1990s, but one fact all researchers endorse is that the overall decline in violent crime probably had much to do with falling rates of youth crime. This brief report from the Justice Policy Center examines the recent crime drop and asks how much of the decrease seen between 1995 and 1999 can be attributed to juveniles (under age 18) and older youth (ages 18 to 24). Using the most recent data from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports, the analysis demonstrates that not only did America’s violent crime drop continue through 1999, falling youth crime accounted for most of the overall decline. The Author Jeffrey A. Butts (Ph.D., University of Michigan) is a senior research associate with the Urban Institute’s Justice Policy Center, where he is involved in research and evaluation projects on Published by policies and programs for youthful offenders, including federally funded evaluations of teen Justice Policy Center courts and juvenile drug courts. Prior to joining the Urban Institute in 1997, he was a senior URBAN INSTITUTE research associate at the National Center for Juvenile Justice. 2100 M Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20037 The Urban Institute Copyright Ó 2000 The Urban Institute is a nonprofit policy research organization established in Washington, D.C., in 1968. The Institute's goals are to sharpen thinking about society's problems and efforts to solve them, improve government decisions and their implementation, and increase citizens' Any opinions expressed are awareness about important public choices.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Crime Statistics 2019
    1 The number of the following offences increased: I. General information on police crime statistics II. Crime trends in 2019 – sexual abuse of children by 10.9 % to 13,670 cases (PCS) 1. In general (2018: 12,321 cases) 1. Importance The total number of recorded criminal offences decreased by – computer fraud (sect. 263a PC) by 12.1 % to 100,814 cases Police crime statistics serve to 2.1 % compared to the previous year (2019: 5.436m cases, 2018: (2018: 89,901 cases) 5.556m cases). The total number of recorded criminal offences – dissemination of writings depicting pornography by 51.6 % to – monitor crime and individual types of offences, the size and excluding offences against foreigners’ law decreased by 2.3 % 17,336 cases (2018: 11,435 cases) composition of the circle of suspects and fluctuations in crime compared to the previous year (2019: 5.271m cases, 2018: 5.392m 6. Offences by type as % of total offences (5,436,401 cases) rates, cases). – gather information for law enforcement purposes, for organisa- 2. Clear-up rate (CR) tional planning and decision-making and to The total clear-up rate is 57.5 %/56.2 % (2018: 57.7 %/56.5 %). The offences against theft without – carry out socio-criminological research, criminal police and other offences life aggravating CR for murder and manslaughter is particularly high at 94.0 %, as 19.7% preventive measures. 0.1% circumstances is the case with regard to crimes related to services, especially fare 18.9% 2. Content evasion 98.9 % and social benefits fraud 99.2 %.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime in New York State 2019 Final Data
    December 2020 New York State Crime Report Andrew M. Cuomo Michael C. Green Governor Executive Deputy Commissioner December 2020 Crime in New York State 2019 Final Data New York State and the FBI use seven Index crime categories as indicators of overall crime trends: murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault, which are classified as violent crimes; and the property crimes of burglary, larceny and motor vehicle theft. The FBI created these categories to allow for uniform crime reporting across all 50 states. This report details 2019 Index crime in New York State, its 62 counties and two regions: New York City and the 57 counties outside of the five boroughs (Rest of State). Police departments and sheriffs’ offices report Index crime to the Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) through the Uniform Crime Reporting and Incident-Based Reporting programs. This report also details Index crime rates per 100,000 population statewide and by county and region. DCJS uses county population data from the FBI, which is based on U.S. Census estimates, to calculate those crime rates. New York State implemented the FBI’s expanded Reported Index crime in New York State declined for the definition of rape in 2015; this resulted in an uptick seventh consecutive year in 2019, with 335,736 Index in violent crime and reported rapes in that year crimes reported. This is the fewest number of crimes when compared to prior years. As a result, caution reported since statewide reporting began in 1975. should be used when citing or interpreting any percentage changes between rapes reported in The historic low in reported Index crime has resulted in 2015 and any subsequent year, to those reported New York’s Index crime rate declining by 25.8 percent in 2014 and earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Crime in the United States
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Violent Crime in the United States ent victimization, 1973-89 'sons age 12 and older _~_ Assault Robbery Rape 1981 1985 0' 1977 1989 -- & a Itin" Criminal Victimization 1989, October 1990. - Bureau of Justice Statistics Female victims of violent crime, Law enforcement management Drugs & crime data: NCJ-127187,1/91 reports State drug resources: A national directory, Redesign of the National Crime Survey, BJS bulletins and special reports: Police departments In large cities, 1987, NCJ·122582,5/90 (Revised January 19~1) NCJ·111457,3/89 Federal drug data for national policy, NCJ· Th'il seasonality 01 crime vlcllmizallon, NCJ-119220, 8/89 Profile of state and local law enforcement 122715,4/90 Call toll·free 800·732·3277 (local 301- N CJ·l11 033, 6/88 agencies, NCJ·113949, 3/89 Drugs and crime facts, 1989, NCJ·121022, 251-5500) to order BJS reports, to be Crime and older Americans Information package, NCJ-l04569, $10, 5/87 1/90 added to one of the BJS mailing lists, Expenditure and employment or to speak to a reference specialist In Teenage victims, NCJ.l03138, 12186 Victimization and fear of crime: World Computer crime statistics at the Justice Statistics BJS bulletins: perspectives, NCJ·93872, 1/85, $9.15 Justice expenditure and employment: BJS special reports: Clearinghouse, National Criminal The Nallonal Crime Survey: Working papers, 19B8, NCJ-123132, 7190 Electronic fund transfer fraud, NCJ·96666, Justice Reference Service, Box 6000, vol. I: Current and historical perspectives, 1985, NCJ·104460, 3/87 3/85 Rockville, MD 20850.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Crime Statistics 2019
