DOCSLIB.ORG

York Region Transit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
York Region Transit The Importance of Service Frequency to Attracting Ridership: The Cases of Brampton and York Jonathan English Columbia University CUTA Conference May 2016 Introduction • Is density the most important determinant of transit system success? • Can transit be successful in areas with relatively low density and a suburban built form? • Do service increases and reductions affect ridership? • The goal is to find natural experiments that can answer these questions The Region Source: Wikimedia The Comparison York Region Transit Brampton Transit • Focused expansion on • Developed grid network major corridors, of high-service bus including pioneering routes Viva BRT • Tailored service to demand on secondary corridors High Frequency Routes York Brampton Green = 20 Min Max Headway to Midnight, Mon to Sat (to 10pm on Sun) Grey = 20 Min Max Headway to Midnight, Mon to Sat (to 10pm on Sun) Source: Public Schedules and Google Earth Principal Findings • Increased service improves ridership performance • “Network effect” means that comprehensive network of high-service routes, rather than focus on select corridors, produces largest ridership gains • Well-designed service improvements can be undertaken while maintaining stable fare recovery Brampton vs York Service 1.8 1.6 1.4 /Capita 1.2 1 0.8 Kilometres 0.6 0.4 Vehicle 0.2 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 York Brampton Source: CUTA Fact Book Brampton vs York Ridership 40 35 Brampton: +57.7% 30 25 20 15 Riders/Capita 10 York: +29.7% 5 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Brampton York Source: CUTA Fact Book Brampton Ridership vs Service 40 1.8 1.7 35 1.6 30 1.5 1.4 25 1.3 Riders/Capita 1.2 Vehicle Hours/Capita 20 1.1 15 1 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Ridership/Capita Vehicle Hours/Capita Source: CUTA Fact Book YRT Ridership vs Service 25 1.2 1.1 20 1 15 0.9 0.8 10 0.7 Riders/Capita *Figures affected in 2008 by strike and in 2011- 0.6 Vehicle Hours/Capita 5 2012 by strike and subsequent two months of free fares 0.5 0 0.4 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Ridership/Capita Vehicle Hours/Capita Source: CUTA Fact Book Brampton Fare Recovery Ratio 60% 1.8 1.6 50% 1.4 40% 1.2 1 30% 0.8 20% 0.6 0.4 Vehicle Hours/Capita 10% 0.2 Operating Revas %ofOperatingCost 0% 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Recovery Ratio Vehicle Hours/Capita Source: CUTA Fact Book YRT Fare Recovery Ratio 50% 1.2 45% 1 40% 35% 0.8 30% 25% 0.6 20% 0.4 15% 10% *Figures affected in 2008 by strike and in 2011- Vehicle Hours/Capita 0.2 2012 by strike and subsequent two months of free 5% fares Operating Revas %ofOperatingCost 0% 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Recovery Ratio Vehicle Hours/Capita Source: CUTA Fact Book Effect on Individual Routes • The following slides will explore the effect of the service changes on a sample of individual routes • They have been selected for their comparability • The data sources are 2005 and 2016 timetables of York Region Transit and Brampton Transit • Highway 7 BRT and local routes in both Brampton and York • Both major commercial arteries surrounded by single-family residences, serving major employment areas • Comparison made with busier eastern section in York YRT Viva Purple & Pink and Rt 1 Brampton Züm Queen and Rt 1 Source: Google Earth Source: Google Earth 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 YRT Viva Purple & Pink and Rt 1 EB at Highway 7 & Leslie, 2016 Brampton Züm Queen and Rt 1 EB at Highway 7 & Kennedy, 2016 Weekday Service Comparison, 2016 Trips per hour YRT Day Total: 149, Brampton Day Total: 201 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 YRT Rt 1 EB at Highway 7 & Leslie, 2005 YRT Viva Purple & Pink and Rt 1 EB at Highway 7 & Leslie, 2016 YRT 2005 vs2016 Service Comparison Weekday trips per hour Pre- and Post-Viva BRT; 2005 Day Total: 55, 2016 Day Total: 149 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Brampton Rt 1 EB at Highway 7 & Kennedy, 2005 Brampton Züm Queen and Rt 1 EB at Highway 7 & Kennedy, 2016 Brampton 2005 vs2016 Service Comparison Weekday trips per hour Pre- and Post- Züm BRT; 2005 Day Total: 106, 2016 Day Total: 201 • Two typical secondary routes serving single-family residential areas YRT Route 7 Martin Grove Brampton Route 50 Gore Road Source: Google Earth Source: Google Earth 0 1 2 3 4 5 4:00 5:00 6:00 YRT Rt 7 Northbound from Martin Grove & Highway 7 2016 Brampton Rt 50 Northbound from The Gore and Queen (Highway 7) 2016 7:00 Weekday Service Comparison, 2016 Comparison, Service Weekday 8:00 YRT Day Day YRT 9:00 10:00 11:00 Total: Total: 12:00 Trips per hour per Trips 27, Brampton Day Day Brampton 27, 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 Total: 55 Total: 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 0 1 2 3 4 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 YRT 2005 2005 YRT YRT Rt 7 Northbound from Martin Grove & Highway 7 2016 YRT Rt 7 Northbound from Martin Grove & Highway 7 2005 8:00 9:00 2005 Day Total: Total: 2005 Day 10:00 11:00 vs Weekday trips per hour per trips Weekday 12:00 2016 Service Comparison Service 2016 13:00 31, 14:00 2016 Day Total: Total: 2016 Day 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 27 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 0 1 2 3 4 5 4:00 5:00 Brampton 2005 2005 Brampton 6:00 Brampton Rt 50 Northbound from The Gore and Queen (Highway 7) 2016 Brampton Rt 50 Northbound from The Gore and Queen (Highway 7) 2005 7:00 8:00 9:00 2005 Day Total: 8, 2016 Day Total: 55 Total: 2016 Day 8, Total: 2005 Day 10:00 11:00 Weekday trips per hour per trips Weekday 12:00 vs 13:00 2016 Service Comparison Service 2016 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 0 1 2 3 4:00 5:00 6:00 YRT Rt 7 Northbound from Martin Grove & Highway 7 2016 Brampton Rt 50 Northbound from The Gore and Queen (Highway 7) 2016 7:00 Saturday Service Comparison, 2016 Comparison, Service Saturday 8:00 Brampton Day Total: Total: Day Brampton 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 Trips per hour per Trips 13:00 14:00 33, 15:00 YRT Day Total: Total: Day YRT 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 18 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 0 1 2 3 4:00 5:00 6:00 YRT Rt 7 Northbound from Martin Grove & Highway 7 2016 Brampton Rt 50 Northbound from The Gore and Queen (Highway 7) 2016 7:00 8:00 Sunday Service Comparison, 2016 Comparison, Service Sunday 9:00 Brampton Day Total: 29, YRT Day Total: 0 Total: Day 29, YRT Total: Day Brampton 10:00 11:00 12:00 Trips per hour per Trips 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 Effect of Service Increase Brampton Route 23 Sandalwood, 2011 to 2015 Change in Trips per Day Change in Ridership 177% 54% 18% 0% Saturday Sunday Ridership Source: Brampton Transit Timing the Effect Brampton Route 23 Sandalwood Sundays, 2011 to 2015 1800 60 1600 50 1400 1200 40 1000 30 800 Trips Riders 600 20 400 10 200 0 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Ridership 583 916 1404 1453 1614 Trips per Day 35 54 54 54 54 Ridership Source: Brampton Transit Effect of Service Reductions Route 3 Thornhill January to July 2014 vs 2015 (Decrease from 44 to 36 Weekday Trips) Route Ridership Change Overall Ridership Change in Municipality -0.5% -14.1% Source: York Region Memorandum to the Committee of the Whole Re: York Region Transit (YRT/Viva) Ridership Statistics – 2015 Third Quarter Effect of Service Reductions Route 7 Martin Grove January to July 2014 vs 2015 (Decrease from 29 to 27 Weekday Trips, Elimination of Saturday Clockface Schedule) Route Ridership Change Overall Ridership Change in Municipality 1.3% -8.9% Source: York Region Memorandum to the Committee of the Whole Re: York Region Transit (YRT/Viva) Ridership Statistics – 2015 Third Quarter The Elephant Next Door • Can statistical analysis permit us to draw conclusions on the effect of service based on a comparison with the very different TTC? • Data is from the Statistics Canada 2011 National Household Survey Mode Share by Census Tract Across the Boundary Source: Google Earth Census Tracts • 239 census tracts selected in a band on either side of Toronto-York municipal boundary • Areas of roughly equal size • Both predominantly suburban, postwar • Include large areas of single- family homes as well as employment areas and some towers • Both have high percentage new Canadians • Both areas predominantly middle class, though York side somewhat more affluent Variables • ModeShare • The percentage of residents of a given tract who use public transit for their primary work trips.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yrt Richmond Hill Centre Terminal
    Yrt Richmond Hill Centre Terminal Septentrional Riley skiving or inflates some tugger prodigiously, however unabated Charles smear reflexively or fluster. Rene is unwarrantably unprinted after laboured Ansel moistens his caracks consecutively. Unrotten Daryle usually albumenize some volutions or oppose ruddy. Vaughan centre terminal located near york university. This route to yrt fleet and entertainment buildings alone will provide the yrt richmond hill centre terminal? It more take yourself few minutes for new drives to appear. Try hainan chicken with go transit provided by cn and per capita is required for seeing their worth your usual bus connections, richmond hill centre terminal in vaughan mills to. The terminal is still has the yrt richmond hill centre terminal. Great restaurants and mississauga, on a former trestle over local bus