    1 The number of the following offences increased: I. General information on police crime statistics II. Crime trends in 2018 – offences against the Weapons Act by 5.5 % to 40,104 cases (PCS) 1. In general (2017: 38,001 cases) 1. Importance The total number of recorded criminal offences decreased by – drug offences by 6.1 % to 350,662 cases Police crime statistics serve to 3.6 % compared to the previous year (2018: 5.556m cases, 2017: (2017: 330,580 cases) 5.762m cases). The total number of recorded criminal offences – dissemination of writings depicting pornography by 13.6 % to – monitor crime and individual types of offences, the size and excluding offences against foreigners law decreased by 3.4 % 11,435 cases (2017: 10,066 cases) composition of the circle of suspects and fluctuations in crime compared to the previous year (2018: 5.392m cases, 2017: 5.582m 6. Offences by type as % of total offences (5,555,520 cases) rates, cases). – gather information for law enforcement purposes, for organisa- 2. Clear-up rate (CR) tional planning and decision-making and to theft without offences against other offences aggravating life 0.1% 19.5% circumstances – carry out socio-criminological research, criminal police and The total clear-up rate is 57.7 %/56.5 % (2017: 57.1 %/55.7 %). The 19.5% preventive measures. CR for murder and manslaughter is particularly high at 96.1 %, as is the case with regard to crimes related to services, especially fare offences against 2. Content evasion 99.1 % and social benefits fraud 99.2 %.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Violent Crime: the Prosecuter's Role
    Investigating Violent Crime: The Prosecuter’s Role Lessons Learned From the Field June 2018 This publication is funded through a cooperative agreement with the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this publication (including, without limitation, its content, and policies, and any services or tools provided). This project was supported by Grant No. 2016-MU-BX-K005 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the SMART Office. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Table of Contents Acknowledgments 1 Introduction 2 Initial Investigation 3 Absolute vs. Qualified Immunity 3 Vertical Prosecution 3 General 3 Examples 3 Prosecutors and the Crime Scene 4 General 4 Prosecutor Crime Scene Training for Police 6 General 6 Examples 6 Legal Advice During the Investigative Stage 6 General 6 Examples 6 Statements From Suspects – Prosecutor Involvement 6 General 6 Examples 7 Witness Cooperation and Intimidation 7 General 7 Examples 8 Confidential Informants 10 Examples
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 a Manual for Federal Prosecutors
    Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 A Manual for Federal Prosecutors December 2006 Prepared by the Staff of the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 514-3594 Frank J. Marine, Consultant Douglas E. Crow, Principal Deputy Chief Amy Chang Lee, Assistant Chief Robert C. Dalton Merv Hamburg Gregory C.J. Lisa Melissa Marquez-Oliver David J. Stander Catherine M. Weinstock Cover Design by Linda M. Baer PREFACE This manual is intended to assist federal prosecutors in the preparation and litigation of cases involving the Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1959. Prosecutors are encouraged to contact the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section (OCRS) early in the preparation of their case for advice and assistance. All pleadings alleging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959 including any indictment, information, or criminal complaint, and a prosecution memorandum must be submitted to OCRS for review and approval before being filed with the court. The submission should be approved by the prosecutor’s office before being submitted to OCRS. Due to the volume of submissions received by OCRS, prosecutors should submit the proposal three weeks prior to the date final approval is needed. Prosecutors should contact OCRS regarding the status of the proposed submission before finally scheduling arrests or other time-sensitive actions relating to the submission. Moreover, prosecutors should refrain from finalizing any guilty plea agreement containing a Section 1959 charge until final approval has been obtained from OCRS. The policies and procedures set forth in this manual and elsewhere relating to 18 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Crime Hotspots in Chicago Using Bayesian Statistics
    Examining Crime Hotspots in Chicago Using Bayesian Statistics Abstract Chicago currently leads the United States with the greatest number of homicides and violent crimes in recent years. Using police data from the City of Chicago’s Data Portal, we examined crime hot spots in Chicago and whether crime rates differ by geographic and demographic information. In general, we found that crime rate in Chicago has decreased between 2010 and 2015, though the rates differed between violent and non-violent crimes. Change in crime rate also varied geographically. We found that for areas with lower white populations, crime decreased as income rose. For areas with larger non-white populations, crime rate increased as income increased 1 1 Introduction Chicago currently leads the United States with the greatest number of homicides and violent crimes in recent years. In 2016, the number of homicides in Chicago increased 58% from the year before (Ford, 2017). Using police data from the City of Chicago’s Data Portal, we examined crime hot spots in Chicago and whether crime rates differ by geographic and demographic information. In this report, we defined hot spots as zipcodes with greater increases, or smaller decreases, in crime rates over time relative to other zipcodes in Chicago. In addition, we examined hot spots for both violent and non-violent crimes. Understanding crime hot spots can prove advantageous to law enforcement as they can better understand crime trends and create crime management strategies accordingly (Law, et al. 2014). A common approach to defining crime hot spots uses crime density. Thus, hot spots by this definition are areas with high crime rates that are also surrounded by other high-crime areas for one time period.
    [Show full text]
  • GUN VIOLENCE in CHICAGO, 2016 GUN VIOLENCE in CHICAGO, 2016 January 2017 University of Chicago Crime Lab1
    GUN VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO, 2016 GUN VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO, 2016 January 2017 University of Chicago Crime Lab1 Acknowledgments: The University of Chicago Crime Lab is a privately-funded, independent, non-partisan academic research center founded in 2008 to help cities identify the most effective and humane ways to control crime and violence, and reduce the harms associated with the administration of criminal justice. We are grateful to the Chicago Police Department for making available the data upon which this report is based, to Ben Hansen for help assembling data on Chicago weather patterns, and to Aaron Chalfin, Philip Cook, Aurélie Ouss, Harold Pollack, and Shari Runner for valuable comments. We thank the Joyce Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the McCormick Foundation, and the Pritzker Foundation for support of the University of Chicago Crime Lab and Urban Labs, as well as Susan and Tom Dunn, and Ira Handler. All opinions and any errors are our own and do not necessarily reflect those of our funders or of any government agencies. 1 This report was produced by Max Kapustin, Jens Ludwig, Marc Punkay, Kimberley Smith, Lauren Speigel, and David Welgus, with the invaluable assistance of Roseanna Ander, Nathan Hess, and Julia Quinn. Please direct any comments and questions to [email protected]. 2 INTRODUCTION A total of 764 people were murdered in Chicago in 2016. They were sons, brothers, and fathers; sisters, daughters, and mothers; they were, as the title of The New York Times reporter Fox Butterfield’s book on urban violence noted,All God’s Children.
    [Show full text]
  • Talking Helps: Information for Victims of Sexual Assault
    Talking Helps: Information for Victims of Sexual Assault Sexual assaults are serious, violent and frightening crimes directed against women, men and children. According to Montana Law, sexual assault occurs when a person knowingly subjects another person to any sexual contact without consent. Sexual assaults disrupt the lives of many people, not only victims but also those who fear becoming victims. Sexual assault creates psychological trauma for victims and those around them, and often limits women's mobility and therefore their freedom. All must share the concern for this crime and efforts to eliminate it. FACTS ABOUT SEXUAL ASSAULT Facts about sexual assault often have not been accurately reported in our society. Most people have grown up with a variety of false beliefs about sexual assault. These beliefs have been handed down from generation to generation through individual interaction, media (movies, TV, magazines and books), religious beliefs and through a lack of education on the subject. It has only been in the last ten years that people started studying sexual assault and finding that most ideas about sexual assault that have existed for centuries are wrong. These false beliefs have many negative effects on the victim in particular. Many sexual assault victims feel shame and guilt because of society's false beliefs and, as a result, only 1/5 to 1/10 seek the help they need or tell anyone what has happened. These false beliefs also result in low conviction rates of offenders. And finally, these false ideas contribute to sexual assault in our society by not recognizing the offender as responsible for his or her behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Protesters, Extortion, and Coercion: Preventing RICO from Chilling First Amendment Freedoms Brian J
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 75 | Issue 2 Article 6 12-1-1999 Protesters, Extortion, and Coercion: Preventing RICO from Chilling First Amendment Freedoms Brian J. Murray Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Recommended Citation Brian J. Murray, Protesters, Extortion, and Coercion: Preventing RICO from Chilling First Amendment Freedoms, 75 Notre Dame L. Rev. 691 (1999). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol75/iss2/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTE PROTESTERS, EXTORTION, AND COERCION: PREVENTING RICO FROM CHILLING FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOMS Brian j Murray* The claim that the expressions were intended to exercise a coercive im- pact... does not remove them from the reach of the First Amendment.1 [N]o one really knows a law thoroughly unless he knows what the courts 2 have made of it. I. INTRODUCTION In the tradition of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Americans who disagree with the practices of others have a Constitutional right to protest. Through such protest they can attempt, with zeal, to per- suade those who engage in such practices to change their ways. Under the jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court such protest activity does not fall outside of the protection of the First Amendment "simply because it may embarrass others or coerce them into action."3 * Candidate forJuris Doctor, Notre Dame Law School, 2000; B.S., University of Notre Dame, 1997.
    [Show full text]