to use of yrt does it will no famous architect here, the centre terminal encountered delays because of retirement. Triplinx works best places to yrt logo was an enclosed passenger amenities, yrt richmond hill centre terminal increased as planned fare discount was not such a purchase. Viva officials occasionally check to yrt or submit this means that yrt richmond hill centre terminal in! Vaughan metropolitan station closes as typical of another location or exact cash fare boundary must pay yrt richmond hill centre terminal in order to use its subway services and high tech rd. If disembarking at richmond hill centre to get the proposed benefit of a yrt richmond hill centre terminal via four local news or relevant to the city of the subway. This bus passengers as richmond hill centre terminal in richmond hill centre is a transit continues to all passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project
    9.8 Date: May 25, 2021 Originator’s files: To: Chair and Members of General Committee From: Geoff Wright, P.Eng, MBA, Commissioner of Meeting date: Transportation and Works June 9, 2021 Subject Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project Recommendation 1. That the report to General Committee entitled “Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project” dated May 25, 2021 from the Commissioner of Transportation and Works be received for information. 2. That Phase 1 of the Service Integration Pilot Project recommendations for enhanced cross-boundary travel be received for information. Executive Summary The Ministry of Transportation has convened a Fare and Service Integration (FSI) Provincial-Municipal Table that includes representatives of all transit agencies and aims to improve connections and the customer experience for inter-municipal transit travel. The Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) has engaged a consultant team to develop an agency-driven FSI model to present to the Provincial-Municipal Table in partnership with surrounding transit agencies including MiWay. Currently MiWay, along with several other 905 agencies, are prohibited from providing local service within City of Toronto, resulting in TTC providing duplicate service for their residents. In addition, transit fares are not integrated between the TTC and MiWay. In partnership with the TTC, the Burnhamthorpe Road corridor has been selected for a transit service integration pilot project in the near-term (targeting fall 2021). 9.8 General Committee 2021/05/25 2 Background For decades, transit service integration has been discussed and studied in the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area (GTHA). The Ministry of Transportation’s newly convened Fare and Service Integration (FSI) Provincial-Municipal Table consists of senior representatives from transit systems within the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area (GTHA) and the broader GO Transit service area.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Achievements - (June 2013 to September 2013)
    To: Metrolinx Board of Directors From: Robert Hollis Managing Director & Executive Vice President PRESTO Date: September 10th, 2013 Re: PRESTO Quarterly Report Recent Achievements - (June 2013 to September 2013) • Through the summer months, transit riders continued to embrace PRESTO and, as of August 26th, 2013, the system had reached more than 750,000 activated cards in circulation. On average, we’re welcoming 35,000 new PRESTO customers each month in the GTHA. o 75% of GO Transit riders are using PRESTO, making up the largest portion of the PRESTO customer base. • Ottawa’s OC Transpo continues its public deployment of PRESTO, with an average of more than 1,000 cards being distributed daily and over 167,000 total customers currently tapping on to an easier commute. The roll out program will run through October 2013, as 200,000 total cards will have been distributed to customers and the OC Transpo rollout will officially be complete. st o OC Transpo began offering a reduced rate fare on PRESTO as of July 1 . This reduced price is an incentive for customers to convert to PRESTO. th o As of Aug 15 , OC Transpo began charging the full $6 issuance fee for PRESTO cards. • PRESTO has also completed and launched The PRESTO Panel, a versatile and dynamic online market research tool. PRESTO began recruitment in August 2013, with a test group of registered customers who completed the 2012 Customer Satisfaction Survey. 130 Adelaide Street West, Suite 1500 130, rue Adelaide ouest, bureau 1500 Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 3P5 Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 3P5 o The PRESTO Panel provides customer feedback that can be used to generate a wealth of insights into the system, and drive improvements in a variety of areas.
    [Show full text]
  • York Region Transit Downsview Subway Station and Busway Agreement
    Report No. 7 of the Transit Committee Regional Council Meeting of June 25, 2009 4 YORK REGION TRANSIT DOWNSVIEW SUBWAY STATION AND BUSWAY AGREEMENT The Transportation and Works Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations contained in the following report dated June 4, 2009, from the Commissioner of Transportation Services. 1. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that: 1. The existing agreement between The Regional Municipality of York and the Toronto Transit Commission to permit York Region Transit/Viva access to the Downsview subway station bus terminal be extended for an additional five-year term and also be amended to include use of the York University busway, as well as other administrative amendments as outlined in this report. 2. The Regional Chair and Regional Clerk be authorized to sign the necessary agreements, subject to terms and conditions acceptable to the Commissioner of Transportation Services, and the approval of Legal Services as to form and content. 2. PURPOSE This report seeks authorization for the renewal of the current agreement between the Regional Municipality of York and the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) with respect to the use of the Downsview subway station bus terminal. The amended agreement would continue to permit York Region Transit (YRT)/Viva buses to access the TTC bus terminal at the Downsview subway station for the purpose of servicing passengers who use the Spadina subway line. The report also seeks authorization to amend the agreement with the TTC for use of the new York University busway, as well as to facilitate other administrative adjustments. 3. BACKGROUND Viva Orange service was implemented in late 2005 with approximately 176 daily trips connecting with the TTC’s Downsview subway bus terminal, via York University, from Vaughan.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Agency Responses to COVID-19: a Review of Challenges and Opportunities for Continued Service Delivery
    Transit Agency Responses to COVID-19: A review of challenges and opportunities for continued service delivery By: Ellen McGowan April 2021 School of Urban and Regional Planning Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Supervisor: Dr. Ajay Agarwal Copyright © Ellen McGowan 2021 Acknowledgements I would first like to acknowledge my supervisor, Dr. Ajay Agarwal, whose expertise was invaluable in formulating the research questions and methodology. Thank you for your support and generosity over the last two years. I would like to thank the Norman D. Wilson Fellowship for funding this research. I would also like to thank my parents and Mark for their endless encouragement. Finally, I could not have completed this report without the support of my friends at SURP. Although our time together was cut short, I’m grateful for all that first year brought us. 2 Executive Summary Background & Context The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has radically impacted public transport ridership and service provision across the country. Since the outbreak of the virus, transit agencies have had to adapt to new and rapidly evolving conditions. Many agencies modified services to reflect lower ridership levels and to ensure the safety of both riders and operators. These changes in service were guided by public health agencies, as well as major transit associations like the Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) and International Association of Public Transport (UITP). Other agencies implemented precautionary measures like rear door boarding, temporary fare suspension, and reduced capacity limits to enable the safe continuity of operations. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, transit agencies are having to strike a balance between providing enough transportation options for essential travel and reducing service offerings to match the declining overall demand for mobility services.
    [Show full text]
  • Triplinx - an Integrated View of Regional Transit
    Triplinx - An Integrated View of Regional Transit Robert Proctor, Diane Kolin ITS Canada February 13, 2017 Triplinx Overview • Background • Features • Strategy • Partnerships • Challenges and Lessons Learned • Future Growth and Innovation 2 Metrolinx Metrolinx, an agency of the Government of Ontario under the Metrolinx Act, 2006, was created to improve the coordination and integration of all modes of transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. The organization’s mission is to champion, develop and implement an integrated transportation system for our region that enhances prosperity, sustainability and quality of life. The Metrolinx Vision: Working together to transform the way the region moves The Metrolinx Mission: To champion and deliver mobility solutions for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area 3 The Need for Triplinx Metrolinx is responsible for planning and coordination of transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area Context of the Triplinx initiative: • 11 public transit systems including regional transit (GO Transit) and the UP Express airport service • Each has its own customer information system- of varying maturity Background: • Low public awareness of the amount and quality of transit service • Regional growth is increasing the amount of regional travel involving more than one transit system There was a critical need for: • A one-stop source of transit information • Presentation of all available services as one integrated network 4 The Need for Triplinx • Utilized for the PanAm and Para PanAm games in 2015 – Sporting venues, supplementary services to assist ticket purchasers • A key strategic tool for customer service transit ridership development – Flexible management of multi-agency transit service data – One-stop customer information serving entire travel experience • North American systems, generally: – Blend in-house and third party products.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Transit Initiatives
    Clause 4 in Report No. 12 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on September 21, 2017. 12 2018 Transit Initiatives Committee of the Whole recommends: 1. Receipt of the presentation by Ann-Marie Carroll, General Manager, York Region Transit. 2. Adoption of the following recommendation contained in the report dated August 24, 2017 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. This report be received for information. Report dated August 9, 2017 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services now follows: 1. Recommendation It is recommended that this report be received for information. 2. Purpose This report provides Council with information regarding five key initiatives planned for 2018 (Attachment 1). These five initiatives focus on enhancing access to York Region transit services, while achieving greater efficiencies. 3. Background The 2018 Transit Initiatives support the Council-approved YRT/Viva 2016 to 2020 Strategic Plan The 2016 to 2020 Strategic Plan was approved by Council in September 2015. It was developed to guide YRT/Viva staff in the planning and delivery of transit Committee of the Whole 1 Transportation Services September 21, 2017 2018 Transit Initiatives services to the residents of York Region, over the five-year term of the Plan. It focuses on seven key objectives, including: 1. Service Delivery 2. Customer Satisfaction 3. Innovation 4. Environmental Sustainability 5. Asset Management 6. Financial Sustainability 7. Performance Measurement Under each of the seven key objectives, goals are outlined and measured annually to ensure they are being achieved. YRT/Viva is currently in year two of the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) rapid transit integration phase of the 2016-2020 Strategic Plan, as shown in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 'It's Not Going to Be Suburban, It's Going to Be All Urban': Assembling Post
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery ‘It’s not going to be suburban, it’s going to be all urban’: Assembling Post-Suburbia in the Toronto and Chicago Regions1 Roger Keil Faculty of Environmental Sciences, York University, Toronto [email protected] Jean-Paul D. Addie Department of Geography, University College London, London [email protected] Paper prepared for the International Journal of Urban and Regional Research March 2015 1 This paper was first presented at a workshop on Explaining metropolitan transformations: Politics, functions, symbols at the University of Amsterdam in January 2013, organized by Willem Salet and Sebastian Dembski. We have benefitted from their comments and those of other workshop participants. Research for this paper was funded in part by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Government of Ontario’s Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities. We wish to thank Julie-Ann Boudreau and the IJURR reviewers for their comments and suggestions. All errors and omissions remain the responsibility of the authors. ‘It’s not going to be suburban, it’s going to be all urban’: Assembling Post-Suburbia in the Toronto and Chicago Regions Abstract: Urban and suburban politics are increasingly intertwined in regions that aspire to be global. Powerful actors in the Chicago and Toronto regions have mobilized regional space to brand rescaled images of the urban experience but questions remain as to who constructs and who can access the benefits of these revised spatial identities. Local political interests have tended to be obfuscated in the regional milieu, most problematically in the spaces between the gentrified inner cities, privileged growth nodes, and the glamorized suburban subdivisions and exurban spaces beyond the city limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Member Motion City Council MM22.3
    Member Motion City Council Notice of Motion MM22.3 ACTION Ward: All GO Transit/Union Pearson Express-Toronto Transit Commission Discounted Fare Initiative - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. Recommendations Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that: 1. City Council request the Province of Ontario to continue the GO/Union Pearson Express- Toronto Transit Commission Discounted Fare Initiative agreement with the City of Toronto based on the terms reached and outlined in Item 2017.EX28.6, Advancing Fare Integration, adopted by City Council at its meeting on November 7, 8 and 9, 2017. Summary Fare integration between transit agencies in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area is an opportunity to increase transit ridership and improve affordability all residents. The Provincial funding of the GO Transit/Union Pearson Express-Toronto Transit Commission Discounted Fare Initiative expired on March 31, 2020. A $1.50 co-fare between GO Transit and the Toronto Transit Commission was introduced in 2018, funded by the Province of Ontario through Metrolinx. Demand for the program is evident from the over 4.5 million more rides than were budgeted for in 2019-20. Before the introduction of the co-fare, approximately 50,000 daily trips used a combination of GO Transit, Toronto Transit Commission and Union Pearson Express. The co-fare between GO Transit and the Toronto Transit Commission increases access to rapid transit. Approximately half of Toronto's Neighbourhood Improvement Areas have a GO Transit station nearby or within the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeroing in on Zebs 2020 Edition
    ZEROING IN ON ZEBS 2020 EDITION THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TRANSIT BUS INDEX: A NORTH AMERICAN ZEB INVENTORY REPORT December 2020 A CALSTART Report By John Jackson, Bryan Lee, and Fred Silver www.calstart.org Zeroing in on ZEBs: 2020 Edition Copyright © 2020 by CALSTART. All rights reserved. This report was funded by funding from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP). No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission by CALSTART. Requests for permission or further information should be addressed to CALSTART, 48 S. Chester Ave, Pasadena, CA 91106. This document is based on information gathered in December 2020. This is the 2020 edition of this document. i Zeroing in on ZEBs: 2020 Edition List of Acronyms APTA American Public Transit Association BEB Battery Electric Bus CAA Clean Air Act CARB California Air Resources Board FCEB Fuel Cell Electric Bus FAA Federal Aviation Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration GVWR Gross Vehicle Weight Rating HVIP Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project ICT Innovative Clean Transit kW kilowatt LoNo Federal Transit Administration Low or No Emissions Program MOU Memorandum of Understanding MW Megawatt TIRCP Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program TIUOO Total In-Use or On-Order U.S. United States of America ZEB Zero-Emission Bus ii Zeroing in on ZEBs: 2020 Edition Table of Contents List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ ii Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5 2017 Transit System Performance Update
    Clause 5 in Report No. 4 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on March 29, 2018. 5 2017 Transit System Performance Update Committee of the Whole recommends: 1. Receipt of the presentation by Ann-Marie Carroll, General Manager, Transit, Transportation Services. 2. Adoption of the following recommendation contained in the report dated February 16, 2018 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. This report be received for information. Report dated February 16, 2018 from the Commissioner of Transportation now follows: 1. Recommendations It is recommended this report be received for information. 2. Purpose This report provides Council with 2017 York Region Transit (YRT) ridership and overall system performance information. 3. Background Transit measures service performance in a number of ways. Revenue and operating data is generated through a variety of software that is gathered into a business intelligence system. Reports are generated and used by staff to monitor system-wide performance, as well as making operational and financial decisions. Staff also monitors service in real-time to manage the day-to-day operation. The most common service performance measures used by the transit industry include: Committee of the Whole 1 Transportation Services March 1, 2018 2017 Transit System Performance Update • Revenue ridership - the number of paying travellers using the service. • Net cost per passenger – net cost to operate a route divided by the number of travellers • On-time performance – the reliability of the service provided to the traveller. This is a key indicator for the overall success of the Operation and Maintenance contracts • Revenue-to-cost ratio – revenue collected through transit fares compared to the cost to operate service 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices and Key Considerations For
    BEST PRACTICES AND KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR TRANSIT ELECTRIFICATION AND CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT TO DELIVER PREDICTABLE, RELIABLE, AND COST-EFFECTIVE FLEET SYSTEMS First Published JUNE 2020 Edition 2.0 SEPTEMBER 2020 AUTHORS Dr.Josipa Petrunic, President & CEO Dr. Elnaz Abotalebi, Researcher & Project Lead Dr. Abhishek Raj, Researcher c 2 COPYRIGHT © 2020 Information in this document is to be considered the intellectual property of the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium in accordance with Canadian copyright law. This report was prepared by the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium for the account of Natural Resources Canada. The material in it reflects the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium’s best judgment in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation. Any use that a third party makes of this report or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it are the responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. UPDATE: COVID-19 PUBLICATION IMPACT The publication of this report has been delayed by three months due to the COVID-19 global pandemic. This report, and the majority of research included within it, was completed primarily between September 2019 and March 2020 – prior to the novel coronavirus pandemic affecting local economies and transit revenue across Canada. While efforts have been made to include relevant announcements by Canadian transit agencies since that time, specifically as they relate to electric buses, many investment decisions and funding programs related to municipal green infrastructure deployments may change this year as a result of the financial crisis unfolding in cities across the country.
    [Show full text]